Search

Used alone or in combination, oral antidiabetic drugs target specific defects to reduce hyperglycemia and, sometimes, improve dyslipidemia. Together with insulin, some can prevent the weight gain and hypoglycemia associated with insulin monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To determine which dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived indices of fat mass distribution are the most informative to predict the various parameters of the metabolic syndrome. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 87 healthy men, 63 lean (% fat 26), underwent DXA scanning to evaluate body composition with respect to the whole body and the trunk, leg, and abdominal regions from Ll to L4 and from L3 to L4. These regions were correlated with insulin sensitivity determined by the euglycemichyperinsulinernic clamp, insulin area under the curve after oral glucose tolerance test (AUC I); triglyceride; total, HDL, and LDL cholesterol; free fatty acids; and blood pressure. The analyses were performed in all subjects, as well as in lean and obese groups separately. RESULTS: Among the various indices of body fat, DXA-determined adiposity in the abdominal cut at L1-4 level was the most predictive of the metabolic variables, showing significant relationships with glucose infusion rate ([GIR], mg x kg-1 lean body mass x min-1), triglyceride, and cholesterol, independent of total-body mass (r = -0.267, P < 0.05; r = 0.316, P < 0.005; and r = 0.319, P < 0.005, respectively). Upon subanalysis, these correlations remained significant in lean men, whereas in obese men, only BMI and the amount of leg fat (negative relationship) showed significant correlations with triglyceride and cholesterol (r = 0.438, P < 0.05; r = 0.458, P < 0.05; r = -0.439, P < 0.05; and r = -0.414, P < 0.05, respectively). The results of a multiple regression analysis revealed that 470/0 of the variance in GIR among all study subjects was predicted by AUC I, fat L1-4, diastolic blood pressure (dBP), HDL, and triglyceride as independent variables. In the lean group, fat L1-4 alone accounted for 33% of the variance of GIR, whereas in obese men, AUC I and dBP explained 68% of the variance in GIR. CONCLUSIONS: The DXA technique applied for the evaluation of fat distribution can provide useful information regarding various aspects of the insulin resistance syndrome in healthy subjects. DXA can be a valid, accurate, relatively inexpensive, and safer alternative compared with other methods to investigate the role of abdominal body fat distribution on cardiovascular risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Lenvatinib (dosing for patients who weigh ≥60 kg was 12 mg/day; for patients who weigh <60 kg, the dose was 8 mg/day) plus pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks demonstrated antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with first-line unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in the open-label phase 1b Study 116/KEYNOTE-524 (primary analysis data cutoff date: October 31, 2019; median follow-up: 10.6 months). This analysis (updated data cutoff date: March 31, 2021) reports efficacy results from 17 months of additional follow-up time., Methods: 100 patients with uHCC were included in the primary analysis (median follow-up: 27.6 months). Endpoints included overall survival (OS), investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) per modified RECIST. Landmark analyses of OS by the best response at 3 and 9 months were performed. Pembrolizumab antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and concentrations were also measured (cutoff date: August 7, 2020)., Results: ORR was 43.0% (95% CI 33.1-53.3%) and median DOR was 17.1 months (95% CI 6.9-19.3 months). Median PFS and OS were 9.3 months (95% CI 7.4-9.8 months) and 20.4 months (95% CI 14.4-25.9 months), respectively. No treatment-emergent ADAs were detected., Conclusion: Results show a sustained treatment effect with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with uHCC in the first-line setting., Competing Interests: Masatoshi Kudo: honoraria – Eli Lilly, Bayer, Eisai, Chugai, Takeda, and AstraZeneca; grant – Taiho, Otsuka, EA Pharma, AbbVie, Eisai, Chugai, and GE Healthcare; and advisory consulting – Chugai, Roche, Eisai, and AstraZeneca. Richard S. Finn: consulting or advisory role – Pfizer, Bayer, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Eisai, Lilly, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, and C Stone Pharma; research funding – Pfizer (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Merck (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), and Roche/Genentech (Inst); and expert testimony – Novartis. Masafumi Ikeda: honoraria – Abbott Japan, Bayer Yakuhin, Bristol Myers Squibb Japan, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Lilly Japan, Novartis, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, Yakult, Nihon Servier, AstraZeneca, MSD, Takeda, Astellas Pharma, AbbVie, Fujifilm Toyama Chemical, EA Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Incyte Biosciences Japan, and Taisho Pharmaceutical; consulting or advisory role – Eisai, Novartis, Lilly Japan, Chugai Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Nihon Servier, Takeda, and GlaxoSmithKline; and research funding – AstraZeneca (Inst), Bayer Yakuhin (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Chugai Pharma (Inst), Eisai, Lilly Japan (Inst), Merck Biopharma (Inst), Delta-Fly Pharma (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Yakult (Inst), MSD (Inst), J-Pharma (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Chiome Bioscience (Inst), Merus N.V. (Inst), Nihon Servier (Inst), and Syneos Health (Inst). Max W. Sung: honoraria – Genentech and Bayer. Ari D. Baron: speakers’ bureau – Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Lilly, Amgen, Eisai, Johnson & Johnson, and AbbVie. Takuji Okusaka: honoraria – Meiji Seika Kaisha, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Shire, AbbVie, Eisai, Ono Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Teijin Pharma, Lilly, Nippon Shinyaku, Servier, Novartis, Bayer, Pfizer, and Mundipharma; consulting or advisory role – Taiho Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Eisai; research funding – Novartis (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma (Inst), Baxter (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Chugai Pharma (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst); and travel, accommodations, and expenses – Takara Bio. Masahiro Kobayashi: honoraria – Eisai Japan. Hiromitsu Kumada: honoraria – Merck Sharp & Dohme, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, and Eisai. Shuichi Kaneko: honoraria – Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Lilly; consulting or advisory role – Bayer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Lilly, and Eisai; research funding – Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Chugai Pharma (Inst), and Eisai (Inst). Marc Pracht: consulting – BMS and Ipsen. Tim Meyer: consulting – Eisai, BMS, Adaptimmune, Ipsen, Roche, and AstraZeneca; grant funding – MSD. Satoshi Nagao, Kalgi Mody, and Zahra Ramji: employment – Eisai. Kenichi Saito: employment – Eisai; and patents, royalties, and other intellectual property – applying for patent for pharmaceutical composition. Leonid Dubrovsky: employment – Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. Josep M. Llovet: research support – Eisai, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Ipsen; and consultancy – Eisai, Merck, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celsion Corporation, Eli Lilly, Roche, Genentech, Ipsen, Glycotest, Nucleix, Biopharma, Sirtex, and AstraZeneca., (© 2023 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Aims: Advanced practice providers (APPs) play a vital role in monitoring for and managing adverse reactions (ARs). As lenvatinib ARs can resemble cirrhosis (commonly presenting with hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]), APP input is important for timely detection and management of ARs and to promote medication adherence., Design: The goal of this post-hoc analysis of the REFLECT trial was to characterize key ARs associated with lenvatinib, and to discuss management strategies., Methods: In REFLECT, patients with unresectable HCC were randomized to either daily lenvatinib (12 mg/day for patients who weighed ≥ 60 kg or 8 mg/day for those < 60 kg) or sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. Adverse events in the lenvatinib arm were grouped into ARs (hypertension, fatigue, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, proteinuria, and decreased appetite) per the United States Prescribing Information (USPI) for lenvatinib., Results: Key ARs in the lenvatinib arm ( n = 476) generally occurred within months of starting lenvatinib. Some cases of proteinuria, decreased appetite, and diarrhea were first reported at about 2 years of treatment., Conclusions: The onset of key ARs associated with lenvatinib treatment can be predicted and generally be managed (per the lenvatinib USPI and REFLECT) by withholding lenvatinib and resuming it at a reduced dose after the severity decreases. However, lenvatinib should generally be discontinued if the AR is life-threatening., Competing Interests: This study was sponsored by Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA, and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. Medical writing support was provided by Michael Venditto, PharmD, of Oxford PharmaGenesis Inc., Newtown, PA, USA, and was funded by Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA, and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. Ms. Jones and Ms. Degregorio have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Dr. Sung has served a consulting or advisory role for Bayer, Eisai, Exelixis, and Genentech. Ms. Ramji and Dr. Ren are employees of Eisai Inc. Dr. Baron has served on the speakers bureau for Lilly, Amgen, Eisai, Johnson & Johnson, AbbVie, Merck, and Bristol Myers Squibb., (© 2023 BroadcastMed LLC.)

Background: The CELESTIAL trial (NCT01908426) demonstrated overall survival benefit for cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who had received prior sorafenib treatment. This analysis of CELESTIAL compared the impact of cabozantinib versus placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQoL)., Materials and Methods: Health status was assessed using the EuroQol five-dimension five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire over the 800-day follow-up period. EQ-5D-5L health states were mapped to health utility scores using reference values for the UK population. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated for each treatment group as the area under the curve for the plot of health utility score over time. The between-treatment group difference in restricted mean QALYs was calculated by generalized linear models and adjusted for baseline differences. A difference of 0.08 in health utility score (or in QALY) was deemed a minimally important difference and to be clinically significant., Results: At week 5, the difference in mean health utility score between cabozantinib and placebo was -0.097 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.126, -0.067; p ≤ 0.001). Between-group differences in health utility scores diminished over time and were generally non-significant. The cabozantinib group accrued more QALYs than the placebo group over follow-up. Differences in mean QALYs (cabozantinib minus placebo) were statistically and clinically significant, ranging from +0.092 (95% CI: 0.016, 0.169) to +0.185 (95% CI: 0.126, 0.243) in favour of cabozantinib, depending on the reference value set used., Conclusions: These HRQoL findings support a positive benefit-risk profile for cabozantinib in previously treated patients with aHCC., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: In REFLECT, lenvatinib demonstrated an effect on overall survival (OS) by confirmation of noninferiority to sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This analysis assessed correlations between serum or tissue biomarkers and efficacy outcomes from REFLECT., Experimental Design: Serum biomarkers (VEGF, ANG2, FGF19, FGF21, and FGF23) were measured by ELISA. Gene expression in tumor tissues was measured by the nCounter PanCancer Pathways Panel. Pharmacodynamic changes in serum biomarker levels from baseline, and associations of clinical outcomes with baseline biomarker levels, were evaluated., Results: Four hundred and seven patients were included in the serum analysis set (lenvatinib n = 279, sorafenib n = 128); 58 patients were included in the gene-expression analysis set (lenvatinib n = 34, sorafenib n = 24). Both treatments were associated with increases in VEGF; only lenvatinib was associated with increases in FGF19 and FGF23 at all time points. Lenvatinib-treated responders had greater increases in FGF19 and FGF23 versus nonresponders at cycle 4, day 1 (FGF19: 55.2% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.014; FGF23: 48.4% vs. 16.4%, P = 0.0022, respectively). Higher baseline VEGF, ANG2, and FGF21 correlated with shorter OS in both treatment groups. OS was longer for lenvatinib than sorafenib [median, 10.9 vs. 6.8 months, respectively; HR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.85; P- interaction = 0.0397] with higher baseline FGF21. In tumor tissue biomarker analysis, VEGF/FGF-enriched groups showed improved OS with lenvatinib versus the intermediate VEGF/FGF group (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.91; P = 0.0253)., Conclusions: Higher baseline levels of VEGF, FGF21, and ANG2 may be prognostic for shorter OS. Higher baseline FGF21 may be predictive for longer OS with lenvatinib compared with sorafenib, but this needs confirmation., (©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: The immunomodulatory effect of lenvatinib (a multikinase inhibitor) on tumor microenvironments may contribute to antitumor activity when combined with programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) signaling inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We report results from a phase Ib study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) in unresectable HCC (uHCC)., Patients and Methods: In this open-label multicenter study, patients with uHCC received lenvatinib (bodyweight ≥ 60 kg, 12 mg; < 60 kg, 8 mg) orally daily and pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The study included a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) phase and an expansion phase (first-line patients). Primary objectives were safety/tolerability (DLT phase), and objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by modified RECIST (mRECIST) and RECIST version 1.1 (v1.1) per independent imaging review (IIR; expansion phase)., Results: A total of 104 patients were enrolled. No DLTs were reported (n = 6) in the DLT phase; 100 patients (expansion phase; included n = 2 from DLT phase) had received no prior systemic therapy and had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B (n = 29) or C disease (n = 71). At data cutoff, 37% of patients remained on treatment. Median duration of follow-up was 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 11.5 months). Confirmed ORRs by IIR were 46.0% (95% CI, 36.0% to 56.3%) per mRECIST and 36.0% (95% CI, 26.6% to 46.2%) per RECIST v1.1. Median DORs by IIR were 8.6 months (95% CI, 6.9 months to not estimable [NE]) per mRECIST and 12.6 months (95% CI, 6.9 months to NE) per RECIST v1.1. Median progression-free survival by IIR was 9.3 months per mRECIST and 8.6 months per RECIST v1.1. Median overall survival was 22 months. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 67% (grade 5, 3%) of patients. No new safety signals were identified., Conclusion: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab has promising antitumor activity in uHCC. Toxicities were manageable, with no unexpected safety signals.

Objective: In the phase 3 CELESTIAL trial, cabozantinib improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This subgroup analysis evaluated cabozantinib in patients who had received sorafenib as the only prior systemic therapy., Methods: CELESTIAL randomised (2:1) patients with advanced HCC and Child-Pugh class A liver function to treatment with cabozantinib (60 mg daily) or placebo. Eligibility required prior treatment with sorafenib, and patients could have received ≤2 prior systemic regimens. The primary endpoint was OS. Outcomes in patients who had received sorafenib as the only prior therapy were analysed by duration of prior sorafenib (<3 months, 3 to <6 months and ≥6 months)., Results: Of patients who had received only prior sorafenib, 331 were randomised to cabozantinib and 164 to placebo; 136 patients had received sorafenib for <3 months, 141 for 3 to <6 months and 217 for ≥6 months. Cabozantinib improved OS relative to placebo in the overall second-line population who had received only prior sorafenib (median 11.3 vs 7.2 months; HR=0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.88). This improvement was maintained in analyses by prior sorafenib duration with longer duration generally corresponding to longer median OS-median OS 8.9 vs 6.9 months (HR=0.72, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.10) for prior sorafenib <3 months, 11.5 vs 6.5 months (HR=0.65, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.00) for 3 to <6 months and 12.3 vs 9.2 months (HR=0.82, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.16) for ≥6 months. Cabozantinib also improved PFS in all duration subgroups. Safety data were consistent with the overall study population., Conclusion: Cabozantinib improved efficacy outcomes versus placebo in the second-line population who had received only prior sorafenib irrespective of duration of prior sorafenib treatment, further supporting the utility of cabozantinib in the evolving treatment landscape of HCC., Clinical Trial Number: NCT01908426., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RKK: consulting or advisory role—Agios (Inst); AstraZeneca (Inst); Bayer (Inst); Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst); Genentech/Roche; Gilead; Target Pharmasolutions; Target Pharmasolutions (Inst); research funding—Adaptimmune (Inst); Agios (Inst); AstraZeneca (Inst); Bayer (Inst); Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst); Celgene (Inst); EMD Serono (Inst); Exelixis (Inst); Lilly (Inst); MedImmune (Inst); Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst); Novartis (Inst); Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst); PM: consulting or advisory role—Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; MSD; Onxeo; Roche. LB: honoraria—Bayer; Bracco Diagnostics; Brystol-Myers-Squibb; Guerbet; Lilly; Meda Pharmaceuticals; Sirtex Medical; consulting or advisory role—Bayer; Brystol-Myers-Squibb; Guerbet; Sirtex medical speakers' bureau—Bayer; Bracco Diagnostics; Brystol-Myers-Squibb; Guerbet; Lilly; Meda Pharmaceuticals; Sirtex Medical; research funding—ArQule; Bayer; Brystol-Myers-Squibb; Daiichi Synkyo; travel, accommodations, expenses—Bayer; Bracco Diagnostics; Guerbet; Lilly. SLC: grants—Merck Sharp & Dohme (Asia) Ltd; personal fees—AstraZeneca Hong Kong Limited, Bayer HealthCare Limited. ADB: speakers' bureau—Amgen; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Genentech/Roche; Lilly; Merck. JK: honoraria—Novartis; consulting or advisory role—Lilly; Merck; research funding— AstraZeneca; Merck. SC: personal fees—Ipsen. TY: personal fees—BMS, MSD, Ipsen, Exelxis, Eisai, Bayer; grants and personal fees—BMS; personal fees—MSD, Ipsen, Exelixis, Bayer. JCL: employment and stock holdings—Exelixis, Inc. SM: employment—Exelixis, Inc; stock holdings—Amgen; Exelixis; FibroGen; GlaxoSmithKline. ABE-K: honoraria—AstraZeneca; Bayer; Brystol-Myers-Squibb; Genentech; GlaxoSmithKline; consulting or advisory role—AstraZeneca; Brystol-Myers-Squibb; Genentech/Roche; speakers' bureau—Merrimack; research funding—Astex Pharmaceuticals; travel, accommodations, expenses—AstraZeneca; Bayer; Brystol-Myers-Squibb; Genentech; GlaxoSmithKline. A-LC: personal fees (advisory board, honoraria, travel expenses)—Ono Pharmaceutical; Exelixis; Nucleix Ltd.; Roche/Genentech; IQVIA; Merck Sharp Dohme; Bayer Yakuhin; Amgen Taiwan; Ispen; advisor/board member—Bayer Schering Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eisai; Merck Serono; Novartis. TM: consulting or advisory role—Beigene; Bristol-Myers Squibb; BTG; Eisai; Ipsen; MSD; Tarveda Therapeutics; research funding—Bayer (Inst); BTG (Inst); Ipsen (Inst). GKA-A: grants and personal fees—Bayer, Exelixis, BMS, Eisai, Lilly, Merck; patent: Articles and methods for preventing and treating dermatologic adverse events, identified by International Patent Application No PCT/US2014/031545 filed on 24 March 2014, and priority application serial no: 61/804,907; filed: 25 March 2013 issued. All other authors report no conflicts of interest., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Background: The rationale for the evaluation of trametinib in advanced biliary cancer (BC) is based on the presence of mitogen-activated protein kinase alterations and on earlier promising results with MEK inhibitors in BC., Methods: Patients with histologically proven BC who progressed on gemcitabine/platinum were randomised to trametinib daily (arm 1) versus fluoropyrimidine therapy (infusional 5-fluorouracil or oral capecitabine, arm 2). The primary end-point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end-points included progression free survival (PFS) and response rate. A planned interim futility analysis of objective response was performed on the first 14 patients registered to the trametinib arm., Results: The study was stopped early based on the lack of measurable response in the trametinib arm. A total of 44 eligible patients were randomised (24 patients in arm 1 and 20 patients in arm 2). Median age was 62 years and the primary sites of tumour were cholangiocarcinoma (68%) and gallbladder (32%). The overall response rate was 8% (95% CI 0%-19%) in arm 1 versus 10% (95% CI 0%-23%) in arm 2 (p > .99) Median OS was 4.3 months for arm 1 and 6.6 months for arm 2. The median PFS was 1.4 months for arm 1 and 3.3 months for arm 2., Conclusions: This is the first prospective randomised study of a targeted agent versus chemotherapy for the second-line treatment of BC. In this unselected population, the interim analysis result of unlikely benefit with trametinib resulted in early closure., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 1 (STEAP1) is highly expressed in prostate cancers. DSTP3086S is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 anti-STEAP1 monoclonal antibody linked to the potent antimitotic agent monomethyl auristatin E. This study evaluated the safety and activity of DSTP3086S in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer., Methods: Patients were enrolled in a 3 + 3 dose escalation study to evaluate DSTP3086S (0.3 to 2.8 mg/kg intravenously) given once every 3 weeks followed by cohort expansion at the recommended phase II dose or weekly (0.8 to 1.0 mg/kg)., Results: Seventy-seven patients were given DSTP3086S once every 3 weeks, and seven were treated weekly. Two patients in the once-every-3-weeks dose escalation had dose-limiting grade 3 transaminitis. Grade 3 hyperglycemia and grade 4 hypophosphatemia were dose-limiting toxicities in one patient treated at 1.0 mg/kg weekly. Initial cohort expansion evaluated dosing at 2.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (n = 10), but frequent dose reductions led to testing of 2.4 mg/kg (n = 39) in the expansion phase. Common related adverse events (> 20%) across doses (once every 3 weeks) were fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, nausea, constipation, anorexia, diarrhea, and vomiting. DSTP3086S pharmacokinetics were linear. Among 62 patients who received > 2 mg/kg DSTP3086S once every 3 weeks, 11 (18%) demonstrated a ≥ 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen; two (6%) of 36 with measurable disease at baseline achieved a radiographic partial response; and of 27 patients with informative unfavorable baseline circulating tumor cells ≥ 5/7.5 mL of blood, 16 (59%) showed conversions to favorable circulating tumor cells < 5. No prostate-specific antigen or RECIST responses were seen with weekly dosing., Conclusion: DSTP3086S has acceptable safety at the recommended phase II dose level of 2.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. Antitumor activity at doses between 2.25 and 2.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks supports the potential benefit of treating STEAP1-expressing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with an STEAP1-targeting antibody-drug conjugate.

Background: Ramucirumab, the human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody receptor antagonist of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, has been approved for treating gastric/gastroesophageal junction, non-small-cell lung, and metastatic colorectal cancers. With the completion of six global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trials across multiple tumor types, an opportunity now exists to further establish the safety parameters of ramucirumab across a large patient population., Materials and Methods: An individual patient meta-analysis across the six completed phase III trials was conducted and the relative risk (RR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived using fixed-effects or mixed-effects models for all-grade and high-grade adverse events (AEs) possibly related to vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibition. The number needed to harm was also calculable due to the placebo-controlled nature of all six registration standard trials., Results: A total of 4996 treated patients (N = 2748 in the ramucirumab arm and N = 2248 in the control, placebo arm) were included in this meta-analysis. Arterial thromboembolic events [ATE; all-grade, RR: 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.3; high-grade (grade ≥3), RR: 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.7], venous thromboembolic events (VTE; all-grade, RR: 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.1; high-grade, RR: 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.2), high-grade bleeding (RR: 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.5), and high-grade gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (RR: 1.1, 95% CI 0.7-1.7) did not demonstrate a definite increased risk with ramucirumab. A higher percentage of hypertension, proteinuria, low-grade (grade 1-2) bleeding, GI perforation, infusion-related reaction, and wound-healing complications were observed in the ramucirumab arm compared with the control arm., Conclusions: Ramucirumab may be distinct among antiangiogenic agents in terms of ATE, VTE, high-grade bleeding, or high-grade GI bleeding by showing no clear evidence for an increased risk of these AEs in this meta-analysis of a large and diverse patient population. Ramucirumab is consistent with other angiogenic inhibitors in the risk of developing certain AEs. Clinical Trial Numbers: NCT00917384 (REGARD), NCT01170663 (RAINBOW), NCT01168973 (REVEL), NCT01183780 (RAISE), NCT01140347 (REACH), and NCT00703326 (ROSE)., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) incidence is increasing in the USA. Gemcitabine (G) and oxaliplatin (O) are active in HCC and biliary duct cancer (BDC). Erlotinib (E) is an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with known activity against both. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of the combination G+O+E. Patients with either of the two diagnosis were treated in a phase II trial. Simons 2 stage design was used. A disease-control rate (DCR), complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)+ stable disease (SD) at 24 weeks of ≤20% and >40% (P0 and P1 of 0.2 and 0.4, respectively) were set as undesirable (null) and desirable results. 26 HCC and 7 BDC patients were accrued. In HCC, 1 PR, 10 SD, and 9 PDs were seen. DCR in HCC was 42%. Among seven (7) patients with BDC, one patient was not evaluable; one achieved a long lasting PR, and five patients had SD and DCR was 86%. Median overall survival (OS) times and progression-free survivals (PFS) were 196 and 149 days in HCC and 238 days and not reached in BDC. PFS at 26 weeks in HCC was 41% and at 21 weeks in BDC was 60%. Grade 3 toxicities in >5% of patients were fatigue (12.9%), neutropenia (9.6%), thrombocytopenia (9.6%), and diarrhea (6.4%). G+O+E exceeded both preset P0a and P1 of the primary objective with a PFS of 41% at 26 weeks for HCC and preliminary BDC data may warrant further investigations., (© 2017 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To report patient-focused outcomes as measured by quality of life (QoL) and performance status (PS) in REACH, a phase III placebo-controlled randomised study, assessing ramucirumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who received prior sorafenib., Methods: Eligible patients had advanced HCC, Child-Pugh A, PS 0 or 1 and prior sorafenib. Patients received ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo (1:1) on day 1 of a 2-week cycle. QoL was assessed by FACT Hepatobiliary Symptom Index (FHSI)-8 and EuroQoL (EQ-5D) at baseline; cycles 4, 10, and 16; and end of treatment. PS was assessed at baseline, each cycle, and end of treatment. Deterioration in FHSI-8 was defined as a ≥3-point decrease from baseline and PS deterioration was defined as a change of ≥2. Both intention-to-treat and pre-specified subgroup of patients with baseline serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/mL were assessed., Results: There were 565 patients randomised to ramucirumab and placebo. Compliance with FHSI and EQ-5D was high and similar between groups. In the ITT population, deterioration in FHSI-8, EQ-5D, and PS was similar between ramucirumab and placebo. In patients with baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL, ramucirumab significantly reduced deterioration in FHSI-8 at the end of treatment compared with placebo (P = 0.0381), and there was a trend towards a delay in the deterioration of symptoms in FHSI-8 (HR 0.690; P = 0.054) and PS (HR 0.642; P = 0.057) in favour of ramucirumab., Conclusions: We report one of the most comprehensive data sets of QoL and symptom burden in patients undergoing systemic therapy for advanced HCC. Ramucirumab was associated with no worsening of QoL. In patients with baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL, the significant survival benefit observed in patients treated with ramucirumab was coupled with a trend in patient-focused outcome benefits., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01140347., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Importance: REACH is the first phase 3 trial to provide information on hepatocellular cancer (HCC) in the second-line (postsorafenib) setting categorized by Child-Pugh score, a scoring system used to measure the severity of chronic liver disease. This exploratory analysis demonstrates the relationship between a potential ramucirumab survival benefit, severity of liver disease, and baseline α-fetoprotein (αFP)., Objective: To assess treatment effects and tolerability of ramucirumab by Child-Pugh score in patients with HCC enrolled in the REACH trial., Design, Settings, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial of ramucirumab and best supportive care vs placebo and best supportive care as second-line treatment in patients with HCC enrolled between November 4, 2010 and April 18, 2013, from 154 global sites. Overall, 643 patients were randomized and included in this analysis; 565 patients considered Child-Pugh class A (Child-Pugh scores 5 and 6) and 78 patients considered class B (Child-Pugh scores 7 and 8)., Interventions: Ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo intravenously plus best supportive care every 2 weeks., Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival (OS), defined as time from randomization to death from any cause., Results: In the randomized population of 643 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [11.1] years) in this analysis, a potential ramucirumab OS benefit was observed for patients with a Child-Pugh score of 5 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63-1.02; P = .06) but no apparent benefit for patients with Child-Pugh scores of 6 or 7 and 8. In patients with baseline αFP levels of 400 ng/mL (to convert ng/mL to μg/L, multiply by 1.0) or more, a ramucirumab OS benefit was significant for a score of Child-Pugh 5 (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.87; P = .01) and Child-Pugh 6 (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98; P = .04), but was not significant for Child-Pugh 7 and 8. The overall safety profile of ramucirumab, regardless of Child-Pugh score, was considered manageable. Regardless of treatment arm, patients with Child-Pugh scores of 7 and 8 experienced a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events, including ascites and asthenia, and special-interest events, including liver injury and/or failure and bleeding, compared with patients with Child-Pugh scores of 5 or 6., Conclusions and Relevance: In unselected patients, a trend for ramucirumab survival benefit was observed only for patients with a Child-Pugh score of 5. In patients with baseline αFP levels of 400 ng/mL or more, a ramucirumab survival benefit was observed for Child-Pugh scores of 5 and 6. Ramucirumab had a manageable toxic effect profile. These results support the ongoing REACH-2 study of ramucirumab in patients with advanced HCC with underlying Child-Pugh A cirrhosis and baseline αFP levels of 400 ng/mL or more., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01140347.

Computed Tomography (CT) and Echocardiography (EC) are two imaging modalities that produce critical longitudinal data that can be analyzed for radiation-induced organ-specific injury to the lung and heart. The Medical Countermeasures Against Radiological Threats (MCART) consortium has a well established animal model research platform that includes nonhuman primate (NHP) models of the acute radiation syndrome and the delayed effects of acute radiation exposure. These models call for a definition of the latency, incidence, severity, duration, and resolution of different organ-specific radiation-induced subsyndromes. The pulmonary subsyndromes and cardiac effects are a pair of interdependent syndromes impacted by exposure to potentially lethal doses of radiation. Establishing a connection between these will reveal important information about their interaction and progression of injury and recovery. Herein, the authors demonstrate the use of CT and EC data in the rhesus macaque models to define delayed organ injury, thereby establishing: a) consistent and reliable methodology to assess radiation-induced damage to the lung and heart; b) an extensive database in normal age-matched NHP for key primary and secondary endpoints; c) identified problematic variables in imaging techniques and proposed solutions to maintain data integrity; and d) initiated longitudinal analysis of potentially lethal radiation-induced damage to the lung and heart.

Background: VEGF and VEGF receptor-2-mediated angiogenesis contribute to hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis. Ramucirumab is a recombinant IgG1 monoclonal antibody and VEGF receptor-2 antagonist. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib., Methods: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial (REACH), patients were enrolled from 154 centres in 27 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had hepatocellular carcinoma with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C disease or stage B disease that was refractory or not amenable to locoregional therapy, had Child-Pugh A liver disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, had previously received sorafenib (stopped because of progression or intolerance), and had adequate haematological and biochemical parameters. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo every 2 weeks, plus best supportive care, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Randomisation was stratified by geographic region and cause of liver disease with a stratified permuted block method. Patients, medical staff, investigators, and the funder were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01140347., Findings: Between Nov 4, 2010, and April 18, 2013, 565 patients were enrolled, of whom 283 were assigned to ramucirumab and 282 were assigned to placebo. Median overall survival for the ramucirumab group was 9·2 months (95% CI 8·0-10·6) versus 7·6 months (6·0-9·3) for the placebo group (HR 0·87 [95% CI 0·72-1·05]; p=0·14). Grade 3 or greater adverse events occurring in 5% or more of patients in either treatment group were ascites (13 [5%] of 277 patients treated with ramucirumab vs 11 [4%] of 276 patients treated with placebo), hypertension (34 [12%] vs ten [4%]), asthenia (14 [5%] vs five [2%]), malignant neoplasm progression (18 [6%] vs 11 [4%]), increased aspartate aminotransferase concentration (15 [5%] vs 23 [8%]), thrombocytopenia (13 [5%] vs one [<1%]), hyperbilirubinaemia (three [1%] vs 13 [5%]), and increased blood bilirubin (five [2%] vs 14 [5%]). The most frequently reported (≥1%) treatment-emergent serious adverse event of any grade or grade 3 or more was malignant neoplasm progression., Interpretation: Second-line treatment with ramucirumab did not significantly improve survival over placebo in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. No new safety signals were noted in eligible patients and the safety profile is manageable., Funding: Eli Lilly and Co., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Insulin resistance is typically defined as a reduced ability of insulin to induce glucose uptake by target tissues such as fat and skeletal muscle cells. It accompanies several disease states, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, hepatitis C, and polycystic ovary syndrome, and is a primary feature of metabolic syndrome. Outside of its effects on blood glucose levels, insulin resistance is also associated with a 2- to 3-fold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. In 1996, Alain Baron, Helmut Steinberg, and colleagues demonstrated that insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction. This seminal observation led to significant advances in our understanding of insulin's action in health and disease.

Background: Activation of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors improves insulin sensitivity and induces vasodilatation and diuresis. AC3174 is a peptide analogue with pharmacologic properties similar to the GLP-1 receptor agonist, exenatide. Hypothetically, chronic AC3174 treatment could attenuate salt-induced hypertension, cardiac morbidity, insulin resistance, and renal dysfunction in Dahl salt-sensitive (DSS) rats., Methods: DSS rats were fed low salt (LS, 0.3% NaCl) or high salt (HS, 8% NaCl) diets. HS rats were treated with vehicle, AC3174 (1.7 pmol/kg/min), or GLP-1 (25 pmol/kg/min) for 4 weeks via subcutaneous infusion. Other HS rats received captopril (150 mg/kg/day) or AC3174 plus captopril., Results: HS rat survival was improved by all treatments except GLP-1. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was lower in LS rats and in GLP-1, AC3174, captopril, or AC3174 plus captopril HS rats than in vehicle HS rats (p < 0.05). AC3174 plus captopril attenuated the deleterious effects of high salt on posterior wall thickness, LV mass, and the ratio of LV mass to body weight (P < or = 0.05). In contrast, GLP-1 had no effect on these cardiovascular parameters. All treatments reduced LV wall stress. GLP-1, AC3174, captopril, or AC3174 plus captopril normalized fasting insulin and HOMA-IR (P < or = 0.05). AC3174, captopril, or AC3174 plus captopril improved renal function (P < or = 0.05). Renal morphology in HS rats was associated with extensive sclerosis. Monotherapy with AC3174, captopril, or GLP-1 attenuated renal damage. However, AC3174 plus captopril produced the most effective improvement., Conclusions: Thus, AC3174 had antihypertensive, cardioprotective, insulin-sensitizing, and renoprotective effects in the DSS hypertensive rat model. Furthermore, AC3174 improved animal survival, an effect not observed with GLP-1.

Background: Drug resistance mechanisms can reduce response rate and duration in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) receiving docetaxel-based therapy. Patupilone (epothilone B), a microtubule-targeting agent, may be unaffected by some resistance mechanisms. Therefore, a phase II study assessed the patupilone safety and activity in CRPC patients with and without previous chemotherapy., Methods: CRPC patients received patupilone 2.5 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle. Patients were required to have measurable disease or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (levels>20 ng/ml)., Results: All 45 enrolled patients (median age, 69 years) were safety and response assessable. Sixty-four percent had previous chemotherapy (55% had previous taxane therapy). Patients received a median of three patupilone cycles. Patupilone was generally well tolerated. Ten (22%) patients experienced grade 3 diarrhea, six (13%) grade 3 fatigue, and one (2%) grade 3 neuropathy with no neutropenia or thrombocytopenia incidence. Six (13%) patients had >or= 50% decline in PSA (three had previous taxane therapy). No patient with measurable disease had a response. Median overall survival was 13.4 months., Conclusions: The safety profile of weekly patupilone in CRPC patients compares favorably with that of other microtubule inhibitors. At the dose and schedule tested, patupilone demonstrated minimal activity in CRPC.

Introduction: Diabetes is associated with a high incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED) and poor response to standard treatments. Oxidative stress could be relevant in the pathophysiology of diabetic ED., Aim: To evaluate the effects of the antioxidant, AC3056 (2,6-di-t-butyl-4-((dimethyl-4-methoxyphenylsilyl)methyloxy)phenol), on diabetic ED., Methods: Erectile responses to cavernosal nerve electrical stimulation were determined in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Relaxation of human corpus cavernosal (HCC) tissue and penile resistance arteries (HPRA) from human cavernosal specimens was evaluated in organ chambers and myographs, respectively., Main Outcome Measures: The influence of AC3056 on erectile responses, lipid peroxidation, and nitrite plus nitrate serum content, and nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) expression in penile tissue, in diabetic rats, and on endothelium-dependent and neurogenic relaxation of HCC and HPRA from diabetic patients was determined., Results: Eight weeks of diabetes caused ED in rats that was prevented by oral AC3056 (0.3% w/w in rat chow) when given from the induction of diabetes. AC3056 also prevented the diabetes-induced elevation of serum thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS), the reduction of serum nitric oxide (NO) derivatives, and the increase of NF-kappaB expression. Acute oral administration of AC3056 (450 mg/kg) partially reversed ED in 8-week diabetic rats. Complete reversion of ED was achieved after 3 days of treatment with 0.3% AC3056. This effect remained after 5 weeks of treatment, but it disappeared after withdrawing for 1 week. Erectile function in diabetic rats was inversely related to serum TBARS. AC3056- (30 microM) reversed endothelial dysfunction in diabetic HCC and enhanced endothelium-dependent relaxation in diabetic HPRA and significantly potentiated neurogenic relaxation of both tissues. The reduced cGMP content in HCC from diabetic patients after exposure to acetylcholine (10 microM) was corrected by AC3056 (30 microM)., Conclusions: These results suggest that oxidative stress has a relevant role in pathophysiology of diabetic ED and provide a rationale for the use of antioxidant therapy in the treatment of ED in diabetes.

Purpose: Thalidomide and its more potent immunomodulatory derivative lenalidomide enhance rituximab-mediated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. We therefore evaluated lenalidomide and rituximab in symptomatic Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) patients naive to either agent., Experimental Design: Intended therapy consisted of 48 weeks of lenalidomide (25 mg/d for 3 weeks and then 1 week off) along with rituximab (375 mg/m(2)/wk) dosed on weeks 2 to 5 and 13 to 16. Sixteen patients were enrolled, 12 of whom were previously untreated., Results: Unexpectedly, we observed an acute decrease in hematocrit in 13 of 16 patients (median hematocrit decrease, 4.8%), which was attributable to lenalidomide patients and which led to cessation of further enrollment on this study. Lenalidomide-related anemia was observed even at doses as low as 5 mg/d and occurred in the absence of hemolysis or other cytopenias. The overall response and major response (<50% decrease in serum IgM) rates were 50% and 25%, respectively, on an intent-to-treat basis. With a median follow-up of 31.3 months, 4 of 8 responding patients have progressed with a median time to progression of 18.9 months., Conclusion: Lenalidomide produces unexpected but clinically significant acute anemia in patients with WM. In comparison with our previous study with thalidomide and rituximab in an analogous patient population, the responses achieved in WM patients with lenalidomide and rituximab appear less favorable.

Endogenous endothelin action is augmented in human obesity and type 2 diabetes and contributes to endothelial dysfunction and impairs insulin-mediated vasodilation in humans. We hypothesized that insulin resistance-associated hyperinsulinemia could preferentially drive endothelin-mediated vasoconstriction. We applied hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps with higher insulin dosing in obese subjects than lean subjects (30 vs. 10 mU.m(-2).min(-1), respectively), with the goal of matching insulin's nitric oxide (NO)-mediated vascular effects. We predicted that, under these circumstances, insulin-stimulated endothelin-1 (ET-1) action (assessed with the type A endothelin receptor antagonist BQ-123) would be augmented in proportion to hyperinsulinemia. NO bioactivity was assessed using the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-l-arginine. Insulin-mediated vasodilation and insulin-stimulated NO bioavailability were well matched across groups by this approach. As expected, steady-state insulin levels were approximately threefold higher in obese than lean subjects (109.2 +/- 10.2 pmol/l vs. 518.4 +/- 84.0, P = 0.03). Despite this, the augmentation of insulin-mediated vasodilation by BQ-123 was not different between groups. ET-1 flux across the leg was not augmented by insulin alone but was increased with the addition of BQ-123 to insulin (P = 0.01 BQ-123 effect, P = not significant comparing groups). Endothelin antagonism augmented insulin-stimulated NO bioavailability and NOx flux, but not differently between groups and not proportional to hyperinsulinemia. These findings do not support the hypothesis that insulin resistance-associated hyperinsulinemia preferentially drives endothelin-mediated vasoconstriction.

Previously, we reported that combination treatment with rat amylin (100 microg/kg.d) and murine leptin (500 microg/kg.d) elicited greater inhibition of food intake and greater body weight loss in diet-induced obese rats than predicted by the sum of the monotherapy conditions, a finding consistent with amylin-induced restoration of leptin responsiveness. In the present study, a 3 x 4 factorial design was used to formally test for a synergistic interaction, using lower dose ranges of amylin (0, 10, and 50 microg/kg.d) and leptin (0, 5, 25, and 125 microg/kg.d), on food intake and body weight after 4 wk continuous infusion. Response surface methodology analysis revealed significant synergistic anorexigenic (P < 0.05) and body weight-lowering (P < 0.05) effects of amylin/leptin combination treatment, with up to 15% weight loss at doses considerably lower than previously reported. Pair-feeding (PF) experiments demonstrated that reduction of food intake was the predominant mechanism for amylin/leptin-mediated weight loss. However, fat loss was 2-fold greater in amylin/leptin-treated rats than PF controls. Furthermore, amylin/leptin-mediated weight loss was not accompanied by the counterregulatory decrease in energy expenditure and chronic shift toward carbohydrate (rather than fat) utilization observed with PF. Hepatic gene expression analyses revealed that 28 d treatment with amylin/leptin (but not PF) was associated with reduced expression of genes involved in hepatic lipogenesis (Scd1 and Fasn mRNA) and increased expression of genes involved in lipid utilization (Pck1 mRNA). We conclude that amylin/leptin interact synergistically to reduce body weight and adiposity in diet-induced obese rodents through a number of anorexigenic and metabolic effects.

Body weight is regulated by complex neurohormonal interactions between endocrine signals of long-term adiposity (e.g., leptin, a hypothalamic signal) and short-term satiety (e.g., amylin, a hindbrain signal). We report that concurrent peripheral administration of amylin and leptin elicits synergistic, fat-specific weight loss in leptin-resistant, diet-induced obese rats. Weight loss synergy was specific to amylin treatment, compared with other anorexigenic peptides, and dissociable from amylin's effect on food intake. The addition of leptin after amylin pretreatment elicited further weight loss, compared with either monotherapy condition. In a 24-week randomized, double-blind, clinical proof-of-concept study in overweight/obese subjects, coadministration of recombinant human leptin and the amylin analog pramlintide elicited 12.7% mean weight loss, significantly more than was observed with either treatment alone (P < 0.01). In obese rats, amylin pretreatment partially restored hypothalamic leptin signaling (pSTAT3 immunoreactivity) within the ventromedial, but not the arcuate nucleus and up-regulated basal and leptin-stimulated signaling in the hindbrain area postrema. These findings provide both nonclinical and clinical evidence that amylin agonism restored leptin responsiveness in diet-induced obesity, suggesting that integrated neurohormonal approaches to obesity pharmacotherapy may facilitate greater weight loss by harnessing naturally occurring synergies.

Background: The optimal trastuzumab-based chemotherapy regimen for HER2-overexpressing, metastatic breast cancer is not known. The trastuzumab and vinorelbine or taxane (TRAVIOTA) study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial that was designed to compare these regimens., Methods: Eligible patients had HER2-overexpressing, metastatic breast cancer and had received no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either trastuzumab with weekly vinorelbine therapy or weekly taxane therapy (paclitaxel or docetaxel at the investigator's choice). Originally planned for 250 patients, the study was closed because of poor accrual with 81 evaluable patients, including 41 patients who received vinorelbine and 40 patients who received taxane., Results: Response rates were 51% and 40% for the vinorelbine/trastuzumab arm and the taxane/trastuzumab arm, respectively (Fisher exact test; P = .37). The median time to disease progression was 8.5 months and 6.0 months for the vinorelbine- and taxane-based arms, respectively (log-rank test; P = .09). Treatment with either regimen generally was well tolerated, yielding comparable rates of neurologic and gastrointestinal toxicity. Vinorelbine-based treatment was associated with more anemia and neutropenia and with 2 episodes of cardiotoxicity. Taxane-based therapy was associated with more dermatologic toxicity, myalgias, and fluid retention., Conclusions: Both vinorelbine/trastuzumab and taxane/trastuzumab treatments were active as first-line therapy for HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer and had comparable rates of efficacy and tolerability. The toxicities observed were the result of recognized side effects associated with each of the chemotherapy agents and schedules. These data can inform treatment decision making in this clinical setting.

The normal action of insulin to vasodilate and redistribute blood flow in support of skeletal muscle metabolism is impaired in insulin-resistant states. Increased endogenous endothelin contributes to endothelial dysfunction in obesity and diabetes. Here, we test the hypothesis that increased endogenous endothelin action also contributes to skeletal muscle insulin resistance via impairments in insulin-stimulated vasodilation. We studied nine lean and seven obese humans, measuring the metabolic and hemodynamic effects of insulin (300 mU . m(-2) . min(-1)) alone and during femoral artery infusion of BQ123 (an antagonist of type A endothelin receptors, 1 micromol/min). Endothelin antagonism augmented skeletal muscle responses to insulin in obese subjects through changes in both leg blood flow (LBF) and glucose extraction. Insulin-stimulated LBF was significantly increased in obese subjects only. These changes, combined with differential effects on glucose extraction, resulted in augmented insulin-stimulated leg glucose uptake in obese subjects (54.7 +/- 5.7 vs. 107.4 +/- 18.9 mg/min with BQ123), with no change in lean subjects (103.7 +/- 11.4 vs. 88.9 +/- 16.3, P = 0.04 comparing BQ123 across groups). BQ123 allowed augmented leg glucose extraction in obese subjects even in the face of NOS antagonism. These findings suggest that increased endogenous endothelin action contributes to insulin resistance in skeletal muscle of obese humans, likely through both vascular and tissue effects.

Effects of amylin and pair feeding (PF) on body weight and metabolic parameters were characterized in diet-induced obesity-prone rats. Peripherally administered rat amylin (300 microg/kg.d, 22d) reduced food intake and slowed weight gain: approximately 10% (P<0.05), similar to PF. Fat loss was 3-fold greater in amylin-treated rats vs. PF (P<0.05). Whereas PF decreased lean tissue (P<0.05 vs. vehicle controls; VEH), amylin did not. During wk 1, amylin and PF reduced 24-h respiratory quotient (mean+/-se, 0.82+/-0.0, 0.81+/-0.0, respectively; P<0.05) similar to VEH (0.84+/-0.01). Energy expenditure (EE mean+/-se) tended to be reduced by PF (5.67+/-0.1 kcal/h.kg) and maintained by amylin (5.86+/-0.1 kcal/h.kg) relative to VEH (5.77+/-0.0 kcal/h.kg). By wk 3, respiratory quotient no longer differed; however, EE increased with amylin treatment (5.74+/-0.09 kcal/.kg; P<0.05) relative to VEH (5.49+/-0.06) and PF (5.38+/-0.07 kcal/h.kg). Differences in EE, attributed to differences in lean mass, argued against specific amylin-induced thermogenesis. Weight loss in amylin and pair-fed rats was accompanied by similar increases arcuate neuropeptide Y mRNA (P<0.05). Amylin treatment, but not PF, increased proopiomelanocortin mRNA levels (P<0.05 vs. VEH). In a rodent model of obesity, amylin reduced body weight and body fat, with relative preservation of lean tissue, through anorexigenic and specific metabolic effects.

Purpose: Chemotherapy prolongs survival and improves quality of life (QOL) for good performance status (PS) patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Targeted therapies may improve chemotherapy effectiveness without worsening toxicity. SGN-15 is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), consisting of a chimeric murine monoclonal antibody recognizing the Lewis Y (Le(y)) antigen, conjugated to doxorubicin. Le(y) is an attractive target since it is expressed by most NSCLC. SGN-15 was active against Le(y)-positive tumors in early phase clinical trials and was synergistic with docetaxel in preclinical experiments. This Phase II, open-label study was conducted to confirm the activity of SGN-15 plus docetaxel in previously treated NSCLC patients., Experimental Design: Sixty-two patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC expressing Le(y), one or two prior chemotherapy regimens, and PS< or =2 were randomized 2:1 to receive SGN-15 200 mg/m2/week with docetaxel 35 mg/m2/week (Arm A) or docetaxel 35 mg/m2/week alone (Arm B) for 6 of 8 weeks. Intrapatient dose-escalation of SGN-15 to 350 mg/m2 was permitted in the second half of the study. Endpoints were survival, safety, efficacy, and quality of life., Results: Forty patients on Arm A and 19 on Arm B received at least one treatment. Patients on Arms A and B had median survivals of 31.4 and 25.3 weeks, 12-month survivals of 29% and 24%, and 18-month survivals of 18% and 8%, respectively. Toxicity was mild in both arms. QOL analyses favored Arm A., Conclusions: SGN-15 plus docetaxel is a well-tolerated and active second and third line treatment for NSCLC patients. Ongoing studies are exploring alternate schedules to maximize synergy between these agents.

Exenatide (exendin-4) is an incretin mimetic with potential antidiabetic activity. This study examined the effects of a continuous subcutaneous (SC) infusion of exenatide (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, or 0.8 microg/kg/day) or placebo (PBO) on glycemic control over 23 h intervals. Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin and/or diet received 10 infusions (4 exenatide, 6 PBO) on consecutive days. Exenatide was given in a dose-increasing design with at least one placebo infusion between each exenatide infusion, and with meals and a snack provided during the first 14 h of infusion. Plasma exenatide concentrations were dose-proportional. Plasma glucose (4-23 h) was lower in all exenatide arms compared to placebo (p<0.0001). The change in insulin/glucagon ratio and amylin concentrations from pre-infusion to post-infusion was increased (p<0.005, p<0.05, respectively) in the combined exenatide arms, but remained unchanged in the placebo groups. Nausea and vomiting were the most common treatment emergent adverse events. Exenatide infusion also appeared to have positive effects on beta-cell and alpha-cell function as measured by proinsulin/insulin ratios and mean glucagon concentrations. In summary, exenatide lowered plasma glucose during both prandial and fasting states when delivered as a continuous SC infusion over twenty-three hours, suggesting that exenatide can provide day-long glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Objective: This study evaluates the ability of the incretin mimetic exenatide (exendin-4) to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycemic control with maximally effective metformin doses., Research Design and Methods: A triple-blind, placebo-controlled, 30-week study at 82 U.S. sites was performed with 336 randomized patients. In all, 272 patients completed the study. The intent-to-treat population baseline was 53 +/- 10 years with BMI of 34.2 +/- 5.9 kg/m(2) and HbA(1c) of 8.2 +/- 1.1%. After 4 weeks of placebo, subjects self-administered 5 microg exenatide or placebo subcutaneously twice daily for 4 weeks followed by 5 or 10 microg exenatide, or placebo subcutaneously twice daily for 26 weeks. All subjects continued metformin therapy., Results: At week 30, HbA(1c) changes from baseline +/- SE for each group were -0.78 +/- 0.10% (10 microg), -0.40 +/- 0.11% (5 microg), and +0.08 +/- 0.10% (placebo; intent to treat; adjusted P < 0.002). Of evaluable subjects, 46% (10 microg), 32% (5 microg), and 13% (placebo) achieved HbA(1c) < or =7% (P < 0.01 vs. placebo). Exenatide-treated subjects displayed progressive dose-dependent weight loss (-2.8 +/- 0.5 kg [10 microg], -1.6 +/- 0.4 kg [5 microg]; P < 0.001 vs. placebo). The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal in nature and generally mild to moderate. Incidence of mild to moderate hypoglycemia was low and similar across treatment arms, with no severe hypoglycemia., Conclusions: Exenatide was generally well tolerated and reduced HbA(1c) with no weight gain and no increased incidence of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycemic control with metformin.

Objective: This study evaluated the effects of exenatide, a novel incretin mimetic, in hyperglycemic patients with type 2 diabetes unable to achieve glycemic control with metformin-sulfonylurea combination therapy., Research Design and Methods: A 30-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 733 subjects (aged 55 +/- 10 years, BMI 33.6 +/- 5.7 kg/m(2), A1C 8.5 +/- 1.0%; means +/- SD) randomized to 5 microg subcutaneous exenatide b.i.d. (arms A and B) or placebo for 4 weeks. Thereafter, arm A remained at 5 microg b.i.d. and arm B escalated to 10 microg b.i.d. Subjects continued taking their dose of metformin and were randomized to either maximally effective (MAX) or minimum recommended (MIN) doses of sulfonylurea., Results: Week 30 A1C changes from baseline (+/-SE) were -0.8 +/- 0.1% (10 microg), -0.6 +/- 0.1% (5 microg), and +0.2 +/- 0.1% (placebo; adjusted P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), yielding placebo-adjusted reductions of -1.0% (10 microg) and -0.8% (5 microg). In the evaluable population, exenatide-treated subjects were more likely to achieve A1C < or =7% than placebo-treated subjects (34% [10 microg], 27% [5 microg], and 9% [placebo]; P < 0.0001). Both exenatide arms demonstrated significant weight loss (-1.6 +/- 0.2 kg from baseline each exenatide arm, -0.9 +/- 0.2 kg placebo; P < or = 0.01 vs. placebo). Mild or moderate nausea was the most frequent adverse event. The incidence of mild/moderate hypoglycemia was 28% (10 microg), 19% (5 microg), and 13% (placebo) and appeared lower with MIN than with MAX sulfonylurea treatment., Conclusions: Exenatide significantly reduced A1C in patients with type 2 diabetes unable to achieve adequate glycemic control with maximally effective doses of combined metformin-sulfonylurea therapy. This improvement in glycemic control was associated with no weight gain and was generally well tolerated.

The effects of the incretin mimetic exenatide (exendin-4) on metabolic parameters, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell mass were examined in nondiabetic, insulin-resistant obese fa/fa Zucker rats. After 6 wk of treatment, ad libitum-fed exenatide-treated (EX) and pair-fed vehicle control (PF) rats had comparable food intake, body weight, hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), and fasting plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, and lipids. Concurrent decreases in food intake and weight gain were observed in EX and PF rats, compared with ad libitum-fed vehicle control (CON) rats (P < 0.001). The increases in HbA(1c) and fasting plasma insulin concentrations that occur during the normal progression of this disease model were significantly reduced in EX and PF rats, compared with CON rats (P < 0.001). The insulin sensitivity index (ISI; glucose infusion rate to plasma insulin concentration) measured during a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp was 224% higher in EX rats than CON rats (P < 0.001) and 61% higher in EX rats than PF rats (P < 0.004). The latter difference was despite comparable HbA(1c), fasting glucose, fasting insulin, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and daily food consumption between EX and PF animals. In the absence of exenatide, beta-cell mass was hyperbolically related to ISI (beta-cell mass * ISI was constant). Analogous to the disposition index, the beta-cell mass * ISI product was 63% greater in EX than PF rats (P < 0.05). Thus, exenatide increased beta-cell mass to a greater extent than would be expected in animals of comparable insulin resistance, suggesting a direct trophic effect on islet neogenesis in obese fa/fa rats independent of body weight and glycemia.

Objective: In vitro, insulin and endothelin (ET) both modulate adiponectin secretion from adipocyte cell lines. The current studies were performed to assess whether endogenous ET contributes to the acute action of insulin infusions on adiponectin levels in vivo in humans., Research Methods and Procedures: We studied 17 lean and 20 obese subjects (BMI 21.8 +/- 2.2 and 34.0 +/- 5.0 kg/m(2), respectively). Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp studies were performed using insulin infusion rates of 10, 30, or 300 mU/m(2) per minute alone or with concurrent infusion of BQ123, an antagonist of type A ET receptors. Circulating adiponectin levels were assessed at baseline and after achievement of steady-state glucose with the insulin infusion., Results: Adiponectin levels were lower in obese than lean subjects (6.76 +/- 3.66 vs. 8.37 +/- 2.79 microg/mL, p = 0.0148 adjusted for differences across gender). Insulin infusions suppressed adiponectin by a mean of 7.8% (p < 0.0001). In a subset of 13 lean and 14 obese subjects for whom data with and without BQ123 were available, there was no evident effect of BQ123 to modulate clamp-associated suppression of adiponectin (p = 0.16). Surprisingly, there was no evident relationship between steady-state insulin concentrations and adiponectin suppression (r = 0.14, p = 0.30), and again no effect of BQ123 to modify this relationship was seen., Discussion: Despite baseline differences in adiponectin levels, we observed equal suppression of adiponectin with insulin infusions in lean and obese subjects. ET receptor antagonism with BQ123 did not modulate this effect, suggesting that endogenous ET does not have a role in modifying the acute effects of insulin on adiponectin production and/or disposition.

Purpose: The pharmacology and tolerability of exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were studied., Methods: Two randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted. Treatment with oral antidiabetic agents was stopped 14 days before study initiation. In the first study (study A), eight subjects received placebo, 0.1-, 0.2-, 0.3-, and either 0.4-microg/kg exenatide or placebo five minutes before a meal combined with liquid acetaminophen (to assess the rate of gastric emptying) on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9. In the second study (study B), subjects received a single s.c. dose of exenatide or placebo on consecutive days. Part 1 of study B used exenatide doses of 0.01 and 0.1 microg/ kg; 0.02-, 0.05-, and 0.1-microg/kg doses were given in part 2. After an overnight fast, the study drug was injected 15 minutes before a meal (part 1) and before a meal and acetaminophen (part 2). Parts 1 and 2 of study B enrolled six and eight patients, respectively., Results: In both studies, plasma exenatide pharmacokinetic profiles appeared dose proportional. Exenatide doses of 0.02-0.2 microg/kg dose-dependently lowered postprandial glucose excursions. Exenatide suppressed postprandial plasma glucagon and slowed gastric emptying. There were no serious adverse events and no patient withdrawals related to treatment. Nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events and were mild to moderate in severity at doses ranging from 0.02 to 0.2 microg/kg., Conclusion: Administration of preprandial exenatide by s.c. injection resulted in dose-proportional exenatide pharmacokinetics and antidiabetic pharmacodynamic activity. At doses ranging from 0.02 to 0.2 microg/kg, exenatide dose-dependently reduced postprandial plasma glucose excursion by insulinotropism, suppression of plasma glucagon, and slowing of gastric emptying.

Objective: This study evaluated the ability of the incretin mimetic exenatide (exendin-4) to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes failing maximally effective doses of a sulfonylurea as monotherapy., Research Design and Methods: This was a triple-blind, placebo-controlled, 30-week study conducted at 101 sites in the U.S. After a 4-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, 377 subjects were randomized (60% men, age 55 +/- 11 years, BMI 33 +/- 6 kg/m(2), HbA(1c) 8.6 +/- 1.2% [+/-SD]) and began 4 weeks at 5 microg subcutaneous exenatide twice daily (before breakfast and dinner; arms A and B) or placebo. Subsequently, subjects in arm B were escalated to 10 microg b.i.d. exenatide. All subjects continued sulfonylurea therapy., Results: At week 30, HbA(1c) changes from baseline were -0.86 +/- 0.11, -0.46 +/- 0.12, and 0.12 +/- 0.09% (+/-SE) in the 10-microg, 5-microg, and placebo arms, respectively (adjusted P < 0.001). Of evaluable subjects with baseline HbA(1c) > 7% (n = 237), 41% (10 microg), 33% (5 microg), and 9% (placebo) achieved HbA(1c)

Background: Exenatide (exendin-4) exhibits dose-dependent glucoregulatory activity, but causes dose-limiting nausea and vomiting. This study was designed to formally assess the possibility of inducing tolerance to the side effects of nausea and vomiting at therapeutic doses of exenatide, using a dose-escalation methodology., Methods: In this two-arm, triple-blind, multicenter study, 123 subjects with type 2 diabetes were enrolled and randomized; 99 (80.5%) of them completed the study. Subjects in the exenatide-primed arm received subcutaneous exenatide, starting at 0.02 micro g/kg three times a day (TID) and increasing in 0.02 micro g/kg per dose increments every 3 days for 35 days. Subjects in the exenatide-naive arm received placebo TID for 35 days. At the end of this 35-day regimen, subjects in both arms received the same highest dose of exenatide (0.24 micro g/kg TID) for 3 days. Thus, the exenatide-naive arm received exenatide for the first time on Day 35., Results: The exenatide-primed arm had a lower proportion of subjects experiencing nausea and vomiting in response to exposure to the highest dose of exenatide (27 vs 56% in the exenatide-naive arm; p = 0.0018). Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative incidence were 0.28 in the exenatide-primed arm, compared with 0.68 in the exenatide-naive arm (p

Endothelial dysfunction reflects an imbalance of vasodilators and vasoconstrictors. Endogenous endothelin activity seems to be increased in human obesity and type 2 diabetes, and cellular studies suggest that this factor may itself reduce bioavailable nitric oxide (NO). We studied 20 lean, 20 obese, and 14 type 2 diabetic individuals under three protocols, measuring leg vascular responses to intra-arterial infusions of NG-monomethyl-l-arginine (l-NMMA; an inhibitor of NO synthase) alone or in combination with BQ123 (an antagonist of type A endothelin receptors) or phentolamine (used as a control vasodilator). NO synthase inhibition alone (study 1) produced an approximately 40% increase in leg vascular resistance (LVR) in all three participant groups, which was not statistically different across groups (increase in LVR: lean, 135 +/- 28; obese, 140 +/- 32; type 2 diabetic, 184 +/- 51 units; NS). By design, BQ123 at the infused rate of 3 micromol/min produced equivalent approximately 35% reductions in LVR across groups. The subsequent addition of l-NMMA produced a greater increase in LVR among obese participants than lean or type 2 diabetic participants (study 2: lean, 182 +/- 48; obese, 311 +/- 66; type 2 diabetic, 186 +/- 40; P = 0.07). Compared with study 1, the effect of l-NMMA was magnified by BQ123 in obese participants but not in lean or type 2 diabetic participants (P = 0.005, study 1 vs. 2; P = 0.03 for group effect). Phentolamine (75 mg/min) produced vasodilation in obese participants comparable to that seen with BQ123 but failed to augment the L-NMMA response. Endothelin antagonism unmasks or augments NO synthesis capacity in obese but not type 2 diabetic participants. This suggests that impaired NO bioavailability as a result of endogenous endothelin may contribute to endothelial dysfunction in obesity, in addition to direct vasoconstrictor effects of endothelin. In contrast, endothelin antagonism alone is insufficient to restore impaired NO bioavailability in diabetes.

Objective: AC2993 (synthetic exendin-4; exenatide) is a peptide that enhances glucose-dependent insulin secretion, suppresses inappropriately elevated glucagon secretion, and slows gastric emptying. AC2993 also promotes beta-cell proliferation and neogenesis in vitro and in animal models. This study examines the activity and safety of subcutaneously injected AC2993 in patients with type 2 diabetes currently treated with diet and/or oral antidiabetic agents (OAAs)., Research Design and Methods: A total of 109 patients treated with diet and a sulfonylurea and/or metformin were enrolled in a blinded study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three subcutaneously (SC) injected regimens of AC2993 (0.08 micro g/kg) or placebo for 28 days., Results: All three AC2993 regimens led to significant reductions in serum fructosamine relative to placebo (P

Despite the advent of new treatments, glucose control in the type 2 diabetes population is unsatisfactory. AC2993 (synthetic exendin-4; exenatide), a novel glucose-dependent insulinotropic agent, exhibited notable antidiabetic potential in two clinical studies in patients with type 2 diabetes. In study A, 24 subjects received sc injections of study medication (0.1 micro g/kg AC2993 or placebo) twice daily with meals for 5 d. Statistically significant reductions in mean postprandial circulating concentrations of glucose, insulin, and glucagon occurred following treatment with AC2993. In study B, 13 subjects receiving a single dose of study medication (0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 micro g/kg AC2993 or placebo) following an overnight fast had reduced fasting plasma glucose concentrations during the subsequent 8-h period. The relative glucose and insulin concentration profiles were consistent with glucose-dependent insulinotropism. AC2993 was well tolerated. Mild transient headache, nausea, and vomiting were the main adverse events. In conclusion, AC2993 acutely and markedly reduces fasting and postprandial glucose concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes. During fasting, glucose-dependent enhancement of insulin secretion and suppression of glucagon secretion are the predominant mechanisms, and postprandially, slowing of gastric emptying is additionally operative. This robust antidiabetic effect warrants further evaluation of AC2993.

New therapies for the long-term treatment of type 2 diabetes are needed to ameliorate declining pancreatic beta-cell function. Ideally, these therapies should lower fasting and post-prandial blood glucose, produce no hypoglycemia or weight gain, cause no other limiting side effects, and reduce cardiovascular complications. Exenatide (synthetic exendin-4) is a potential therapeutic which may fulfill these criteria. Dose-ranging studies have identified an optimal dose of 0.05 to 0.2 microgram/kg administered subcutaneously twice daily. Pharmacokinetic data support a pivotal study design which mitigates the transient nausea observed in early studies by including a dose initiation period of 1 month at 5 micrograms twice daily, followed by maintenance therapy at 10 micrograms twice daily. Ongoing studies suggest exenatide improves glycemic control through a combination of mechanisms discussed in this review.

Obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) exhibit impaired endothelial function, which is strongly and directly correlated with both testosterone levels and insulin resistance. Endothelial dysfunction is considered a potent risk factor for macrovascular disease. Because troglitazone (Tgz) improves both hormonal profiles and insulin sensitivity, we tested whether Tgz treatment ameliorates endothelial function in these patients. We studied leg blood flow (LBF) responses to graded intrafemoral artery infusion of the endothelium-dependent vasodilator methacholine chloride (MCh) and to a 4-h hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (120 mU/m(2) x min) in 10 PCOS, before and after 3 months treatment with Tgz (600 mg/d). A group of 13 obese women (OBW) matched for age, weight, body fat (>40% in both groups), blood pressure, and total cholesterol served as controls. PCOS patients exhibited elevated free testosterone (fT) and triglycerides (TG) and lower high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels compared with OBW [14.0 +/- 1.0 vs. 3.7 +/- 0.6 pmol/liter (P < 0.0001), 1.60 +/- 0.28 vs. 0.94 +/- 0.09 mmol/liter (P < 0.02), and 0.91 +/- 0.04 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.04 mmol/liter (P < 0.005), respectively]. Tgz treatment reduced fT levels, but did not improve the TG and high density lipoprotein profile [to 9.7 +/- 2.8 pmol/liter (P < 0.007), 1.49 +/- 0.34 mmol/liter (P = NS), and 0.93 +/- 0.07 mmol/liter (P = NS), respectively]. Basal LBF was unchanged after Tgz. In PCOS compared with OBW, insulin stimulated glucose disposal (52.7 +/- 6.6 vs. 85.5 +/- 4.4 micromol/kg fat-free mass x min; P < 0.0005) and vasodilation (increase in LBF, 22 +/- 14% vs. 59 +/- 15%; P < 0.05) were significantly improved after Tgz treatment to 68.8 +/- 7.2 micromol/kg fat-free mass x min (P < 0.0001) and 101 +/- 48% (P < 0.03), respectively. The increase in LBF in response to MCh in PCOS was markedly more pronounced after treatment (P < 0.01, by ANOVA) and was similar to that observed in OBW. Before Tgz treatment, maximal LBF increments in response to MCh were 130 +/- 25% and 233 +/- 29% in PCOS and OBW, respectively (P < 0.01). After Tgz treatment, PCOS values improved, achieving increments similar to those in OBW (245 +/- 45%; P < 0.04). Tgz treatment in PCOS improves both hormonal and metabolic features. These modifications are associated with improvement of endothelial function, suggesting that Tgz could be a useful tool to reduce the risk of macrovascular disease in women with PCOS and perhaps in other insulin-resistant syndromes.

Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is impaired in clinical states of insulin resistance such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. Individuals who have hyperinsulinemic insulin resistance have relatively elevated circulating levels of endothelin (ET)-1, suggesting that ET-1 may be important in the endothelial dysfunction and alterations of vascular tone in these conditions. In 8 lean subjects, 12 nondiabetic obese subjects, and 8 subjects with type 2 diabetes, we measured basal and methacholine-stimulated rates of leg blood flow (LBF) and total serum nitrates (NOx) before and after the intrafemoral arterial administration of BQ123, a specific blocker of ET(A) receptors. BQ123 produced significant vasodilation in the obese and type 2 diabetic subjects (leg vascular resistance = mean arterial pressure/LBF fell by 34 and 36%; P < 0.005) but not in the lean subjects (13%; P = NS, P = 0.018 comparing all groups). ET(A) blockade did not change basal NOx flux (NOx*LBF). This suggests increased basal ET-1 constrictor tone among obese and type 2 diabetic subjects. BQ123 corrected the baseline defect in endothelium-dependent vasodilation seen in obese and type 2 diabetic subjects, suggesting an important contribution of ET-1 to endothelial dysfunction in these subjects. In contrast to basal conditions, stimulated NOx flux was augmented by BQ123 in obese and type 2 diabetic subjects but not in L subjects (P = 0.04), suggesting a combined effect of ET(A) blockade to reduce constrictor tone and augment dilator tone. Endothelin seems to contribute to endothelial dysfunction and the regulation of vascular tone in human obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Over the past 10 years it has become clear that intact vascular function, especially at the level of the endothelium, is paramount in the prevention or delay of cardiovascular disease. It has also become clear that insulin itself, in addition to its metabolic actions, directly effects vascular endothelium and smooth muscle. Insulin, at normal physiologic concentrations, causes changes in skeletal muscle blood flow in healthy, insulin-sensitive subjects. Insulin's effect on the endothelium is mediated through its own receptor and insulin signalling pathways, resulting in the increased release of nitric oxide. Insulin's vascular actions are impaired in insulin-resistant conditions such as obesity, Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and hypertension, which could contribute to the excessive rates of cardiovascular disease in these groups. Insulin-resistant states of obesity and Type II diabetes show a multitude of metabolic abnormalities that could cause vascular dysfunction. Non-esterified fatty acid levels increase long before hyperglycaemia becomes present. Raised non-esterified fatty acids impair insulin's effect on glucose uptake in skeletal muscle and the vascular endothelium and thus could have detrimental effects on the vasculature, leading to premature cardiovascular disease.

Recent availability of expanded treatment options for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes has not translated into easier and significantly better glycemic and metabolic management. Patients with type 1 diabetes continue to experience increased risk of hypoglycemic episodes and progressive weight gain resulting from intensive insulin treatment, despite the recent availability of a variety of insulin analog. Given the progressive nature of the disease, most patients with type 2 diabetes inevitably proceed from oral agent monotherapy to combination therapy and, ultimately, require exogenous insulin replacement. Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes is also accompanied by untoward weight gain. Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes continue to be characterized by marked postprandial hyperglycemia. Two hormones still in development are candidates for pharmacologic intervention, have novel modes of action (some centrally mediated), and show great promise in addressing some of the unmet needs of current diabetes management. Pramlintide acetate, an analog of the beta cell hormone amylin and the first non-insulin related therapeutic modality for type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients with severe beta cell failure, may be useful as adjunctive therapy to insulin. The principal anti-diabetic effects of pramlintide arise from interactions via its cognate receptors located in the central nervous system resulting in postprandial glucagon suppression, modulation of nutrient absorption rate, and reduction of food intake. Another polypeptide hormone, exendin-4, exerts at least some of its pharmacologic actions as an agonist at the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor. GLP-1 and related compounds exhibit multiple modes of action, the most notable being a glucose-dependent insulinotropic effects and the potential to preserve or improve the beta-cell function. The latter effect could potentially halt or delay the progressive deterioration of the diabetic state associated with type 2 diabetes. Physiologically, both amylin and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1, along with insulin, are involved in a coordinated and concerted interplay between hormones acting both centrally and peripherally to provide meticulous control over the rate of appearance of exogenous and endogenous glucose and to match that rate to the rate of glucose disappearance. Both hormones are deficient in diabetes. Therapies directed at restoring this complex physiology have the potential to facilitate glucose control and thus minimize the attendant complications of diabetes.