1. Prospective Comparison of FDG and FET PET/CT in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Author
-
Dany Grahek, Jean-Noël Talbot, P. El Chater, J. Lacau St Guily, Sona Balogova, B. Susini, Khaldoun Kerrou, Françoise Montravers, Sophie Périé, and B. Angelard
- Subjects
Male ,Fluorine Radioisotopes ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ,Statistical significance ,medicine ,Carcinoma ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,Aged ,PET-CT ,business.industry ,Head and neck cancer ,Cancer ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma ,Radiation therapy ,Oncology ,Head and Neck Neoplasms ,Lymphatic Metastasis ,Positron-Emission Tomography ,Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ,Tyrosine ,Female ,Radiology ,Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ,Radiopharmaceuticals ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,business - Abstract
The clinical usefulness of 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is now well-documented. However, its sensitivity is greater than its specificity due to false-positive results in inflammatory or infectious lesions, which are frequent in this area, in particular after treatment by surgery and/or radiotherapy. O-2-fluoro-(18F)-ethyl-L-thyrosine (FET) has been reported not to be taken up by such lesions, and a preliminary study indicated that this may be clinically useful in HNSCC. We performed a prospective study to compare the diagnostic performances of FDG and FET PET/CT in the different settings of HNSCC. Twenty-seven patients (20 men and seven women, aged 48–76, among 30 patients included) and 69 suspected cancer sites are now evaluable on basis of postsurgical histology and/or follow-up greater than 6 months; 15 patients were referred for initial staging and 12 during posttherapy follow-up, a recurrence being suspected in eight of them. FDG and FET PET/CT were performed on two different days, the patient fasting for 6 h, 1 h after injection of 5 MBq/kg of body mass of each radiopharmaceutical. Both PET/CT examinations were blind read more than 6 months after the end of inclusions in a random order for each tracer and with a time interval greater than 1 month between FDG and FET PET/CT blind readings. Overall diagnostic performances, derived from blind reading: FDG PET/CT on a per patient basis: sensitivity 100%, specificity 71%, accuracy 93%; FDG PET/CT on a per site basis: sensitivity 95%, specificity 63%, accuracy 83%; FET PET/CT on a per patient basis: sensitivity 70%, specificity 100%, accuracy 78%; FET PET/CT on a per site basis: sensitivity 64%, specificity 100%, accuracy 78%. At site level, sensitivity was significantly greater with FDG (p
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF