1. Tumoral programmed cell death 1 (PD1) expression in endometrial carcinoma is a prognostic marker for patient outcome.
- Author
-
Feroz B, Pan TL, Leitner K, Ebner C, Steger K, Kildal W, Kristensen G, Zeimet AG, Hackl H, Fiegl H, Marth C, and Wieser V
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Aged, B7-H1 Antigen metabolism, B7-H1 Antigen genetics, B7-H1 Antigen biosynthesis, Interferon-gamma metabolism, Adult, Endometrial Neoplasms pathology, Endometrial Neoplasms metabolism, Endometrial Neoplasms genetics, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor genetics, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor metabolism, Biomarkers, Tumor metabolism, Biomarkers, Tumor genetics
- Abstract
Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently demonstrated benefit in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma. This retrospective study investigated immune checkpoint molecules in endometrial carcinoma as they pertain to the molecular subtypes, clinical outcomes, and predictive value., Methods: Tumoral RNA expression of genes controlling the immune checkpoint, programmed cell death 1 (PD1, encoded by PDCD1 ), its ligand (PDL1, encoded by CD274 ), and interferon gamma ( IFNG ) was determined in 239 endometrial carcinoma tissues by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and compared with endometrial tissue from 25 controls. A total of 81 endometrial carcinoma tissues were analyzed using the ProMiSe molecular classification, and patient trajectories were analyzed for the entire cohort. Findings were validated in an independent cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; n=548)., Results: PD1 , PDL1, and IFNG expression was significantly higher in endometrial carcinoma when compared with non-malignant control tissue with a mean expression of 0.12, 0.05, and 0.05 in control tissue and 0.44, 0.31, and 0.35 in endometrial carcinoma, respectively. POLE- mutated and mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) (immunologically hot) tumors showed the highest expression of PD1 and IFNG . Increased expression of PD1 , PDL1, and IFNG was associated with improved recurrence-free (HR 0.32, p<0.001; HR 0.30, p<0.001; HR 0.47, p=0.012, respectively), disease-specific (HR 0.38, p<0.001; HR 0.29, p<0.001; HR 0.45, p=0.017, respectively), and overall survival (HR 0.56, p=0.003; HR 0.38, p<0.001; HR 0.58, p=0.006, respectively). Cox regression confirmed the prognostic significance of PD1 for recurrence-free survival (HR 0.39, p=0.009) and PDL1 for overall survival (HR 0.55, p=0.037). The prognostic value of tumoral PD1 on recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival was confirmed in the TCGA cohort., Conclusions: Tumoral gene expression controlling the PD1 immune checkpoint, particularly expressed in "hot tumors", predicted recurrence-free, disease-specific, and overall survival in patients with endometrial carcinoma in two independent cohorts. Evaluation of these genes could be used to stratify patients who qualify for immune checkpoint inhibitors, which warrants prospective clinical trials., Competing Interests: Competing interests: BF reports travel expenses from Roche, Pfizer, and Lilly. TLP reports travel expenses from MEDahead. CE reports travel expenses from GSK, PharmaMar, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Lilly. KL reports support for attending meeting and travel from Gilead, GSK, Eisai, and Roche. HF reports no conflicts of interest. GK reports no conflicts of interest. WK reports no conflicts of interest. KS reports travel expenses from Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, and Pharma Mar. AGZ reports consulting fees from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, GSK, MSD, Novartis, PharmaMar, Roche-Diagnostics, and Seagen; honoraria from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, GSK, MSD, Novartis, PharmaMar, Roche, and Seagen; travel expenses from Astra Zeneca, Gilead, and Roche; participation on advisory boards from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche, and Seagen. HH reports research funding from CatalYm and Secarna. VW reports honoraria from Roche and Novartis; travel expenses from Roche; participation on advisory boards from Novartis. CM reports consulting fees from Roche, Novartis, Amgen, MSD, PharmaMar, Astra Zeneca, GSK, and Seagen; honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Amgen, MSD, PharmaMar, Astra Zeneca, GSK, and Seagen; travel expenses from Roche and Astra Zeneca; participation on advisory boards from Roche, Novartis, Amgen, MSD, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, PharmaMar, GSK, and Seagen. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article., (© IGCS and ESGO 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF