Search

Background: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is caused by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus and has a 13% global prevalence that is increasing. GERD symptoms negatively impact physical, social, and emotional quality of life. The Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) determine the efficacy of treatment but may not correlate with endoscopically estimated esophageal mucosal injury severity. We aimed to probe the correlation between FSSG, GSRS, and esophageal injury severity to evaluate whether these scores can predict GERD severity. Methods: A total of 2962 patients who underwent physical examinations, including upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, at the Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Japan, were enrolled in this study. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was used to diagnose fundic mucosal atrophy, reflux esophagitis based on the Los Angeles (LA) classification, gastroesophageal flap value function (GEFV) based on Hill's classification, and Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopic diagnoses were examined for correlations with FSSG and GSRS scores. Results: In reflux esophagitis, FSSG and GSRS scores correlated with LA-B and LA-C endoscopic diagnosis but not with LA-M and LA-A endoscopic findings. Multiple regression analysis results were similar. FSSG scores reflected advanced fundic gland mucosal atrophy, while GSRS scores associated with high grade of GEFV. Conclusions: This is the first report to examine the correlation between FSSG and GSRS scores and endoscopic findings in a relatively large patient population. Our findings suggest that these scores can diagnose the severity of reflux esophagitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE) remains controversial, even for high-risk populations. Our study aimed to evaluate the proportion of patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) who were not screened for BE or did not receive recommended BE surveillance screening. We then evaluated the relationship between cancer staging and screening/surveillance opportunities. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 187 patients from January 2016 to January 2022 with newly diagnosed EAC. Data extracted from patient charts included BE risk factors, and BE, endoscopic, and histologic history. Results: A total of 187 patients had a new diagnosis of EAC. Among this group, 44% had appropriate BE surveillance adherence, and 47% of patients met the criteria for BE screening but had not been screened prior to EAC diagnosis. Adherence to BE surveillance was associated with earlier stages of cancer on biopsy. No significant difference in cancer staging was found in those with missed BE screening opportunities. Discussion: Patients with a diagnosis of BE who adhered to surveillance guidelines had earlier stage EAC at diagnosis, which emphasizes the importance of surveillance. Most of those with an initial diagnosis of EAC had not received any BE screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disease of the esophagus characterized by the regurgitation of stomach contents into the esophagus, causing troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Among patients with GERD, around 30% of patients have visible mucosal damage, while 70% have normal esophageal mucosa. Accordingly, the optimal pharmacological treatment of GERD should address different disease manifestations, including symptoms, the mucosal damage when present, and possible chronic complications, including strictures, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Areas covered: Available medical treatments for GERD include proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs), histamine receptor antagonists (H2-RAs), prokinetics, and mucosal protectants, such as alginates, hyaluronic acid/chondroitin-sulfate, and poliprotect. Each compound has its own advantages and disadvantages, and knowledge of expected benefits and tips for their use is paramount for the success of treatment. In addition, the appropriateness of indications for initiating treatment is also crucial to achieve positive results when managing GERD patients. Expert opinion: PPIs, PCABs, H2-RAs, prokinetics, and mucosal protectants can all be used in patients with GERD, but careful assessment of patients' characteristics as well as advantages and disadvantages of each therapeutic compound is essential to ensure successful treatment of GERD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim Methods Results Conclusions The first step towards developing a screening strategy for Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the identification of individuals in the community. Currently available tools include endoscopy, less‐invasive non‐endoscopic devices, and non‐invasive risk stratification models. We evaluated the cost of potential strategies for identification of BE as a first step towards screening.Two hypothetical cohorts of the general population aged ≥ 50 years with BE prevalence rates of 1.9% and 6.8% were modeled. Four potential screening tools were evaluated: (i) risk stratification based on non‐weighted clinical factors according to US/European guidelines, (ii) weighted risk stratification using algorithmic models, (iii) less‐invasive devices such as Cytosponge + trefoil factor 3 (TFF3), and (iv) endoscopy. Using a decision‐analytic model, the cost per BE case identified and the cost‐effectiveness were compared for six potential BE screening strategies based on combinations of the four screening tools; (i) + (iv), (ii) + (iv), (iii) + (iv), (i) + (iii) + (iv), (ii) + (iii) + (iv), and only (iv).The cost per BE case identified was lowest for the weighted risk stratification followed by Cytosponge‐TFF3 then endoscopy strategy at both 1.9% and 6.8% BE prevalences (US$9282 and US$3406, respectively) although it was sensitive to the cost of less‐invasive devices. This strategy was also most cost‐effective for a BE prevalence of 1.9%. At BE prevalence of 6.8%, the Cytosponge‐TFF3 followed by endoscopy strategy was most cost‐effective.Incorporating weighted risk stratification and less‐invasive devices such as Cytosponge‐TFF3 into BE screening strategies has a potential to cost‐effectively identify BE in the community although device cost and the community prevalence of BE will impact the optimal strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a digestive disorder that can lead to chronic mucosal damage, causing esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal cancer. GERD currently affects about 13% of the world's population and represent a major public health concern due to the increasing prevalence and incidence. The aim of this study was to explore complementary strategies for GERD management based the natural compound palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), alone or associated with plant extracts with demonstrated anti-GERD activity (Zingiber officinale, Musa × paradisiaca, Opuntia ficus-indica and Olea europaea). For this purpose, two in vitro models based on the esophageal mucosa CP-B cell line were chosen. The first one was based on the exposure of esophageal cells to HCl, while the second one was based on lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment to cause a strong inflammatory cell response. Inflammation induced was assessed using a Luminex® assay, measuring the secretion of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-8 and TNF-α. Results obtained demonstrate that PEA strongly decreased the inflammatory response elicited by HCl exposure. Moreover, the effect of PEA was enhanced by the presence of natural extracts of Zingiber officinale, Musa × paradisiaca, Opuntia ficus-indica and Olea europaea. PEA should be considered as an anti-GERD natural compound of interest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Narrow band imaging‐magnifying endoscopy (NBI‐ME) is used to identify changes in mucosal or vascular pattern observed on GI endoscopy in real time on the basis of optical image enhancement.It has a significant role in early detection of dysplasia, premalignant, and Malignant lesions along with its depth of invasion. Materials and methods: Upper and lower GI endoscopy performed in 1742 patients who presented with gastrointestinal symptoms at this tertiary center over 5 years out of which 1623 were evaluated with both NBI‐ME and histopathology. Real time endoscopic assessment was performed. Targeted biopsies were taken for comparative analysis. Results: Of the 1742 patients, 119 were excluded from the study. 807 underwent upper GI endoscopy and 816 underwent lower GI endoscopy. Mean age of presentation was 38 +/− 2.7 years. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of NBI‐ME for neoplastic esophageal lesions were 96.3%, 90.6%, 91.1%, 96.03%, respectively. For Barrett's esophagus it was 95.4%, 90.7%, 86.1%, and 90.7%; For gastric neoplastic lesions the values were 96.1%, 91.04%, 83.8%, and 97.9%. For colorectal it was 96.7%, 91.3%, 88.0%, and 97.7%. Overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of NBI‐ME for neoplastic lesions (both upper and lower GI) were 96.2%, 91.0%, 96.2%, and 97.2%. Of the 1623 patients, 951 received medical management with regular surveillance and 672 patients with high‐grade dysplasia, premalignant, and malignant conditions underwent interventions in form of either endoscopy or surgery. Conclusion: NBI‐ME has a greater role and can be considered as an effective tool in making early diagnosis and guiding optimum treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The implementation of artificial intelligence in healthcare has gained significant momentum over the last decade, particularly in specialties where image analysis and object identification apply. In esophageal diseases, DL has been primarily employed for image analysis in upper digestive endoscopy and histopathological specimens. Recent efforts aim to expand DL utilization into further aspects of esophageal neoplasia, opening new frontiers in the management of esophageal cancer. This review aims to collectively summarize the published body of evidence on DL approaches for image analysis in the management of esophageal cancer. Esophageal cancer has a dismal prognosis and necessitates a multimodal and multidisciplinary approach from diagnosis to treatment. High-definition white-light endoscopy and histopathological confirmation remain the gold standard for the definitive diagnosis of premalignant and malignant lesions. Artificial intelligence using deep learning (DL) methods for image analysis constitutes a promising adjunct for the clinical endoscopist that could effectively decrease BE overdiagnosis and unnecessary surveillance, while also assisting in the timely detection of dysplastic BE and esophageal cancer. A plethora of studies published during the last five years have consistently reported highly accurate DL algorithms with comparable or superior performance compared to endoscopists. Recent efforts aim to expand DL utilization into further aspects of esophageal neoplasia management including histologic diagnosis, segmentation of gross tumor volume, pretreatment prediction and post-treatment evaluation of patient response to systemic therapy and operative guidance during minimally invasive esophagectomy. Our manuscript serves as an introduction to the growing literature of DL applications for image analysis in the management of esophageal neoplasia, concisely presenting all currently published studies. We also aim to guide the clinician across basic functional principles, evaluation metrics and limitations of DL for image recognition to facilitate the comprehension and critical evaluation of the presented studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) symptoms undergoing screening upper endoscopy for Barrett's esophagus (BE) frequently demonstrate columnar-lined epithelium, with forceps biopsies (FBs) failing to yield intestinal metaplasia (IM). Repeat endoscopy is then often necessary to confirm a BE diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the yield of IM leading to a diagnosis of BE by the addition of wide-area transepithelial sampling (WATS-3D) to FB in the screening of patients with GERD. METHODS: We performed a prospective registry study of patients with GERD undergoing screening upper endoscopy. Patients had both WATS-3D and FB. Patients were classified by their Z line appearance: regular, irregular (<1 cm columnar-lined epithelium), possible short-segment BE (1 to <3 cm), and possible long-segment BE (≥3 cm). Demographics, IM yield, and dysplasia yield were calculated. Adjunctive yield was defined as cases identified by WATS-3D not detected by FB, divided by cases detected by FB. Clinicians were asked if WATS-3D results affected patient management. RESULTS: Of 23,933 patients, 6,829 (28.5%) met endoscopic criteria for BE. Of these, 2,878 (42.1%) had IM identified by either FB or WATS-3D. Among patients fulfilling endoscopic criteria for BE, the adjunctive yield of WATS-3D was 76.5% and absolute yield was 18.1%. One thousand three hundred seventeen patients (19.3%) who fulfilled endoscopic BE criteria had IM detected solely by WATS-3D. Of 240 patients with dysplasia, 107 (44.6%) were found solely by WATS-3D. Among patients with positive WATS-3D but negative FB, the care plan changed in 90.7%. DISCUSSION: The addition of WATS-3D to FB in patients with GERD being screened for BE resulted in confirmation of BE in an additional one-fifth of patients. Furthermore, dysplasia diagnoses approximately doubled. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ronidazole compared to those who received ciprofloxacin alone. The combination regimen was associated with a lower risk of post-biopsy infection, including sepsis and hospitalization. The study suggests that the addition of metronidazole to the prophylactic antibiotic regimen may be beneficial in reducing infectious complications after TRUS biopsy.The fourth study investigated the impact of preoperative anemia on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. The study found that preoperative anemia was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, including surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, and prolonged hospital stay. The study suggests that preoperative management of anemia may be important in optimizing postoperative outcomes in bladder cancer patients.The fifth study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new technique called "tubeless" percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of kidney stones. The study found that tubeless PCNL was associated with shorter hospital stay, less postoperative pain, and faster recovery compared to conventional PCNL with a nephrostomy tube. The study suggests that tubeless PCNL may be a feasible and safe alternative for selected patients with kidney stones.These studies provide valuable insights into various aspects of urological surgery, including treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia, the impact of socio-economic factors on the use of erectile dysfunction medication, prophylactic antibiotic regimens for prostate biopsy, the role of preoperative anemia in bladder [Extracted from the article]

Background: Laparoscopic revisional surgery for recurrent hiatal hernia (HH) is technically demanding. Re-recurrences are common and esophageal hiatus mesh reinforcement might improve durability of the repair, thus minimizing the risk of re-herniation. Purpose: Assess safety and effectiveness of simple suture repair (no mesh group) vs. crural augmentation with a biosynthetic absorbable mesh (mesh group) in patients with recurrent HH. Methods: Observational retrospective study from September 2012 to December 2022. Only patients undergoing redo surgery for previous failures of hiatal hernia repair were enrolled. Surgical failure was defined as symptomatic recurrent HH with > 2 cm of gastric tissue above the diaphragmatic impression at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and/or swallow study. Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires were used to assess and preoperative and postoperative symptoms and quality of life. Results: One hundred four patients were included. Overall, 60 patients (57.7%) underwent mesh-reinforced cruroplasty, whereas 44 (42.3%) underwent simple suture cruroplasty. Mesh and no mesh groups had similar baseline demographics, symptoms, prevalence of esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus, and HH size. A composite crural repair was most commonly performed in the mesh group (38.3% vs. 20.5%; p = 0.07). In addition to cruroplasty, most patients (91%) underwent a Toupet fundoplication. The 90-day postoperative complication rate was 8.6%, and there was no mortality. Recurrent HH was diagnosed in 21 patients (20.2%) with a clinical trend toward reduced incidence in the mesh group (16.7% vs. 25%; p = 0.06). Compared to baseline, there was a statistically significant improvement of median GERD-HRQL score (p < 0.01) and all SF-36 items (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Laparoscopic revisional surgery for recurrent HH is safe and effective. Selective use of biosynthetic mesh may protect from early recurrence and has the potential to reduce re-herniation in the long-term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Surveillance of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE) is recommended to identify progression to dysplasia; however, the most cost-effective strategy remains unclear. Mutation of TP53 or aberrant expression of p53 have been associated with the development of dysplasia in BE. We sought to determine if surveillance intervals for BE could be stratified based on p53 expression. Methods A Markov model was developed for NDBE. Patients with NDBE underwent p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and those with abnormal p53 expression underwent surveillance endoscopy at 1 year, while patients with normal p53 expression underwent surveillance in 3 years. Patients with dysplasia underwent endoscopic therapy and surveillance. Results On base-case analysis, the strategy of stratifying surveillance based on abnormal p53 IHC was cost-effective relative to conventional surveillance and a natural history model, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $8258 for p53 IHC-based surveillance. Both the conventional and p53-stratified surveillance strategies dominated the natural history model. On probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the p53 IHC strategy ($28 652; 16.78 quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]) was more cost-effective than conventional surveillance ($25 679; 16.17 QALYs) with a net monetary benefit of $306 873 compared with conventional surveillance ($297 642), with an ICER <$50 000 in 96% of iterations. The p53-stratification strategy was associated with a 14% reduction in the overall endoscopy burden and a 59% increase in dysplasia detection. Conclusion A surveillance strategy for BE based on abnormal p53 IHC is cost-effective relative to a conventional surveillance strategy and is likely to be associated with higher rates of dysplasia diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The cancer risk for each length of Barrett's esophagus (BE) in Japanese is unknown. This nationwide, multi-institutional study aims to clarify the cancer risk by length of BE in the general Japanese population. Methods: Consecutive subjects who underwent upper endoscopic screening at 17 centers between 2013 and 2017 and had at least one follow-up endoscopy by December 2022 were included. The presence/absence of BE and, if present, its length were retrospectively assessed using the retrieved endoscopic images recorded at baseline. Information on the subsequent occurrence of esophageal adenocarcinoma and other upper gastrointestinal cancers was also collected. Cancer incidence was calculated and expressed as %/year. Results: A total of 33,478 subjects were enrolled, and 17,884 (53.4%), 10,641 (31.8%), 4889 (14.6%), and 64 (0.2%) were diagnosed as absent BE, BE < 1 cm, 1–3 cm, and ≥ 3 cm, respectively. During a median follow-up of 80 months, 11 cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma developed. The annual incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma is 0%/year for absent BE, 0.0032 (0.00066–0.013)%/year for BE < 1 cm, 0.026 (0.011–0.054)%/year for 1–3 cm, and 0.58 (0.042–2.11)%/year for ≥ 3 cm, respectively. Meanwhile, the incidence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric cancer were 0.039 (0.031–0.049)%/year and 0.16 (0.14–0.18)%/year, respectively. Conclusions: By enrolling a large number of subjects with long-term follow-up, this study demonstrated that the risk of cancer increased steadily with increasing length of BE in the Japanese population. Therefore, it is important to consider the length of BE when determining the management strategy for BE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has recently increased in Asia, including Japan. A system to identify individuals at high risk for Barrett's esophagus (BE), a pre-cancerous condition of esophageal adenocarcinoma, among the general population is needed to perform endoscopic surveillance appropriately. We therefore developed risk prediction scores for BE at health checkups in Japan. Methods: 4128 consecutive health checkup examinees were retrospectively enrolled from October 2021 to March 2022. A prediction score for BE was developed based on the linear transformation of β-regression coefficients in a multivariable regression model incorporating BE predictors. Internal validation was performed by evaluating discrimination and calibration of the prediction model. Results: Three prediction scores corresponding to BE based on its length were developed: all lengths, ≥ 1 cm, ≥ 2 cm. All scores were internally validated, and the model calibration was excellent. The performance of the prediction models was better for longer BE, with a c-statistic of 0.70 for BE ≥ 2 cm, than for shorter values. The prediction score for BE ≥ 2 cm yielded sensitivity and specificity of 52.9% and 78.6% in high-risk subjects and 91.2% and 29.3% in intermediate- or high-risk subjects, respectively. Conclusions: This prediction score can potentially increase the endoscopic detection of BE by identifying potentially high-risk individuals from the general population. This is the first report on developing a prediction score for BE that may suit the Japanese population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

EsopredictTM is a prognostic assay that risk-stratifies Barrett's esophagus patients to predict future progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Established based on foundational studies at Johns Hopkins University, a risk algorithm was developed and clinically validated in two independent studies (n = 320). EsopredictTM is currently offered as a clinical test under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) guidelines. Here we present the analytical validation by repeated testing of FFPE tissues (n = 26 patients), cell lines, and contrived DNA controls to determine assay performance regarding analytical sensitivity (as defined by the limit of detection (LOD)), analytical specificity (as defined by the limit of blank (LOB)), accuracy as determined from the average positive and negative agreement, repeatability, and reproducibility. The LOD for the assay at 1.5% DNA methylation was significantly higher than the LOB, as determined by an unmethylated DNA control (0% methylated DNA). Inter- and intra-assay average positive agreement (APA) were 88% and 94%, respectively, while average negative agreement (ANA) values were 90% and 94%, respectively. Average inter- and intra-assay precision were <9% and <5% coefficient of variation (CV), respectively. These results confirm that EsopredictTM is a highly reproducible, sensitive, and specific risk categorization assay for the prediction of progression to HGD or EAC within 5 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Oesophageal disorders and chronic liver disease are common worldwide and significantly impact quality of life. The intricate link between these conditions, including how oesophageal disorders like GERD, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal cancer affect and are affected by chronic liver disease, remains poorly understood. Aims: To review the relationship between oesophageal disorders and chronic liver disease, evaluating epidemiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic factors. Methods: We reviewed the literature on the relationship between oesophageal disorders and chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis, using the PubMed database Results: Oesophageal disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's oesophagus, oesophageal cancer, oesophageal motor disorders and oesophageal candidiasis are prevalent among individuals with cirrhosis, exacerbating the burden of liver disease. These diseases have a multifaceted symptomatology and pathogenic basis, posing a significant challenge in cirrhotic patients that necessitates careful diagnosis and management. Additionally, therapies frequently used for these diseases, such as proton pump inhibitors, require careful consideration in cirrhotic patients due to potential adverse effects and altered pharmacokinetics. Managing oesophageal disorders in cirrhotic patients requires a cautious approach due to possible interactions with medications and the risk of adverse effects. Furthermore, symptoms associated with these conditions are often exacerbated by common interventions in patients with cirrhosis, such as band ligation for oesophageal varices. Conclusions: Oesophageal disorders are common in cirrhosis and increase the disease burden. These conditions require careful management due to complex symptoms and treatment risks. Proton pump inhibitors and other therapies must be used cautiously, as cirrhosis interventions can worsen symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document includes summaries of three articles from the Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. The first article discusses the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of an ultra-low volume bowel preparation called NER1006. The study found that NER1006 was a safe and effective option for bowel preparation, with high scores on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale and positive quality indicators for colonoscopy. The second article focuses on the recurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms after cessation of vonoprazan therapy. The study found that the presence of a hiatal hernia was a significant predictor for symptomatic recurrence of GERD. The third article discusses the establishment of a tertiary faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) service and its outcomes. The study found that FMT was effective in treating recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and had a high rate of primary response and cure. [Extracted from the article]

This document is a compilation of articles discussing advanced endoscopic techniques in gastroenterology and hepatology. The studies show that these techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition, are effective and safe with high diagnostic accuracy and low complication rates. However, further research is needed to improve outcomes and identify factors associated with successful response to endoscopic drainage. The document also highlights the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy in investigating pancreatic masses and the potential use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage as a primary intervention for elderly and frail patients with acute cholecystitis. [Extracted from the article]

This document contains a collection of abstracts summarizing various research studies related to surgery and patient outcomes. The studies cover a range of topics, including the role of Emergency General Surgery surgeons, prognostic markers for cancer patients, predictive models for surgical site infections, endoscopic histopathology results, and the use of nanoparticles in cancer treatment. Other studies explore topics such as surgical site infections, cholecystectomy in children, remote postoperative surveillance, and the use of inhaled methoxyflurane for abscess drainage. These abstracts provide valuable insights into surgical practices and outcomes, which can inform future research and decision-making in the field of surgery. [Extracted from the article]

Objectives Methods Results Conclusion Endoscopic resection is the preferred approach to treat early Barrett's neoplasia, reducing the need for surgical interventions. However, the best choice between endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remains unclear. The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of EMR vs. ESD for early Barrett's neoplasia.An electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Central Cochrane, EMBASE, and LILACS until November 2023. Studies comparing ESD vs. EMR in the treatment of patients with early Barrett's neoplasia were included. This study was performed according to the Preferred Report Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines. The ROBIN‐I tool was used to analyze the risk of bias and GRADE to measure the quality of the evidence.A total of 9352 patients from 15 observational studies were included. Patients undergoing ESD had significantly higher rates of en‐bloc (odds ratio [OR] 25.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 13.82, 48.74; I2 = 52%; P < 0.00001) and R0 (OR 5.10, 95% CI 3.29, 7.91; I2 = 73%; P < 0.00001) with a higher risk of adverse events, including bleeding, stricture formation, and perforation. In a subgroup analysis of patients who did not receive radiofrequency ablation, ESD had a lower recurrence rate than EMR (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05, 0.94; I2 = 88%; P = 0.04).Endoscopic submucosal dissection is more effective than EMR in treating early Barrett's neoplasia at the expense of higher adverse events rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common precancerous lesion that can progress to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). There are significant alterations in the esophageal microbiome in the progression from healthy esophagus to BE to EAC, including an increased abundance of a variety of lactate-producing bacteria and an increase of lactate in the tumor microenvironment, as predicted by metabolic modeling. The role of bacterial lactate in EAC is unknown. Here, we utilize patient-derived organoid (PDO) models of EAC and demonstrate that lactate inhibits the growth and proliferation of EAC PDOs through alterations in the tumor NADH/NAD+ redox state. Further RNA sequencing of EAC PDOs identifies ID1 and RSAD2 as potential regulatory molecules crucial in mediating lactate's ability to suppress glycolysis and proliferation. Gene ontology analysis also identifies the activation of inflammatory and immunological pathways in addition to alterations in the metabolic pathways in EAC PDOs exposed to lactate, suggesting a multi-faceted role for lactate in the pathogenesis of EAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) combining endoscopic resection (ER) with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) followed by ablation is the standard of care for the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). We have previously shown comparable rates of complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM) with both approaches. However, data comparing recurrence after CRIM are lacking. We compared rates of recurrence after CRIM with both techniques in a multicenter cohort. METHODS: Patients undergoing EET achieving CRIM at 3 academic institutions were included. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted. Outcomes included rates and predictors of any BE and dysplastic BE recurrence in the 2 groups. Cox-proportional hazards models and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 621 patients (514 EMR and 107 ESD) achieving CRIM were included in the recurrence analysis. The incidence of any BE (15.7, 5.7 per 100 patient-years) and dysplastic BE recurrence (7.3, 5.3 per 100 patient-years) were comparable in the EMR and ESD groups, respectively. On multivariable analyses, the chances of BE recurrence were not influenced by ER technique (hazard ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.51-1.49; P = 0.62), which was also confirmed by IPTW analysis (ESD vs EMR: hazard ratio 0.98; 95% confidence interval 0.56-1.73; P = 0.94). BE length, lesion size, and history of cigarette smoking were independent predictors of BE recurrence. DISCUSSION: Patients with BE dysplasia/neoplasia achieving CRIM, initially treated with EMR/ablation, had comparable recurrence rates to ESD/ablation. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these outcomes between the 2 ER techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Screening for early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) may potentially reduce EAC-related mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to examine the Dutch population's intended uptake of 3 hypothetical EAC screening test scenarios and preferences for potential future organization. METHODS: A total of 8,350 Dutch individuals aged 45-75 years were invited, of whom 2,258 completed a web-based survey. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 hypothetical screening test scenarios (i.e., transnasal endoscopy, ingestible cell collection device, or breath analysis). The primary outcome was intended uptake. Secondary outcomes included acceptance of screening eligibility criteria and preferences regarding invitation, counseling, and diagnostic follow-up. We performed exploratory univariable and multivariable regression analyses to assess which determinants were associated with EAC screening intent. RESULTS: Intended uptake of screening was highest in the breath analysis scenario (95%), followed by conventional upper endoscopy (78%), an ingestible cell collection device (75%), and transnasal endoscopy (68%) (P < 0.001). Anticipating discomfort was most strongly associated with decreased intention to undergo transnasal endoscopy (odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.29) or swallow a cell collection device (odds ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.32). Cancer worry and high acceptance of test sensitivity/specificity were consistently associated with a positive intention to participate in screening. Inviting persons for screening based on gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, age, or the output of a risk prediction model was acceptable to 74%, 69%, and 66%, respectively. Inviting only men was acceptable for only 41% of women. The majority (58%) preferred to be invited by a public health organization, and 32% of the participants preferred to discuss their decision to participate with a healthcare professional. DISCUSSION: Participants in this study self-selected through a web-based survey, potentially introducing selection bias. Participants generally intended to participate in EAC screening, although the level of intent depended on the discomfort and performance associated with the offered screening test. Determining eligibility based on gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, age, or a risk calculator, but not sex, would be acceptable to most individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cryoablation therapy is an emerging modality in the treatment of Barrett's esophagus. Our systematic review collected data on this technique to provide evidence of its efficacy and safety and to compare it with the established RFA. The results from twenty-three studies revealed that the complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia was comparable between RFA and cryoablation. More specifically, cryoablation achieved a complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia at rates of 84.2% (95%CI: 79.1–89.3) and 64.1% (95%CI: 49.2–79.0), respectively, whereas 8.3% (95%CI: 4.7–11.9) of cases presented with recurrence. Studies on cryoballoons seem to be more homogenous in terms of dysplasia treatment, complications, and, especially, strictures. Background: The mainstay approach in endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE) includes the endoscopic resection of visible lesions, accompanied by ablation of the residual metaplastic epithelium. Cryoablation therapy is one such emerging ablation technique in this field. This systematic review with a meta-analysis aims to accumulate pooled data on cryoablation performance in the treatment of patients with BE and to compare this technique to the standard of care radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Methods: The MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were searched until June 2024 for studies evaluating BE management using cryoablation for cumulative results. The primary outcome was the complete eradication of dysplasia (CED) and intestinal metaplasia (CEIM) in BE compared to RFA, while secondary outcomes included the respective pooled rates using cryoablation, recurrence, and adverse events, with a separate analysis for strictures. The meta-analyses were based on a random-effects model, and the results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses by type of cryoablation were also performed. Results: Twenty-three studies (1604 patients) were finally included, four of which were comparative. CED and CEIM did not differ significantly between cryoablation and RFA [OR= 0.95 (95%CI: 0.50–1.81) and OR = 0.57 (95%CI: 0.20–1.63), respectively)]. The pooled rates of CED, CEIM, and recurrence after cryoablation were 84.2% (95%CI: 79.1–89.3), 64.1% (95%CI: 49.2–79.0), and 8.3% (95%CI: 4.7–11.9), accompanied by high rates of heterogeneity. Adverse events were noted in 14.5% (95%CI: 9.9–19.2) of cases, and 6.5% (95%CI: 4.1–9.0) developed strictures. In the subgroup analysis, the cryoballoon achieved a reduction in heterogeneity in CED, adverse events, and stricture formation, whereas spray catheters provided homogenous results in terms of recurrence. Conclusions: Cryoablation provides equal outcomes compared to RFA in the treatment of patients with BE, with the cryoballoon achieving relatively homogenous rates of CED and adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is one of the most malignant tumors in the digestive system. To make thing worse, the scarcity of treatment options is disheartening. However, if detected early, there is a possibility of reversing the condition. Unfortunately, there is still a lack of relevant early screening methods. Considering that Barrett's esophagus (BE), a precursor lesion of EAC, has been confirmed as the only known precursor of EAC. Analyzing which BE cases will progress to EAC and understanding the processes and mechanisms involved is of great significance for early screening of such patients. Considering the significant alterations in the gut microbiota of patients with BE and its potential role in the progression to EAC, this study aims to analyze the relationship between BE, EAC, and GM to identify potential diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. This study utilized comprehensive statistical data on gut microbiota from a large-scale genome-wide association meta-analysis conducted by the MiBioGen consortium (n = 18,340). Subsequently, we selected a set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that fell below the genome-wide significance threshold (1 × 10–5) as instrumental variables. To investigate the causal relationship between gut microbiota and BE and EAC, we employed various MR analysis methods, including Inverse Variance Weighting (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median (WM), and weighted mean. Additionally, we assessed the level of pleiotropy, heterogeneity, and stability of genetic variations through MR-Egger intercept test, MR-PRESSO, Cochran's Q test, and "leave-one-out" sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, we conducted reverse MR analysis to identify the causal relationships between gut microbiota and BE and EAC. The results from the Inverse Variance-Weighted (IVW) analysis indicate that Alistipes (P = 4.86 × 10−2), Lactobacillus (P = 2.11 × 10−2), Prevotella 7 (P = 4.28 × 10−2), and RuminococcaceaeUCG004 (P = 4.34 × 10−2) are risk factors for Barrett's esophagus (BE), while Flavonifractor (P = 8.81 × 10−3) and RuminococcaceaeUCG004 (P = 4.99 × 10−2) are risk factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). On the other hand, certain gut microbiota genera appear to have a protective effect against both BE and EAC. These include Eubacterium (nodatum group) (P = 4.51 × 10−2), Holdemania (P = 1.22 × 10−2), and Lactococcus (P = 3.39 × 10−2) in the BE cohort, as well as Eubacterium (hallii group) (P = 4.07 × 10−2) and Actinomyces (P = 3.62 × 10−3) in the EAC cohort. According to the results of reverse MR analysis, no significant causal effects of BE and EAC on gut microbiota were observed. Furthermore, no significant heterogeneity or pleiotropy was detected in the instrumental variables. We have established a causal relationship between the gut microbiota and BE and EAC. This study holds profound significance for screening BE patients who may be at risk of deterioration, as it can provide them with timely medical interventions to reverse the condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mucosal impedance is a marker of esophageal mucosal integrity and a novel technique for assessing esophageal function and pathology. This article highlights its development and clinical application for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Barrett's esophagus, and eosinophilic esophagitis. A narrative review of key publications describing the development and use of mucosal impedance in clinical practice was conducted. A low mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) has been shown to be an independent predictor of response to anti-reflux therapy. MNBI predicts medication-responsive heartburn better than distal esophageal acid exposure time. Patients with equivocal evidence of GERD using conventional methods, with a low MNBI, had an improvement in symptoms following the initiation of PPI therapy compared to those with a normal MNBI. A similar trend was seen in a post fundoplication cohort. Strong clinical utility for the use of mucosal impedance in assessing eosinophilic esophagitis has been repeatedly demonstrated; however, there is minimal direction for application in Barrett's esophagus. The authors conclude that mucosal impedance has potential clinical utility for the assessment and diagnosis of GERD, particularly when conventional investigations have yielded equivocal results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Benign and malignant diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract show gender-specific differences. The frequent gastroesophageal reflux disease is a prime example: men have an erosive reflux disease more often than women and are also younger at the time of onset. The rate of progression to a metaplastic Barrett's esophagus is also higher in men. In the case of achalasia, there are indications that surgical treatment by laparoscopic Heller's myotomy and semifundoplication 180° according to Dor leads to a markedly better improvement in the symptoms in women compared to men, although they showed a more pronounced dilation of the tubular esophagus. The female hormone status influences the localization and histopathology of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and gastric carcinoma. Premenopausal and postmenopausal carcinomas differ significantly in women. In addition, high microsatellite instability (MSI high) is more frequent in women and is associated with a generally significantly better prognosis. The MSI high gastric carcinomas of women show better survival than MSI high carcinomas of men. The future inclusion of gender-specific aspects in studies of the upper gastrointestinal tract is desirable in order to generate adequate data and to enable differentiated treatment stratification in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for Barrett's neoplasia recurrence after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Methods Data from patients at 16 centers were collected for a multicenter retrospective study. Patients who underwent at least one RFA treatment for Barrett's esophagus and thereafter underwent further esophageal ESD for neoplasia recurrence were included. Results Data from 56 patients who underwent salvage ESD between April 2014 and November 2022 were collected. Immediate complications included one muscular tear (1.8%) treated with stent (Agree classification: grade IIIa). Two transmural perforations (3.6%; treated with clips) and five muscular tears (8.9%; two treated with clips) had no clinical impact and were not considered as adverse events. Seven patients (12.5%) developed strictures (grade IIIa), which were treated with balloon dilation. Histological analysis showed 36 adenocarcinoma, 17 high grade dysplasia, and 3 low grade dysplasia. En bloc and R0 resection rates were 89.3% and 66.1%, respectively. Resections were curative in 33 patients (58.9%), and noncurative in 22 patients (39.3%), including 11 "local risk" (19.6%) and 11 "high risk" (19.6%) resections. At the end of follow-up with a median time of 14 (0–75) months after salvage ESD, and with further endoscopic treatment if necessary (RFA, argon plasma coagulation, endoscopic mucosal resection, ESD), neoplasia remission ratio was 37/53 (69.8%) and the median remission time was 13 (1–75) months. Conclusion In expert hands, salvage ESD was a safe and effective treatment for recurrence of Barrett's neoplasia after RFA treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This study evaluated the effect of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support system on the performance and diagnostic confidence of endoscopists in their assessment of Barrett's esophagus (BE). Methods 96 standardized endoscopy videos were assessed by 22 endoscopists with varying degrees of BE experience from 12 centers. Assessment was randomized into two video sets: group A (review first without AI and second with AI) and group B (review first with AI and second without AI). Endoscopists were required to evaluate each video for the presence of Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia (BERN) and then decide on a spot for a targeted biopsy. After the second assessment, they were allowed to change their clinical decision and confidence level. Results AI had a stand-alone sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.2%, 68.9%, and 81.3%, respectively. Without AI, BE experts had an overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 83.3%, 58.1%, and 71.5%, respectively. With AI, BE nonexperts showed a significant improvement in sensitivity and specificity when videos were assessed a second time with AI (sensitivity 69.8% [95%CI 65.2%–74.2%] to 78.0% [95%CI 74.0%–82.0%]; specificity 67.3% [95%CI 62.5%–72.2%] to 72.7% [95%CI 68.2%–77.3%]). In addition, the diagnostic confidence of BE nonexperts improved significantly with AI. Conclusion BE nonexperts benefitted significantly from additional AI. BE experts and nonexperts remained significantly below the stand-alone performance of AI, suggesting that there may be other factors influencing endoscopists' decisions to follow or discard AI advice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Various deep learning models, based on convolutional neural network (CNN), have been shown to improve the detection of early esophageal neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Vision transformer (ViT), derived from natural language processing, has emerged as the new state‐of‐the‐art for image recognition, outperforming predecessors such as CNN. This pilot study explores the use of ViT to classify the presence or absence of early esophageal neoplasia in endoscopic images of Barrett's esophagus. Methods: A BO dataset of 1918 images of Barrett's esophagus from 267 unique patients was used. The images were classified as dysplastic (D‐BO) or non‐dysplastic (ND‐BO). A pretrained vision transformer model, ViTBase16, was used to develop our classifier models. Three ViT models were developed for comparison based on imaging modality: white‐light imaging (WLI), narrow‐band imaging (NBI), and combined modalities. Performance of each model was evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, confusion matrices, and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: The ViT models demonstrated the following performance: WLI‐ViT (Accuracy: 92%, Sensitivity: 82%, Specificity: 95%), NBI‐ViT (Accuracy: 99%, Sensitivity: 97%, Specificity: 99%), and combined modalities‐ViT (Accuracy: 93%, Sensitivity: 87%, Specificity: 95%). Combined modalities‐ViT showed greater accuracy (94% vs 90%) and sensitivity (80% vs 70%) compared with WLI‐ViT when classifying WLI images on a subgroup testing set. Conclusion: ViT exhibited high accuracy in classifying the presence or absence of EON in endoscopic images of Barrett's esophagus. ViT has the potential to be widely applicable to other endoscopic diagnoses of gastrointestinal diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Novel, less-invasive technologies to screen for Barretts esophagus (BE) may enable a paradigm shift in early detection strategies for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Understanding professionals perspectives on screening is important to determine how to proceed. We aimed to explore and compare professionals perceptions of screening for BE and EAC screening in three countries. METHODS: In this study, 29 Dutch, 20 British and 18 American health care professionals (clinicians, researchers and policy makers) participated in concept mapping: a mixed-methods consensus building methodology. Statements on perceived barriers, facilitators, advantages, disadvantages, implications or worries associated with screening for BE and EAC were collected in asynchronous digital brainstorm sessions. Subsequently, participants sorted the statements into groups according to thematic similarity and assessed the relevance of each statement in evaluating the acceptability of BE and EAC screening. Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis were used to map the associations between generated statements. RESULTS: Professionals across three countries identified eight consistent themes that relate to their perceptions of screening for BE and EAC: (1) Benefits, (2) Harms, (3) Clinical effectiveness concerns, (4) Screening population, (5) Screening modality, (6) Resources, (7) Ownership, and (8) Public communication. Dutch and American professionals prioritized the potential health benefits of screening but also questioned clinical impact. In contrast, British participants prioritized identification of the screening population and suitable test. CONCLUSIONS: Most professionals see potential in less-invasive screening tests for BE and EAC but underline the need to define the target screening population and determine benefits and harms before widely employing them. Successful implementation will require thoughtful consideration of the involvement of general practitioners, readiness of endoscopy and pathology services, balanced public communication, and country-specific regulations.

Previous studies have suggested a potential association between irritability and the risk of various diseases. However, establishing a causal relationship has remained a significant challenge. To address this issue, we employed Mendelian randomization (MR), a sophisticated approach that leverages genotype data to emulate the conditions of randomized controlled trials. This method enables us to investigate the potential causal link between irritability and the susceptibility to esophageal diseases. We conducted an extensive multivariable MR analysis using summary-level data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) encompassing various esophageal diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophageal cancer (EC), and Barrett's esophagus. Both univariable and multivariable MR analyses were performed to elucidate and confirm the causal association between genetically predicted irritability and the incidence of esophageal diseases. Based on our primary causal effects model utilizing MR analyses with the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, genetically predicted irritability was identified as a risk factor for GERD (OR = 2.413; 95 % CI: 1.678–3.470; P = 2.03E-06) and Barrett's esophagus (OR = 2.306; 95 % CI: 1.042–5.101; P = 0.039). However, irritability was not found to be associated with the risk of EC, even after adjusting for BMI, smoking initiation, and alcohol consumption. The multivariable MR analysis performed in this study demonstrated a causal relationship between irritability and esophageal diseases. It is imperative to acknowledge the need for further large-scale prospective studies to validate these findings. [Display omitted] • Established a causal relationship between irritability and esophageal diseases. • Irritability is linked to a higher risk of GERD and Barrett's esophagus. • No significant association was found between irritability and the risk of EC. • Managing irritability may help prevent certain esophageal diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Obesity and related comorbidities are on the rise, with trends showing that nearly half of the United States population will be obese by 2030. This review focuses on the pathophysiology of esophageal disorders in patients with obesity as well as treatment considerations for obesity in patients with esophageal disorders. Recent Findings: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is prevalent in approximately 20% of patients with obesity and is associated with multiple underlying anatomic risk factors. In addition, systemic and paracrine proinflammatory effects mediated by visceral adipose tissue also contribute to the development of GERD-related complications such as erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Esophageal dysmotility is also common in obesity, although with varying clinical impact as the majority of patients are asymptomatic. Although data regarding laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and GERD is conflicting, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is considered the preferred surgical approach for obesity in patients with GERD. Recent data signal that newer anti-obesity medications like glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists may lead to increased GERD and related complications; however, data on this subject is limited. Summary: Esophageal dysfunction is prevalent in patients with obesity and should be carefully evaluated prior to considering treatment for obesity such as bariatric surgery or antiobesity medications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: to present data on the role of bile acids in the progression of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and the development of esophageal dysplasia and adenocarcinoma and to provide a rationale for the use of ursodeoxycholic acid in addition to basic therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).Key points. The prevalence of GERD in the world is 13.98 %. In the absence of the necessary treatment or non-compliance with the recommended regimens and duration of drug use, complications of GERD develop such as stricture, bleeding, BE, which, in turn, is a risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The basic therapy for GERD is proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), but up to 40 % of patients do not fully respond to PPI monotherapy, which indicates the need to consider, among the factors in the pathogenesis of GERD, the persistence of weakly acidic and weakly alkaline refluxes, the presence of which can be diagnosed by performing 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring. It has been proven that refluxate is predominantly acidic in nature in 50 % of patients with GERD, acidic with a bile component in 39.7 %, and 10.3 % of patients have bile reflux. The weaklly alkaline nature of reflux, due to the presence of duodenal contents, significantly increases the incidence of intestinal metaplasia with dysplasia and EAC compared to acidic pH values. Therefore, stopping duodenal reflux may be an important step in preventing the development of EAC. Among the components of duodenal contents that have a damaging effect on the mucous membrane of the esophagus, the role of bile acids has been most studied. The presence of hydrophobic bile acids, namely deoxycholic acid (DCA), is associated with oxidative DNA damage in lesions of intestinal-type columnar cell metaplasia. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a hydrophilic bile acid, is a natural competitive inhibitor of DCA and prevents DNA damage and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation caused by toxic bile acids in BE epithelial cells. The cytoprotective effect of UDCA, aimed at preventing DNA damage and increasing the reparative capacity of cells in the metaplastic epithelium of the BE, allows us to consider this drug as a means of chemoprophylaxis in patients diagnosed with GERD.Conclusion. The addition of UDCA drugs to the basic therapy is pathogenetically justified in patients with GERD in the presence of duodenogastroesophageal reflux. Prescribing complex therapy will reduce the incidence of esophagitis, progression of BE with the development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma caused by exposure to bile acids.

Abstract The association of overweight/obesity and metabolically unhealthy (MU) with the risk of developing Barrett's esophagus (BE) remains uncertain. We evaluated whether MU and overweight/obesity are associated with increased BE incidence and whether they have a synergistic impact on BE development. We analyzed the body mass index (BMI) and metabolic indicators at baseline of 402,510 individuals from the UK Biobank with no history of BE. Overweight/obesity and MU were defined as BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2 and presence of ≥ 1 MU indicators, respectively. Accordingly, the participants were categorized into four groups: (1) metabolically healthy non-overweight/obesity (MHNO), (2) metabolically unhealthy non-overweight/obesity (MUNO), (3) metabolically healthy overweight/obesity (MHO), and (4) metabolically unhealthy overweight/obesity (MUO). During a median follow-up of 13.5 years, 6195 (1.5%) individuals were newly diagnosed with BE. Among them, 39,281 (9.8%), 92,000 (22.9%), 25,297 (6.3%), and 245,932 (61.1%) individuals were classified as MHNO, MUNO, MHO, and MUO, respectively. In Cox regression analyses, both MU and overweight/obesity were independently associated with BE incidence. Moreover, BE incidence was significantly higher in the MUNO, MHO, and MUO groups, compared to the MHNO group. MU and overweight/obesity are independent risk factors for BE and have a synergistic effect on BE development.

Abstract Introduction The incidence of esophageal cancers is increasing in many Western countries and the rate of missed esophageal cancers (MEC) at upper endoscopy is of concern. We aimed to calculate the MEC rate and identify factors associated with MEC. Methods This was a retrospective population-based cohort study including 613 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer in Central Norway 2004–2021. MEC was defined as esophageal cancer diagnosed 6–36 months after a non-diagnostic upper endoscopy. Patient characteristics, tumor localization, histological type and cTNM stage were recorded. Symptoms, endoscopic findings, use of sedation and endoscopists experience at the endoscopy prior to esophageal cancer diagnosis and at the time of diagnosis were recorded. The association between these factors and MEC was assessed. Results Forty-nine (8.0%) of 613 cancers were MEC. There was a significant increase in annual numbers of esophageal cancer (p

Abstract Background Particulate matter exposure (PM) is a cause of aerodigestive disease globally. The destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) exposed first responders and inhabitants of New York City to WTC-PM and caused obstructive airways disease (OAD), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett’s Esophagus (BE). GERD not only diminishes health-related quality of life but also gives rise to complications that extend beyond the scope of BE. GERD can incite or exacerbate allergies, sinusitis, bronchitis, and asthma. Disease features of the aerodigestive axis can overlap, often necessitating more invasive diagnostic testing and treatment modalities. This presents a need to develop novel non-invasive biomarkers of GERD, BE, airway hyperreactivity (AHR), treatment efficacy, and severity of symptoms. Methods Our observational case-cohort study will leverage the longitudinally phenotyped Fire Department of New York (FDNY)-WTC exposed cohort to identify Biomarkers of Airway Disease, Barrett’s and Underdiagnosed Reflux Noninvasively (BAD-BURN). Our study population consists of n = 4,192 individuals from which we have randomly selected a sub-cohort control group (n = 837). We will then recruit subgroups of i. AHR only ii. GERD only iii. BE iv. GERD/BE and AHR overlap or v. No GERD or AHR, from the sub-cohort control group. We will then phenotype and examine non-invasive biomarkers of these subgroups to identify under-diagnosis and/or treatment efficacy. The findings may further contribute to the development of future biologically plausible therapies, ultimately enhance patient care and quality of life. Discussion Although many studies have suggested interdependence between airway and digestive diseases, the causative factors and specific mechanisms remain unclear. The detection of the disease is further complicated by the invasiveness of conventional GERD diagnosis procedures and the limited availability of disease-specific biomarkers. The management of reflux is important, as it directly increases risk of cancer and negatively impacts quality of life. Therefore, it is vital to develop novel noninvasive disease markers that can effectively phenotype, facilitate early diagnosis of premalignant disease and identify potential therapeutic targets to improve patient care. Trial registration Name of Primary Registry: “Biomarkers of Airway Disease, Barrett's and Underdiagnosed Reflux Noninvasively (BADBURN)”. Trial Identifying Number: NCT05216133 . Date of Registration: January 31, 2022.

Abstract The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has surged by 600% in recent decades, with a dismal 5-year survival rate of just 15%. Barrett’s esophagus (BE), affecting about 2% of the population, raises the risk of EAC by 40-fold. Despite this, the transcriptomic changes during the BE to EAC progression remain unclear. Our study addresses this gap through comprehensive transcriptomic profiling to identify key mRNA signatures and genomic alterations, such as gene fusions. We performed RNA-sequencing on BE and EAC tissues from 8 individuals, followed by differential gene expression, pathway and network analysis, and gene fusion prediction. We identified mRNA changes during the BE-to-EAC transition and validated our results with single-cell RNA-seq datasets. We observed upregulation of keratin family members in EAC and confirmed increased levels of keratin 14 (KRT14) using immunofluorescence. More differentiated BE marker genes are downregulated during progression to EAC, suggesting undifferentiated BE subpopulations contribute to EAC. We also identified several gene fusions absent in paired BE and normal esophagus but present in EAC. Our findings are critical for the BE-to-EAC transition and have the potential to promote early diagnosis, prevention, and improved treatment strategies for EAC.

Barrett's esophagus is a pathological condition that develops as a result of metaplastic transformation of the stratified squamous non-keratinized epithelium of the mucous membrane of the distal esophagus into columnar epithelium of the intestinal type[13]. The objective of this review was to furnish information on new hypotheses and mechanisms concerning the development of Barrett's esophagus, with the aim of identifying trends in this area and advancing understanding of the disease's pathogenesis for the prevention of esophageal adenocarcinoma. A literary analysis of recent articles was conducted to investigate the mechanisms underlying the development of Barrett's esophagus. During the review of extensive literature, in addition to the classic theory of esophageal cell replacement, new mechanisms of cell transdifferentiation and transcommitment were identified. Much remains unknown, particularly regarding the originating cell population and the molecular events or stages through which Barrett's esophagus progresses to esophageal adenocarcinoma. These are crucial questions for researchers, the answers to which will significantly impact disease prevention and treatment. Despite the currently limited experimental model systems available for studying Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma, innovations in tissue engineering and organotypic cell culture systems based on human cells offer great prospects as platforms for future investigations into the pathogenesis and progression of these diseases.

Introduction: The incidence of esophageal cancers is increasing in many Western countries and the rate of missed esophageal cancers (MEC) at upper endoscopy is of concern. We aimed to calculate the MEC rate and identify factors associated with MEC. Methods: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study including 613 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer in Central Norway 2004–2021. MEC was defined as esophageal cancer diagnosed 6–36 months after a non-diagnostic upper endoscopy. Patient characteristics, tumor localization, histological type and cTNM stage were recorded. Symptoms, endoscopic findings, use of sedation and endoscopists experience at the endoscopy prior to esophageal cancer diagnosis and at the time of diagnosis were recorded. The association between these factors and MEC was assessed. Results: Forty-nine (8.0%) of 613 cancers were MEC. There was a significant increase in annual numbers of esophageal cancer (p < 0.001) as well as of MEC (p = 0.009), but MEC rate did not change significantly (p = 0.382). The median time from prior upper endoscopy to MEC diagnosis was 22.9 (12.1–28.6) months. MEC patients were older and were diagnosed with disease with a lower cTNM stage and cT category than non-missed cancers, whereas tumor localization and histological type were similar between the groups. The use of sedation or endoscopist experience did not differ between the endoscopy prior to esophageal cancer diagnosis and at the time of diagnosis. High proportions of MEC patients had Barrett's esophagus (n = 25, 51.0%), hiatus hernia (n = 26, 53.1%), esophagitis (n = 10, 20.4%) or ulceration (n = 4, 8.2%). Significant proportions of MECs were diagnosed after inappropriate follow-up of endoscopic Barrett's esophagus, histological dysplasia or ulcerations. Conclusions: The annual number of MEC increased during the study period, while the MEC rate remained unchanged. Endoscopic findings related to gastroesophageal reflux disease such as esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus were identified in a high proportion of patients with subsequent MECs. Cautious follow-up of these patients could potentially reduce MEC-rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although heartburn and reflux are frequently reported in ulcerative colitis [UC], the correlation between UC and gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD], and its complications, esophageal stricture and Barrett's esophagus [BE], is not well understood. This study aims to examine the prevalence and associated risk of GERD and its complications within the UC population. Methods: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset, consisting of 7,159,694 patients, comparing GERD patients with and without UC to those without GERD. We assessed the degree of colonic involvement in UC and the occurrence of esophageal complications. Bivariate analyses were conducted using the chi-squared test or Fisher exact test (two-tailed). Results: A higher prevalence of GERD (23.0% vs. 16.5%) and GERD phenotypes, such as non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) (22.3% vs. 16%) and erosive esophagitis (EE) (1.2% vs. 0.6%), was found in UC patients (p < 0.01), including pancolitis, proctitis, proctosigmoiditis, left-sided colitis, and indetermined UC (with undefined colonic involvement). UC patients were more likely to develop GERD (1.421), NERD (1.407), and EE (1.681) (p < 0.01). A higher prevalence of esophageal stricture (16.9 vs. 11.4 per 10,000 patients) and BE without dysplasia (94.5 vs. 39.3 per 10,000 patients) was found in UC (p < 0.05). The odds of developing BE without dysplasia were higher (1.892) in patients with UC (p < 0.01), including ulcerative pancolitis, proctitis, and indeterminate UC (OR of 1.657, 3.328, and 1.996, respectively) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates an increased risk of developing GERD and its complications in UC. This highlights the importance of vigilant monitoring and early intervention to minimize associated GERD-related risks in patients with UC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Guidelines recommend BE screening in populations with multiple risk factors, for which non-endoscopic esophageal cell collection with biomarker testing is considered as an acceptable alternative to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The aim of this study was to evaluate analytical performance characteristics of EsoGuard® (EG), a DNA methylation biomarker assay, as a laboratory-developed test (LDT) in esophageal samples collected with the swallowable EsoCheck® (EC) device. EG is a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay that evaluates methylated vimentin (VIM) and cyclin A1 (CCNA1), clinically validated biomarkers for the detection of BE and EAC. The studies were conducted according to standards of College of American Pathology (CAP), Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), and New York (NY) state requirements for the analytical validation of molecular assays. Comparison to Sanger sequencing showed that EG was 100% accurate at all 31 CpG sites evaluated by the assay. The analytical sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the assay were 89%, 100%, and 96%, respectively. Intra- and inter-assay precision was 100%. The limit of detection (LOD) was 1 in 400 methylated cells, and the reference range was 84%. In summary, EsoGuard demonstrates high analytical accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility in samples collected using the EsoCheck device. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate diagnosis of the stage of esophageal disorders is crucial in the treatment planning for patients with esophageal cancer and in improving the 5-year survival rate. The progression of esophageal cancer typically begins with precancerous esophageal disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophagitis, and non-dysplasia Barrett's esophagus, eventually advancing to low- and high-dysplasia Barrett's esophagus and ultimately to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The majority of prior research efforts have primarily focused on the identification of general gastrointestinal (GI) tract diseases and the detection of esophageal cancer, with limited attention to the diverse spectrum of esophageal disorders. To address this gap, an innovative framework called Hybrid Model-Based Esophageal Disorder Diagnosis (HMEDD) is developed in this work. The primary goal of HMEDD is to enable early diagnosis of various esophageal disorders using gastroscopic images. HMEDD combines the feature extraction capabilities of an Esophageal Convolutional Neural Network (EsoNet) with the high classification accuracy of a Refined Logistic Regression (RLR) model. EsoNet comprises 14 weight layers and kernels 3 × 3 used for high-level deep feature learning. Esophageal disorders are classified using the RLR model, which is developed by fine-tuning hyperparameters in the traditional Logistic Regression (LR) model using Random Search Cross-Validation (RandomizedSearchCV). HMEDD is extensively validated using a data set containing numerous esophageal abnormalities captured through gastroscopic images. The results of this work demonstrate the effectiveness of HMEDD in accurately classifying different esophageal disorders, with an impressive accuracy of 92.15%. These findings will assist physicians in the accurate early diagnosis of esophageal disorders, ultimately preventing their progression to cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Particulate matter exposure (PM) is a cause of aerodigestive disease globally. The destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) exposed first responders and inhabitants of New York City to WTC-PM and caused obstructive airways disease (OAD), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett's Esophagus (BE). GERD not only diminishes health-related quality of life but also gives rise to complications that extend beyond the scope of BE. GERD can incite or exacerbate allergies, sinusitis, bronchitis, and asthma. Disease features of the aerodigestive axis can overlap, often necessitating more invasive diagnostic testing and treatment modalities. This presents a need to develop novel non-invasive biomarkers of GERD, BE, airway hyperreactivity (AHR), treatment efficacy, and severity of symptoms. Methods: Our observational case-cohort study will leverage the longitudinally phenotyped Fire Department of New York (FDNY)-WTC exposed cohort to identify Biomarkers of Airway Disease, Barrett's and Underdiagnosed Reflux Noninvasively (BAD-BURN). Our study population consists of n = 4,192 individuals from which we have randomly selected a sub-cohort control group (n = 837). We will then recruit subgroups of i. AHR only ii. GERD only iii. BE iv. GERD/BE and AHR overlap or v. No GERD or AHR, from the sub-cohort control group. We will then phenotype and examine non-invasive biomarkers of these subgroups to identify under-diagnosis and/or treatment efficacy. The findings may further contribute to the development of future biologically plausible therapies, ultimately enhance patient care and quality of life. Discussion: Although many studies have suggested interdependence between airway and digestive diseases, the causative factors and specific mechanisms remain unclear. The detection of the disease is further complicated by the invasiveness of conventional GERD diagnosis procedures and the limited availability of disease-specific biomarkers. The management of reflux is important, as it directly increases risk of cancer and negatively impacts quality of life. Therefore, it is vital to develop novel noninvasive disease markers that can effectively phenotype, facilitate early diagnosis of premalignant disease and identify potential therapeutic targets to improve patient care. Trial registration: Name of Primary Registry: "Biomarkers of Airway Disease, Barrett's and Underdiagnosed Reflux Noninvasively (BADBURN)". Trial Identifying Number: NCT05216133. Date of Registration: January 31, 2022. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has surged by 600% in recent decades, with a dismal 5-year survival rate of just 15%. Barrett's esophagus (BE), affecting about 2% of the population, raises the risk of EAC by 40-fold. Despite this, the transcriptomic changes during the BE to EAC progression remain unclear. Our study addresses this gap through comprehensive transcriptomic profiling to identify key mRNA signatures and genomic alterations, such as gene fusions. We performed RNA-sequencing on BE and EAC tissues from 8 individuals, followed by differential gene expression, pathway and network analysis, and gene fusion prediction. We identified mRNA changes during the BE-to-EAC transition and validated our results with single-cell RNA-seq datasets. We observed upregulation of keratin family members in EAC and confirmed increased levels of keratin 14 (KRT14) using immunofluorescence. More differentiated BE marker genes are downregulated during progression to EAC, suggesting undifferentiated BE subpopulations contribute to EAC. We also identified several gene fusions absent in paired BE and normal esophagus but present in EAC. Our findings are critical for the BE-to-EAC transition and have the potential to promote early diagnosis, prevention, and improved treatment strategies for EAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past two decades, there has been a surge in the number of bariatric surgeries due to the increasing obesity epidemic. Currently, sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed bariatric surgery. One of the complications is reflux esophagitis. The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has increased over the last few decades, and it is now the most common chronic disease. GERD is defined by recurring and troublesome heartburn and regurgitation, as well as specific complications. It affects approximately 20% of the adult population in high-income countries. If the diagnosis is unclear, then endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and esophageal pH monitoring are recommended. Lifestyle changes, medications, and surgery are the main treatments for GERD. As a result, GERD can be categorized into three groups of patients: non-erosive reflux disease, erosive esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus. By dividing GERD into these three unique groups of patients, we can focus on the different mechanisms that lead to the development of each of these GERD-related disorders. This will help us concentrate on the specific therapeutic modalities that will benefit each group of patients. The objective of this review to determine the impact of reflux esophagitis and GERD after sleeve gastrectomy. The conclusions drawn from this review are: (1) the pathophysiology of GERD is multifactorial; (2) surgical therapy for GERD is the most appropriate treatment; and (3) the genesis of esophageal adenocarcinoma is associated with GERD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The z-line refers to the squamocolumnar junction which marks the transition between the normal stratified squamous epithelium of the distal esophagus and the columnar epithelium of the gastric cardia. An "irregular" z-line refers to an irregular appearing squamocolumnar junction characterized by the presence of columnar mucosa less than 1 cm in length that extends above the gastroesophageal junction. In contrast, Barrett's esophagus is diagnosed when columnar mucosa of at least 1 cm is seen in the distal esophagus extending above the gastroesophageal junction with biopsies demonstrating specialized intestinal metaplasia. Current guidelines recommend against taking routine biopsies from a normal or irregular z-line in the absence of visible abnormalities and advise against endoscopic surveillance in this patient population, in large part due to multiple studies demonstrating lack of progression to advanced neoplasia such as high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with an irregular z-line. Despite these recommendations, a sizable number of patients without Barrett's esophagus undergo biopsies from the z-line and are subsequently recommended to have surveillance endoscopies. Furthermore, patients with an irregular z-line are often mislabelled as Barrett's esophagus resulting in significant downstream consequences including higher healthcare costs and reduced health-related quality of life. In this review, we highlight the importance of landmark identification of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction at the time of endoscopy, share recommendations from current guidelines related to the z-line, examine rates of neoplastic progression in those with an irregular z-line, discuss consequences of routinely biopsying an irregular z-line, and highlight strategies on how to approach an irregular z-line if seen on endoscopy. A careful, high-quality endoscopic examination can help to identify visible abnormalities at the z-line, which, if present, should be targeted for biopsies to rule out dysplasia and neoplasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with dysphagia that is not explained by upper endoscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is the next logical step in diagnostic testing. This study investigated predictors of failure to refer for HRM after an upper endoscopy that was performed for but did not explain dysphagia. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients >18 years of age who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for dysphagia from 2015 to 2021. Patients with EGD findings that explained dysphagia (e.g. esophageal mass, eosinophilic esophagitis, Schatzki ring, etc.) were excluded from the main analyses. The primary outcome was failure to refer for HRM within 1 year of the index non-diagnostic EGD. We also investigated delayed referral for HRM, defined as HRM performed after the median. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to identify risk factors that independently predicted failure to refer for HRM, conditioned on the providing endoscopist. Among 2132 patients who underwent EGD for dysphagia, 1240 (58.2%) did not have findings to explain dysphagia on the index EGD. Of these 1240 patients, 148 (11.9%) underwent HRM within 1 year of index EGD. Endoscopic findings (e.g. hiatal hernia, tortuous esophagus, Barrett's esophagus, surgically altered anatomy not involving the gastroesophageal junction, and esophageal varices) perceived to explain dysphagia were independently associated with failure to refer for HRM (adjusted odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.25–0.80). Of the 148 patients who underwent HRM within 1 year of index EGD, 29.7% were diagnosed with a disorder of esophagogastric junction outflow, 17.6% with a disorder of peristalsis, and 2.0% with both disorders of esophagogastric outflow and peristalsis. The diagnosis made by HRM was similar among those who had incidental EGD findings that were non-diagnostic for dysphagia compared with those who had completely normal EGD findings. Demographic factors including race/ethnicity, insurance type, and income were not associated with failure to refer for HRM or delayed HRM. Patients with dysphagia and endoscopic findings unrelated to dysphagia have a similar prevalence of esophageal motility disorders to those with normal endoscopic examinations, yet these patients are less likely to undergo HRM. Provider education is indicated to increase HRM referral in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]