Search

Background A meta-analysis of the effects of HER2 status, specifically within the first 2–3 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, has the potential to inform patient selection for upfront aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy or switching strategy tamoxifen followed by AI. The pre-existing standardisation of methodology for HER2 (immunohistochemistry/fluorescence in situ hybridization) facilitates analysis of existing data for this key marker. Methods Following a prospectively designed statistical analysis plan, patient data from 3 phase III trials Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination Trial (ATAC), Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 and Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multicentre Trial (TEAM)] comparing an AI to tamoxifen during the first 2–3 years of adjuvant endocrine treatment were collected and a treatment-by-marker analysis of distant recurrence-free interval-censored at 2–3 years treatment – for HER2 status × AI versus tamoxifen treatment was performed to address the clinical question relating to efficacy of ‘upfront’ versus ‘switch’ strategies for AIs. Results A prospectively planned, patient-level data meta-analysis across 3 trials demonstrated a significant treatment (AI versus tamoxifen) by marker (HER2) interaction in a multivariate analysis; (interaction hazard ratio [HR] = 1.61, 95% CI 1.01–2.57; p < 0.05). Heterogeneity between trials did not reach statistical significance. The HER2 negative (HER2−ve) group gained greater benefit from AI versus tamoxifen (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.56–0.87) than the HER2-positive (HER2+ve) group (HR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.75–1.71). However, the small number of HER2+ve cases (n = 1092 across the 3 trials) and distant recurrences (n = 111) may explain heterogeneity between trials. Conclusions A patient-level data meta-analysis demonstrated a significant interaction between HER2 status and treatment with AI versus tamoxifen in the first 2–3 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Patients with HER2−ve cancers experienced improved outcomes (distant relapse) when treated with upfront AI rather than tamoxifen, whilst patients with HER2+ve cancers fared no better or slightly worse in the first 2–3 years. However, the small number of HER2+ve cancers/events may explain a large degree of heterogeneity in the HER2+ve groups across all 3 trials. Other causes, perhaps related to subtle differences between AIs, cannot be excluded and warrant further exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pharmacogenomics is defined as research into inherited genetic variations that determine an individual’s response to therapeutic agents. In oncology, pharmacogenomics based on somatic molecular alterations inherited by subsequent cancer cell generations forms the basis of molecular targeting of novel therapeutic agents. What has emerged from clinical experience with such agents is the need for appropriate pharmacodiagnostic approaches to ensure the drugs are correctly targeted. Given the broad range of pharmacogenomic agents currently under evaluation for cancer therapy, it appears that a rapid extension of pharmacodiagnostic profiling will be required in the next 5–10 years, if not sooner. If this is to be successfully achieved, lessons learned in the past, particularly during the development of HER2 (ERBB2) testing for directing trastuzumab therapy in breast cancer, may provide a valuable framework for the development of future pharmacodiagnostic assays system. This article reviews the biological and clinical rationale for targeting breast cancer with trastuzumab and the steps taken to validate and improve pharmacodiagnostic procedures for testing tumor HER2 protein expression and HER2 gene amplification. Attention is given to quality assurance and reproducibility of testing approaches and the optimal selection of patients for response to trastuzumab. This approach serves as a paradigm for the future development of pharmacodiagnostic tests in oncology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the androgen receptor and signal-transduction pathways in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. According to the authors, treatment for advanced or metastatic prostate cancer has relied on androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for the past 50 years. At present, few treatment options offer effective relief for patients who develop resistance to ADT. Here the authors describe described how prostate cancer growth is stimulated in response to androgens, and consequently how ADT acts to combat this. They also explain how modifications to the androgen receptor (AR) via mutations, amplification and phosphorylation may affect the development of androgen escape.

The article reports that at present there are no effective treatment options for patients who develop androgen escape. Although clinical trials with only antiandrogen therapy improve the quality of life of the patient, it does not alter survival. The development of androgen escape is therefore one of the most significant events in the progression of prostate cancer, resulting in a greater risk of morbidity, and reduced survival. The lack of novel and effective therapies to treat androgen escape is a result of the poor understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of both the primary disease, and more particularly, those events which drive androgen escape.

The promising effect of antibody–drug conjugates on breast cancer with low expression of HER2 (HER2-low) raises many questions regarding the optimal selection of patients for this treatment. A key question is whether HER2 immunohistochemistry, an assay optimised to detect HER2 amplification, is reliable enough to assess HER2 protein levels to select patients with HER2-low breast cancer in daily pathology practices worldwide. Moreover, whether this assessment can be performed with sufficient reproducibility between pathologists in daily practices is debatable. Herein, we address the historical track record of the CAP-ASCO HER2 Guidelines, the reported limited reproducibility by pathologists of HER2 immunohistochemistry in the non-amplified cases, and the performance variation of different antibodies. Based on this summary, we propose solutions to improve the robustness to enable reliable identification of patients with HER2-low breast cancer. • The definitions of HER2 0 and 1+ by IHC need to be redefined by the ASCO/CAP. • HER2 IHC assays are not calibrated to detect low-levels of HER2. • Other issues include reproducibility, different HER2-assay performance, etc. • The errors of the PDL1-saga are currently being repeated in the HER2-low narrative. • Solutions are proposed to industry, regulators, and academia (Table 1). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: The oestrogen receptor (ERα) may be activated in a ligand-dependent manner, via oestrogen, or in a ligand-independent manner, via signal transduction pathways. Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) is known to directly phosphorylate ERα at serine 118 in a ligand-independent manner. This study investigated the interaction between MAPK and ERα in breast cancer. Materials & methods: Immunohistochemical experiments were undertaken to determine the expression of MAPK, pMAPK and pER(ser118) in breast tumours to determine their clinical relevance. Immunofluorescent experiments were performed, on MCF-7 breast cancer cells, to monitor the phosphorylation and localisation of MAPK and ERα in response to oestrogen, heregulin and a MAPK inhibitor. Results: Oestrogen and Heregulin stimulated phosphorylation of ERα and its nuclear translocation, but heregulin induced this at levels much lower than those observed with oestrogen. Following stimulation with heregulin, but not oestrogen, treatment with MAPK inhibitor reduced the levels of nuclear pER(ser118). In cells treated with both oestrogen and heregulin, nuclear pER(ser118) was visible; but at levels comparable with heregulin treatment alone. Conclusion: This study confirms that ligand-mediated phosphorylation is associated with rapid nuclear localisation of ERα, due to oestrogen binding. ERα is phosphorylated at serine 118 in a ligand-independent manner. Preventing nuclear translocation of pMAPK reduced the levels of ligand-independent, but not ligand-dependent phosphorylation of ERα. Co-stimulation with both oestrogen and heregulin suggested that heregulin mediated signalling determines the subcellular localisation of ERα. Activation of ERα by direct phosphorylation may result in its rapid deactivation due to degradation or nuclear export. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Breast Cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer death in women, representing a very complex disease with varied molecular alterations. To assist breast cancer prognosis, the classification of patients into biological groups is of great significance for treatment strategies. Recent studies have used an ensemble of multiple clustering algorithms to elucidate the most characteristic biological groups of breast cancer. However, the combination of various clustering methods resulted in a number of patients remaining unclustered. Therefore, a framework still needs to be developed which can assign as many unclustered (i.e. biologically diverse) patients to one of the identified groups in order to improve classification. Therefore, in this paper we develop a novel classification framework which introduces a new ensemble classification stage after the ensemble clustering stage to target the unclustered patients. Thus, a step-by-step pipeline is introduced which couples ensemble clustering with ensemble classification for the identification of core groups, data distribution in them and improvement in final classification results by targeting the unclustered data. The proposed pipeline is employed on a novel real world breast cancer dataset and subsequently its robustness and stability are examined by testing it on standard datasets. The results show that by using the presented framework, an improved classification is obtained. Finally, the results have been verified using statistical tests, visualisation techniques, cluster quality assessment and interpretation from clinical experts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Several prognostic histological features have been established in female breast cancer (BC), but it is unknown whether these can be extrapolated to male BC patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of several histological features in a large series of male BC. Methods Central pathology review was performed for 1483 male BCs collected through part 1 of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) International Male BC Program. Pathology review included histological subtype, grade, mitotic activity index (MAI), presence of a fibrotic focus and density of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). These features were correlated with clinical outcome. The relationship between these features and surrogate molecular subtypes using immunohistochemistry was also assessed. Results Median follow-up for overall survival (OS) was 7.1 years. Overall histological grade was not significantly associated with OS (p = 0.129). MAI, the presence of a fibrotic focus and a low TIL density however were correlated with unfavourable OS (p = 0.023, p = 0.004 and p = 0.011, respectively). BC subtype correlated with TIL density (p = 0.015), as we observed a higher density for human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) positive BC compared to luminal HER2-negative subtype. No association was observed between subtype and fibrotic focus. Conclusions Histologic grade was not significantly correlated with clinical outcome in this series, unlike what is seen in female patients. These results contribute to our understanding of male BC and indicate the importance of further research on the optimisation of risk stratification and treatment decisions for male BC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Overdiagnosis, and thus overtreatment, are inevitable consequences of most screening programmes; identification of ways of minimising the impact of overdiagnosis demands new prospective research, in particular the need to separate clinically relevant lesions that require active treatment from those that can be safely left alone or monitored and only need treated if they change characteristics. Breast cancer screening has led to a large increase in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnoses. This is a widely heterogeneous disease and most DCIS detected through screening is of high cytonuclear grade and therefore likely to be important clinically. However, the historic practice of surgical treatment for all DCIS is unlikely to be optimal for lower risk patients. A clearer understanding of how to manage DCIS is required. This article describes the background and development of ‘The low risk’ DCIS trial (LORIS), a phase III trial of surgery versus active monitoring. LORIS will determine if it is appropriate to manage women with screen detected or asymptomatic, low grade and intermediate grade DCIS with low grade features, by active monitoring rather than by surgical treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background In breast cancer, immunohistochemical assessment of proliferation using the marker Ki67 has potential use in both research and clinical management. However, lack of consistency across laboratories has limited Ki67’s value. A working group was assembled to devise a strategy to harmonize Ki67 analysis and increase scoring concordance. Toward that goal, we conducted a Ki67 reproducibility study. Methods Eight laboratories received 100 breast cancer cases arranged into 1-mm core tissue microarrays—one set stained by the participating laboratory and one set stained by the central laboratory, both using antibody MIB-1. Each laboratory scored Ki67 as percentage of positively stained invasive tumor cells using its own method. Six laboratories repeated scoring of 50 locally stained cases on 3 different days. Sources of variation were analyzed using random effects models with log2-transformed measurements. Reproducibility was quantified by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the approximate two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the true intraclass correlation coefficients in these experiments were provided. Results Intralaboratory reproducibility was high (ICC = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.93 to 0.97). Interlaboratory reproducibility was only moderate (central staining: ICC = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.78; local staining: ICC = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.68). Geometric mean of Ki67 values for each laboratory across the 100 cases ranged 7.1% to 23.9% with central staining and 6.1% to 30.1% with local staining. Factors contributing to interlaboratory discordance included tumor region selection, counting method, and subjective assessment of staining positivity. Formal counting methods gave more consistent results than visual estimation. Conclusions Substantial variability in Ki67 scoring was observed among some of the world’s most experienced laboratories. Ki67 values and cutoffs for clinical decision-making cannot be transferred between laboratories without standardizing scoring methodology because analytical validity is limited. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abstract: Background: Multiple studies suggest better efficacy of chemotherapy in invasive ductal breast carcinomas (IDC) than invasive lobular breast carcinomas (ILC). However, data on efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapy regimens and histological subtypes are sparse. This study assessed endocrine therapy efficacy in IDC and ILC. The influence of semi-quantitative oestrogen receptor (ER) expression by Allred score was also investigated. Methods: Dutch and Belgian patients enrolled in the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial were randomized to exemestane (25mg daily) alone or following tamoxifen (20mg daily) for 5years. Inclusion was restricted to IDC and ILC patients. Histological subtype was assessed locally; ER expression was centrally reviewed according to Allred score (ER-poor (<7; n =235); ER-rich (⩾7; n =1789)). Primary end-point was relapse-free survival (RFS), which was the time from randomization to disease relapse. Findings: Overall, 2140 (82%) IDC and 463 (18%) ILC patients were included. RFS was similar for both endocrine treatment regimens in IDC (hazard ratio (HR) for exemestane was 0.83 (95%confidence interval (CI) 0.67–1.03)), and ILC (HR 0.69 (95%CI 0.45–1.06)). Irrespective of histological subtype, patients with ER-rich Allred scores allocated to exemestane alone had an improved RFS (multivariable HR 0.71 (95%CI 0.56–0.89)). In contrast, patients with ER-poor Allred scores allocated to exemestane had a worse RFS (multivariable HR 2.33 (95%CI 1.32–4.11)). Significant effect modification by ER-Allred score was confirmed (multivariable p =0.003). Interpretation: Efficacy of endocrine therapy regimens was similar for IDC and ILC. However, ER-rich patients showed superior efficacy to upfront exemestane, while ER-poor patients had better outcomes with sequential therapy, irrespective of histological subtype, emphasising the relevance of quantification of ER expression. Funding: The Dutch/Belgian TEAM trial is supported by an unrestricted research grant from Pfizer. The sponsors have in no way influenced the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data and preparation, review or approval of the manuscript. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To investigate conventional prognostic factors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), distant metastasis (DM), and survival after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in screen-detected and symptomatic cases on surveillance up to 25 years. Patients and Methods: A total of 1812 consecutive patients in three cohorts (1981–1989, 1990–1992, and 1993–1998) with T12N01M0 invasive breast cancer were treated with BCT (median follow-up, 14 years). Tumor type and grade were reviewed by a single pathologist. Hormone receptor status was measured by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess independent prognostic variables for relapse and survival. Results: A total of 205 IBTR occurred, with 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year actuarial relapse rates of 4.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.35–5.5%), 8.4% (95% CI 7.1–9.8%), 14.1% (95% CI 12.0–16%), and 17.4% (95% CI 14.5–20.2%). Number of nodes, young age, pathologic tumor size, and multifocality were significant factors for IBTR. Three hundred seventy-eight patients developed DM. The actuarial metastatic rate was 12% at 5 years and 17.9% at 10 years. Young age, number of positive nodes, pathologic tumor size, and tumor grade were significant factors for DM relapse. When conventional prognostic indices were taken into account screen-detected cancers showed no improvement in overall relapse or survival rate compared with symptomatic cases but did show a reduced risk of DM after IBTR. After 10 years IBTR relapse continued at a constant rate of 0.87% per annum. Conclusions: The Edinburgh BCT series has shown that screen-detected invasive breast cancers do not have significantly different clinical outcomes compared with symptomatic cases when pathologic risk factors are taken into account. This suggests that these patients be managed in a similar way. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Aims: Galectin-3 plays an important role in adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, angiogenesis and metastasis in multiple tumours. To investigate the role of galectin-3 in melanoma pathogenesis we examined the expression of galectin-3 in melanocytic lesions and analysed the correlation between galectin-3 expression and clinicopathologic factors including patient survival and BRAF mutation status. Methods: We evaluated the expression of galectin-3 in 53 cases of benign naevi, 31 cases of dysplastic naevi, 59 in-situ melanomas, 314 cases of primary melanoma and 69 metastatic melanomas using tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry. Results: Marked differences in expression of galectin-3 were seen between different categories of melanocytic lesions (ANOVA p <0.0001). An increase in expression of galectin-3 between benign naevi and thin primary melanomas and a progressive decrease in expression between thin primary melanomas and thicker melanomas or metastatic melanomas was seen. Strong galectin-3 expression was associated with improved overall survival (p =0.002 and p =0.0002 for cytoplasmic and nuclear expression, respectively) and melanoma-specific survival (p =0.017 and p =0.003 for cytoplasmic and nuclear expression, respectively). A multifactorial Cox regression analysis suggested that galectin-3 expression was an independent prognostic marker for overall survival in melanoma (risk ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.547–0.970, p =0.031 for cytoplasmic expression and risk ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.587–0.985, p =0.036 for nuclear expression). No association between galectin-3 expression and BRAF mutation status was observed. Conclusion: This study suggests that galectin-3 is a marker of progression in melanocytic lesions and a novel prognostic marker in primary melanoma. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The aim of this pilot study was to assess the role of immune markers in fast relapse (<2 years) of high-grade muscle invasive urothelial carcinomas of the bladder (HGUC) treated by cystectomy. A series of 40 such cases was investigated for immune protein (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, CD163, FOXP3 and PD-1) status by immunohistochemistry. Decreased expression of all immune cell markers was observed in tumors of patients who relapsed quickly. In Kaplan-Meier (log-rank test) analysis, low CD3, CD4 and CD8 expression was associated with fast relapse (P = 0.005, 0.028, 0.036 respectively). Additional evaluation of the immune transcriptome by NanoString Human PanCancer Immune Panel v.1.1 has identified 5 differentially expressed genes significantly associated with fast relapse. Among these, KLRB1 and HLA-DQA1 were also significant on Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank test P = 0.007 and 0.006, respectively). These findings strengthen the potential clinical utility and, hence, the need for further evaluation of immune markers in HGUC prognostication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary We integrated clinical, genomic, and transcriptomic data from 224 primaries and 95 metastases from 289 patients to characterize progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Driver gene alterations and mutational and expression-based signatures were preserved, with truncations, inversions, and translocations most conserved. Cell cycle progression (CCP) increased with sequential inactivation of tumor suppressors, yet remained higher in metastases, perhaps driven by cell cycle regulatory gene variants. Half of the cases were hypoxic by expression markers, overlapping with molecular subtypes. Paired tumor heterogeneity showed cancer cell migration by Halstedian progression. Multiple PDACs arising synchronously and metachronously in the same pancreas were actually intra-parenchymal metastases, not independent primary tumors. Established clinical co-variates dominated survival analyses, although CCP and hypoxia may inform clinical practice. Graphical Abstract Highlights • Higher cell cycle progression in PDAC metastases; increases with driver gene loss • Half of PDACs are hypoxic and are associated with subtypes and treatment response • Paired tumors show molecular conservation and Halstedian progression • Multiple PDACs arising in the same pancreas are intra-parenchymal metastases Connor et al. molecularly characterize primary and metastatic PDAC and show conserved alterations between primary and metastatic lesions. Clinical features outperform molecular alterations in survival analyses, but cell cycle progression and hypoxia signatures may inform clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]