1. Evaluation of epoxy ether fixed bovine arterial grafts for mutagenic potential.
- Author
-
Lohre JM, Baclig L, Wickham E, Guida S, Farley J, Thyagarajan K, Tu R, and Quijano RC
- Subjects
- Animals, Arteries transplantation, Cattle, Mutagenicity Tests, Sister Chromatid Exchange, Bioprosthesis adverse effects, Blood Vessel Prosthesis adverse effects, Epoxy Resins toxicity, Mutation, Polypropylenes toxicity
- Abstract
Two epoxy ether compounds [glycerol polyglycidyl ether (Denacol EX-313) and ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (Denacol EX-810)] are under consideration as alternatives to glutaraldehyde for use in the processing of an arterial graft. The two are utilized as cross-linking and sterilant agents, respectively. Epoxy resins are multifunctional alkylating agents, and bifunctional alkylating epoxide solutions are known to be mutagenic. The correlation between mutagenic potential and carcinogenicity, in addition to evidence that diepoxides are carcinogenic in mice and rats, prompted the evaluation of the mutagenic potential of the epoxy treated, clinically rinsed graft. Ames and sister chromatid exchange (SCE) test procedures were used to assess mutagenic potential. Normal saline and distilled water were selected as the most physiologically representative and procedurally acceptable extraction mediums for the Ames and SCE tests, respectively. The results of the Ames and SCE tests in both the activated and non activated systems indicated that there were no statistically significant differences detected between various test article concentrates and the spontaneous mutation controls for both the activated and non activated systems. The epoxy treated graft was determined to be non mutagenic and demonstrated no dose related responses by these methods.
- Published
- 1993