Search

Enrico Peiretti,1 Chiara Ascardi,2 Francesco Bandello,3 Francesco Boscia,4 Monica Varano,5 Marta Bartezaghi,2 Lorenzo De Santi,2 Giovanni Staurenghi6 1Clinica Oculistica, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 2Novartis Farma S.p.A, Milan, Italy; 3Department of Ophthalmology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; 4Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Eye Clinic, University of Bari, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Bari, Bari, Italy; 5IRCCS G.B. Bietti Foundation, Rome, Italy; 6Eye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Luigi Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, ItalyCorrespondence: Enrico Peiretti, Head of the Retina Unit, Eye Clinic, University of Cagliari, Via Ospedale 48, Cagliari, 09100, Italy, Email enripei@hotmail.comPurpose: Limited data is available on treatment satisfaction with the management of wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) among patients in Italy. In this cross-sectional real-world study, treatment satisfaction with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGFs) was assessed in patients with wAMD in Italy.Patients and Methods: This was a non-interventional, cross-sectional survey involving patients with wAMD receiving anti-VEGFs. The survey was administered through a virtual assistant via phone. Patients’ treatment satisfaction was assessed using a newly developed Novartis Tailored Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (NVS TTSQ) and the validated Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MacTSQ).Results: Overall, 154 evaluable patients were enrolled in 5 centers across Italy. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 76.8 years (7.01). Overall treatment satisfaction score assessed by NVS TTSQ was 40.50 (7.11), with a mean of 9.97 (1.84) on the information domain and 22.98 (4.57) on the unmet need domain. Patients were satisfied with diagnosis communication (4.99 [1.30]), information provided on treatment administration (4.58 [1.49], range 0– 6), the waiting room (4.40 [1.43]), and management of visits and injections at the center (5.14 [1.12]), general management of maculopathy at the center (5.22 [1.01]). Patients were not satisfied with their independence in terms of disease management (2.56 [2.45]); they would like additional information about the disease (5.38 [1.03]) and to discuss the injection procedures (4.02 [1.94]) with already-treated patients. The overall treatment satisfaction score on MacTSQ scale was 55.84 (10.13).Conclusion: Patients with wAMD are satisfied with the overall management of their disease in Italy. However, patients would like to have more information on prognosis and management of the disease.Keywords: anti-VEGF, patient-reported outcomes, real-world study, treatment satisfaction, treatment satisfaction questionnaire, wAMD

Marina Talamonti,1 Filomena Russo,2 Giovanna Malara,3,4 Katharina Hansel,5 Manuela Papini,6 Angelo Cattaneo,7 Aurora Parodi,8 Andrea Chiricozzi,9,10 Piergiorgio Malagoli,11 Federico Bardazzi,12 Valeria Brazzelli,13 Paolo Dapavo,14 Paolo Gisondi,15 Cristina Zane,16 Concetta Potenza,17 Franca Cantoresi,18 Maria Concetta Fargnoli,19 Sara Trevisini,20 Pina Brianti,21 Leonardo Pescitelli,22 Giovanni Gigante,23 Marta Bartezaghi,23 Luisa Caputo,23 Elisabetta Aloisi,23 Antonio Costanzo24,25 On behalf of the SUPREME Study Group1Dermatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 2Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Science, Dermatology Section, University of Siena, S. Maria alle Scotte Hospital, Siena, Italy; 3Dermatology Unit, Hospital “Bianchi Melacrino Morelli”, Reggio, Calabria, Italy; 4Department of Dermatology, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy; 5Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 6Dermatologic Clinic of Terni, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 7U.O. Dermatologia, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy; 8Di.S.Sal. Section of Dermatology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova GE, 16132, Italy; 9UOC di Dermatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy; 10Dermatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; 11Psocare Unit, I.R.C.C.S Policlinico San Donato, Milano, Italy; 12Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; 13Dermatology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; 14Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Second Dermatologic Clinic, University of Torino, Torino, Italy; 15Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 16Dermatology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; 17Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome – Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy; 18Dermatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Roma, Roma, Italy; 19Dermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy; 20Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; 21Dermatology and Cosmetology Unit - San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; 22Department of Health Sciences, Dermatology Clinic, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy; 23Novartis Farma SpA, Origgio, Italy; 24Unit of Dermatology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy; 25Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milano, ItalyCorrespondence: Marina Talamonti, Dermatology-Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, PTV – Policlinico Tor Vergata, V.le Oxford 81, Rome, 00133, Italy, Tel +39 0620902743, Fax +39 0620902742, Email talamonti.marina@gmail.comPurpose: Secukinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin (IL)-17A approved for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults and children. We compared the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients aged < 65 years (adult patients) versus patients aged ≥ 65 years (elderly patients) in a post-hoc analysis of the SUPREME study.Patients and Methods: Patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis received subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg per week for the first 5 weeks, then 300 mg per month. We compared the following outcomes in patients aged ≥ 65 years vs < 65 years: baseline characteristics; PASI50/75/90/100 response rates (improvements ≥ 50%/75%/90%/100% in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) from baseline); changes in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD-A, HAD-D) score changes; treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).Results: Secukinumab was slightly less effective in elderly patients than in adult patients (response rates at week 16: PASI90, 69.4% vs 80.9%, p = 0.4528; PASI100, 44.4% vs 56.7%, p = 0.8973). Elderly and adult patients showed a similar time course of changes in absolute PASI scores. Patients aged ≥ 65 years had a statistically significantly lower improvement in quality of life (mean DLQI reduction) than patients aged < 65 years at week 16 [− 5.4 (± 4.3) vs − 8.8 (± 6.9), p = 0.0065] and at week 24 [− 5.3 (± 4.4) vs − 9.2 (± 7.1), p = 0.0038]. Secukinumab treatment resulted in comparable mean reductions in anxiety and depression scores in both cohorts at 24 weeks [HAD-A, − 1.3 (± 3.3) vs − 2.1 (± 3.8), p = 0.9004; HAD-D, − 1.0 (± 3.3) vs − 1.5 (± 3.1), p = 0.4598]. The frequency of TEAEs in the two cohorts was similar (16.7% vs 14.6%, p = 0.7391).Conclusion: Secukinumab is a valid option for the management of moderate to severe psoriasis in elderly patients.Keywords: psoriasis, biologics, interleukin-17A, secukinumab, elderly

Luca Stingeni,1 Giovanna Malara,2,3 Andrea Conti,4 Luisa Di Costanzo,5 Carlo Giovanni Carrera,6 Martina Burlando,7 Piergiorgio Malagoli,8 Maria Letizia Musumeci,9 Federico Bardazzi,10 Valeria Brazzelli,11 Paolo Amerio,12 Clara De Simone,13,14 Sara Trevisini,15 Anna Balato,16 Matteo Megna,17 Francesco Loconsole,18 Catia De Felice,19 Marta Bartezaghi,20 Alice Rausa,20 Elisabetta Aloisi,20 Roberto Orsenigo,20 Antonio Costanzo21,22 On behalf of the SUPREME Study Group1Dermatology Section, Medical and Surgical Department, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 2Dermatology Unit, Hospital “Bianchi Melacrino Morelli”, Reggio Calabria, Italy; 3Department of Dermatology, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy; 4Dermatologic Unit, Department of Surgery, Infermi Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy; 5Department of Dermatology, “Gaetano Rummo” Hospital, Benevento UOC Dermatologia, AO G. Rummo, Benevento, Italy; 6U.O. Dermatologia, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy; 7IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, Di.S.Sal. Section of Dermatology, Genoa, Italy; 8Dermatology Unit IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; 9Dermatology Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; 10Division of Dermatology, University Hospital Policlinico “S. Orsola-Malpighi”, Bologna, Italy; 11Institute of Dermatology, Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; 12Dermatologic Clinic, G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy; 13Istituto di Dermatologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; 14Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli – IRCCS, Rome, Italy; 15Dermatology Department, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; 16Dermatology Unit, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy; 17Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; 18Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy; 19Department of Clinical Dermatology, Centre for the Study and Treatment of Psoriasis, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; 20Novartis Farma SpA, Origgio, Italy; 21Unit of Dermatology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; 22Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, ItalyCorrespondence: Luca Stingeni, Dermatology Section, Medical and Surgical Department, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy, Tel +39075-5783881, Email luca.stingeni@unipg.itPurpose: Psoriasis, a common systemic inflammatory disorder, presents with gender-related differences in the quality of life (QoL) and treatment outcomes. This post hoc analysis from the Phase 3b SUPREME study explored gender-related differences in patient characteristics and efficacy of secukinumab 300 mg on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75/90/100 and impact on QoL using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis through week 24.Patients and Methods: The proportion of patients achieving PASI 75/90/100 was computed using a nonresponder imputation approach. Differences between cohorts were analyzed using a logistic regression model. The mean change from baseline in DLQI was computed using the Wilcoxon test.Results: Among the 433 patients (males: 71.6%), females had a higher DLQI than males at baseline (13.1 vs 9.5; P< 0.0001). Males had a slightly higher response for PASI 90 than females at week 16 (80.7% vs 78.1%; P=0.0779) and 24 (83.2% vs 79.7%; P=0.0319). No differences were observed between genders in PASI 100/75 responses at week 24. Both genders showed an improvement in DLQI with secukinumab at week 24 (− 10.9 vs − 8.1, respectively, in females vs males; P=0.0004).Conclusion: In summary, secukinumab was effective in the treatment of psoriasis, irrespective of gender.Keywords: plaque psoriasis, PASI, patient-reported outcomes, Dermatology Quality of Life Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

Filomena Russo,1 Marco Galluzzo,2,3 Luca Stingeni,4 Severino Persechino,5 Leonardo Zichichi,6 Andrea Conti,7 Claudia Giofrè,8 Valentina Dini,9 Martina Vispi,10 Laura Atzori,11 Angelo Cattaneo,12 Aurora Parodi,13 Federico Bardazzi,14 Giuseppe Stinco,15 Paolo Dapavo,16 Giampiero Girolomoni,17 Maria Letizia Musumeci,18 Manuela Papini,19 Marina Venturini,20 Stefano Dastoli,21 Sergio Di Nuzzo,22 Maria Concetta Fargnoli,23 Gianluca Pagnanelli,24 Nicoletta Bernardini,25 Daniele Mario Gambini,26 Piergiorgio Malagoli,27 Carlo Mazzatenta,28 Ketty Peris,29 Iris Zalaudek,30 Gabriella Fabbrocini31 ,† Francesco Loconsole,32 Camilla Vassallo,33 Lucia Pietroleonardo,34 Francesca Prignano,35 Chiara Franchi,36 Anna Maria Offidani,37 Claudio Bonifati,38 Vito Di Lernia,39 Giovanni Gigante,40 Marta Silvia Bartezaghi,40 Matteo Franchi,41,42 Paola Ursoleo,40 Elisabetta Aloisi40 1Dermatology Section, Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Science, University of Siena, S. Maria Alle Scotte Hospital, Siena, Italy; 2Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy; 3Dermatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy; 4Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 5Dermatology Unit, NESMOS Department, Faculty of Medicine & Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy; 6Unit of Dermatology, San Antonio Abate Hospital, Trapani, Italy; 7Section of Dermatology, Department of Specialized Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; 8U.O.C. Dermatologia, A.O. Papardo, Messina, Italy; 9Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 10Dermatology Unit, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy; 11Dermatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 12Dermatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy; 13Section of Dermatology, DiSSal University of Genoa, Ospedale-Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy; 14Dermatology Division, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; 15Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy; 16Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 17Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 18Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; 19Dermatology Clinic of Terni, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 20Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; 21Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy; 22Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy; 23Section of Dermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Science, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy; 24Department of Dermatology, Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata - IRCCS, Roma, Italy; 25Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Dermatology Unit, “Daniele Innocenzi”, Asl Latina, Italy; 26Dermatology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy; 27Dermatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy; 28Dermatology Unit, Lucca Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Pisa, Italy; 29Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy; 30Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; 31Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; 32Department of Dermatology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy; 33Institute of Dermatology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; 34Dermatology Unit, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy; 35Dermatology Clinic, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 36Dermatology Unit, IRCCS IO Galeazzi, Milan, Italy; 37Dermatological Clinic, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy; 38Department of Dermatology, Istituto Dermatologico San Gallicano - IRCCS, Roma, Italy; 39Dermatology Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy; 40Novartis Farma SpA, Origgio, Italy; 41National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy; 42Laboratory of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy†Gabriella Fabbrocini passed away on 3 March 2023Correspondence: Filomena Russo, Dermatology Section, Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Science, University of Siena, S. Maria Alle Scotte Hospital, Siena, Italy, Email file.russo@libero.itPurpose: SUPREME, a phase IIIb study conducted in Italy, demonstrated safety and high efficacy of secukinumab for up to 72 weeks in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis. SUPREME 2.0 study aimed to provide real-world data on the long-term drug survival and effectiveness of secukinumab beyond 72 weeks.Patients and Methods: SUPREME 2.0 is a retrospective observational chart review study conducted in patients previously enrolled in SUPREME study. After the end of the SUPREME study, eligible patients continued treatment as per clinical practice, and their effectiveness and drug survival data were retrieved from medical charts.Results: Of the 415 patients enrolled in the SUPREME study, 297 were included in SUPREME 2.0; of which, 210 (70.7%) continued secukinumab treatment throughout the 42-month observation period. Patients in the biologic-naïve cohort had higher drug survival than those in the biologic-experienced cohort (74.9% vs 61.7%), while HLA-Cw6–positive and HLA-Cw6–negative patients showed similar drug survival (69.3% and 71.9%). After 42 months, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 was achieved by 79.6% of patients overall; with a similar proportion of biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients achieving PASI90 (79.8% and 79.1%). The mean absolute PASI score reduced from 21.94 to 1.38 in the overall population, 21.90 to 1.24 in biologic-naïve and 22.03 to 1.77 in biologic-experienced patients after 42 months. The decrease in the absolute PASI score was comparable between HLA-Cw6–positive and HLA–Cw6-negative patients. The baseline Dermatology Life Quality Index scores also decreased in the overall patients (10.5 to 2.32) and across all study sub-groups after 42 months. Safety was consistent with the known profile of secukinumab, with no new findings.Conclusion: In this real-world cohort study, secukinumab showed consistently high long-term drug survival and effectiveness with a favourable safety profile.Keywords: psoriasis, secukinumab, real-world evidence, drug survival, SUPREME

Cyclosporine A (CsA) is one of the systemic therapeutic options for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, based on its efficacy and rapidity of action. The current study investigated the response to CsA in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. TRANSITION was an observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study which evaluated the proportion of partial- and suboptimal-responders among patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with continuous CsA for ≥12 weeks. Patients demonstrating a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response of ≥90, ≥75 and <90, ≥50 and <75 and <50 were defined as responders, suboptimal-responders, partial-responders, and non-responders, respectively. A total of 196 patients (mean age, 46.6 years; 62.8% males) from 14 sites in Italy were evaluated. At the study visit, the mean (SD) PASI score was 4.2(5.5) compared with 15.3(7.1) prior to the last CsA cycle. For response categories, 39.8%, 22.4%, 16.8%, and 20.9% of patients were responders, suboptimal-responders, partial-responders, and non-responders to CsA treatment. Overall, 28.6% of patients permanently discontinued treatment with CsA (lack of efficacy [10.2%], poor tolerability and voluntary discontinuation [3.6% each], and other [11.7%]). Patients were only partially satisfied with CsA treatment, reporting measurable impact on quality of life. Only 40% patients showed a satisfactory response to CsA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of British Journal of Dermatology is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Summary: This study from Italy looked at the response of adults with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis to secukinumab, a form of treatment known as a human monoclonal antibody, and in particular whether people with a specific gene called HLA‐Cw6 did better or worse. Individuals with this gene are 10 times more likely to develop psoriasis, and their psoriasis is more likely to start early in life and be more severe. Another human monoclonal antibody, ustekinumab, has been shown to produce a quicker and better response in people with the HLA‐Cw6 gene than without. The particular type of psoriasis under investigation in this study was the one where people have long‐lasting large, red, raised, flat areas of psoriasis with a silvery scale (chronic plaque psoriasis). The study confirmed a couple of things that were known already: for instance, that secukinumab is a very effective treatment that works quickly. Also, as one would expect, the group of patients with the HLA‐Cw6 gene were, on average, younger than the group without, and their psoriasis had started at a younger age. With regard to the HLA‐Cw6 gene itself, it was tested for in 431 of the 434 patients originally enrolled into the study. Thirty‐two patients dropped out. Of the remainder, the 227 patients with the HLA‐Cw6 gene did no better after 24 weeks' secukinumab treatment than the 172 without it. In other words, secukinumab appeared to be equally effective in both groups, and there seems to be no reason to test for the gene before starting treatment. Linked Article: Costanzo et al. Br J Dermatol 2018; 179:1072–1080 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: In multiple sclerosis (MS), MRI markers can measure the potential neuroprotective effects of fingolimod beyond its anti-inflammatory activity. In this study we aimed to comprehensively explore, in the real-word setting, whether fingolimod not only reduces clinical/MRI inflammatory activity, but also influences the progression of irreversible focal and whole brain damage in relapsing-remitting [RR] MS patients., Methods: The "EVOLUTION" study, a 24-month observational, prospective, single-arm, multicenter study, enrolled 261 RRMS patients who started fingolimod at 32 Italian MS centers and underwent biannual neurological assessments and annual MRI evaluations. Study outcomes included the proportions of evaluable RRMS patients achieving at 24 months: (1) no new/enlarging T 2 -hyperintense white matter (WM) lesions and/or clinical relapses; (2) a modified classification of "No Evidence of Disease Activity 4" ("modified NEDA-4") defined as no new/enlarging T 2 -hyperintense WM lesions, clinical relapses, and 6-month confirmed disability progression, and a yearly percentage lateral ventricular volume change on T 2 -FLAIR images < 2%; (3) less than 40% of active lesions at baseline and month 12 evolving to permanent black holes (PBHs)., Results: At month 24, 76/160 (47.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 39.8%;55.2%) RRMS patients had no clinical/MRI activity. Thirty-nine of 170 RRMS patients (22.9%; 95% CI = 16.6%;29.3%) achieved "modified NEDA-4" status. Forty-four of 72 RRMS patients (61.1%; 95% CI = 49.8%;72.4%) had less than 40% of active WM lesions evolving to PBHs. The study confirmed the established safety and tolerability profile of fingolimod., Discussion: By comparing our results with those from the literature, the EVOLUTION study seems to indicate a neuroprotective effect of fingolimod, limiting inflammatory activity, brain atrophy and PBH development., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: We aimed to explore whether erenumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, could exert a central effect on brain network function in migraine, and investigate the persistence of such an effect following treatment discontinuation., Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a crossover design performed in adult episodic migraine patients with previous treatment failure. Patients were randomized (1:1) to 12 weeks of erenumab 140 mg or placebo, followed by a 12-week crossover. Resting state (RS) functional connectivity (FC) changes of brain networks involved in migraine were investigated using a seed-based correlation approach., Results: Sixty-one patients were randomized to treatment. In each treatment sequence, 27 patients completed the visit at week 12. Forty-four enrolled patients, 22 in each treatment sequence, completed the study procedures with no major protocol violations. We observed a carry-over effect of erenumab during the placebo treatment and therefore data analysis was performed as a parallel comparison of erenumab vs placebo of the first 12 weeks of treatment. From baseline to week 12, compared to placebo, patients receiving erenumab showed RS FC changes within the cerebellar, thalamic and periaqueductal gray matter networks, significantly associated with clinical improvement. Compared to non-responders, patients achieving a 50% reduction in migraine days had distinct patterns of thalamic and visual network RS FC. Brain RS FC changes reversed when erenumab was stopped. A lower baseline RS FC of the pontine network identified patients responding to erenumab., Conclusion: Erenumab modulates RS FC of networks involved in migraine pathophysiology. In line with clinical response, erenumab-induced brain RS FC changes tend to reverse when treatment is stopped., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, neutralizes interleukin-17A, a cornerstone cytokine driving the multiple manifestations of psoriasis. This post-hoc analysis of the SUPREME study was performed to determine the sustainability of response to secukinumab in terms of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Based on PASI 90 response at week 16, patients were stratified as PASI 90 responders (PASI90R, n = 337) or non-responders (PASI90NR, n = 72). At week 20, 94.2% (n = 295/313) achieved PASI 90/100 response in PASI90R, with response maintained through week 48 (89.6%, n = 189/211). An increased proportion of patients achieved PASI 90/100 response in PASI90NR (week 20: 29.9%, n = 20/67; week 48: 57.1%, n = 20/35). Overall, 64.4% patients achieved absolute PASI score = 0 at week 24 with response sustained to week 48 (66.9%). Secukinumab showed sustained and stable efficacy in maintaining PASI 90 response in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis up to week 48.

Background: Achieving minimal disease activity (MDA) represents an ambitious and sustainable therapeutic goal in psoriasis. Clear criteria for defining MDA in psoriasis are lacking., Objectives: The primary outcome was to evaluate the effect of 300 mg secukinumab in achieving MDA in patients with psoriasis and identify the most useful criteria to define MDA in such patients. The secondary outcome was to identify clinical factors influencing MDA., Materials & Methods: In this post hoc analysis of the SUPREME study, in which 433 patients were enrolled, MDA was assessed using established criteria: ≥90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 (MDA-1), PASI score ≤1 or body surface area (BSA) <3% (MDA-2), or Investigator Global Assessment x BSA (MDA-1a and MDA-2a), for which cut-off values were obtained in patients achieving MDA-1 and MDA-2, respectively., Results: After 16 weeks of secukinumab, 65% and 76% of the evaluable population achieved MDA-1 and MDA-2, respectively; at Week 24, this was 70% and 83%. Factors that positively influenced MDA at Week 16 were younger age, lower weight and body mass index, absence of depression and anxiety, and lower serum levels of complement C3 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. MDA-1a and MDA-2a were achieved by 64% and 74% of patients at Week 16 and by 70% and 81% at Week 24, respectively., Conclusion: Patients treated with secukinumab achieved high levels of MDA at Weeks 16 and 24, regardless of the method used to calculate MDA.

Background: A significant proportion of patients with severe asthma may also suffer from nasal polyposis, which is commonly defined as chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), the presence of which may adversely affect asthma treatment outcomes. The biologic agent omalizumab is effective as add-on therapy in patients with severe allergic asthma. The aim of this post hoc analysis of the PROXIMA study was to compare the efficacy of omalizumab between patients with severe allergic asthma, with and without comorbid CRSwNP., Methods: PROXIMA was a prospective observational 2-part study conducted in Italy in adult patients with severe allergic asthma, where, in the second part, patients eligible for add-on omalizumab initiated treatment for 12 months. Patient baseline data such as comorbidities and history of exacerbations were collected. Outcomes were asthma control (Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ]), lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV 1 ]) and exacerbation rate. The post hoc analysis compared these outcomes between the cohort with comorbid CRSwNP and the cohort without CRSwNP., Results: Of 123 patients included in this analysis, 17 (13.8%) were in the CRSwNP cohort. There was no significant difference between cohorts in baseline clinical characteristics or in change from baseline at 12 months in ACQ values,  % of predicted FEV 1 or annual asthma exacerbation rate, although results were numerically in favor of the CRSwNP cohort versus the non-CRSwNP cohort. The proportion of patients who achieved an improvement in all three outcomes was numerically greater in the CRSwNP cohort (35.7% vs 23.0%)., Conclusions: In an observational real-world setting, add-on omalizumab for severe allergic asthma was effective in improving asthma control, lung function and in reducing exacerbations, including in those patients with CRSwNP., Competing Interests: Competing interestsEnrico Heffler is an advisory board member and speaker for Novartis, AstraZeneca, Sanofi-Genzyme, GSK, Teva, Circassia, and Nestlè Purina. Fabiana Saccheri and Marta Bartezaghi are employees of Novartis. Giorgio Walter Canonica has received research grants, as well as lecture or advisory board fees, from A. Menarini, Alk-Abello, Allergy Therapeutics, Anallergo, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Circassia, Danone, Faes, Genentech, Guidotti-Malesci, GlaxoSmithKline, Hal Allergy, Merck, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Orion, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi, Genzyme/Regeneron, Stallergenes, UCB Pharma, Uriach Pharma, Teva, Thermo Fisher, and Valeas., (© The Author(s) 2020.)

Objective: To assess patient-reported outcomes after two years of use of dual oral anti-diabetes drug (OAD) therapy in elderly people (≥65 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from Italy under real-life settings. Methods: 3-AGE was a prospective, non-interventional study in elderly people with T2DM inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy (defined as glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] 7.0-9.0%), in whom a second OAD was prescribed. Primary endpoint was to assess the physical and psychological symptoms associated with T2DM from baseline to 24 months using the Diabetes Symptom Check List revised (DSC-R) questionnaire. Patient's quality of life and health status, treatment satisfaction, consumption of healthcare resources, and physician satisfaction with treatment were also assessed (secondary endpoints) using validated questionnaires. Additionally, safety and clinical characteristics were also evaluated. Results: The mean age of the study population (N = 860) was 71.5 ± 5.2 years. Addition of a second OAD significantly ( p  < .0001) reduced the DSC-R score from baseline (0.73 ± 0.68) to both Months 12 and 24 (0.63 ± 0.59 and 0.61 ± 0.56), and HbA1c from baseline (7.72% ± 0.54%) to Month 12 (6.95% ± 0.82%). Adding a second OAD improved quality of life and health status (baseline, 71.31 ± 15.16 to Month 12, 74.49 ± 13.64; p  < .0001), patient's treatment satisfaction ( p  < .0001), and consumption of healthcare resources per patient. Physicians expressed good satisfaction with patients' treatment (across efficacy, tolerability and compliance domains) at Month 12. Overall, 32 adverse reactions (in 24 patients) and four hypoglycemic episodes were reported during the 24 months. Conclusion: Addition of a second OAD improved physical and psychological symptoms associated with T2DM and was well tolerated in elderly people under real-life settings.

Background: Patients with severe allergic asthma (SAA) when treated with omalizumab may exhibit different extent of response. Identifying biomarkers that can predict the extent of treatment effectiveness in patients can be useful in personalizing omalizumab treatment., Methods: Patients from the longitudinal phase of the PROXIMA study were selected for this ancillary study. After 12 months of omalizumab treatment, patients were categorized according to their response to treatment as: "clinical responder" (Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ] total score <1 at Month 12 and/or with a reduction in number of exacerbation versus the previous year); "functional responder" (an increment of ≥0.1 L in forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV 1 ] at Month 12 versus baseline); and "super responder" (among clinical responders group, who also showed a functional response). Plasma galectin-3 (GAL-3) levels were quantified using a micro titer plate-based enzyme linked immunosorbent assay kit., Results: The Majority of patients (86.36%) in sub-study population were identified as clinical responders. Of the total patients identified as clinical responders, 64.86% were identified as super responders . A statistically significant difference in the baseline plasma GAL-3 levels between responders and non-responders was observed only in the functional responders group ( P  = 0.0446). Patients with plasma GAL-3 level of ≥11 ng/mL had a greater probability of being a super responder ( P  = 0.0118) or a functional responder ( P  = 0.0032)., Conclusion: Our findings support the use of plasma GAL-3 as a predictive marker to stratify responders and identify super responders and functional responders to omalizumab treatment in patients with severe allergic asthma using less invasive sample like plasma., Competing Interests: AMR, PLM, LDF, RR, DDS, GWC have no competing interests. FS and MB are employees of Novartis., (© 2019 The Authors.)

Fingolimod exerts its therapeutic effect in multiple sclerosis by modulating sphingosine-1P receptors which are expressed in the heart mediating fingolimod first dose effects. Understanding potential interactions of baseline characteristics and autonomic profile with fingolimod first dose effects may add novel safety information and help explain cases requiring extension of the 6-hour ECG monitoring period. We aimed at characterizing the patient population treated with the first dose of fingolimod in clinical practice in an observational, multicenter, prospective 6-hours (up to 24) study. ECG was recorded for 15 min before first fingolimod administration and for 6 h after. Heart rate (HR) and HR variability in the frequency domain were derived from ECG traces. Out of the 625 enrolled patients, 580 (92.8%) were discharged at the sixth hour after fingolimod first dose; 45 (7.2%) required monitoring extension. Data confirm the well characterized cardiovascular fingolimod profile upon treatment initiation. Ten (1.6%) patients showed an atrioventricular block, all asymptomatic and self-resolving. Normalized spectral power in the High Frequency band (marking vagal modulation) and previous annualized relapse rate were independently correlated with the probability of undergoing extended monitoring. Our results could provide useful information for the stratification and individualized monitoring of MS patients prescribed with fingolimod., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Purpose: To evaluate criteria driving retreatment with ranibizumab in Italian patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV)., Methods: OLIMPIC was a 12-month, phase IIIb, open-label study. Patients with active mCNV were treated with ranibizumab 0.5 mg according to the European label. The study assessed local criteria in Italy driving retreatment decisions with ranibizumab; and the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ranibizumab., Results: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of treated patients (N = 200) was 61.8 (12.7) years; range 22-85 years. The multivariate regression model indicated that presence of active leakage (odds ratio [OR] 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.30 [1.03-124.14]), presence of intraretinal fluid (OR [95%CI]: 28.21 [1.55-513.73]), and an improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline < 10 letters (OR [95%CI]: 17.60 [1.39-222.75]) were the factors with the greatest effect on retreatment with ranibizumab. The mean (SD) BCVA gain from baseline to month 12 was 8.4 (12.8) letters (P < 0.0001). The mean (SD) number of injections was 2.41 (1.53); range 1-9. Ocular and non-ocular adverse events were reported in 41 (20.5%) and 30 (15.0%) patients, respectively., Conclusions: Individualized treatment with ranibizumab was effective in improving BCVA in patients with mCNV over 12 months. Both anatomical and functional variables had significant effects on causing retreatment. There were no new safety findings., Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT No: NCT02034006).

Background: Several documents and guidelines provide recommendations for effective management of COPD patients. However, there is often a significant imbalance between recommended treatment of COPD patients and the actual care provided both in primary care and specialty setting. This imbalance could result in a significant negative impact on patients' health status and quality of life, leading to increased hospitalisations and health resource utilisation in COPD patients METHODS: MISTRAL was an observational, longitudinal, prospective cohort study, designed to assess the overall pharmacological approach of COPD in routine clinical practice in Italy. Eligible patients were divided into two cohorts based on their exacerbation history in the year prior to the enrolment, frequent exacerbators (FEs; ≥2 exacerbations), and non-frequent exacerbators (NFEs; ≤1 exacerbation). The primary objective was to assess adherence to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2011 treatment recommendations in FEs and NFEs at baseline and follow-up visits RESULTS: Of the 1489 enrolled patients, 1468 (98.6%; FEs, 526; NFEs, 942) were considered evaluable for analyses. At baseline, 57.8% of patients were treated according to GOLD 2011 recommendations; a greater proportion of FEs were treated according to GOLD recommendations, compared with NFEs patients at baseline (77.1% versus 46.7%; P < 0.0001), and all study visits. At baseline, GOLD group D patients were the most adherent (81.2%) to treatment recommendations, while group A patients were the least adherent (30.3%) at baseline, attributed mainly to overuse of inhaled corticosteroids in less severe GOLD groups. Triple therapy with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) + long-acting β 2 -agonist/inhaled corticosteroid (LABA/ICS) was the most frequent prescribed treatment at all study visits, irrespective of patient's exacerbation history. Changes in treatment were more frequent in FEs versus NFEs CONCLUSIONS: The Mistral study reports a scarce adherence to the GOLD 2011 treatment recommendations in routine clinical practice in Italy. The adherence was particularly low in less severe, non-frequent exacerbating patients mostly for ICS overuse, and was higher in high-risk, frequent exacerbating COPD patients., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Understanding genetic variations is important in predicting treatment response and forms the basis for identifying new pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic targets for psoriasis treatment. There are limited data on the efficacy of secukinumab in relation to genetic markers., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 300 mg in HLA-Cw6-positive (Cw6-POS) and HLA-Cw6-negative (Cw6-NEG) patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis., Methods: SUPREME was a 24-week, phase IIIb study with an extension period up to 72 weeks. Primary end point was Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 response rate after 16 weeks., Results: In total, 434 patients were recruited: 185 (42·6%) were Cw6-POS and 246 (56·7%) were Cw6-NEG (three not assessed). Mean ± SD age was 45·2 ± 13·2 years (Cw6-POS 42·7 ± 13·1; Cw6-NEG 47·2 ± 12·9). The baseline PASI score was comparable between the cohorts [Cw6-POS 20·7 ± 8·99; Cw6-NEG 21·5 ± 9·99 (P = 0·777)]. At week 16, PASI 90 was achieved in 80·4% of Cw6-POS and 79·7% of Cw6-NEG patients (difference 0·76; 95% confidence interval -7·04 to 8·23). No differences in absolute PASI at week 16 (Cw6-POS 1·36 ± 3·58; Cw6-NEG 1·18 ± 2·29) were observed. The overall safety profile of secukinumab was consistent with that previously reported. No statistically significant difference was detected in the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events [Cw6-POS 42·7%; Cw6-NEG 49·6% (P = 0·295)]. A high PASI 90 response was achieved with secukinumab with a fast reduction in absolute PASI., Conclusions: Determination of HLA-Cw6 status for secukinumab therapy is unnecessary, as it is highly effective regardless of HLA-Cw6 status., (© 2018 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)

Background: Data on the prevalence of perennial versus seasonal allergic asthma in Italy are lacking; moreover, there is limited evidence on the effect of omalizumab on patient-reported outcomes in Italian patients with severe allergic asthma. PROXIMA, an observational, multicenter study, was designed to assess the prevalence of perennial versus seasonal allergic asthma (cross-sectional phase) and the effect of omalizumab on improving illness perception, quality of life (QoL) and asthma control of Italian patients with severe allergic asthma (longitudinal phase)., Methods: The study included a cross-sectional phase ( n  = 357) and a longitudinal phase ( n  = 123): during the longitudinal phase, patients received omalizumab (75-600 mg subcutaneously every month) and were followed-up for 12 months. The primary parameter of cross-sectional phase was prevalence of perennial allergic asthma and that of longitudinal phase was proportion of patients with asthma control (assessed using asthma control questionnaire [ACQ]). Secondary parameters assessed were patients' disease perception, level of asthma control, exacerbation rate during both cross-sectional and longitudinal phases, and patients' compliance to and persistence with omalizumab, and patients' QoL during the longitudinal phase., Results: Most patients (95.8%) had perennial allergies; 81% had polysensitization. Of 99 patients in the per-protocol set, 95 (95.96% [95% CI: 89.98-98.89%]) achieved asthma control (ACQ < 4) at both 6 and 12 months of omalizumab treatment; ACQ score decreased after 6 and 12 months ( P  < 0.0001). Omalizumab treatment resulted in a significant improvement in QoL and patients' illness perception and 87% decrease in exacerbation rate. The compliance rate with omalizumab was high (73.2%). No new safety signals were identified during treatment., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that in severe allergic asthma, omalizumab improves patient-reported outcomes such as patients' illness perception and QoL, while confirming improvement of asthma control and exacerbation rate reduction in Italian patients., Competing Interests: The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and the AIFA Guideline for classification and management of observational studies on drugs. All patients provided informed consent before participating in the study.Not applicable.Giorgio Walter Canonica reports having received research grants as well as lecture or advisory board fees from A. Menarini, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Genentech, Guidotti-Malesci, Glaxo Smith Kline, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva. Paola Rottoli reports receiving personal fees and other from Roche, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from TEVA, other from Menarini, from null, outside the submitted work. Bruno Macciocchi reports receiving grants from Boehringer Ingelheim. Pierachille Santus reports receiving personal fees from Astra Zeneca, grants and personal fees from Boehringer ingelheim, grants from Almirall, grants and personal fees from Chiesi Farmaceutici, personal fees from Guidotti, personal fees from GSK, personal fees from Zambon Italia, outside the submitted work. Marta Bartezaghi and Laura Rigoni are the employees of Novartis.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Background: A high treatment burden with nebulised therapies in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients is the major limitation for treatment compliance; moreover, studies on treatment compliance with inhaled antibiotics are limited. This study assessed compliance to TOBI ® Podhaler™ (TIP) treatment in CF patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) infections in a real-world setting using the Italian Treatment Adherence CF Questionnaire (ITA-CFq)., Methods: This longitudinal, multicentre, cohort study included 2 follow-up (FU) visits: FU-1 at 3-months±15-days from the baseline visit and FU-2 at the end of third TIP cycle (or 6-months after enrolment, whichever occurred first). The effect of TIP on quality-of-life (QoL) and treatment satisfaction were evaluated using Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), respectively. Overall compliance to treatments was assessed using ITA-CFq., Results: Eighty-two patients (mean age, 24.8 ± 7.9 years), including 22 paediatric patients (age, <18 years), were enrolled in the study; 56 (68.3%) patients, including 17 paediatric patients, completed the study. At baseline, the mean compliance score to aerosol antibiotic treatment was 7.8 ± 3.2; upon introducing TIP, the compliance score improved to 9.4 ± 1.2 at the FU-1 and thereafter remained stable at 9.5 ± 1.2. TSQM was higher for the convenience domain (74.2 ± 17.1 at enrolment and slightly improved to 77.8 ± 15.9 at FU-2) following TIP initiation. No substantial effect of TIP was observed on the QoL when measured using the revised CFQ-R. The safety profile was in line with previous findings., Conclusion: TIP was convenient to use and led to improved treatment adherence in CF patients with chronic Pa-infection., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Cognitive impairment (CI) affects 40-65% of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. This study attempted evaluating the effects of fingolimod and interferon beta-1b (IFN β-1b) on CI progression, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical outcomes in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients over 18 months. The GOLDEN study was a pilot study including RRMS patients with CI randomised (2:1) to fingolimod (0.5 mg daily)/IFN β-1b (250 µg every other day). CI was assessed via Rao's Brief Repeatable Battery and Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System test. MRI parameters, Expanded Disability Status Scale scores and relapses were measured. Overall, 157 patients were randomised, of whom 30 discontinued the study (fingolimod, 8.49%; IFN β-1b, 41.18%; p ≤ 0.0001). Patients randomised to fingolimod had more severe clinical and MRI disease characteristics at baseline compared with IFN β-1b. At Month (M) 18, both treatment groups showed improvements in all cognitive parameters. At M18, relapse rate, total number and volume of T2/T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions were higher with IFN β-1b, as well as the percentage brain volume change during the study. Safety and tolerability of both treatments were similar to previous studies. Both treatments showed improvements in cognitive parameters. Fingolimod demonstrated significantly better effects on MRI parameters and relapse rate. Imbalance in baseline characteristics and the drop-out pattern may have favoured IFN β-1b. A longer duration trial may be needed to observe the complete expression of differential effects on CI scales reflecting the between-groups differences on MRI. Although limited in size, the GOLDEN study confirms the favourable benefit-risk profile of fingolimod reported in previous studies.

Background: We designed the PROXIMA study (Patient-Reported Outcomes and Xolair(®) In the Management of Asthma) to determine the proportion of patients with severe asthma sensitive to perennial allergens, and to evaluate asthma control and treatment adherence up to 12 months in patients treated with omalizumab in Italian population. In addition, an ancillary study was designed to explore protein biomarkers and characterize them in relation to severe allergic asthma and treatment effects by proteomic approach., Methods: PROXIMA is an observational, multicenter, cross-sectional and prospective cohort study conducted at 25 centers in Italy, in outpatient settings. The study consists of two phases: 1) a cross-sectional phase plans to enroll 600 patients with severe allergic asthma, in step 4 therapy as per GINA guidelines, aged ≥18 years, needing a step up in therapy, and 2) a longitudinal phase on patients who will start omalizumab add-on therapy per clinician's judgment at baseline visit (approximately 180-240 patients). The primary variable of the cross-sectional phase is the proportion of patients with severe asthma presenting with perennial form of allergy (skin prick test or in vitro test). The primary variable of longitudinal phase is proportion of patients who achieve disease control (assessed by Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ]) with omalizumab at 6 months, and maintain it at 12 months. Secondary variables are patient compliance to omalizumab, patient-reported perception of cognitive and emotional impact of the illness, assessed by Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ) and the health related quality of life evaluated by the EuroQoL 5D-3 L (EQ-5D-3 L). Safety endpoints will be recorded during the course of the study. Patients participating in the longitudinal phase will be enrolled for ancillary study if they provide additional informed consent. Protein species in complex mixtures will be identified using innovative MudPIT (Multidimensional Protein Identification Technology) method., Conclusions: The results of this observational study will provide estimate of patient population allergic to perennial allergens in Italy and information on patient-reported outcomes with omalizumab therapy in a real-world setting. The exploratory proteomic analysis on asthma biomarkers could eventually provide new data to identify responder patients to anti IgE therapy.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate post-marketing efficacy and safety data for therapy with daptomycin (DAP) in Italy. Data from patients treated with DAP at 30 centres between January 2006 and July 2009 were analysed according to the protocol of the EU-CORE(SM). In 359 patients, DAP was most commonly prescribed for skin and skin-structure infections (55%), infective endocarditis (13%), and bacteraemia (12.5%). DAP was associated with rapid improvement, and clinical success rates ranging from 77 to 91%, despite almost half of the patient population being ≥65 years of age, 86% having significant underlying disease, and many being affected by drug-resistant pathogens. Staphylococcus aureus represented 35% of all pathogens isolated. Success rates for all staphylococcal and enterococcal infections were >80%, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Clinical outcomes were similar for DAP whether used as first- or second-line therapy. DAP was well tolerated even with prolonged treatment.

Background: In combination with everolimus (EVL), cyclosporine A (CsA) may be used at low exposure, so reducing the risk of renal dysfunction in renal transplant recipients (RTR). We evaluated whether higher exposure of EVL could allow a further reduction of CsA., Methods: De novo RTR were randomized to standard exposure EVL (C0 3-8 ng/mL) with low-concentration CsA (C2 maintenance levels 350-500 ng/mL, group A) or higher EVL exposure (C0 8-12 ng/mL) with very low-concentration CsA (C2 maintenance levels 150-300 ng/mL, group B). The primary endpoints were 6-month creatinine clearance (CrCl) and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) rate. After 6 months, patients were followed up (observational extension) to 12 months., Results: Two hundred eighty-five RTR (97% from deceased donors) were enrolled. Two patients per group died (1.4%). The 6-month death-censored graft survival was 90.2% in group A and 97.9% in group B and was unchanged at 12 months (P=0.007). There was no significant difference between groups at 6 months in CrCl (59.9 vs. 57.8 mL/min) and BPAR rates (14.7% vs. 11.9%) and also at 12 months (CrCl 62.5+/-20.7 vs. 61.3+/-22.0 mL/min, BPAR 14.7% vs. 14.1%). No significant differences were seen in treated acute rejections, steroid-resistant acute rejections, treatment failures, or delayed graft function, although there was a trend to better results in group B., Conclusions: EVL given at higher exposure for 6 months plus very low CsA concentration may obtain low acute rejection rate and good graft survival in De novo renal transplantation. However, there was no difference between groups in CrCl.

This observational study was performed to identify the clinical reasons leading physicians to opt for immediate or progressive procedures when switching patients from carbamazepine to oxcarbazepine, and to evaluate the clinical feasibility of the two procedures in a general unselected patient population. Five hundred and twenty-seven patients (aged 14 years or older, treated with carbamazepine as monotherapy or in combination therapy) were recruited at 50 Italian centres and freely assigned to immediate (n=361) or progressive (n=166) switch procedures. Vital and clinical data (including seizure frequency) were comparable in the two groups at baseline. The proportion of patients with simple partial seizures only was significantly higher in the immediate group (immediate: 33.0% vs progressive: 23.5%, p=0.0275), whereas the proportion of patients on combination therapy was slightly higher in the progressive group (immediate: 47.1 vs progressive: 55.4%, p=0.0756). At the end of the switch period, overall treatment satisfaction was greater in the immediate switch group, both in patients (p<0.002) and physicians (p<0.0005). Physicians preferred the immediate over the progressive switch procedure. The only clinical features of patients found to relate to the physician?s choice of switch procedure were simple partial seizures only (favouring the immediate switch) and, possibly, combination therapy with other anti-epileptic drugs (favouring the progressive switch). "Overnight" switching from carbamazepine to oxcarbazepine also appears feasible in most patients on polytherapy.