1. Do Motor–Cognitive and Motor–Motor Dual-Task Training Differently Affect Dual-Task Interference in Individuals With Intellectual Disability?
- Author
-
Borji, Rihab, Baccouch, Rym, Laatar, Rabeb, Falhi, Sirine, Sahli, Sonia, and Rebai, Haithem
- Subjects
- *
MOTOR ability , *REPEATED measures design , *HUMAN multitasking , *TASK performance , *MILD cognitive impairment , *DATA analysis , *EDUCATIONAL outcomes , *STATISTICAL sampling , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *MULTIVARIATE analysis , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *PSYCHOLOGY of movement , *INTELLECTUAL disabilities , *CONTROL groups , *PRE-tests & post-tests , *STATISTICAL reliability , *ONE-way analysis of variance , *STATISTICS , *ANALYSIS of variance , *DATA analysis software , *COGNITION , *PEOPLE with disabilities , *POSTURAL balance , *PHYSICAL mobility - Abstract
This study explored the effect of different dual-task (DT) training programs on DT interference in adults with intellectual disability. Center-of-pressure (CoP) mean velocity in single-task (ST) and cognitive-DT conditions and the Timed Up-and-Go Test (TUGT) during ST, cognitive-DT, and motor-DT conditions were assessed before and after intervention in a cognitive–motor training group, a motor–motor training group, and a control group. Before training, CoP mean velocity and TUGT time increased (p <.001) in DT compared with the ST condition. After training, the CoP mean velocity values remained unchanged (p =.07) in DT compared with the ST condition among the cognitive–motor training group. Furthermore, compared with the ST condition, no increase (p = 1) was reported in the TUGT time during the cognitive-DT condition for the cognitive–motor training group and during the motor-DT for the motor–motor training group (p =.12). The effect of DT training on DT interference depends on the training modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF