Search

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of lesinurad, a selective uric acid uptake inhibitor, alone and in combination with the xanthine oxidase inhibitor allopurinol, on serum uric acid and urinary urate excretion in patients with gout and hyperuricemia. A phase 1b, multicenter, open‐label, multiple‐dose study was carried out in patients with gout with serum uric acid ≥8 mg/dL following washout of urate‐lowering therapy. Patients were treated with allopurinol 300 mg/day alone in week 1; lesinurad 400 or 600 mg/day was added in week 2, followed by lesinurad 400 or 600 mg/day alone in week 3. Serum uric acid and urine uric acid were evaluated each week. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Lesinurad 400 or 600 mg/day added to allopurinol 300 mg/day reduced serum uric acid by 60% and 72%, respectively, versus allopurinol alone (37%) or lesinurad 400 mg/day (44%) or 600 mg/day (47%) alone. A 100% response rate of serum uric acid

Introduction Fosaprepitant, an intravenous (IV) aprepitant prodrug for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, is associated with systemic and infusion-site reactions attributed in part to its surfactant, polysorbate 80. HTX-019 is an IV aprepitant formulation free of polysorbate 80 and other synthetic surfactants. Materials and methods This open-label, single-dose, randomized, two-way crossover bioequivalence study compared pharmacokinetics and safety of HTX-019 and fosaprepitant. Healthy subjects received single-dose HTX-019 (130 mg) or fosaprepitant (150 mg) IV over 30 min, with ≥7-day washout between doses. Blood samples were evaluated for pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence; safety evaluation included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events. Ninety-seven of one hundred enrolled subjects completed the study. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment sequences. For HTX-019, mean (percent coefficient of variation) area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to time of last measurable plasma concentration (AUC0−t), AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC0−inf), and plasma concentration at 12 h (C12 h) for HTX-019 were 43,729 h*ng/mL (32.7), 45,460 h*ng/mL (36.8), and 988.4 ng/mL (27.5), respectively; corresponding fosaprepitant values were 44,130 h*ng/mL (32.0), 46,163 h*ng/mL (36.6), and 1,022 ng/mL (28.5). Also, 90% CIs (94.186–101.354) were within bioequivalence bounds (80%–125%). Within 1 h following infusion start, one (1%) HTX-019 recipient reported one TEAE, while 20 (20%) fosaprepitant recipients reported 32 TEAEs. Dyspnea occurred in three fosaprepitant recipients (at, Video abstract

Aim: HTX-019 (CINVANTI® [aprepitant injectable emulsion]) is a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist approved for preventing acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). HTX-019 is free of polysorbate 80 and other synthetic surfactants and showed bioequivalence to and a more favorable safety profile than fosaprepitant when administered as a 30-min infusion in healthy subjects. The shortage of small-volume parenteral solutions led to a recommendation to administer HTX-019 by intravenous push. The objectives were to evaluate pharmacokinetics, tolerability and safety following HTX-019 administration by injection versus infusion. Materials & methods: Study comprised Part A, a pilot Phase I, single-center, randomized, pharmacokinetic, safety and tolerability, open-label study, followed by Part B, a two-sequence crossover study of HTX-019 130 mg in healthy adults, via injection and infusion. Blood samples were evaluated for aprepitant pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence. Safety evaluations included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, clinical laboratory testing and electrocardiograms. Results: In Part A, 24 subjects were randomly assigned to three cohorts (n = 8 per cohort) and received HTX-019 130 mg, administered intravenously over 15 min (cohort 1), 5 min (cohort 2) or 2 min (cohort 3). Progression to Part B occurred after acceptable tolerability was established in cohorts 2 and 3. In Part B, 50 randomized subjects received a 2-min injection (9 ml/min) and 30-min infusion (296 ml/h) of HTX-019 130 mg. Bioequivalence was demonstrated for HTX-019 injection and infusion. Both administration methods via a peripheral line were well tolerated; eight subjects experienced 11 TEAEs (six related) following injection and nine experienced 14 TEAEs (nine related) following infusion. Headache and fatigue were the most prevalent treatment-related TEAEs; one subject per group experienced feeling hot ≤30 min after drug administration. Conclusion: Pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles of 2-min HTX-019 injection support this potential alternative administration method for CINV prevention.

Aim: Evaluate safety of HTX-019, a novel polysorbate 80– and synthetic surfactant-free intravenous formulation of neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist aprepitant for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Methods: Two open-label, randomized, two-way crossover studies evaluated treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in 200 healthy subjects. Subjects received HTX-019 130 mg (30-min infusion) and fosaprepitant 150 mg (20- or 30-min infusion), with ≥7-day washout between doses. Results: Less than or equal to 30 min after start of infusion, TEAEs occurred in 5 (3%) HTX-019 and 30 (15%) fosaprepitant recipients. No HTX-019 recipients had infusion-site adverse events, versus 15 (8%) fosaprepitant recipients. Treatment-related dyspnea occurred in one HTX-019 and six fosaprepitant recipients. No severe/serious TEAEs occurred; all TEAEs resolved. Conclusion: HTX-019 may provide a safer aprepitant formulation than fosaprepitant for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prevention.

Zancong Shen, Colin Rowlings, Brad Kerr, Vijay Hingorani, Kimberly Manhard, Barry Quart, Li-Tain Yeh, Chris Storgard Ardea Biosciences, Inc. (a member of the AstraZeneca group), San Diego, CA, USA Abstract: Lesinurad is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor under investigation for the treatment of gout. Single and multiple ascending dose studies were conducted to evaluate pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of lesinurad in healthy males. Lesinurad was administered as an oral solution between 5 mg and 600 mg (single ascending dose; N=34) and as an oral solution or immediate-release capsules once daily (qday) between 100 mg and 400 mg for 10 days under fasted or fed condition (multiple ascending dose; N=32). Following single doses of lesinurad solution, absorption was rapid and exposure (maximum observed plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration–time curve) increased in a dose-proportional manner. Following multiple qday doses, there was no apparent accumulation of lesinurad. Urinary excretion of unchanged lesinurad was generally between 30% and 40% of dose. Increases in urinary excretion of uric acid and reductions in serum uric acid correlated with dose. Following 400 mg qday dosing, serum uric acid reduction was 35% at 24 hours post-dose, supporting qday dosing. Arelative bioavailability study in healthy males (N=8) indicated a nearly identical pharmacokinetic profile following dosing of tablets or capsules. Lesinurad was generally safe and well tolerated. Keywords: urinary excretion, urate lowering, URAT1, single and multiple doses, food effect, clearance&nbsp

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacodynamics (PDs), pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of lesinurad (selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor) in combination with febuxostat (xanthine oxidase inhibitor) in patients with gout. Methods. This study was a phase IB, multicentre, open-label, multiple-dose study of gout patients with serum uric acid (sUA) >8 mg/dl following washout of urate-lowering therapy with colchicine flare prophylaxis. Febuxostat 40 or 80 mg/day was administered on days 121, lesinurad 400 mg/day was added on days 814 and then lesinurad was increased to 600 mg/day on days 1521. sUA, urine uric acid and PK profiles were evaluated at the end of each week. Safety was assessed by adverse events, laboratory tests and physical examinations. Results. Initial treatment with febuxostat 40 or 80 mg/day monotherapy resulted in 67% and 56% of subjects, respectively, achieving a sUA level

Background Excess body burden of uric acid promotes gout. Diminished renal clearance of uric acid causes hyperuricemia in most patients with gout, and the renal urate transporter (URAT)1 is important for regulation of serum uric acid (sUA) levels. The URAT1 inhibitors probenecid and benzbromarone are used as gout therapies; however, their use is limited by drug–drug interactions and off-target toxicity, respectively. Here, we define the mechanism of action of lesinurad (Zurampic®; RDEA594), a novel URAT1 inhibitor, recently approved in the USA and Europe for treatment of chronic gout. Methods sUA levels, fractional excretion of uric acid (FEUA), lesinurad plasma levels, and urinary excretion of lesinurad were measured in healthy volunteers treated with lesinurad. In addition, lesinurad, probenecid, and benzbromarone were compared in vitro for effects on urate transporters and the organic anion transporters (OAT)1 and OAT3, changes in mitochondrial membrane potential, and human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) activity. Results After 6 hours, a single 200-mg dose of lesinurad elevated FEUA 3.6-fold (p

The RAS-RAF-mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK)-ERK pathway provides numerous opportunities for targeted oncology therapeutics. In particular, the MEK enzyme is attractive due to high selectivity for its target ERK and the central role that activated ERK plays in driving cell proliferation. The structural, pharmacologic, and pharmacokinetic properties of RDEA119/BAY 869766, an allosteric MEK inhibitor, are presented. RDEA119/BAY 869766 is selectively bound directly to an allosteric pocket in the MEK1/2 enzymes. This compound is highly efficacious at inhibiting cell proliferation in several tumor cell lines in vitro. In vivo, RDEA119/BAY 869766 exhibits potent activity in xenograft models of melanoma, colon, and epidermal carcinoma. RDEA119/BAY 869766 exhibits complete suppression of ERK phosphorylation at fully efficacious doses in mice. RDEA119/BAY 869766 shows a tissue selectivity that reduces its potential for central nervous system–related side effects. Using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, we show that maintaining adequate MEK inhibition throughout the dosing interval is likely more important than achieving high peak levels because greater efficacy was achieved with more frequent but lower dosing. Based on its longer half-life in humans than in mice, RDEA119/BAY 869766 has the potential for use as a once- or twice-daily oral treatment for cancer. RDEA119/BAY 869766, an exquisitely selective, orally available MEK inhibitor, has been selected for clinical development because of its potency and favorable pharmacokinetic profile. [Cancer Res 2009;69(17):6839–47]

Statistical methods developed for survival analysis (time to event) were applied to treatments which are potent viral load suppressers in HIV-infected subjects. The methodology was applied to HIV-RNA levels obtained from the clinical study AG1343-511 (nelfinavir [NFV] in combination with zidovudine +lamivudine). Utilizing stringent treatment response definitions based on the limit of quantification (LOQ) of two assays, the analyses established that nelfinavir containing arms were significantly better than the control arm and the 750 mg NFV arm was superior to the 500 mg NFV arm. Analyses of durability (duration) of response revealed that subjects qualified as responders to more sensitive (lower LOQ) assay were associated with longer duration of response. The statistical methodology utilized and the parameters defined in this article can be applied to the evaluation of anti-HIV treatments in general. For potent anti-HIV treatments, the method can be utilized with the definitions developed here; less potent treatments can be analyzed with proper modifications in definitions of response and relapse.

Background: Current potent antiretroviral therapy (using a protease inhibitor and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors) produces a durable suppression of HIV replication in less than 75% of treated patients. Identification of predictors of successful therapy might allow the development of improved strategies to increase response rates. Methods: We analyzed retrospectively the results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind Phase III study of combination anti-HIV therapy with nelfinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine to evaluate the relationship between virological response over 48 weeks of treatment to variables which could potentially serve as early predictors of long-term response. The goal was to produce long-term suppression of viral load to sensitive (< 400 copies HIV RNA/ml) and ultrasensitive (< 50 copies HIV RNA/ml) limits of quantification with the Amplicor PCR assay. Findings: Baseline viral load, the change in viral load over the first 4 weeks of treatment, the 2 h post-dose nelfinavir levels and the time to respond to HIV RNA levels of < 400 copies/ml and < 50 copies/ml have the best predictive value in determining response and response duration. Patients who achieved very low viral nadirs (< 50 copies HIV RNA/ml) had significantly longer responses than those who achieved nadirs of 50-400 copies HIV RNA/ml. Interpretation: Parameters that can be measured easily at baseline or early after therapy is started can identify patients at high risk of failure with standard treatment. Such patients may be candidates for more aggressive therapy or for alternative strategies designed to improve outcome. In addition, these results support the use of ultra-sensitive HIV RNA assays to predict long-term outcome of anti-HIV therapy.

RDEA806 is a novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) with potent in vitro activity against wild-type and NNRTI-resistant HIV-1. A phase 2a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating study evaluated the short-term antiviral activity, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of RDEA806 monotherapy in antiretroviral-naïve, HIV-1-infected subjects. The subjects were randomized to four cohorts comprising four dosage regimens and two formulations of RDEA806 or placebo in a 3:1 ratio within each cohort. The investigators were blinded to the results for each cohort. The subjects received RDEA806 or placebo for 7 days. The primary end point was the change in the HIV RNA load from the baseline to day 9 for each of the four RDEA806 dose regimens compared to that achieved with placebo. The RDEA806 PKs and the immune response to RDEA806 were evaluated along with the safety and tolerability of each dose. Of a total of 48 enrolled subjects, 36 subjects (9 in each cohort) were randomized to RDEA806 study drug, and 12 (3 in each cohort) took placebo. A statistically significant decrease in the viral load from the baseline to day 9 was observed for all RDEA806 treatment groups ( P < 0.001). On day 9, the mean changes in the HIV RNA load from that at the baseline were −1.95 log 10 copies/ml (400 mg twice a day), −1.39 log 10 copies/ml (600 mg once a day [q.d.]), −1.62 log 10 copies/ml (800 mg q.d.), and −1.70 log 10 copies/ml (1,000 mg q.d.). The pharmacokinetics were linear and dose proportional. Treatment with RDEA806 was well tolerated, and there were no discontinuations due to adverse events. In conclusion, all doses of RDEA806 were safe and well tolerated and exhibited robust antiretroviral activity in this short-term monotherapy study with antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected subjects. RDEA806 is a potent and promising novel NNRTI.

The effect of encainide administration on steady-state plasma digoxin levels was evaluated in 17 patients receiving stable doses of digoxin. A paired t test, comparing plasma digoxin levels (mean +/- standard error) before encainide therapy (1.05 +/- 0.14 ng/ml) and after 2 weeks of encainide, 100 mg/day (1.03 +/- 0.11 ng/ml) or 200 mg/day (1.2 +/- 0.2 ng/ml), indicates no significant (p greater than 0.05) change in digoxin levels. These results were confirmed in a second study of 10 patients with severe congestive heart failure. Also, no difference in efficacy of either drug was observed and changes in dosing of digoxin were not required. Plasma concentrations of encainide and its 2 major metabolites, O-demethyl encainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-O-demethyl encainide, significantly increased by 31.6%, 43.1% and 35.6% after concomitant cimetidine administration in 13 healthy adult men receiving 75 mg/day of encainide. However, a retrospective evaluation of 33 patients receiving both drugs did not reveal any clinically significant interactions. Retrospective evaluation of patients enrolled in clinical studies who received concomitant digoxin (268), antiarrhythmics (118), anticoagulants (78), antidiabetics (40), antipsychotics (23), beta blockers (88), calcium-channel blockers (24) or diuretics (229) did not reveal any clinically significant interactions with encainide. Similarly, in vitro protein binding studies did not reveal any clinically significant interactions with encainide or its major metabolites. Six patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance 10 to 38 ml/min) received 25 mg of encainide, 3 times/day, for 7 doses. Plasma encainide, ODE and 3-methoxy-O-demethyl concentrations were similar to those observed in normal subjects who had received twice the dose of encainide, and steady-state apparent oral clearance of encainide was reduced by 66% with renal impairment. Based on these data it is recommended that in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment encainide be initiated at one-third the normal dose, or 25 mg once a day. Doses may be elevated in small increments at 1-week intervals if needed for efficacy. The effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of encainide was studied in 7 patients with clinically documented cirrhosis. Compared with normal subjects studied using a similar protocol, the plasma concentrations of encainide were elevated significantly due to a 6-fold decrease in oral clearance. However, since plasma concentrations of the active metabolite ODE were correspondingly lower, specific encainide dosing instructions for patients with hepatic impairment are not indicated.

Encainide is a potent new antiarrhythmic agent with 2 major active metabolites and 2 distinct phenotypes for metabolism, extensive (approximately 92%) and nonextensive (8%). Encainide is an active compound with close correlation of plasma levels with antiarrhythmic effectiveness and electrocardiographic changes in nonextensive metabolizers. Its metabolites, O-demethyl-encainide and 3-methoxy-O-demethyl-encainide, are active against experimental and clinical arrhythmias. They have longer half-lives than and equal or greater potency than the parent compound. All 3 compounds contribute to the antiarrhythmic profile in extensive metabolizers. There is no readily apparent relation between encainide and its metabolites, blood levels and efficacy because of the complexity of the 3 active compounds and individual variation in pharmacokinetic and arrhythmia responsiveness. Encainide has been given for up to 2 years in 140 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. The survival curves are similar to historical control data from patients reported by Graboys and Swerdlow. The survival curves for long-term administration in patients with frequent ventricular premature complexes (greater than 30/min) are comparable to data from Califf. While these data must be viewed cautiously, it seems fair to conclude that encainide is as effective as any combination of drugs for preventing sudden death in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.