Search

Purpose: There is currently limited information available in the orthopaedic surgery literature regarding the appropriate management of symptomatic partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials of all published literature pertaining to the arthroscopic management of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Inclusion criteria were all studies that reported clinical outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of both articular-sided and bursal-sided lesions using a validated outcome scoring system and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Data abstracted from the selected studies included tear type and location (articular v bursal sided), treatment approach, postoperative rehabilitation protocol, outcome scores, patient satisfaction, and postoperative imaging results. Results: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for the final analysis. Seven of the studies treated partial-thickness rotator cuff tears with debridement with or without an associated subacromial decompression, 3 performed a takedown and repair, 5 used a transtendon repair technique, and 1 used a transosseous repair method. Among the 16 studies reviewed, excellent postoperative outcomes were reported in 28.7% to 93% of patients treated. In all 12 studies with available preoperative baseline data, treatment resulted in significant improvement in shoulder symptoms and function. For high-grade lesions, the data support arthroscopic takedown and repair, transtendon repairs, and transosseous repairs, with all 3 techniques providing a high percentage of excellent results. Debridement of partial-thickness tears of less than 50% of the tendon's thickness with or without a concomitant acromioplasty also results in good to excellent surgical outcomes; however, a 6.5% to 34.6% incidence of progression to full-thickness tears is present. Conclusions: This systematic review of 16 clinical studies showed that significant variation is present in the results obtained after the arthroscopic management of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. What can be supported by the available data is that tears that involve less than 50% of the tendon can be treated with good results by debridement of the tendon with or without a formal acromioplasty, although subsequent tear progression may occur. When the tear is greater than 50%, surgical intervention focusing on repair has been successful. There is no evidence to suggest a differential in outcome for tear completion and repair versus transtendon repair of these lesions because both methods have been shown to result in favorable outcomes. Level Of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Although a tibial inlay technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is advantageous, metallic screw fixation of the bone block is required. This may pose problems for future surgery (eg, osteotomies, total knee replacement). HYPOTHESIS: There is no significant difference in the biomechanical integrity of bone block fixation using stainless steel versus bioabsorbable screw fixation of the tibial inlay graft in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Fourteen human cadaveric knees were randomized to receive either stainless steel or bioabsorbable screw fixation of a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Cyclic tensile testing of each construct was performed, followed by a load-to-failure test. Digital video digitization was used to optically determine tendon graft deformation. RESULTS: Cyclic creep deformation showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .8). The failure load (stainless steel, 461 +/- 231 N; bioabsorbable, 638 +/- 492 N; P = .7) and linear stiffness (stainless steel, 116 +/- 22 N/mm, bioabsorbable, 106 +/- 44 N/mm; P = .6) also showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. Optically measured graft deformation was not significant for distal (P = .7) and midsubstance (P = .8) regions, while proximal deformation was significantly higher for bioabsorbable fixation (P = .02). All samples failed at the tibial insertion site with the tibial bone block fracturing at the screws. CONCLUSION: Bioabsorbable screw fixation using a tibial inlay technique does not compromise the strength and stiffness characteristics afforded by metallic fixation. From a biomechanical perspective, bioabsorbable screws are a viable alternative to metal in the context of tibial inlay reconstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Use of bioabsorbable fixation can potentially eliminate future hardware problems after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a tibial inlay technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High ankle sprains are not as common as low ankle sprains, but they are a significant injury, and the diagnosis may be challenging. The primary role of the syndesmosis is the maintain the relationship of the talus to the tibia under physiological loads. to accomplish this, the distal tibiofibular joint must maintain its stability. The syndesmosis is injured most often with external rotation at the ankle joint while the foot is dorsiflexed and pronated. On physical examination, tenderness is located in the area of the anterior syndesmosis. There are several special tests for syndesmosis injuries. Radiographic assessment is helpful. The usefulness of classification systems is not well defined. The optimal rehabilitation program is unknown. Rehabilitation generally is divided into phases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in comparing the efficacy of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Challenging this comparison, however, has been the lack of an established consensus on the success of single-bundle reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: The current outcomes of single-bundle reconstruction can be clarified from a large unbiased body of evidence for future comparisons with double-bundle reconstructions. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review of 11 randomized, controlled trials comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafting is reported. The respective outcomes of each group were combined to assist the orthopaedic surgeon in assessing the current success of single-bundle reconstruction. The primary factors assessed were tibial subluxation and side-to-side differences in laxity. Secondary outcomes included concomitant injuries and treatments, complications, graft failure, range of motion, and radiographic evidence of degenerative changes. RESULTS: In this review of 1024 single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, 495 concomitant meniscal tears, 95 chondral injuries, and 2 posterior cruciate ligament tears were noted. The complication rate was 6%, and graft failure 4%. Reported pivot-shift test results were negative in 81% of cases; reported Lachman tests were negative in 59% cases; and KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side differences were

Differentiation between low and high ankle sprains is critical to delivering appropriate care. The classic mechanism for a low ankle sprain is inversion and plantar flexion. A history of ankle ligament injury predisposes to recurring sprains. The ankle anterior drawer test may be used to evaluate ligamentous instability. Plain radiographs of the foot and ankle may be indicated in a patient who has an acute ankle injury. Clinicians often use the Ottawa ankle rules to determine the need for radiographs. In the acute phase, the goals of treatment are to alleviate pain, reduce swelling, and protect the ankle from further injury. NSAIDs and rehabilitation are important components of management. Primary prevention may be possible with strengthening and balance programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Osteotomies at an angle of 45 degrees to the long axis of the glenoid were originally used in a cadaveric model to simulate the bone loss that can occur clinically in anterior instability of the shoulder. However, this type of glenoid defect is not consistent with the usual clinical scenario, in which bone loss occurs nearly parallel (at 0 degrees) to the long axis of the glenoid. PURPOSE: Our objectives were to compare the amount of glenoid bone loss measured after a 45 degrees glenoid osteotomy with that after a 0 degrees osteotomy and to determine differences in bone loss measurement from 2 different posterior shoulder portals. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Glenoids of 14 embalmed cadaveric shoulders (mean age, 81 years; range, 56-90) were mounted in a custom shoulder holder, and 2 posterior portals (2 and 3 o'clock) were fixed into place. The area of a best-fit circle of the inferior portion of the glenoid was digitally calculated, and 2 sequential osteotomies of 12.5% and 25% of anteroinferior glenoid bone loss area were created. Two different types of osteotomies were created: group 1, 'inverted-pear' bone loss (45 degrees to the long axis of the glenoid); and group 2, 'clinical' bone loss osteotomy (0 degrees to the long axis of the glenoid). Measurements of bone loss were performed based on the bare spot method from 2 simulated posterior portals at 2 and 3 o'clock using a calibrated probe and digital calipers. The osteotomy was measured in 3 different locations (upper, middle, and lower thirds). RESULTS: In the 12.5% bone loss model, bone loss measurements for both groups were significantly higher than expected (22.2%-23.1% in group 1, 17.4%-17.9% in group 2; P = .031-.049). In the 25% bone loss model, the mean measured bone loss was 27.8% in group 1 and 27.5% in group 2; however, bone loss measurements varied significantly in group 1 based on measurement location along the osteotomy (upper third, 12.3%; middle third, 31.5%; lower third, 39.8% loss) (P = .01-.0001). In group 2, the bone loss measurements were less varied (23.5%-30.3%). There were no differences between the location of the posterior portal (2 vs 3 o'clock) in determination of glenoid bone loss for both the 12.5% and 25% osteotomies. CONCLUSION: Glenoid bone loss determination in a 45 degrees osteotomy model significantly overestimates the amount of true glenoid bone loss. However, in a 0 degrees clinical bone loss simulation model, the arthroscopic bare spot method of bone loss determination was sufficiently accurate at all 3 areas (upper, middle, and lower third) of bone loss. Both the 2-o'clock and 3-o'clock posterior portals were accurate to determine the amount of glenoid bone loss as referenced from the bare spot. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Arthroscopic determination of glenoid bone loss is more accurate than what has been previously described with the 45 degrees simulation model. Measurement of glenoid bone loss from either the 2-o'clock or 3-o'clock posterior portal is accurate in a clinical bone loss model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multi-suture fixation of supraspinatus rotator cuff tears provides excellent fixation and biomechanical failure characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment of osteochondritis dissecans lesions remains controversial. Twelve adolescent patients, with average 6-year follow-up, underwent compression screw fixation of unstable Cahill Type-2C osteochondritis dissecans lesions. Postoperatively, patients were evaluated with several functional tests and scoring systems, including Lysholm, IKDC, and KOOS. All lesions healed, and no clinical or radiographic evidence of degenerative disease was noted. No significant differences in thigh girth, range of motion, stability, or single-leg-hop distance was observed when compared to the unaffected, contralateral extremity. This technique is appropriate and efficacious for the treatment of unstable osteochondritis dissecans lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Compartment syndrome in the lower leg, most commonly related to exertion, has been well documented in athletes. However, compartment syndrome resulting from trauma is rare in athletes, as in this case of a 17-year-old male goalie who sustained a direct blow to his thigh during a soccer game. He was successfully treated with early fasciotomy and delayed wound closure, and he made a full recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are 5 broad diagnostic categories of patellofemoral pathology. Narrowing the list of possible diagnoses to one category helps determine appropriate treatment. Patients with an acute traumatic patellofemoral condition have a history of a specific precipitating event. Surgical intervention may be required for definitive management of acute injuries. Patients with overuse injuries often complain of activity-related aching in the anterior knee. Appropriate supervised physical therapy may provide effective treatment. Degenerative processes can affect the articular cartilage of the patellofemoral joint on the patellar or trochlear side. Symptomatic disease limited to the patellofemoral joint represents a significant management challenge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with patellofemoral pathology present with a variety of nonspecific complaints, making diagnosis difficult at times. A basic comprehension of patellofemoral anatomy helps physicians explain the patient's symptoms. The history taking should focus on the nature of the symptoms, onset, duration, anatomic location, and any exacerbating or remitting factors. Complaints of pain are most common. Duration of symptoms, location of pain, and identification of specific activities that exacerbate the symptoms are important. A joint-specific physical examination should include observation, palpation of precise anatomic areas, manual motor testing and assessment of muscle tightness, and evaluation of patellofemoral joint dynamics. For routine imaging, a standard plain x-ray film series of 3 views should be obtained. Use of MRI may be warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Forceful eccentric contraction may cause a partial or complete rupture of a vulnerable large tendon, especially in middle-aged men. When diagnosing a large-tendon rupture, it is essential to rule out a systemic illness or history of local or systemic corticosteroid or anabolic steroid use, because any of these may lead to poor tendon quality and increased risk for rupture. Ultrasound or MRI may help confirm the diagnosis. Treatment is generally surgical with anatomic repair. Return to sport depends on the patient's age, lifestyle, tendon involved, and medical comorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting reports of allograft performance, immune response, tissue incorporation, and rerupture rates when used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of a fresh-frozen, nonirradiated, patellar tendon allograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients who underwent endoscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tissue a minimum of 2 years ago were evaluated with physical examinations, the KT-1000 arthrometer, functional testing, radiographic evaluation, subjective assessment, and outcomes tools. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (60 knees) were evaluated at an average of 51 months after surgery. Ninety-four percent of patients were mostly or completely satisfied. A negative pivot shift test result was noted in 90% of subjects. The KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side differences were < or =3 mm in 95% of patients, and no patient exceeded 5 mm. The mean International Knee Documentation Committee score was 78 (SD = 19), and the mean Lysholm score was 82 (SD = 17). There were no clinical symptoms consistent with graft rejection or infection. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated infrequent significant tunnel widening. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a fresh-frozen, nonirradiated allograft for primary reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament is a successful procedure both subjectively and functionally for restoring stability in patients selected for allograft reconstruction. In the patients selected for this surgical procedure, clinical, arthrometric stability testing, and subjective satisfaction were comparable to our previously published cohort studies using patellar tendon autograft at similar postoperative follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High ankle sprains, or syndesmotic injuries, are a distinct entity from the more common inversion ankle sprain. Dorsiflexion of the ankle, external rotation of the leg, or a combination of both can disrupt the syndesmotic ligament complex, including the anterior and posterior tibiofibular ligaments. Diagnostic maneuvers, such as the squeeze test and the external rotation test, plus radiographic findings help make the diagnosis. Less severe sprains can be treated nonoperatively with protected weight bearing, but grade 3 sprains require surgical anatomic reduction of the syndesmotic joint. If misdiagnosed or managed incorrectly, syndesmotic injuries can lead to unfavorable late sequelae. Clinicians should set realistic expectations for a long recovery period and slow return to sports. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We retrospectively reviewed the results of 97 patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using an arthroscopically assisted two-incision technique without extraarticular augmentation at an intermediate followup of 5 to 9 years postoperatively. Evaluation included detailed history, physical examination, functional testing, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, multiple scoring systems, and radiographs. The results were compared with those from a previous study that evaluated a smaller patient cohort using the identical surgical technique at a 2- to 4-year followup. The postoperative physical examination and KT-1000 arthrometer results were statistically improved when compared with preoperative findings. A negative pivot shift result was noted in 83% of patients, and a 1+ result in 17% of patients. Seventy percent of patients had < 3 mm difference on manual maximum side-to-side testing. Functional testing averaged less than 2% asymmetry for vertical jump, single-legged hop, or timed 6-meter hop. The Tegner activity level was significantly improved from prereconstruction ratings and similar to preinjury ratings. The mean Lysholm score was 87. The modified Hospital for Special Surgery scores resulted in good or excellent results in 82% of the patients (mean, 87 points). The mean Noyes sports function score was 89, and the reoperation rate for a symptomatic knee flexion contracture was 12%. Ninety-seven percent of patients indicated that they would undergo the procedure again. When compared with this same population at 2 to 4 years, we saw no deterioration in scoring scale results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We conducted a prospective study to evaluate bone bruises, or trabecular microfractures, associated with isolated medial collateral ligament injuries. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 65 patients with isolated medial collateral ligament injuries determined by physical examination and imaging studies. Of these 65 patients, 29 (45%) had associated trabecular microfractures. Follow-up images were completed at various intervals on 24 of these 29 patients (83%). Complete resolution of these lesions was observed in all cases. This process appears to occur as a result of gradual diffusion over a period of 2 to 4 months. Bone bruises associated with medial collateral ligament injuries are approximately one-half as common as bone bruises associated with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. However, medial collateral ligament-associated trabecular microfractures may be a better natural history model because these injuries are treated nonoperatively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We evaluated the comparability of four commonly used shoulder scoring systems in the United States. Fifty-two patients had 53 shoulder stabilization procedures. Surgical procedures included 34 open Bankart-type repairs, 15 capsular shifts, and 4 arthroscopic stabilizations. Results were assessed using the following scales: 1) Rowe, 2) modified-Rowe, 3) University of California at Los Angeles, and 4) the pre-1994 American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale. No consensus has been reached on the relative value of these systems. We observed significant variations using these systems. A majority of our patients (85%) had excellent results when the University of California at Los Angeles scoring system was used. However, only 38% of the patients had excellent results when the modified-Rowe scale was used. Overall, good or excellent results were observed in 89% to 95% of the patients using these four scoring systems. The University of California at Los Angeles score correlated poorly with the other systems. Interrater reliability between the four systems was poor. Generalized results of an investigation can be biased based on the selection of a scoring system. The lack of a widely accepted scoring system for the shoulder limits comparison of management for shoulder conditions. Thus, a widely accepted shoulder scoring system is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sixty-two patients who underwent arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the middle-third patellar tendon autograft without extraarticular augmentation were retrospectively reviewed at a minimum 2-year (mean, 37-month) followup. A postoperative KT-1000 arthrometric evaluation revealed a mean maximum manual difference of 0.3 mm (range, -6 to +16). Ninety percent of the patients had a mean maximum difference of < or = 3 mm. Three patients had a > or = 5 mm mean maximum difference; positive pivot shifts were noted in two of these patients. Despite an early range of motion, early weightbearing protocol without an extraarticular backup, the pivot shift (92% negative) was reliably eliminated at postoperative followup. Arthrometric parameters were statistically reduced (P < 0.0001) from preoperative status and were consistent with the diagnostic criteria established for normal knees. There was no relationship established in the 'tighter' knees (those with negative side-to-side arthrometric differences) and the incidence of knee flexion contractures, patellar pain symptoms, Cybex extension deficit (>20%), functional indices, or postoperative rating scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate clinically, functionally, and objectively our initial experience using free, autogenous middle third patellar tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction without extraarticular augmentation in 62 of 75 patients (80% followup) who were available for clinical review at a minimum 2-year followup. Subjective, clinical, functional, Cybex dynamometer, and KT-1000 arthrometer tests were performed along with modified tests of the Hospital for Special Surgery, Noyes Cincinnati, Tegner, and Lysholm knee rating scales. Ninety-two percent had a negative pivot shift at followup. The mean Cybex dynamometer extension deficits postoperatively were 9% and 7% at 180 and 240 deg/sec. Mild patellar pain symptoms were noted in 18%. The reoperation rate was 10% with a mild flexion contracture as the most common reason. The Hospital for Special Surgery scoring scale postoperatively was 88; Noyes, 86; Lysholm, 88; and Tegner, 6. Mean postoperative single-legged and vertical jump indices were 88% and 87%, respectively. The KT-1000 arthrometric evaluation postoperatively revealed a mean maximum manual difference of 0.3 mm; 92% of the patients had a maximum manual difference of < or = 3 mm. Subjectively,95% indicated that they would undergo the procedure again. Early results demonstrate excellent stability, preservation of motion, and encouraging evaluations by scoring scales and arthrometric evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The percent force changes in the posterior cruciate ligament were calculated using a previously validated computerized knee model after the femoral insertion sites were varied 2.5 and 5.0 mm in an anterior, posterior distal, anterior distal, and posterior distal direction. The tibial insertion sites were also varied 2.5 amd 5.0 mm in the medial, lateral, proximal, and distal directions. Percent force changes were measured over a range of 0 degrees to 90 degrees. These insertion sites simulated potential surgical placement errors. Results of this study demonstrated that the greatest percent force changes in the posterior cruciate ligament were at full extension. The greatest absolute percent force change between 0 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion was with a femoral insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament placed 5 mm anterior to its normal attachment site, which resulted in a 39% change in the posterior cruciate ligament force. Distal femoral site attachment had the least effect (10% at 5.0 mm). Alterations at the tibial attachment site were less sensitive than on the femur; the greatest absolute percent force changes occurred with medial and lateral attachment sites (14% and 15%, respectively, at 5.0 mm). A minimal amount of percent force changes were seen between 45 degrees and 75 degrees of knee flexion in all positions tested for both tibial and femoral attachment sites. This model suggests that, like the anterior cruciate ligament, the force in the posterior cruciate ligament is also sensitive to attachment site position. As in anterior cruciate ligament studies, the femoral attachment site was found to be more sensitive. The greatest percent force changes for the posterior cruciate ligament were seen at the extremes of the knee motion tested (i.e., 0 degreees and 90 degrees). The posterior cruciate ligament sensitivity to graft placement lends credence to the importance of anatomic reconstruction. Results of this study can also be extrapolated to help in designing early continuous passive motion and rehabilitation programs, with the safest range of knee motion between 45 degrees and 75 degrees. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) should be considered in young, active patients who have generalized or anterior knee pain. A careful physical exam includes a Wilson test, thigh girth measurements, diagnostic tunnel view radiographs, and other imaging studies as needed for grading and prognosis. Two case reports demonstrate the signs and symptoms of OCD. Treatment by primary care physicians with sports medicine training may be conservative if lesions are medial and in situ and if patients are not skeletally mature; otherwise, referral is advised. Prompt surgical treatment is generally successful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary care physicians are being called on more frequently to treat patients who have musculoskeletal injuries. This article discusses mechanisms of injury, diagnosis, and treatment, with emphasis on determining when to refer patients to an orthopedist. Discussed here are several types of knee injuries that require referral, including extensor mechanism injuries, most subluxations and dislocations, ligament injuries, and meniscus injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using an anterior portal for a labral elevator and shaver instrument, with the arthroscope in the anterosuperior portal, allows the posterior and posteroinferior chondrolabral junction to be safely prepared. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been documented to have inferior outcomes compared with primary ACL reconstruction. The reasons why remain unknown., Purpose: To determine whether surgical factors performed at the time of revision ACL reconstruction can influence a patient's outcome at 6-year follow-up., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2., Methods: Patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction were identified and prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Data collected included baseline patient characteristics, surgical technique and pathology, and a series of validated patient-reported outcome instruments: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Marx activity rating score. Patients were followed up for 6 years and asked to complete the identical set of outcome instruments. Regression analysis was used to control for baseline patient characteristics and surgical variables to assess the surgical risk factors for clinical outcomes 6 years after surgery., Results: A total of 1234 patients were enrolled (716 men, 58%; median age, 26 years), and 6-year follow-up was obtained on 79% of patients (980/1234). Using an interference screw for femoral fixation compared with a cross-pin resulted in significantly better outcomes in 6-year IKDC scores (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.9; P = .008) and KOOS sports/recreation and quality of life subscale scores (OR range, 2.2-2.7; 95% CI, 1.2-4.8; P < .01). Use of an interference screw compared with a cross-pin resulted in a 2.6 times less likely chance of having a subsequent surgery within 6 years. Use of an interference screw for tibial fixation compared with any combination of tibial fixation techniques resulted in significantly improved scores for IKDC (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9; P = .001); KOOS pain, activities of daily living, and sports/recreation subscales (OR range, 1.5-1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.4; P < .05); and WOMAC pain and activities of daily living subscales (OR range, 1.5-1.8; 95% CI, 1.0-2.7; P < .05). Use of a transtibial surgical approach compared with an anteromedial portal approach resulted in significantly improved KOOS pain and quality of life subscale scores at 6 years (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.02-2.2; P ≤ .04)., Conclusion: There are surgical variables at the time of ACL revision that can modify clinical outcomes at 6 years. Opting for a transtibial surgical approach and choosing an interference screw for femoral and tibial fixation improved patients' odds of having a significantly better 6-year clinical outcome in this cohort., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: This project was funded by grant No. 5R01-AR060846 from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. All author disclosures are listed in the Appendix (available in the online version of this article). AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Background: Long-term follow-up for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is limited due to heterogeneity in the number of techniques utilized, the number of surgeons included, and attrition bias., Purpose: To analyze a single surgeon's 35-year experience with ACLR using the transtibial technique, with an emphasis on temporal trends in graft selection and subanalyses on rates of revision surgery, contralateral ACLR, and nonrevision reoperation among different demographic cohorts of patients., Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4., Methods: All patients who underwent arthroscopically assisted single-bundle ACLR between 1986 and 2021 were identified from a prospectively maintained single-surgeon registry. Outcomes of interest included revision, reoperation, and contralateral rupture rates., Results: A total of 2915 ACLRs were performed during the senior surgeon's career. The mean age for primary ACLR was 29.4 ± 14.8 years. During primary ACLR, 98.4% of patients received a central-third bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft. Increasing patient age was associated with increasing allograft usage ( P < .01), with a significant temporal increase in allograft usage over the senior surgeon's career ( P < .01). There was a higher revision rate among younger patients ( P < .01), female patients aged 21 to 25 years ( P = .01), and patients who received an allograft during the primary procedure ( P = .04). The contralateral rupture rate showed no difference between sexes ( P = .34); however, patients who underwent ACLR with autograft had a greater rate of contralateral injury compared with those with allograft ( P < .01). The contralateral rupture rate was greater than the revision rate ( P < .01). The most common causes of nonrevision reoperation were failed meniscal repair, new meniscal tears, arthrofibrosis, and painful hardware removal., Conclusion: The findings of this single-surgeon registry reveal temporal trends in ACLR over a 35-year career. There was a trend toward increasing BPTB allograft use in ACLR, especially in older patients and revision cases. A greater revision rate was observed among younger patients, female patients, and those receiving allografts during primary surgery. Contralateral ACLR was more common than revision surgery., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: A.J.R. has received education payments from Medwest Associates, Arthrex, and Crossroads Orthopedics LLC; consulting fees from Vericel; and hospitality payments from Wright Medical Tech and Stryker. J.C. has received education payments from Medwest Associates, Arthrex, and Smith+Nephew; consulting fees from RTI Surgical, Smith+Nephew, Vericel, Arthrex, and DePuy Synthes Products; nonconsulting fees from Smith+Nephew and Arthrex; compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a nonaccredited and noncertified continuing education program from Linvatec; a grant from Arthrex; and hospitality payments from Medical Device Business Services, Medwest Associates, and Stryker. B.R.B. has received consulting fees from OsteoCentric Tech; hospitality payments from OsteoCentric Tech; and honoraria from NovoPedics. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Background: Meniscal and chondral damage is common in the patient undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction., Purpose: To determine if meniscal and/or articular cartilage pathology at the time of revision ACL surgery significantly influences a patient's outcome at 6-year follow-up., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction were prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Data collection included baseline demographics, surgical technique, pathology, treatment, and scores from 4 validated patient-reported outcome instruments: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Marx Activity Rating Scale. Patients were followed up at 6 years and asked to complete the identical set of outcome instruments. Regression analysis assessed the meniscal and articular cartilage pathology risk factors for clinical outcomes 6 years after revision ACL reconstruction., Results: An overall 1234 patients were enrolled (716 males, 58%; median age, 26 years). Surgeons reported the pathology at the time of revision surgery in the medial meniscus (45%), lateral meniscus (36%), medial femoral condyle (43%), lateral femoral condyle (29%), medial tibial plateau (11%), lateral tibial plateau (17%), patella (30%), and trochlea (21%). Six-year follow-up was obtained on 79% of the sample (980/1234). Meniscal pathology and articular cartilage pathology (medial femoral condyle, lateral femoral condyle, lateral tibial plateau, trochlea, and patella) were significant drivers of poorer patient-reported outcomes at 6 years (IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC, and Marx). The most consistent factors driving outcomes were having a medial meniscal excision (either before or at the time of revision surgery) and patellofemoral articular cartilage pathology. Six-year Marx activity levels were negatively affected by having either a repair/excision of the medial meniscus (odds ratio range, 1.45-1.72; P ≤ .04) or grade 3-4 patellar chondrosis (odds ratio, 1.72; P = .04). Meniscal pathology occurring before the index revision surgery negatively affected scores on all KOOS subscales except for sports/recreation ( P < .05). Articular cartilage pathology significantly impaired all KOOS subscale scores ( P < .05). Lower baseline outcome scores, higher body mass index, being a smoker, and incurring subsequent surgery all significantly increased the odds of reporting poorer clinical outcomes at 6 years., Conclusion: Meniscal and chondral pathology at the time of revision ACL reconstruction has continued significant detrimental effects on patient-reported outcomes at 6 years after revision surgery.

Purpose: To determine whether subgroups of patients exist based on the rate-of-recovery pattern of International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to determine clinical predictors for these subgroups., Methods: Patients who underwent primary or revision ACLR at a single institution from January 2014 to January 2019 were identified. Latent class growth analyses and growth mixture models (GMMs) with 1 to 6 classes were used to identify subgroups of patients based on functional rate-of-recovery patterns by use of preoperative, 1-year postoperative, and 2-year postoperative IKDC scores., Results: A total of 245 patients who underwent ACLR were included in the analysis. A 3-class GMM was chosen as the final model after 6 different models were run. Class 1, showing improvement from preoperatively to 1-year follow-up, with sustained improvement from 1 to 2 years postoperatively, constituted 77.1% of the study population (n = 189), whereas class 2, showing functional improvement between 1- and 2-year follow-up, was the smallest class, constituting 10.2% of the study population (n = 25), and class 3, showing slight improvement at 1-year follow-up, with a subsequent decline in IKDC scores between 1- and 2-year follow-up, constituted 12.7% of the study population (n = 31). Revision surgery (P = .005), a psychiatric history (P = .025), preoperative chronic knee pain (P = .024), and a subsequent knee injury within the follow-up period (P = .011) were the predictors of class 2 and class 3 rate-of-recovery patterns. Patient demographic characteristics, graft type, and concomitant ligament, meniscus, or cartilage injury at the time of surgery were not associated with the different recovery patterns described in this study., Conclusions: Patients may follow different rate-of-recovery patterns after ACLR. By use of the GMMs, 3 different rate-of-recovery patterns based on IKDC scores were identified. Although most patients follow a more ideal rate-of-recovery pattern, fewer patients may follow less favorable patterns. Revision surgery, a history of psychiatric illness, preoperative chronic knee pain, and a subsequent knee injury within the follow-up period were predictive of less favorable rate-of-recovery patterns., Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study., (Copyright © 2022 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lytic or malpositioned tunnels may require bone grafting during revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (rACLR) surgery. Patient characteristics and effects of grafting on outcomes after rACLR are not well described., Purpose: To describe preoperative characteristics, intraoperative findings, and 2-year outcomes for patients with rACLR undergoing bone grafting procedures compared with patients with rACLR without grafting., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: A total of 1234 patients who underwent rACLR were prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Baseline revision and 2-year characteristics, surgical technique, pathology, treatment, and patient-reported outcome instruments (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Marx Activity Rating Scale [Marx]) were collected, as well as subsequent surgery information, if applicable. The chi-square and analysis of variance tests were used to compare group characteristics., Results: A total of 159 patients (13%) underwent tunnel grafting-64 (5%) patients underwent 1-stage and 95 (8%) underwent 2-stage grafting. Grafting was isolated to the femur in 31 (2.5%) patients, the tibia in 40 (3%) patients, and combined in 88 patients (7%). Baseline KOOS Quality of Life (QoL) and Marx activity scores were significantly lower in the 2-stage group compared with the no bone grafting group ( P ≤ .001). Patients who required 2-stage grafting had more previous ACLRs ( P < .001) and were less likely to have received a bone-patellar tendon-bone or a soft tissue autograft at primary ACLR procedure ( P ≤ .021) compared with the no bone grafting group. For current rACLR, patients undergoing either 1-stage or 2-stage bone grafting were more likely to receive a bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft ( P ≤ .008) and less likely to receive a soft tissue autograft ( P ≤ .003) compared with the no bone grafting group. At 2-year follow-up of 1052 (85%) patients, we found inferior outcomes in the 2-stage bone grafting group (IKDC score = 68; KOOS QoL score = 44; KOOS Sport/Recreation score = 65; and Marx activity score = 3) compared with the no bone grafting group (IKDC score = 77; KOOS QoL score = 63; KOOS Sport/Recreation score = 75; and Marx activity score = 7) ( P ≤ .01). The 1-stage bone graft group did not significantly differ compared with the no bone grafting group., Conclusion: Tunnel bone grafting was performed in 13% of our rACLR cohort, with 8% undergoing 2-stage surgery. Patients treated with 2-stage grafting had inferior baseline and 2-year patient-reported outcomes and activity levels compared with patients not undergoing bone grafting. Patients treated with 1-stage grafting had similar baseline and 2-year patient-reported outcomes and activity levels compared with patients not undergoing bone grafting.

Background: Patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision report lower outcome scores on validated knee questionnaires postoperatively compared to cohorts with primary ACL reconstruction. In a previously active population, it is unclear if patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are associated with a return to activity (RTA) or vary by sports participation level (higher level vs. recreational athletes)., Hypotheses: Individual RTA would be associated with improved outcomes (ie, decreased knee symptoms, pain, function) as measured using validated PROs. Recreational participants would report lower PROs compared with higher level athletes and be less likely to RTA., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2., Methods: There were 862 patients who underwent a revision ACL reconstruction (rACLR) and self-reported physical activity at any level preoperatively. Those who did not RTA reported no activity 2 years after revision. Baseline data included patient characteristics, surgical history and characteristics, and PROs: International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire, Marx Activity Rating Scale, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. A binary indicator was used to identify patients with same/better PROs versus worse outcomes compared with baseline, quantifying the magnitude of change in each direction, respectively. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate risk factors for not returning to activity, the association of 2-year PROs after rACLR surgery by RTA status, and whether each PRO and RTA status differed by participation level., Results: At 2 years postoperatively, approximately 15% did not RTA, with current smokers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.3; P = .001), female patients (aOR = 2.9; P < .001), recreational participants (aOR = 2.0; P = .016), and those with a previous medial meniscal excision (aOR = 1.9; P = .013) having higher odds of not returning. In multivariate models, not returning to activity was significantly associated with having worse PROs at 2 years; however, no clinically meaningful differences in PROs at 2 years were seen between participation levels., Conclusion: Recreational-level participants were twice as likely to not RTA compared with those participating at higher levels. Within a previously active cohort, no RTA was a significant predictor of lower PROs after rACLR. However, among patients who did RTA after rACLR, approximately 20% reported lower outcome scores. Most patients with rACLR who were active at baseline improved over time; however, patients who reported worse outcomes at 2 years had a clinically meaningful decline across all PROs.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic sports procedures. Two main techniques are used for accomplishing an ACL reconstruction: transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques. The transtibial technique has been criticized for its inability to create an anatomic femoral tunnel given the intrinsic constraint of the tibial tunnel during drilling. However, technical modifications of the transtibial technique can result in anatomic tunnel entrance positioning and a properly oriented graft. This Technical Note presents our technique for anatomic transtibial ACL reconstruction., (© 2021 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier.)

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an increasingly common procedure as orthopaedic patients seek to remain active longer in life, resulting in more ligamentous knee injuries. Graft selection is at the forefront of decision making in knee reconstruction, with advantages and disadvantages to various grafts, including allograft to autograft. Although the gold standard for the ACL reconstruction of elite athletes and highly active patients has traditionally been bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (BTB), this graft is not without its disadvantages, such as increased operative time, increased postoperative pain, potential for anterior knee pain, larger incision, violation of the extensor mechanism, and potentially kneeling pain. Soft tissue autografts (hamstring, quadriceps) offer a good alternative; however, they may be associated with higher rerupture rates, as well as associated donor site morbidity. Additionally, soft tissue allografts have a higher graft rupture rate. For this reason, it is the senior author's preference to perform allograft ACL reconstruction with BTB allograft in appropriately selected patients. We describe our technique for an efficient and reproducible BTB allograft preparation., (© 2021 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier.)

Background: Although graft choice may be limited in the revision setting based on previously used grafts, most surgeons believe that graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an important factor related to outcome., Hypothesis: In the ACL revision setting, there would be no difference between autograft and allograft in rerupture rate and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 6-year follow-up., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2., Methods: Patients who had revision surgery were identified and prospectively enrolled in this cohort study by 83 surgeons over 52 sites. Data collected included baseline characteristics, surgical technique and pathology, and a series of validated PRO measures. Patients were followed up at 6 years and asked to complete the identical set of PRO instruments. Incidence of additional surgery and reoperation because of graft failure were also recorded. Multivariable regression models were used to determine the predictors (risk factors) of PROs, graft rerupture, and reoperation at 6 years after revision surgery., Results: A total of 1234 patients including 716 (58%) men were enrolled. A total of 325 (26%) underwent revision using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft; 251 (20%), soft tissue autograft; 289 (23%), BTB allograft; 302 (25%), soft tissue allograft; and 67 (5%), other graft. Questionnaires and telephone follow-up for subsequent surgery information were obtained for 809 (66%) patients, while telephone follow-up was only obtained for an additional 128 patients for the total follow-up on 949 (77%) patients. Graft choice was a significant predictor of 6-year Marx Activity Rating Scale scores ( P = .024). Specifically, patients who received a BTB autograft for revision reconstruction had higher activity levels than did patients who received a BTB allograft (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% CI, 1.25-2.94). Graft rerupture was reported in 5.8% (55/949) of patients by their 6-year follow-up: 3.5% (16/455) of patients with autografts and 8.4% (37/441) of patients with allografts. Use of a BTB autograft for revision resulted in patients being 4.2 times less likely to sustain a subsequent graft rupture than if a BTB allograft were utilized ( P = .011; 95% CI, 1.56-11.27). No significant differences were found in graft rerupture rates between BTB autograft and soft tissue autografts ( P = .87) or between BTB autografts and soft tissue allografts ( P = .36). Use of an autograft was found to be a significant predictor of having fewer reoperations within 6 years compared with using an allograft ( P = .010; OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87)., Conclusion: BTB and soft tissue autografts had a decreased risk in graft rerupture compared with BTB allografts. BTB autografts were associated with higher activity level than were BTB allografts at 6 years after revision reconstruction. Surgeons and patients should consider this information when choosing a graft for revision ACL reconstruction.

Instability of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon is a recognized source of shoulder pain. However, this diagnosis is usually associated with concomitant pathology including subscapularis tendon tears. The appropriate diagnosis of biceps incarceration or instability remains challenging, with failure to address instability being likely to result in persistent pain and disability despite arthroscopic management of concomitant shoulder pathology. The objective of this article is to (1) describe a dynamic test performed both preoperatively and intraoperatively, termed the "biceps incarceration maneuver," to help identify biceps instability; (2) reinforce the concept that biceps instability must be ruled out in young patients presenting with anterior shoulder pain; and (3) report that with proper diagnosis and treatment, patients with biceps instability will experience rapid symptomatic resolution after management., (© 2021 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the Arthroscopy Association of North America.)

Background: Meniscal preservation has been demonstrated to contribute to long-term knee health. This has been a successful intervention in patients with isolated tears and tears associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the results of meniscal repair in the setting of revision ACL reconstruction have not been documented., Purpose: To examine the prevalence and 2-year operative success rate of meniscal repairs in the revision ACL setting., Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: All cases of revision ACL reconstruction with concomitant meniscal repair from a multicenter group between 2006 and 2011 were selected. Two-year follow-up was obtained by phone and email to determine whether any subsequent surgery had occurred to either knee since the initial revision ACL reconstruction. If so, operative reports were obtained, whenever possible, to verify the pathologic condition and subsequent treatment., Results: In total, 218 patients (18%) from 1205 revision ACL reconstructions underwent concurrent meniscal repairs. There were 235 repairs performed: 153 medial, 48 lateral, and 17 medial and lateral. The majority of these repairs (n = 178; 76%) were performed with all-inside techniques. Two-year surgical follow-up was obtained on 90% (197/218) of the cohort. Overall, the meniscal repair failure rate was 8.6% (17/197) at 2 years. Of the 17 failures, 15 were medial (13 all-inside, 2 inside-out) and 2 were lateral (both all-inside). Four medial failures were treated in conjunction with a subsequent repeat revision ACL reconstruction., Conclusion: Meniscal repair in the revision ACL reconstruction setting does not have a high failure rate at 2-year follow-up. Failure rates for medial and lateral repairs were both <10% and consistent with success rates of primary ACL reconstruction meniscal repair. Medial tears underwent reoperation for failure at a significantly higher rate than lateral tears.

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the transferability of skills acquired on a low-cost, at-home, nonanatomic triangulation simulation system to cadaveric models., Methods: We randomized 28 medical students into either a simulator-training group (n = 14) or group with no training (control, n = 14). All subjects were pretested using a standardized checklist of arthroscopic skills on cadaveric knees and shoulders. Training-group subjects practiced on the triangulation simulator for 90 minutes per week for 4 consecutive weeks. Control subjects received no training. All subjects completed a post-test checklist of arthroscopic skills on cadaveric knees and shoulders, as well as 4 training tasks on the simulator. A blinded orthopaedic surgeon evaluated the arthroscopic videos using the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET) score., Results: Training-group knee and shoulder ASSET scores increased from 12.2 ± 1.85 to 14.6 ± 2.76 ( P  = .02) and from 14.6 ± 3.5 to 17.9 ± 4.5 ( P  = .29), respectively. In the control group, knee and shoulder ASSET scores increased from 14.3 ± 3.12 to 14.25 ± 4.67 ( P  = .99) and from 14.2 ± 2.7 to 17.07 ± 6.7 ( P  = .58), respectively. There were no significant differences in the mean post-test ASSET scores between the training group and control group for either knee or shoulder arthroscopy. The post-test ASSET safety subscore during knee arthroscopy was significantly higher in the training group ( P  = .03). The training group was able to complete significantly more simulator tasks compared with controls ( P  = .003) at post-testing. A significant positive correlation was found between knee arthroscopy performance and the number of tasks completed during simulation post-testing ( P  = .043). There was no significant correlation between shoulder arthroscopy performance and simulation performance ( P  = .532)., Conclusions: Basic triangulation skills may be acquired by training on a low-cost, at-home, nonanatomic triangulation simulation system, although the degree of transferability and universal joint applicability, as well as the existence of an early ceiling effect in skill development, could not be shown., Level of Evidence: Level II, randomized controlled trial., (© 2019 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Microfracture is a commonly utilized cartilage restoration technique for articular cartilage defects. While the removal of the calcified cartilage layer (CCL) has been shown to be critical with in vivo models, little is known with regard to surgeon reliability to adequately perform the technique., Purpose: To evaluate surgeon reliability in removing the CCL utilizing open and arthroscopic techniques., Study Design: Controlled laboratory study., Methods: Eleven cadaveric knees were utilized to create four 12-mm diameter defects in the anterior and posterior medial femoral condyles. Eleven fellowship-trained surgeons were asked to perform the following procedures: remove the CCL open, retain the CCL open, remove the CCL arthroscopically, and retain the CCL arthroscopically. Samples underwent histologic staining and analysis with 3-dimensional micro-computed tomography. The latter was used to calculate the percentage of the CCL that was removed or retained across the entire defect., Results: When surgeons were asked to retain the CCL arthroscopically, 48% ± 41% (mean ± SD) remained. When surgeons were asked to remove the CCL arthroscopically, 24% ± 35% remained. There was no statistical difference between these groups ( P > .05). When the CCL was retained during open preparation, 60% ± 39% remained. During attempts to remove the CCL in an open manner, 19% ± 28% remained. There was a significant difference in the amount of CCL remaining between the open removal and open retaining groups ( P = .03). There were no significant differences in the percentage of CCL remaining between the open and arthroscopic preservation groups and between the open and arthroscopic removal groups., Conclusion/clinical Relevance: This study highlights the significant variability in surgeon ability to reliably retain or remove the CCL. However, there appears to be improved ability of surgeons to more reliably remove or retain the CCL in an open fashion as compared with the arthroscopic approach.