Search

Background: ASP is hypothesized to decrease the risk of breast cancer (BRCA) and BRCA recurrences. Thus we performed an exploratory analysis of ASP and CC use within the NCIC CTG MA.27 adjuvant trial comparing exemestane (E;N=3789) to anastrozole (A; N=3787) with a factorial second randomization to CC or placebo (P). Neither A or E was superior in breast cancer outcomes. Baseline low-dose ASP use is an accepted surrogate of cardiovascular risk factors and was used as a stratification factor across all 4 arms. Randomization to CC-P was discontinued after 18 months (n = 1622) due to concerns of cardiac toxicity. Methods: Patients taking >81mg of ASP daily at baseline were ineligible for randomization and use of >81mg of ASP daily was not allowed. Women enrolled during CC randomization were included in the comparison of E and A, stratified by whether they had been randomized to CC [yes, no;N=1622] and concomitant low-dose ASP [ 81 mg/day (yes, no); N=2209]. Other stratification factors included: lymph-nodes (negative, positive, or unknown); prior adjuvant chemotherapy (yes, no). The primary endpoint, event-free- survival (EFS), was defined as time from randomization to time of locoregional or distant disease recurrence, new primary breast cancer, or death from any cause. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) defined as time from randomization to time of death from any cause and distant disease-free-survival (DDFS), defined as time from randomization to time of distant disease recurrence. Univariate (uni) assessment of CC and ASP use was assessed with stratified log-rank test, adjusting for lymph-node status and adjuvant chemotherapy and applied by intention-to-treat. Exploratory multivariate (multi) analyses (N = 1622) had forced inclusion of treatment and used step-wise forward stratified Cox modeling to examine the effects of CC, ASP use and baseline patient characteristics on outcomes; a factor was added with Wald test statistic p 0.05. Results: At median follow-up of 4.1 years, 186/1622 (11%) patients had an EFS event; 125 (8%) had died from any cause, and 80 (5%) had distant BRCA relapse. CC did not have significant uni association with outcomes: EFS p-value=0.92; OS p-value p = 0.56; DDFS p -value=0.55. ASP use was associated with worse EFS [p = 0.006, HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.12-1.96)], worse OS [p = 0.0002, HR 1.87 (95% CI (1.35-2.61)], and non-significant difference in DDFS (p = 0.72). CC had no multi association with EFS, OS or DDFS. ASP use had no multi association with EFS and DDFS (p > 0.05). However, ASP use had multi prognostic association with worse OS [p = 0.01; HR 1.67 (95% CI 1.13-2.49)]. Conclusions: Users of either CC or low dose ASP had similar DDFS to non-users in MA.27. As expected, low-dose ASP users (with presumptive cardiovascular risk factors) had worse OS than non-users. Inadequate numbers of patients randomized to CC and lack of randomization to aspirin leaves inadequate evidence from MA.27 to determine whether anti-inflammatories influence breast cancer outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The development of more potent selective oestrogen receptor antagonists and degraders (SERDs) that can be orally administered could help to address the limitations of current endocrine therapies. We report the primary and final analyses of the coopERA Breast Cancer study, designed to test whether giredestrant, a highly potent, non-steroidal, oral SERD, would show a stronger anti-proliferative effect than anastrozole after 2 weeks for oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, untreated early breast cancer., Methods: In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study, postmenopausal women were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older; had clinical T stage (cT)1c to cT4a-c (≥1·5 cm within cT1c) oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, untreated early breast cancer; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1; and baseline Ki67 score of at least 5%. The study was conducted at 59 hospital or clinic sites in 11 countries globally. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to giredestrant 30 mg oral daily or anastrozole 1 mg oral daily on days 1-14 (window-of-opportunity phase) via an interactive web-based system with permuted-block randomisation with block size of four. Randomisation was stratified by cT stage, baseline Ki67 score, and progesterone receptor status. A 16-week neoadjuvant phase comprised the same regimen plus palbociclib 125 mg oral daily on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, for four cycles. The primary endpoint was geometric mean relative Ki67 score change from baseline to week 2 in patients with complete central Ki67 scores at baseline and week 2 (window-of-opportunity phase). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04436744) and is complete., Findings: Between Sept 4, 2020, and June 22, 2021, 221 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the giredestrant plus palbociclib group (n=112; median age 62·0 years [IQR 57·0-68·5]) or anastrozole plus palbociclib group (n=109; median age 62·0 [57·0-67·0] years). 15 (7%) of 221 patients were Asian, three (1%) were Black or African American, 194 (88%) were White, and nine (4%) were unknown races. At data cutoff for the primary analysis (July 19, 2021), the geometric mean relative reduction of Ki67 from baseline to week 2 was -75% (95% CI -80 to -70) with giredestrant and -67% (-73 to -59) with anastrozole (p=0·043), meeting the primary endpoint. At the final analysis (data cutoff Nov 24, 2021), the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (29 [26%] of 112 in the giredestrant plus palbociclib group vs 29 [27%] of 109 in the anastrozole plus palbociclib group) and decreased neutrophil count (17 [15%] vs 16 [15%]). Serious adverse events occurred in five (4%) patients in the giredestrant plus palbociclib group and in two (2%) patients in the anastrozole plus palbociclib group. There were no treatment-related deaths. One patient died due to an adverse event in the giredestrant plus palbociclib group (myocardial infarction)., Interpretation: Giredestrant offers encouraging anti-proliferative and anti-tumour activity and was well tolerated, both as a single agent and in combination with palbociclib. Results justify further investigation in ongoing trials., Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests All authors received research support in the form of medical writing assistance from F Hoffmann-La Roche. SAH declares article processing charges paid by F Hoffmann-La Roche; funding for conducting the clinical trial from F Hoffmann-La Roche; contracted research paid to her institution from Ambrx, Amgen, Arvinas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celcuity, Cytomx, Daiichi Sankyo, Dantari, Dignitana, G1 Therapeutics, Gilead, Greenwich Life Sciences, GSK, Immunomedics, Eli Lilly, MacroGenics, Novartis, OBI Pharma, Orinove, Orum, Pfizer, Phoenix Molecular Designs, Pieris, PUMA, Radius, Samumed, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics/Seagen, and Zymeworks; speaking fees from Daiichi Sankyo; travel funding from Eli Lilly; uncompensated participation in a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Alliance and Quantum Leap Health; and unpaid scientific committee membership for Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO). AB declares grants from Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Sanofi, Radius Health, Immunomedics/Gilead, Daiichi Pharma/AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly; and consulting fees from Pfizer, Novartis, Genentech, Merck, Radius Health, Immunomedics/Gilead, Sanofi, Daiichi Pharma/AstraZeneca, Phillips, Eli Lilly, and Foundation Medicine. VQ declares funding support for attending meetings and/or travel from F Hoffmann-La Roche; participation in a steering committee for F Hoffmann-La Roche; and a research grant and funding, paid to her institution, from Celgene. YHP declares grants or contracts from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and MSD; consulting fees from Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Novartis, Menarini, Lilly, and MSD; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, Eisai, and Boryung; patents planned, issued, or pending from Hanmi; and participation in a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca, Eisai, Pfizer, and Novartis. IB declares grants or contracts from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Lilly, AstraZeneca, and Agendia; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Eisai, Celgene, Pfizer, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Grünenthal, Seagen, and Veracyte; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Eisai, Celgene, Pfizer, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Grünenthal, Seagen, and Veracyte; funding support for attending meetings and/or travel from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Lilly, and Pierre Fabre; and participation in a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Eisai, Celgene, Pfizer, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Grünenthal, Seagen, and Veracyte. HA declares grants or contracts from F Hoffmann-La Roche, MSD, and AstraZeneca. DAY declares grants or contracts, paid to her institution, from Ambrx, Amgen, BIOMARIN, Biothera Pharmaceuticals, Clovis Pharma, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Lilly, Roche/Genentech, G1 Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Innocrin Pharmaceuticals, MacroGenics, MedImmune, Medivation, Merck, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (USA), Pfizer, and Polyphor; and consulting fees, paid to their institution, from AstraZeneca, Athenex, Biotheranostics, G1 Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Immunomedics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi Aventis. OB declares a grant from TRIO for doing a study and for being an investigator, paid to OB directly and to his institution. GS is employed by TRIO. CX is employed by F Hoffmann-La Roche. EF is employed by Roche Products. TBC declares stock or stock options for F Hoffmann-La Roche; is employed by F Hoffmann-La Roche; and is named on a patent for PHESGO (F Hoffmann-La Roche). PDP-M declares stock or stock options for F Hoffmann-La Roche and is employed by Genentech. VL-V and JS declare stock or stock options for, and are employed by, F Hoffmann-La Roche. TMF and HMM declare stock or stock options for F Hoffmann-La Roche and are employed by Genentech. PAF declares fees, paid to his institution, for being on a steering committee for F Hoffmann-La Roche; grants or contracts paid to his institution from BioNTech, Cepheid, and Pfizer; consulting fees from Novartis, Pfizer, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Eisai, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, Agendia, Sanofi Aventis, Gilead, and Mylan; payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Novartis, Pfizer, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Eisai, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, Agendia, Sanofi Aventis, Gilead, and Mylan; and participation in a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Novartis, Pfizer, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Eisai, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, Agendia, Sanofi Aventis, Gilead, and Mylan., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To characterize pertuzumab pharmacokinetics (PK) in FeDeriCa (NCT03493854: fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection [PH FDC SC] versus intravenous pertuzumab plus trastuzumab); derive individual pertuzumab exposures in the PH FDC SC arm for subsequent pertuzumab exposure-response (ER) analyses; compare observed trastuzumab PK with predicted exposures from a previous SC trastuzumab model; assess whether pertuzumab affects trastuzumab PK; evaluate pertuzumab exposure-efficacy and -safety relationships and support the approved SC dosing regimen., Methods: Population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations were used to describe the data. Standard goodness-of-fit diagnostics and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks were used for model performance assessment. Covariates were included from previously reported models. ER analysis was conducted using logistic regression., Results: SC pertuzumab PK was described adequately by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption; significant covariates included in the final model were albumin, lean body weight, and Asian region; however, these appeared not to be clinically relevant. Trastuzumab concentrations were described adequately by the previous model; there was no evidence of a pertuzumab effect on trastuzumab PK as part of PH FDC SC and higher model-predicted pertuzumab exposure was not associated with differences in pathologic complete response rate or an increased probability of selected grade ≥ 3 adverse events of interest., Conclusion: The approved PH FDC SC dose [loading: 1200/600 mg pertuzumab/trastuzumab (15 mL); maintenance: 600 mg pertuzumab/trastuzumab (10 mL) and 2000 U/mL recombinant human hyaluronidase every 3 weeks] provides a positive benefit-risk profile with comparable efficacy and safety to intravenous pertuzumab plus trastuzumab., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

PERJETA (pertuzumab), administered with Herceptin (trastuzumab), is used in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. Pertuzumab is currently approved with an initial loading dose of 840 mg, followed by a 420-mg maintenance dose intravenously every 3 weeks. A reloading dose is required if there is a ≥6-week delay in treatment. In response to the potential treatment disruption due to COVID-19, the impact of dose delays and alternative dosing regimens on intravenous pertuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer treatment is presented. Simulations were conducted by using the validated population pharmacokinetic model for pertuzumab, and included (1) 4-, 6-, and 9-week dose delays of the 840 mg/420 mg every 3 weeks dosing regimen and (2) 840 mg/420 mg every 4 weeks and 840 mg every 6 weeks alternative dosing regimens. Simulations were compared with the currently approved pertuzumab dosing regimen. The simulations in 1000 virtual patients showed that a dose reload (840 mg) is required following a dose delay of ≥6 weeks to maintain comparable C trough (lowest concentration before the next dose is given) levels to clinical trials. The 840 mg/420 mg every 4 weeks and 840 mg every 6 weeks alternative dosing regimens decrease median steady-state C trough by ≈40% compared with the approved regimen, and <90% of patients will be above the target C trough . Thus, the alternative 840 mg/420 mg every 4 weeks and 840 mg every 6 weeks pertuzumab dosing regimens are not recommended. Flexibility for intravenous PERJETA-based regimens is available with an alternative route of pertuzumab administration (subcutaneous vs intravenous)., (© 2021 F. Hofmmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: A subcutaneous formulation of pertuzumab and trastuzumab with recombinant human hyaluronidase in one ready-to-use, fixed-dose combination vial (pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and hyaluronidase-zzxf) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on June 29, 2020. We report the primary analysis of the FeDeriCa study, which was designed to assess the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of the fixed-dose subcutaneous formulation compared to intravenous pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer in the neoadjuvant-adjuvant setting., Methods: FeDeriCa, a randomised, open-label, international, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 study, was done across 106 sites in 19 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, HER2-positive, operable, locally advanced, or inflammatory stage II-IIIC breast cancer, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 55% or more were randomly assigned (1:1), using a voice-based or web-based response system, to receive intravenous pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose, followed by 420 mg maintenance doses) plus intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg maintenance doses) or the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection (1200 mg pertuzumab plus 600 mg trastuzumab loading dose in 15 mL, followed by 600 mg pertuzumab plus 600 mg trastuzumab maintenance doses in 10 mL), both administered every 3 weeks with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by hormone receptor status, clinical stage, and chemotherapy regimen. The investigator selected one of the two protocol-approved standard chemotherapy regimens before randomisation. Four cycles of HER2-targeted therapy were administered concurrently with the taxane. After surgery, patients continued the HER2-targeted therapy to receive an additional 14 cycles (total of 18). The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of the cycle 7 pertuzumab serum trough concentration (C trough ; ie, cycle 8 predose pertuzumab concentration) within the fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous injection versus intravenous pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in the per-protocol pharmacokinetic population (all enrolled patients who adhered to prespecified criteria for pharmacokinetic assessment). Non-inferiority was concluded if the lower bound of the 90% CI of the geometric mean ratio was 0·8 or higher. The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of study medication, including chemotherapy or HER2-targeted therapy. Enrolment, neoadjuvant therapy, and surgery have been completed; adjuvant treatment and follow-up are ongoing. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03493854., Findings: Between June 14, 2018, and Dec 24, 2018, 252 patients were randomly assigned to the intravenous infusion group and 248 to the fixed-dose combination group. The geometric mean ratio of pertuzumab serum C trough subcutaneous to serum C trough intravenous was 1·22 (90% CI 1·14-1·31). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events occurring during neoadjuvant treatment with HER2-targeted therapy plus chemotherapy in 5% or more of patients were neutropenia (34 [13%] of 252 patients in the intravenous infusion group vs 35 [14%] of 248 patients in the fixed-dose combination group), decreased neutrophil count (31 [12%] vs 27 [11%]), febrile neutropenia (14 [6%] vs 16 [6%]), diarrhoea (12 [5%] vs 17 [7%]), and decreased white blood cell count (18 [7%] vs nine [4%]). At least one treatment-related serious adverse event was reported in 25 (10%) patients in the intravenous infusion group and 26 (10%) patients in the fixed-dose combination group. One patient in each treatment group had an adverse event that led to death (urosepsis in the intravenous infusion group and acute myocardial infarction in the fixed-dose combination group); neither death was related to HER2-targeted therapy., Interpretation: The study met its primary endpoint: the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection provides non-inferior cycle 7 pertuzumab serum C trough concentrations to intravenous pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant setting with comparable total pathological complete response rates, supporting the FDA approval. Safety was similar between treatment groups, and in line with other pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy trials. Follow-up is ongoing for long-term outcomes, including efficacy and long-term safety., Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab (both monoclonal antibodies targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]) has proven survival benefits when combined with chemotherapy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. The combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab together in 1 vial for subcutaneous (SC) administration is being developed as a ready-to-use formulation to reduce the treatment burden on patients while improving healthcare efficiency. An open-label, 2-part, phase Ib dose-finding study (NCT02738970) was undertaken in healthy male volunteers (part 1) and female patients with HER2-postive early breast cancer who had completed standard (neo)adjuvant treatment (part 2). This study aimed to identify an SC pertuzumab dose given with recombinant human hyaluronidase that results in comparable exposure to that of the intravenous (IV) pertuzumab dose, based on pertuzumab serum trough concentration and area under the serum concentration-time curve. Pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of a single dose of SC pertuzumab given alone or in a fixed-dose combination (comixed or coformulated) with trastuzumab were also assessed. A maintenance dose of 600 mg for SC pertuzumab resulted in an equivalent exposure to that of IV pertuzumab, and no new safety signals were identified for SC pertuzumab or trastuzumab. A loading dose of 1200 mg for SC pertuzumab was selected based on approximate dose proportionality. The PK and safety results support further development of a fixed-dose coformulation combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for SC administration, which will be investigated in an upcoming phase III trial in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer., (© 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Celecoxib and low-dose aspirin might decrease risk of breast cancer recurrence., Methods: In the Canadian Cancer Trials Group MA.27, postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients were randomly assigned (2 × 2) to adjuvant exemestane or anastrozole, and celecoxib or placebo. Low-dose aspirin of 81 mg or less was a stratification factor. Due to concerns about cardiac toxicity, celecoxib use was stopped in December 2004, while stratification by aspirin use was removed through protocol amendment. We examined the effects of celecoxib and low-dose aspirin on event-free survival (EFS), defined as time from random assignment to time of locoregional or distant disease recurrence, new primary breast cancer, or death from any cause; distant disease-free survival (DDFS); and overall survival (OS). All statistical tests were two-sided., Results: Random assignment to celecoxib (n = 811, 50.0%) or placebo (n = 811, 50.0%) was discontinued after 18 months (n = 1622). At a median of 4.1 years' follow-up, among 1622 patients, 186 (11.5%) patients had an EFS event: 80 (4.9%) had distant relapse, and 125 (7.7%) died from any cause. Celecoxib did not statistically significantly impact EFS, DDFS, or OS in univariate analysis (respectively, P = .92, P = .55, and P = .56) or multivariable analysis (respectively, P = .74, P = .60, and P = .76). Low-dose aspirin use (aspirin users n = 476, 21.5%; non-aspirin users n = 1733, 78.5%) was associated in univariate analyses with worse EFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12 to 1.96, P = 0.006) and worse OS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.35 to 2.61, P < .001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics and treatment arm, aspirin use showed no statistical association with EFS (P = .08) and DDFS (P = .82), but was associated with statistically worse OS (HR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.49, P = .01)., Conclusion: Random assignment to short-term (≤18 months) celecoxib as well as use of low-dose aspirin showed no effect on DDFS and EFS in multivariable analysis. Low-dose aspirin increased "all-cause" mortality, presumably because of higher preexisting cardiovascular risks.

We sought to uncover genetic drivers of hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) breast cancer, using a targeted next-generation sequencing approach for detecting expressed gene rearrangements without prior knowledge of the fusion partners. We identified intergenic fusions involving driver genes, including PIK3CA, AKT3, RAF1 , and ESR1 , in 14% (24/173) of unselected patients with advanced HR + breast cancer. FISH confirmed the corresponding chromosomal rearrangements in both primary and metastatic tumors. Expression of novel kinase fusions in nontransformed cells deregulates phosphoprotein signaling, cell proliferation, and survival in three-dimensional culture, whereas expression in HR + breast cancer models modulates estrogen-dependent growth and confers hormonal therapy resistance in vitro and in vivo Strikingly, shorter overall survival was observed in patients with rearrangement-positive versus rearrangement-negative tumors. Correspondingly, fusions were uncommon (<5%) among 300 patients presenting with primary HR + breast cancer. Collectively, our findings identify expressed gene fusions as frequent and potentially actionable drivers in HR + breast cancer. Significance: By using a powerful clinical molecular diagnostic assay, we identified expressed intergenic fusions as frequent contributors to treatment resistance and poor survival in advanced HR + breast cancer. The prevalence and biological and prognostic significance of these alterations suggests that their detection may alter clinical management and bring to light new therapeutic opportunities. Cancer Discov; 8(3); 336-53. ©2017 AACR. See related commentary by Natrajan et al., p. 272 See related article by Liu et al., p. 354 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 253 ., (©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose To assess the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab plus capecitabine with or without pertuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer who experienced disease progression during or after trastuzumab-based therapy and received a prior taxane. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to arm A: trastuzumab 8 mg/kg → 6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks plus capecitabine 1,250 mg/m 2 twice a day (2 weeks on, 1 week off, every 3 weeks); or arm B: pertuzumab 840 mg → 420 mg once every 3 weeks plus trastuzumab at the same dose and schedule as arm A plus capecitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 on the same schedule as arm A. The primary end point was independent review facility-assessed progression-free survival (IRF PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety. Hierarchical testing procedures were used to control type I error for statistical testing of IRF PFS, OS, and objective response rate. Results Randomly assigned (intent-to-treat) populations were 224 and 228 patients in arms A and B, respectively. Median IRF PFS at 28.6 and 25.3 months' median follow-up was 9.0 v 11.1 months (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.02; P = .0731) and interim OS was 28.1 v 36.1 months (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.90). The most common adverse events (all grades; incidence of ≥ 10% in either arm and ≥ 5% difference between arms) were hand-foot syndrome, nausea, and neutropenia in arm A, and diarrhea, rash, and nasopharyngitis in arm B. Conclusion The addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab and capecitabine did not significantly improve IRF PFS. An 8-month increase in median OS to 36.1 months with pertuzumab was observed. Statistical significance for OS cannot be claimed because of the hierarchical testing of OS after the primary PFS end point; however, the magnitude of OS difference is in keeping with prior experience of pertuzumab in metastatic breast cancer. No new safety signals were identified.

Background: In the randomised, parallel assignment, open-label, phase 3 TH3RESA study, progression-free survival was significantly longer with trastuzumab emtansine versus treatment of physician's choice in previously treated patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. We report results from the final overall survival analysis of the TH3RESA trial., Methods: Eligible patients for the TH3RESA trial were men and women (aged ≥18 years) with centrally confirmed HER2-positive advanced breast cancer previously treated with both trastuzumab and lapatinib (advanced setting) and a taxane (any setting) and with progression on two or more HER2-directed regimens in the advanced setting. Patients had to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 50%, and adequate organ function. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) by an interactive voice and web response system with permuted block randomisation in blocks of six to receive trastuzumab emtansine (3·6 mg/kg intravenously every 21 days) or treatment of physician's choice administered per local practice. Randomisation was stratified by world region, number of previous regimens for advanced breast cancer, and presence of visceral disease. On Sept 12, 2012, the study protocol was amended to allow patients with disease progression to crossover from treatment of physician's choice to trastuzumab emtansine. The coprimary endpoints for TH3RESA were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. We report results from a preplanned second interim analysis of overall survival, which was planned for when approximately 67% (n=330) of 492 expected deaths had occurred. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01419197., Findings: Between Sept 14, 2011, and Nov 19, 2012, 602 patients were enrolled from 146 centres in 22 countries and randomly assigned to trastuzumab emtansine (n=404) or treatment of physician's choice (n=198). At data cutoff (Feb 13, 2015), 93 (47%) of 198 patients in the physician's choice group had crossed over to trastuzumab emtansine. Overall survival was significantly longer with trastuzumab emtansine versus treatment of physician's choice (median 22·7 months [95% CI 19·4-27·5] vs 15·8 months [13·5-18·7]; hazard ratio 0·68 [95% CI 0·54-0·85]; p=0·0007). As the stopping boundary for overall survival was crossed, this overall survival analysis serves as the final and confirmatory analysis of overall survival and the study was terminated according to the protocol. The incidence of grade 3 or worse adverse events was 161 (40%) of 403 patients in the trastuzumab emtansine group and 87 (47%) of 184 patients in the treatment of physician's choice group. Of the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events (affecting ≥2% of patients in either group), those with a 3% or greater difference in incidence between groups that were more frequent with treatment of physician's choice than with trastuzumab emtansine were diarrhoea (three [1%] of 403 patients in the trastuzumab emtansine group vs eight [4%] of 184 patients in the treatment of physician's choice group), neutropenia (ten [3%] vs 29 [16%]), and febrile neutropenia (one [<1%] vs seven [4%]); whereas those that were more frequent with trastuzumab emtansine were thrombocytopenia (24 [6%] of 403 patients vs five [3%] of 184 patients) and haemorrhage of any type (17 [4%] of 403 vs one [<1%] of 184). Serious adverse events were reported in 102 (25%) of 403 patients in the trastuzumab emtansine group and 41 (22%) of 184 in the physician's choice group. Deaths from adverse events were reported in three patients (2%) in the physician's choice group (of which one was judged to be treatment related) and nine (2%) in the trastuzumab emtansine group (of which three were judged to be treatment related)., Interpretation: In patients who had progressed on two or more HER2-directed regimens, trastuzumab emtansine treatment resulted in a significant improvement in overall survival versus treatment of physician's choice. These data further solidify the role of trastuzumab emtansine in the management of patients with previously treated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, and validate HER2 as a therapeutic target even after multiple lines of previous therapy., Funding: F Hoffman-La Roche/Genentech., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Recent ASCO/CAP guidelines focus on decision making associated with the presence/absence of continuous breast biomarkers. Statistical standardization (SS) is demonstrated as a method to evaluate the effects of continuous RT-PCR biomarker expression levels on breast cancer outcomes. MA.14 allocated 667 postmenopausal patients to tamoxifen based on locally determined ER/PR. Of 299 available patient tumor samples, 292 passed internal quality control. All tumors were centrally assessed by RT-PCR ER/PR/HER2 with each biomarker's z-scores categorized: ≥1.0 standard deviation (SD) below mean; <1.0 SD below mean; ≤1.0 SD above mean; >1.0 SD above mean. Log-rank statistics tested univariate differences in breast cancer relapse-free survival (RFS). Continuous SS-ER/PR/HER2 were assessed in multivariate Cox step-wise forward regression, adding a factor if p ≤ 0.05. Sensitivity analyses examined an external HER2+ cut-point of 1.32. Patients whose tumors were tested were representative of the MA.14 population (p values = 0.18-0.90). At 9.8 years median follow-up, SS-ER did not univariately impact RFS (p = 0.31). SS-PR values above the mean (z ≥ 0.0) had the best univariate RFS (p = 0.03). SS-HER2 also univariately impacted RFS (p = 0.004) with lowest (z-scores ≤ -1.0) and highest (z-scores > 1.0) having shortest RFS. Multivariate stratified/unstratified Cox models indicated patients with T1 tumors (p = 0.02/p = 0.0002) and higher SS-PR (p = 0.02/p = 0.01) had longer RFS; node-negative patients had better RFS (in unstratified analysis, p < 0.0001). Local ER/PR status did not impact RFS (p > 0.05). Patients with SS HER2+ ≥ 1.32 had worse RFS (univariate, p = 0.05; multivariate, p = 0.06). We demonstrated that higher SS-PR, and SS HER2 levels, measured by RT-PCR impacted breast cancer RFS outcomes. Evaluation in other trials may provide support for this methodology.

Background: Treatment of breast cancer with aromatase inhibitors is associated with damage to bones. NCIC CTG MA.27 was an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial in which women with breast cancer were assigned to one of two adjuvant oral aromatase inhibitors-exemestane or anastrozole. We postulated that exemestane-a mildly androgenic steroid-might have a less detrimental effect on bone than non-steroidal anastrozole. In this companion study to MA.27, we compared changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine and total hip between patients treated with exemestane and patients treated with anastrozole., Methods: In MA.27, postmenopausal women with early stage hormone (oestrogen) receptor-positive invasive breast cancer were randomly assigned to exemestane 25 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg, daily. MA.27B recruited two groups of women from MA.27: those with BMD T-scores of -2·0 or more (up to 2 SDs below sex-matched, young adult mean) and those with at least one T-score (hip or spine) less than -2·0. Both groups received vitamin D and calcium; those with baseline T-scores of less than -2·0 also received bisphosphonates. The primary endpoints were percent change of BMD at 2 years in lumbar spine and total hip for both groups. We analysed patients according to which aromatase inhibitor and T-score groups they were allocated to but BMD assessments ceased if patients deviated from protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00354302., Findings: Between April 24, 2006, and May 30, 2008, 300 patients with baseline T-scores of -2·0 or more were accrued (147 allocated exemestane, 153 anastrozole); and 197 patients with baseline T-scores of less than -2·0 (101 exemestane, 96 anastrozole). For patients with T-scores greater than -2·0 at baseline, mean change of bone mineral density in the spine at 2 years did not differ significantly between patients taking exemestane and patients taking anastrozole (-0·92%, 95% CI -2·35 to 0·50 vs -2·39%, 95% CI -3·77 to -1·01; p=0·08). Respective mean loss in the hip was -1·93% (95% CI -2·93 to -0·93) versus -2·71% (95% CI -4·32 to -1·11; p=0·10). Likewise for those who started with T-scores of less than -2·0, mean change of spine bone mineral density at 2 years did not differ significantly between the exemestane and anastrozole treatment groups (2·11%, 95% CI -0·84 to 5·06 vs 3·72%, 95% CI 1·54 to 5·89; p=0·26), nor did hip bone mineral density (2·09%, 95% CI -1·45 to 5·63 vs 0·0%, 95% CI -3·67 to 3·66; p=0·28). Patients with baseline T-score of -2·0 or more taking exemestane had two fragility fractures and two other fractures, those taking anastrozole had three fragility fractures and five other fractures. For patients who had baseline T-scores of less than -2·0 taking exemestane, one had a fragility fracture and four had other fractures, whereas those taking anastrozole had five fragility fractures and one other fracture., Interpretation: Our results demonstrate that adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors can be considered for breast cancer patients who have T-scores less than -2·0., Funding: Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, Pfizer, Canadian Institutes of Health Research., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Cancer is one of the major non-communicable diseases posing a threat to world health. Unfortunately, improvements in socioeconomic conditions are usually associated with increased cancer incidence. In this Commission, we focus on China, India, and Russia, which share rapidly rising cancer incidence and have cancer mortality rates that are nearly twice as high as in the UK or the USA, vast geographies, growing economies, ageing populations, increasingly westernised lifestyles, relatively disenfranchised subpopulations, serious contamination of the environment, and uncontrolled cancer-causing communicable infections. We describe the overall state of health and cancer control in each country and additional specific issues for consideration: for China, access to care, contamination of the environment, and cancer fatalism and traditional medicine; for India, affordability of care, provision of adequate health personnel, and sociocultural barriers to cancer control; and for Russia, monitoring of the burden of cancer, societal attitudes towards cancer prevention, effects of inequitable treatment and access to medicine, and a need for improved international engagement., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A high ongoing recurrence rate in patients with endocrine responsive breast cancer provides the rationale for offering endocrine treatment for more than five years. The MA.17 study, comparing the aromatase inhibitor (AI) letrozole for five years after an initial five years of tamoxifen to no further treatment, provided the proof-of-principle for extended endocrine treatment. These results have meanwhile been confirmed by several other studies and an EBCTCG meta-analysis. More recently, data from the ATLAS trial, comparing 10 to five years of tamoxifen, have been published, similarly showing a benefit for longer endocrine treatment with tamoxifen. In postmenopausal women -including those who had been premenopausal at initial diagnosis - a cross-trial comparison of ATLAS and the AI studies indicates superiority of switching to letrozole versus ongoing tamoxifen, similar to superiority of the AIs over tamoxifen in the metastatic and early breast cancer settings., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Non-communicable diseases, including cancer, are overtaking infectious disease as the leading health-care threat in middle-income and low-income countries. Latin American and Caribbean countries are struggling to respond to increasing morbidity and death from advanced disease. Health ministries and health-care systems in these countries face many challenges caring for patients with advanced cancer: inadequate funding; inequitable distribution of resources and services; inadequate numbers, training, and distribution of health-care personnel and equipment; lack of adequate care for many populations based on socioeconomic, geographic, ethnic, and other factors; and current systems geared toward the needs of wealthy, urban minorities at a cost to the entire population. This burgeoning cancer problem threatens to cause widespread suffering and economic peril to the countries of Latin America. Prompt and deliberate actions must be taken to avoid this scenario. Increasing efforts towards prevention of cancer and avoidance of advanced, stage IV disease will reduce suffering and mortality and will make overall cancer care more affordable. We hope the findings of our Commission and our recommendations will inspire Latin American stakeholders to redouble their efforts to address this increasing cancer burden and to prevent it from worsening and threatening their societies., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Recent interest of many investigators is focused on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family, because of their potential role in the pathogenesis and progression of breast cancer. Paraffin tumor sections were collected retrospectively from 181 breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2003. Immunohistochemical staining with ErbB-1, ErbB-2, ErbB-3, and ErbB-4 monoclonal antibodies was performed. The ErbB expression was correlated with the other clinicopathological variables. Overexpression of ErbB-1, ErbB-2, ErbB-3, and ErbB-4 was observed in 20.6, 18.2, 14.3, and 5.7% cases, respectively. Overexpression of ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 was associated with poor prognostic features and decreased 5-year disease-free survival. The patients with co-overexpression of ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 had a shorter DFS, although this difference was not statistically significant. ErbB-1 overexpression may indicate a subset of patients with a poor disease prognosis. Assays for ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 may be more useful than a single assay in predicting prognosis of a breast cancer patient.