Search

The article presents information on transmission of Hepatitis C virus infection. Endoscopy is a method of examining the inside of a patient's digestive tract. It involves inserting a flexible, illuminated tube through the mouth or anus, allowing the doctor to examine, biopsy, and sometimes treat diseases of the digestive tract. Endoscopy often produces a small amount of bleeding, particularly if biopsies are performed. None of the initially uninfected patients who underwent endoscopy had acquired HCV infection at the time of follow-up. It made no difference whether biopsies were performed or whether disposable or reusable forceps had been used.

Background and Aim: In presence of malignant dysphagia, in patients unfit for surgery, the placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) represents a safe and effective palliative treatment. Esophageal stents (ES) present an over-the-wire mechanism where the stent is deployed under X-ray control. Recently a through-the-scope (TTS) ES was launched. The aim of our retrospective study is to assess the technical and clinical success of the new TTS-ES., Materials and Methods: Patients with malignant dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer or ab-extrinsic compression, who underwent TTS esophageal stent in six Italian endoscopic referral centers, were retrospectively reviewed., Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled. TTS stent placement was successful in 39/40 patients (97.5%). 31 patients had an Ogilvie score of 4, nine an Ogilvie 3. After 2 weeks from stent placement 29 reported Ogilvie score of 0, eight a score of 1. None of the patients developed retrosternal pain requiring drugs. No patient experienced perforation, bleeding or migration. A total of seven patients (18%) developed dysphagia as late adverse event (AE)., Conclusion: Through-the-scope ES presented less AEs, in terms of bleeding and perforation, if compared to the previous published data. An anti-migration system could be helpful, especially when the stent is placed for "ab-extrinseco" malignant dysphagia., (© 2020 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

To obtain optimal visualization of the colonic mucosa during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, an adequate bowel preparation is mandatory, but a standardized protocol is still lacking for pediatric patients. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is currently the most used laxative, but the amount of liquid to be taken orally is a large volume for the pediatric population and it may not be well tolerated. The aim of our preliminary trial was to evaluate efficacy, tolerability, and safety of sodium picosulphate-magnesium citrate (SPMC) used as bowel preparation before colonoscopy in children. Fifty children who needed a colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled between April and December 2013 and SPMC was administered to them as bowel preparation. A questionnaire about the product tolerance was completed by the patients' parents. The grade of bowel preparation and any related side effect were evaluated. The mean value of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale was 7, out of a maximum of 9. Only 5 patients had an inadequate bowel preparation. Seventy percent of the patients considered the taste of the preparation very palatable. The remaining 26% considered it not palatable or not palatable at all. During the preparation, 18% of children complained of nausea, 20% abdominal pain, 2% vomiting, and 2% manifested headache. Bowel preparation with SPMC offers an efficient alternative to PEG and allows, on equal terms of efficacy, tolerability and safety, a much lower amount of laxative to ingest, and remarkable quality, especially in infants and toddlers.

Background: Evidence from controlled trials and meta-analyses suggests that laparoendoscopic rendezvous (LERV) is preferable to sequential treatment in the management of common bile duct stones., Materials and Methods: With this retrospective analysis of a prospective database that included consecutive patients treated for cholecystocholedocholithiasis at our institution between January 2007 and July 2015, we compared LERV with sequential treatment. The primary endpoint was global cost, defined as the cost/patient/hospital stay, and the secondary end points were efficacy and morbidity. Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney test was used., Results: Of a total of 249 consecutive patients, 143 underwent LERV (group A) and 106 a two-stage procedure (group B). Based on an average cost of €613 for 1 day of hospital stay in the General Surgery Department, the overall median cost of treatment was €6403 for group A and €8194 for group B (p < 0.001). Operative time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay was significantly longer for group B (p < 0.001). No mortality in either group was observed. The postoperative complications rate was significantly higher in group B than in group A (24.5 vs. 10.5%; p = 0.003). No significant difference in the postoperative pancreatitis rate or the number of patients with increased serum amylase at 24 h was observed in either group., Conclusion: Our study suggests that LERV is preferable to sequential treatment not only in terms of less morbidity, but also of lower costs accrued by a shorter hospital stay. However, the longer operative time raises multiple organizational issues in the coordination of surgery and endoscopy services.

Background: In patients with Fontan circulation, the liver is profoundly affected by chronic venous stasis. Little is known about early hepatic changes in this population., Methods: We performed echocardiography, abdominal ultrasound, liver elastography, cardiac catheterization, esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy and calculated MELD-XI score in 64 Fontan patients (69% minors), at an interval of 1-15years since Fontan., Results: Cardiac output remained stable in the first 5years after Fontan, then significantly decreased (r=-0.45, p(r=0)=0.003). NYHA class significantly increased after Fontan. Patients in NYHA class II/III (n=21, 14 minors) had significantly higher hepatic pressures, but normal ventricular function and pulmonary vascular resistances (PVR). Patients with pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) ≥15mmHg (n=12, 6 minors) and those with PVR≥2WU*m(2) (n=27, 25 minors), had higher hepatic pressures (p<0.0001), a higher incidence of liver collaterals and/or esophageal varices (p<0.0001) and splenomegaly (p<0.02). Liver stiffness (LS) was elevated in most patients (median, 25th-75th percentile:17.3KPa, 14.1-21.4). It rapidly increased during the first 5-years after Fontan, compared to the following 5-years (from 12.2KPa, 9.8-14.1 to 17.5KPa, 14.3-24.5, p=0.007), then remained stable (19.1KPa, 16.9-22.6, p=0.60). MELD-XI score increased linearly with the time interval since Fontan (r=0.31, p(r=0)=0.01). For patients above 12years we found a linear correlation between LS and MELD-XI score in the 6-15years period after Fontan (r=0.40. p(r=0)=0.04). The overall incidence of established liver cirrhosis was 22%., Conclusions: This is the largest study showing that Fontan circulation prompts early, progressive and eventually irreversible liver damage. Precautions should be taken immediately after Fontan, to protect this fragile population., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Safety of propofol sedation in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing colonoscopy or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains to be studied. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of propofol is safe for endoscopic procedures more complex than gastroscopy in patients with liver cirrhosis in a prospective controlled study., Methods: Two hundred and fourteen consecutive patients, with or without cirrhosis, who underwent colonoscopy or ERCP with propofol sedation were recruited between January and June 2009. Administration of sedation was performed by anesthesiologists and outcome measures were recorded. Main outcomes were complication rates and recovery times., Results: Sixty-one (28.5%) cirrhotic patients and 153 (71.5%) noncirrhotic patients were included. The incidence of sedation-related complications did not significantly differ between the two populations (11.5 vs. 17.0%, respectively, P=0.31). The mean (±SD) dose of propofol administered (213±86 vs. 239±100 mg, P=0.07), the mean time to achieve adequate sedation (3.3±1.1 vs. 3.0±1.2 min, P=0.21), the mean total duration of the endoscopic procedure (24.5±10.6 vs. 27.4±11.8 min, P=0.08), the mean time to reach Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale 5 (17.2±4.4 vs. 18.4±5.6 min, P=0.15), the mean time from completion of the procedure to release (9.0±2.5 vs. 9.1±3.2 min, P=0.86), and the mean time to full recovery (42.2±7.3 vs. 42.3±7.8 min, P=0.88) were very similar between the two groups. The limitation of this study was lack of randomization, and a control group of cirrhotic patients using standard sedation with benzodiazepines and opioids., Conclusion: Propofol deep sedation administered by an anesthesiologist with appropriate monitorings seems to be a safe procedure during colonoscopy or ERCP in cirrhotic patients.

Background/aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the standard approach for the management of biliary complications in liver transplant patients; however, its safety and efficacy have not been established in this setting. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of ERCP in transplant patients., Methods: The case reports of 1,500 liver transplant patients were reviewed. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients were matched 1:2 with non-OLT patients and followed-up for long-term outcome (median, 7.4 years)., Results: Of the 1,500 liver transplant patients, 94 (6.3%) underwent 150 ERCPs after OLT. Anastomotic strictures were present in 45 patients, biliary stones in 24, biliary leaks in 7, papillary stenosis in 2, and primary sclerosing cholangitis in 1. An ERCP success rate of 90.7% was achieved; biliary stenting led to resolution of the bile leak in 7/7 (100%) patients, and biliary stones were removed in 21/24 (87.5%) patients. In addition, 34 of 45 patients with anastomotic stricture underwent endoscopic dilation. We obtained complete resolution in 22/34 (64.7%) patients. OLT patients did not show a higher probability of complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.04), of pancreatitis (OR, 0.80) or of bleeding (OR, 1.34)., Conclusions: ERCP is safe and effective for the treatment of post-OLT biliary complications, has a low rate of pancreatitis and results in a durable effect.