1. Identifying barriers and opportunities to facilitate the uptake of whole genome sequencing in paediatric haematology and oncology practice.
- Author
-
Bishop, Michelle, Vedi, Aditi, Bowdin, Sarah, Armstrong, Ruth, Bartram, Jack, Bentley, David, Ross, Mark, Hook, C. Elizabeth, Yin Chung, Brian Hon, Moss, Parker, Rowitch, David H., Tarpey, Patrick, Behjati, Sam, and Murray, Matthew J.
- Subjects
WHOLE genome sequencing ,MEDICAL personnel ,INFORMED consent (Medical law) ,PEDIATRIC oncology ,TURNAROUND time - Abstract
Background: The clinical utility of whole genome sequencing (WGS) in paediatric cancer has been demonstrated in recent years. WGS has been routinely available in the National Health Service (NHS) England for all children with cancer in England since 2021, but its uptake has been variable geographically. To explore the underlying barriers to routine use of WGS in this population across England and more widely in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Republic of Ireland (ROI), a one-day workshop was held in Cambridge, United Kingdom in October 2022. Methods: Following a series of talks, delegates participated in open, round-table discussions to outline local and broader challenges limiting routine WGS for diagnostic work-up for children with cancer in their Principal Treatment Centres (PTCs) and Genomic Laboratory Hubs (GLHs). Within smaller groups, delegates answered structured questions regarding clinical capability, education and training needs, and workforce competence and requirements. Data was recorded, centrally collated, and analysed following the event using thematic analysis. Results: Sixty participants attended the workshop with broad representation from the 20 PTCs across the UK and ROI and the seven GLHs in England. All healthcare professionals involved in the WGS pathway were represented, including paediatric oncologists, clinical geneticists, clinical scientists, and histopathologists. The main themes highlighted by the group in ensuring equitable access to WGS identified were: lack of knowledge equity between NHS trusts, with a perception of WGS being for research only; and perception of lack of financial support for the clinical process surrounding WGS, including lack of time to take informed consent from patients. The latter also included limited trained staff available for data interpretation, affecting the turnaround time for reporting. Finally, the need for an integrated digital pathway to order, track, and return data to clinicians was highlighted. Conclusion: At the workshop, the general motivation for including WGS in the diagnostic work up for children with cancer was high throughout the UK, however a perceived lack of resources and education opportunities limit the widespread use of this commissioned assay. This workshop has led to some recommendations to increase access to WGS in this population in England and more widely in the devolved national of the UK and the ROI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF