Search

Background: Head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) has a poor prognosis, with approximately 25–30% of patients transitioning into the palliative phase at some point. The length of this phase is relatively short, with a median duration of five months. Patients in this stage often have increased prognostic information needs. Unfortunately, predicting individual life expectancy in this phase is particularly challenging, as physicians and patients tend to overestimate survival. To address this issue, we developed the prognostic model OncologIQ Palliative based on user preferences. In this study, we now aim to assess the clinical impact of utilizing this model during counselling. Methods: This study will employ both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The primary outcome is decisional conflict and satisfaction with the decision-making process after counselling without (cohort 1) and with (cohort 2) OncologIQ Palliative. Therefore, a prospective sequential cohort study will be conducted. Secondary outcomes include the amount of palliative treatment, overall survival rates, and quality of life. These measurements will be collected after the intervention. Additionally, patients' perspectives on the decision-making process and proactive care planning, including end-of-life discussions, will be explored through interviews. Discussion: By offering more personalized prognostic information for HNSCC patients in the palliative phase, we anticipate a shift towards more patient-centred counselling. This approach can facilitate enhanced end-of-life discussions and better proactive care planning. Patients may experience reduced decisional conflict, feel better prepared for what's coming, and find assistance in their decision-making process. This could potentially lead to fewer palliative treatments. Overall, these aspects can contribute to a better quality of life and quality of care for HNSCC patients in the last phase of their lives. Trial Registration: This study was registered November 18, 2024, on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06699316. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oncokompas is a web-based self-management application that supports cancer survivors to monitor their health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and symptoms, and to obtain personalised feedback and tailored options for supportive care. In a large randomised controlled trial among survivors of head and neck cancer, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer and (non-)Hodgkin lymphoma, Oncokompas proved to improve HRQOL, and to reduce several tumour-specific symptoms. Effect sizes were however small, and no effect was observed on the primary outcome patient activation. Therefore, this study aims to explore which subgroups of cancer survivors may especially benefit from Oncokompas. Cancer survivors (n = 625) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (access to Oncokompas, n = 320) or control group (6 months waiting list, n = 305). Outcome measures were HRQOL, tumour-specific symptoms, and patient activation. Potential moderators included socio-demographic (sex, age, marital status, education, employment), clinical (tumour type, stage, time since diagnosis, treatment modality, comorbidities), and personal factors (self-efficacy, personal control, health literacy, Internet use), and patient activation, mental adjustment to cancer, HRQOL, symptoms, and need for supportive care, measured at baseline. Linear mixed models were performed to investigate potential moderators. The intervention effect on HRQOL was the largest among cancer survivors with low to moderate self-efficacy, and among those with high personal control and those with high health literacy scores. Cancer survivors with higher baseline symptom scores benefitted more on head and neck (pain in the mouth, social eating, swallowing, coughing, trismus), and colorectal cancer (weight) specific symptoms. Oncokompas seems most effective in reducing symptoms in head and neck cancer and colorectal cancer survivors who report a higher burden of tumour-specific symptoms. Oncokompas seems most effective in improving HRQOL in cancer survivors with lower self-efficacy, and in cancer survivors with higher personal control, and higher health literacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Objective measurements of levels of physical activity and fitness in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are lacking. Furthermore, demographic, clinical and lifestyle-related correlates of low levels of physical activity and fitness in patients with HNC are unknown. This study aims to investigate the levels of accelerometer that assessed physical activity and fitness in patients with HNC and to identify their demographical, clinical and lifestyle-related correlates. Methods: Two hundred and fifty-four patients who were recently diagnosed with HNC and participated in the NETherlands QUality of life and Biomedical cohort studies In head and neck Cancer (NET-QUBIC) study were included. Physical activity (accelerometer), cardiorespiratory fitness (Chester Step Test), hand grip strength (hand dynamometer) and lower body muscle function (30-second chair-stand test) were assessed. Multivariable linear regression analyses with a stepwise forward selection procedure were used. Results: Patients spent 229 min/d in physical activity of which 18 min/d in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. The mean predicted VO2max was 27.9 ml/kg/min, the mean hand grip strength was 38.1 kg and the mean number of standings was 14.3. Patients with lower educational level, more comorbidity and higher tumor stage spent significantly less time in physical activity. Older patients, females and patients with a higher tumor stage had significantly lower cardiorespiratory fitness levels. Older patients, females, patients with more comorbidity, patients with normal weight and patients who have never smoked had significantly lower hand grip strength. Older patients, patients with lower educational level, smokers and patients with more comorbidity had a significantly lower function of lower body muscle. Conclusions: Pre-treatment levels of physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and lower body muscle function are low in patients with HNC. Based on this study, exercise programs targeted and tailored to patients with low levels of physical activity and fitness can be developed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Evaluation of outcome after curative treatment for sinonasal mucosal melanoma focused on the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on recurrence and survival. Design: Retrospective chart analysis. Setting: Tertiary referral hospital. Participants: Fifty‐one patients with primary sinonasal mucosal melanoma who underwent surgical resection with curative intention between 1980 and 2016 at Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam. Main outcome measures: Patients were categorised into 2 groups: surgery alone and surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy. Log‐rank test was used to compare rates of recurrence and survival between treatment groups. Predictors for treatment modality, recurrence and survival were assessed with multivariate statistical analysis. Results: Of all patients, 23.5% developed local recurrence and 47.1% developed distant metastasis. Estimated 5‐year disease‐free survival was 25.2%, and 5‐year overall survival (OS) was 38.1%. Forty‐three patients (84.3%) were treated with post‐operative radiotherapy. Patients who underwent surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy presented more often with high tumour stage, tumour involving multiple sites and positive margins. Post‐operative radiotherapy seemed to be associated with better local control (P = .549). No effect was found on occurrence of distant metastasis and OS. Positive margin status was an independent negative predictor for distant metastasis‐free survival and overall survival. Conclusions: Our treatment outcomes are consistent with literature. Post‐operative radiotherapy seems to be associated with improved local control despite advanced disease and positive margin status in this treatment group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]