Search

Over the coming decades, global freshwater withdrawals are expected to grow, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Unless there are significant improvements in the efficiency of water use by economies, freshwater stress, crises, and scarcity will worsen. This paper explores further the economic relationship between water use efficiency and scarcity. Because growing scarcity of freshwater in many regions and countries is not adequately reflected in markets, there are often insufficient incentives for investment and innovation to improve the efficiency of water use. To explore further changes in water use efficiency across countries, we conduct a panel analysis of water productivity changes for 130 countries from 1995 to 2020. Countries with lower initial levels of water use efficiency tended to have higher water productivity growth, whereas more agriculturally dependent economies displayed lower improvements in water use efficiency. Better institutional quality and capacity for innovation may also increase water use efficiency. We discuss the implications of these results for improving water use productivity in economies, and in particular, the opportunities and challenges for improving water markets and trades to alleviate water scarcity. We conclude by identifying further areas of research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Water withdrawals are expected to continue growing, further straining available freshwater resources for economies. This review focuses on two key relationships between water and economic growth for developed and developing countries. Rising freshwater withdrawals and stress are directly related to how our economies use water to develop and grow. There is also concern that increasing water scarcity will impact economic growth across countries and regions. Unless there is a marked improvement in the water intensity of countries, economic growth will be the most important driver of increasing water withdrawals and scarcity. Although analysis of the impact of freshwater stress on the growth of economies is inconclusive, there is mounting evidence of an impact at the river basin and sub-national level. Decoupling rising water use from growth will require major water management reforms. Two of them are discussed here: Ending excessive subsidization of irrigation and reallocating subsidies for water supply and sanitation to expand delivery in developing countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given that few ecosystems on the Earth have been unaffected by humans, restoring them holds great promise for stemming the biodiversity crisis and ensuring ecosystem services are provided to humanity. Nonetheless, few studies have documented the recovery of ecosystems globally or the rates at which ecosystems recover. Even fewer have addressed the added benefit of actively restoring ecosystems versus allowing them to recover without human intervention following the cessation of a disturbance. Our meta-analysis of 400 studies worldwide that document recovery from large-scale disturbances, such as oil spills, agriculture and logging, suggests that though ecosystems are progressing towards recovery following disturbances, they rarely recover completely. This result reinforces conservation of intact ecosystems as a key strategy for protecting biodiversity. Recovery rates slowed down with time since the disturbance ended, suggesting that the final stages of recovery are the most challenging to achieve. Active restoration did not result in faster or more complete recovery than simply ending the disturbances ecosystems face. Our results on the added benefit of restoration must be interpreted cautiously, because few studies directly compared different restoration actions in the same location after the same disturbance. The lack of consistent value added of active restoration following disturbance suggests that passive recovery should be considered as a first option; if recovery is slow, then active restoration actions should be better tailored to overcome specific obstacles to recovery and achieve restoration goals. We call for a more strategic investment of limited restoration resources into innovative collaborative efforts between scientists, local communities and practitioners to develop restoration techniques that are ecologically, economically and socially viable.

A levy on fossil fuels can support and restore ecosystems that help to stem climate change. A levy on fossil fuels can support and restore ecosystems that help to stem climate change., Author(s): Edward B. Barbier, Ricardo Lozano, Carlos Manuel Rodríguez, Sebastian Troëng Author Affiliations: A tropical forest in the Bribri Indigenous region of Costa Rica. Credit: Ivan Kashinsky/Panos A man rides [...]