Search

Your search keyword '"Balugani, R"' showing total 5 results
Start Over Author "Balugani, R"
5 results on '"Balugani, R"'

3. Development and validation of a patient self-assessed questionnaire on satisfaction with communication of the multiple sclerosis diagnosis

Author

Solari, A, Mattarozzi, K, Vignatelli, L, Giordano, A, Russo, P, Messmeruccelli, M, D'Alessandro, R, Pucci, E, Martinelli, V, Uccelli, Mm, Borreani, C, Trojano, M, Heesen, C, Mancardi, Gl, Milanese, C, Galimberti, S, Calabrese, D, Ferrari, G, Confalonieri, P, Mantegazza, R, Maggi, L, Colombo, B, Esposito, F, Moiola, L, Rodegher, M, Radaelli, M, Granella, F, Immovilli, P, Dalla Bella, E, Lugaresi, A, De Luca, G, Mattoscio, M, Di Ioia, M, Travaglini, D, Farina, D, Zimatore, G, Plasmati, I, Tortorella, C, Orsolamalpighi, S, Guidolin, L, Leone, M, Motti, L, Tola, Mr, Montanari, E, Guareschi, A, Pesci, I, Pattini, M, Feo, C, Torricelli, L, Santangelo, M, Stecchi, S, Scandellari, C, Balugani, R, La Mola, L, Montagna, P, Pizza, F, Avoni, P, Baldin, E, Delaj, L, Rinaldi, R, Baldi, E, Caniatti, L, Milani, P, Mussuto, V, Manzoni, M, Casmiro, M, Fiorani, L, Galeotti, M, Guerrini, C, Neri, W, Mambelli, L, Malagù, S, Naldi, P, Calzoni, S, Collimedaglia, L, Pietrolongo, E, Di Tommaso, V, Pace, M, Benedetti, M, Rossi, F, Pastoretrossello, M, Faccioli, L, Spinardi, L., Solari A., Mattarozzi K., Vignatelli L., Giordano A., Russo P.M., Uccelli M.M., D'Alessandro R., Montagna P., Pizza F., Avoni P., Baldin E., Delaj L., SIMS-Trial group, and GERONIMUS group.

Subjects
Questionnaires, Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis, Psychometrics, Adolescent, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cognition, physiology, Communication, Disease Progression, Early Diagnosis, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, psychology, Patient Satisfaction, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Newly diagnosed, psychology, Young Adult, Patient satisfaction, DIAGNOSIS COMMUNICATION, Cognition, Surveys and Questionnaires, medicine, Humans, Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Physician-Patient Relations, PSYCHOMETRICS, business.industry, Multiple sclerosis, Communication, Reproducibility of Results, Statistical, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Surgery, Clinical trial, Early Diagnosis, Patient Satisfaction, physiology, PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, Physical therapy, Disease Progression, Female, Neurology (clinical), business, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Factor Analysis
Abstract

Background: We describe the development and clinical validation of a patient self-administered tool assessing the quality of multiple sclerosis diagnosis disclosure. Method: A multiple sclerosis expert panel generated questionnaire items from the Doctor’s Interpersonal Skills Questionnaire, literature review, and interviews with neurology inpatients. The resulting 19-item Comunicazione medico-paziente nella Sclerosi Multipla (COSM) was pilot tested/debriefed on seven patients with multiple sclerosis and administered to 80 patients newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. The resulting revised 20-item version (COSM-R) was debriefed on five patients with multiple sclerosis, field tested/debriefed on multiple sclerosis patients, and field tested on 105 patients newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis participating in a clinical trial on an information aid. The hypothesized monofactorial structure of COSM-R section 2 was tested on the latter two groups. Results: The questionnaire was well accepted. Scaling assumptions were satisfactory in terms of score distributions, item—total correlations and internal consistency. Factor analysis confirmed section 2’s monofactorial structure, which was also test—retest reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.73; 95% CI 0.54—0.85). Section 1 had only fair test—retest reliability (ICC 0.45; 95% CI 0.12—0.69), and three items had 8—21% missed responses. Conclusions: COSM-R is a brief, easy-to-interpret MS-specific questionnaire for use as a health care indicator.

Published
2010

5. Hypnobehavioral and hypnoenergetic therapy in the treatment of obese women: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.

Author

Gelo OC, Zips A, Ponocny-Seliger E, Neumann K, Balugani R, and Gold C

Subjects
Acupressure, Adult, Aged, Body Image, Combined Modality Therapy, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Weight Loss, Behavior Therapy methods, Hypnosis methods, Obesity therapy, Psychotherapy methods
Abstract

This study compared the effectiveness of hypnobehavioral therapy (HypBe) and HypBe enhanced by elements of energetic psychotherapy (hypnoenergetic therapy, HypEn) for obese women. Sixty clients were randomized to either HypBe or HypEn. Body weight, BMI, eating behavior, and body concept were assessed at baseline, posttreatment, and at a follow-up. Mixed ANOVA models and effect sizes were used for statistics. Both treatments improved weight, BMI, eating behavior, and some aspects of body concept. Improvements in eating behavior and body concept were higher for those who also lost weight (responders). Weight and BMI reductions were not significantly different for the HypEn versus HypBe groups at follow-up.

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results