Search

Your search keyword '"Baranidharan, Ganesan"' showing total 280 results

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Author "Baranidharan, Ganesan" Remove constraint Author: "Baranidharan, Ganesan"
280 results on '"Baranidharan, Ganesan"'

Search Results

1. ECAP-controlled closed-loop versus open-loop SCS for the treatment of chronic pain: 36-month results of the EVOKE blinded randomized clinical trial.

3. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)®: Recommendations for Spinal Cord Stimulation Long-Term Outcome Optimization and Salvage Therapy

5. Five-Year Longitudinal Follow-Up of Restorative Neurostimulation Shows Durability of Effectiveness in Patients With Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain Associated With Multifidus Muscle Dysfunction

7. Three-Year Durability of Restorative Neurostimulation Effectiveness in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Multifidus Muscle Dysfunction

8. A Novel Pulsed Stimulation Pattern in Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Results and Postulated Mechanisms of Action in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back and Leg Pain

9. Long-Term Outcomes of Restorative Neurostimulation in Patients With Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain Secondary to Multifidus Dysfunction: Two-Year Results of the ReActiv8-B Pivotal Trial

10. Applicability and Validity of an e-Health Tool for the Appropriate Referral and Selection of Patients With Chronic Pain for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results From a European Retrospective Study

16. Radiofrequency for chronic lumbosacral and cervical pain: Results of a consensus study using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method

18. Surgical microdiscectomy versus transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc (NERVES): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation

20. To Trial or Not to Trial Before Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: The Patients’ View From the TRIAL-STIM Randomized Controlled Trial

21. Chronic Abdominal Discomfort Syndrome (CADS): Defining and Discussing a Novel Diagnosis

22. 24-Month Outcomes of Indirect Decompression Using a Minimally Invasive Interspinous Fixation Device versus Standard Open Direct Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Comparison

23. 24-Month Outcomes of Indirect Decompression Using a Minimally Invasive Interspinous Fixation Device versus Standard Open Direct Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Comparison.

27. EP127 / #260 QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY LONDON POSTGRADUATE CERTIFICATION (PGCERT): AN ACCREDITATION IN NEUROMODULATION AND PAIN MANAGEMENT

28. O002 / #152 ECAP-CONTROLLED CLOSED-LOOP SCS IN A REAL-WORLD SETTING IN EUROPE

30. RF001 / #55 APPROPRIATENESS CRITERIA FOR RADIOFREQUENCY INTERVENTIONS IN CHRONIC LOW BACK AND NECK PAIN: EUROPEAN CONSENSUS AND E-HEALTH TOOL

31. The Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee on Best Practices for Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation

32. Chronic Abdominal Discomfort Syndrome (CADS): Defining and Discussing a Novel Diagnosis.

33. New Therapy for Refractory Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain—Restorative Neurostimulation to Activate the Lumbar Multifidus: One Year Results of a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial

34. Does a screening trial for spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain of neuropathic origin have clinical utility and cost-effectiveness (TRIAL-STIM)? a randomised controlled trial

36. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) Recommendations for Infection Prevention and Management

37. Long-Term Outcomes of Restorative Neurostimulation in Patients With Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain Secondary to Multifidus Dysfunction:Two-Year Results of the ReActiv8-B Pivotal Trial

38. Applicability and Validity of an e-Health Tool for the Appropriate Referral and Selection of Patients With Chronic Pain for Spinal Cord Stimulation:Results From a European Retrospective Study

40. Correction to: Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin have Clinical Utility and Cost-Effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

41. Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin have Clinical Utility and Cost-Effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

45. Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin Have Clinical Utility (TRIAL-STIM)? 36-Month Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

48. O088 / #537 PATIENT SELECTION FOR SPINAL CORD STIMULATION: THE IMPORTANCE OF AN INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources