Search

Summary Background A novel approach for managing malignant pleural mesothelioma, surgery for mesothelioma after radiotherapy (SMART), consisting of a short accelerated course of high-dose, hemithoracic, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy was developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of the SMART protocol. Methods In this single-centre, phase 2 trial, patients aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, with histologically proven, resectable, cT1–3N0M0 disease who had previously untreated malignant pleural mesothelioma were eligible for inclusion. Patients received 25 Gy in five daily fractions over 1 week to the entire ipsilateral hemithorax with a concomitant 5 Gy boost to high risk areas followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy within 1 week. Adjuvant chemotherapy was offered to patients with ypN+ disease on final pathology. The primary endpoint was feasibility, which was defined as the number of patients with 30-day perioperative treatment-related death (grade 5 events) or morbidity (grade 3 or 4 events). A key secondary endpoint was cumulative incidence of distant recurrence. The final analysis was done on an intention-to-treat basis (including all eligible patients). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00797719 . Findings Between Nov 1, 2008, and Oct 31, 2019, 102 patients were enrolled onto the trial and 96 eligible patients were treated with SMART on protocol and included in the analysis. Extrapleural pneumonectomy was done at a median of 5 days (range 2–12) after completing IMRT. 47 (49%) patients had 30-day perioperative grade 3–4 events and one (1%) patient died within 30 days perioperatively (grade 5 event; pneumonia). After a median follow-up of 46·8 months (IQR 13·4–61·2), the 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence was 62 (63·3% [95% CI 52·3–74·4]). The most common first sites of recurrence were the contralateral chest (33 [46%] of 72 patients) and the peritoneal cavity (32 [44%]). Interpretation Results from this study suggest that extrapleural pneumonectomy after radiotherapy can be done with good early and long-term results. However, minimising grade 4 events on the protocol is technically demanding and might affect survival beyond the post-operative period. Funding Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation Mesothelioma Research Fund.

Increasing evidence indicates that local hypofractionated radiotherapy (LRT) can elicit both immunogenic and immunosuppressive local and systemic immune responses. We thus hypothesized that blockade of LRT-induced immunosuppressive responses could augment the antitumor effects and induce an abscopal response. In this study, we found that the upregulation of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the mesothelioma tumor microenvironment after nonablative oligofractionated irradiation significantly limited the success of irradiation. Using DEREG mice, which allow conditional and efficient depletion of Foxp3+ Tregs by diphtheria toxin injection, we observed that transient Foxp3+ Treg depletion immediately after nonablative oligofractionated irradiation provided synergistic local control and biased the T cell repertoire toward central and effector memory T cells, resulting in long-term cure. Furthermore, this combination therapy showed significant abscopal effect on the nonirradiated tumors in a concomitant model of mesothelioma through systemic activation of cytotoxic T cells and enhanced production of IFN-γ and granzyme B. Although local control was preserved with one fraction of nonablative irradiation, three fractions were required to generate the abscopal effect. PD-1 and CTLA-4 were upregulated on tumor-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in irradiated and nonirradiated tumors, suggesting that immune checkpoint inhibitors could be beneficial after LRT and Foxp3+ Treg depletion. Our findings are applicable to the strategy of immuno-radiotherapy for generating optimal antitumor immune responses in the clinical setting. Targeting Tregs immediately after a short course of irradiation could have a major impact on the local response to irradiation and its abscopal effect.

Introduction: The addition of durvalumab after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in unresectable stage III NSCLC significantly improves survival. The benefit of this approach in elderly patients is controversial given the toxicity associated with CRT and, thus, may be underutilized. We sought to investigate the outcomes of elderly patients treated with CRT without or without durvalumab at our center. Methods: We reviewed all stage III patients with NSCLC treated with CRT between 2018 and 2020. Patients were analyzed on the basis of age: less than 70 years and 70 years and older. The end points evaluated were treatment patterns, toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results: The baseline characteristics including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and comorbidities were similar among the 115 patients (44 elderly, 71 young). Completion rates of CRT (100%, 97%) and chemotherapy dose intensity (97%, 97%) were high in elderly and young patients, respectively. There was a trend toward increased hospitalizations in elderly patients because of infections (27% versus 13%, p = 0.08). Of those who did not have primary progression after CRT, 78% of eldery and 81% of young patients received durvalumab. The incidence of grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events was 9% in elderly and 6% in young patients (p = 0.67). The median progression-free survival was similar (15.6 versus 10.5 mo, p = 0.10), even after adjusting for comorbidities (hazard ratio = 0.6, p = 0.09). The 12-month overall survival rates were 78% in the elderly and 76% in young patients (p = 0.98). Conclusions: Well-selected elderly patients can be treated safely with CRT followed by durvalumab with similar survival benefits compared with their younger counterparts. We would advocate for the referral of all elderly patients for oncologic assessment to avoid undertreatment.

Summary Background Whole breast irradiation delivered once per day over 3–5 weeks after breast conserving surgery reduces local recurrence with good cosmetic results. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) delivered over 1 week to the tumour bed was developed to provide a more convenient treatment. In this trial, we investigated if external beam APBI was non-inferior to whole breast irradiation. Methods We did this multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in 33 cancer centres in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Women aged 40 years or older with ductal carcinoma in situ or node-negative breast cancer treated by breast conserving surgery were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either external beam APBI (38·5 Gy in ten fractions delivered twice per day over 5–8 days) or whole breast irradiation (42·5 Gy in 16 fractions once per day over 21 days, or 50 Gy in 25 fractions once per day over 35 days). Patients and clinicans were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR), analysed by intention to treat. The trial was designed on the basis of an expected 5 year IBTR rate of 1·5% in the whole breast irradiation group with 85% power to exclude a 1·5% increase in the APBI group; non-inferiority was shown if the upper limit of the two-sided 90% CI for the IBTR hazard ratio (HR) was less than 2·02. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00282035 . Findings Between Feb 7, 2006, and July 15, 2011, we enrolled 2135 women. 1070 were randomly assigned to receive APBI and 1065 were assigned to receive whole breast irradiation. Six patients in the APBI group withdrew before treatment, four more did not receive radiotherapy, and 16 patients received whole breast irradiation. In the whole breast irradiation group, 16 patients withdrew, and two more did not receive radiotherapy. In the APBI group, a further 14 patients were lost to follow-up and nine patients withdrew during the follow-up period. In the whole breast irradiation group, 20 patients were lost to follow-up and 35 withdrew during follow-up. Median follow-up was 8·6 years (IQR 7·3–9·9). The 8-year cumulative rates of IBTR were 3·0% (95% CI 1·9–4·0) in the APBI group and 2·8% (1·8–3·9) in the whole breast irradiation group. The HR for APBI versus whole breast radiation was 1·27 (90% CI 0·84–1·91). Acute radiation toxicity (grade ≥2, within 3 months of radiotherapy start) occurred less frequently in patients treated with APBI (300 [28%] of 1070 patients) than whole breast irradiation (484 [45%] of 1065 patients, p Interpretation External beam APBI was non-inferior to whole breast irradiation in preventing IBTR. Although less acute toxicity was observed, the regimen used was associated with an increase in moderate late toxicity and adverse cosmesis, which might be related to the twice per day treatment. Other approaches, such as treatment once per day, might not adversely affect cosmesis and should be studied. Funding Canadian Institutes for Health Research and Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance.

Introduction Detailed guidelines regarding the use of radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are currently lacking because of the rarity of the disease, the wide spectrum of clinical presentations, and the paucity of high-level data on individual treatment approaches. Methods In March 2017, a multidisciplinary meeting of mesothelioma experts was cosponsored by the U.S. National Cancer Institute, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Research, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. Among the outcomes of this conference was the foundation of detailed, multidisciplinary consensus guidelines. Results Here we present consensus recommendations on the use of radiation therapy for MPM in three discrete scenarios: (1) hemithoracic radiation therapy to be used before or after extrapleural pneumonectomy; (2) hemithoracic radiation to be used as an adjuvant to lung-sparing procedures (i.e., without pneumonectomy); and (3) palliative radiation therapy for focal symptoms caused by the disease. We discuss appropriate simulation techniques, treatment volumes, dose fractionation regimens, and normal tissue constraints. We also assess the role of particle beam therapy, specifically, proton beam therapy, for MPM. Conclusion The recommendations provided in this consensus statement should serve as important guidelines for developing future clinical trials of treatment approaches for MPM.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an intractable disease with an extremely poor prognosis. Our clinical protocol for MPM of subablative radiotherapy (RT) followed by radical surgery achieved better survival compared to other multimodal treatments, but local relapse and metastasis remain a problem. This subablative RT elicits an antitumoral immune response that is limited by the immunosuppressive microenvironment generated by regulatory T (Treg) cells. The antitumor effect of immunotherapy to simultaneously modulate the immune activation and the immune suppression after subablative RT has not been investigated in MPM. Herein, we demonstrated a rationale to combine interleukin-15 (IL-15) superagonist (IL-15SA) and glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related protein (GITR) agonist (DTA-1) with subablative RT in mesothelioma. IL-15SA boosted the systemic expansion of specific antitumoral memory CD8+ T cells that were induced by RT in mice. Their effect, however, was limited by the up-regulation and activation of Treg cells in the radiated tumor microenvironment. Hence, selective depletion of intratumoral Treg cells through DTA-1 enhanced the benefit of subablative RT in combination with IL-15SA. The addition of surgical resection of the radiated tumor in combination with IL-15SA and DTA-1 maximized the benefit of RT and was accompanied by a reproducible abscopal response in a concomitant tumor model. These data support the development of clinical trials in MPM to test such treatment options for patients with locally advanced or metastatic tumors.

Purpose To explore and quantify the relationship between esophageal dose and toxicity in the setting of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods and Materials This analysis was conducted on the basis of a prospective study of patients treated with SBRT at our institution from October 2004 to December 2015. Most patients were treated with 54 Gy/3 fractions, 48 Gy/4 fractions alternate days, or 60 Gy/8 fractions daily. Toxicity was prospectively graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of esophageal toxicity as a function of radiation therapy dose, in 2-Gy-equivalent dose, using an α/β ratio of 3 Gy in the linear-quadratic model. Results A total of 632 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 20.8 months. Median overall survival was 35.3 months. The rate of late or acute grade ≥1 esophageal toxicity, including dysphagia, odynophagia, and esophagitis, was 3.3% (n = 21). The median (range) esophageal doses were 11.8 Gy (0.2-48.2 Gy), 10.34 Gy (0.17-44.5 Gy), and 9.63 Gy (0.08-43 Gy) for Dmax, D1cc, and D2cc, respectively. A 15% risk of esophageal toxicity was associated with a 2-Gy-equivalent dose of Dmax 141.6 Gy, D1cc 123.61 Gy, and D2cc 117.6 Gy. Of the 21 patients who experienced esophageal toxicity, only 1 patient had grade 3 toxicity, and the remainder had grade 2 or lower toxicity. Conclusions The observed rate of toxicity was low, despite some patients receiving relatively high doses to the esophagus. A prospective study in a targeted population, for example patients with ultracentral tumors, may provide more accurate dose–toxicity parameters.

Summary Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive disease that continues to be associated with poor outcomes. Although, traditionally this disease is considered to be resistant to radiotherapy, more recent evidence suggests that radiotherapy can produce positive outcomes. Over the past 15 years, the development of new, highly conformal radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), has enabled investigators to optimise the delivery of high-dose radiotherapy to the whole of the hemithorax. Prospective single-arm trials have shown that the median survival of patients who have completed high-dose hemithoracic radiotherapy after extrapleural pneumonectomy could reach 23·9–39·4 months independent of the chemotherapeutic response, suggesting that IMRT could potentially have an intrinsic benefit to this subset of patients. These observations have led to a change in practice, with the introduction of adjuvant pleural IMRT after pleurectomy-decortication and the development of induction-accelerated hemithoracic IMRT followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy. This Review focuses on recent observations on the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma, with particular emphasis on the results of clinical trials that evaluate the role of high-dose hemithoracic radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE This study is a multi-institutional pooled analysis specific to imaging-based local control of spinal metastases in patients previously treated with conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT) and then treated with re-irradiation stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the spine as salvage therapy, the largest such study to date. METHODS The authors reviewed cases involving 215 patients with 247 spinal target volumes treated at 7 institutions. Overall survival was calculated on a patient basis, while local control was calculated based on the spinal target volume treated, both using the Kaplan-Meier method. Local control was defined as imaging-based progression within the SBRT target volume. Equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) was calculated for the cEBRT and SBRT course using an α/β of 10 for tumor and 2 for both spinal cord and cauda equina. RESULTS The median total dose/number of fractions of the initial cEBRT was 30 Gy/10. The median SBRT total dose and number of fractions were 18 Gy and 1, respectively. Sixty percent of spinal target volumes were treated with single-fraction SBRT (median, 16.6 Gy and EQD2/10 = 36.8 Gy), and 40% with multiple-fraction SBRT (median 24 Gy in 3 fractions, EQD2/10 = 36 Gy). The median time interval from cEBRT to re-irradiation SBRT was 13.5 months, and the median duration of patient follow-up was 8.1 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 6- and 12-month overall survival rates were 64% and 48%, respectively; 13% of patients suffered a local failure, and the 6- and 12-month local control rates were 93% and 83%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) < 70 as a significant prognostic factor for worse overall survival, and single-fraction SBRT as a significant predictive factor for better local control. There were no cases of radiation myelopathy, and the vertebral compression fracture rate was 4.5%. CONCLUSIONS Re-irradiation spine SBRT is effective in yielding imaging-based local control with a clinically acceptable safety profile. A randomized trial would be required to determine the optimal fractionation.

BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of the spine provides superior tumor control, but vertebral compression fractures are increased and the pathophysiological process underneath is not well understood. Data on histopathological changes, particularly after salvage SBRT (sSBRT) following conventional irradiation, are scarce. OBJECTIVE To investigate surgical specimens after sSBRT and primary SBRT (pSBRT) regarding histopathological changes. METHODS We assessed 704 patients treated with spine SBRT 2006 to 2012. Thirty patients underwent salvage surgery; 23 histopathological reports were available. Clinical and histopathological findings were analyzed for sSBRT (69.6%) and pSBRT (30.4%). RESULTS Mean time to surgery after sSBRT/pSBRT was 8.3/10.3 mo (P = .64). Reason for surgery included pain (sSBRT/pSBRT: 12.5%/71.4%, P = .25), fractures (sSBRT/pSBRT: 37.5%/28.6%, P = .68), and neurological symptoms (sSBRT/pSBRT: 68.8%/42.9%, P = .24). Radiological tumor progression after sSBRT/pSBRT was seen in 71.4%/42.9% (P = .2). Most specimens displayed viable/proliferative tumor (sSBRT/pSBRT: 62.5%/71.4%, P = .68 and 56.3%/57.1%, P = .97). Few specimens showed soft tissue necrosis (sSBRT/pSBRT: 20%/28.6%, P = .66), osteonecrosis (sSBRT/pSBRT: 14.3%/16.7%, P = .89), or bone marrow fibrosis (sSBRT/pSBRT: 42.9%/33.3%, P = .69). Tumor bed necrosis was more common after sSBRT (81.3%/42.9%, P = .066). Radiological tumor progression correlated with viable/proliferative tumor (P = .03/P = .006) and tumor bed necrosis (P = .03). Fractures were increased with bone marrow fibrosis (P = .07), but not with osteonecrosis (P = .53) or soft tissue necrosis (P = .19). Neurological symptoms were common with radiological tumor progression (P = .07), but not with fractures (P = .18). CONCLUSION For both, sSBRT and pSBRT, histopathological changes were similar. Neurological symptoms were attributable to tumor progression and pathological fractures were not associated with osteonecrosis or tumor progression.

Cytotoxic CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) can contribute to the benefit of hypofractionated radiation, but programmed cell death pathways (programmed cell death 1 and programmed cell death ligand 1 [PD-1/PD-L1]) may provide a mechanism of tumor immune escape. We therefore reviewed the influence of PD-1/PD-L1 and CD8+ TILs on survival after accelerated hypofractionated hemithoracic radiation followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).Sixty-nine consecutive patients undergoing the protocol of Surgery for Mesothelioma after Radiation Therapy (SMART) between November 2008 and February 2016 were analyzed for the presence of PD-L1 on tumor cells, PD-1 on inflammatory cells, and CD8+ TILs. Comparison was made with a cohort of patients undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy after induction chemotherapy (n = 14) and no induction (n = 2) between March 2005 and October 2008. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells ≥1% was considered positive. CD8+ TILs and PD-1 expression were scored as a percentage of positive cells.PD-L1 was negative in 75% of MPM after completion of SMART. CD8+ TILs ranged between 0.24% and 8.47% (median 2%). CD8+ TILs ≥2% was associated with significantly better survival in epithelioid MPM (median survival 3.7 years vs 2.3 years in CD8+ TILs2%; P = .02). PD-L1 positivity was associated with worse survival in biphasic MPM (median survival, 0.4 years vs 1.5 years in biphasic PD-L1 negative tumors; P = .07) after SMART. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that epithelioid MPM, nodal disease, and CD8+ TILs were independent predictors of survival after SMART.The influence of tumor microenvironment on survival differs between epithelioid and nonepithelioid MPM. CD8+ TILs is an independent factor associated with better survival in epithelioid MPM treated with SMART.

Introduction Patients with ultracentral lung tumors, whose planning target volume directly contacts or overlaps the proximal bronchial tree, trachea, esophagus, pulmonary vein, or pulmonary artery, may be at higher risk of toxicity when treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We reviewed the outcomes and toxicities of ultracentral lung tumors and compared the results with central lung tumors. Patients and Methods A review of our institutional prospective database of patients treated with lung SBRT from January 2006 to December 2015 was conducted. Patients with central tumors (RTOG 0813 definition) and ultracentral tumors were included. Results In total, 180 central and 26 ultracentral tumors were analyzed. The majority of patients received 60 Gy in 8 fractions (53.9%) or 48 Gy in 4 fractions (29.1%). The rates of any grade 2 or higher toxicity were 8.4% (n = 16) in the central group and 7.9% (n = 2) in the ultracentral group (P = .88). There were no observed grade 4 or 5 toxicities. In the nonmetastatic primary lung cancer cohort (n = 182), the median overall survival was 39.4 months versus 23.8 months (P = .40) and cause-specific survival was 55.5 months versus 28.2 months (P = .34) for central and ultracentral tumors, respectively. The 2-year cumulative local, regional, and distant failure rates were 3.3% versus 0 (P = .36), 9.1% versus 5.0% (P = .5), and 17.7% versus 18.7% (P = .63) in the central and ultracentral groups, respectively. Conclusion In our experience, with strict adherence to planning parameters, SBRT to ultracentral tumors resulted in effective local control and no excessive risk of toxicity compared to central tumors.

Objective To evaluate a new protocol of accelerated hemithoracic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) for patients with resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Methods A total of 25 Gy of radiation was delivered in 5 daily fractions over 1 week to the entire ipsilateral hemithorax with concomitant boost of 5 Gy to volumes at high risk based on computed tomography and positron emission tomography scan findings. EPP was performed at 6 ± 2 days after the end of radiation therapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was offered to patients with ypN2 disease. Results A total of 62 patients were included between November 2008 and October 2014. One patient died in the hospital 2 months after EPP, for an operative mortality of 1.6%, and 2 died after discharged from the hospital for an overall treatment-related mortality (grade 5 toxicity) of 4.8%. Twenty-four patients (39%) developed grade 3 to 5 (grade 3+) complications. On final pathology, 94% of the patients were stage III or IV, and 52% had ypN2 disease. The median survival for all patients as an intention-to-treat analysis was 36 months. The median overall survival and disease-free survival was 51 and 47 months, respectively, in epithelial subtypes, compared with 10 and 8 months in biphasic subtypes ( P = .001). Ipsilateral chest recurrence occurred in 8 patients. Conclusions Accelerated hemithoracic IMRT followed by EPP has become our preferred approach for resectable MPM. The results have been encouraging in patients with epithelial subtype.

We report our experience in salvaging spinal metastases initially irradiated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), who subsequently progressed with imaging-confirmed local tumor progression, and were re-irradiated with a salvage second SBRT course to the same level.From a prospective database, 56 metastatic spinal segments in 40 patients were identified as having been irradiated with a salvage second SBRT course to the same level. In addition, 24 of 56 (42.9%) segments had initially been irradiated with conventional external beam radiation therapy before the first course of SBRT. Local control (LC) was defined as no progression on magnetic resonance imaging at the treated segment, and calculated according to the competing risk model. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated for each patient treated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method.The median salvage second SBRT total dose and number of fractions was 30 Gy in 4 fractions (range, 20-35 Gy in 2-5 fractions), and for the first course of SBRT was 24 Gy in 2 fractions (range, 20-35 Gy in 1-5 fractions). The median follow-up time after salvage second SBRT was 6.8 months (range, 0.9-39 months), the median OS was 10.0 months, and the 1-year OS rate was 48%. A longer time interval between the first and second SBRT courses predicted for better OS (P=.02). The crude LC was 77% (43/56), the 1-year LC rate was 81%, and the median time to local failure was 3.0 months (range, 2.7-16.7 months). Of the 13 local failures, 85% (11/13) and 46% (6/13) showed progression within the epidural space and paraspinal soft tissues, respectively. Absence of baseline paraspinal disease predicted for better LC (P.01). No radiation-induced vertebral compression fractures or cases of myelopathy were observed.A second course of spine SBRT, most often with 30 Gy in 4 fractions, for spinal metastases that failed initial SBRT is a feasible and efficacious salvage treatment option.

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of radiation dose to substructures of the heart in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients on non-cancer-related deaths.Patients treated with lung SBRT at a single institution from 2005 to 2013 were included. The heart and its substructures were contoured, and dose was calculated including mean, max, and max 10 cc dose. Clinical variables including stage, histology, age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), preexisting cardiac disease, pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, diffusion capacity), and smoking status were explored for association with non-cancer-related deaths in univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses. Heart dosimetric parameters were correlated with the risk of radiation pneumonitis (RP) using UVA and MVA.A total of 189 patients were included with median age of 76 years (range, 48-93 years). Of these patients, 45.5% were female, 27.5% were T2, 16.9% were current smokers, 64% had preexisting cardiac risk factors, and 34.5% had CCI score of ≥ 3. Mean lung dose ± SD was 456 ± 231 cGy. Heart max, mean, and 10 cc doses were 1867 ± 1712 cGy, 265 ± 269 cGy, and 1150 ± 1075 cGy, respectively. There were 14 (7.4%) ≥ Grade 2 RP and 3 (1.6%) were ≥ Grade 3. The median overall survival was 37.3 months (95% confidence interval, 29.8-45.3 months). On UVA, female gender (P .01), higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (P = .01), cardiac risk (P .01), CCI (P .01), and bilateral ventricles max dose (P = .02) were associated with non-cancer-related deaths; on MVA, bilateral ventricles max dose was significant (P = .05). No heart parameters were associated with RP.Higher bilateral ventricles max dose is associated with poorer survival. Heart dose parameters should be considered when planning patients for SBRT.

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of interstitial lung disease (ILD) on radiation pneumonitis (RP) and overall survival (OS) in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).Patients treated with lung SBRT from 2004 to 2015 were included. Pretreatment computed tomography scans were reviewed and classified for interstitial changes by thoracic radiologists using American Thoracic Society guidelines and Washko and Kazerooni scores. RP was scored prospectively using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. Pretreatment imaging characteristics, clinical variables, and dosimetry were assessed by univariate (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA). OS was assessed by the log-rank test, and the impact of ILD on OS was assessed by Cox regression.Of the 537 patients assessed, 39 had interstitial changes (13 usual interstitial pneumonia [UIP], 24 possible UIP, and 2 inconsistent with UIP). RP was significantly higher in patients with ILD than in patients without ILD (grade ≥ 2, 20.5% vs. 5.8%; P .01; grade ≥ 3, 10.3% vs. 1.0%; P .01). Two of 3 grade 5 RP had imaging features of ILD. On UVA, ILD, Washko score, lung parameters performance status, and dose were significant predictors of grade ≥ 2 RP. On MVA, ILD (odds ratio, 5.81; 95% confidence interval, 2.28-14.83; P .01) and mean lung dose (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.71; P .01) were predictors of RP. ILD did not significantly affect OS on UVA or MVA. Median survival was 27.4 months in the ILD cohort and 34.8 in the ILD-negative cohort (P = .17).ILD is a significant risk factor for RP in patients treated with lung SBRT. Computed tomography scans should be reviewed for evidence of ILD prior to SBRT.

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the pretreatment circulating neutrophil count (CNC), circulating monocyte count (CMC), and circulating lymphocyte count (CLC) in human papillomavirus (HPV)-related (HPV+) and HPV-unrelated (HPV-) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). METHODS All p16-confirmed HPV+ and HPV- OPC cases treated with chemoradiotherapy from 2000 to 2010 were included. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared for high and low CNCs, CMCs, and CLCs (dichotomized by median values). A multivariate analysis (MVA) confirmed their prognostic value in HPV+ and HPV- tumors, respectively. RESULTS Five hundred ten HPV+ OPC cases and 192 HPV- OPC cases were included. The HPV+ cohort had lower CNC and CMC values but a CLC similar to that of the HPV- patients (P

Purpose Reported rates of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) nodal failure following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are lower than those reported in the surgical series when matched for stage. We hypothesized that this effect was due to incidental prophylactic nodal irradiation. Methods and Materials A prospectively collected group of medically inoperable early stage NSCLC patients from 2004 to 2010 was used to identify cases with nodal relapses. Controls were matched to cases, 2:1, controlling for tumor volume (ie, same or greater) and tumor location (ie, same lobe). Reference (normalized to equivalent dose for 2-Gy fractions [EQD2]) point doses at the ipsilateral hilum and carina, demographic data, and clinical outcomes were extracted from the medical records. Univariate conditional logistical regression analyses were performed with variables of interest. Results Cases and controls were well matched except for size. The controls, as expected, had larger gross tumor volumes ( P =.02). The mean ipsilateral hilar doses were 9.6 Gy and 22.4 Gy for cases and controls, respectively ( P =.014). The mean carinal doses were 7.0 Gy and 9.2 Gy, respectively ( P =.13). Mediastinal nodal relapses, with and without ipsilateral hilar relapse, were associated with mean ipsilateral hilar doses of 3.6 Gy and 19.8 Gy, respectively ( P =.01). The conditional density plot appears to demonstrate an inverse dose-effect relationship between ipsilateral hilar normalized total dose and risk of ipsilateral hilar relapse. Conclusions Incidental hilar dose greater than 20 Gy is significantly associated with fewer ipsilateral hilar relapses in inoperable early stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT.

Introduction: There are limited treatment options for patients with prior pneumonectomy and a new lung malignancy. The safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in this subpopulation has not been well defined. Methods: Postpneumonectomy patients treated with lung SBRT were identified from a prospective single institution database. Treatment toxicity was recorded prospectively using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Disease recurrences were categorized as local, regional, or distant metastatic disease. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 406 patients, 13 postpneumonectomy patients were identified and 14 tumors were treated with SBRT. Median age was 69 years. Three lesions were biopsy confirmed. The SBRT doses were 60 Gy/3 ( n = 1), 54 Gy/3 ( n = 1), 48 Gy/4 ( n = 7), 60 Gy/8 ( n = 2), and 50 Gy/10 ( n = 3). Median follow-up was 24 months. Two patients had grade 3 radiation pneumonitis 3 and 4 months post-SBRT; they died 3 and 1 months later, respectively, one of myocardial infarction and the other of progressive dyspnea thought to be related to congestive heart failure. There were no local failures, one regional failure, and three distant failures. Median survival was 29 months, 1 and 2 year overall survival were 69% (95% confidence interval: 48–100%) and 61% (95% confidence interval: 39–95%), respectively. Conclusions: SBRT in patients with prior pneumonectomy poses challenges because of limited lung reserve. However, local control and long-term survival can be achieved using SBRT in this inoperable population. Careful consideration must be given to radiation planning to minimize the risk of radiation pneumonitis.

Background The purpose of this study was to discuss if the adoption of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has improved the outcome. Methods We compared 3-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy (RT) and IMRT in all patients with hypopharyngeal SCC treated with curative intent RT or chemoradiation therapy (CRT) from January 1, 2000, to February 28, 2010. Locoregional control, overall survival (OS), distant relapse rate, larynx preservation rate, and enteral feeding tube duration were analyzed. Results Of 181 consecutive patients, 90 received 3D-RT and 91 received IMRT. At 3 years, the IMRT group had higher locoregional control compared with the 3D-RT group (75% vs 58%; p = .003), but similar OS (50% vs 52%; p = .99), distant relapse rate (23% vs 20%; p = .79), and larynx-preservation rate (90% vs 86%; p = .16). The 2-year enteral feeding tube dependency rate was similar in both groups (19% vs 18%; p = .12). Conclusion Patients with hypopharyngeal SCC treated with IMRT showed a higher locoregional control compared with 3D-RT. However, distant-relapse rate and OS remain comparable between treatment techniques. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 37: 655–661, 2015

Summary Head-and-neck small cell carcinoma (HN-SmCC) is a rare entity and there is limited data to support management decisions. The role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) remains controversial. A retrospective review of 21 consecutive HN-SmCCs was performed. No case received PCI. The 2-year overall survival, local, regional and distant control rates were 65%, 94%, 88%, and 76% respectively. Despite no patient receiving PCI, brain metastases were uncommon ( n = 2) and routine use of PCI is not justified in this population.

Introduction: We developed an innovative approach for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) with a short accelerated course of high-dose hemithoracic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). This phase I/II study assessed the feasibility of Surgery for Mesothelioma After Radiation Therapy (SMART). Methods: All resectable clinical T1-3N0M0 histologically proven, previously untreated MPMs were eligible. Patients received 25 Gy in five daily fractions during 1 week to the entire ipsilateral hemithorax with concomitant 5 Gy boost to areas at risk followed by EPP within 1 week of completing neoadjuvant IMRT. Adjuvant chemotherapy was offered to ypN2 patients on final pathologic findings. The primary end point was treatment-related mortality and secondary end points were overall survival, disease-free survival, treatment-related morbidity, and patterns of failure. Results: Targeted accrual of 25 patients was completed between November 2008 and October 2012. All patients completed SMART. IMRT was well tolerated with no grade 3+ toxicities. EPP was performed 6 ± 2 days after completing IMRT without any perioperative mortality. Thirteen patients developed grade 3+ surgical complications. One patient (4%) died from treatment-related toxicity (empyema) during follow-up. All but one patient had stage III or IV disease on final pathologic findings. Five of 13 ypN2 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 23 months (range, 6–51), the cumulative 3-year survival reached 84% in epithelial subtypes compared with 13% in biphasic subtypes ( p = 0.0002). Conclusions: SMART is feasible in resectable MPM patients. This innovative protocol presents encouraging results and supports future studies looking at long-term outcome in patients with epithelial subtypes.

Comprehensive and accurate assessment of symptoms experienced by patients undergoing lung radiotherapy (RT) is challenging. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and utility of collecting acute toxicity information by using a patient-reported instrument, the Thoracic Symptom Self-Assessment Tool (TSSAT).The TSSAT is based on the CTCAE v3.0(Common Toxicity Criteria of Adverse Events). All patients undergoing lung RT at our center from May 2008 to April 2009 were asked to complete the TSSAT on day 1 and weekly during RT. TSSAT scores were compared with clinician reporting of the same symptoms. Descriptive statistics and weighted kappa values were calculated to measure the agreement between patient- and clinician-reported acute toxicity.Of 300 consecutive patients approached, 49% (148/300) completed the TSSAT at least once. Patient participation and compliance were associated with treatment intent; radical (87%) vs. palliative (25%); P =.0001. The average data completion rate by patients was 72%, and the average toxicity documentation rate by clinicians was 67%. Agreement between patients and clinicians was fair to moderate for most symptoms; the majority (79%) of the differences were within one grade. Patients reported greater severity than clinicians for subjective symptoms. Clinicians graded greater severity than patients for the more observable symptoms.The TSSAT has been shown to be feasible and accepted by patients receiving radical dose RT. Patient-reported assessments may improve acute symptom management in the future.

summary Objectives: To review outcomes and analyze the patterns of locoregional recurrence of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) treated with surgery and postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Materials and methods: All patients with Stage I-IVB OCSCC treated with surgery and postoperative IMRT ± concurrent chemotherapy between 2005 and 2010 were evaluated. Patient survival and tumor outcomes were prospectively recorded. Outcome measures were 2 year overall survival (OS), local control (LC), regional control (RC) and distant control (DC). Locoregional recurrences were spatially localized in relation to dosimetric plans. Results: A total of 180 consecutive patients with median follow-up of 34 months were identified. Disease subsites were oral tongue (46%), floor of mouth (23%), alveolus and hard palate (12%), buccal (9%), retromolar trigone (5%), and lip (4%). The 2 year rates of OS, LC, RC, locoregional control (LRC), and DC were 65%, 87%, 83%, 78% and 83%, respectively. The 2-year estimated rates of LRC for larger subsites were: oral tongue (72%), floor of mouth (84%). Of the 180 patients, 38 (21%) had locoregional failure (LRF). Most LRFs were in-field (26, 68%) with 7 marginal and 5 out-of-field. Marginal/out-of-field failures occurred in the contralateral neck in N2b patients, at high level II/skull base, and in intentionally spared regions (near parotid) of pathologically involved necks. Conclusions: Nearly a third (12/38) of LR recurrences were marginal or out-of-field following postoperative IMRT for OCSCC. Postoperative IMRT following gross total surgical resection requires careful and comprehensive target volume delineation, and larger volumes may be needed than the primary RT setting.

We have developed a method to register and display 3D parametric data, in particular radiation dose, on two-dimensional endoscopic images. This registration of radiation dose to endoscopic or optical imaging may be valuable in assessment of normal tissue response to radiation, and visualization of radiated tissues in patients receiving post-radiation surgery. Electromagnetic sensors embedded in a flexible endoscope were used to track the position and orientation of the endoscope allowing registration of 2D endoscopic images to CT volumetric images and radiation doses planned with respect to these images. A surface was rendered from the CT image based on the air/tissue threshold, creating a virtual endoscopic view analogous to the real endoscopic view. Radiation dose at the surface or at known depth below the surface was assigned to each segment of the virtual surface. Dose could be displayed as either a colorwash on this surface or surface isodose lines. By assigning transparency levels to each surface segment based on dose or isoline location, the virtual dose display was overlaid onto the real endoscope image. Spatial accuracy of the dose display was tested using a cylindrical phantom with a treatment plan created for the phantom that matched dose levels with grid lines on the phantom surface. The accuracy of the dose display in these phantoms was 0.8-0.99 mm. To demonstrate clinical feasibility of this approach, the dose display was also tested on clinical data of a patient with laryngeal cancer treated with radiation therapy, with estimated display accuracy of ∼2-3 mm. The utility of the dose display for registration of radiation dose information to the surgical field was further demonstrated in a mock sarcoma case using a leg phantom. With direct overlay of radiation dose on endoscopic imaging, tissue toxicities and tumor response in endoluminal organs can be directly correlated with the actual tissue dose, offering a more nuanced assessment of normal tissue toxicities following radiation therapy and accurate registration of radiation dose to the surgical field.

Breast cancer is managed by a multidisciplinary team with a goal for the timely provision of high quality care. Given radiation oncologist (RO) time constraints, an opportunity arises for task delegation of breast seroma target delineation to an advanced practice clinical specialist radiation therapist (CSRT) with clinical and technical expertise to facilitate treatment planning. To explore this further, we quantitatively evaluated the variability in post-surgical seroma delineation between the CSRT and ROs.Specialized site specific training was provided to the CSRT, who, with 7 ROs, independently contoured the seroma and graded its clarity, using the cavity visualization score (CVS), for 20 patients with clinical stage Tis-2N0 breast tumors. The conformity indices were analyzed for all possible pairs of delineations. The estimated "true" seroma contour was derived from the RO contours using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation algorithm. Generalized kappa coefficient and center of mass metrics were used to examine the performance level of the CSRT in seroma delineations.The CVS of the CSRT correlated well with the mean RO-group CVS, (Spearman ρ = 0.87, P.05). The mean seroma conformity index for the RO group was 0.61 and 0.65 for the CSRT; a strong correlation was observed between the RO and CSRT conformity indices (Spearman ρ = 0.95, P.05). Almost perfect agreement levels were observed between the CSRT contours and the STAPLE RO consensus contours, with an overall kappa statistic of 0.81 (P.0001). The average center of mass shift between the CSRT and RO consensus contour was 1.69 ± 1.13 mm.Following specialized education and training, the CSRT delineated seroma targets clinically comparable with those of the radiation oncologists in women with early breast tumors suitable for accelerated partial breast or whole breast radiotherapy following lumpectomy. This study provides support for potential task delegation of breast seroma delineation to the CSRT in our current multidisciplinary environment. Further study is needed to assess the impact of this role expansion on radiotherapy system efficiency.

Purpose To report 3-year toxicity, cosmesis, and efficacy of a multicenter study of external beam, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for early-stage breast cancer. Methods and Materials Between March 2005 and August 2006, 127 women aged ≥40 years with ductal carcinoma in situ or node-negative invasive breast cancer ≤3 cm in diameter, treated with breast-conserving surgery achieving negative margins, were accrued to a prospective study involving five Canadian cancer centers. Women meeting predefined dose constraints were treated with APBI using 3 to 5 photon beams, delivering 35 to 38.5 Gy in 10 fractions, twice a day, over 1 week. Patients were assessed for treatment-related toxicities, cosmesis, and efficacy before APBI and at specified time points for as long as 3 years after APBI. Results 104 women had planning computed tomography scans showing visible seromas, met dosimetric constraints, and were treated with APBI to doses of 35 Gy ( n = 9), 36 Gy ( n = 33), or 38.5 Gy ( n = 62). Eighty-seven patients were evaluated with minimum 3-year follow-up after APBI. Radiation dermatitis, breast edema, breast induration, and fatigue decreased from baseline levels or stabilized by the 3-year follow-up. Hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, breast pain, and telangiectasia slightly increased from baseline levels. Most toxicities at 3 years were Grade 1. Only 1 patient had a Grade 3 toxicity with telangiectasia in a skin fold inside the 95% isodose. Cosmesis was good to excellent in 86% (89/104) of women at baseline and 82% (70/85) at 3 years. The 3-year disease-free survival was 97%, with only one local recurrence that occurred in a different quadrant away from the treated site and two distant recurrences. Conclusions At 3 years, toxicity and cosmesis were acceptable, and local control and disease-free survival were excellent, supporting continued accrual to randomized APBI trials.

Purpose In malignant mesothelioma (MM), radiologic assessment of disease status is difficult. Both soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) and osteopontin (OP) have utility in distinguishing MM from benign pleural disease. We evaluated whether SMRP and OP also correlated with the disease course of MM. Patients and Methods Serial plasma samples from patients with MM were prospectively collected, and SMRP and OP levels were measured. Radiologic tests across time periods showing disease progression, stability, or shrinkage were compared with corresponding changes in SMRP/OP levels. Results From 41 patients, 165 samples were collected (range, 2 to 10; median 4). At study entry, 37 of 41 patients had measurable disease, of whom 92% (34 of 37) had elevated baseline SMRP levels; four of 41 patients had no evidence of recurrence and each had normal baseline SMRP levels. In 21 patients receiving systemic therapy, percentage change in SMRP more than 10% correlated with the radiologic assessment by a trained thoracic radiologist (P < .001), by formal Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; P = .008), or by modified RECIST (P < .001). All seven patients who underwent surgical resection with negative margins had elevated preoperative SMRP levels that fell to normal postoperatively. Rising SMRP was observed in all patients with radiologic disease progression. No associations were found with OP. Conclusion Percentage changes in SMRP levels, but not changes in OP levels, are a potentially useful marker of disease course. These findings should be validated prospectively for a role as an objective adjunctive measure of disease course in both clinical trials and clinical practice.

Purpose Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains associated with poor outcome. We examined the results of trimodality therapy with cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and adjuvant high-dose (50 to 60 Gy) hemithoracic radiation therapy for MPM. Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all patients prospectively evaluated for trimodality therapy protocol between January 2001 and December 2007 in our institution. Results A total of 60 patients were suitable candidates. Histology was epithelioid (n = 44) or biphasic (n = 16). Chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin/vinorelbine (n = 26), cisplatin/pemetrexed (n = 24), cisplatin/raltitrexed (n = 6), or cisplatin/gemcitabine (n = 4). EPP was performed in 45 patients, and hemithoracic radiation therapy to at least 50 Gy was administered postoperatively to 30 patients. Completion of the trimodality therapy in the absence of mediastinal node involvement was associated with the best survival (median survival of 59 months v ≤ 14 months in the remaining patients, P = .0003). The type of induction chemotherapy had no significant impact on survival. Pathologic nodal status remained a significant predictor of poor survival despite completion of the trimodality therapy. After completion of the protocol, the 5-year disease-free survival was 53% for patients with N0 disease, reaching 75% in patients with ypT1-2N0 and 45% in patients with ypT3-4N0. Conclusion This large, single-center experience with induction chemotherapy followed by EPP and adjuvant high-dose hemithoracic radiation for MPM shows that half of the patients are able to complete this protocol. The results are encouraging for patients with N0 disease. However, N2 disease remains a major factor impacting on survival, despite completion of the entire trimodality regimen.

OBJECT The authors performed a pattern-of-failure analysis, with a focus on epidural disease progression, in patients treated with postoperative spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS Of the 70 patients with 75 spinal metastases (cases) treated with postoperative spine SBRT, there were 26 cases of local disease recurrence and 25 cases with a component of epidural disease progression. Twenty-four of the 25 cases had preoperative epidural disease with subsequent epidural disease progression, and this cohort was the focus of this epidural-specific pattern-of-failure investigation. Preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up MRI scans were reviewed, and epidural disease was characterized based on location according to a system in which the vertebral anatomy is divided into 6 sectors, with the anterior compartment comprising Sectors 1, 2, and 6, and the posterior compartment comprising Sectors 3, 4, and 5. RESULTS Patterns of epidural progression are reported specifically for the 24 cases with preoperative epidural disease and subsequent epidural progression. Epidural disease progression within the posterior compartment was observed to be significantly lower in those with preoperative epidural disease confined to the anterior compartment than in those with preoperative epidural disease involving both anterior and posterior compartments (56% vs 93%, respectively; p = 0.047). In a high proportion of patients with epidural disease progression, treatment failure was found in the anterior compartment, including both those with preoperative epidural disease confined to the anterior compartment and those with preoperative epidural disease involving both anterior and posterior compartments (100% vs. 73%, respectively). When epidural disease was confined to the anterior compartment on the preoperative and postoperative MRIs, no epidural disease progression was observed in Sector 4, which is the most posterior sector. Postoperative epidural disease characteristics alone were not predictive of the pattern of epidural treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS Reviewing the extent of epidural disease on preoperative MRI is imperative when planning postoperative SBRT. When epidural disease is confined to the anterior epidural sectors pre- and postoperatively, covering the entire epidural space circumferentially with a prophylactic “donut” distribution may not be needed.

Background and purpose Target volumes for moving lung tumours encompass the full range of respiratory motion, increasing the risk of lung complications. Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) allows for more precise dose distributions. Distributions corresponding to the probability density function (PDF) of tumour motion may better spare lung yet deliver adequate target dose. The planning study purpose is to compare and evaluate different dose distributions on a moving lung tumour: (A) conformal RT (CRT) encompassing the full range of tumour motion, (B) CRT encompassing the modal tumour position only, and (C) an IMRT technique where the dose delivered corresponds to the tumour PDF. Materials and methods A 5cm diameter spherical target within a rectangular lung equivalent phantom was treated using a parallel-opposed pair technique with a 1.5cm margin around the tumour (in the beam's eye view). Asymmetrical sinusoidal (superior–inferior) target movement (peak-trough=3cm) was simulated for different dose distributions (prescription dose=60Gy). Equivalent uniform dose (EUD) for the tumour and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) for radiation pneumonitis were evaluated. Results The EUDs were 60.0, 48.5, and 57.9Gy while the NTCPs were 5, 1, and 3% for cases A, B, and C, respectively (assuming survival fraction, SF 2 Gy =0.5). Conclusions Since these results rely on unvalidated radiobiologic models, they must be interpreted cautiously. However, more optimized dose distributions for moving lung targets appear feasible and can reduce lung complications with only a negligible impact on the expected EUD and, thus, deserve further study.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) continues to be one of the most difficult malignancies to diagnose and treat. Despite many attempts to improve the prognosis, the disease remains almost uniformly fatal with little hope for long-term survival. Many studies of radiation and surgery, either alone or combined, have been performed, but the results of treatment remain poor and most patients recur either locally or distally. In an effort to prolong survival and improve the prognosis of MPM, the Surgery for Mesothelioma After Radiation Therapy (SMART) trial was developed. Based on the idea that local control, and potentially overall survival, could be improved with high-dose radiation followed by aggressive surgery, this protocol involves a total of 25 Gy of radiation delivered in 5 daily fractions over one week to the entire ipsilateral hemithorax by intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with a concomitant boost of 5 Gy to volumes at high risk based on computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) scan findings. Within two weeks of completion of the radiation therapy, extra-pleural pneumonectomy (EPP) is performed. The interim results of this study have shown encouraging outcomes for select patients with MPM.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare, aggressive tumour involving the pleura commonly associated with prior asbestos exposure. At present, there is still ongoing debate and controversy regarding its optimal management. In particular, there is no agreed upon consensus as to the most appropriate surgical procedure in this disease with various camps championing extra-pleural pneumonectomy (EPP) on one side and extensive pleurectomy-decortication (EPD) on the other.

Purpose To assess motion of the spinal cord and cauda equina, which are critical neural tissues (CNT), which is important when evaluating the planning organ-at-risk margin required for stereotactic body radiation therapy. Methods and Materials We analyzed CNT motion in 65 patients with spinal metastases (11 cervical, 39 thoracic, and 24 lumbar spinal segments) in the supine position using dynamic axial and sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI, 3T Verio, Siemens) over a 137-second interval. Motion was segregated according to physiologic cardiorespiratory oscillatory motion (characterized by the average root mean square deviation) and random bulk shifts associated with gross patient motion (characterized by the range). Displacement was evaluated in the anteroposterior (AP), lateral (LR), and superior-inferior (SI) directions by use of a correlation coefficient template matching algorithm, with quantification of random motion measure error over 3 separate trials. Statistical significance was defined according to P Results In the AP, LR, and SI directions, significant oscillatory motion was observed in 39.2%, 35.1%, and 10.8% of spinal segments, respectively, and significant bulk motions in all cases. The median oscillatory CNT motions in the AP, LR, and SI directions were 0.16 mm, 0.17 mm, and 0.44 mm, respectively, and the maximal statistically significant oscillatory motions were 0.39 mm, 0.41 mm, and 0.77 mm, respectively. The median bulk displacements in the AP, LR, and SI directions were 0.51 mm, 0.59 mm, and 0.66 mm, and the maximal statistically significant displacements were 2.21 mm, 2.87 mm, and 3.90 mm, respectively. In the AP, LR, and SI directions, bulk displacements were greater than 1.5 mm in 5.4%, 9.0%, and 14.9% of spinal segments, respectively. No significant differences in axial motion were observed according to cord level or cauda equina. Conclusions Oscillatory CNT motion was observed to be relatively minor. Our results support the importance of controlling bulk patient motion and the practice of applying a planning organ-at-risk margin.

To compare the temporal lymph node (LN) regression and regional control (RC) after primary chemoradiation therapy/radiation therapy in human papillomavirus-related [HPV(+)] versus human papillomavirus-unrelated [HPV(-)] head-and-neck cancer (HNC).All cases of N2-N3 HNC treated with radiation therapy/chemoradiation therapy between 2003 and 2009 were reviewed. Human papillomavirus status was ascertained by p16 staining on all available oropharyngeal cancers. Larynx/hypopharynx cancers were considered HPV(-). Initial radiologic complete nodal response (CR) (≤1.0 cm 8-12 weeks after treatment), ultimate LN resolution, and RC were compared between HPV(+) and HPV(-) HNC. Multivariate analysis identified outcome predictors.A total of 257 HPV(+) and 236 HPV(-) HNCs were identified. The initial LN size was larger (mean, 2.9 cm vs 2.5 cm; P.01) with a higher proportion of cystic LNs (38% vs 6%, P.01) in HPV(+) versus HPV(-) HNC. CR was achieved is 125 HPV(+) HNCs (49%) and 129 HPV(-) HNCs (55%) (P=.18). The mean post treatment largest LN was 36% of the original size in the HPV(+) group and 41% in the HPV(-) group (P.01). The actuarial LN resolution was similar in the HPV(+) and HPV(-) groups at 12 weeks (42% and 43%, respectively), but it was higher in the HPV(+) group than in the HPV(-) group at 36 weeks (90% vs 77%, P.01). The median follow-up period was 3.6 years. The 3-year RC rate was higher in the HPV(-) CR cases versus non-CR cases (92% vs 63%, P.01) but was not different in the HPV(+) CR cases versus non-CR cases (98% vs 92%, P=.14). On multivariate analysis, HPV(+) status predicted ultimate LN resolution (odds ratio, 1.4 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.7]; P.01) and RC (hazard ratio, 0.3 [95% confidence interval 0.2-0.6]; P.01).HPV(+) LNs involute more quickly than HPV(-) LNs but undergo a more prolonged process to eventual CR beyond the time of initial assessment at 8 to 12 weeks after treatment. Post radiation neck dissection is advisable for all non-CR HPV(-)/non-CR N3 HPV(+) cases, but it may be avoided for selected non-CR N2 HPV(+) cases with a significant LN involution if they can undergo continued imaging surveillance. The role of positron emission tomography for response assessment should be investigated.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) offers excellent control rates. Most published series deal mainly with small (usually4 cm), peripheral, solitary tumors. Larger tumors are associated with poorer outcomes (ie, lower control rates, higher toxicity) when treated with conventional RT. It is unclear whether SBRT is sufficiently potent to control these larger tumors. We therefore evaluated and examined the influence of tumor size on treatment outcomes after SBRT.Between October 2004 and October 2010, 185 medically inoperable patients with early (T1-T2N0M0) NSCLC were treated on a prospective research ethics board-approved single-institution protocol. Prescription doses were risk-adapted based on tumor size and location. Follow-up included prospective assessment of toxicity (as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0) and serial computed tomography scans. Patterns of failure, toxicity, and survival outcomes were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method, and the significance of tumor size (diameter, volume) with respect to patient, treatment, and tumor factors was tested.Median follow-up was 15.2 months. Tumor size was not associated with local failure but was associated with regional failure (P=.011) and distant failure (P=.021). Poorer overall survival (P=.001), disease-free survival (P=.001), and cause-specific survival (P=.005) were also significantly associated with tumor size (with tumor volume more significant than diameter). Gross tumor volume and planning target volume were significantly associated with grade 2 or worse radiation pneumonitis. However, overall rates of grade ≥3 pneumonitis were low and not significantly affected by tumor or target size.Currently employed stereotactic body radiation therapy dose regimens can provide safe effective local therapy even for larger solitary NSCLC tumors (up to 5.7 cm in tumor diameter or 100 cm(3) in tumor volume) but are associated with more nonlocal failures as well as poorer survival. These observations suggest these patients may benefit from more extensive staging or consideration of adjuvant therapy.

Summary Objectives To describe the natural course of distant metastases (DMs) following radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in HPV(+) oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC). Methods OPC treated with RT/CRT from 1/1/2000 to 5/31/2010 were reviewed. The natural course of DM were compared between HPV(+) and HPV(−) cohorts. Results Median follow-up was 3.9 years. The DM rate were similar (11% vs. 15% at 3-years, p = 0.25) between the HPV(+) (n = 457) vs. the HPV(−) (n = 167) cases. While almost all (24/25) HPV(−) DM occurred within 2-years following RT (1 was at 2.1 years), 7/54 (13%) of HPV(+) DM were detected beyond 3 years (up to 5.3 years). Disseminating to >2 organs occurred in 18 (33%) HPV(+) vs. none in HPV(−). Post-DM survival rates were 11% vs. 4% at 2-years (p = 0.02) for the HPV(+) vs. HPV(−) cases respectively. 5/6 HPV(+) with lung oligo-metastasis were still alive with stable disease beyond 2-years after salvage procedures for DM (chemotherapy: 3; surgical resection: 2; radiotherapy: 1). Conclusions Although DM rates are similar, the natural course of HPV(+) DM differs from that of HPV(−) patients: it may occur after a longer interval, often with a “disseminating” phenotype, and a small number may have prolonged survival after salvage for DM.

To report outcome of HPV-related [HPV(+)] oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) managed predominantly by altered-fractionation radiotherapy-alone (RT-alone).OPCs treated with RT-alone (n = 207) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (n = 151) from 2001 to 2008 were included. Overall survival (OS), local (LC), regional (RC) and distant (DC) control were compared for HPV(+) vs. HPV-unrelated [HPV(-)], by RT-alone vs. CRT, and by smoking pack-years (≤ 10 vs.10). Multivariate analysis identified predictors.HPV(+) (n = 277) had better OS (81% vs. 44%), LC (93% vs. 76%), RC (94% vs. 79%) (all p0.01) but similar DC (89% vs. 86%, p = 0.87) vs. HPV(-) (n = 81). HPV(+) stage IV CRT (n = 125) had better OS (89% vs. 70%, p0.01), but similar LC (93% vs. 90%, p = 0.41), RC (94% vs. 90%, p = 0.31) and DC (90% vs. 83%, p = 0.22) vs. RT-alone (n = 96). Both HPV(+) RT-alone (n = 37) and CRT (n = 67) stage IV minimal smokers had favorable OS (86% vs. 88%, p = 0.45), LC (95% vs. 92%, p = 0.52), RC (97% vs. 93%, p = 0.22), and DC (92% vs. 86%, p = 0.37). RT-alone and heavy-smoking were independent predictors for lower OS but not CSS in multivariate analysis.Overall, HPV(+) RT-alone stage IV demonstrated lower survival but comparable disease control vs. CRT, but no difference was apparent among minimal smokers.

Background Breast cancer sensitivity to large fraction size may be enhanced using hypofractionated concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT), thereby shortening overall treatment time. This ethics approved, prospective single cohort feasibility study was designed to evaluate the dosimetry and toxicity of CBRT using an intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique, compared with a standard sequential boost technique (SBT). Methods Fifteen women (11 right-sided; 4 left-sided) received 42.4Gy to the whole breast and an additional 10.08Gy to the tumor bed in 16 daily fractions, using IMRT and standard dose constraints. Each patient was replanned with the SBT, using mixed photon–electrons. Clinical target volume (CTV), dose evaluation volume (DEV), and organs at risk (OAR) dose distributions were compared with the SBT. Toxicity and treatment times were prospectively recorded. Results All 15 CBRT plans achieved the desired CTV ( V 49.9Gy ⩾99%) and DEV ( V 49.9Gy ⩾95%), coverage of the boost, compared with only 10 (66.7%, p =0.03), and 12 (80%, p =0.125) SBT plans, respectively. Ipsilateral lung ( p p =0.001; left-sided, p =0.13) doses were lower. Grade 3 acute toxicity occurred in 1 (6.7%) patient. At 1year, two (13.3%) additional patients had overall grade 2 late toxicity, compared with baseline. No grade 3–4 late toxicity was observed. Conclusions CBRT using IMRT improved boost coverage and lowered OAR doses, compared with SBT. Toxicities were acceptable using a daily boost of 3.28Gy. While resource utilization was greater, overall treatment time was reduced.

New imaging technologies have advanced our ability to treat lung cancers through enhanced and extended visualization of the tumor as well as patient and treatment response. Image guidance can reduce uncertainty by increasing precision and accuracy through improved patient selection, target delineation, and improved knowledge of nodal involvement. Conformal imaging-based radiotherapy (RT) can allow dose escalation. In the future, imaging may allow adaptive RT to be exploited in selected patients, especially those with large geometric changes occurring during RT. Furthermore, functional imaging, although in its infancy, has the potential to significantly improve RT, from RT planning and delivery to outcome assessment.

To assess intrafractional geometric accuracy of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) patients treated with volumetric image guidance.Treatment setup accuracy was analyzed in 133 SBRT patients treated via research ethics board-approved protocols. For each fraction, a localization cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was acquired for soft-tissue registration to the internal target volume, followed by a couch adjustment for positional discrepancies greater than 3 mm, verified with a second CBCT scan. CBCT scans were also performed at intrafraction and end fraction. Patient positioning data from 2047 CBCT scans were recorded to determine systematic (Σ) and random (σ) uncertainties, as well as planning target volume margins. Data were further stratified and analyzed by immobilization method (evacuated cushion [n=75], evacuated cushion plus abdominal compression [n=33], or chest board [n=25]) and by patients' Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS): 0 (n=31), 1 (n=70), or 2 (n=32).Using CBCT internal target volume was matched within ±3 mm in 16% of all fractions at localization, 89% at verification, 72% during treatment, and 69% after treatment. Planning target volume margins required to encompass residual setup errors after couch corrections (verification CBCT scans) were 4 mm, and they increased to 5 mm with target intrafraction motion (post-treatment CBCT scans). Small differences (1 mm) in the cranial-caudal direction of target position were observed between the immobilization cohorts in the localization, verification, intrafraction, and post-treatment CBCT scans (p0.01). Positional drift varied according to patient PS, with the PS 1 and 2 cohorts drifting out of position by mid treatment more than the PS 0 cohort in the cranial-caudal direction (p=0.04).Image guidance ensures high geometric accuracy for lung SBRT irrespective of immobilization method or PS. A 5-mm setup margin suffices to address intrafraction motion. This setup margin may be further reduced by strategies such as frequent image guidance or volumetric arc therapy to correct or limit intrafraction motion.

7526 Background: We developed a protocol with accelerated hypofractionated hemithoracic IMRT followed by EPP for MPM. Advantages include optimal delivery of radiation to the whole tumor bed in a short period limiting the risk of viable tumor cell spread during surgery. Methods: Patients with resectable clinical T1-3N0M0 histology proven MPM were eligible for the study. 25 Gy in 5 daily fractions over 1 week was delivered to the entire ipsilateral hemithorax by IMRT with concomitant boost of 5 Gy to volumes at high risk based on CT and PET scan findings. EPP was performed one week after the end of radiation. Adjuvant chemotherapy was offered to patients with ypN2 on final pathology. The primary end-point was treatment related mortality. Secondary endpoint included overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS). Initial sites of recurrence were also recorded. Results: Twenty five patients were accrued between 11/2008 and 10/2012. Patients had a median age of 64 years (range, 45-75), 76% were males, 64% had epithelioid histology. All patients completed IMRT and EPP. IMRT was well tolerated with no grade 3-5 toxicity. EPP was performed 6±2 days after completion of IMRT. Surgical complications occurred in 18 patients. One patient died from empyema at 88 days. All but one patient (stage IB) had stage III (n=11) or IV (n=13) disease on final pathology. Five out of 13 patients with ypN2 disease underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 3-51), the estimated 3-year survival reached 62%. Survival was significantly better in epithelioid compared to biphasic pathologic subtypes (83% survival at 3 years vs 19%, respectively; p=0.004). 14 patients remain disease free after a median follow-up of 17 months (range, 3-37). 2-year DFS was 85% in stage III and 37% in stage IV disease (p=0.03). Recurrences occurred in the ipsilateral chest only (n=2), ipsilateral chest and distant sites (n=2), and distant sites only (n=6). Conclusions: Accelerated hypofractionated hemithoracic IMRT followed by EPP is feasible. This treatment could improve survival in selected patients with epithelial subtype. Clinical trial information: NCT00797719.

Background:Treatment of elderly patients with stage III NSCLC is controversial. Limited data exist, as the elderly are underrepresented in clinical trials.Methods:After ethics approval, we performed a retrospective review of 1372 stage III NSCLC patients treated at our institution during the period 1997–2007. Patients with malignant effusions and microscopic N2 discovered only postoperatively were excluded, leaving 740 who were classified by treatment plan: palliative (palliative chemotherapy or radiation [≤40 Gy]); nonsurgical multimodality (>40 Gy radiation ± chemotherapy); or surgical multimodality (chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery). Demographics, treatment, toxicity, and survival were analyzed by age, 0 to 65 years, n = 384; 66 to 75 years, n = 256; 76+ years, n = 100, and compared using log-rank, univariate, and multivariate statistical tests.Results:Patients older than 65 years were more likely to have poor performance status (p < 0.0001), multiple comorbidities (p < 0.0001), and to receive palliative therapy only (p < 0.0001). Older and younger patients treated with curative intent with nonsurgical bimodality therapy or trimodality therapy including surgery had similar rates of grade 3/4 toxicity (0–65 years, 39%; 66–75 years, 43%; 76+ years, 5%; p = 0.18) and toxic death (0–65 years, 4%; 66–75 years, 4%; 76+ years, 0%; p = 0.76). Survival was worse with increasing age (p < 0.0001), likely due to greater use of palliative treatment in the elderly. When survival was analyzed for patients treated with curative intent, there was no difference between age groups for nonsurgical (p = 0.32) or surgical (p = 0.53) therapy.Conclusion:In select fit elderly patients, combined modality therapy is tolerable and is associated with survival similar to that of younger patients.