Search

EUSOBI and 30 national breast radiology bodies support mammography for population-based screening, demonstrated to reduce breast cancer (BC) mortality and treatment impact. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the reduction in mortality is 40 % for women aged 50-69 years taking up the invitation while the probability of false-positive needle biopsy is <1 % per round and overdiagnosis is only 1-10 % for a 20-year screening. Mortality reduction was also observed for the age groups 40-49 years and 70-74 years, although with "limited evidence". Thus, we firstly recommend biennial screening mammography for average-risk women aged 50-69 years; extension up to 73 or 75 years, biennially, is a second priority, from 40-45 to 49 years, annually, a third priority. Screening with thermography or other optical tools as alternatives to mammography is discouraged. Preference should be given to population screening programmes on a territorial basis, with double reading. Adoption of digital mammography (not film-screen or phosphor-plate computer radiography) is a priority, which also improves sensitivity in dense breasts. Radiologists qualified as screening readers should be involved in programmes. Digital breast tomosynthesis is also set to become "routine mammography" in the screening setting in the next future. Dedicated pathways for high-risk women offering breast MRI according to national or international guidelines and recommendations are encouraged., Key Points: • EUSOBI and 30 national breast radiology bodies support screening mammography. • A first priority is double-reading biennial mammography for women aged 50-69 years. • Extension to 73-75 and from 40-45 to 49 years is also encouraged. • Digital mammography (not film-screen or computer radiography) should be used. • DBT is set to become "routine mammography" in the screening setting in the next future.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-FDG PET, CT, and combined PET/CT in the detection of splenic involvement at initial staging of lymphoma., Materials and Methods: A retrospective longitudinal analysis was performed on the records of 111 patients with proven lymphoma who had undergone PET and CT before and after treatment. CT scans were evaluated independently by two radiologists, and PET scans by two nuclear medicine physicians. Abnormal CT findings were defined as low-attenuation nodules or a splenic index greater than 725 cm(3) (> 2 SDs above the mean in 100 controls). An abnormal PET finding was defined as splenic uptake greater than hepatic uptake. True splenic involvement was defined retrospectively on the basis of the treatment response assessed with criteria revised in the International Harmonization Project on lymphoma. Observer agreement and sensitivity and specificity values were calculated., Results: Observer agreement for CT splenic index and PET findings was good. For initial splenic staging, the sensitivity and specificity of CT, PET, and PET/CT were 91% and 96%, 75% and 99%, and 100% and 95%., Conclusion: For initial staging of splenic involvement in malignant lymphoma, the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT can reach 100% and 95%. The sensitivity of the combined approach is higher than that of either technique alone.

Background: Hemato-oncology patients treated with intensive chemotherapy usually require the placement of a central venous catheter (CVC). CVCs are frequently complicated by catheter-related central venous thrombosis (CVT), which has been associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolism and catheter-related infection., Objectives: To determine the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis with s.c. low-molecular-weight heparin (nadroparin) administered once daily in a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in patients with hematologic malignancies., Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies requiring intensive chemotherapy including autologous stem cell transplantation were eligible. The patients were randomized to receive nadroparin 2850 antifactor Xa units once daily or placebo s.c. for 3 weeks. Venography was performed on day 21 after CVC insertion. Secondary outcomes were bleeding and catheter-related infection., Results: In total, 113 patients were randomized to nadroparin or placebo, and 87 patients (77%) underwent venography. In total, 11 venographically proven catheter-related CVTs were diagnosed. The frequency of catheter-related CVT was not significantly different between study groups, namely four catheter-related CVTs in the placebo group [9%; 95% CI: 0.002-0.16] vs. seven catheter-related CVTs in the nadroparin group (17%; 95% CI: 0.06-0.28). In addition, no difference in the incidence of catheter-related infection or bleeding was observed between the groups., Conclusion: This study showed that the actual risk for catheter-related CVT in patients with hematologic malignancies is lower than suggested in earlier studies in cancer patients. Although prophylactic administration of nadroparin appeared to be safe in this group of patients with a high risk of bleeding, it cannot be recommended for the prevention of catheter-related CVT or catheter-related infection in patients with hematologic malignancies.

A 70-year-old man had abdominal distension and pain without fever for two weeks, caused by a sigmoid perforation due to a chicken bone.

Purpose: To validate abdominal ultrasonography and helical computed tomography in detecting causes for sepsis in patients after abdominal surgery and to determine improved criteria for its use., Materials and Methods: Eighty-five consecutive surgical patients primarily operated for non-infectious disease were included in this prospective study. Forty-one patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. All patients were suspected of an intra-abdominal sepsis after abdominal surgery. Both ultrasonography (US) and helical abdominal computed tomography (CT) were performed to investigate the origin of an intra-abdominal sepsis. The images of both US and CT were interpreted on a four-point scale by different radiologists or residents in radiology, the investigators were blinded of each other's test. Interpretations of US and CT were compared with a reference standard which was defined by the result of diagnostic aspiration of suspected fluid collections, (re)laparotomy, clinical course or the opinion of an independent panel. Likelihood ratios and post-test probabilities were calculated and interobserver agreement was determined using kappa statistics., Results: The overall prevalence of an abdominal infection was 0.49. The likelihood ratio (LR) of a positive test-result for US was 1.33 (95% CI: 0.8-2.5) and for CT scan 2.53 (95% CI: 1.4-5.0); corresponding post-test probabilities for US 0.57 (95% CI: 0.42-0.70) and for CT 0.71 (95% CI: 0.57-0.83). The LR of a negative test-result was, respectively, 0.60 (95% CI: 0.3-1.3) and 0.18 (95% CI: 0.06-0.5); corresponding post-test probabilities for US 0.37 (95% CI: 0.20-0.57) and for CT 0.15 (95% CI: 0.06-0.32) were calculated., Conclusion: Computed tomography can be used as the imaging modality of choice in patients suspected of intra-abdominal sepsis after abdominal surgery. Because of the low discriminatory power ultrasonography should not be performed as initial diagnostic test.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of upper extremity thrombosis in terms of morbidity, mortality and arm functionality is virtually unknown. We investigated mortality, risk factors, recurrent thrombosis and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with suspected upper extremity thrombosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients suspected of having deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the upper extremity were followed for up to 53 months (mean 21 months). Venography and/or ultrasonography was used for diagnosis. Risk factors were identified from history and thrombophilia laboratory screening. PTS was assessed using a scoring system. Death, recurrent thrombosis and PTS were primary outcome measures. RESULTS: DVT of the upper extremity was diagnosed in 50 of 116 consecutive patients (43%). Malignancy and/or central venous lines were present in 37 of 50 (74%) patients with thrombosis. Inherited thrombophilia was diagnosed in 6 of 30 (20%) and 4 of 33 (12%) of the investigated patients with and without thrombosis, respectively (not significant). Twenty-five patients (50%) with thrombosis died during the follow-up period; this was associated with cancer in 84% of the deaths. Recurrent thrombosis was observed in four patients (8%) during follow-up. Symptoms of PTS were present in 4 of 22 patients (18%) with thrombosis and in 14 of 36 patients (39%) in whom thrombosis was excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Malignancy and central venous lines are major risk factors of upper extremity thrombosis. Thrombophilia seems to be unrelated to the presence or absence of upper extremity thrombosis. Thrombosis in combination with malignancy predicts poor survival. A scoring system can be used to assess the severity of PTS, but it does not discriminate PTS from other causes of arm complaints.

Deep vein thrombosis of the upper extremity is an increasing clinical problem due to the use of long-term indwelling catheters for chemotherapy or long-term feeding. The clinical diagnosis is difficult to make, and various imaging modalities have been used for this purpose. The use of (interventional) radiological procedures has been advancing in recent years. This review describes the clinical background, the imaging modalities that may be employed, treatment options and outcome of patients with upper extremity thrombosis., (Copyright 2004 Springer-Verlag)

Purpose: To assess the feasibility and accuracy of two magnetic resonance (MR) venography methods in a consecutive series of patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis of the upper extremity (DVTUE)., Material and Methods: Consecutive in- and outpatients who were referred for imaging of suspected DVTUE in a large teaching hospital during the period April 2001 to October 2002 were eligible for inclusion. All patients were scheduled to undergo contrast venography with the intention to perform additional MR venography. Both time-of-flight and gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR venography were scheduled. All MR imaging were interpreted independently by consensus of two experienced radiologists, who were blinded for contrast venography outcome. Patients were managed based on contrast venography only., Results: A total of 44 patients were eligible for inclusion. Thirteen patients were excluded (5 refused consent, 2 inability to gain venous access, 2 renal failure, 4 logistic reasons). Contrast venography was performed in 31 patients, and demonstrated DVTUE in 11 patients. MR imaging was not feasible in 10 patients (4 unable to lie flat, 3 claustrophobia, 1 too large for MR scanner, 1 osteosynthesis of shoulder, 1 pacemaker). The sensitivity and specificity of TOF MRV versus Gadolinium 3D MRV was 71% and 89% versus 50% and 80%, respectively., Conclusion: A high number of patients were unable to undergo MR venography in this setting. Contrast-enhanced MRV did not improve diagnostic accuracy. The clinical utility of MR venography in the setting of suspected DVTUE seems disappointing.

We report our technique and results of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in a consecutive series of eight patients with massive PE. We also discuss the possible role of mechanical PE thrombectomy. Eight consecutive patients with acute massive PE, with or without hemodynamic impairment, were treated with mechanical thrombectomy. We used a modified 7-fr hydrolyzer catheter. The treatment was combined with systemic fibrinolysis. From the logistic and technical point we encountered no problems. All patients showed significant improvement while still in the angiography suite. There were no bleeding complications and no other events related to the procedure. Despite the clinical improvement, one patient died shortly after the procedure from cardiac failure. In all patients there was an acute increase in PO2 to normal values. Only a mean of about 50% of all local thrombus could be removed (range 30-80%). The mean PAP pre-intervention decreased only minimally from 42.5 mmHg to 36.3 mmHg post-intervention (not significant). In three patients, the PAP continues to remain high at follow-up. The most important feature of mechanical thrombectomy for massive PE is the immediate improvement of the cardiac output, PO2, and clinical situation, overcoming the first critical hours after massive PE. The amount of thrombus reduction seems not to be an important parameter.

Our objective was to assess the inter-observer and intra-observer agreement in the interpretation of digital subtraction venography (DSV) in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis of the upper extremity (DVTUE). Prospectively, 62 consecutive DSV studies in 54 patients with clinically suspected DVTUE were included. Hard copies were presented without demographic data or original report. All venograms were read twice, at 3-month intervals, by an interventional vascular radiologist (observer 1) and an experienced general radiologist (observer 2). Consensus reading took place in the presence of a third experienced interventional radiologist. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement were assessed using kappa statistics. Initial reading in 62 venograms showed an inter-observer agreement of 71% (kappa 0.48). The inter-observer agreement of the second reading was 83% (kappa 0.71). The agreement with the consensus report ranged from 76 to 94%. The intra-observer agreement for the first and second observer was 94% (kappa 0.89) and 76% (kappa 0.56), respectively ( p<0.01). Digital subtraction venography has moderate to excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement, suggesting that digital subtraction venography is reliable for the diagnosis of DVTUE.

Background: The optimal strategy for diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is less well established for the upper extremities than for the lower extremities. Duplex color ultrasonography can be difficult to perform in the upper extremities because of their anatomy, and contrast venography is often indicated. Moreover, limited data exist on the use of duplex color ultrasonography in this setting., Objective: To determine the accuracy of duplex ultrasonography for diagnosis of DVT of the upper extremities., Design: Prospective study of duplex ultrasonography compared with venography., Setting: A teaching hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Patients: 126 consecutive inpatients and outpatients with suspected DVT of the upper extremities., Measurements: Contrast venography was obtained after duplex ultrasonography and was judged independently. A three-step protocol, involving compression ultrasonography, color ultrasonography, and color Doppler ultrasonography, was used. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for ultrasonography as a whole were calculated. The independent value of each step was assessed., Results: Venography and ultrasonography were not feasible in 23 of 126 patients (18%) and 1 of 126 patients (0.8%), respectively. Results of ultrasonography were inconclusive in 3 patients. Venography demonstrated thrombosis in 44 of 99 patients (44%); in 36 patients (36%), thrombosis was related to intravenous catheters or malignant disease. Sensitivity and specificity of duplex ultrasonography were 82% (95% CI, 70% to 93%) and 82% (CI, 72% to 92%), respectively. Venous incompressibility correlated well with thrombosis, whereas only 50% of isolated flow abnormalities proved to be thrombosis-related., Conclusions: Duplex ultrasonography may be the method of choice for initial diagnosis of patients with suspected thrombosis of the upper extremities. However, in patients with isolated flow abnormalities, contrast venography should be performed.

Rationale and Objectives: To describe the findings of routinely performed angiographic examinations in patients at discharge 2 months after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and at follow-up 1 year later., Methods: The findings of 315 angiographic examinations performed in 190 patients 2 months and 1 year after OLT were reviewed, and the changes at the anastomotic site of the hepatic artery and portal vein were analyzed., Results: Routine angiography 2 months and 1 year after OLT demonstrated a normal anastomosis or low-grade stenosis in 82% and 84% of the patients (hepatic artery) and in 88% and 84% (portal vein), respectively. High-grade stenosis occurred in 9% and 5% of the patients (hepatic artery) and in 3% and 5% (portal vein). Hepatic artery occlusion and portal vein occlusion were observed in two and seven patients and in one and three patients, respectively. In 76% of patients, the anastomotic site of the hepatic artery did not change significantly. In eight patients, a normal anastomosis or a low- or medium-grade stenosis developed into high-grade stenosis or occlusion. Conversely, in nine patients, medium- or high-grade stenosis developed into a normal anastomosis or a low-grade stenosis. In all eight patients who initially had a high-grade stenosis, the hepatic artery proved to be patent at 1 year. In 98% of patients, the anastomotic site of the portal vein did not change significantly. In one patient who initially had a normal anastomosis, occlusion was found at I year., Conclusions: In most patients, routine angiography 2 months and 1 year after OLT demonstrated normal findings or a low-grade stenotic anastomosis of the hepatic artery and portal vein. Significant changes occurred mainly at the anastomotic site of the hepatic artery and could not be predicted by previous angiograms.