Search

Introduction: Medications for addiction treatment (MAT) are the evidence-based standard of care for treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), but stigma continues to surround their use. We conducted an exploratory study to characterize perceptions of different types of MAT among people who use drugs.Methods: We conducted this qualitative study in adults with a history of non-medical opioid use who presented to an emergency department for complications of OUD. A semi-structured interview that explored knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes toward MAT was administered, and applied thematic analysis conducted.Results: We enrolled 20 adults. All participants had prior experience with MAT. Among participants indicating a preferred treatment modality, buprenorphine was the commonly favored agent. Previous experience with prolonged withdrawal symptoms upon MAT discontinuation and the perception of “trading one drug for another” were common reasons for reluctance to engage in agonist or partial-agonist therapy. While some participants preferred treatment with naltrexone, others were unwilling to initiate antagonist therapy due to fear of precipitated withdrawal. Most participants strongly considered the aversive nature of MAT discontinuation as a barrier to initiating treatment. Participants overall viewed MAT positively, but many had strong preferences for a particular agent.Conclusion: The anticipation of withdrawal symptoms during initiation and cessation of treatment affected willingness to engage in a specific therapy. Future educational materials for people who use drugs may focus on comparisons of respective benefits and drawbacks of agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists. Emergency clinicians must be prepared to answer questions about MAT discontinuation to effectively engage patients with OUD.

Introduction: Bystander naloxone distribution is an important component of public health initiatives to decrease opioid-related deaths. While there is evidence supporting naloxone distribution programs, the effects of increasing naloxone availability on the behavior of people who use drugs have not been adequately delineated. In this study we sought to 1) evaluate whether individuals’ drug use patterns have changed due to naloxone availability; and 2) explore individuals’ knowledge of, access to, experiences with, and perceptions of naloxone.Methods: We conducted a pilot study of adults presenting to the emergency department whose medical history included non-medical opioid use. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants and thematic analysis was used to code and analyze interview transcripts.Results: Ten participants completed the study. All were aware of naloxone by brand name (Narcan) and had been trained in its use, and all but one had either currently or previously possessed a kit. Barriers to naloxone administration included fear of legal repercussions, not having it available, and a desire to avoid interrupting another user’s “high.” Of the eight participants who reported being revived with naloxone at least once during their lifetime, all described experiencing a noxious physical response and expressed a desire to avoid receiving it again. Furthermore, participants did not report increasing their use of opioids when naloxone was available.Conclusions: Participants were accepting of and knowledgeable about naloxone, and were willing to administer naloxone to save a life. Participants tended to use opioids more cautiously when naloxone was present due to fears of experiencing precipitated withdrawal. This study provides preliminary evidence countering the unsubstantiated narrative that increased naloxone availability begets more high-risk opioid use and further supports increasing naloxone access.

Background: In 2020, there were 36.7 million reported falls among older adults (65+) in the United States. Ethanol and other sedating substances may increase fall risk among older adults due to their effect on cognitive and physical function. We estimate the prevalence of these substances in blood specimens of older adults presenting with a fall injury at selected trauma centers. Methods: The initial study collected blood specimens from May 2020 through July 2021 from adults undergoing a trauma team evaluation at selected United States Level 1 trauma centers. We limited our study to older adults evaluated after a fall (n = 1,365) and selected a random sample (n = 300) based on age, sex, and trauma-center quotas. Medical health records and blood specimens obtained at trauma center presentation were analyzed. We estimated the prevalence of ethanol, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, and opioids in the blood specimens. Two-sample tests of binomial proportions and Chi-square two-tailed tests were used to compare prevalence estimates of substances by demographic characteristics. Results: At least one substance was detected among 31.3% of samples analyzed. Prevalences of specific substances detected were 9.3% (95% CI: 6.0–12.6%) for benzodiazepines, 4.3% (95% CI: 2.0–6.7%) for cannabinoids, 8.0% (95% CI: 5.2–11.7%) for ethanol, and 15.0% (95% CI: 10.9–19.1%) for opioids. There were 18 deaths (6%; 95% CI: 3.6–9.3%). One-third of decedents had at least one substance detected in their blood. Discussion: Opioids were the most frequently detected substance, followed by benzodiazepines, ethanol, and cannabinoids. Substance use prevalence was not uniform across demographics, with differences observed by sex and age. Conclusions: This study provides insight into the frequency of the presence of substances that may contribute to fall risk and serious injury among older adults. Screening older adults for substances that impair cognitive and physical function can enhance clinical fall prevention efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-pharmaceutical fentanyl and its analogs have driven striking increases in opioid-associated overdose deaths. These highly potent opioids can be found at low concentrations in biological specimens. Little is known regarding the concentrations of these substances among survivors of non-fatal overdoses. In a locale where fentanyl is responsible for the majority of non-fatal opioid overdoses, we compared the concentration of fentanyl in blood to naloxone dosing in the presence and absence of a concurrent sedative-hypnotic exposure. In this pilot study, we enrolled adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) who: (1) arrived after an overdose requiring naloxone for the reversal of respiratory depression; and (2) who required venipuncture or intravenous access as part of their clinical care. Blood specimens (n = 20) underwent comprehensive toxicology testing, including the quantitation of fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, and naloxone, as well as the detection of common sedative-hypnotics and a wide range of other illicit and pharmaceutical substances. We then compared fentanyl concentrations to naloxone dosing in participants with and without a concomitant sedative-hypnotic exposure. Nineteen of twenty participants (95%) were exposed to fentanyl prior to their overdose; the remaining participant tested positive for heroin metabolites. No participants reported pharmaceutical fentanyl use. Fentanyl analogs – acetylfentanyl or carfentanil – were present in three specimens. In 11 cases, fentanyl and its metabolites were the only opioids identified. Among the fentanyl-exposed, blood concentrations ranged from <0.1–19 ng/mL with a mean of 6.2 ng/mL and a median of 3.6 ng/mL. There was no relationship between fentanyl concentration and naloxone dose administered for reversal. We detected sedative-hypnotics (including benzodiazepines, muscle relaxants, and antidepressants) in nine participants. Among the sedative-hypnotic exposed, fentanyl concentrations were lower, but naloxone dosing was similar to those without a concomitant exposure. In this study, we found that: 1) fentanyl was present in the blood of nearly all participants; 2) fentanyl concentrations were lower among study participants with concomitant sedative-hypnotic exposure; and 3) the dose of naloxone administered for overdose reversal was not associated with the measured fentanyl concentration in blood specimens. Our results underscore the role that tolerance and concomitant drug exposure play in the precipitation and resuscitation of management of opioid overdose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]