1. Using clotted, pelleted blood samples for direct molecular detection of Bartonella spp. in small mammal wildlife surveillance studies.
- Author
-
Jeeves SP, Fernando C, Kotwa JD, Mubareka S, Hill JE, and Jardine CM
- Subjects
- Animals, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction methods, Bartonella isolation & purification, Bartonella genetics, DNA, Bacterial blood, DNA, Bacterial genetics, DNA, Bacterial isolation & purification, Spleen microbiology, Bartonella Infections diagnosis, Bartonella Infections blood, Bartonella Infections microbiology, Animals, Wild microbiology
- Abstract
Objective: Bartonella are emerging bacterial zoonotic pathogens. Utilization of clotted blood samples for surveillance of these bacteria in wildlife has begun to supersede the use of tissues; however, the efficacy of these samples has not been fully investigated. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of spleen and blood samples for DNA extraction and direct detection of Bartonella spp. via qPCR. In addition, we present a protocol for improved DNA extraction from clotted, pelleted (i.e., centrifuged) blood samples obtained from wild small mammals., Results: DNA concentrations from kit-extracted blood clot samples were low and A260/A280 absorbance ratios indicated high impurity. Kit-based DNA extraction of spleen samples was efficient and produced ample DNA concentrations of good quality. We developed an in-house extraction method for the blood clots which resulted in apposite DNA quality when compared to spleen samples extracted via MagMAX DNA Ultra 2.0 kit. We detected Bartonella in 9/30 (30.0%) kit-extracted spleen DNA samples and 11/30 (36.7%) in-house-extracted blood clot samples using PCR. Our results suggest that kit-based methods may be less suitable for DNA extraction from blood clots, and that blood clot samples may be superior to tissues for Bartonella detection., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF