Search

Numerous studies have demonstrated the clinical value of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) populations. However, the eligibility criteria for CGM coverage required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) ignore the conclusive evidence that supports CGM use in various diabetes populations that are currently deemed ineligible. In an earlier article, we discussed the limitations and inconsistencies of the agency's CGM eligibility criteria relative to current scientific evidence and proposed practice solutions to address this issue and improve the safety and care of Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes. Although Medicaid is administered through CMS, there is no consistent Medicaid policy for CGM coverage in the United States. This article presents a rationale for modifying and standardizing Medicaid CGM coverage eligibility across the United States., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: R.J.G. is supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award numbers 2P30DK1110246 and K23DK123384-3. R.J.G. received research support to Emory University for investigator-initiated studies from Novo Nordisk, Dexcom, and Eli-Lilly and consulting fees from Sanofi, Eli-Lilly, Boehringer, Pfizer, and Weight Watchers, outside of this work. G.A. has received research support to Northwestern University from Astra Zeneca, Dexcom, Eli-Lilly, Emmes, Fractyl Health, Insulet, Novo Nordisk, and WellDoc. G.A. has received consulting fees from Eli-Lilly, Dexcom, and Insulet outside of this work. C.G.P. has received consulting fees from Abbott Diabetes Care, CeQur, Dexcom, LifeScan, Mannkind, Roche Diabetes Care, and ProventionBio. D.A.B. has no disclosures associated with this manuscript. A.L.C. has received research support from UnitedHealthcare, Abbott, Dexcom, Eli-Lilly, Insulet, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi, and is a consultant for Medtronic and Insulet, with all financial support going to his institution. In addition, ALC has a patent, Treatment of Hypoglycemia Unawareness with Intranasal Insulin, pending to HealthPartners Institute. EC is a scientific advisor for Eli-Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Adocia, and Arecor. G.P.F. received research support from Medtronic, Dexcom, Abbott, Tandem, Insulet, Beta Bionics, and Lilly, and has served as a consultant, speaker, and advisory board member for Medtronic, Dexcom, Abbott, Tandem, Insulet, Beta Bionics, and Lilly. D.F.K. institution has received research support from NIH, Helmsley Foundation, Novo Nordisk, Abbott Diabetes, and Dexcom. D.F.K. has received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Abbott Diabetes, Mannkind, CeQur, Sanofi, Medical Module, ProventionBio, and Pendulum. D.F.K. is the speaker for Dexcom, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Xeris, and CeQur. D.F.K. has stock options not redeemed in Pendulum. C.J.L. has received research support by the NIDDK and Helmsley Foundation and industry support paid to the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai from Abbott Diabetes, Dexcom, Insulet, Novo Nordisk, Senseonics, and Tandem. C.J.L. has received consulting fees from Eli-Lilly, and Dexcom outside of this work. J.B.M. has received research support from the NIH, Helmsley Foundation, JDRF, Novo Nordisk, and Beta Bionics. J.B.M. has received consulting fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Lilly, Mannkind, Novo Nordisk, and Thermo Fisher outside of this work. G.E.U. is partly supported by research grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH/NATS UL 3UL1TR002378-05S2) from the Clinical and Translational Science Award program, and from National Institutes of Health and National Center for Research Resources (NIH/NIDDK 2P30DK111024-06). G.E.U. has received research support (to Emory University) from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Abbott, and Dexcom.

Introduction: Islet transplantation (ITx) shows promise in treating T1D, but the role of islet autoantibodies on graft survival has not been clearly elucidated. We aimed to analyze the effect of GAD65 and IA2 autoantibody status on graft survival and attainment of insulin independence in subjects with T1D who underwent ITx., Method: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 47 ITx recipients from 2000 to 2018. Islet infusion was performed via intrahepatic portal (n=44) or onto the omentum via laparoscopic approach (n=3). Immunosuppression involved anti-IL2 receptor antibody, anti-TNF, and dual combinations of sirolimus, tacrolimus, or mycophenolate mofetil (Edmonton-like) in 38 subjects (80.9%). T-cell depletion induction with Edmonton-like maintenance was used in 9 subjects (19%). GAD65 and IA2 autoantibodies were assessed pre-transplant and post-transplant (monthly) until graft failure, and categorized as persistently negative, persistently positive, or seroconverters. Graft survival was analyzed using U-Mann-Whitney test, and Quade's nonparametric ANCOVA adjusted for confounders. Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank tests were employed to analyze attainment of insulin independence. P value <0.05 indicated statistical significance., Results: ITx recipients with persistent autoantibody negativity (n = 21) showed longer graft function (98 [61 - 182] months) than those with persistent autoantibody positivity (n = 18; 38 [13 - 163] months), even after adjusting for immunosuppressive induction protocol (P = 0.027). Seroconverters (n=8) had a median graft survival time of 73 (7.7 - 167) months, which did not significantly differ from the other 2 groups. Subjects with persistently single antibody positivity to GAD65 (n = 8) had shorter graft survival compared to negative islet autoantibody (GAD65/IA2) subjects (n = 21; P = 0.016). Time of graft survival did not differ in subjects with single antibody positivity to IA2. The proportion of insulin independence attainment was similar irrespective of autoantibody status., Conclusion: The persistence of islet autoantibodies, as markers of islet autoimmunity, may represent an underappreciated contributing factor to the failure of transplanted β cells. Whether induction with T-cell depletion may lead to improved graft survival, independent of islet autoantibody status, could not be evaluated in our cohort. Larger prospective studies are needed to further address the role of islet autoantibody status on islet graft survival., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Lemos, Poggioli, Ambut, Bozkurt, Alvarez, Padilla, Vendrame, Ricordi, Baidal and Alejandro.)

Background: There is limited evidence that the diabetes in-person consult in hospitalized patients can be replaced by a virtual consult. During COVID-19 pandemic, the diabetes in-person consult service at the University of Miami and Miami Veterans Affairs Healthcare System transitioned to a virtual model. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of telemedicine on glycemic control after this transition., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed glucose metrics from in-person consults (In-person) during January 16 to March 14, 2020 and virtual consults during March 15 to May 14, 2020. Data from virtual consults were analyzed by separating patients infected with COVID-19, who were seen only virtually (Virtual-COVID-19-Pos), and patients who were not infected (Virtual-COVID-19-Neg), or by combining the two groups (Virtual-All)., Results: Patient-day-weighted blood glucose was not significantly different between In-person, Virtual-All, and Virtual-COVID-19-Neg, but Virtual-COVID-19-Pos had significantly higher mean ± SD blood glucose (mg/dL) compared with others (206.7 ± 49.6 In-person, 214.6 ± 56.2 Virtual-All, 206.5 ± 57.2 Virtual-COVID-19-Neg, 229.7 ± 51.6 Virtual-COVID-19-Pos; P = .015). A significantly less percentage of patients in this group also achieved a mean ± SD glucose target of 140 to 180 mg/dL (23.8 ± 22.5 In-person, 21.5 ± 20.5 Virtual-All, 25.3 ± 20.8 Virtual-COVID-19-Neg, and 14.4±18.1 Virtual-COVID-19-Pos, P = .024), but there was no significant difference between In-person, Virtual-All, and Virtual-COVID-19-Neg. The occurrence of hypoglycemia was not significantly different among groups., Conclusions: In-person and virtual consults delivered by a diabetes team at an academic institution were not associated with significant differences in glycemic control. These real-world data suggest that telemedicine could be used for in-patient diabetes management, although additional studies are needed to better assess clinical outcomes and safety., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: To determine C-peptide measures and levels associated with positive glycemic control outcomes following islet transplant (ITx) in type 1 diabetes., Research Design and Methods: We evaluated Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR) islet-alone recipients with pretransplant C-peptide <0.1 nmol/L and mean follow-up of 4.6 ± 1.1 years (n = 677). Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) was used to evaluate the predictive value of fasting and stimulated glucose and C-peptide measures for seven primary outcomes: 1) absence of severe hypoglycemic events (ASHEs); 2) HbA1c <7.0%; 3) HbA1c <7.0% and ASHEs; 4) HbA1c ≤6.5%; 5) HbA1c ≤6.5% and ASHEs; 6) insulin independence; and 7) ASHEs, HbA1c ≤6.5%, and insulin independence (the optimal outcome). Measures with the highest ROC-AUC were selected for determination of optimal cut points., Results: Fasting C-peptide was highly predictive for ASHE (ROC-AUC 0.906; optimal cut point 0.070 nmol/L) and the optimal outcome (ROC-AUC 0.845; optimal cut point 0.33 nmol/L). Mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT)-stimulated C-peptide-to-glucose ratio (CPGR) outperformed both fasting and stimulated C-peptide for all outcomes except ASHE. The optimal cut point for the optimal outcome was 0.12 nmol/mmol for MMTT-stimulated CPGR and 0.97 nmol/L for MMTT-stimulated C-peptide., Conclusions: Fasting C-peptide reliably predicts ITx primary outcomes. MMTT-stimulated CPGR provides marginally better prediction for composite ITx outcomes, including insulin independence. In the absence of an MMTT, a fasting C-peptide ≥0.33 nmol/L is a reassuring measure of optimal islet graft function. C-peptide targets represent excellent and easily determinable means to predict glycemic control outcomes after ITx and should be considered as potential goals of β-cell replacement., (© 2023 by the American Diabetes Association.)

Islet cell transplantation (ITx) is an effective therapeutic approach for selected patients with type 1 diabetes with hypoglycemia unawareness and severe hypoglycemia events. In organ transplantation, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching between donor and recipient negatively impacts transplant outcomes. We aimed to determine whether HLA matching has an impact on islet allograft survival. Forty-eight patients were followed up after islet transplantation at our institution from 2000 to 2020 in a retrospective cohort. Patients underwent intrahepatic ITx or laparoscopic omental approach. Immunosuppression was dependent upon the protocol. We analyzed HLA data restricted to A, B, and DR loci on allograft survival using survival and subsequent multivariable analyses. Patients were aged 42.8 ± 8.4 years, and 64.3% were female. Diabetes duration was 28.6 ± 11.6 years. Patients matching all three HLA loci presented longer graft survival ( P = 0.030). Patients with ≥1 HLA-B matching had longer graft survival compared with zero matching ( P = 0.025). The number of HLA-B matching was positively associated with time of graft survival (Spearman's rho = 0.590; P = 0.034). Analyses adjusted for confounders showed that ≥1 matching for HLA-B decreased the risk of allograft failure ( P = 0.009). Our data suggest that HLA-B matching between recipients and donors improved islet allograft survival. Matching all three HLA loci (A, B, and DR) was also associated with prolonged islet allograft survival. Prospective studies and a larger sample size are warranted to validate our findings.

Context: Decreased first-phase insulin response (FPIR) during intravenous glucose tolerance testing (IVGTT) is an early indicator of β-cell dysfunction and predictor of type 1 diabetes (T1D)., Objective: Assess whether oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) measures could serve as FPIR alternatives in their ability to predict T1D in autoantibody positive (Aab+) subjects., Design: OGTT and IVGTT were performed within 30 days of each other. Eleven OGTT variables were evaluated for (1) correlation with FPIR and (2) T1D prediction., Setting: Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet "Oral Insulin for Prevention of Diabetes in Relatives at Risk for T1D" (TN-07) and Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Diabetes (DPT-1) studies clinical sites., Patients: TN-07 (n = 292; age 9.4 ± 6.1 years) and DPT-1 (n = 194; age 15.1 ± 10.0 years) Aab + relatives of T1D individuals., Main Outcome Measures: (1) Correlation coefficients of OGTT measures with FPIR and (2) T1D prediction at 2 years using area under receiver operating characteristic (ROCAUC) curves., Results: Index60 showed the strongest correlation in DPT-1 (r = -0.562) but was weaker in TN-07 (r = -0.378). C-peptide index consistently showed good correlation with FPIR across studies (TN-07, r = 0.583; DPT-1, r = 0.544; P < 0.0001). Index60 and C-peptide index had the highest ROCAUCs for T1D prediction (0.778 vs 0.717 in TN-07 and 0.763 vs 0.721 in DPT-1, respectively; P = NS), followed by FPIR (0.707 in TN-07; 0.628 in DPT-1)., Conclusions: C-peptide index was the strongest measure to correlate with FPIR in both studies. Index60 and C-peptide index had the highest predictive accuracy for T1D and were comparable. OGTTs could be considered instead of IVGTTs for subject stratification in T1D prevention trials., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Islet transplantation (ITx) has proved to be effective in preventing severe hypoglycemia and improving metabolic control in selected subjects with type 1 diabetes. Long-term graft function remains a challenge. Estrogens have been shown to protect β cells from metabolic stresses and improve revascularization of transplanted human islets in the mouse. We aimed to evaluate the influence of sex in allograft survival of ITx recipients., Methods: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of ITx recipients (n = 56) followed-up for up to 20 years. Allograft failure was defined as a stimulated C-peptide <0.3 ng/mL during a mixed-meal tolerance test. Subjects were divided into recipients of at least 1 female donor (group 1) and recipients of male donors only (group 2)., Results: Group 1 subjects (n = 25) were aged 41.5 ± 8.4 years and group 2 subjects (n = 22) 45.9 ± 7.3 years (P = 0.062). Female recipient frequency was 44.8% (n = 13) in group 1 and 55.2% (n = 16) in group 2 (P = 0.145). Group 2 developed graft failure earlier than group 1 (680 [286-1624] vs 1906 [756-3256] days, P = 0.038). We performed additional analyses on female recipients only from each group (group 1, n = 16; group 2, n = 20). Female recipients in group 1 exhibited prolonged allograft function compared with group 2, after adjustment for confounders (odds ratio, 28.6; 95% CI, 1.3-619.1; P < 0.05)., Conclusion: Recipients of islets from at least 1 female donor exhibited prolonged graft survival compared with recipients of islets from exclusively male donors. In addition, female recipients exhibited prolonged survival compared with male recipients following ITx of at least 1 female donor., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

BackgroundIL-6 receptor (IL-6R) signaling drives development of T cell populations important to type 1 diabetes pathogenesis. We evaluated whether blockade of IL-6R with monoclonal antibody tocilizumab would slow loss of residual β cell function in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes patients.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial with tocilizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes. Participants were screened within 100 days of diagnosis. Eligible participants were randomized 2:1 to receive 7 monthly doses of tocilizumab or placebo. The primary outcome was the change from screening in the mean AUC of C-peptide collected during the first 2 hours of a mixed meal tolerance test at week 52 in pediatric participants (ages 6-17 years).ResultsThere was no statistical difference in the primary outcome between tocilizumab and placebo. Immunophenotyping showed reductions in downstream signaling of the IL-6R in T cells but no changes in CD4 memory subsets, Th17 cells, Tregs, or CD4+ T effector cell resistance to Treg suppression. A DC subset decreased during therapy but regressed to baseline once therapy stopped. Tocilizumab was well tolerated.ConclusionTocilizumab reduced T cell IL-6R signaling but did not modulate CD4+ T cell phenotypes or slow loss of residual β cell function in newly diagnosed individuals with type 1 diabetes.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02293837.FundingNIH National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) UM1AI109565, UL1TR000004 from NIH/National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA), NIH/NIDDK P30DK036836, NIH/NIDDK U01DK103266, NIH/NIDDK U01DK103266, 1UL1TR000064 from NIH/NCRR CTSA, NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) UL1TR001878, UL1TR002537 from NIH/CTSA; National Health and Medical Research Council Practitioner Fellowship (APP1136735), NIH/NIDDK U01-DK085476, NIH/CTSA UL1-TR002494, Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute Award UL1TR002529, Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research UL1TR000445. NIH/NCATS UL1TR003142, NIH/CTSA program UL1-TR002494, Veteran Affairs Administration, and 1R01AI132774.

Over the last few years, technological advances have led to tremendous improvement in the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Artificial pancreas systems have been shown to improve glucose control compared with conventional insulin pump therapy. However, clinically significant hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic episodes still occur with the artificial pancreas. Postprandial glucose excursions and exercise-induced hypoglycemia represent major hurdles in improving glucose control and glucose variability in many patients with T1D. In this regard, dual-hormone artificial pancreas systems delivering other hormones in addition to insulin (glucagon or amylin) may better reproduce the physiology of the endocrine pancreas and have been suggested as an alternative tool to overcome these limitations in clinical practice. In addition, novel ultra-rapid-acting insulin analogs with a more physiological time-action profile are currently under investigation for use in artificial pancreas devices, aiming to address the unmet need for further improvements in postprandial glucose control. This review article aims to discuss the current progress and future outlook in the development of novel ultra-rapid insulin analogs and dual-hormone closed-loop systems, which offer the next steps to fully closing the loop in the artificial pancreas., (© 2021 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Islet allotransplantation in the United States (US) is facing an imminent demise. Despite nearly three decades of progress in the field, an archaic regulatory framework has stymied US clinical practice. Current regulations do not reflect the state-of-the-art in clinical or technical practices. In the US, islets are considered biologic drugs and "more than minimally manipulated" human cell and tissue products (HCT/Ps). In contrast, across the world, human islets are appropriately defined as "minimally manipulated tissue" and not regulated as a drug, which has led to islet allotransplantation (allo-ITx) becoming a standard-of-care procedure for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. This regulatory distinction impedes patient access to islets for transplantation in the US. As a result only 11 patients underwent allo-ITx in the US between 2016 and 2019, and all as investigational procedures in the settings of a clinical trials. Herein, we describe the current regulations pertaining to islet transplantation in the United States. We explore the progress which has been made in the field and demonstrate why the regulatory framework must be updated to both better reflect our current clinical practice and to deal with upcoming challenges. We propose specific updates to current regulations which are required for the renaissance of ethical, safe, effective, and affordable allo-ITx in the United States., (© 2020 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Objective: We set forth to compare ethnicities for metabolic and immunological characteristics at the clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and assess the effect of ethnicity on beta-cell functional loss within 3 years after clinical diagnosis., Research Methods and Design: We studied participants in TrialNet New Onset Intervention Trials (n = 624, median age = 14.4 years, 58% male, 8.7% Hispanic) and followed them prospectively for 3 years. Mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTT) were performed within 6 months following clinical diagnosis and repeated semiannually. Unless otherwise indicated, analyses were adjusted for age, sex, BMI Z-score, and diabetes duration., Results: At T1D clinical diagnosis, Hispanics, compared with non-Hispanic whites (NHW), had a higher frequency of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (44.7% vs 25.3%, OR = 2.36, P = 0.01), lower fasting glucose (97 vs 109 mg/dL, P = 0.02) and higher fasting C-peptide (1.23 vs 0.94 ng/mL, P = 0.02) on the first MMTT, and higher frequency of ZnT8 autoantibody positivity (n = 201, 94.1% vs 64%, OR = 7.98, P = 0.05). After exclusion of participants in experimental arms of positive clinical trials, C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) trajectories during the first 3 years after clinical diagnosis were not significantly different between Hispanics and NHW after adjusting for age, sex, BMI-z score, and DKA (n = 413, P = 0.14)., Conclusion: Despite differences in the metabolic and immunological characteristics at clinical diagnosis of T1D between Hispanics and NHW, C-peptide trajectories did not differ significantly in the first 3 years following clinical diagnosis after adjustment for body mass index and other confounders. These findings may inform the design of observational studies and intervention trials in T1D., (© Endocrine Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

A three-arm, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial performed by the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group previously demonstrated that low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (2.5 mg/kg) preserved β-cell function and reduced HbA 1c for 1 year in new-onset type 1 diabetes. Subjects ( N = 89) were randomized to 1 ) ATG and pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF), 2 ) ATG alone, or 3 ) placebo. Herein, we report 2-year area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide and HbA 1c , prespecified secondary end points, and potential immunologic correlates. The 2-year mean mixed-meal tolerance test-stimulated AUC C-peptide, analyzed by ANCOVA adjusting for baseline C-peptide, age, and sex ( n = 82) with significance defined as one-sided P < 0.025, was significantly higher in subjects treated with ATG versus placebo ( P = 0.00005) but not ATG/GCSF versus placebo ( P = 0.032). HbA 1c was significantly reduced at 2 years in subjects treated with ATG ( P = 0.011) and ATG/GCSF ( P = 0.022) versus placebo. Flow cytometry analyses demonstrated reduced circulating CD4:CD8 ratio, increased regulatory T-cell:conventional CD4 T-cell ratios, and increased PD-1 + CD4 + T cells following low-dose ATG and ATG/GCSF. Low-dose ATG partially preserved β-cell function and reduced HbA 1c 2 years after therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. Future studies should determine whether low-dose ATG might prevent or delay the onset of type 1 diabetes., (© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.)

Aims/hypothesis: We hypothesised that progression of islet autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes mellitus differs among races/ethnicities in at-risk individuals., Methods: In this study, we analysed the data from the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Pathway to Prevention Study. We studied 4873 non-diabetic, autoantibody-positive relatives of individuals with type 1 diabetes followed prospectively (11% Hispanic, 80.9% non-Hispanic white [NHW], 2.9% non-Hispanic black [NHB] and 5.2% non-Hispanic other [NHO]). Primary outcomes were time from single autoantibody positivity confirmation to multiple autoantibody positivity, and time from multiple autoantibody positivity to type 1 diabetes mellitus diagnosis., Results: Conversion from single to multiple autoantibody positivity was less common in Hispanic individuals than in NHW individuals (HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.46, 0.96], p = 0.028) adjusting for autoantibody type, age, sex, Diabetes Prevention Trial Type 1 Risk Score and HLA-DR3-DQ2/DR4-DQ8 genotype. In participants who screened positive for multiple autoantibodies (n = 2834), time to type 1 diabetes did not differ by race/ethnicity overall (p = 0.91). In children who were <12 years old when multiple autoantibody positivity was determined, being overweight/obese had differential effects by ethnicity: type 1 diabetes risk was increased by 36% in NHW children (HR 1.36 [95% CI 1.04, 1.77], p = 0.024) and was nearly quadrupled in Hispanic children (HR 3.8 [95% CI 1.6, 9.1], p = 0.0026). We did not observe this interaction in participants who were ≥12 years old at determination of autoantibody positivity, although this group size was limited. No significant differential risks were observed between individuals of NHB and NHW ethnicity., Conclusions/interpretation: The risk and rate of progression of islet autoimmunity were lower in Hispanic compared with NHW at-risk individuals, while significant differences in the development of type 1 diabetes were limited to children <12 years old and were modified by BMI.

The anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of high-dose omega-3 fatty acids and Vitamin D, and the initial encouraging results from case reports on the use of this supplementation in new-onset Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), support further testing of this combination strategy. This intervention appears to be well tolerated, affordable, and sufficiently safe to be further tested in randomized prospective trials to determine whether this combination therapy may be of assistance to halt progression of autoimmunity and/or preserve residual beta-cell function in subjects with new onset and established T1D of up to 10 years duration. In addition, the 1st PreDiRe T1D conference (Preventing Disease and its Recurrence in Type 1 Diabetes - see Editorial in this issue) was organized to discuss initial results and possible alternative/complementary strategies, for collaborative international expansion of these trials, to include strategies for disease prevention. Our POSEIDON clinical trial will test the use of high dose vitamin D3 and highly purified Omega-3 fatty acids in new onset and established T1D. The draft of the study protocol, in addition to the informed consent and assent, is now shared open access to facilitate its international implementation by interested physicians and centers that would like to further test this approach through clinical trials.

Several studies have evaluated the role of inflammation in type 1 diabetes (T1D). The safety profile and anti-inflammatory properties of high dose omega-3 fatty acids combined with Vitamin D supplementation make this therapy a possible candidate for T1D intervention trials. Herein, we describe the case of a 14-year-old boy with new onset T1D treated with high dose Omega-3 and vitamin D3. By 12 months, peak C-peptide increased to 0.55 nmol/L (1.66 ng/mL) corresponding to a 20% increment from baseline and AUC C-peptide was slightly higher compared to 9 months (0.33 vs. 0.30 nmol/L/min) although remaining slightly lower than baseline. Combination high-dose Omega-3 fatty acids and high-dose vitamin D3 therapy was well tolerated and may have beneficial effects on beta-cell function. Randomized controlled trials could be of assistance to determine whether this therapy may result in the preservation of beta-cell function in patients with new onset T1D.

Background: Allogeneic human islet transplantation is an effective therapy for the treatment of patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). The low number of islet transplants performed worldwide and the different transplantation protocols used limit the identification of the most effective therapeutic options to improve the efficacy of this approach., Methods: We present a retrospective analysis on the data collected from 44 patients with T1D who underwent islet transplantation at our institute between 2000 and 2007. Several variables were included: recipient demographics and immunological characteristics, donor and transplant characteristics, induction protocols, and additional medical treatment received. Immunosuppression was induced with anti-CD25 (Daclizumab), alone or in association with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) treatments (Etanercept or Infliximab), or with anti-CD52 (Alemtuzumab) in association with anti-TNF-α treatments (Etanercept or Infliximab). Subsets of patients were treated with Filgrastim for moderate/severe neutropenia and/or Exenatide for post prandial hyperglycemia., Results: The analysis performed indicates a negative association between graft survival (c-peptide level ≥ 0.3 ng/ml) and islet infusion volume, with the caveat that, the progressive reduction of infusion volumes over the years has been paralleled by improved immunosuppressive protocols. A positive association is instead suggested between graft survival and administration of Exenatide and Filgrastim, alone or in combination., Conclusion: This retrospective analysis may be of assistance to further improve long-term outcomes of protocols for transplant of islets and other organs.

Background: Islet transplantation can restore normoglycemia to patients with unstable type 1 diabetes mellitus, but long-term insulin independence is usually not sustained. Identification of predictor(s) of islet allograft dysfunction (IGD) might allow for early intervention(s) to preserve functional islet mass., Methods: Fourteen islet transplantation recipients with long-term history of type 1 diabetes mellitus underwent metabolic testing by mixed meal tolerance test, intravenous glucose tolerance test, and arginine stimulation test every 3 months postislet transplant completion. Metabolic responses were compared between subjects who maintained insulin independence at 18 months (group 1; n=5) and those who restarted insulin within 18 months (group 2; n=9). Data were analyzed before development of islet graft dysfunction and while insulin independent., Results: The 90-min glucose, time-to-peak C-peptide, and area under the curve for glucose were consistently higher in group 2 and increased as a function of time. At 12 months, acute insulin release to glucose in group 2 was markedly reduced as compared with baseline (5.62+/-1.21 microIU/mL, n=4 vs. 16.14+/-3.69 microIU/mL, n=8), whereas it remained stable in group 1 (22.36+/-4.98 microIU/mL, n=5 vs. 27.70+/-2.83 microIU/mL, n=5). Acute insulin release to glucose, acute C-peptide release to glucose (ACpRg), and mixed meal stimulation index were significantly decreased and time-to-peak C-peptide, 90-min glucose, and area under the curve for glucose were significantly increased when measured at time points preceding intervals where IGD occurred compared with intervals where there was no IGD., Conclusions: The intravenous glucose tolerance test and mixed meal tolerance test may be useful in the prediction of IGD and should be essential components of the metabolic testing of islet transplant recipients.

Many islet transplant recipients have medical conditions that could interfere with the accuracy of HbA1c measurements (e.g., anemia/dapsone use). Fructosamine is less prone to have clinical interferences and reflects glucose control in a shorter period of time than HbA1c. This study aimed to validate fructosamine use in islet transplant subjects and to evaluate its effectiveness as a predictor for islet graft dysfunction. Thirty-three islet transplant recipients who had concomitant fructosamine and HbA1c data available were retrospectively analyzed. HbA1c, fructosamine, mean capillary blood glucose, and islet graft function (fasting C-peptide/glucose ratio) were assessed. There was a significant and positive association between fructosamine and HbA1c (p < 0.0001). Both variables were also positively associated with mean overall and fasting capillary glucose. Neither fructosamine nor HbA1c was shown by ROC analysis to significantly discriminate between periods with and without subsequent graft dysfunction. HbA1c >6% was predictive of this outcome 1 month in advance (OR 2.95, p = 0.003). However, although significantly associated with graft dysfunction, use of this cutoff as a predictor of dysfunction has poor sensitivity (50%) and specificity (77.6%). Fructosamine above the normal range (>270 mumol/L Quest Diagnostics) was also predictive of ensuing dysfunction (OR 2.47, p = 0.03); however, it had similarly poor sensitivity (62%) and specificity (64%). Fructosamine can be used as an alternative to HbA1c for glycemic assessment in islet transplant recipients in situations with HbA1c assay interference. Neither HbA1c nor fructosamine are good predictors of islet graft dysfunction.

Background: Only a minority of islet transplant recipients maintain insulin independence at 5 years under the Edmonton protocol of immunosuppression. New immunosuppressive strategies are required to improve long-term outcomes., Materials and Methods: Three subjects with unstable type 1 diabetes mellitus underwent islet transplantation with alemtuzumab induction and sirolimus-tacrolimus maintenance for 3 months and then sirolimus-mycophenolic acid maintenance thereafter. Follow-up was more than 2 years. Comparison was with 16 historical subjects transplanted under the Miami version of the Edmonton protocol., Results: Insulin independence was achieved in 2 of 3 alemtuzumab and 14 of 16 historical subjects. Those who did not achieve insulin independence only received a single islet infusion. Insulin-independence rates remained unchanged in the alemtuzumab group, but decreased from 14 of 16 (88%) to 6 of 16 (38%) in the historical group over 2 years. Insulin requirements increased in the historical group while remaining stable in the alemtuzumab group. Comparison of functional measures at 3 months suggested better engraftment with alemtuzumab (P=NS). Further comparison of alemtuzumab versus historical groups, up to 24 months, demonstrated significantly better: Mixed meal stimulation index (24 months, 1.0+/-0.08 [n=3] vs. 0.5+/-0.06 pmol/mL [n=6], P<0.01), mixed meal peak C-peptide (24 months, 5.0+/-0.5 [n=3] vs. 3.1+/-0.3 nmol/mL [n=6], P<0.05), HbA1c (24 months, 5.4+/-0.15 [n=3] vs. 6.3+/-0.12 pmol/mL [n=10], P<0.01). Administration of alemtuzumab was well tolerated. There was no increased incidence of infections in alemtuzumab subjects despite profound, prolonged lymphocyte depletion., Conclusions: Islet transplantation with alemtuzumab induction was well tolerated and resulted in improved short- and long-term outcomes. Further investigation is underway for validation.

Background: Progressive graft dysfunction (GDF) and loss of insulin independence (II) have been invariably observed in islet transplant recipients under the "Edmonton protocol." To reestablish II, we performed supplemental islet infusions (SI) in recipients of allogeneic islet transplant alone, displaying GDF. To improve the engraftment and long-term graft function of SI, exenatide (EXN) and etanercept treatment at islet infusion, and long-term EXN treatment were tested in a non-randomized pilot clinical trial., Methods: Patients with GDF received SI under Edmonton-like immunosuppression with daclizumab induction, either without interventions (SI-control; n=5) or with EXN and etanercept treatment (SI-EXN; n=4). Clinical and metabolic profiles were assessed during 18-month follow-up., Results: Long-term II (18 months) was observed in 100% of SI-EXN and in 20% of SI-control (P=0.04). SI-EXN subjects demonstrated restoration of function better than that seen after initial islet infusions. Comparison of SI-EXN and SI-control groups demonstrated better responses in SI-EXN subjects at 3 months post-SI. During the 18 months of follow-up, function was sustained in the SI-EXN subjects better than in SI-controls. Acute effects of EXN during mixed meal tolerance test and intravenous glucose tolerance test results in improved first and second phase insulin release in response to intravenous glucose tolerance test and suppressed postprandial hyperglucagonemia after mixed meal tolerance test., Conclusion: These results suggest that the combination of EXN and etanercept improve engraftment and long-term islet survival and function in subjects undergoing SI. This data, however, must be interpreted with some caution because of small sample size, lack of randomization, and sequential comparison with historical controls.

Background: Health related quality of life (HRQoL) is one of the most important outcomes to measure effectiveness of an intervention, especially for islet transplantation in which benefits should outweigh risks of long-term immunosuppression. This study aimed to evaluate long-term effects of islet transplantation and to outline possible influential factors., Methods: Forty islet transplant recipients who completed 344 Health Status Questionnaires (HSQ 2.0) and 384 Diabetes Quality of Life Questionnaires (DQoL) between 2000 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Assessments were analyzed in pretransplantation period, then every 3 months after the first infusion for 18 months and every 6 months thereafter. The mean follow-up posttransplantation was 40.8+/-21.9 months (9-72 months)., Results: Sustained improvement in DQoL-impact score was observed at all time-points posttransplantation. Similarly, worry and satisfaction scales were significantly better than pretransplant evaluation for most time-points. Four of eight HSQ 2.0 scales demonstrated a significant improvement at some time-points. Longitudinal analysis, after adjustments for potential confounding factors, showed significantly sustained improvement in impact scale up to 72 months. Longer diabetes duration, higher insulin dosage, and occurrence of adverse events had negative effects on HRQoL. Single islet infusion or islet after kidney transplant recipients showed the lowest values in HSQ 2.0. In contrast, subjects on exenatide therapy had significantly higher HSQ 2.0 scores., Conclusions: Islet transplantation is associated with long-term improvement in HRQoL. Exenatide usage had a positive effect whereas single islet infusion, islet after kidney transplantation, longer diabetes duration, higher insulin dosage, and adverse events had a negative impact on HRQoL scores.

Objective: To determine the impact of islet transplantation (ITx) on hypoglycemia awareness in patients with unstable type 1 diabetes and its relation to islet function., Research Design and Methods: A total of 31 ITx recipients were studied. Hypoglycemia unawareness was assessed using the Clarke hypoglycemic score (0 = no hypoglycemia; >or=4 = hypoglycemia unawareness). Subjects were grouped based on graft function: off-insulin (n = 8), graft dysfunction (on-insulin and stimulated C-peptide >or=0.3 ng/ml, n = 13), and graft failure (stimulated C-peptide <0.3 ng/ml, n = 10, evaluated 11.5 +/- 14.5 months after graft failure)., Results: The hypoglycemia score improved after ITx when compared with baseline values (before vs. after: 5.29 +/- 1.51 vs. 1.35 +/- 1.92, P < 0.001). This result was sustained even after patient stratification based on islet function (pre vs. post off-insulin: 5.63 +/- 2.00 vs. no hypoglycemia reported; graft dysfunction: 5.31 +/- 1.49 vs. 1.15 +/- 1.63, P < 0.001; and graft failure: 5.00 +/- 1.16 vs. 2.70 +/- 2.26, P = 0.014)., Conclusions: The improved metabolic control achieved with ITx can restore hypoglycemia awareness in patients with type 1 diabetes, persisting even after islet graft failure.

Allogeneic islet transplantation is becoming a treatment option for patients with unstable type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Around 80% of the islet recipients achieve insulin independence after one or two islet infusions under "Edmonton-like" immunosuppressive protocol, but only 10% will remain insulin independent over the long term. Islet transplantation leads to glucose stabilization, and severe hypoglycemia is prevented even in patients back on insulin injections. Thus, islet transplantation has achieved the proposed targets in patients with unstable T1DM: normalizing blood glucose and hemoglobin A(1c), preventing severe hypoglycemic episodes, and improving quality of life. The current aims of islet transplantation programs are to maintain the success achieved and to overcome remaining obstacles and limitations.

Background: A current limitation of islet transplantation is reduced long-term graft function. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, exenatide (Byetta, Amylin Pharmaceuticals, CA) has properties that could improve existing islet function, prevent further loss of islet mass and possibly even stimulate islet regeneration., Methods: This prospective study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and metabolic effects of exenatide in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus and islet allograft dysfunction requiring exogenous insulin., Results: Sixteen subjects commenced exenatide, 12 continue (follow-up 214+/-57 days; range 108-287), four (25%) discontinued medication because of side effects. At 6 months, exogenous insulin was significantly reduced with stable glycemic control (0.15+/-0.02 vs. 0.11+/-0.025 U/kg per day; P<0.0001); three subjects discontinued insulin from 4, 5, and 9 U/day, respectively, two sustained insulin independence with A1c reduction below graft dysfunction criteria. Postprandial capillary blood glucose was significantly decreased (129.4+/-3.8 vs. 118.7+/-4.6 mg/dL; P<0.001), C-peptide and C-peptide-to-glucose ratio increased significantly by 5th and 6th months of treatment (ratio, 1.09+/-0.15 vs. 1.52+/-0.18; P<0.05). Weight loss more than 3 kg occurred in 8 of 12 (67%) subjects. Stimulation testing demonstrated improved glucose disposal and C-peptide secretion (glucose area under the curve 52,332+/-3,219 vs. 42,072+/-1,965; P=0.002 mg x min x dL, mixed meal stimulation index 0.50+/-0.06 vs. 0.66+/-0.09; P=0.03 pmol x mL), with marked suppression of glucagon secretion and progressive increase in amylin secretion. Side effects were more frequent and severe compared with published reports in type 2 diabetes, tolerated doses were lower., Conclusions: Exenatide was tolerated in this patient population after appropriate dose titration and there appeared to be gradual but sustained positive effects on glycemic control and islet graft function.

To prevent graft rejection and avoid immunosuppression-related side-effects, we attempted to induce recipient chimerism and graft tolerance in islet transplantation by donor CD34+hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) infusion. Six patients with brittle type 1 Diabetes Mellitus received a single-donor allogeneic islet transplant (8611 +/- 2113 IEQ/kg) followed by high doses of donor HSC (4.3 +/- 1.9 x 10(6) HSC/kg), at days 5 and 11 posttransplant, without ablative conditioning. An 'Edmonton-like' immunosuppression was administered, with a single dose of anti-TNFalpha antibody (Infliximab) added to induction. Immunosuppression was weaned per protocol starting 12 months posttransplant. After transplantation, glucose control significantly improved, with 3 recipients achieving insulin-independence for a short time (24 +/- 23 days). No severe hypoglycemia or protocol-related adverse events occurred. Graft function was maximal at 3 months then declined. Two recipients rejected within 6 months due to low immunosuppressive trough levels, whereas 4 completed 1-year follow-up with functioning grafts. Graft failure occurred within 4 months from weaning (478 +/- 25 days posttransplant). Peripheral chimerism, as donor leukocytes, was maximal at 1-month (5.92 +/- 0.48%), highly reduced at 1-year (0.20 +/- 0.08%), and was undetectable at graft failure. CD25+T-lymphocytes significantly decreased at 3 months, but partially recovered thereafter. Combined islet and HSC allotransplantation using an 'Edmonton-like' immunosuppression, without ablative conditioning, did not lead to stable chimerism and graft tolerance.

Background: The beneficial effects of glycemic control on both survival and function of transplanted kidneys in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have been recognized., Methods: Herein, we present the clinical outcome of a single-center pilot trial of islet after kidney (IAK) transplantation in seven patients with T1DM. The immunosuppression protocol for the kidney graft was converted to sirolimus+tacrolimus regimen 6 months before islet transplantation to exclude negative effects on kidney graft function. Primary endpoint was achievement of insulin independence after transplantation. Clinical outcome, metabolic control, severe hypoglycemia, kidney function, Quality of Life (QOL) psychometric measures, and adverse events were monitored., Results: Seven patients showed graft function with improved metabolic control (A1c, fasting glycemia, and metabolic tests) after IAK (14,779+/-3,800 IEQ/kg). One-year insulin independence was 30% with persistent graft function in 86% (C-peptide-positive). A1c reduction was 1.95+/-0.31% from baseline (P<0.0001). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia were observed, even after resuming insulin. The direct consequence of these benefits was a significant improvement in diabetes QOL. Adverse events included procedure-related pleural effusion (n=2), cholecystitis (n=1), and additional immunosuppression-related, all resolved without sequelae. Kidney function (by estimated glomerular filtration rate) remained stable during follow-up in six of seven patients., Conclusions: Islet transplantation represents a feasible therapeutic option for patients with T1DM bearing a stable kidney allograft. Insulin independence at 1 year is lower than what reported in islet transplant alone. Nevertheless, clear benefits in terms of optimal metabolic control and absence of severe hypoglycemia are invariably present.

Background: This study evaluated the effects of islet allotransplantation (ITx) on metabolic control utilizing a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and assessed its effectiveness as an indicator and predictor of graft dysfunction (GD)., Methods: Glycemic control was assessed in 25 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM); 12 ITx recipients and 13 controls. Mean interstitial glucose, standard deviation (SD), glucose variability, and percentage of time in hyperglycemia (%GT >140 mg/dl), hypoglycemia (%GT <54 mg/dl), and normoglycemia (%GT 54-140 mg/dl) were measured in 72-hour time periods from CGMS recordings in the control group at baseline and in the ITx group at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 months after ITx completion and were analyzed as predictors and indicators of GD. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), 90-minute glucose after a mixed meal tolerance test, fasting C-peptide/glucose ratio, and insulin requirements were followed., Results: Compared to the control group, the percentage of time in hypoglycemia was significantly lower in the ITx group at all time points; time in normoglycemia was increased at all times except at 15 months; and time in hyperglycemia was significantly lower at 6, 9, 12, and 18 months. Mean glucose and glucose variability were significantly lower in the ITx group at all times except at 3 and 15 months, whereas HbA1c and 90-minute glucose were significantly lower in the ITx group at all time points. Mean glucose, SD, glucose variability, and %GT >140 mg/dl were significant as indicators but not as predictors of GD., Conclusions: The CGMS demonstrated the benefits of ITx in T1DM, with improvements in glycemic control apparent up to 18 months after transplant. CGMS measures were found to be indicators of GD.

Background: To investigate whether changes of nutritional status and behavior are associated with islet transplantation (ITx) and to assess their possible mechanisms., Methods: In this observational study, 52 subjects with type 1 diabetes, 30 of whom received ITx, underwent nutritional assessments. The study consisted of questionnaires complemented by a dietary intake recording, anthropometric measurements, and body composition analysis. Laboratory tests were also reviewed as part of the follow up., Results: After ITx, significant reductions in body weight (3.7 kg; P<0.0001), body mass index (1.39 kg/m2; P<0.0001), waist circumference (3.96 cm; P=0.006), and fat weight (3.28 kg; P<0.01) were observed. The average consumption of carbohydrate and protein were also lower than pretransplant, together with some micronutrients (vitamins B12 and B6, zinc, and phosphorus). Insulin administration and changes in A1C were not associated with a significant change in anthropometric measurements. Subjects on exenatide after ITx showed significantly lower weight and body mass index than those not taking exenatide., Conclusions: ITx is associated with modifications in nutritional behavior and status. Drugs and health conditions are likely to be at least in part responsible for these changes, but a voluntary modification of eating habits by the patients also plays a role. Strict monitoring of nutritional parameters, counseling by experts in nutrition, and multivitamin/mineral supplement after ITx could be of benefit to the patients.

Background: The immune monitoring of islet transplant recipients includes the assessment of panel reactive antibodies (PRA). A negative association of PRA+ with allogeneic solid organ graft survival has been recognized, but scattered data is available for islet transplantation., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of PRA status in 66 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus recipient of islet allografts between 1985 and 2006., Results: Pretransplant PRA+ was observed in 10 subjects in the old trials and associated with kidney transplantation and/or pregnancies. Thirteen subjects displayed PRA+ at follow-up, eight of whom were de novo. Overall, PRA+ did not correlate with islet graft outcome: long-term graft survival was observed in the presence of basal or persistent PRA+ and graft dysfunction occurred also in the absence of PRA+. Loss of graft function was associated with PRA+ after lowering of immunosuppression or after infection episodes. Loss of C-peptide did not affect kidney graft function even in simultaneous islet-kidney transplant recipients. Mostly, PRA remained negative under adequate immunosuppression. Patients whose immunosuppression was discontinued invariably developed PRA+., Conclusions: Monitoring of PRA under immunosuppression may have little clinical value under adequate immunosuppression in islet transplant recipients. The implications of allosensitization after discontinuation of immunosuppression need to be evaluated to define the real clinical impact in this patient population.

In order to make islet transplantation a therapeutic option for patients with diabetes there is an urgent need for more efficient islet cell processing to maximize islet recovery. Improved donor management, organ recovery techniques, implementation of more stringent donor criteria, and improved islet cell processing techniques may contribute to enhance organ utilization for transplantation. We have analyzed the effects of donor and islet processing factors on the success rate of human islet cell processing for transplantation performed at a single islet cell processing center. Islet isolation outcomes improved when vasopressors, and in particular pitressin, and steroids were used for the management of multiorgan donors. Higher islet yields were obtained from adult male donors, BMI >25 kg/m2, adequate glycemic control during hospital stay, and when the pancreas was retrieved by a local surgical team. Successful isolations were obtained in 58% of the cases when > or = 4 donor criteria were met, and even higher success rates (69%) were observed when considering > or = 5 criteria. Our data suggest that a sequential, integrated approach is highly desirable to improve the success rate of islet cell processing.

Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent used in solid organ and islet transplantation. Its topical form has shown benefit in the treatment of inflammatory skin conditions. Although tacrolimus has a wide spectrum of side effects, dermatological complications related to systemic tacrolimus therapy are limited in the literature. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic pruritic cutaneous condition that usually begins in infancy and is characterized by an increased Th2 response. We report the case of a patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and history of AD latent for 10 years who developed severe dermatitis and alopecia 5 months after undergoing allogeneic islet transplantation and initiating a steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen with sirolimus and tacrolimus maintenance. After exclusion of other possible causes for the progression and exacerbation of the clinical presentation of AD, discontinuation of tacrolimus and introduction of mycophenolate mofetil resulted in full remission of the symptoms. The beneficial effects of tacrolimus withdrawal suggest a cause-effect relationship between this adverse event and the utilization of the drug. Islet graft function remained stable after modification of the therapeutic regimen (stable glycemic control and unchanged C-peptide).

This study analyzed quality of life in patients with type 1 diabetes that received islet transplantation. Twenty-three subjects were followed over 3 years. In addition to an interview, patients self-completed two standardized psychometric questionnaires, HSQ 2.0 and DQOL, before and after transplant, and scores were compared. Analysis was also adjusted for potential "confounders" such as graft dysfunction, insulin therapy and adverse events. DQOL: the Impact score significantly improved at all time points of the follow-up; satisfaction and worry scales also significantly improved at selected time points. Longitudinal analysis demonstrated that reintroduction of insulin had a negative effect on all three scales, but significant improvement in Impact scale persisted even after adjusting for this factor. HSQ 2.0: only the Health Perception scale preliminarily showed significant improvement at most time points. Longitudinal analysis showed loss of significance when insulin therapy was considered. Other scores were improved only at selected time points or not affected. Bodily pain scale showed deterioration at selected times. Interview: glucose control stability, not insulin independence, was reported as the main beneficial factor influencing QOL. In conclusion, islet transplantation has a positive influence on patients' QOL, despite chronic immunosuppression side effects. Re-introduction of insulin modifies QOL outcomes.

Calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus have well-recognized efficacy in organ transplantation but side effects of nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and beta-cell toxicity that can be particularly detrimental in islet transplantation. Neuro- and nephrotoxicity have been demonstrated in multiple islet transplant recipients despite the relatively low serum maintenance levels typically used (3-5 ng/ml). We describe a single patient in whom symptoms and signs of neurotoxicity necessitated substitution of tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which resulted in complete symptom resolution over the subsequent 9 months. Concomitantly noted were an almost immediate improvement in glycemic control and an improved response to stimulation testing, suggesting remission of tacrolimus-induced beta-cell toxicity and insulin resistance. At 18 months post-"switch," 30 months posttransplant, the patient remains insulin independent with good glycemic control. The goal to remove calcineurin inhibitors from regimens of islet transplantation is a worthy one.

Background: The success of sirolimus and low-dose tacrolimus in islet cell transplantation has influenced many transplant centers to utilize this novel regimen. The long-term safety and tolerability of this steroid-free immunosuppressive protocol for allogeneic islet transplantation has yet to be determined., Methods: We transplanted 26 adult patients with long standing type 1 diabetes mellitus between April 2000 and June 2004. Immunosuppression consisted of induction with daclizumab and maintenance therapy with tacrolimus and sirolimus. Adverse events (AEs) in patients were followed and graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0 (National Cancer Institute)., Results: To date, the majority of patients were able to remain on the immunosuppression combination for up to 22+/-11 months. Four patients were successfully converted to Mycophenolate Mofetil due to tacrolimus-related toxicity. Withdrawal from immunosuppression was decided in four patients due to hypereosinophilic syndrome, parvovirus infection, aspiration pneumonia, and severe depression, respectively. Six patients required filgrastim therapy for neutropenia. Transient elevation of liver enzymes was observed in most patients early after islet infusion. Increased LDL in 20 patients required medical treatment., Conclusion: There was a varying range of AEs, most of them mild and self-limiting; however, some required urgent medical attention. The majority of patients were able to tolerate and remain on this effective regimen. To date, no deaths, cytomegalovirus disease, graft-versus-host disease, or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease has been observed.

Following the success obtained with transplantation of fresh human islets under steroid-free immunosuppression, this trial evaluated the transplantation of islets that had undergone a period of in vitro culture and the potential of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) blockade to improve islet engraftment. Subjects included 16 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM); half were randomly assigned to receive Infliximab immediately preceding initial infusion. Immunosuppression consisted of daclizumab induction and sirolimus/tacrolimus maintenance. Out of 16 subjects 14 achieved insulin independence with one or two islet infusions; adverse events precluded completion in two. Without supplemental infusions, 11/14 (79%) subjects were insulin independent at 1 year, 6/14 (43%) at 18 months; these same subjects remain insulin independent at 33+/-6 months. While on immunosuppression, all patients maintained graft function. Out of 14 patients, 8 suffered chronic partial graft loss, likely immunological in nature, 5 of these received supplemental infusions. Currently, 11 subjects remain on immunosuppression, 8 (73%) are insulin independent, two with supplemental infusions. Insulin independent subjects demonstrated normalization of HbA1c, fructosamine and Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions (MAGE) values. No clinical benefit of infliximab was identified. These results demonstrate that transplantation of cultured human islet allografts results in reproducible insulin independence in all subjects under this immunosuppressive regimen, comparable to that of freshly transplanted islets (Edmonton protocol).

The relative inefficiency of the islet purification process may hamper obtaining enough islets for transplantation even with adequate pre-purification counts. In this study, we determined the effect of an additional purification step on total islet yields and pancreas utilization at our center. Twenty-five pancreata were processed using the automated method followed by continuous gradient purification (CGP), and the less pure islet fractions were subjected to additional rescue gradient purification (RGP). CGP and RGP islets were combined and transplanted into patients with type 1 diabetes. CGP and RGP islets showed no significant differences in cell viability, insulin secretion in vitro and function when transplanted into chemically diabetic mice. Mean RGP contribution to the final preparation was 27.9 +/- 19.9%. In 12 of 25 preparations, CGP yielded <5000 IEQ/kg of recipient body weight, and inclusion of RGP islets to the final preparation allowed to obtain the minimal islet number required for transplantation. Transplanted islets resulted in sustained C-peptide production, HbA1(C) normalization and insulin-independence or reduced insulin requirements. Taken together, our data suggest that RGP islets are comparable in terms of viability and potency to CGP islets. RGP may be of assistance in maximizing the number of islet preparations successfully used in transplant protocols.

This study evaluated the Medtronic MiniMed Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who underwent successful islet cell transplantation (ICT). The results are compared to standardized self-monitoring (SMBG) of hyperglycemia and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE). We studied 19 patients (mean age 40.0 +/- 6.7 years) in three groups: six patients post-ICT, seven patients awaiting ICT, and six normal volunteers (controls). Continuous glucose monitoring post-ICT showed remarkable glucose stability compared with patients awaiting ICT. The CGMS group showed modestly higher glucoses (mean 111.5 mg/dl) compared with controls (88 mg/dl). Postprandial glucoses in ICT recipients rarely exceeded 180 mg/dl and were similar to controls. There was no difference in asymptomatic hypoglycemia between control and post-ICT groups. However, a higher incidence of hypoglycemia was observed in patients awaiting ICT. HbA1c and MAGE pre- and post-ICT were 8.3 +/- 0.9% and 6 +/- 0.3% (p < 0.001) and 109 +/- 34 and 41 +/- 11 (p < 0.001), respectively. No complications were associated with CGMS. This study suggests ICT significantly improves metabolic control and rate of hypoglycemia when compared with controls and patients awaiting ICT. Similar improvement in metabolic control was observed with SMBG, HbA1c, and MAGE. Although CGMS was not demonstrated to be a superior tool for routine assessment in ICT, it is very helpful in special clinical situations.

Background: Transplantation of allogeneic tissues is becoming a wider practice for the replacement of organ function lost to congenital or acquired pathologies. Chronic immunosuppression remains a necessity to prevent organ rejection, despite increased risks of infection, organ toxicity, and malignancies. Abnormalities of female gonadal function in patients of reproductive age are recognized, however, pathological alterations of the reproductive system in patients treated with new generation immunosuppressive drugs are still poorly documented., Methods: We report herein our observations of abnormalities of the reproductive system in 13 female recipients of allogeneic islets for type 1 diabetes, under immunosuppression therapy based on daclizumab induction and tacrolimus/sirolimus maintenance., Results: Menstrual cycle alterations and clinically significant ovarian cysts were frequently observed in our patients, some requiring medical or surgical intervention. All ovarian cysts appeared of benign nature., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that pre- and posttransplant evaluation of female patients should include menstrual history, baseline pelvic ultrasound, and hormonal levels to assess the presence and monitor the progression of such alterations.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) serological status of transplant donors and recipients has important implications on antiviral prophylaxis, morbidity/mortality, donor selection and hospital stay. We evaluated CMV prevalence in our islet transplant candidates (ITC) in comparison with organ donors. We correlated the CMV serological status of our ITC with serology for Epstein-Barr virus and Parvovirus B19, auto-antibodies, patient's age, age at DM onset, duration of DM, gender, race, ABO group, HLA haplotype and C-peptide levels. Cytomegalovirus transmission after islet transplant using the Edmonton regimen was also evaluated. Cytomegalovirus seropositivity varied according to patient group, age, gender and race. Type 1 DM patients had reduced odds of CMV seropositivity when compared with organ donors. In all groups studied, older patients, females, and non-Caucasians were more likely to be CMV seropositive. In addition, no CMV reactivation, infection or disease was observed among our transplanted patients using this steroid-free regimen even after donor/recipient CMV mismatch.

Transplantation of allogeneic pancreatic islets for the treatment of patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is now a reality. The steady progress that has allowed for the recent successful clinical trials world-wide follows a steep learning curve and the perseverance of the international islet transplantation community. The Clinical Islet Transplant Program at the Diabetes Research Institute - University of Miami has contributed to the progress in the field with a 20-year track record. It has been a long journey and despite the intermediate success, more work is needed in order to achieve the ultimate goal of a safe and long-lasting treatment for patients with T1DM.

As islet cell transplantation gains increasing interest following results published by the Edmonton group, results that have been successfully reproduced by several centers nationwide and abroad, the need of guidelines to standardize the procedure becomes highly important. We detail the key steps of the infusion procedure utilizing a closed gravity fed bag system utilized at our institution since 1990, which consists of a 600-ml transfer bag and a 150-ml rinse bag connected via sterile tubing. The use of gravity allows for a control rate of infusion as well as providing a safety mechanism through natural reduction of flow that parallels any increase in portal pressure, therefore allowing the operator to prevent precipitous pressure rises. Reports on significant rise in portal pressures during islet cell infusion as well as portal vein thrombosis have been published. Infusion at these centers was carried out using a syringe method. Using our technique, portal vein thrombosis (partial or complete) was not detected in any of the infusions performed at our institution. This method may be of assistance to minimize some of the observed complications associated with islet transplant procedures and has now been adapted by most centers performing clinical islet transplantation.