1. Hearing outcomes of cochlear implant recipients with pre-operatively identified cochlear dead regions
- Author
-
Shrivastava, MK, Eitutis, ST, Lee, JW, Axon, PR, Donnelly, NP, Tysome, Bance, ML, Bance, Manohar [0000-0001-8050-3617], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
- Subjects
Male ,Dead region ,Hearing Tests ,Deafness ,Middle Aged ,Cochlear Implantation ,Cochlea ,TEN ,Cochlear Implants ,Treatment Outcome ,Hearing ,Case-Control Studies ,Preoperative Period ,Humans ,Female ,Postoperative Period ,Cochlear implant ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
Objectives: To determine how patients who did not meet UK TA166 NICE criteria for cochlear implantation (CI) but were subsequently found to have cochlear dead regions (DRs) performed with CI.Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was performed on CI recipients: 152 controls and 40 in the DR group. Of these, 34 pairs were matched by pre-operative Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) scores and compared.Results: The forty DR patients had a median age at implantation of 56 years. Their mean pre-operative BKB score of 23% increased to 78% after CI. Thirty-seven experienced improvements in BKB scores. In matched case-control analysis, the improvement in mean BKB score with CI was no different (p = 0.19) between the DR group and control group; a similar proportion of patients benefitted in each group.Discussion: This study is the largestreport to date of performance of patients with DRs, before and after CI. The DR group gain similar benefit as the controls.Conclusion: Patients with DRs, who did not meet TA166 NICE criteria, received the same benefit as those who did. TEN testing to detect DRs should be included in routine CI work-up where standard criteria are not met.
- Published
- 2020