Search

The PharmacoScan pharmacogenomics platform screens for variation in genes that affect drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination, immune adverse reactions and targets. Among the 1,191 genes tested on the platform, 12 genes are expressed in the red cell membrane: ABCC1, ABCC4, ABCC5, ABCG2, CFTR, SLC16A1, SLC19A1, SLC29A1, ATP7A, CYP4F3, EPHX1 and FLOT1. These genes represent 5 ATP-binding cassette proteins, 3 solute carrier proteins, 1 ATP transport protein and 3 genes associated with drug metabolism and adverse drug reactions. Only ABCG2 and SLC29A1 encode blood group systems, JR and AUG, respectively. We propose red cells as an ex vivo model system to study the effect of heritable variants in genes encoding the transport proteins on the pharmacokinetics of drugs. Altered pharmacodynamics in red cells could also cause adverse reactions, such as haemolysis, hitherto unexplained by other mechanisms.

The Oncology Pharmacy Team (OPT), consisting of specialty-trained pharmacists and/or pharmacy technicians, is an integral component of the multidisciplinary healthcare team (MHT) involved with all aspects of cancer patient care. The OPT fosters quality patient care, safety, and local regulatory compliance. The International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) developed this position statement to provide guidance on five key areas: 1) oncology pharmacy practice as a pharmacy specialty; 2) contributions to patient care; 3) oncology pharmacy practice management; 4) education and training; and 5) contributions to oncology research and quality initiatives to involve the OPT. This position statement advocates that: 1) the OPT be fully incorporated into the MHT to optimize patient care; 2) educational and healthcare institutions develop programs to continually educate OPT members; and 3) regulatory authorities develop certification programs to recognize the unique contributions of the OPT in cancer patient care.

The National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (NIH CC) is the largest hospital in the United States devoted entirely to clinical research, with a highly diverse spectrum of patients. Patient safety and clinical quality is a major goal of the hospital, and therapy is often complicated by multiple cotherapies and comorbidities. To this end, we implemented a pharmacogenomics program in two phases. In the first phase, we implemented genotyping for HLA-A and HLA-B gene variations with clinical decision support (CDS) for abacavir, carbamazepine, and allopurinol. In the second phase, we implemented genotyping for drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters (DMET): SLCO1B1 for CDS of simvastatin and TPMT for CDS of mercaptopurine, azathioprine, and thioguanine. The purpose of this review is to describe the implementation process, which involves clinical, laboratory, informatics, and policy decisions pertinent to the NIH CC.

GNE myopathy is a rare, autosomal recessive, inborn error of sialic acid metabolism, caused by mutations in GNE, the gene encoding UDP-N-acetyl-glucosamine-2-epimerase/N-acetylmannosamine kinase. The disease manifests as an adult-onset myopathy characterized by progressive skeletal muscle weakness and atrophy. There is no medical therapy available for this debilitating disease. Hyposialylation of muscle glycoproteins likely contributes to the pathophysiology of this disease. N-acetyl-D-mannosamine (ManNAc), an uncharged monosaccharide and the first committed precursor in the sialic acid biosynthetic pathway, is a therapeutic candidate that prevents muscle weakness in the mouse model of GNE myopathy. We conducted a first-in-human, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single-ascending dose study to evaluate safety and pharmacokinetics of ManNAc in GNE myopathy subjects. Single doses of 3 and 6g of oral ManNAc were safe and well tolerated; 10g was associated with diarrhea likely due to unabsorbed ManNAc. Oral ManNAc was absorbed rapidly and exhibited a short half-life (~2.4h). Following administration of a single dose of ManNAc, there was a significant and sustained increase in plasma unconjugated free sialic acid (Neu5Ac) (Tmax of 8-11h). Neu5Ac levels remained above baseline 48h post-dose in subjects who received a dose of 6 or 10g. Given that Neu5Ac is known to have a short half-life, the prolonged elevation of Neu5Ac after a single dose of ManNAc suggests that intracellular biosynthesis of sialic acid was restored in subjects with GNE myopathy, including those homozygous for mutations in the kinase domain. Simulated plasma concentration-time profiles support a dosing regimen of 6g twice daily for future clinical trials.

Purpose Results of a study to determine the stability of tacrolimus solutions stored in polyolefin containers under various temperature conditions are reported. Methods Triplicate solutions of tacrolimus (0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 mg/mL) in 0.9% sodium chloride injection or 5% dextrose injection were prepared in polyolefin containers. Some samples were stored at room temperature (20–25 °C); others were refrigerated (2–8 °C) for 20 hours and then stored at room temperature for up to 28 hours. The solutions were analyzed by stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay at specified time points over 48 hours. Solution pH was measured and containers were visually inspected at each time point. Stability was defined as retention of at least 90% of the initial tacrolimus concentration. Results All tested solutions retained over 90% of the initial tacrolimus concentration at all time points, with the exception of the 0.001-mg/mL solution prepared in 0.9% sodium chloride injection, which was deemed unstable beyond 24 hours. At all evaluated concentrations, mean solution pH values did not change significantly over 48 hours; no particle formation was detected. Conclusion During storage in polyolefin bags at room temperature, a 0.001-mg/mL solution of tacrolimus was stable for 24 hours when prepared in 0.9% sodium chloride injection and for at least 48 hours when prepared in 5% dextrose injection. Solutions of 0.01 and 0.1 mg/mL prepared in either diluent were stable for at least 48 hours, and the 0.01-mg/mL tacrolimus solution was also found to be stable throughout a sequential temperature protocol.

The variant allele HLA‐B*15:02 is strongly associated with greater risk of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) in patients treated with carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine. The variant allele HLA‐A*31:01 is associated with greater risk of maculopapular exanthema, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and SJS/TEN in patients treated with carbamazepine. We summarize evidence from the published literature supporting these associations and provide recommendations for carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine use based on HLA genotypes.

The purposes of these guidelines are to define best practices for the safe use of chemotherapy and biotherapy agents and to assist practitioners in improving their medication-use systems to prevent medication errors and patient harm from these agents. Although the guidelines are intended primarily

Purpose The 24-hour stability of alemtuzumab solutions prepared at concentrations not included in the product label and stored in glass or polyolefin containers at room temperature was evaluated. Methods Triplicate solutions of alemtuzumab (6.67, 40, and 120 μg/mL) in 0.9% sodium chloride were prepared in either glass bottles or polyolefin containers and stored at room temperature under normal fluorescent lighting conditions. The solutions were analyzed by a validated stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay at time zero and 8, 14, and 24 hours after preparation; solution pH values were measured and the containers visually inspected at all time points. Stability was defined as the retention of ≥90% of the initial alemtuzumab concentration. Results HPLC analysis indicated that the percentage of the initial alemtuzumab concentration retained was >90% for all solutions evaluated, with no significant changes over the study period. The most dilute alemtuzumab solution (6.67 μg/mL) showed some degradation (91% of the initial concentration retained at hour 24), whereas the retained concentration was >99% for all other preparations throughout the study period. Solution pH values varied by drug concentration but did not change significantly over 24 hours. No evidence of particle formation was detected in any solution by visual inspection at any time during the study. Conclusion Solutions of alemtuzumab 6.67 μg/mL stored in glass bottles and solutions of 40 and 120 μg/mL stored in polyolefin containers were stable for at least 24 hours at room temperature.

Purpose: P-glycoprotein (Pgp) antagonists have had unpredictable pharmacokinetic interactions requiring reductions of chemotherapy. We report a phase I study using tariquidar (XR9576), a potent Pgp antagonist, in combination with vinorelbine. Experimental Design: Patients first received tariquidar alone to assess effects on the accumulation of 99mTc-sestamibi in tumor and normal organs and rhodamine efflux from CD56+ mononuclear cells. In the first cycle, vinorelbine pharmacokinetics was monitored after the day 1 and 8 doses without or with tariquidar. In subsequent cycles, vinorelbine was administered with tariquidar. Tariquidar pharmacokinetics was studied alone and with vinorelbine. Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8 was identified as the maximum tolerated dose (neutropenia). Nonhematologic grade 3/4 toxicities in 77 cycles included the following: abdominal pain (4 cycles), anorexia (2), constipation (2), fatigue (3), myalgia (2), pain (4) and dehydration, depression, diarrhea, ileus, nausea, and vomiting, (all once). A 150-mg dose of tariquidar: (1) reduced liver 99mTc-sestamibi clearance consistent with inhibition of liver Pgp; (2) increased 99mTc-sestamibi retention in a majority of tumor masses visible by 99mTc-sestamibi; and (3) blocked Pgp-mediated rhodamine efflux from CD56+ cells over the 48 hours examined. Tariquidar had no effects on vinorelbine pharmacokinetics. Vinorelbine had no effect on tariquidar pharmacokinetics. One patient with breast cancer had a minor response, and one with renal carcinoma had a partial remission. Conclusions: Tariquidar is a potent Pgp antagonist, without significant side effects and much less pharmacokinetic interaction than previous Pgp antagonists. Tariquidar offers the potential to increase drug exposure in drug-resistant cancers.

The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines for HLA-B*58:01 Genotype and Allopurinol Dosing was originally published in February 2013. We reviewed the recent literature and concluded that none of the evidence would change the therapeutic recommendations in the original guideline; therefore, the original publication remains clinically current. However, we have updated the Supplemental Material and included additional resources for applying CPIC guidelines into the electronic health record. Up-to-date information can be found at PharmGKB (http://www.pharmgkb.org).

The full guidelines appear in the online version of this issue ([www.ajhp.org][1]). Despite the publishing of the ASHP Guidelines on Preventing Medication Errors with Antineoplastic Agents in 2002,[1][2] medication errors with chemotherapy and biotherapy have continued to occur. With evolving

Delivering standard-dose chemotherapy on schedule is important for survival in early-stage breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Trials of dose-escalated regimens, in which higher-than-standard doses of chemotherapy are used, have produced equivocal results. In contrast, dose-dense regimens, in which standard doses are given with shorter (usually 14-day) intervals between cycles, have been more efficacious than standard 21-day regimens in trials in both early-stage breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Furthermore, a shorter course of chemotherapy is likely to cause less disruption in patients' lives. Despite the evidence of the importance of maintaining chemotherapy dose intensity (the amount of drug administered/unit of time), undertreatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is common. Neutropenia is the primary dose-limiting toxicity of many chemotherapy regimens, and it is frequently managed by dose reductions and delays that decrease dose intensity. Colony-stimulating factors reduce the prevalence and severity of neutropenia and its complications, and their proactive use can improve adherence to the planned schedule of both standard-dose and dose-dense chemotherapy. The promising results with dose-dense chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma indicate that it should be tested in patients with other chemosensitive tumors.

BACKGROUND PSC 833 is a second-generation P-glycoprotein (Pgp) antagonist developed to reverse multidrug resistance (MDR). The authors conducted a Phase I study of orally administered PSC 833 in combination with vinblastine administered as a 5-day continuous infusion. METHODS Seventy-nine patients with advanced malignant disease were enrolled in the trial and treated with escalating doses of PSC 833. Pharmacokinetic interactions between PSC 833 and vinblastine were anticipated. Accordingly, when dose limiting toxicities were observed, the dose of vinblastine was reduced as PSC 833 was escalated. Three schedules and two formulations of PSC 833 were used in the study. RESULTS The maximum tolerated doses of PSC 833 were 12.5 mg/kg orally every 12 hours for 8 days for the liquid formulation in combination with 0.9 mg/m2 per day vinblastine as a continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) for 5 days; and 4 mg/kg orally every 6 hours for 8 days for the microemulsion formulation in combination with 0.6 mg/m2 per day vinblastine CIV for 5 days. The principal toxicities for PSC 833 were ataxia and paresthesias and for the combination, constipation, fever. and neutropenia. Increased oral bioavailability and increased peak and trough concentrations were observed with the microemulsion formulation. Significant interpatient variability in pharmacokinetic parameters was observed. Ten patients studied at the MTD for PSC 833 (4 mg/kg orally every 6 hours for 8 days) had inhibition of rhodamine efflux from CD56 positive peripheral lymphocytes as a surrogate for Pgp antagonism. Among 43 evaluable patients with clear cell carcinoma of the kidney, 3 patients had complete responses, and 1 patient had a partial response. CONCLUSIONS PSC 833 in combination with vinblastine can be administered safely to patients provided the vinblastine dose is adjusted for pharmacokinetic interactions. The high interpatient variability is a significant confounding factor. Surrogate studies with CD56 positive cells suggest that Pgp inhibition in the clinical setting is achievable. Improved methods for predicting pharmacokinetic interactions should improve future studies. Cancer 2001;92:1577–90. © 2001 American Cancer Society.

Objective. To provide an update about gene marking and gene therapy trials in cancer patients. Data Sources. A MEDLINE search using the term “gene therapy” was conducted for the period 1985 to 1998. The reference lists from retrieved articles were reviewed. Meeting abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting (published in their proceedings) and the Annual Cancer Gene Therapy Symposium (published in Cancer Gene Therapy) that concerned gene therapy in cancer patients were also included. Data Extraction. Both authors reviewed the retrieved material and included preclinical data, case reports, and clinical trials related to gene transfer or gene therapy in cancer patients. Data Synthesis. There are several possible approaches to using gene therapy for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and for the monitoring of cancer therapy. Exogenous genes may be used to mark cells to help better understand cancer biology or may be used directly for cancer treatment. Gene-marking trials have already provided new information about cancer biology and have demonstrated that reinfused progenitor cells may be a source of relapse in patients with acute or chronic myelogenous leukemia and neuroblastoma. Approaches using gene therapy for cancer treatment include: using lymphocytes as gene carriers, using foreign genes to increase tumor immunogenicity, introducing tumor regression antigen genes into viruses, introducing “sensitivity” genes to produce new cytotoxic agent(s) within tumors, producing new protein product(s) to protect normal cells, replacing missing or mutant tumor suppressor genes, and inactivating oncogenes. Clinical trials using these strategies have demonstrated that gene transfer is feasible (albeit with low transduction efficiency) and that gene expression occurs; in addition, clinical responses have been noted.

Guidelines for describing cancer chemotherapy regi mens in all aspects of drug development, including treatment protocols, order forms, and product labels, are proposed. To complement the approaches to reducing medication errors that have been recommended by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and others, pharmacists at the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute, with the input of oncology pharmacists from diverse areas of practice, developed guidelines for expressing chemo therapy dosage schedules and treatment regimens. The guidelines present standards that are broadly applicable and can be adopted by other institutions. Clear and unambiguous expression of all medication orders and consistency of treatment descriptions are suggested. Written treatment plans and orders should contain enough information to allow health care providers from diverse disciplines to compare them with published treatment descriptions and investiga tional protocols and must therefore include planned dosages and schedules expressed in patient-specific units. In general, drug dosages should be expressed as the amount of drug administered from a single con tainer. When ordering drugs that are part of complex or combination-drug regimens, prescribers should write as many of the orders at one time as is possible so that continuity might be preserved. Standard rules are proposed for describing che motherapy regimens.

Pharmacogenetics (PG) examines gene variations for drug disposition, response, or toxicity. At the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (NIH CC), a multidepartment Pharmacogenetics Testing Implementation Committee (PGTIC) was established to develop clinical decision support (CDS) algorithms for abacavir, carbamazepine, and allopurinol, medications for which human leukocyte antigen (HLA) variants predict severe hypersensitivity reactions. Providing PG CDS in the electronic health record (EHR) during order entry could prevent adverse drug events. Medical Logic Module (MLM) programming was used to implement PG CDS in our EHR. The MLM checks to see if an HLA sequence-based gene test is ordered. A message regarding test status (result present, absent, pending, or test not ordered) is displayed on the order form, and the MLM determines if the prescriber can place the order, place it but require an over-ride reason, or be blocked from placing the order. Since implementation, more than 725 medication orders have been placed for over 230 patients by 154 different prescribers for the three drugs included in our PG program. Prescribers commonly used an over-ride reason when placing the order mainly because patients had been receiving the drug without reaction before implementation of the CDS program. Successful incorporation of PG CDS into the NIH CC EHR required a coordinated, interdisciplinary effort to ensure smooth activation and a positive effect on patient care. Prescribers have adapted to using the CDS and have ordered PG testing as a direct result of the implementation.

We conducted a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the ability of the interleukin-3/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM- CSF) fusion protein, PIXY321, to ameliorate cumulative thrombocytopenia after multiple cycles of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FLAC) chemotherapy compared with GM-CSF in patients with advanced breast cancer. Fifty-three patients were randomized to receive either PIXY321. 375 microg/m2 twice a day subcutaneously, or GM- CSF, 250 microg/m2 daily subcutaneously after FLAC chemotherapy. PIXY321 was less well tolerated than GM-CSF, with more patients developing chills and local skin reactions and more patients stopping PIXY321 due to intolerance. While no difference in the neutrophil nadirs was seen with the two cytokines, the duration of the absolute neutrophil count less than 1,000/muL for all cycles was significantly longer with PIXY321 than with GM-CSF. Fifty percent of patients treated with multiple cycles of FLAC chemotherapy on both study arms developed dose-limiting thrombocytopenia. No differences in platelet nadirs, duration of thrombocytopenia, or need for platelet transfusions were observed with PIXY321 versus GM-CSF. The average delivered doses of FLAC chemotherapy were somewhat higher in the GM-CSF study arm. PIXY321 was not superior to GM-CSF in ameliorating the cumulative thrombocytopenia observed with multiple cycles of FLAC chemotherapy and was less well tolerated.

PURPOSE In vitro data suggest that prolonged exposure to paclitaxel enhances breast cancer cytotoxicity. Our objective in this phase I study was to determine the tolerability of paclitaxel administered by 72-hour continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion (CIVI) in combination with high-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the ambulatory setting to metastatic breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Paclitaxel was administered over 72 hours by CIVI and cyclophosphamide was given daily by i.v. bolus on days 1, 2, and 3, followed by G-CSF every 21 days. The availability of ambulatory infusion pumps and paclitaxel-compatible tubing permitted outpatient administration. RESULTS Fifty-five patients with metastatic breast cancer who had been previously treated with a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens were entered onto the study. Dose-limiting toxicity of grade 4 neutropenia for longer than 5 days and grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in three of five patients treated with paclitaxel 160 mg/m2 CIVI and cyclophosphamide 3,300 mg/m2 followed by G-CSF. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was paclitaxel 160 mg/m2 CIVI and cyclophosphamide 2,700 mg/m2 in divided doses with G-CSF. Nonhematologic toxicities were moderate and included diarrhea, mucositis, and arthalgias. Although hemorrhagic cystitis developed in six patients, recurrence was prevented with i.v. and oral mesna, which permitted continued outpatient delivery. One hundred seventy-four cycles were safely administered in the ambulatory setting using infusional pumps and tubing. Objective responses occurred in 23 (one complete and 22 partial) of 42 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease (55%; 95% confidence interval, 38% to 70%), with a response rate of 73% (11 of 15) seen at the highest dose levels. CONCLUSION Paclitaxel by 72-hour CIVI with daily cyclophosphamide followed by G-CSF can be administered safely in the ambulatory setting, has acceptable toxicity, and is an active regimen in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Increasing evidence suggests that P-glycoprotein (Pgp) expression can mediate drug resistance in refractory breast cancer. We studied 33 patients with refractory breast cancer enrolled in a pilot study of oral amiodarone as a Pgp antagonist given in combination with infusional doxorubicin or vinblastine. Whenever possible, tumors were biopsied and Pgp expression was assayed. Patients received either 60 mg/m2 doxorubicin over 96 h or 8.5 mg/m2 vinblastine over 120 h by continuous intravenous infusion. Beginning with the second cycle of chemotherapy, 600-800 mg amiodarone was given orally each day. Patients who experienced toxicity due to amiodarone but were responding to chemotherapy were placed on quinidine. Partial responses were observed in 9 of 33 patients on study and were sometimes observed after the first cycle of chemotherapy, before amiodarone was given, suggesting that some patients may have responded to treatment because of the infusional schedule. Toxicities were primarily the known side effects of the antineoplastic agents and of amiodarone. The major amiodarone toxicity was gastrointestinal, with nausea, vomiting, anorexia, or diarrhea being noted in 21 patients. Biopsy samples were obtained from 29 patients and in 21 cases, viable tumor tissue was present and the results were interpretable. Of the 21 samples, 9 had Pgp expression as determined by immunohistochemical staining; 12 were considered negative. The presence of Pgp expression was associated with an acceleration of the time to treatment failure. Whereas normal-tissue toxicities related to the combination of a Pgp antagonist with chemotherapy were not observed, amiodarone was associated with too many untoward effects to be utilized as a drug resistance-reversing agent.

I was quite excited when I received the call from Dr. Henri Manasse informing me that I would be receiving the 2011 Donald E. Francke Medal. I looked over the list of previous, very well-known and accomplished recipients, and the excitement was somewhat replaced by a cloud of humbleness. I was also

Retroviral Mediated Transfer of the Human Multidrug Resistance Gene (MDR-1) into Hematopoietic Stem Cells during Autologous Transplantation after Intensive Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer P...

To develop a general method for using the alerting function of an electronic health record (EHR) system to warn prescribers when a drug order may be in conflict with the restrictions of a patient's research protocol.We examined a sample of clinical research protocols at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to identify the frequency with which drugs were excluded by protocols. We analyzed two protocols and modeled the exclusions they contained. We then developed a data model to represent the exclusions, expanded the terminology in the NIH's Biomedical Translational Research Information System (BTRIS) to include relevant drug concepts, and wrote a medical logic module (MLM) for the EHR to match terms for ordered drugs with the drug concepts in the protocol.We found that 50% of protocols in our sample included drug exclusions. Our model represented exclusion concepts and also concepts related to exemptions from the exclusions. The MLM was deployed in a test environment where it successfully detected orders for excluded drugs and delivered messages to users explaining the exclusion, providing information about the clinical setting and timing where the exclusion applies. BTRIS reports using the same terminology information were able to identify instances where protocol exceptions occurred.Drug exclusions are frequent components of research protocols; nonadherenece to these exclusions could result in harm to subjects, erroneous study results or inefficiencies due to disqualification of research subjects. Our approach uses an MLM and a simple knowledge base, together with a controlled terminology, to provide a solution to the detection and prevention of possible protocol violations. Further work is needed to model additional aspects of the exclusions, such as timing and co-occurring conditions, to improve MLM accuracy.

Background. Taxol is a novel chemotherapeutic agent that promotes microtubule assembly and stabilizes tubulin polymer formation. Clinical evaluation of its antineoplastic activity as a single agent and in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs is in progress. Methods. To evaluate the effect of combining taxol with other commonly used antineoplastic agents, clonogenic survival of human breast cancer MCF7 cells, human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells, and human ovarian cancer OVG1 cells were assayed after an initial exposure to taxol for 24 hours (approximately LD90 for taxol), followed by a 1-hour incubation with varying concentrations of doxorubicin or etoposide (total taxol incubation time, 25 hours). Results. When corrected for taxol-induced cytotoxicity, doxorubicin and etoposide caused less cell killing in the presence of taxol compared with control incubations of doxorubicin and etoposide alone. To determine if a different schedule of drug application resulted in a similar finding, MCF7, A549, and OVG1 cells were exposed to doxorubicin for 1 hour, followed by incubation with varying concentrations of taxol for 24 hours. Less-than-additive cytotoxicity for the combination of taxol and doxorubicin was found. Flow cytometry studies in MCF7 cells showed that taxol caused a G2/M cell cycle block. Fewer cells were found to be in S-phase, which is the most doxorubicin-sensitive phase of the cell cycle. The application of doxorubicin or etoposide to MCF7 cells for 1 hour resulted in partial G1 and G2/M cell cycle blocks. Fewer cells were found to be moving through the cell cycle, which is likely required for taxol cytotoxicity. Conclusion. Although direct antagonism of the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin or etoposide by taxol has not been proven, there is less-than-additive in vitro cytotoxicity when taxol is combined with these chemotherapeutic agents. The clinical implications of these findings are unknown; however, these findings generate concern about the combination of these agents in clinical trials and suggest that additional studies to determine optimal scheduling are needed.

Background. Prolonged infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and bolus 5-FU modulated by leucovorin are associated with higher response rates than bolus 5-FU alone. Cisplatin enhances 5-FU cytotoxicity in some preclinical models. Methods. The authors tested the feasibility of combining concurrent infusional leucovorin (500 mg/m2/d) with protracted infusional 5-FU (200 mg/m2/d) and weekly bolus cisplatin (20 mg/m2) in 22 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Results. Four partial responses (PR) were noticed among 21 evaluable patients (19%). The median time to treatment failure and median survival were 6 months and 11 months, respectively. All but two patients required 5-FU dose reduction after a median of 2 weeks because of mucositis. However, severe mucositis and diarrhea occurred in only 18% and 5% of the patients, respectively. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia of mild to moderate severity occurred in 55% of patients. Megaloblastic changes were evident in the peripheral blood during therapy, and may reflect prolonged DNA-directed toxicity of 5-FU. The median tolerated dose level of 5-FU was 113 mg/m2/d (range, 64–150 mg/m2/d). Mean steadystate plasma concentrations (Cpss) of 5-FU appeared to increase linearly from 0.19 μM to 0.39 μM over the dose range 64 to 200 mg/m2/d. Patients with grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity had significantly higher 5-FU Cpss than patients with grade 0 or 1 toxicity. Conclusions. The early onset of toxicity with this regimen of protracted infusional 5-FU/high-dose leucovorin and weekly cisplatin required marked attenuation of the 5-FU dose intensity, and the results were no better than that expected with infusional 5-FU alone.

Fazarabine (Arabinofuranosyl-5-azacytosine) is a synthetic pyrimidine nucleoside which combines the arabinose sugar of cytosine arabinoside with the triazine base of 5-azacytidine. It has demonstrated activity against a variety of human solid tumor xenografts including colon, lung and breast cancers. Eighteen patients with refractory metastatic colon cancer were enrolled in a phase II trial of fazarabine. The drug was administered as a 72 hr continuous infusion every 3-4 weeks; the starting dose was 2 mg/m2/hr as established in a previous phase I study. The major toxicity was neutropenia, as predicted from the phase I study. The median time to nadir for cycle 1 was 20 days, with a median granulocyte count of 437/microliters (range 36-1600/microliters); recovery was within 2-4 days, with only one incidence of fever and neutropenia in 42 cycles. Especially noted for their absence were thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting and stomatitis. No objective clinical responses were seen; one patient had stabilization of rapidly growing liver metastases for a period of 7 months. In view of fazarabine's narrow range of toxicities, future dose intensification trials utilizing fazarabine in combination with hematopoietic growth factors are worthy of consideration.

Background The standard of care for metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) is systemic chemotherapy which leads to a median survival of 6-15 months. Survival beyond 3 years is rare. For selected groups of patients with limited MGC, retrospective studies have shown improved overall survival following gastrectomy and metastasectomies including peritoneal stripping with continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP), liver resection, and pulmonary resection. Median survival after liver resection for MGC is up to 34 months, with a five year survival rate of 24.5%. Similarly, reported median survival after pulmonary resection of MGC is 21 months with long term survival of greater than 5 years a possibility. Several case reports and small studies have documented evidence of long-term survival in select individuals who undergo CHPP for MGC. Design The GYMSSA trial is a prospective randomized trial for patients with MGC. It is designed to compare two therapeutic approaches: gastrectomy with metastasectomy plus systemic chemotherapy (GYMS) versus systemic chemotherapy alone (SA). Systemic therapy will be composed of the FOLFOXIRI regimen. The aim of the study is to evaluate overall survival and potential selection criteria to determine those patients who may benefit from surgery plus systemic therapy. The study will be conducted by the Surgery Branch at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland. Surgeries and followup will be done at the NCI, and chemotherapy will be given by either the local oncologist or the medical oncology branch at NCI. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID. NCT00941655

Ondansetron represents a new class of drugs that exert their antiemetic activity by selective inhibition of a serotonin receptor subtype (5-HT3). Ondansetron has marked activity against emesis associated with cisplatin and other highly emetogenic drugs. Compared with high doses of metoclopramide, the antiemetic “gold standard.” it demonstrates equal or superior efficacy. Although ondansetron is moderately well absorbed after oral administration, only a parenteral formulation will initially be available. Ondansetron is eliminated almost entirely by hepatic metabolism: less than five percent of an intravenously administered dose is recovered intact in urine. The half-life of ondansetron is approximately 3.5 hours: slightly shorter in children and prolonged in the elderly. Neither clinical efficacy nor adverse effects have correlated with serum concentrations. Ondansetron is generally well tolerated. Clinically relevant adverse effects include headache, diarrhea or constipation, sedation, and transient minor elevations of liver function tests. It is not associated with extrapyramidal reactions. Ondansetron is indicated as prophylaxis for nausea and vomiting associated with emetogenic chemotherapy. Studies to further evaluate and define its use are ongoing.

Renal cell cancer (RCC) is a relatively uncommon malignancy, with 51,190 cases expected to be diagnosed in 2007. Localized disease is curable by surgery; however, locally advanced or metastatic disease is not curable in most cases and, until recently, had a limited response to drug treatment. Historically, biologic response modifiers or immunomodulating agents were tested in clinical trials based on observations that some cases of RCC can spontaneously regress. High-dose aldesleukin is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as a treatment for advanced RCC; however, the drug is associated with a high frequency of severe adverse effects. Responses have been observed with low-dose aldesleukin and interferon alfa, but with little effect on overall survival. Sorafenib and sunitinib are novel therapies that target growth factor receptors known to be activated by the hypoxia-inducible factor and the Ras-Raf/MEK/ERK pathways. These pathways are important in the pathophysiology of RCC. Sorafenib and sunitinib have shown antitumor activity as first- and second-line therapy in patients with cytokine-refractory metastatic RCC who have clear-cell histology. Although complete responses are not common, both drugs promote disease stabilization and increase progression-free survival. This information suggests that disease stabilization may be an important determinant for response in RCC and possibly other cancers. Sorafenib and sunitinib are generally well tolerated and are considered first- and second-line treatment options for patients with advanced clear cell RCC. In addition, sorafenib and sunitinib have shown promising results in initial clinical trials evaluating antitumor activity in patients who are refractory to other antiangiogenic therapy. The most common toxicities with both sorafenib and sunitinib are hand-foot syndrome, rash, fatigue, hypertension, and diarrhea. Research is directed toward defining the optimal use of these new agents.

Representatives from several countries preseno "Global Advances" during the opening session for ISOPP IV. The speakers summarized major phar macy-related accomplishments during the last 2 years. Each speaker shared his or her own unique perspective of oncology pharmacy practice with the ISOPP attendees and gave some insight into particular geographical pharmacy concerns.

PURPOSE: PSC 833 (valspodar) is a second-generation P-glycoprotein (Pgp) antagonist developed to reverse multidrug resistance. We conducted a phase I study of a 7-day oral administration of PSC 833 in combination with paclitaxel, administered as a 96-hour continuous infusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with advanced cancer were enrolled onto the trial. PSC 833 was administered orally for 7 days, beginning 72 hours before the start of the paclitaxel infusion. Paclitaxel dose reductions were planned because of the pharmacokinetic interactions known to occur with PSC 833. RESULTS: In combination with PSC 833, maximum-tolerated doses were defined as paclitaxel 13.1 mg/m2/d continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) for 4 days without filgrastim, and paclitaxel 17.5 mg/m2/d CIVI for 4 days with filgrastim support. Dose-limiting toxicity for the combination was neutropenia. Statistical analysis of cohorts revealed similar mean steady-state concentrations (Cpss) and areas under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUCs) when patients received paclitaxel doses of 13.1 or 17.5 mg/m2/d for 4 days with PSC 833, as when they received a paclitaxel dose of 35 mg/m2/d for 4 days without PSC 833. However, the effect of PSC 833 on paclitaxel pharmacokinetics varied greatly among individual patients, although a surrogate assay using CD56+ cells suggested inhibition of Pgp was complete or nearly complete at low concentrations of PSC 833. Responses occurred in three of four patients with non–small-cell lung cancer, and clinical benefit occurred in five of 10 patients with ovarian carcinoma. CONCLUSION: PSC 833 in combination with paclitaxel can be administered safely to patients provided the paclitaxel dose is reduced to compensate for the pharmacokinetic interaction. Surrogate studies with CD56+ cells indicate that the maximum-tolerated dose for PSC 833 gives serum levels much higher than those required to block Pgp. The variability in paclitaxel pharmacokinetics, despite complete inhibition of Pgp in the surrogate assay, suggests that other mechanisms, most likely related to P450, contribute to the pharmacokinetic interaction. Future development of combinations such as this should include strategies to predict pharmacokinetics of the chemotherapeutic agent. This in turn will facilitate dosing to achieve comparable CPss and AUCs.

A comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach for reducing the number of chemotherapy-related medication errors at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, where approximately 8500 doses of chemotherapy agents are dispensed annually, is described. Heightened awareness of the seriousness of chemotherapy-related medication errors prompted formation of an interdisciplinary task force in June 1995 to analyze and improve the hospital's system for ordering, checking, processing, and administering cancer chemotherapy agents. Problems were analyzed and rectified in accordance with the hospital's plan-do-check-act performance-improvement model. Performance monitors for the improvements included a system to record and categorize all chemotherapy-related prescribing errors and a hospital-wide occurrence-reporting system. The task force identified seven major categories in which improvements were needed: protocol development, computer-system enhancements, dose verification, information access, education for health care practitioners, error follow-up, and infusion pumps. Despite the Clinical Center's good safety-net system, 23 modifications were made to the existing system through December 1999. These changes resulted in an overall 23% decrease in prescribing errors and a 53% decrease in serious prescribing errors. The task force membership was recently broadened to include representatives of additional departments where chemotherapy agents are used, and this group recommended more than 20 additional system changes. The changes are being implemented, and their effect on reducing the number of chemotherapy-related errors will be measured. The continuous-improvement process used prospectively by the task force helps ensure that safe chemotherapy practices are instituted uniformly throughout the hospital.

PURPOSE To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities of paclitaxel with concurrent thoracic irradiation in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a 120-hour continuous infusion regimen. A secondary objective was to assess the effect of paclitaxel on the cell cycle through serial tumor biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Paclitaxel was administered as a 120-hour (5-day) continuous infusion repeated every 3 weeks during the course of radiation therapy. The starting dose of paclitaxel was 90 mg/m2. Doses were escalated at 15-mg/m2 increments in successive cohorts of three patients. In NSCLC patients, radiation was delivered to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes for a total tumor dose of 6,120 cGy. In mesothelioma patients, hemithoracic irradiation was delivered as the initial treatment field with a conedown to the tumor volume for a total dose of 5,760 to 6,300 cGy. Tumor biopsies were obtained, if possible, before and during paclitaxel treatment. RESULTS Thirty patients were entered onto this study through three dose levels (from 90 mg/m2 to 120 mg/m2). The MTD was determined to be 105 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia (two patients). Grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (nausea and vomiting) was also observed at 120 mg/m2. Three of 30 patients developed a hypersensitivity reaction. Six patients had grade 2 lung injury manifested by a persistent cough that required antitussives. Five patients underwent tumor biopsies. None of the patients showed a significant block of cells in mitosis (G2/M) after paclitaxel infusion. CONCLUSION The MTD of paclitaxel, when administered as a 120-hour continuous infusion with concurrent radiotherapy, was determined to be 105 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Continuous infusion paclitaxel administered with large field irradiation of the lung is well tolerated and deserves continued evaluation.

We thank Dr. Kolesar and Mr. Vermeulen for their observation about potential differences in determining the stability of biological compounds versus simple chemical molecules. We agree that guidelines should be developed for conducting stability studies for biological agents that include a

PURPOSE To assess the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel administered as a 96-hour infusion to patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had relapsed NHL and measurable disease and were considered incurable. Paclitaxel was infused at a dose of 140 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Premedications to prevent paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions were not administered and no patients received corticosteroids. Expression of the multidrug resistance (mdr-1) gene was determined in tumor from 17 patients by mRNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS Thirty-one patients received a total of 99 cycles of paclitaxel. Two patients were not assessable for response. The median age was 50 years, 71% had stage IV disease, and intermediate/high-grade histology was present in 65% of patients. Patients had received a median of three prior chemotherapy regimens, and 68% of patients had responded to the previous chemotherapy (chemotherapy-sensitive). Of 29 assessable patients, five (17%) achieved a partial response (PR). With a median potential follow-up time of 17 months, the median event-free and overall survival durations were 1.6 and 7.5 months, respectively. No correlation was found between response to paclitaxel and extent of prior treatment or response. The mdr-1 gene was easily detectable in 14 of 17 tumor biopsies, but was low in all but one sample. The most serious toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which occurred during 14% of cycles. CONCLUSION Paclitaxel was well tolerated, but had a low response rate in patients with relapsed NHLs. There was no clear association between response to paclitaxel and extent of our response to prior treatment. Most patients had chemotherapy-sensitive disease, which suggests that the low response rate to paclitaxel was probably not due to general chemotherapy resistance. Paclitaxel provided good palliation in a minority of patients and is a reasonable agent to consider for use in patients who have failed to respond to standard chemotherapy.

Summary Background It has been demonstrated that granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) can ameliorate chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. The extent to which GM-CSF can increase the actual delivered dose intensity of combination chemotherapy over multiple cycles of therapy to patients with advanced breast cancer has not been well defined. We conducted a phase I/II study of dose-intensive FLAC chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) in combination with GM-CSF in patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer to study the acute and cumulative toxicities, anti-tumor activity and dose-intensity achievable with this regimen. Methods Eighty-one patients with newly diagnosed stages LTB, in and IV breast cancer who were previously untreated with chemotherapy and who had measurable disease received multiple cycles of FLAC chemotherapy plus E. coli-derived GM-CSF administered every three weeks. Results FLAC plus GM-CSF as associated with significant cumulative hematologic toxicity. Ninety-eight percent of patients developed grade 4 neutropenia; 29% of all cycles administered required hospitalization for fever and neutropenia; 41% and 22% of cycles required red blood cell and platelet transfusions, respectively. Other significant toxicities with E. coli-derived GM-CSF included mild to moderate first dose effects (hypotension, dyspnea, abdominal cramping) in 30% of patients; late occurring anaphylactoid reactions in 11% of patients; and vascular thromboses. The average delivered dose intensities over all cycles were cyclophosphamide, 210 mg/m2/week; doxorubicin, 14.8 mg/m2/week and 5-fluorouracil, 342 mg/m2/week. The overall clinical response rates were 100% and 83% for LABC and metastatic patients, respectively. There were 23% (6/26) pathologic CR’s in the LABC patients given neoadjuvant FLAC and 22% (12/54) clinical CR’s in the stage IV patients. The median survival of the LABC patients has not been reached (>26 months) and is 30 months for the stage IV patients. Colusions The administration of multiple cycles of FLAC plus E. coli-derived GM-CSF therapy is associated with cumulative, dose-limiting myelosuppression, especially thrombocytopenia, as well as significant clinical toxicity. A modest increase in FLAC dose intensity over the starting doses was achievable with the addition of GM-CSF. FLAC chemotherapy has substantial antitumor activity in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. The potential usefulness of FLAC plus GM-CSF must be balanced by its considerable cost and alteration in patients’ quality of life due to toxicity. Combination hematopoietic growth factor strategies may be able to reduce the toxicity of FLAC and to allow further increase dose intensity.

PURPOSE A phase I study of paclitaxel infused over 96-hours was performed to determine toxicity, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics in patients with incurable lymphomas and solid tumors. A phase II study was performed at the MTD of paclitaxel in patients with doxorubicin/mitoxantrone-refractory metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the phase I study, paclitaxel dose levels ranged from 120 to 160 mg/m2, administered on a 21-day cycle. Patients with metastatic breast cancer who had either no response or a partial response (PR) to doxorubicin or mitoxantrone and had measurable disease were eligible for the phase I and II studies. Expression of the multidrug resistance (mdr-1) gene was determined in tumor biopsies by mRNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS Twelve patients received a total of 73 cycles of paclitaxel on the phase I study. Dose-limiting mucositis and/or grade IV granulocytopenia was reached at 160 mg/m2, and 140 mg/m2 was selected as the phase II dose. Thirty-six consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated, of whom three were not assessable. The median age was 49 years, with disease in the liver and/or lung in 76%. Patients received a median of two prior regimens for metastatic disease, and 73% had no response to prior doxorubicin or mitoxantrone. Of 33 patients treated with paclitaxel, 16 patients (48%) achieved a PR and five (15%) achieved a minor response (MR). With a median potential follow-up duration of 60 weeks, the median progression-free and overall survival durations were 27 and 43 weeks, respectively. No correlation was found between extent of prior treatment or prior response to doxorubicin/mitoxantrone, and response to paclitaxel. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics showed a correlation between both granulocyte and mucosal toxicity, and serum steady-state concentrations (Css) more than 0.07 mumol/L. Patients with liver metastases had significantly decreased paclitaxel clearance and higher paclitaxel Css. Levels of mdr-1 were uniformly low in all tumor biopsies studied. CONCLUSION The recommended phase II dose of paclitaxel is 140 mg/m2 in patients without liver metastases and 105 mg/m2 in patients with liver metastases. Ninety-six-hour infusions of paclitaxel were effective and well tolerated in patients with doxorubicin/mitoxantrone-refractory breast cancer. Prolonged infusion schedules may be more effective than shorter schedules and deserve further study.

In conclusion, paclitaxel, a very active anticancer agent, is dissolved in a polyoxyethylated castor oil/alcohol vehicle, which poses some interesting challenges for drug preparation and administration. Physicians, nurses, and pharmacists should become knowledgeable about solution containers, intravenous administration sets, in-line filters, and access devices compatible with paclitaxel administration. Chemical stability studies show that paclitaxel diluted to clinically used concentrations in customary infusion fluids is stable for at least 27 hours at room temperature, which enables a 24-hour supply to be prepared in a single container. Paclitaxel has been demonstrated to be visually and turbidimetrically compatible with many other drugs during Y-site simulation studies; however, evidence of chemical compatibility for the majority of these combinations is lacking.

BACKGROUND Neovascularization induced by basic fibroblast growth factor (basic FGF) or FGF-like cytokines is thought to play a substantial role in the pathogenesis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated Kaposi's sarcoma. Pentosan polysulfate has been shown to inhibit basic FGF and FGF-like dependent tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, it has been found to inhibit the growth of Kaposi's sarcoma-derived spindle cells in vitro. These observations suggested that pentosan polysulfate might be worth exploring as a potential agent for the treatment of Kaposi's sarcoma. PURPOSE The purpose of this phase 1 clinical trial was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of pentosan polysulfate in patients with HIV-associated Kaposi's sarcoma and whether or not this compound had activity against this neoplasm. METHODS Sixteen HIV-seropositive patients with Kaposi's sarcoma received pentosan polysulfate via continuous venous infusion for 3-6 weeks and then received a subcutaneous dose three times per week. Three different doses of pentosan polysulfate were administered: 2 mg/kg per day by infusion followed by 2 mg/kg per dose given subcutaneously (six patients), 3 mg/kg per day by infusion followed by 3 mg/kg per dose given subcutaneously (five patients), and 4 mg/kg per day by infusion followed by 4 mg/kg per dose given subcutaneously (five patients). Five of the 16 patients in the study also received injections of 1 mg of pentosan polysulfate into two different lesions two times a week for 3 weeks, followed by intralesional therapy once weekly. After receiving pentosan polysulfate for 6 weeks, patients were administered 100 mg zidovudine (AZT) orally every 4 hours in conjunction with pentosan polysulfate. RESULTS The maximally tolerated dose of pentosan polysulfate given by continuous venous infusion was found to be 3 mg/kg per day. No patient had an objective clinical antitumor response to either systemic or intralesional pentosan polysulfate administration; however, three patients had stable Kaposi's sarcoma for 3-27 weeks. No statistically significant effect on CD4 cells or serum HIV p24 antigen was noted during pentosan polysulfate administration. Dose-limiting toxic effects were characterized by anticoagulation and thrombocytopenia and were reversible. CONCLUSION Pentosan polysulfate was well tolerated in this patient population. However, no objective tumor response or evidence of anti-HIV activity was noted; therefore, no claim of activity can be made in this trial. IMPLICATION Continued investigation into the use of angiogenesis inhibitors with improved activity and toxicity profiles or different mechanisms of action is warranted.

PURPOSE High-dose chemotherapy produces durable disease-free remissions in a minority of patients with resistant lymphomas and solid tumors. In an attempt to improve on the available regimens, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) were selected for a new high-dose regimen because of their favorable spectrum of nonhematopoietic toxicity and evidence of synergy in in vitro systems. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-one patients with drug-resistant Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, and breast and testicular cancers were entered onto a phase I and II trial of a single course of ICE with autologous bone marrow rescue. Before transplantation, all patients received combination chemotherapy until maximal tumor response was achieved. RESULTS Patients received total doses of ifosfamide from 10 to 18 g/m2, carboplatin from 0.9 to 1.98 g/m2, and etoposide from 0.6 to 1.5 g/m2 administered during a 4-day period, with a maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of ifosfamide 16 g/m2, carboplatin 1.8 g/m2, and etoposide 1.5 g/m2. The dose-limiting toxicities included irreversible renal, cardiac, and CNS dysfunction. There were three toxic deaths (7%), and all occurred above the MTD. Thirteen patients who were treated at the MTD tolerated the regimen well; reversible renal dysfunction and grade 2 mucositis commonly were observed. Of 23 heavily pretreated patients with persistent disease at the time of transplant, 10 (43%) achieved complete remissions (CRs) and 11 (48%) achieved partial remissions (PRs). Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients who were treated at or below the MTD had a median potential follow-up of 11.9 months, and 12-month progression-free survivals of 62% and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSION High-dose ICE with bone marrow rescue was well tolerated with a high response rate, and should be considered for further testing.