Search

Your search keyword '"BURGEAP LYON FRA"' showing total 4 results
Start Over Author "BURGEAP LYON FRA"
4 results on '"BURGEAP LYON FRA"'

1. Recommendations of French and Swiss experts for a better evaluation of the ecotoxicological quality of sediments through the study of benthic communities

Author

Stéphane Pesce, Ferrari, J. D., Bonnineau, C., Casado, C., Apotheloz Perret Gentil, L., Agnès Bouchez, Cheviron, N., Marina Coquery, Dabrin, A., Daouk, S., Alencastro, L. F., Degli Esposti, D., Dubois, N., Egea, E., Folly, E., Foulquier, A., Gateuille, D., Gouy Boussada, V., Lafont, M., Laluc, M., Lods Crozet, B., Loizeau, J. L., Lyautey, E., Martin Laurent, F., Masson, M., Mendoza Lera, C., Samuel Mondy, Monier, J. M., Bernard Montuelle, Christian Mougin, Mulattieri, P., Emmanuel Naffrechoux, Neyra, M., Perceval, O., Reyjol, L., Rossi, M., Santiago, S., Slaveykova, V., Staub, P. F., Tlilli, A., Vivien, R., Wermeille, C., Yari, A., RiverLy (UR Riverly), Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), CENTRE ECOTOX EAWAG EPFL LAUSANNE CHE, Partenaires IRSTEA, Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), Université de Genève (UNIGE), Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et Ecosystèmes Limniques (CARRTEL), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry]), Ecologie fonctionnelle et écotoxicologie des agroécosystèmes (ECOSYS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AgroParisTech, VSA PLATEFORME QUALITE DE L'EAU DUBENDORF LAUSANNE CHE, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), EPFZ DEPARTEMENT DES SCIENCES DE LA TERRE ZURICH CHE, EAWAG DEPARTEMENT DES EAUX DE SURFACE DUBENDORF CHE, FONDATION ROVALTAIN ALIXAN FRA, SERVICE DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT CANTON DE FRIBOURG CHE, Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine (LECA ), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019]), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry]), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon, BURGEAP LYON FRA, DIRECTION GENERALE DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT DIVISION PROTECTION DES EAUX CANTON DE VAUD EPALINGES LAUSANNE CHE, UNIVERSITE DE GENEVE DEPARTEMENT FOREL DES SCIENCES DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT ET DE L'EAU GENEVE CHE, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), ENOVEO LYON FRA, BIOL'EAU SARL BERNEX CHE, Agence Française pour la Biodiversité (AFB), SOLUVAL SANTIAGO COUVET CHE, Environnements, Dynamiques et Territoires de la Montagne (EDYTEM), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and OFFICE FEDERAL DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT DIVISION SOLS ET BIOTECHNOLOGIE SECTION SITES CONTAMINES BERNE CHE

Subjects
COMMUNAUTÉS BENTHIQUES, QUALITÉ ENVIRONNEMENTALE, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, BIOMONITORING, SÉDIMENTS, ECOTOXICOLOGIE
Abstract

National audience; Les sédiments ont un rôle écologique essentiel pour de nombreuses espèces aquatiques. Toutefois, leur capacité à capter les polluants persistants peut participer à long terme à la contamination des milieux aquatiques. Aussi, afin de mieux prendre en compte les impacts écotoxicologiques de la contamination des sédiments et appréhender le risque écologique qui en découle, il est important de disposer de méthodes d'évaluation robustes. Cet article présente la contribution d'un groupe franco-suisse réunissant chercheurs, gestionnaires et représentants de bureaux d'études qui ont travaillé ensemble afin de dresser un état des lieux et formuler des recommandations pour mieux caractériser la contamination des sédiments, les niveaux d'exposition des communautés benthiques et les effets possibles sur ces espèces.

Published
2019

2. Making the best use of ecological and efficiency indicators to guide flood risk project management

Author

Poulard, Christine, Breil, P., Evette, A., Lafont, M., Schmitt, L., Vivien, R., Laluc, M., Hydrologie-Hydraulique (UR HHLY), Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), Ecosystèmes montagnards (UR EMGR), Milieux aquatiques, écologie et pollutions (UR MALY), LES JARDINS D'ARTEMIS VILLEURBANNE FRA, Partenaires IRSTEA, Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), and BURGEAP LYON FRA

Subjects
[SDE]Environmental Sciences
Abstract

International audience; "Flood control" policies have now shifted to "integrated flood risk management", which should also blend nicely within "water management" and "sustainable development". Thus, flood risk reduction strategies are one element to define in coordination with others in a broader picture. From a practical point of view, the relevance of flood management projects must now be examined under several angles. This is where Multi-Criteria Analysis is useful: they assess objectively the impact of projects through different indicators, either to guide decision-making by the project manager, or even to obtain final authorizations and/or funding. Here, we advocate that it could be used as guidance throughout all the stages of the project, to ensure informed decisions at each step, from the definition of the project broad lines to the choices of technical details. We propose here a practical method to define the best compromise between the different disciplines involved by the project, and all along the process. The idea is to make the best use of the competences of each involved person, including technical staffs. Co-conception implies the active participation of all. Therefore, our approach insists that first the objectives have to be explicit and shared, and that solutions must be found to discuss and compare the means of action, using common conceptual and operational views. Our approach still has to be implemented for full-scale studies, in real and varied contexts, to test and improve the method to a fully operational stage. Only then can "guidelines' be written, but always allowing much freedom in the implementation. Future implementations should be followed closely, certainly not to control the process, but to capitalize on the experience. Social sciences should be closely associated to the project, to analyze the paths towards solutions: how different specialists collaborate, which were the expected and unexpected misunderstandings at the beginning, how they were identified and solved, how compromises were made, how each specialist around the table really influenced the final version of the project. Of course, each project is different, but feed-back analysis can always bring insight to the delicate art of project management and help identify obstacles and solutions for fruitful co-conception.

Published
2015

3. Making the best use of ecological and efficiency indicators to guide flood risk project management

Author

Poulard, Christine, Breil, P., Evette, A., Lafont, M., Schmitt, L., Vivien, R., Laluc, M., IRSTEA LYON UR HHLY FRA, IRSTEA GRENOBLE UR EMGR FRA, IRSTEA LYON UR MALY FRA, UNIVERSITE DE STRASBOURG FACULTE DE GEOGRAPHIE ET D'AMANAGEMENT LABORATOIRE IMAGE VILLE ENVIRONNEMENT UMR 7362 UNISTRA CNRS ENGEES FRA, SWISS CENTRE FOR APPLIED ECOTOXICOLOGY EAWAG EPFL LAUSANNE CHE, BURGEAP LYON FRA, Hydrologie-Hydraulique (UR HHLY), Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), Ecosystèmes montagnards (UR EMGR), Milieux aquatiques, écologie et pollutions (UR MALY), LES JARDINS D'ARTEMIS VILLEURBANNE FRA, Partenaires IRSTEA, Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)

Subjects
INONDATION, flooding, MITIGATION DES RISQUES, [SDE]Environmental Sciences
Abstract

International audience; "Flood control" policies have now shifted to "integrated flood risk management", which should also blend nicely within "water management" and "sustainable development". Thus, flood risk reduction strategies are one element to define in coordination with others in a broader picture. From a practical point of view, the relevance of flood management projects must now be examined under several angles. This is where Multi-Criteria Analysis is useful: they assess objectively the impact of projects through different indicators, either to guide decision-making by the project manager, or even to obtain final authorizations and/or funding. Here, we advocate that it could be used as guidance throughout all the stages of the project, to ensure informed decisions at each step, from the definition of the project broad lines to the choices of technical details. We propose here a practical method to define the best compromise between the different disciplines involved by the project, and all along the process. The idea is to make the best use of the competences of each involved person, including technical staffs. Co-conception implies the active participation of all. Therefore, our approach insists that first the objectives have to be explicit and shared, and that solutions must be found to discuss and compare the means of action, using common conceptual and operational views. Our approach still has to be implemented for full-scale studies, in real and varied contexts, to test and improve the method to a fully operational stage. Only then can "guidelines' be written, but always allowing much freedom in the implementation. Future implementations should be followed closely, certainly not to control the process, but to capitalize on the experience. Social sciences should be closely associated to the project, to analyze the paths towards solutions: how different specialists collaborate, which were the expected and unexpected misunderstandings at the beginning, how they were identified and solved, how compromises were made, how each specialist around the table really influenced the final version of the project. Of course, each project is different, but feed-back analysis can always bring insight to the delicate art of project management and help identify obstacles and solutions for fruitful co-conception.

Published
2015

4. Amélioration de la bio-indication des cours d'eau urbains par combinaison des approches descriptives et écohydrologiques

Author

Céline Jézéquel, Pascal Breil, Laurent Schmitt, Stéphanie Bernoud, Anne Vivier, Michel Lafont, Qualité des eaux et prévention des pollutions (UR QELY), Centre national du machinisme agricole, du génie rural, des eaux et forêts (CEMAGREF), Direction régionale de l'environnement de Bourgogne (DIREN Bourgogne), Hydrologie-Hydraulique (UR HHLY), Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2), BURGEAP, ingénierie - études techniques, Environnement Ville Société (EVS), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA Lyon), Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École nationale supérieure d'architecture de Lyon (ENSAL)-École des Mines de Saint-Étienne (Mines Saint-Étienne MSE), Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État (ENTPE)-Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM)-Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 (UJML), Université de Lyon-Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2)-École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon), Biologie des écosystèmes aquatiques (UR BELY), École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon)-Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2)-Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 (UJML), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM)-École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État (ENTPE)-École des Mines de Saint-Étienne (Mines Saint-Étienne MSE), Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-École nationale supérieure d'architecture de Lyon (ENSAL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA Lyon), Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA), DIREN Bourgogne, Ministère de l'Equipement, École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon)-École des Mines de Saint-Étienne (Mines Saint-Étienne MSE), Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2)-Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 (UJML), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA Lyon), Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM)-École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État (ENTPE)-École nationale supérieure d'architecture de Lyon (ENSAL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Environnement, Ville, Société (EVS), École normale supérieure de Lyon (ENS de Lyon)-École des Mines de Saint-Étienne (Mines Saint-Étienne MSE), Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne (UJM)-École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État (ENTPE)-École nationale supérieure d'architecture de Lyon (ENSAL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Milieux aquatiques, écologie et pollutions (UR MALY), DIREN BOURGOGNE DIJON FRA, Partenaires IRSTEA, Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), BURGEAP LYON FRA, and TROUFLEAU, Pascal

Subjects
0106 biological sciences, media_common.quotation_subject, Harmonization, 010501 environmental sciences, Aquatic Science, 01 natural sciences, ecohydrology, [SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences, Ecohydrology, 11. Sustainability, Quality (business), Restoration ecology, ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences, media_common, Biotic index, Hydrology, business.industry, 010604 marine biology & hydrobiology, Environmental resource management, biotic indices, [SHS.GEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Geography, 15. Life on land, 6. Clean water, ecohydrological approaches, urbanized hydrosystems, 13. Climate action, urban water courses, ecosystem functioning, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, Sustainability, Biomonitoring, Environmental science, [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences, business, Surface water, Groundwater
Abstract

International audience; Two approaches are proposed for developing adapted metrics, proposing realistic and sustainable ecologic objectives, and suggesting a management strategy for stream rehabilitation. The first approach implemented a harmonization system of French standardized biotic indices. The second one was based on the development of functional traits (FTrs), which were defined by oligochaete assemblages inhabiting coarse surface sediments and the hyporheic system. The harmonization system allowed to define a weighted general ecological quality. The FTrs characterized an ecological potential (EP) resulting from interactions between physical factors (dynamics of hydrologic exchanges between surface water and groundwater) and chemical factors. An example of using both approaches at the same urbanized site is presented and serves for planning of rehabilitation activities. The benefits, drawbacks and progress of both approaches are discussed.; Utilisation combinée des bio-indicateurs standardisés et d'un bio-indicateur fonctionnel du substrat pour l'évaluation du bon potentiel écologique d'un cours d'eau périurbain.

Published
2009
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results