Search

Background: Peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has recently emerged as a prognostic biomarker in many disease states. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of NLR to predict poor functional outcomes in patients with hemorrhagic stroke and to compare it with the intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) score. Materials and methods: Patients who presented to the emergency department with clinical features suggestive of stroke were evaluated with computed tomography (CT) brain to identify ICH. The ICH scores and NLR were estimated at the time of admission. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score equal to or greater than 3 at 90 days was used to define poor functional outcomes (major disability or death). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted with NLR and the ICH score to analyze and compare their discriminative ability to predict poor functional outcomes. Results: A total of 158 patients were recruited for the study. One hundred and seven patients were found to have poor functional outcomes as per their mRS score at 90 days. The mean NLR and the ICH scores at presentation were significantly higher for the poor outcome group (6.57 and 2.83) compared to the good outcome group (2.75 and 1.49). The ROC analysis revealed that both NLR and the ICH scores were good predictors of functional outcomes at 90 days with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.814 and 0.819, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of NLR were 84 and 66.3% and those of the ICH score were 66.7 and 78.3% to predict poor functional outcomes. Conclusion: In patients with hemorrhagic stroke, NLR at admission is a good predictor of functional outcomes at 90 days. When compared to the ICH score, NLR is more sensitive but less specific in predicting poor functional outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute liver failure (ALF) is not an uncommon complication of a common disease such as acute hepatitis. Viral hepatitis followed by antituberculosis drug–induced hepatotoxicity are the commonest causes of ALF in India. Clinically, such patients present with appearance of jaundice, encephalopathy, and coagulopathy. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and cerebral edema are central and most important clinical event in the course of ALF, followed by superadded infections, and determine the outcome in these patients. The pathogenesis of encephalopathy and cerebral edema in ALF is unique and multifactorial. Ammonia plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis, and several therapies aim to correct this abnormality. The role of newer ammonia-lowering agents is still evolving. These patients are best managed at a tertiary care hospital with facility for liver transplantation (LT). Aggressive intensive medical management has been documented to salvage a substantial proportion of patients. In those with poor prognostic factors, LT is the only effective therapy that has been shown to improve survival. However, recognizing suitable patients with poor prognosis has remained a challenge. Close monitoring, early identification and treatment of complications, and couseling for transplant form the first-line approach to manage such patients. Recent research shows that use of dynamic prognostic models is better for selecting patients undergoing liver transplantation and timely transplant can save life of patients with ALF with poor prognostic factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute liver failure (ALF) is an infrequent, unpredictable, potentially fatal complication of acute liver injury (ALI) consequent to varied etiologies. Etiologies of ALF as reported in the literature have regional differences, which affects the clinical presentation and natural course. In this part of the consensus article designed to reflect the clinical practices in India, disease burden, epidemiology, clinical presentation, monitoring, and prognostication have been discussed. In India, viral hepatitis is the most frequent cause of ALF, with drug-induced hepatitis due to antituberculosis drugs being the second most frequent cause. The clinical presentation of ALF is characterized by jaundice, coagulopathy, and encephalopathy. It is important to differentiate ALF from other causes of liver failure, including acute on chronic liver failure, subacute liver failure, as well as certain tropical infections which can mimic this presentation. The disease often has a fulminant clinical course with high short-term mortality. Death is usually attributable to cerebral complications, infections, and resultant multiorgan failure. Timely liver transplantation (LT) can change the outcome, and hence, it is vital to provide intensive care to patients until LT can be arranged. It is equally important to assess prognosis to select patients who are suitable for LT. Several prognostic scores have been proposed, and their comparisons show that indigenously developed dynamic scores have an edge over scores described from the Western world. Management of ALF will be described in part 2 of this document. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstay of treatment for acid peptic diseases (APDs), but are often irrationally prescribed in clinical practice. Appropriate prescription of PPIs is needed to optimize outcomes, and minimize risks and cost burden on the healthcare system., Objective: To review available literature on efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and give recommendations for rational use of PPIs from an Indian perspective., Methods: Twelve healthcare professionals (9 gastroenterologists, 1 cardiologist, 1 orthopedist, 1 clinical pharmacologist) comprised the expert group; members disclosed conflicts of interest. The creation of the expert review was through a process that included meetings (in-person, online, telephone) where each professional contributed their experiences with regards to efficacy and safety of PPIs. Articles published between the years 2000 and 2017 were reviewed for evaluation of safety and efficacy of PPIs in treatment of various APDs., Conclusion: This expert review provides key recommendations for decision making in order to minimize the irrational use of PPIs. Some significant recommendations include: patients with GERD and acid-related complications should take a PPI for minimum 12 weeks for healing of esophagitis, and for maximum up to 48 weeks for symptom control. Patients with Barrett's esophagus should take long-term PPI. Patients at high risk for ulcer-related bleeding from NSAIDs including aspirin should take a PPI if they continue to take NSAIDs. Best practice recommendations are meant to merely assist with decision making in conjunction with patients' clinical history, and are not intended to dictate mandatory rules., (© Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 2011.)

Interferon treatment is the established option for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B without decompensated liver disease. However, such treatment is expensive. We report here our data of a multi-center, open-label trial of the use of an indigenously produced interferon in the treatment of chronic HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Adult patients with chronic HBeAg-positive hepatitis B with elevated serum transaminase activity and positive serum HBV DNA test were treated with 5 MU/day of an indigenously produced interferon (Shanferon; Shantha Biotechnics, Hyderabad, India) for 4 months, and were then followed up for 6 months. Of the 39 patients enrolled, 36 completed the treatment and 33 completed the post-treatment follow-up. Of the 33 patients who completed the study, end-of-treatment biochemical and virological responses were observed in 10 (30%) and 5 (15%) respectively. Sustained biochemical and virological responses were observed in 15 (45%) and 7 (21%), patients respectively. Adverse effects led to the discontinuation of treatment in only one patient. Our data suggest that safety and efficacy of the indigenously produced interferon were similar to those previously reported results with interferon from other sources.