Search

Background:DHX37 is an autosomal gene responsible for encoding a helicase from the DExD/H-box family that plays an essential role in ribosome biogenesis. Variants in this gene were previously reported in two different phenotypes: neurodevelopmental disorders and disorders/differences of sex development (DSD). Particularly for the DSD group, variants were mainly reported associated with gonadal dysgenesis and testicular regression syndrome. Summary: Focusing specifically in the DSD group, we revised the 21 DHX37 variants described across a total of 55 cases published in the literature so far. We summarized the most important clinical and molecular features of all cases, trying to have a better comprehensiveness about this gene in the sexual development. Key Messages: The trick question regarding DHX37 is how a helicase involved in basic cell function could have a specific role in testis development. Little is known about the impact of DHX37 variants in DSD individuals. Nevertheless, current research strongly suggests that DHX37 is involved in the male sex development pathway, particularly in testis determination and maintenance. This is evidenced by the predominant assignment of affected individuals as males and the presence of Wolffian structures in most of the cases. Advancements in molecular techniques, such as the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells and the digenic inheritance for DHX37 cases, are also addressed in this paper. This represents the first comprehensive review of all DHX37 variants published in the literature to date. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and Objective: Prenatal suspicion of disorders/differences of sex development (DSDs) is a relatively new phenomenon. The aim of this study was to review the prenatal findings of DSD cases postnatally diagnosed in our tertiary referral center. Methods: We evaluated 57 DSD cases with sex ambiguity who had undergone prenatal ultrasound with phenotypic sex assessment and/or cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) for genotypic sex assessment. Results: Prenatal cffDNA had been performed in 32 cases, being positive (suggestive of male genotypic sex) in 26 and negative (suggestive of female genotypic sex) in 6. Five with cffDNA negative had a prenatal ultrasound indicating female external genitalia, in turn, in those with cffDNA positive, only two had a prenatal ultrasound indicating male external genitalia. Our postnatal data showed that when external genitalia were female or poorly virilized, prenatal ultrasound indicated female sex, but in cases of higher degree of virilization, ultrasound showed similar rates of male, female, or undetermined sex. Regarding the karyotype, our data showed those with XY karyotype had positive cffDNA, those with XX karyotype had negative cffDNA, and all five with sex chromosome anomalies had positive cffDNA because they were 45,X/46,XY. We suggested an algorithm to investigate these cases during gestation, including evaluation of uterus, fetal growth, and malformations. Conclusion: We suggest that the parents should be counseled prenatally by a dedicated multidisciplinary team with experience in DSD management and evaluated as soon as possible after birth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Ovotesticular disorder of sex development (OT-DSD) is a rare condition defined by concomitance of testicular tissue and ovarian tissue (containing follicles) in the same individual. In SRY-negative 46,XX OT-DSD, the presence of testicular tissue may be due to variations in NR5A1. Our aims were to search for NR5A1 variants in SRY-negative 46,XX OT-DSD patients and to perform a systematic review on the contribution of NR5A1 variations to 46,XX OT-DSD. Methods: Sanger sequencing of NR5A1 was performed in seven SRY-negative 46,XX OT-DSD patients: five simplex cases and two with another sibling with a 46,XX DSD. Systematic review of original studies on NR5A1 sequencing of 46,XX OT-DSD patients was performed according to PRISMA-P guideline. Case reports were selected for analysis of clinical features. Individuals with NR5A1-associated testicular DSD were not included. Results: Sanger sequencing of NR5A1 did not reveal pathogenic variants among our patients. Our cohort was included in this systematic review with seven other articles, totalizing fifty-six 46,XX OT-DSD patients investigated by Sanger or whole-exome sequencing. From them, three NR5A1 pathogenic variants were identified (5% of the cases). Clinical analysis of these 3 cases and 5 case reports revealed: predominance of ovotestis (13/16 gonads) and bilateral OT-DSD (5/8 cases). Conclusion: The etiology of most 46,XX OT-DSD cases remains elusive, highlighting the importance of a deeper molecular investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ovotesticular disorders of sex development (OT‐DSD) are characterized by ovarian follicles and seminiferous tubules in the same individual, with a wide range of atypical genitalia. We report on two sibs with atypical genitalia and SRY‐negative 46,XX DSD, OT‐DSD was confirmed only in the boy, while the girl had bilateral ovaries. Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) showed a 737‐kb duplication at Xq27.1 including the entire SOX3 gene in both sibs, which was confirmed by quantitative real time PCR. Also, X chromosome inactivation assay showed random inactivation in both sibs. Whole exome sequencing revealed no pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. CMA of the parents showed normal results for both, suggesting that germline mosaicism could be the reason of recurrence of this duplication in the siblings. Our results support a pathogenic role of SOX3 overexpression in 46,XX subjects leading to variable DSD phenotypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the effect of the improvement of chromosome analysis on the cytogenetic findings of Turner syndrome (TS) patients., Methods: Retrospective study of the results of the karyotypes of 260 patients with TS, regarding banding techniques, number of cells analyzed and results of investigation of Y-chromosome sequences. According to karyotype, divided in 45,X; sex chromosome mosaicism without Y; structural aberrations of sex chromosomes with or without mosaicism; sex chromosome mosaicism with Y., Results: 45,X was the most frequent karyotype (108), followed by structural aberrations (88) and mosaics (58 without Y and 6 with Y). Introduction of banding techniques and increase in the number of cells analyzed resulted in progressive decrease of 45,X karyotype and increase of structural aberrations. The study of Y-chromosome sequences was performed in 96 cases of which 10 resulted positive., Conclusions: Improvement of chromosome analysis over the years has modified the cytogenetic profile of TS.