Search

By exploring commoning for the last years, I came to identify different collective narratives that make us perpetuate suffering. 1. The myth of scarcity. This is brought by a dysfunctionnal economy of strokes (Steiner 1971), that means that we learn to search for recognition of the authority, rather than to give and get recognition to and from our peers, which then creates abundance. 2. The myth of competition. The fear of lacking resources brings competition. As we are not in peace within ourselves, we built a socio-legal framework that foster competition and pseudo-rationalism (Capra and Mattei 2015), that is war against those deemed different. 3. The myth of the state and the market. Ignorant of our individual and collective capacities, we rely on external authorities to make decisions for us. Hence we come to believe that companies create jobs, and the state provides us with a safety net. In reality, companies and the state only exist because they extract value from the multitude, in the form of the collective intelligence brought, or taxes for example (Dardot and Laval 2014; Rushkoff, 2019). 4. The myth of materiality. Once aware of these myths, we can explore new avenues through the alliance of play, arts, and meditation for example (Winnicott 2005; Jung 1963; Goenka 2020).

Presentation for the defence of my PhD thesis in the Individualized program in Social Science at Concordia University. Read the thesis abstract preprint.

Systemic transformations are needed to prevent the consequences of human-led damage to Earth’s ecosystems. In contrast to the state-led approach to global health security, a planetary health solidarity initiative takes a cross-border and transdisciplinary approach led by citizens across the globe. It emphasises a sovereign, cosmo-local valuation of our well-being and health (promotion, prevention and regeneration), and relies on building trust and confidence to foster collective and individual resilience. This should, by design, increase embodied solidarity across humans, and foster the cohabitation of plural perspectives and practices. A coalition of diverse people from around the world are committed to promoting planetary health, developing a bottom-up proposal: The Planetary Health Solidarity Initiative. Rather than relying solely on government or institutional actors to lead the way, this initiative seeks to leverage the commons, collective knowledge, creativity, and energy of converging glocal communities networks. En français, Event postponed to June 22, 2023.

الجمع بين التكنولوجيات و المعارف الطبية يساهم في ضمان افضل الطرق للرعاية و تقاسم التكاليف و خلق مواطن شغل محلية ٢٠ شهادة في مهرجان - لنعتن بعضنا البعض English — 中文 — हिंदी — Español — Français – বাংলা — Pусский — Português — Deutsch www.openvillage.ch :أشرطة فيديو طبعة 2020: تكنولوجيا الصحة ذات الملكية المشتركة : موثوقة، متاحة وقابلة للتكّيُف

Des transformations systémiques sont nécessaires pour prévenir les conséquences des dommages causés par l'humain aux écosystèmes de la Terre. Contrairement à l'approche étatique de sécurité sanitaire mondiale, une initiative de santé planétaire solidarité adopte une approche transfrontalière et transdisciplinaire menée par des citoyens de par le monde. Elle met l'accent sur une valorisation souveraine, cosmo-locale de notre bien-être et de notre santé (promotion, prévention et régénération) et s'appuie sur l'instauration d'un climat de confiance pour favoriser une résilience collective et individuelle. Cette approche devrait, de par sa conception, accroître une solidarité incorporée entre humains, et favoriser la cohabitation de perspectives et de pratiques plurielles. Une coalition de personnes diverses de par le monde s'engage à promouvoir la santé planétaire, en élaborant une proposition bottom-up : l'Initiative de solidarité pour la santé planétaire. Plutôt que de s’appuyer uniquement sur les gouvernements ou acteurs institutionnels pour montrer la voie, cette initiative cherche à tirer parti des communs, des connaissances collectives, de la créativité et de l'énergie des réseaux de communautés glocales qui convergent. In English, Evénement reporté au 22 juin 2023.

पूलिंग तकनीक और चिकित्सीय ज्ञान बेहतर देख-रेख, कम लागत और स्थानीय रोजगार उपलब्ध कराता है। 20 प्रशंसा पत्र, पर्व - ‘एकसाथ देखभाल’। संतुष्ट: दृष्टि ; स्वास्थ्य में तकनीकी स्वतंत्रता ; स्वास्थ्य कॉमन्स ; कथा चिकित्सा ; हमारे मानसिक स्वास्थ्य का संरक्षण ; हमारी पृथ्वी, हमारा स्वास्थ्य ; गमनीय कार्यशाला ; विधायी रंगमंच ; उपचार की कलाएँ ; साझा मंडली ; प्रभाव। English — 中文 — Español — Français — العربية – বাংলা — Pусский — Português — Deutsch वीडियो: www.openvillage.ch – 2020 संस्करण: आमजन-स्वामित्व के रूप में स्वास्थ्य प्रौद्योगिकी: विश्वसनीय, अनुकूल एवं किफ़ायती, फ़ाइल प्रिंट (300 डीपीआई, 61 एमबी) और डिजिटल (72 डीपीआई, 12 एमबी) गुणवत्ता में उपलब्ध है।

汇集技术和医学知识可以确保更好的护理,分担成本并创造当地的就业机会。20条证言,“让我们一起照顾”节日。 内容: 目标:疗愈团体 ; 自由健康技术 ; 健康共享 ; 叙事医学 ; 保护我们的心理健康 ; 我们的星球、我们的健康 ; 步行研讨会 ; 立法剧院 ; 治愈的艺术 ; 分享圈子 ; 影响。 English — हिंदी — Español — Français — العربية – বাংলা — Pусский — Português — Deutsch 影片: www.openvillage.ch – 2020 版: 公有制下的健康科技: 可信赖, 可负担, 可适应, 提供印刷(300 dpi,61 MB)和数字(72 dpi,12 MB)质量的文件。

Two dynamics are often found in large groups. One is conferences, forums, congresses, symposiums and conventions; the other is hackathons, open forums, open cafes, unconferences and game jams. Unfortunately, these dynamics do not encourage the emergence of a common project. A third way is to co-create, out of individual realities, a common content. The commitment of each individual makes it possible to achieve a common result, while preserving the collective energy. This document presents six steps for creating such a dynamic. Version française

A combinação de tecnologias e conhecimentos médicos garante melhores cuidados, divide custos e cria empregos locais. 20 depoimentos, festival 'vamos cuidar juntos'. Conteúdo : Visão ; "Free technology" em saúde ; Comums de saúde ; Medicina narrativa ; Preservar nossa saúde mental ; Nosso planeta, nossa saúde ; Walkshops ; Teatro legislativo ; Arte para curar ; Círculos de partilhas ; Impacto. English — 中文 — हिंदी — Español — Français — العربية – বাংলা — Pусский — Deutsch Vídeos: www.openvillage.ch – Edição 2020: A tecnologia de saúde como comuns: confiável, acessível, adaptável, Ficheiro disponível em qualidade de impressão (300 dpi, 61 MB) e digital (72 dpi, 12 MB).

Объединение технологий и медицинских знаний обеспечивает лучший уход, снижает затраты и создает рабочие места на местном уровне. 20 отзывов, фестиваль «Заботимся вместе». Содержание : Видение: Исцеляющие коллективы ; бесплатные технологии в здравоохранении ; Общественные блага в области здравоохранения ; Слушающая медицина ; Сохранение нашего психического здоровья ; Наша планета, наше здоровье ; Мастер-классы «на прогулке»; Законодательный театр ; Искусство для исцеления ; Круги обмена ; Воздействие. English — 中文 — हिंदी — Español — Français — العربية – বাংলা — Português — Deutsch Видео: www.openvillage.ch – издание 2020 г.: Технологии здравоохранения для всех: надежные, доступные, адаптивные, Файл доступен в печатном (300 dpi, 61 МБ) и цифровом (72 dpi, 12 МБ) качестве.

Version française. Ever since I was young, I have sought to find how to contribute meaningfully to the community, while being fully myself. Called to different interests than my peers, I began to explore the mysteries of group dynamics. Many cycles of study and practice led me to an awareness: suffering, misery (physical and spiritual), violence, are often generated by stories we learn as children, and pass on through generations. I became convinced that, within months, we could ensure that all people could live decently and in harmony, if we dared to listen – literally and symbolically – to our Heart, to the Other’s. We would commit ourselves to a path that celebrates our Humanity, connects us to Nature within and beyond, and nourishes our Souls. Indeed, tackling complex, wicked challenges requires abandoning the logic of a machine-body, the illusion of technical solutions built without personal commitment, so that we can raise our collective, human consciousness. This means providing ways for the whole population to listen to their different realities, and to quickly reach a popular consensus on how to overcome these challenges in ways that strengthen solidarity. According to the creator of Captcha tests [1], a million people could translate Wikipedia into a new language in 80 hours. Let us imagine what such a group could achieve if they had the capacity to sincerely agree on essential common projects, and implement them in a matter of days – free/libre and open source knowledge and infrastructures that could easily be adopted, reproduced and enriched across territories? * * * This five-part thesis documents six years of intense creation and research that enabled me to design how such a process could unfold. First, I present my journey to the PhD, and how my research took shape through cycles of prototyping. I introduce the idea of the commons, which is to understand that people – not corporations or the state – have all the resources needed to overcome the challenges we face. This builds on the oeuvre of Elinor Ostrom [2], who showed that ordinary people can self-organise efficiently to preserve resources, and Stefano Rodotà [3], who pledged that any resource that meets basic needs must be managed in a participatory way, regardless of who owns it. ./. Secondly, I talk about Breathing Games [4], a commons I co-founded to make respiratory health fun. I show how this initiative, which initially objectified the children concerned – by thinking their health in their place –, then opened up a space for young people to share their subjective experience in a playful way that was beneficial to their peers. I share how an ethic and aesthetic of commoning enabled us to engage over 450 volunteers, and mutualise resources from Canada, Switzerland, France, Italy, and South Korea. Thirdly, I propose four levers to build solidarity-driven ecosystems. We need to: bring diverse people together for ludic events to overcome loneliness. For example, the online hackathons that mobilised 150,000 people at the start of the crown-crisis [5]. generate collective value to overcome material limitations. For example, the autonomous networks of makers, who shared designs and manufactured over 48 million medical supplies while industry was at a standstill [6]. facilitate agreements across teams of teams to overcome power games. For example, the Emerging Change, developed in Quebec schools and Swiss multinationals, which enables teams to thrive and excel by establishing a ritual dialogue between the whole team and its leader, thus avoiding competition between individuals [7]. revisit collective narratives to break free from self-servitude. For example, challenging the belief that an authority – parent, teacher, employer, politician, caregiver – can take care of our needs better than we can [8]. Fourthly, I present the Geneva festival 'taking care together' [9], a nine-day event created in 122 days thanks to 115 co-hosts. I quantify the collective value created by the Breathing Games and the festival at 2.2 million Swiss francs, 4/5 of which was generated by volunteer contributions. Next, I provide a step-by-step facilitation method that could help thousands of people coordinate their efforts around a limited number of modular projects. I then outline how this model could re-create education, outdate systemic corruption, resurrect democracy, and heal our dis-ease when we over-invest in the mind. Finally, I summarise what I have learnt, and list about 600 references that inspired me. This creation-as-research [10] can be freely reproduced and enriched (CC BY-SA licence, editable LaTeX format). Concordia Salus [11]. _____ Von Ahn L. Massive-scale online collaboration. TEDx CMU 2011. https://www.ted.com/talks/luis_von_ahn_massive_scale_online_collaboration Ostrom E. Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. Nobel Prize lecture 2009. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/ostrom_lecture.pdf Mattei U, Reviglio E, Rodotà S (eds). I beni pubblici : dal governo democratico dell’economia alla riforma del codice civile [Public goods: from democratic economic governance to civil code reform]. Accademia nazionale dei Lincei 2010. http://www.scienzeelettere.it/book/35940.html Balli F, Jeanmaire G, Ibbotson R, Gervais Y, Kellner E, Gingras S, Gaudy T, Tse SM, Bransi M, Chelabi K, Silva-Lavigne N, Pelaez S, Montalbano L, Cilluffo G, la Grutta S, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Mohammad Y. Open-source games for health, multiplayer and gamepads. Co-creating fun care with children with asthma, young adults with cystic fibrosis, elders with COPD. General meeting of the Global Alliance against chronic Respiratory Diseases 2020-2021. Zenodo 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5515638 Balli F. Team-building and information flow for large groups such as online hackathons. Zenodo 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3743244 Open Source Medical Supplies and Nation of Makers. Design, make, protect. A report on the open source maker and manufacturer response to the Covid-19 PPE crisis. 2021. https://opensourcemedicalsupplies.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Design-Make-Protect_21.01.27.pdf Laugeri M. Les clés du dialogue hiérarchique. InterEditions 2015. https://www.dunod.com/sciences-humaines-et-sociales/cles-du-dialogue-hierarchique de la Boétie E. Discours de la servitude volontaire ou Contr’un [Discourse on Voluntary Servitude]. 1530. http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/la_boetie_etienne_de/discours_de_la_servitude/discours_servitude.html Balli F. Preserving our health: a common heritage. Festival 'prenons soin ensemble' (festival 'Taking care together'). Zenodo 2023. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7833388 Chapman OB, Sawchuk K. Research-Creation: Intervention, Analysis and "Family Resemblances". Canadian Journal of Communication 2012; 37(1). https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2012v37n1a2489 Concordia Salus, which means Salvation through a state of peaceful agreement, is the motto of Concordia University, and of the city of Tio'tia:ke / Montreal., Thesis submitted. Defence soon. The link to the thesis will be updated in the Fall 2023.

English version. Depuis le plus jeune âge, j'ai cherché comment contribuer utilement à la communauté, tout en étant pleinement moi-même. Appelé à des intérêts différents de ceux de mes pairs, j'ai commencé à explorer les mystères de la dynamique de groupe. De nombreux cycles d'étude et de pratique m'ont conduit à une prise de conscience : la souffrance, la misère (physique et spirituelle), la violence, sont souvent générées par des histoires que nous apprenons dans notre enfance, et que nous transmettons de génération en génération. J'ai ainsi acquis la conviction que, en quelques mois, nous pourrions assurer que tous les humains vivent dignement et en harmonie, si nous osions écouter – littéralement et symboliquement – notre Cœur, celui de l’Autre. Nous nous engagerions alors dans un voyage qui célèbre notre Humanité, relie la Nature en nous et au-delà, nourrit nos âmes. De fait, relever des défis complexes requiert d’abandonner la logique d'un corps-machine, l’illusion de solutions techniques conçues sans engagement personnel, pour élever notre conscience collective, humaine. Cela veut dire fournir des moyens à l’ensemble de la population d'écouter leurs différentes réalités, et leur permettre de parvenir rapidement à un consensus populaire sur la façon de surmonter ces défis de manière à renforcer la solidarité. Selon le créateur des tests Captcha, [1] un million de personnes pourraient traduire Wikipédia dans une nouvelle langue en 80 heures. Imaginons alors ce qu'un tel groupe pourrait réaliser s'il avait la capacité de s'accorder sincèrement sur des projets communs essentiels et de les mettre en œuvre en quelques jours – des connaissances et infrastructures libres et en source ouverte qui pourraient facilement être adoptées, reproduites et enrichies à travers les territoires ? * * * Cette thèse en cinq parties documente six années de création et de recherche intenses qui m'ont permis de concevoir le déploiement d'un tel processus. Premièrement, je présente mon parcours jusqu'au doctorat, et comment ma recherche a pris forme au fil des prototypes. J'introduis l'idée des communs, qui consiste à comprendre que les personnes – et non les entreprises ou l'État – disposent de toutes les ressources nécessaires pour surmonter les défis auxquels nous sommes confrontés. Cette idée s'appuie sur l'œuvre d'Elinor Ostrom [2], qui a montré que les gens ordinaires peuvent s'auto-organiser efficacement pour préserver les ressources, et de Stefano Rodotà [3], qui s'est engagé pour que toute ressource satisfaisant des besoins fondamentaux soit gérée de manière participative, quel que soit son propriétaire. Deuxièmement, je raconte Breathing Games [4], un commun que j'ai co-fondé pour rendre la santé respiratoire amusante. Je montre comment cette initiative, qui a d'abord objectivé les enfants concernés – en pensant leur santé à leur place –, a ensuite ouvert un espace permettant aux jeunes de raconter leur vécu subjectif de manière ludique et utile à leurs pairs. Je partage comment une éthique et une esthétique de commoning nous a permis d'engager plus de 450 volontaires et de mutualiser des ressources provenant du Canada, de Suisse, de France, d'Italie et de Corée du Sud. Troisièmement, je propose quatre leviers pour bâtir des écosystèmes solidaires. Nous devons : réunir des personnes diverses lors d'événements ludiques afin de vaincre la solitude. Par exemple, les hackathons en ligne qui ont mobilisé 150’000 personnes au début de la crise de la couronne [5]. générer de la valeur collective pour surmonter les limitations matérielles. Par exemple, les réseaux autonomes de makers, qui ont partagé des designs et fabriqué plus de 48 millions de fournitures médicales alors que l'industrie était à l'arrêt [6]. faciliter des accords entre équipes d’équipes pour surmonter les jeux de pouvoir. Par exemple, le Changement Émergent, développé dans des écoles québécoises et des multinationales suisses, permet aux équipes de s’épanouir et d'exceller, en établissant un dialogue rituel entre l'équipe complète et son leader, ce qui évite la compétition entre individus [7]. revisiter les récits collectifs pour se libérer de l’auto-servitude. Par exemple, questionner la croyance selon laquelle une autorité – parent, enseignant, employeur, politicien, soignant – saurait prendre soin de nos besoins mieux que nous-même [8]. Quatrièmement, je présente le festival genevois 'prenons soin ensemble' [9], un événement de neuf jours créé en 122 jours grâce à 115 co-hôtes. Je quantifie la valeur collective créée par Breathing Games et le festival à 2,2 millions de francs suisses, dont 4/5 ont été générés par des contributions bénévoles. Je propose ensuite une méthode de facilitation étape par étape qui pourrait aider des milliers de personnes à coordonner leurs efforts autour d'un nombre restreint de projets modulaires. Je décris comment ce modèle pourrait re-créer l’éducation, mettre fin à la corruption systémique, faire renaître la démocratie et guérir notre mal-à-dire lorsque l’on surinvestit le mental. Enfin, je résume mes apprentissages, et liste quelque 600 références qui m'ont inspiré. Cette création-comme-recherche [10] peut être librement reproduite et enrichie (licence Creative Commons BY-SA, format LaTeX éditable). Concordia Salus [11]. _____ Von Ahn L. Massive-scale online collaboration [Collaboration en ligne à large échelle]. TEDx CMU 2011. https://www.ted.com/talks/luis_von_ahn_massive_scale_online_collaboration Ostrom E. Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems [Au-delà des marchés et des États : la gouvernance polycentrique des systèmes économiques complexes]. Conférence du Prix Nobel 2009. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/ostrom_lecture.pdf Mattei U, Reviglio E, Rodotà S (eds). I beni pubblici : dal governo democratico dell’economia alla riforma del codice civile [Les biens publics : de la gouvernance économique démocratique à la réforme du code civil]. Accademia nazionale dei Lincei 2010. http://www.scienzeelettere.it/book/35940.html Balli F, Jeanmaire G, Ibbotson R, Gervais Y, Kellner E, Gingras S, Gaudy T, Tse SM, Bransi M, Chelabi K, Silva-Lavigne N, Pelaez S, Montalbano L, Cilluffo G, la Grutta S, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Mohammad Y. Open-source games for health, multiplayer and gamepads. Co-creating fun care with children with asthma, young adults with cystic fibrosis, elders with COPD [Jeux libres pour la santé, multijoueur et manettes de jeu. Co-créer des soins ludiques pour les enfants asthmatiques, les jeunes adultes atteints de mucoviscidose et les personnes âgées souffrant de BPCO]. Assemblée générale de l’Alliance mondiale contre les affections respiratoires chroniques 2020-2021. Zenodo 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5515638 Balli F. Team-building and information flow for large groups such as online hackathons [Team building et flux d'informations pour les grands groupes, tels que les hackathons en ligne]. Zenodo 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3743244 Open Source Medical Supplies and Nation of Makers. Design, make, protect. A report on the open source maker and manufacturer response to the Covid-19 PPE crisis [Concevoir, fabriquer, protéger. Un rapport sur la réponse des makers et fabricants open-source à la crise d’EPI Covid-19]. 2021. https://opensourcemedicalsupplies.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Design-Make-Protect_21.01.27.pdf Laugeri M. Les clés du dialogue hiérarchique. InterEditions 2015. https://www.dunod.com/sciences-humaines-et-sociales/cles-du-dialogue-hierarchique de la Boétie E. Discours de la servitude volontaire ou Contr’un. 1530. http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/la_boetie_etienne_de/discours_de_la_servitude/discours_servitude.html Balli F. Préserver notre santé : un héritage commun. Festival 'prenons soin ensemble'. Zenodo 2023. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7833396 Chapman OB, Sawchuk K. Research-Creation: Intervention, Analysis and "Family Resemblances" [Recherche-création : intervention, analyse et "airs de famille"]. Canadian Journal of Communication 2012; 37(1). https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2012v37n1a2489 Concordia Salus, qui signifie Le salut par l’union pacifique des cœurs, est la devise de l’Université Concordia et de la ville de Tio'tia:ke / Montréal., Thèse déposée. Défense prochaine. Le lien vers la thèse sera mis à jour à l'automne 2023.

To pool health knowledge and technologies ensures better care, divides costs and creates local employment. 20 testimonials, festival 'Taking care together'. Content: Vision; Free/libre technologies in health; Health commons; Listening medicine; Preserving our mental health; Our planet, our health; Walkshops; "Legislative Theatre"; Arts for healing; Sharing Circles; Impact. 中文 — हिंदी — Español — Français — العربية – বাংলা — Pусский — Português — Deutsch Videos: www.openvillage.ch – Edition 2020: Health technology as commons: trustable, affordable, adaptable, File available in print (300 dpi, 61 MB) and digital (72 dpi, 12 MB) quality.

Unificar tecnologias y conocimientos sanitarios garantiza mejor atencion, compartir gastos y crear empleos locales. 20 testimonios, festival 'cuidémonos juntos'. Contenido: Visión; Tecnologías abiertas en sanidad; Salud como común; Medicina de escucha; Preservar nuestra salud mental; Nuestro planeta, nuestra salud; Walkshops; Teatro legislativo; Arte para curar; Círculos de intercambio; Impacto. English — 中文 — हिंदी — Français — العربية – বাংলা — Pусский — Português — Deutsch Vídeos: www.openvillage.ch – Edición 2020: La tecnología de la salud como común: confiable, asequible, adaptable, Archivo disponible en calidad impresa (300 dpi, 61 MB) y digital (72 dpi, 12 MB).

"Ever since I was young, I have been searching for a way to make a meaningful contribution to the community while being fully myself. Called to different interests than my peers, I began to explore the mysteries of group dynamics. Many cycles of study and practice led me to an awareness: suffering, misery (physical and spiritual), violence, are often generated by stories we learn as children, and pass on through generations. I became convinced that, if we dared to listen – literally and symbolically – to our hearts, to the heart of the Other, we could, within months, ensure that all people could live in dignity and harmony. We would commit ourselves to a path that celebrates our Humanity, connects us to Nature within and beyond, and nourishes our Souls." [1] These few lines are the story of a personal journey. A journey inspired by pioneers of Commoning [2, 3] and nourished by walking alongside my soul sister. A journey made possible by the unwavering support of my parents, and four professors, who embraced the madness of their student. A journey of love and hate relationship with an institution that summoned me to its academic tribunal and simultaneously awarded me the title of "Engaged Scholar". A journey in which learning, research questions and methodologies served as tools to transcend them, and emancipate from the flaws rooted in academic discipline, in any scientific research. [4] A journey that unfolded thanks to a programme that values autonomy, [5] antidisciplinarity, [6] and multirationality [7]. What if such a programme became the standard for doctoral studies? What if students started to build congruent projects that benefit the whole community? If just ten doctoral students joined forces to build a commons, they would have created a collective value of $1.2 million by the end of their studies... [8] Balli F. HEALING COMMUNITIES. What if we collectively had the capacity to overcome any crisis in a matter of days? A method for teams of teams to: listen to each other, agree on priorities, put in commons resources, create few but essential and freely adaptable solutions. Thesis submitted. To be released at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5007168 Lauger M. Emerging Change: a new Transactional Analysis frame for effective dialogue at work. Transactional Analysis Journal 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/03621537.2020.1726660 Frangos M, Pearce HM, Brastaviceanu T, Mahmoud AA, Khalid A. Democratising design in scientific innovation: Application of an open value network to open source hardware design. Cumulus Working Papers 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3331281 Capra F, Mattei. The Ecology of Law: Toward a legal system in tune with Nature and Community. Berrett-Koehler 2015. https://www.bkconnection.com/books/title/the-ecology-of-law Berne E. What do you say after you say hello?: The psychology of human destiny. Grove Press 1972. https://ericberne.com/what-do-you-say-after-you-say-hello/ Ito J. The Antidisciplinary Approach. Research-Technology Management 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2017.1373047 Gelinas A. Evaluation et multirationalité. Des pratiques évaluatives 1984 https://cap.banq.qc.ca/notice?id=p%3A%3Ausmarcdef_0000017356& locale=fr 10 people x 90 credits x 45 hours x $ 30 (minimal hourly rate for doctoral students) = $ 1,215,000

Between March and May 2022,IASC Europe & CISin collaboration with the Institute of Social Anthropology hosted a colloquium series featuring presentations by international speakers. Thematically, the presentations within the series were dedicated topolicy issues related to the commonsandbringing on the one hand, the commons knowledge and on the other hand, policy and practice closerin Europe & CIS and beyond. Seven themes were used to be presented in relation to policies: urban commons, European agrarian commons, implementation of commons policies, health commons, digital commons and the SDGs and the commons. Background for the colloquium was the fact that at the moment many policies related to agrarian subsidies, sustainable development goals, biodiversity protection,energy strategies,land use planning etc.are being discussed in Europe and CISon national oron EU and other respective supranational levels. Europe and CIS is also closely linked to development policies in other regions through its active role in bilateral and global processes. Some of these policies are already onthe way to be implemented bygovernments. Many of these issues are closely related to the commons but this is often notmentioned. Despite Ostrom's work, the commons are not an issue in these policies although highly relevant, especially when it comes to the issue of commonproperty and commoners’ interests.The presentation addressed these issues and discussions were focused on how this could be changed: Commons and Polycentric Governance within and across cities by Chagas Cavalcanti AR (and Roggero M) The European commons: The “great absent” in the EU agri-food and agri-environmental policy making by Manzoni A, Diaz-Maroto IJ, Bogataj N Water as commons in undemocratic postcolonial South by Putri P Success and failures in policy implementation – Methodological questions and sharing goals with commoners by Micciarelli G (and Mendez P) Health and law-making: re-creating collective narratives by Balli F, Carpentier P Is the digital economy market-driven or commons-based? Lessons for EU digital strategy by Pazaitis A, Kostakis V SDGs and the commons: from a central missing topic towards recognition via national implementations? by Haller T, Soliev I

On retrouve souvent deux dynamiques dans les grands groupes. D'une part les conférences, forums, congrès, symposiums, conventions ; d'autre part les hackathons, forum ouverts, open cafés, unconferences, game jams. Malheureusement, ces dynamiques ne favorisent pas l’émergence d’un projet commun. Une troisième voie permet de co-créer, à partir des réalités individuelles, un contenu commun. L’engagement de chacun⋅e permet d’atteindre un résultat partagé, en préservant l’énergie unie. Ce document présente six étapes pour mettre en place une telle dynamique. English version

This report is the main output of a scientific exchange among a group of 10 Swiss and International scholars who have been drafting a roadmap for Open Education in the Swiss Higher Education landscape. The roadmap is organised around 3 main strategic focuses and each focus is detailed in 4 actions: Focus 1: Broad horizon education; Focus 2: Ethical and responsible use of technology; Focus 3: Humans reconnected to the planet’s ecosystem. This work stems from i) a Delphi study with worldwide Open Education experts; ii) two workshops held during Open Education events – the Open Education Global Conference and the Swiss Open Education Day; iii) 9 months of work and, iv) a vision exercice, projecting the kind of education we would like in 50 years. Stakeholders, citizens and communities are invited to join and actively contribute to the discussion through the interactive version of the roadmap, https://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/Open_Education_Roadmap .

Aatelier organisé par l'Association Aura, qui conçoit un dispositif connecté pour permettre aux personnes vivant avec de l'épilepsie et/ou à leurs proches-aidants de détecter l'arrivée des crises et être alertées en amont. Documentation complète. ------ Introduction, 5 min. Accueil. Le solutionnisme technologique selon Morozov.[1][2][3][4] Citation d'Evgeny Morozov. Principes : participation active, échange d'idées, accueillir une pluralité de perspectives comme ouverture (cercle magique). Tour de table, 10 min. Prénom. Mon ressenti actuel est (ensoleillé, nuageux, ...). Si j'étais une technologie je serais (adjectif). Cercle sur la souveraineté, 20 min. Après une brève présentation des trois thèmes (2 min), nous répartirons en trois groupes qui aborderont chacun un thème pour arriver à un consensus sur trois éléments clé en lien avec la souveraineté (9 min). Une personne par groupe fera ensuite un retour en plénière (1 min par groupe). Ces retours seront suivis d'une contribution de l'animateur (6 min). Education – Souveraineté et technologie: formation en ligne par un enseignant mort[5] vs sessions dialogiques[6] Alimentation – Souveraineté et technologie: vision promue par le World Economic Forum[7] ou par le groupe ETC[8] Justice – Souveraineté et technologie: Facebook Oversight Board[9] vs Pouvoir plébéien[10] Cercle sur le médical, 20 min. Sur le même principe, nous formerons un deuxième cercle, pour réfléchir de façon critique et constructive aux narratifs autour du patch Aura.[11] Données et vie privée – Quels enjeux dans la collecte de données par le patch (ex. dossier patient numérique)[12][13] Récits personnel et collectif – Le patch contribue-t-il à une meilleure écoute de soi?[14][15] Discussion ouverte, 25 min

Presentation done as finalists of the Seoul Citypreneurs contest 2019 co-organized by the World Federation of United Nations Associations and the City of Seoul. Air pollution reduces our life expectancy by 20 months. We make respiratory health enjoyable, accessible and freely adaptable by collectively creating games and devices to foster self and mutual care. Let's ensure everyone can afford a healthy and decent life! Urban issues addressed: excluding economy, air pollution, chronic respiratory diseases Impact investment themes: open science / commons, community empowerment, universal access to care

Since childhood, we learn that knowledge does not come from ourselves (schoolchildren), but from 'an omniscient 'master'. When a crisis happens – a disease, a change in our environment – we similarly rely on external authorities, who are usually prompt to provide us with directives. But is this really the most effective way to take care of our very needs, to overcome complex challenges?[1][2][3][4] Can a few really be more knowledgeable than the multitude?[5][6][7][8] Is the centralization of power during an emergency still legitimate when Internet enables thousands of people to put in commons their resources (online hackathons),[9] and to reach decisions within hours (digital democracy)?[10][11][12][13] During this participatory discussion, we will explore the narratives behind 'health' and 'law' policy-making centralization. We will explore how people can reclaim ownership of themselves, control over their medical journey and medical information (e.g. health commons,[14][15] critical public health[16]). We will also discuss how individuals and communities can reclaim the right to elaborate rules that affect them and their coordination (legal commons, democratic constitutionalism[17][18][19][20]). Finally, we will reflect on Elinor Ostrom's statement that "a core goal of public policy should be to facilitate the development of institutions that bring out the best in humans,"[21] and will introduce the work done in other fields such as by legal scholars working on indigenous law (Canada, Switzerland),[22][23] and on changing the law regarding propriety (Italy) with reflections on how this can inspire health commons policy development.[24][25][26]

Play is a natural way to experiment, socialize, learn.Our community invitespeopleto collectively createlibre and open-sourcegames and game controllers to foster mutual and self-care inrespiratory and mental health. We present the evolution ofBreathing Games since its inception in 2014: the commons (principles, UN global goals, organization, contributors, collaboration, funding), events (2014 to now), outcomes (games, hardware, GHF Open Village, research, publications). This is also our communication on progress as signatories of the United Nations Global Compact.

Aims: Fostering the emergence of open science methodologies, knowledge and infrastructures that are co-created and coordinated by the people, and aligned with the objectives, values and principles of the UNESCO Recommendation adopted by 193 states in late 2021. Carrying, valuing and contributing to a coherent set of essential social commons, that is resources whose primary utility is to enable every human being: the fulfilment of their basic needs; the development of their capacity to care; the full enjoyment of their civil and social rights. Building and preserving an information commons under copyfair or copyleft legal regime, or a normative framework of equivalent effect, as well as a movable and immovable heritage governed according to Ostrom principles. Practicing creation-as-research: research emerging from creative activities. Illustration of Open Science elements according to UNESCO Illustration presenting the positioning of the foundation Insert on the founder's journey Contact email Version française. Annex under CC BY SA: editable file, improved UNESCO icons (darker colours, uniform sizes), circle integrating the four elements (placement and labels modified).

Buts : Favoriser l�����mergence de m��thodologies, connaissances et infrastructures de science ouverte co-cr����es et coordonn��es par la population, et align��es sur les objectifs, valeurs et principes de la Recommandation de l���UNESCO adopt��e par 193 ��tats fin 2021. Porter, valoriser et contribuer �� un ensemble coh��rent de communs sociaux essentiels, soit des ressources dont l'utilit�� premi��re est de permettre �� chaque humain : la r��alisation de ses besoins fondamentaux ; le d��veloppement de ses capacit��s �� prendre soin ; la pleine jouissance de ses droits civils et sociaux. Constituer et pr��server un patrimoine informationnel plac�� sous r��gime juridique copyfair ou copyleft, ou cadre normatif d'effets ��quivalents, et un patrimoine mobilier et immobilier gouvern�� selon les principes d���Ostrom. Pratiquer la cr��ation-comme-recherche : recherche ��mergent d���activit��s cr��atives. Illustration pr��sentant les ��l��ments de la science ouverte selon l���UNESCO Illustration pr��sentant le positionnement de la fondation Encart sur le parcours du fondateur Courriel de contact English version. Annexe sous CC BY SA : fichiers ��ditable, ic��nes UNESCO am��lior��s (couleurs plus fonc��es, uniformisation des tailles), cercle int��grant les quatre ��l��ments (placement et ��tiquettes modifi��es).

Today, six humans in ten have no access to medical care or do not adhere to it. Achieving collective health requires a mindset shift from competitive models creating dependency (medtech business) to solidarity-driven models building communal capacity (health commons). Here, we present 15 initiatives created by open networks of interdisciplinary contributors (peer production); who iteratively co-create and document projects (agile development) that can be freely used, repaired, studied, reproduced and adapted by communities (libre and open-source licences) at fair prices or no cost. As resources are mutualized to avoid redundancies, costs can be cut by ten to hundred times in comparison to IP-driven models. Such commons also foster local capacity building, as various communities can take responsibility to validate, produce and distribute the projects (crowd/peer production). Disease management: valve for mask (Isinnova Charlotte), oxygen concentrator (M19 O2), ventilation machine (OpenVent), ventilator co-design platform (Polyvent), genetic material development (OpenPCR), repurposing vaccines (OSPF OpenVax), repurposing treatments (DNDi AntiCov). Disease prevention: hand rub (Geneva Hand Hygiene Model), Pulmonary Toolkit – 3D lung modeling (Pulmonary Toolkit), transparent mask (BEclear), air quality sensor (LogAir), digital health ecosystem (GNU Health). Health promotion: fun respiratory care (Breathing Games), traditional medicine (CEMI), social support network (Art Hives). Editable version

6 em cada 10 humanos ainda n��o t��m acesso aos cuidados, ou n��o aderem a eles, apesar do aumento dos investimentos. Rub e WikiMed �� base de ��lcool ilustram como a cria����o de equipamentos e softwares reproduz��veis gratuitamente com as comunidades pode: salvar milh��es de vidas, aumentar a integridade, cortar custos em 90%. O cuidado orientado pela coopera����o �� a ��nica maneira de cumprir a agenda 2030 a tempo: sa��de para todos. Apresentamos nove alternativas para o modelo dominante de inova����o excluindo propriet��rio, impulsionar o desenvolvimento para uma sociedade respons��vel e solid��ria. Tamb��m discutimos envelhecimento, pol��ticas p��blicas, sistemas de qualidade e criptomoedas. English ��� Fran��ais ��� Espa��ol ��� �������������� ��� ������ ��� ��������������� ��� ��������������� ��� �������������� Arquivo edit��vel .odp inclu��do.

6 humains sur 10 n'ont pas acc��s ou n'adh��rent pas aux soins, malgr�� les investissements. Le d��sinfectant pour les mains et WikiMed illustrent que la cr��ation avec les communaut��s d'��quipements et logiciels librement reproductibles peut : sauver des millions de vies, accro��tre l'int��grit��, r��duire les co��ts de 90%. Coop��rer est le seul moyen de r��aliser �� temps l'agenda 2030 : la sant�� pour tou��te��s. Nous pr��sentons neuf alternatives �� l'innovation exclusive, pour une soci��t�� responsable et solidaire. Nous discutons aussi de vieillissement, politiques publiques, syst��mes qualit��, cryptomonnaies. English ��� Espa��ol ��� Portugu��s ��� �������������� ��� ������ ��� ��������������� ��� ��������������� ��� �������������� Fichier ��ditable .odp inclus.

6 de cada 10 humanos todav��a no tienen acceso a la atenci��n o no la cumplen, a pesar del aumento de las inversiones. El desinfectante para manos a base de alcohol y WikiMed ilustran c��mo la creaci��n de equipos y software libremente reproducibles con las comunidades puede: salvar millones de vidas, aumentar la integridad, reducir los costos en un 90%. La atenci��n impulsada por la cooperaci��n es la ��nica forma de hacer realidad la agenda 2030 a tiempo: salud para todos. Presentamos nueve alternativas al modelo dominante de innovaci��n excluyente patentada, impulsar el desarrollo hacia una sociedad solidaria y responsable. Tambi��n discutimos el envejecimiento, las pol��ticas p��blicas, la calidad y las criptomonedas. English ��� Fran��ais ��� Portugu��s ��� �������������� ��� ������ ��� ��������������� ��� ��������������� ��� �������������� Archivo editable .odp incluido.

Mise en communs de bonnes pratiques sur comment définir ensemble un but partagé (facilitation), et comment rendre son travail accessible (outils collaboratifs). Version éditable

Without air pollution, our life expectancy would increase by 34 months. With a commons-based economy, each and every human could afford medical care (vs one in two today). How not to produce risks? How to foster mutual care? We, people across regions and disciplines, get engaged to value pluralism and collective wisdom. We embrace play as a natural way to experiment, socialize, learn. We document and share our work so that everyone can freely use, study, improve, adapt it. In traditional medtech, corporate experts build a technical tool to manage a disease. Sealed in a black box, its price make it unaffordable to some. At Breathing Games, volunteer, diverse contributors co-create an evolving, rewarding, immersive story to promote holistic health. Free to use, study, improve, its gratuity helps develop solidarity. We present here our games (Asthma Heroes, Asthmonautes, Rise); controllers (Spirotroller enhanced, Spirotroller gaming, Breathing gamepad); creation as research (game testing, controller testing, games co-creation, translations); our next steps (international study, game accessibility via Raspberry Pi, link to air pollution sensor); and our advocacy activities for health as commons. Poster as video – Editable version – Previous posters at GARD : 2019 – Mutual care taking: collectively creating our respiratory wellbeing with open sciences 2018 – Next-gen advocacy for respiratory health: fun, empowering, participatory, freely adaptable 2017 – When populations care about their respiratory health: a scalable bottom-up model to foster self-care for all

Can ���health��� be imposed to someone without their consent? Is today���s medical research empowering people? Does the scientific culture help us ask (sound) questions? What about taking time to improve how we cooperate? Here, I propose to critically reflect on some of the beliefs embedded in each and every scientific question, and methodology, with some illustrations from medical research as it affects us all. My goal is to raise awareness about ways to improve the trustworthiness, plurality and openness of science. Version en fran��ais, Editable file: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1FBuBDnFSaKlI4Puh1o40z59Hlcv0x7SB48Id4dEm3iI/edit

La ‘santé’ peut-elle être imposée sans consentement ? La recherche médicale améliore-t-elle notre autonomie ? La science aide-t-elle à poser des questions (adéquates) ? Et si nous améliorions notre façon de coopérer ? Je propose ici de réfléchir de manière critique à certaines croyances inhérentes à toute question et méthodologie scientifique, en m'appuyant sur des exemples tirés de la recherche médicale, qui nous concerne toutes et tous. Mon objectif est de sensibiliser aux moyens d'améliorer la fiabilité, la pluralité et l'ouverture de la science. English version, Fichier éditable : https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1F_K50KTr_j7Qztks7wOUhrwhEok2bsBBiDFdKC4e-fs/edit

What about taking time to improve how we cooperate? “Public policy should [...] facilitate the development of institutions that bring out the best in humans,” so Elinor Ostrom. Here, I propose to critically reflect on some of the beliefs embedded in each and every scientific question, and methodology, especially medical research as it affects us all. One goal is to raise awareness about ways to improve the trustworthiness, plurality and openness of science.

In the last months, governments around the world have adopted public policies to promote large-scale vaccination, and covid certificates. Whether such measures are adequate or not has been largely debated. But why have such debates emerged? To this day, alternatives to centralized decision-making have been limitedly discussed. Here, I present how an online platform could help thousands of citizens express their needs (plurality), agree on common priorities (popular consensus), and pool resources to become the protagonists of a common project, like body cells coordinate in real time to preserve life. Building on the commons, on the free/libre and open-source movement (crowdsourcing), on short online events (hackathons), and on a method to coordinate large groups, I sketch how such a platform could help citizens build solidarity-driven solutions during three-day events. Version en français, Newsletter: https://www.houseofcommons.ch – Commentable file: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BiNEdJetmszYp4Qj8-05yuVyzLMvwR-0/ – Editable file: https://houseofcommons.ch/pub/balli_brief_en.odt – Editable visuals: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tEWP54qPZrd-dqYGt3PFj_KsfEEebOhXA3fH2CeKAE0/

Au cours des derniers mois, les gouvernements à travers le monde ont adopté des politiques publiques visant à promouvoir la vaccination et les certificats covid à large échelle. Savoir si ces mesures sont adéquates ou non a été largement débattu. Mais pourquoi de tels débats ont-ils apparu ? À ce jour, des alternatives à une prise de décision centralisée ont été peu discutées. Je présente comment une plateforme web pourrait aider des milliers de citoyens à exprimer leurs besoins (pluralisme), s'accorder sur les priorités partagées (consensus populaire) et mettre en communs leurs ressources pour devenir actrices et acteurs d'un projet collectif, telles les cellules du corps humain se coordonnent en temps réel pour préserver la vie. En me basant sur les communs, sur le mouvement libre et open-source (crowdsourcing), sur de courts événements en ligne (hackathons) et sur une méthode de coordination de grands groupes, j'esquisse comment une telle plateforme pourrait aider les citoyens à construire des solutions solidaires lors d'événements de trois jours. English version, Newsletter: https://www.houseofcommons.ch – Ficher commentable : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lsx7EKTbgpu2DAY-m8UZLp5snQlTXQD9wrv6KcinSmQ/ – Fichier éditable: https://houseofcommons.ch/pub/balli_brief_fr.odt – Visuels éditables : https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tEWP54qPZrd-dqYGt3PFj_KsfEEebOhXA3fH2CeKAE0/

Today, most scientific conferences feature a series of pre-selected experts, who present their achievements (past). Here, I wanted participants to build on their respective, plural experiences, and sketch a common project (future). By forming groups, which I did not attend, I provided a space for participants to actively listen to each other, and value cooperation among peers. Had I join these groups, participants would probably have competed against each other to get recognition from me as the ‘authority’ of this activity. Envisioning public health requires a shift of perspective: believing that health can be thought by a few, without a personal commitment of each individual, without decisions consensually agreed by all, is for me a dangerous myth. This presentation may provide insights towards building a health democracy.

Les ressources qui répondent aux besoins fondamentaux doivent avoir une gouvernance participative, quelque soit leur propriétaire. (Commission Rodotà et Cour suprême italienne s'appuyant sur Elinor Ostrom, prix Nobel). Exemples : le désinfectant open-source pour les mains permettent de sauver 8 millions de vies par an ; les scanners IRM open-source pourraient économiser 60-140 millions € par an rien qu'en Allemagne ; les prothèses en source ouverte mobilisent 30000 bénévoles avec un modèle d’affaires à zéro euro ; l'Open source drug discovery (médicaments en source ouverte) rassemble 110 projets sur les maladies négligées ; les eux pour la santé en source ouverte offrent un modèle ludique pour prendre soin. Cela est vital car : 1) la santé requiert de mettre en communs : 2) cela peut doubler l'accès aux soins ; 3) cela permet de lutter contre la corruption systémique ; 4) les coûts peuvent être divisés par 10 ou 100. Ressources supplémentaires : rappel des définitions (libre et en source ouverte vs gratuit) ; trois étapes pour débuter (objectifs, principes de conception, validation) ; grille d'auto-évaluation (santé, personnes, processus, licences, allocation des ressources, disponibilité physique, impact) ; liens vers un guide pour makers, affiche avec d'autres exemples. English version, Version éditable en anglais sur NextCloud / OnlyOffice: https://cloud.houseofcommons.ch/index.php/s/4tK94nbQMYQBJNo

Resources that fulfill fundamental needs must have a participatory governance, regardless of who owns them (Rodotà Commission and Italian Supreme Court building on Nobel Prize Dr Elinor Ostrom). Examples: open-source hand rub saves 8 million lives yearly; open-source MRI scanners could spare 60-140 million € yearly in Germany alone; open-source prostheses mobilize 30000 volunteers with a 0 € business model; Open Source Drug Discovery gathers 110 projects on neglected diseases; open-source games for health showcase a ludic model to mutually take care. It is vital because: 1) being healthy requires commoning; 2) it can double access to care; 3) it helps fight corruption; 4) costs can be cut by 10 or 100. Additional resources: reminder of definitions (free/libre and open-source vs gratis); three steps to start (Goals, design principles, validation); self-assessment (health, people, process, licences, resource allocation, physical availability, impact); links to guide for makers, poster with further examples, report on open source in Switzerland. Version en français, Extended version on open-source respiratory health commons: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5515632 – Editable version on NextCloud/OnlyOffice: https://cloud.houseofcommons.ch/index.php/s/4tK94nbQMYQBJNo

En mars 2021, la revue Actualités en Analyse Transactionnelle a lancé un forum sur le thème : « Où commence et où s’arrête la liberté individuelle quand la sécurité de tous est menacée ? ». Dans leur appel à contributions, Anne-Françoise Lefevre, Danielle Mizrahi et Françoise Temmerman abordaient la question de violences physiques envers des personnes qui avaient demandé à d’autres de porter un masque. Elles écrivaient : « Dans ce contexte où liberté individuelle et sécurité de tous s’entrechoquent, une question importante se pose : jusqu’où est-il possible de trouver un équilibre entre le respect des droits de chacun et la protection de tous ? ». Nous avons proposé le texte suivant, qui a été refusé par le comité éditorial, ce dernier considérant que notre article « ne manifestait pas assez d'OKness pour figurer dans les pages des AAT ». Nous avons donc choisi d’auto-publier cet article afin de nourrir un dialogue sur le sujet, et d’inviter à une réflexion sur ce que signifie l’Okness, et comment cela peut s’appliquer à différents niveaux., Contribuez à la discussion sur https://cloud.houseofcommons.ch/index.php/s/DsnBdcLksNLp6Re

Aperçu des deux événements de co-création réalisés en mars et octobre 2019 avec les hôpitaux Necker, Cochin et le Fonds FHF de la Fédération hospitalière de France. L'objectif était de rendre le soin ludique en co-créant des jeux avec des jeunes de 16-24 ans qui ont la mucoviscidose. Nous avons adopté une méthode de conception participative pour concevoir deux jeux numériques (dont un multijoueur) et un capteur transformant le souffle (pression, débit) en signal numérique., Vidéo : télécharger le fichier m4a ci-dessous ou aller sur https://youtu.be/ZHMKuNcmiQQ – Découvrir et contribuer au projet : https://www.breathinggames.net/fr/

Play is a natural way to experiment, socialize, learn.Our community invitespeopleto collectively createlibre and open-sourcegames and game controllers to foster mutual and self-care inrespiratory and mental health. We present the evolution ofBreathing Games since its inception in 2014 : the commons (principles, UN global goals, organization, contributors, collaboration, funding), events (2014 to now), outcomes (games, hardware, GHF Open Village, research, publications). This is also our communication on progress as signatories of the United Nations Global Compact.

La popolazione è in grado di rispondere a un'emergenza nazionale con soluzioni adeguate in poche ore, se ha una piattaforma per dare priorità ai bisogni (consenso popolare) e creare progetti comuni. Questo processo partecipativo evita le insidie dei processi decisionali centralizzati : problemi di potere, disconoscimento delle realtà sul terreno, forze limitate, resistenza popolare, conseguenze non volute. Presentiamo come la cultura svizzera di democrazia diretta può arricchirsi con la tecnologia aperta. NEW TEXT – English version – Version française, Per sostenere o contribuire a questa proposta, registratevi su https://www.houseofcommons.ch.