Search

Craniopharyngiomas are tumors that arise from the remnants of Rathkes pouch along the nasopharynx to the diencephalon. Current standard of care includes maximal surgical resection versus adjuvant radiation if a maximal resection is unfeasible. Pharmacological therapy with MAPK targeted agents is an emerging therapeutic option for tumors with BRAF V600E mutations. We report a 45-year-old male with a strictly third ventricle papillary craniopharyngioma with a BRAF V600E mutation. After initial surgery with subtotal resection, the patient demonstrated durable response to targeted BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy with vemurafenib and cobimetinib. Our report suggests that targeted therapy may reduce the need for radiation and impact surgical interventions in select cases.

While surgery, when possible, remains the mainstay of pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) management, adjuvant therapy has significantly evolved over time. Radiation therapy was commonly used in the late 1990s for tumors that could not be resected or recurred. This resulted in significant late morbidity in this population and mortality related to secondary malignancies and chronic health conditions. Chemotherapy became the mainstay of adjuvant therapy but children still experienced late morbidity secondary to exposure to multiple lines of treatment over time. Targeted therapies emerged after the identification of frequent genetic alterations in the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway including KIAA1549-BRAF fusions and BRAF-V600 mutations and the near universal upregulation of the MAPK pathway in these tumors. Both BRAF and MEK inhibitors have shown efficacy in the treatment of pLGG and have led to prolonged stability in some cases. Multiple phase III clinical trials are now comparing targeted therapy to standard-of-care chemotherapy regimens setting the stage for targeted therapy to replace chemotherapy as the first-line treatment in some cases. Targeted therapy, however, is not without its challenges. There are clear examples of resistance and mechanisms of resistance have not been fully elucidated. There is also no clear duration for these therapies and rebound growth is a well-known phenomenon especially in BRAF-V600 mutant tumors. Targeted therapies are also fairly recent developments and long-term toxicities and functional outcomes are still being monitored. Very young and adolescent/young adult LGGs also carry molecular features that may not be addressed by inhibition of the MAPK pathway. Adjuvant therapy for pLGG has evolved from radiation for all unresectable or residual tumors to molecularly driven targeted therapies with improved quality of life, late effects, and less off-target toxicities. While there is still much to learn in regard to newer targeted therapies for pLGG, the era of targeted therapies for pediatric LGG is upon us. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Approximately 45% of anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) patients harbor a BRAFV600E mutation and are eligible for target therapy (TT) with BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi), nevertheless, few data advocate for this. Hence, we've conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness and safety of BRAFi/MEKi in BRAFV600E ATC patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for BRAFi/MEKi TT in BRAFV600E ATC patients. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) and adverse events (AEs). Results: Nine studies with 168 patients were included. Median follow-up ranged from 2.0 to 47.9 months. 75% of patients had stage IVc. In a pooled analysis, ORR was 68.15% (95% CI 55.31–80.99, I2 = 47%) and DCR was 85.39% (95% CI 78.10–92.68, I2 = 0), with a median DOR of 14.4 months (95% CI 4.6–14.4) and a median PFS of 6.7 months (95% CI 4.7–34.2). Moreover, 1-year OS rate was 64.97% (95% CI 48.76–81.17, I2 = 84%) and 2-years OS rate was 52.08% (95% CI 35.71–68.45, I2 = 79%). Subgroup analysis showed patients in the neoadjuvant setting had higher rates of 1 and 2-years OS and observational studies tended to report higher rates of ORR than clinical trials. No new or unexpected adverse events were found. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated BRAFi/MEKi have a decent activity for BRAFV600E ATC patients, especially in the neoadjuvant setting, with a tolerable safety profile. However, further clinical trials are warranted to investigate these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) often result in significant long-term morbidities despite high overall survival rates. This review aims to consolidate the current understanding of pLGG biology and molecular features and provide an overview of current and emerging treatment strategies. Recent Findings: Surgical resection remains a primary treatment modality, supplemented by chemotherapy and radiotherapy in specific cases. However, recent advances have elucidated the molecular underpinnings of pLGGs, revealing key genetic abnormalities such as BRAF fusions and mutations and the involvement of the RAS/MAPK and mTOR pathways. Novel targeted therapies, including MEK, BRAF and pan-RAF inhibitors, have shown promise in clinical trials, demonstrating significant efficacy and manageable toxicity. Summary: Understanding of pLGGs has significantly improved, leading to more personalized treatment approaches. Targeted therapies have emerged as effective alternatives, potentially reducing long-term toxicities. Future research should focus on optimizing therapy sequences, understanding long-term impacts, and ensuring global accessibility to advanced treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of BRAF inhibitor vermorafenib on the treatment of refractory craniopharyngioma carrying BRAF-V600E mutation. Methods Clinical data of two patients with refractory craniopharyngiomas (CP) were recorded and reviewed. The patients were followed up for 3-5 years. Literature on CPs receiving BRAF or BRAF/MEK therapy was reviewed. Results 1)Papillary CP progressed after multiple operations and radiotherapy in two patients. Further treatments were very difficult. 2)The presence of BRAF-V600E mutation in the tumor was confirmed, and vermorafenib was administered for 6.5-7.5 months. Tumor volumes remarkably shrank by 95%-99%. No tumor relapse was observed during the follow-up of 3-5 years after discontinuation of vemurafenib. 3)The main adverse reaction was rash, which was dose dependent. 4)Literature review showed the volume shrank by 50%-100% in 33/34 tumors during BRAF or BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. Conclusions BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib is effective in treating refractory craniopharyngioma carrying BRAF-V600E mutation with endurable side effects, which may bring some changes to the management of CP in future.

Melanoma is the most aggressive subtype of cancer, with a higher propensity to spread compared to most solid tumors. The application of OMICS approaches has revolutionized the field of melanoma research by providing comprehensive insights into the molecular alterations and biological processes underlying melanoma development and progression. This review aims to offer an overview of melanoma biology, covering its transition from primary to malignant melanoma, as well as the key genes and pathways involved in the initiation and progression of this disease. Utilizing online databases, we extensively explored the general expression profile of genes, identified the most frequently altered genes and gene mutations, and examined genetic alterations responsible for drug resistance. Additionally, we studied the mechanisms responsible for immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance in melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BRAF is the most common serine-threonine protein kinase and regulates signal transduction from RAS to MEK inside the cell. The BRAF is a highly active isoform of RAF kinase. BRAF has two domains such as regulatory and kinase domains. The BRAF inhibitors bind in the c-terminus of the kinase domain and inhibit the downstream pathways. The mutation occurs mainly in the A-loop of the kinase domain. The mutation occurs due to a conversion of valine to glutamate/lysine/arginine/aspartic acid at 600th position. Among the diverse mutations, BRAFV600E is the most common and responsible for numerous cancer such as melanoma, colorectal, ovarian, and thyroid cancer. Due to mutations in RAC1, loss of PTEN, NF1, CCND1, USP28-FBW7 complex, COT overexpression, and CCND1 amplification, the BRAF kinase enzyme developed resistance over the commercially available BRAF inhibitors. There is still unmute urgence for the development of BRAF inhibitors to overcome the persistent limitation such as resistance, mutation, and adverse effects of drugs. In the current study, we described the structure, activation, downstream signaling pathway, and mutation of BRAF. Our group also provided a detailed review of BRAF inhibitors from the last five years (2018–2023) highlighting the structure–activity relationship, mechanistic study, and molecular docking studies. We hope that the current analysis will be a useful resource for researchers and provide chemists a glimpse into the future as design and development of more effective and secure BRAF kinase inhibitors. The development of BRAF inhibitors to overcome the persistent limitation such as resistance, mutation, and adverse effects of drugs. In depth description about different heterocyclic scaffolds (quinoline, imidazole, pyridine, triazole, pyrrole etc.) as BRAF inhibitors from the last five years (2018–2023) highlighting the structure-activity relationship, mechanistic study, and molecular docking studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The diagnosis of hairy-cell leukemia (HCL) and HCL-like disorders including the variant form of HCL (HCL-V), splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL) and splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a challenge in clinical practice. We discuss the major points for the diagnosis of HCL and HCL-like disorders and we propose recommendations for the diagnosis of HCL, treatment in first line and in relapsed/refractory patients. Introduction: Hairy-cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorder (B-CLPD), whose favorable prognosis has changed with the use of purine nucleoside analogs (PNAs), such as cladribine (CDA) or pentostatin (P). However, some patients eventually relapse and over time HCL becomes resistant to chemotherapy. Many discoveries have been made in the pathophysiology of HCL during the last decade, especially in genomics, with the identification of the BRAFV600E mutation and cellular biology, including the importance of signaling pathways as well as tumor microenvironment. All of these new developments led to targeted treatments, especially BRAF inhibitors (BRAFis), MEK inhibitors (MEKis), Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors (BTKis) and recombinant anti-CD22 immunoconjugates. Results: The following major changes or additions were introduced in these updated guidelines: the clinical relevance of the changes in the classification of splenic B-cell lymphomas and leukemias; the increasingly important diagnostic role of BRAFV600E mutation; and the prognostic role of the immunoglobulin (IG) variable (V) heavy chain (H) (IGHV) mutational status and repertory. We also wish to insist on the specific involvement of bones, skin, brain and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of the disease at diagnosis or during the follow-up, the novel targeted drugs (BRAFi and MEKi) used for HCL treatment, and the increasing role of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment. Conclusion: Here we present recommendations for the diagnosis of HCL, treatment in first line and in relapsed/refractory patients as well as for HCL-like disorders including HCL variant (HCL-V)/splenic B-cell lymphomas/leukemias with prominent nucleoli (SBLPN) and splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of BRAF inhibitor vermorafenib on the treatment of refractory craniopharyngioma carrying BRAF-V600E mutation. Methods Clinical data of two patients with refractory craniopharyngiomas (CP) were recorded and reviewed. The patients were followed up for 3-5 years. Literature on CPs receiving BRAF or BRAF/MEK therapy was reviewed. Results 1)Papillary CP progressed after multiple operations and radiotherapy in two patients. Further treatments were very difficult. 2)The presence of BRAF-V600E mutation in the tumor was confirmed, and vermorafenib was administered for 6.5-7.5 months. Tumor volumes remarkably shrank by 95%-99%. No tumor relapse was observed during the follow-up of 3-5 years after discontinuation of vemurafenib. 3)The main adverse reaction was rash, which was dose dependent. 4)Literature review showed the volume shrank by 50%-100% in 33/34 tumors during BRAF or BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. Conclusions BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib is effective in treating refractory craniopharyngioma carrying BRAF-V600E mutation with endurable side effects, which may bring some changes to the management of CP in future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Melanoma, a highly aggressive form of skin cancer, poses a significant global health burden, with 331,647 new cases and 58,645 deaths reported in 2022. The development of melanoma is influenced by various factors, including sunlight exposure and BRAFV600 mutations that activate the MAPK/ERK pathway. The introduction of BRAF and MEK inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment landscape for melanoma patients. However, innate and acquired therapeutic resistance remains a significant challenge. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of BRAF-targeted therapies in melanoma, highlighting the efficacy and limitations of FDA-approved combinations of BRAF and MEK inhibitors such as vemurafenib, dabrafenib, trametinib, and cobimetinib. The review also explores the off-target effects of BRAF inhibitors on endothelial cells, emphasizing the need for more selective therapies to minimize vascular complications and metastatic potential. The article also discusses potential druggable targets, including ERK5, CD73, ALDH1A1, PLA1A, and DMKN, which are promising in addressing diagnostic hurdles and guiding personalized therapeutic decisions. Recent studies on regorafenib, ERK5 signaling, and CD73 inhibition are highlighted as novel strategies to overcome resistance and improve treatment outcomes. The review also delves into the role of advanced therapeutic tools, such as mRNA vaccines and CRISPR-Cas9, in revolutionizing personalized oncology by targeting specific genetic mutations and enhancing immune responses against melanoma. The ongoing synergy between advancing research, targeted interventions, strategic treatment combinations, and cost-effectiveness evaluations offers a promising pathway to elevate patient outcomes in the persistent battle against melanoma significantly.

Abstract Previous studies have shown the clinical benefit of rechallenging the RAF pathway in melanoma patients previously treated with BRAF inhibitors. 44 patients with multiple tumors harboring RAF alterations were rechallenged with a second RAF inhibitor, either as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies, after prior therapy with a first RAF inhibitor. This retrospective observational study results showed that rechallenging with RAFi(s) led to an overall response rate of 18.1% [PR in thyroid (1 anaplastic; 3 papillary), 1 ovarian, 2 melanoma, 1 cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 anaplastic astrocytoma]. The clinical benefit rate was 54.5%; more than 30% of patients had durable responses with PR and SD lasting > 6 months. The median progression-free survival on therapy with second RAF inhibitor in the rechallenge setting either as monotherapy or combination was shorter at 2.7 months (0.9-30.1 m) compared to 8.6 months (6.5-11.5 m) with RAF-1i. However, the median PFS with RAF-2i responders (PFS-2) improved at 12.8 months compared to 11.4 months with RAF-1i responders. The median OS from retreatment with RAF-2i was 15.5 months (11.1-30.8 m). Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and expand targeted therapy options for RAF-aberrant cancers.

BRAFV600E represents the most common BRAF mutation in all human cancers. Among central nervous system (CNS) tumors, BRAFV600E is mostly found in pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG, ~20%) and, less frequently, in pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGG, 5-15%) and adult glioblastomas (GBM, ~5%). The integration of BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) in the treatment of patients with gliomas brought a paradigm shift to clinical care. However, not all patients benefit from treatment due to intrinsic or acquired resistance to BRAF inhibition. Defining predictors of response, as well as developing strategies to prevent resistance to BRAFi and overcome post-BRAFi tumor progression/rebound growth are some of the main challenges at present in the field. In this review, we outline current achievements and limitations of BRAF inhibition in gliomas, with a special focus on potential mechanisms of resistance. We discuss future directions of targeted therapy for BRAFV600E mutated gliomas, highlighting how insights into resistance to BRAFi could be leveraged to improve outcomes.

Dabrafenib plus trametinib is a promising new therapy for patients affected by BRAFV600E-mutant glioma, with high overall response and manageable toxicity. We described a complete and long-lasting response in a case of recurrent anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma CNS WHO-grade 3 BRAFV600E mutated. Due to very poor prognosis, there are a few described cases of highgrade glioma (HGG) patients treated with the combined target therapy as thirdline treatment. The emergence of optimized sequencing strategies and targeted agents, including multimodal and systemic therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib, will continue to broaden personalized therapy in HGG improving patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung cancer, despite recent advancements in survival rates, represents a significant global health burden. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the most prevalent type, is driven largely by activating mutations in Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) and receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), and less in v-RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) and mitogen-activated protein-kinase kinase (MEK), all key components of the RTK-RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Learning from melanoma, the identification of BRAFV600E substitution in NSCLC provided the rationale for the investigation of RAF and MEK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy. The regulatory approval of two RAF-MEK inhibitor combinations, dabrafenib–trametinib, in 2017, and encorafenib–binimetinib, in 2023, signifies a breakthrough for the management of BRAFV600E-mutant NSCLC patients. However, the almost universal emergence of acquired resistance limits their clinical benefit. New RAF and MEK inhibitors, with distinct biochemical characteristics, are in preclinical and clinical development. In this review, we aim to provide valuable insights into the current state of RAF and MEK inhibition in the management of NSCLC, fostering a deeper understanding of the potential impact on patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous studies have shown the clinical benefit of rechallenging the RAF pathway in melanoma patients previously treated with BRAF inhibitors. 44 patients with multiple tumors harboring RAF alterations were rechallenged with a second RAF inhibitor, either as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies, after prior therapy with a first RAF inhibitor. This retrospective observational study results showed that rechallenging with RAFi(s) led to an overall response rate of 18.1% [PR in thyroid (1 anaplastic; 3 papillary), 1 ovarian, 2 melanoma, 1 cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 anaplastic astrocytoma]. The clinical benefit rate was 54.5%; more than 30% of patients had durable responses with PR and SD lasting > 6 months. The median progression-free survival on therapy with second RAF inhibitor in the rechallenge setting either as monotherapy or combination was shorter at 2.7 months (0.9-30.1 m) compared to 8.6 months (6.5-11.5 m) with RAF-1i. However, the median PFS with RAF-2i responders (PFS-2) improved at 12.8 months compared to 11.4 months with RAF-1i responders. The median OS from retreatment with RAF-2i was 15.5 months (11.1-30.8 m). Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and expand targeted therapy options for RAF-aberrant cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare disease that belongs to the group of Dendritic and histiocytic neoplasms. Only 2000 cases have been reported worldwide. It can present with a wide range of symptoms, making a differential diagnosis especially difficult. The primary and most important diagnostic tool is a biopsy of the affected organ/tissue. Nowadays the analysis of different mutations affecting the BRAF and MAPK pathways makes it possible to use targeted treatments, such as vemurafenib, dabrafenib, or cobimetinib. Objective: Our aim is to present the results of three male patients treated in our hematology department. Results: Our BRAF mutation-positive patient presented with retroperitoneal tissue proliferation and diabetes insipidus. The initial therapy of choice was dabrafenib. After 3 months of treatment, 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT) scans showed regression, and after 2 years of treatment, no disease activity was detected. In our second patient, a recurrent febrile state (not explained by other reasons) and diabetes insipidus suggested the diagnosis. A femoral bone biopsy confirmed BRAF-negative ECD. The first-line therapy was interferon-alpha. After 3 months of treatment, no response was observed on 18FDG-PET/CT, and treatment with cobimetinib was started. The control 18FDG-PET/CT imaging was negative. Our third patient was evaluated for dyspnea, and a CT scan showed fibrosis with hilar lymphadenomegaly. A lung biopsy confirmed BRAF-negative ECD. We started treatment with interferon-alpha, but unfortunately, no improvement was observed. Second-line treatment with cobimetinib resulted in a partial metabolic response (PMR) according to control 18FDG-PET/CT. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that an appropriately chosen treatment can lead to a good therapeutic response, but dose reduction may be necessary due to side effects. With advanced targeted therapeutic treatment options, survival and quality of life are significantly improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The development of potent BRAF inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment of BRAF mutant cancers, in particular, melanomas. However, BRAF mutant cancers of other entities, e.g., colorectal cancers, display distinctly reduced responses to BRAF inhibitors. In addition, the emergence of cancer resistance to BRAF inhibitor treatment poses a severe problem. The reactivation of MAPK/ERK signaling was identified as an important mode of BRAF inhibitor resistance. Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), which are prominent anticancer drug targets in their own right, play a crucial role in the development of drug resistance to BRAF inhibitors and the reactivation of MAPK/ERK signal transduction, as well as the establishment of bypassing signaling pathways. MAPK reactivation can occur via increased expression of RTKs, altered RTK signaling, and post-translational processes, among others. This review summarizes the influence of pertinent RTKs on BRAF mutant cancers and BRAF inhibitor resistance and outlines possible and proven ways to circumvent BRAF-associated resistance mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Activation of neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) by platelet derived growth factor (PDGF)-C sustains melanoma invasiveness. Therefore, in the search of novel agents capable of reducing melanoma spreading, PDGF-C/NRP-1 interaction was investigated as a potential druggable target. Since the PDGF-C region involved in NRP-1 binding is not yet known, based on the sequence and structural homology between PDGF-C and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), we hypothesized that the NRP-1 b1 domain region involved in the interaction with VEGF-A might also be required for PDGF-C binding. Hence, this region was selected from the protein crystal structure and used as target in the molecular docking procedure. In the following virtual screening, compounds from a DrugBank database were used as query ligands to identify agents potentially capable of disrupting NRP-1/PDGF-C interaction. Among the top 45 candidates with the highest affinity, five drugs were selected based on the safety profile, lack of hormonal effects, and current availability in the market: the antipsychotic pimozide, antidiabetic gliclazide, antiallergic cromolyn sodium, anticancer tyrosine kinase inhibitor entrectinib, and antihistamine azelastine. Analysis of drug influence on PDGF-C in vitro binding to NRP-1 and PDGF-C induced migration of human melanoma cells expressing NRP-1, indicated gliclazide and entrectinib as the most specific agents that were active at clinically achievable and non-toxic concentrations. Both drugs also reverted PDGF-C ability to stimulate extracellular matrix invasion by melanoma cells resistant to BRAF inhibitors. The inhibitory effect on tumor cell motility involved a decrease of p130Cas phosphorylation, a signal transduction pathway activated by PDGF-C-mediated stimulation of NRP-1.

Copyright of Dermatologie Pro Praxi is the property of SOLEN sro and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. BRAF mutation is present in about 10% of CRC patients and is associated with a poor response to chemotherapy. These patients have a relatively poor prognosis. This review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of BRAF inhibitors in BRAF-mutated CRC patients. A literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase, and clinical trials relevant to BRAF inhibitors in CRC were included. Data were extracted for efficacy and safety variables. Two randomized clinical trials (n = 765) and eight non-randomized trials (n = 281) were included based on inclusion criteria. In RCTs, an overall response was reported in 23% of the patients treated with BRAF inhibitor-based regimens compared to 2.5% with control regimens. The hazard ratio of overall survival was also significantly better with triplet encorafenib therapy at 0.52 (95% CI = 0.39–0.70). In single-arm trials, ORR was 17% and 34% in two-drug and three-drug regimens, respectively. BRAF inhibitor-based regimens were safe and effective in the treatment of BRAF-mutated CRC. Large-scale randomized trials are needed to find a suitable population for each regimen. PROSPERO registration No. CRD42023471627. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Melanoma cancer represents the most lethal type of skin cancer originating from the malignant transformation of melanocyte cells. Almost 50% of melanomas show the activation of BRAF mutations. The identification and characterization of BRAF mutations led to the development of specific drugs that radically changed the therapeutic approach to melanoma. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature according to a written protocol before conducting the study. This article is based on previously conducted studies. We identified articles by searching electronic databases (Medline, Google Scholar and PubMed). We used a combination of "melanoma", "Braf-Mek inhibitors", " targeted therapy" and "oral side effects". Results: Eighteen studies were reported in this article showing the relationship between the use of targeted therapy in melanoma cancer and the development of oral side effects, such as mucositis, hyperkeratosis and cellular proliferation. Conclusion: Targeted therapy plays an important role in the treatment of melanoma cancer, showing a notable increase in response rate, prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in BRAF-mutated melanoma patients. Oral side effects represent a common finding over the course of treatment. However, these adverse effects can be easily managed in a multidisciplinary approach involving collaboration between medical oncologists and dental doctors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionErdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare disease that belongs to the group of Dendritic and histiocytic neoplasms. Only 2000 cases have been reported worldwide. It can present with a wide range of symptoms, making a differential diagnosis especially difficult. The primary and most important diagnostic tool is a biopsy of the affected organ/tissue. Nowadays the analysis of different mutations affecting the BRAF and MAPK pathways makes it possible to use targeted treatments, such as vemurafenib, dabrafenib, or cobimetinib.ObjectiveOur aim is to present the results of three male patients treated in our hematology department.ResultsOur BRAF mutation-positive patient presented with retroperitoneal tissue proliferation and diabetes insipidus. The initial therapy of choice was dabrafenib. After 3 months of treatment, 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT) scans showed regression, and after 2 years of treatment, no disease activity was detected. In our second patient, a recurrent febrile state (not explained by other reasons) and diabetes insipidus suggested the diagnosis. A femoral bone biopsy confirmed BRAF-negative ECD. The first-line therapy was interferon-alpha. After 3 months of treatment, no response was observed on 18FDG-PET/CT, and treatment with cobimetinib was started. The control 18FDG-PET/CT imaging was negative. Our third patient was evaluated for dyspnea, and a CT scan showed fibrosis with hilar lymphadenomegaly. A lung biopsy confirmed BRAF-negative ECD. We started treatment with interferon-alpha, but unfortunately, no improvement was observed. Second-line treatment with cobimetinib resulted in a partial metabolic response (PMR) according to control 18FDG-PET/CT.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that an appropriately chosen treatment can lead to a good therapeutic response, but dose reduction may be necessary due to side effects. With advanced targeted therapeutic treatment options, survival and quality of life are significantly improved.

Summary: Background: BRAF V600 mutations are common in melanoma, thyroid, and non-small-cell lung cancers. Despite dabrafenib and trametinib being standard treatments for certain cancers, their efficacy across various solid tumours remains unelucidated. The BELIEVE trial assessed the efficacy of dabrafenib and trametinib in solid tumours with BRAF V600E/R or non-V600 BRAF mutations. Methods: Between October 1, 2019, and June 2022, at least 50 patients with measurable and seven without measurable diseases examined were enrolled in a subcohort of the BELIEVE trial (NCCH1901, jRCTs031190104). BRAF mutated solid tumour cases other than BRAF V600E mutated colorectal cancer, melanoma, and non-small cell lung cancer cases were included. Patients with solid tumours received dabrafenib (150 mg) twice daily and trametinib (2 mg) once daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity was observed. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). Bayesian analysis was performed using a prior distribution with a 30% expected response rate [Beta (0.6, 1.4)]. Findings: Fourty-seven patients with measurable disease, mainly with the BRAF V600E mutation (94%), and three others with non-V600E BRAF mutations (V600R, G466A, and N486_P490del) were enrolled. The primary sites included the thyroid gland, central nervous system, liver, bile ducts, colorectum, and pancreas. The confirmed ORR was 28.0%; the expected value of posterior distribution [Beta (14.6, 37.4)] was 28.1%, although the primary endpoint was achieved, not exceeding an unexpectedly high response rate of 60% obtained using Bayesian analysis. The disease control rate (DCR) was 84.0%. The median PFS was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]; 4.2–7.2 months, 87.8% at 6 months). Responses were observed across seven tumour types. Median OS was 9.7 months (95% CI, 7.5–12.2 months). Additional patients without measurable diseases had a median PFS of 4.5 months. Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with previous reports, with 45.6% of patients experiencing grade ≥3 AEs. Interpretation: This study reported promising efficacy against BRAF V600-mutant tumours. Dabrafenib and trametinib would offer a new therapeutic option for rare cancers, such as high-grade gliomas, biliary tract cancer, and thyroid cancer. Funding: This study was funded by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (22ck0106622h0003) and a Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant (19EA1008).

Melanoma is the most aggressive subtype of cancer, with a higher propensity to spread compared to most solid tumors. The application of OMICS approaches has revolutionized the field of melanoma research by providing comprehensive insights into the molecular alterations and biological processes underlying melanoma development and progression. This review aims to offer an overview of melanoma biology, covering its transition from primary to malignant melanoma, as well as the key genes and pathways involved in the initiation and progression of this disease. Utilizing online databases, we extensively explored the general expression profile of genes, identified the most frequently altered genes and gene mutations, and examined genetic alterations responsible for drug resistance. Additionally, we studied the mechanisms responsible for immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance in melanoma.

Simple Summary: Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) risk is quite common, potentially significant, and often underestimated. In this context, an advanced DDI detection software (Drug-PIN, V. 2/23) was used to assess the DDIs in a retrospective cohort of 177 patients with metastatic BRAF-mutated cutaneous melanoma treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of DDIs on the toxicity profile. Here, we report that the median Drug-PIN score significantly increased when the target combination was added to the patient's home therapy (p-value < 0.0001). Moreover, DDIs emerged as a critical issue for the risk of treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity. Both Drug-PIN score (p = 0.0291) and traffic light (p = 0.00821) were significant predictors of cardiotoxicity onset. Our results suggest evaluating DDIs in the clinical practice of melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors to reduce potentially avoidable toxicities and improve treatment tolerability and patients' quality of life. Background: BRAF and MEK inhibition is a successful strategy in managing BRAF-mutant melanoma, even if the treatment-related toxicity is substantial. We analyzed the role of drug–drug interactions (DDI) on the toxicity profile of anti-BRAF/anti-MEK therapy. Methods: In this multicenter, observational, and retrospective study, DDIs were assessed using Drug-PIN software (V 2/23). The association between the Drug-PIN continuous score or the Drug-PIN traffic light and the occurrence of treatment-related toxicities and oncological outcomes was evaluated. Results: In total, 177 patients with advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma undergoing BRAF/MEK targeted therapy were included. All grade toxicity was registered in 79% of patients. Cardiovascular toxicities occurred in 31 patients (17.5%). Further, 94 (55.9%) patients had comorbidities requiring specific pharmacological treatments. The median Drug-PIN score significantly increased when the target combination was added to the patient's home therapy (p-value < 0.0001). Cardiovascular toxicity was significantly associated with the Drug-PIN score (p-value = 0.048). The Drug-PIN traffic light (p = 0.00821) and the Drug-PIN score (p = 0.0291) were seen to be significant predictors of cardiotoxicity. Patients with low-grade vs. high-grade interactions showed a better prognosis regarding overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0045) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.012). The survival analysis of the subgroup of patients with cardiological toxicity demonstrated that patients with low-grade vs. high-grade DDIs had better outcomes in terms of OS (p = 0.0012) and a trend toward significance in PFS (p = 0.068). Conclusions: DDIs emerged as a critical issue for the risk of treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity. Our findings support the utility of DDI assessment in melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In recent years, an increasing trend in the incidence of melanoma has been observed in Europe. Although early diagnosis and prompt intervention with local resection often results in positive outcomes, conversely, metastatic disease is still clinically challenging with a poor prognosis and a 5-year survival of around 30%. The growing awareness of melanoma biology and of antitumor immune responses has allowed the development of novel therapies targeted at specific molecular alterations occurring at advanced stages. This real-world analysis examined patients with melanoma in Italy, focusing on treatment patterns, outcome, time to discontinuation (TTD), and resource consumption. Methods: Two retrospective observational analyses were conducted for BRAF+ patients with metastatic melanoma and those with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in an adjuvant setting, retrieving data from the administrative databases covering 13.3 million residents. The cohort melanoma BRAF+ in metastatic setting comprised 729 patients with targeted therapy (TT) (n = 671 with TT as first line and 79 as second line). Results: Median TTD was 10.6 months in first line and 8.1 months in second line. Median overall survival from the start of first TT line was 27 months and was 11.8 months for patients with brain metastasis. In the dabrafenib plus trametinib patients, main healthcare resource consumption tended to increase in the presence of brain metastasis. The cohort with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy under adjuvant therapy (n = 289) included 8% patients treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib or tested BRAF+, 5% BRAF wild-type, and 10% under immunotherapy. Conclusion: Our findings provided an overview on TT utilization on metastatic melanoma patients in real clinical practice and highlighted an increased burden in brain metastatic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mutation in the BRAF V600E gene in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) occurs in 510% of cases and is a significant problem due to the aggressive course and extremely unfavorable prognosis. In recent years, new treatment options for BRAF mutated CRC have been emerging, for example, combinations of BRAF inhibitors, anti-EGFR antibodies with optional addition of MEK inhibitors. The possibility of local treatment methods is also being discussed. Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of triple targeted therapy in BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. On the example of 2 clinical cases of long-term treatment of patients with this molecular subtype, possible treatment options are discussed.

Introduction: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is an indolent B-cell lymphoproliferative disease. BRAF V600E mutation is detected in nearly all classical HCL cases which offers the possibility of targeted therapy.Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of low-dose vemurafenib as well as to assess the long term outcome of HCL patients treated with this drug at the Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology at Semmelweis University.Methods: We report on 10 patients with classical HCL treated with low-dose vemurafenib at our Department between 2013 and 2022.Results: As a result of fixed time low-dose vemurafenib treatment, 5 of 10 patients (5/10) achieved partial remission, 4 (4/10) had stable disease, and 1 (1/10) had MRD positivity. No patients achieved complete remission. The median progression-free survival was 28.5 months while the overall survival was 82 months.Conclusion: We confirm that low dose of vemurafenib is effective and safe in the vast majority of patients with HCL. This small-molecule oral treatment allows to gain valuable time—months or even years—before further, usually parenteral treatment options have to be given or before previous treatment has to be repeated. There are also promising data supporting the combination of vemurafenib with other drugs for the treatment of HCL patients which could provide even further possibility to bridge treatment.

We describe a case of a 46-year-old woman diagnosed with localized PTC 20 years ago, having already undergone several treatments with iodine-131 and then treatment with lenvatinib for metastatic disease, to which she developed intolerance. In 2020, in addition to pleural, thoracic, and abdominal lymph node metastasis, progression with symptomatic vertebral bone metastasis was detected, which led to the equation of new therapeutic options. In this context, a genetic/molecular test was carried out, which identified the BRAF V600E mutation and enabled the start of treatment with dabrafenib/trametinib since June 2020. This treatment allowed functional gain, symptomatic relief, and stabilization of the disease. It demonstrates how, in rare tumors, the personalized medicine approach can bring new treatment possibilities.

Cutaneous melanoma is a common cancer and cases have steadily increased since the mid 70s. For some patients, early diagnosis and surgical removal of melanomas is lifesaving, while other patients typically turn to molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies as treatment options. Easy sampling of melanomas allows the scientific community to identify the most prevalent mutations that initiate melanoma such as the BRAF, NRAS, and TERT genes, some of which can be therapeutically targeted. Though initially effective, many tumors acquire resistance to the targeted therapies demonstrating the need to investigate compensatory pathways. Immunotherapies represent an alternative to molecular targeted therapies. However, inter-tumoral immune cell populations dictate initial therapeutic response and even tumors that responded to treatment develop resistance in the long term. As the protocol for combination therapies develop, so will our scientific understanding of the many pathways at play in the progression of melanoma. The future direction of the field may be to find a molecule that connects all of the pathways. Meanwhile, noncoding RNAs have been shown to play important roles in melanoma development and progression. Studying noncoding RNAs may help us to understand how resistance – both primary and acquired – develops; ultimately allow us to harness the true potential of current therapies. This review will cover the basic structure of the skin, the mutations and pathways responsible for transforming melanocytes into melanomas, the process by which melanomas metastasize, targeted therapeutics, and the potential that noncoding RNAs have as a prognostic and treatment tool.

Thyroid cancers require complex and heterogeneous therapies with different impacts on renal function. In our systematic literature review, we analyzed several aspects: renal function assessment, the impact of radiotherapy and thyroid surgery on kidney functioning, and mechanisms of nephrotoxicity of different chemotherapy, targeted and immunologic drugs. Our study revealed that the renal impact of thyroid cancer therapy can be a limiting factor in all radiotherapy, surgery, and pharmacological approaches. It is advisable to conduct a careful nephrological follow-up imposing the application of body surface based estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) formulas for the purpose of an early diagnosis and treatment of renal failure, guaranteeing the therapy continuation to thyroid cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Melanoma is considered a lethal and treatment-resistant skin cancer with a high risk of recurrence, making it a major clinical challenge. Our earlier studies documented that 1,25(OH)2D3 and its low-calcaemic analogues potentiate the effectiveness of dacarbazine and cediranib, a pan-VEGFR inhibitor. In the current study, a set of patient-derived melanoma cultures was established and characterised as a preclinical model of human melanoma. Thus, patient-derived cells were preconditioned with 1,25(OH)2D3 and treated with cediranib or vemurafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, depending on the BRAF mutation status of the patients enrolled in the study. 1,25(OH)2D3 preconditioning exacerbated the inhibition of patient-derived melanoma cell growth and motility in comparison to monotherapy with cediranib. A significant decrease in mitochondrial respiration parameters, such as non-mitochondrial oxygen consumption, basal respiration and ATP-linked respiration, was observed. It seems that 1,25(OH)2D3 preconditioning enhanced cediranib efficacy via the modulation of mitochondrial bioenergetics. Additionally, 1,25(OH)2D3 also decreased the viability and mobility of the BRAF+ patient-derived cells treated with vemurafenib. Interestingly, regardless of the strict selection, cancer-derived fibroblasts (CAFs) became the major fraction of cultured cells over time, suggesting that melanoma growth is dependent on CAFs. In conclusion, the results of our study strongly emphasise that the active form of vitamin D, 1,25(OH)2D3, might be considered as an adjuvant agent in the treatment of malignant melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway signaling pathway is one of the most commonly mutated pathways in human cancers. In particular, BRAF alterations result in constitutive activation of the rapidly accelerating fibrosarcoma-extracellular signal-regulated kinase-MAPK significant pathway, leading to cellular proliferation, survival, and dedifferentiation. The role of BRAF mutations in oncogenesis and tumorigenesis has spurred the development of targeted agents, which have been successful in treating many adult cancers. Despite advances in other cancer types, the morbidity and survival outcomes of patients with glioma have remained relatively stagnant. Recently, there has been recognition that MAPK dysregulation is almost universally present in paediatric and adult gliomas. These findings, accompanying broad molecular characterization of gliomas, has aided prognostication and offered opportunities for clinical trials testing targeted agents. The use of targeted therapies in this disease represents a paradigm shift, although the biochemical complexities has resulted in unexpected challenges in the development of effective BRAF inhibitors. Despite these challenges, there are promising data to support the use of BRAF inhibitors alone and in combination with MEK inhibitors for patients with both low-grade and high-grade glioma across age groups. Safety and efficacy data demonstrate that many of the toxicities of these targeted agents are tolerable while offering objective responses. Newer clinical trials will examine the use of these therapies in the upfront setting. Appropriate duration of therapy and durability of response remains unclear in the glioma patient cohort. Longitudinal efficacy and toxicity data are needed. Furthermore, access to these medications remains challenging outside of clinical trials in Australia and New Zealand. Compassionate access is limited, and advocacy for mechanism of action-based drug approval is ongoing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung cancer is the malignant tumor with the highest incidence and mortality rate in China, among which non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85%. BRAF mutation occurs about 1.5% to 5.5% in NSCLC patients, while BRAF V600 accounts for about 30% to 50% of all BRAF mutations. The overall prognosis of patients with BRAF-mutation is poor. At present, there are many clinical trials on BRAF-mutation NSCLC and new drugs constantly emerging. However, there is no standardized consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of BRAF-mutation NSCLC in China. The expert group of the Lung Cancer Professional Committee of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association formulated this consensus by integrating foreign and domestic BRAF-mutation-related guidelines, consensus, and existing clinical trials, and combining with Chinese experts′ clinical experience in the diagnosis and treatment of BRAF-mutation NSCLC. This consensus provides systematic recommendations for the clinical diagnosis and treatment process, rational drug choice, and adverse events management of BRAF-mutation NSCLC, aiming to provide reference for the standard of diagnosis and treatment of BRAF-mutation NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review : Pediatric low-grade gliomas and glioneuronal tumors (pLGG) account for approximately 30% of pediatric CNS neoplasms, encompassing a heterogeneous group of tumors of primarily glial or mixed neuronal-glial histology. This article reviews the treatment of pLGG with emphasis on an individualized approach incorporating multidisciplinary input from surgery, radiation oncology, neuroradiology, neuropathology, and pediatric oncology to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of specific interventions against tumor-related morbidity. Complete surgical resection can be curative for cerebellar and hemispheric lesions, while use of radiotherapy is restricted to older patients or those refractory to medical therapy. Chemotherapy remains the preferred first-line therapy for adjuvant treatment of the majority of recurrent or progressive pLGG. Recent Findings: Technologic advances offer the potential to limit volume of normal brain exposed to low doses of radiation when treating pLGG with either conformal photon or proton RT. Recent neurosurgical techniques such as laser interstitial thermal therapy offer a "dual" diagnostic and therapeutic treatment modality for pLGG in specific surgically inaccessible anatomical locations. The emergence of novel molecular diagnostic tools has enabled scientific discoveries elucidating driver alterations in mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway components and enhanced our understanding of the natural history (oncogenic senescence). Molecular characterization strongly supplements the clinical risk stratification (age, extent of resection, histological grade) to improve diagnostic precision and accuracy, prognostication, and can lead to the identification of patients who stand to benefit from precision medicine treatment approaches. Summary: The success of molecular targeted therapy (BRAF inhibitors and/or MEK inhibitors) in the recurrent setting has led to a gradual and yet significant paradigm shift in the treatment of pLGG. Ongoing randomized trials comparing targeted therapy to standard of care chemotherapy are anticipated to further inform the approach to upfront management of pLGG patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

More than one half melanoma patients have BRAF gene mutation. BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib is an effective medication for these patients. However, acquired resistance is generally inevitable, the mechanisms of which are not fully understood. Cell senescence and senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) are involved in extensive biological functions. This study was designed to explore the possible role of senescent cells in vemurafenib resistance. The results showed that vemurafenib treatment induced BRAF-mutant but not wild-type melanoma cells into senescence, as manifested by positive β-galactosidase staining, cell cycle arrest, enlarged cellular morphology, and cyclin D1/p-Rb pathway inhibition. However, the senescent cells induced by vemurafenib (SenV) did not display DNA damage response, p53/p21 pathway activation, reactive oxygen species accumulation, decline of mitochondrial membrane potential, or secretion of canonical SASP cytokines. Instead, SenV released other cytokines, including CCL2, TIMP2, and NGFR, to protect normal melanoma cells from growth inhibition upon vemurafenib treatment. Xenograft experiments further confirmed that vemurafenib induced melanoma cells into senescence in vivo. The results suggest that vemurafenib can induce robust senescence in BRAFV600E melanoma cells, leading to the release of resistance-conferring cytokines. Both the senescent cells and the resistant cytokines could be potential targets for tackling vemurafenib resistance.

Melanoma resistance to BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) is often accompanied by a switch from a proliferative to an invasive phenotype. Therefore, the identification of signaling molecules involved in the development of metastatic properties by resistant melanoma cells is of primary importance. We have previously demonstrated that activation of neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-C confers melanoma cells with an invasive behavior similar to that of BRAFi resistant tumors. Aims of the present study were to evaluate the role of PDGF-C/NRP-1 autocrine loop in the acquisition of an invasive and BRAFi-resistant phenotype by melanoma cells and the effect of its inhibition on drug resistance and extracellular matrix (ECM) invasion. Furthermore, we investigated whether PDGF-C serum levels were differentially modulated by drug treatment in metastatic melanoma patients responsive or refractory to BRAFi as single agents or in combination with MEK inhibitors (MEKi). The results indicated that human melanoma cells resistant to BRAFi express higher levels of PDGF-C and NRP-1 as compared to their susceptible counterparts. Overexpression occurs early during development of drug resistance and contributes to the invasive properties of resistant cells. Accordingly, silencing of NRP-1 or PDGF-C reduces tumor cell invasiveness. Analysis of PDGF-C in the serum collected from patients treated with BRAFi or BRAFi+MEKi, showed that in responders PDGF-C levels decrease after treatment and raise again at tumor progression. Conversely, in non-responders treatment does not affect PDGF-C serum levels. Thus, blockade of NRP-1 activation by PDGF-C might represent a new therapeutic approach to counteract the invasiveness of BRAFi-resistant melanoma.

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway signaling pathway is one of the most commonly mutated pathways in human cancers. In particular, BRAF alterations result in constitutive activation of the rapidly accelerating fibrosarcoma–extracellular signal–regulated kinase–MAPK significant pathway, leading to cellular proliferation, survival, and dedifferentiation. The role of BRAF mutations in oncogenesis and tumorigenesis has spurred the development of targeted agents, which have been successful in treating many adult cancers. Despite advances in other cancer types, the morbidity and survival outcomes of patients with glioma have remained relatively stagnant. Recently, there has been recognition that MAPK dysregulation is almost universally present in paediatric and adult gliomas. These findings, accompanying broad molecular characterization of gliomas, has aided prognostication and offered opportunities for clinical trials testing targeted agents. The use of targeted therapies in this disease represents a paradigm shift, although the biochemical complexities has resulted in unexpected challenges in the development of effective BRAF inhibitors. Despite these challenges, there are promising data to support the use of BRAF inhibitors alone and in combination with MEK inhibitors for patients with both low-grade and high-grade glioma across age groups. Safety and efficacy data demonstrate that many of the toxicities of these targeted agents are tolerable while offering objective responses. Newer clinical trials will examine the use of these therapies in the upfront setting. Appropriate duration of therapy and durability of response remains unclear in the glioma patient cohort. Longitudinal efficacy and toxicity data are needed. Furthermore, access to these medications remains challenging outside of clinical trials in Australia and New Zealand. Compassionate access is limited, and advocacy for mechanism of action-based drug approval is ongoing.

Simple Summary: Selective inhibitors of mutant BRAFV600E (BRAFi) have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma patients and represent a powerful example of the efficacy of targeted therapy. However, one of the main limitations of BRAFi is that treated cells put in place several adaptive response mechanisms, which initially confer drug tolerance and later provide a gateway for the insurgence of genetically acquired resistance mechanisms. We previously discovered that pigmentation is one of these adaptive response mechanisms. Upon BRAFi treatment, those cells that increase their pigmentation level are more resistant to BRAFi than those that do not. Here, we demonstrate that pigmentation limits BRAFi activity through an increase in the number of intracellular mature melanosomes. We also show that this increase derives from increased maturation and/or trafficking. In addition, we identify the miRNAs and mRNAs that are involved in these biological processes. Finally, we provide the rationale for testing a new combinatorial therapeutic strategy that aims at increasing BRAFi efficacy by blocking the adaptive responses that they elicit. This strategy is based on the combined use of BRAFi with inhibitors of pigmentation, specifically inhibitors of melanosome maturation and/or trafficking. Background: The ability to increase their degree of pigmentation is an adaptive response that confers pigmentable melanoma cells higher resistance to BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) compared to non-pigmentable melanoma cells. Methods: Here, we compared the miRNome and the transcriptome profile of pigmentable 501Mel and SK-Mel-5 melanoma cells vs. non-pigmentable A375 melanoma cells, following treatment with the BRAFi vemurafenib (vem). In depth bioinformatic analyses (clusterProfiler, WGCNA and SWIMmeR) allowed us to identify the miRNAs, mRNAs and biological processes (BPs) that specifically characterize the response of pigmentable melanoma cells to the drug. Such BPs were studied using appropriate assays in vitro and in vivo (xenograft in zebrafish embryos). Results: Upon vem treatment, miR-192-5p, miR-211-5p, miR-374a-5p, miR-486-5p, miR-582-5p, miR-1260a and miR-7977, as well as GPR143, OCA2, RAB27A, RAB32 and TYRP1 mRNAs, are differentially expressed only in pigmentable cells. These miRNAs and mRNAs belong to BPs related to pigmentation, specifically melanosome maturation and trafficking. In fact, an increase in the number of intracellular melanosomes—due to increased maturation and/or trafficking—confers resistance to vem. Conclusion: We demonstrated that the ability of pigmentable cells to increase the number of intracellular melanosomes fully accounts for their higher resistance to vem compared to non-pigmentable cells. In addition, we identified a network of miRNAs and mRNAs that are involved in melanosome maturation and/or trafficking. Finally, we provide the rationale for testing BRAFi in combination with inhibitors of these biological processes, so that pigmentable melanoma cells can be turned into more sensitive non-pigmentable cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The clinical management of metastatic melanoma has been changed by BRAF (BRAFi) and MEK inhibitors (MEKi), which represent a standard treatment for BRAF-mutant melanoma. In oligoprogressive melanoma patients with BRAF mutations, target therapy can be combined with loco-regional radiotherapy (RT). However, the association of BRAF/MEK inhibitors and RT needs to be carefully monitored for potential increased toxicity. Despite the availability of some reports regarding the tolerability of RT + target therapy, data on simultaneous RT and BRAFi/MEKi are limited and mostly focused on the BRAFi vemurafenib. Here, we report a series of metastatic melanoma patients who received fractioned RT regimens for oligoprogressive disease in combination with the BRAFi dabrafenib and the MEKi trametinib, which have continued beyond progression. None of the cases developed relevant adverse events while receiving RT or interrupted dabrafenib and trametinib administration. These cases suggest that a long period of dabrafenib/trametinib interruption during radiotherapy for oligoprogressive disease can be avoided. Prospective trials are warranted to assess the efficacy and safety of the contemporary administration of BRAF/MEK inhibitors and radiotherapy for oligoprogressive disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: To date, one of the reference therapies for the treatment of mutated BRAF metastatic melanoma is based on the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Although many trials have compared BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination therapies, there is no evidence of superiority in the use of one of the three combinations over the others. Furthermore, comparative data on safety are scarce. To help clinicians tailor patients' treatment using the most appropriate BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations, we performed a meta-analysis of adverse events associated with each treatment combination. Purpose: This meta-analysis summarizes the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) of BRAFi and MEKi. Methods: A systematic search of Medline/PubMed was conducted to identify suitable articles published in English up to 31 December 2021. The primary outcomes were profiles for all-grade and grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs, and the analysis of single side effects belonging to both categories. Results: The overall incidence of treatment-related all-grade Aes was 99% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.97–1.00) and 97% for Trametinib (95% CI: 0.92–0.99; I2 = 66%) and Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.94–0.99; I2 = 0%). In combined therapies, the rate was 98% for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.96–0.99; I2 = 77%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.96–1.00). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 69% of cases for Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.50–0.84; I2 = 71%), 68% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.61–0.74), and 72% for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.65–0.79; I2 = 84%). The most common grade 1–2 AEs were pyrexia (43%) and fatigue (28%) for Dabrafenib + Trametinib and diarrhea for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (52%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (34%). The most common AEs of grade 3 or higher were pyrexia, rash, and hypertension for Dabrafenib + Trametinib (6%), rash and hypertension for Encorafenib + Binimetinib (6%), and increased AST and ALT for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (10%). Conclusions: Our study provides comprehensive data on treatment-related adverse events of BRAFi and MEKi combination therapies, showing related toxicity profiles to offer a helpful tool for clinicians in the choice of therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the category of mature B-cell neoplasms, splenic B-cell lymphoma and leukemia were clearly identified and include four distinct entities: hairy cell leukemia (HCL), splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL) and the new entity named splenic B-cell lymphoma/leukemia with prominent nucleoli (SBLPN). The BRAFV600E mutation is detected in nearly all HCL cases and offers a possibility of targeted therapy. BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) represent effective and promising therapeutic approaches in patients with relapsed/refractory HCL. Vemurafenib and dabrafenib were assessed in clinical trials. The BRAFV600E mutation is missing in SDRPL and SBLPN: mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (MAP2K1) mutations were found in 40% of SBLPN and VH4-34+ HCL patients, making possible to use MEK inhibitors (MEKi) such as trametinib, cobimetinib or binimetinib in monotherapy or associated with BRAFi. Other mutations may be associated and other signaling pathways involved, including the B-cell receptor signaling (BCR), cell cycle, epigenetic regulation and/or chromatin remodeling. In SDRPL, cyclin D3 (CCND3) mutations were found in 24% of patients, offering the possibility of using cell cycle inhibitors. Even if new emerging drugs, particularly those involved in the epigenetic regulation, have recently been added to the therapeutic armamentarium in HCL and HCL-like disorders, purine nucleoside analogs more and more associated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, are still used in the frontline setting. Thanks to the recent discoveries in genetics and signaling pathways in HCL and HCL-like disorders, new targeted therapies have been developed, have proven their efficacy and safety in several clinical trials and become essential in real life: BRAFi, MEKi, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and anti-CD22 immunotoxins. New other drugs emerged and have to be assessed in the future. In this article, we will discuss the main mutations identified in HCL and HCL-like disorders and the signaling pathways potentially involved in the pathogenesis of the different hairy cell disorders. We will discuss the results of the recent clinical trials, which will help us to propose an algorithm useful in clinical practice and we will highlight the different new drugs that may be used in the near future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the present review, we briefly discuss the breakthrough advances in precision medicine using a tumor-agnostic approach and focus on BRAF treatment modalities, the mechanisms of resistance and the diagnostic approach in cancers with BRAF mutations. Tumor-type agnostic drug therapies work across cancer types and present a significant novel shift in precision cancer medicine. They are the consequence of carefully designed clinical trials that showed the value of tumor biomarkers, not just in diagnosis but in therapy guidance. Six tumor-agnostic drugs (with seven indications) have been approved through October 2022 by FDA. The first tumor-agnostic treatment modality was pembrolizumab for MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors, approved in 2017. This was followed by approvals of larotrectinib and entrectinib for cancers with NTRK fusions without a known acquired resistance mutation. In 2020, pembrolizumab was approved for all TMB-high solid cancers, while a PD-L1 inhibitor dostarlimab-gxly was approved for dMMR solid cancers in 2021. A combination of BRAF/MEK inhibitors (dabrafenib/trametinib) was approved as a tumor-agnostic therapy in June 2022 for all histologic types of solid metastatic cancers harboring BRAFV600E mutations. In September 2022, RET inhibitor selpercatinib was approved for solid cancers with RET gene fusions. Conclusion. Precision cancer medicine has substantially improved cancer diagnostics and treatment. Tissue type-agnostic drug therapies present a novel shift in precision cancer medicine. This approach rapidly expands to provide treatments for patients with different cancers harboring the same molecular alteration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most melanomas have BRAF V600E/K mutations, making V600 an important target for precision treatment of melanoma, and it can often be blocked by a combination of BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors has also greatly improved the treatment outcome of patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive advanced melanoma. Clinical trials are also underway to determine the best first-line treatment and the sequence of combination therapies for these patients. This paper reviewed the latest progress in the treatment of BRAF V600 mutation-positive advanced melanoma in the era of precision medicine.