Search

The authors regret that the world map presented in Figure 1 was incomplete. Please see the correct image for Fig 1 below. This has also been updated in the online article. [Figure presented] The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd

Superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) and nodular melanoma (NM) are the most common melanoma histologic subtypes and are characterized by different biological features. We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with advanced melanoma, treated with anti-PD-1 and/or anti-CTLA-4 at our center, with data available on primary tumor subtype. The primary objective was to assess the association between histologic subtype and patients' outcomes. In addition, we analyzed whole-exome and whole-transcriptome sequencing data of a cohort of advanced melanoma to identify genes and related pathways, characterized by significant differences between NMs and SSMs. Twenty-one patients with NM and 39 with SSM, treated with anti-PD-1(53/60) as monotherapy or combined with anti-CTLA-4 (7/60), were analyzed. All known clinical-pathologic prognostic factors were well balanced between NM and SSM groups, except for the ECOG-PS score. The overall response rate was 52.4% (95% confidence interval, 29.8-74.3) in the NMs group versus 20.5% (9.3-36.5) in the SSMs group (P-value=0.02). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were, respectively, 13.9 and 44.5 months in the NMs group versus only 3.2 and 12 months in SSMs group (progression-free survival P-value=0.032; overall survival P-value=0.002). Multivariable analysis adjusting for the ECOG-PS, confirmed similar results. Whole-exome and whole-transcriptome data of 28 NMs and 21 SSMs were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in terms of both TMB and frequency of mutation in any gene. A total of 266 genes were overexpressed in NMs as compared with SSMs, and enrichment-analysis revealed a significant enrichment (false discovery rate

Background: Compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for patients undergoing rectal surgery ranges from 43% to 73.6%. Reasons reported for not initiating or completing AC include onset of postoperative complications, drug toxicity, disease progression and/or patient preferences. Little is known regarding the impact of obesity on the compliance to AC in this setting. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed compliance to AC and treatment-related morbidity in 511 patients having undergone surgery with curative intent for rectal cancer in six Italian colorectal centers between January 2013 and December 2017. Results:70 patients were obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2). The proportion of open procedures (22.9% vs. 13.4%) and conversions (14.3% vs. 4.8%) was greater in obese compared to non-obese patients (p

Aim: To evaluate reconstruction failure (RF) rate in patients receiving implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and hypofractionated (HF) postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). Materials and methods: Stage II–III breast cancer patients, treated with HF-PMRT using intensity modulated radiotherapy were stratified in two groups according to IBR: single-stage direct-to-implant (DTI-group) and two-stage expander and implant (TE/I-group). Irradiated patients were matched with non-irradiated ones who underwent the same IBR during the same period. Prescription dose was 40.05 Gy/15 fractions to chest wall and infra/supraclavicular nodal region. Primary endpoint was RF defined as the need of major revisional surgery (MaRS) for implant removal or conversion to autologous reconstruction. Secondary endpoint was the rate of minor revisional surgeries (MiRS) including implant repositioning or substitution with another implant. Results: One hundred and seven irradiated patients (62 in TE/I-group, 45 in DTI-group) were matched with 107 non-irradiated subjects. Median follow-up was 4.2 years (0.1–6.1) In the TE/I setting, MaRS was performed in 8/62 irradiated patients (12.9%) of the irradiated TE/I group compared to 1/62 (1.6%) non-irradiated subjects (p = 0.015). In the DTI setting, MaRs occurred in 3/45 irradiated patients (6.7%) compared to 1/45 non-irradiated ones (2.2%) (p = 0.35). Overall MaRS rate was 10.3% in the irradiated group. MiRS was performed in 35.6% and 31.1% of the irradiated and non-irradiated DTI-groups (p = 0.65), respectively, and in 12.9% and 8.1% of the irradiated and non-irradiated TE/I groups (p = 0.38), respectively. Conclusions: Compared to the non-irradiated counterparts, the TE/I group showed higher rate of RF, while no statistically significant difference was observed for the DTI group. The use of hypofractionation and IMRT to implant-based IBR did not seem to increase the risk of RF which appeared to be in line with the literature.

Background: The correct approach for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is debatable, since multiple options are currently available. Percutaneous ablation (PA) is associated in some series to reduced morbidity compared to liver resection (LR), therefore, minimally invasive surgery may play a significant role in this setting. Methods: All consecutive patients treated by robotic liver resection (RLR) or PA between January 2014 and October 2019 for a newly diagnosed single HCC, less than 3 cm in size (very early/early stages according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)) on chronic liver disease or liver cirrhosis, were enrolled in this retrospective study. The aim of this study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes to define the best approach in this specific cohort. Results: 60 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 24 RLR and 36 PA. The two populations were homogeneous in terms of baseline characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences regarding the incidence of postoperative morbidity (RLR 38% vs. PA 19%, p = 0.15). The cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) was significantly higher in patients who underwent PA, with the one, two, and three years of CIR being 42%, 69%, and 73% in the PA group and 17%, 27%, and 27% in the RLR group, respectively. Conclusions: RLR provides a significantly higher potential of cure and tumor-related free survival in cases of newly diagnosed single HCCs smaller than 3 cm. Therefore, it can be considered as a first-line approach for the treatment of patients with those characteristics in high-volume centers with extensive experience in the field of hepatobiliary surgery and minimally invasive approaches.