Search

To study the effects of the anti-IL-23A antibody risankizumab on the IL-36γ/IL-23A/IL-17A signalling cascade we used a newly developed 3D skin model consisting of primary human keratinocytes, fibroblasts and γδ-T-cells. In this in vitro study we developed new full-thickness 3D skin models containing normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK), normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) and IL-23A responsive and IL-17A producing γδ-T-cells. The effects of IL-36γ stimulation with and without risankizumab treatment on IL-23A and IL-17A expression were examined at the RNA and protein levels. In preliminary monolayer experiments stimulation of γδ-T-cells with IL-23A promoted the IL-17A expression that was inhibited after risankizumab treatment. Using 3D skin models containing γδ-T-cells, we found that stimulation with IL-36γ significantly increased not only IL-23A but also IL-17A expression. These effects were inhibited by concomitant treatment with risankizumab. Our results showed that blockade of IL-23A has inhibitory effects on the IL-36γ/IL-23A feedforward loop. Our newly developed 3D skin model containing IL-23A responsive and IL-17A producing γδ-T-cells enables molecular analysis of targeted therapies aimed at the IL-36γ/IL-23A/IL-17A signalling cascade in psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Macrophages play a critical role for the persistence of tattoo ink in human skin. However, a comparison to other skin‐resident and blood circulating immune cells and a profound analysis of REACH‐compliant tattoo ink are unmet medical needs. We hence characterized the size distribution of ink particles using physicochemical methods. We studied the uptake of tattoo ink by key human skin cells and blood‐derived immune cells using optical and electron microscopy as well as flow cytometry. Scanning electron microscopy of ink revealed its crystalline structure, and a tendency towards aggregations was indicated by size changes upon diluting it. Flow cytometric analyses of skin and immune cells after incubation with tattoo ink demonstrated an increase in cellular granularity upon uptake and red ink additionally evoked fluorescent signals. Human macrophages were most potent in internalizing ink in full thickness 3D skin models. Macrophage cultures demonstrated that the ink did not lead to elevated inflammatory mediators, and showed no indications for toxicity, even after nice days. Strikingly, monocytes were most efficient in ink uptake, but displayed reduced viability, whereas granulocytes and lymphocytes showed only temporary ink uptake with flow cytometric signals declining after 1 day. Mechanistic studies on ink retention by corticosteroids or dexpanthenol in macrophage cultures demonstrated that these compounds do not lead to ink excretion, but even slightly increase the ink load in macrophages. The highly motile monocytes, precursors of macrophages, may play an underrated role for tattoo ink translocation from dermal blood vessels into internal organs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Summary: A scar develops following the appearance of a deep tissue defect as part of the physiological wound healing process. The initial inflammatory response is followed by proliferation of connective tissue cells, which form fibrosis as a final tissue substitute. Disorders can occur at all stages of the process and are most commonly manifested as impaired wound healing or the formation of atrophic and hypertrophic scars or keloids. The focus of this article is on the treatment of pathologic scars, which are an indication for therapy due to functional limitations, complaints, and stigmatization, among other reasons. Conservative medical, physical, surgical and laser therapeutic approaches are pursued. The basis for this is an understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms and factors influencing the choice of therapy, as well as an interdisciplinary and interprofessional therapeutic approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In vitro study on the molecular effects of post-treatment after micro-needling applications with a dexpanthenol-containing ointment (DCO) using 3D skin models. Patients and Methods: In this in vitro study, full-thickness human 3D skin models were treated with a micro-needling device according to its clinical application. For post-treatment, some of the models were additionally treated with a dexpanthenol-containing ointment (DCO). Histological samples were taken at 0, 24 and 48 hours. Gene expression analysis was performed after 24 hours. Results: Histological examination showed that DCO post-treated 3D skin models revealed a completed wound closure 24 hours after the micro-needling procedure. In contrast, DCO-untreated models still clearly exhibited the micro-needling lesions after the same period of time. After 48 hours, all models revealed a completed wound healing. In skin models that received micro-needling but no post-treatment with DCO, microarray analysis identified an upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines and a downregulation of skin barrier and differentiation markers. In contrast, post-treatment with DCO leads to accelerated wound healing without affecting the initial inflammatory response caused by micro-needling, which leads to the subsequent collagen expression. This data was supported by qRT-PCR analyses. Conclusion: Post-treatment with DCO accelerates epidermal wound healing after micro-needling of 3D skin models without impairing the immunostimulatory properties of micro-needling. These findings can help to optimise the aftercare routine after micro-needling procedures and to shorten the downtime for the patient after treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Benzyl alcohol is a widely used preservative, solvent and fragrance material. According to published data, it is a rare sensitizer in humans. Objectives: To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients with positive patch test reactions to benzyl alcohol and to check the reliability of the patch test preparation benzyl alcohol 1% pet. Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), 2010–2019. Results: Of 70 867 patients patch tested with benzyl alcohol 1% pet., 146 (0.21%) showed a positive reaction, most of them (89%) only weakly positive. The number of doubtful and irritant reactions significantly exceeded the number of positive reactions. Reproducibility of positive test reactions was low. Among benzyl alcohol‐positive patients, compared to benzyl alcohol‐negative patients, there were significantly more patients with leg dermatitis (17.8% vs. 8.6%), more patients aged 40 years or more (81.5% vs. 70.5%) and more patients who were tested because of a suspected intolerance reaction to topical medications (34.9% vs. 16.6%). Concomitant positive reactions were mainly seen to fragrances, preservatives and ointment bases. Conclusions: Sensitization to benzyl alcohol occurs very rarely, mainly in patients with stasis dermatitis. In view of our results, benzyl alcohol cannot be regarded as a significant contact allergen, and therefore marking it as skin sensitizer 1B and labelling it with H 317 is not helpful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false‐positive, or the breakdown test is false‐negative. Objectives: To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients positive to FM I, but not to its fragrance constituents. Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 2005 and 2019. Three patient groups were defined according to their reaction pattern: Group I, FM I positive and ≥1 single fragrance positive in the breakdown test (n = 1912); Group II, FM I positive and breakdown test negative (n = 1318); Group III, FM I negative (n = 19 790). Results: Regarding the pattern of concomitant reactions to other fragrances, Group II had an intermediate position between Group I and Group III. In other respects (age and sex distribution, frequency of sensitization to non‐fragrance baseline series allergens), Group II rather resembled Group I. Conclusions: Not every positive reaction to FM I in patients with negative breakdown tests is false‐positive. There may be false‐negative reactions to the single fragrance components when patch tested at 1% pet. Raising patch concentrations of some single fragrances is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]