Search

Objective: Alterations in voice intensity and quality may constitute a social life limitation in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), but only 2% of cases receive speech therapy. Especially the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT)-Loud is a highly effective intensive method for voice intensity, requiring subjects’ repeated attendance at the clinic. Telerehabilitation may represent a feasible solution to bypass potential barriers related to speech therapy attendance, scaling up the beneficial effects of the treatment to a broader population. The proposed protocol aims to test the feasibility and the pilot efficacy of the LSVT-Loud delivered in telerehabilitation (Tele-LSVT-Loud), compared to the same treatment delivered in the clinic (LSVT-Loud). Methods: A single-blinded, parallel, two-arm, pilot randomized (1:1 ratio) controlled trial will be performed involving 20 people with MS. Patients will be allocated to 4 weeks of Tele-LSVT-Loud by accessing a telerehabilitation platform at home or LSVT-Loud conventionally delivered in the clinic. Feasibility and pilot effectiveness will be evaluated three times: before (T0), after the treatment (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2). Feasibility measures will include adherence, adverse events, user experience, motivation, engagement, and acceptability. Vocal intensity during a 1-minute monologue will be the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures will be the vocal quality during a 1-minute monologue, sustained /a/ voice intensity, quality and stability, voice use in daily life, voice subjective perception in daily life, and quality of life. Results: Expected results will be (1) high feasibility of Tele-LSVT-Loud and (2) a non-inferiority effect of Tele-LSVT-Loud compared with face-to-face treatment delivery on voice intensity and quality outcomes. Conclusions: Tele-LSVT-Loud may be a feasible intervention for MS alteration in voice intensity and quality with a non-inferior effect compared to LSVT-Loud.

BACKGROUND: Vocal disorders are frequent in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Cognitive impairment, fatigue, depression, and other clinical characteristics can be associated with treatment effectiveness in rehabilitation. Finding baseline characteristics that identify those who are responding to treatment can help the clinical decision-making process, which can then help improve the effectiveness of voice treatment. We developed a model to identify factors associated with treatment-related improvement on voice intensity in people with MS. METHODS: Data are from a randomized controlled trial of the effects of voice therapy. Forty-four people with MS were enrolled and randomized to receive Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD, specifically addressing voice intensity, or conventional speech-therapy group. Voice intensity (dB) was measured during monologue before and after treatment and was used to differentiate those who responded (posttreatment voice intensity?> 60 dB) from those who did not. Possible associated factors were cognitive impairment, fatigue, depression, disability, and disease duration. Associations were assessed by univariate logistic regression and univariate and multivariate linear regressions. RESULTS: Mean ± SD monologue voice intensity is improved in the whole sample (before rehabilitation: 51.8 ± 4.2 dB; and after rehabilitation 57.0 ± 6.5 dB; P <.001), and 11 people with MS (27.5%) responded to treatment. Specificity of treatment was associated with the return to normal voice intensity (OR, 14.28; 95% CI, 12.17-309.56) and we found a linear association between voice improvement and the specificity of treatment (6.65 [SE = 1.54] dB; P <.05). Moreover, the analysis revealed a nonlinear association between improvement and fatigue, suggesting increased benefits for people with MS with moderate fatigue. Other factors were not significantly associated with treatment effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate fatigue and the specificity of the inter

Background: Hypophonia is a prevailing problem in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of voice rehabilitation is lacking. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the most effective method to reduce hypophonia. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 44 PwMS were randomized to intensive and high-effort voice treatment groups, the LSVT-LOUD®, and conventional treatment group. Subjects received 16 treatments (4 sessions/week) lasting 45 minutes. The primary outcome was voice intensity (dB) in monologue, vocalization, and sentences while voice handicap index (VHI) measured voice self-perception. Outcomes were assessed by a blinded observer at baseline, post-treatment, and 15-month follow-up (FU). Results: Linear models revealed a significant post-intervention between-group mean difference in favor of LSVT-LOUD for monologue: +6.3 dB (95% CI: 2.5 to 10.1); vocalization: +7.4 dB (95% CI: 2.3 to 12.5); and sentences: +9.5 dB (95% CI: 4.7 to 14.3). However, 43.7% PwMS in the LSVT-LOUD and 10% in the conventional treatment group obtained a full recovery of voice intensity (>60 dB) post-treatment, Fisher’s test = 13.3, p < 0.01. However, these improvements were not maintained at FU. Between-group differences at VHI were −10.8 (95% CI: −21.2 to −0.4) and −11.3 (95% CI: −24.3 to −1.7) in favor of LSVT-LOUD at post and FU. Conclusion: LSVT-LOUD can be a valid treatment to increase voice intensity in PwMS. However, results suggest the need for FU interventions targeting maintenance.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop an exercise protocol to improve maximal mouth opening (MMO), tongue protrusion (Tprot), tongue strength (Tstren), and lip strength (Lstren), and to assess its effects on subjects with scleroderma. Methods: We performed four replicated single-system studies in a consecutive sample of subjects with scleroderma. An instrumented assessment measured MMO, Tprot, Tstren, and Lstren. Each day, subjects were assessed and performed orofacial exercises conducted by speech therapists. Treatments were first aimed at improving mouth physical characteristics by impairment-oriented exercises and then to improve skills with function-oriented exercises. Results: The mean phase differences between assessment and treatment phases across subjects were from 0.88 to 9.56 mm in MMO, from 2.03 to 12.3 mm in Tprot, from-0.12 to 5.35 N in Tstren, and from-0.84 to 5.19 N in Lstren. After treatment, 3 subjects crossed the 5th percentile discriminating normal from abnormal performances for both Tstren and Tprot, while this occurred in 2 subjects for MMO and Lstren. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that rehabilitation appears to be useful in reducing tongue and lip impairments and in improving oral functions in subjects with scleroderma.