Search

Objectives: Previous studies of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) ≥10 mm were performed by experienced endoscopists, and therefore their skills might have significantly influenced results. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of CSP for SSLs ≥10 mm between experienced and trainee endoscopists., Methods: In a 1:1 propensity score matched retrospective cohort study, we compared the complete resection rate, en-bloc resection rate, adverse event rate, and procedure time between experienced and trainee groups. Thirteen endoscopists performed CSP, and we defined the experienced group as endoscopists with board certification from the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society., Results: We examined 616 lesions with SSLs ≥10 mm resected by CSP between February 2018 and May 2022. We excluded 61 lesions from the analysis because they had simultaneously undergone hot snare polypectomy ( n = 57) or had been taken over by experienced endoscopists from trainees in the CSP procedure ( n = 4). Finally, we identified 217 propensity score-matched pairs ( n = 434). Between experienced and trainee groups, the results were complete resection rate (100 vs. 100%; p = 1.00), en-bloc resection rate (73.2 vs. 75.6%; p = 0.24), adverse event rate (3.2 vs. 2.8%; p = 0.77), or procedure time (6.2 vs. 5.9 min; p = 0.64)., Conclusions: We have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of CSP for SSLs ≥10 mm performed by experienced and trainee endoscopists., Competing Interests: None., (© 2024 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Video 1Nonexposed endoscopic wall inversion surgery for local resection of microscopic residual tumor after endoscopic submucosal dissection., Competing Interests: The authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication., (© 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background and study aims Endoscopic treatment strategies for small superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia (SDET) have not been established, and the R0 resection rates of all previously reported endoscopic techniques are somewhat low. Furthermore, no reports of cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMRC), which is reportedly associated with a relatively high R0 resection rate, have been evaluated in sufficient numbers of patients. Therefore, we assessed the efficacy and safety of EMRC for SDETs ≤ 10 mm in a retrospective cohort study. Patients and methods We examined a prospectively maintained database and identified 248 consecutive patients (248 lesions) who had undergone endoscopic resection for SDETs ≤ 10 mm between January 2017 and June 2022. Our treatment strategy was consistent, with EMRC indicated for all SDETs ≤ 10 mm without non-lifting signs. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. Results Overall, 20 lesions had non-lifting signs and were selected for endoscopic submucosal dissection, while the remaining 228 lesions were treated with EMRC. As a result of EMRC, the median tumor size was 5 mm, and the mean procedure time was 5 minutes. Most of the lesions (89.2%) were located in the descending part. The R0 resection rate was 97.4% (222/228 cases), and the en bloc resection rate was 99.6%. Only seven patients(3.1%) experienced adverse events (6 patients, delayed bleeding; 1 patient, acute pancreatitis), which were successfully managed without surgical intervention. Furthermore, no recurrences were observed. Conclusions We have demonstrated that EMRC is an effective and safe treatment for SDETs ≤ 10 mm that do not have non-lifting signs., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A) is a life-threatening disease that can develop weeks after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). MIS-A symptoms include multiorgan involvement, especially gastrointestinal tract and heart involvement, and Kawasaki disease-like symptoms. We herein report a 44-year-old Japanese man with MIS-A who had contracted COVID-19 five weeks ago and went into shock after acute gastroenteritis, acute kidney injury, and Kawasaki disease-like symptoms. Methylprednisone pulse and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin resulted in recovery of shock and his renal function, but diffuse ST-segment elevation on electrocardiography and pericardial effusion with a fever emerged after therapy. Additional granulocyte-monocyte adsorptive apheresis successfully ameliorated the cardiac involvement.

We observed a case of pancreatic metastasis of lung cancer being resected following chemoradiotherapy and reported with a review of the literature. The patient was a 60-year-old man and previously underwent an upper lobectomy of the right lung for the primary lesion and chemoradiotherapy for the metastatic lesion in the lower lobe of the right lung. During the follow-up period, positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan revealed a tumor in the pancreatic body, which was a hyperechoic mass on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and hypervascularity on Sonazoid angiography. Fine needle aspiration cytology under EUS revealed dense growth of tumor cells with increased nuclear chromatin, markedly atypical nuclei, and eosinophilic sporangia. Immunostaining showed CK7 (+), CK20 (-), TTF-1 (+), and napsin A (+). He was diagnosed with pancreatic metastasis of lung cancer, underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy, and discharged without perioperative complications. The right lower lobe metastasis of lung cancer was detected during an outpatient visit following chemoradiotherapy. However, he was found rectal cancer and considered a scheduled surgery. Forty-two months postoperatively, he was found dead at home;the cause of death was shock due to extreme dehydration.