Search

Patients with preexisting metabolic disorders such as diabetes are at a higher risk of developing severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Mitochondrion, the very organelle that controls cellular metabolism, holds the key to understanding disease progression at the cellular level. Our current study aimed to understand how cellular metabolism contributes to COVID-19 outcomes. Metacore pathway enrichment analyses on differentially expressed genes (encoded by both mitochondrial and nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)) involved in cellular metabolism, regulation of mitochondrial respiration and organization, and apoptosis, was performed on RNA sequencing (RNASeq) data from blood samples collected from healthy controls and patients with mild/moderate or severe COVID-19. Genes from the enriched pathways were analyzed by network analysis to uncover interactions among them and up- or downstream genes within each pathway. Compared to the mild/moderate COVID-19, the upregulation of a myriad of growth factor and cell cycle signaling pathways, with concomitant downregulation of interferon signaling pathways, were observed in the severe group. Matrix metallopeptidase 9 ( MMP9) was found in five of the top 10 upregulated pathways, indicating its potential as therapeutic target against COVID-19. In summary, our data demonstrates aberrant activation of endocrine signaling in severe COVID-19, and its implication in immune and metabolic dysfunction.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Infected individuals display a wide spectrum of disease severity, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). One of the main factors underlying this heterogeneity is the host immune response, with severe COVID-19 often associated with a hyperinflammatory state., Aim: Our current study aimed to pinpoint the specific genes and pathways underlying differences in the disease spectrum and outcomes observed, through in-depth analyses of whole blood transcriptomics in a large cohort of COVID-19 participants., Results: All WHO severity levels were well represented and mild and severe disease displaying distinct gene expression profiles. WHO severity levels 1-4 were grouped as mild disease, and signatures from these participants were different from those with WHO severity levels 6-9 classified as severe disease. Severity level 5 (moderate cases) presented a unique transitional gene signature between severity levels 2-4 (mild/moderate) and 6-9 (severe) and hence might represent the turning point for better or worse disease outcome. Gene expression changes are very distinct when comparing mild/moderate or severe cases to healthy controls. In particular, we demonstrated the hallmark down-regulation of adaptive immune response pathways and activation of neutrophil pathways in severe compared to mild/moderate cases, as well as activation of blood coagulation pathways., Conclusions: Our data revealed discrete gene signatures associated with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 identifying valuable candidates for future biomarker discovery., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wang, Schughart, Pelaia, Chew, Kim, Karvunidis, Knippenberg, Teoh, Phu, Short, Iredell, Thevarajan, Audsley, Macdonald, Burcham, McLean, PREDICT-19 consortium, Tang and Shojaei.)

Purpose: Robust biomarkers that predict disease outcomes amongst COVID-19 patients are necessary for both patient triage and resource prioritisation. Numerous candidate biomarkers have been proposed for COVID-19. However, at present, there is no consensus on the best diagnostic approach to predict outcomes in infected patients. Moreover, it is not clear whether such tools would apply to other potentially pandemic pathogens and therefore of use as stockpile for future pandemic preparedness., Methods: We conducted a multi-cohort observational study to investigate the biology and the prognostic role of interferon alpha-inducible protein 27 ( IFI27 ) in COVID-19 patients., Results: We show that IFI27 is expressed in the respiratory tract of COVID-19 patients and elevated IFI27 expression in the lower respiratory tract is associated with the presence of a high viral load. We further demonstrate that the systemic host response, as measured by blood IFI27 expression, is associated with COVID-19 infection. For clinical outcome prediction (e.g., respiratory failure), IFI27 expression displays a high sensitivity (0.95) and specificity (0.83), outperforming other known predictors of COVID-19 outcomes. Furthermore, IFI27 is upregulated in the blood of infected patients in response to other respiratory viruses. For example, in the pandemic H1N1/09 influenza virus infection, IFI27- like genes were highly upregulated in the blood samples of severely infected patients., Conclusion: These data suggest that prognostic biomarkers targeting the family of IFI27 genes could potentially supplement conventional diagnostic tools in future virus pandemics, independent of whether such pandemics are caused by a coronavirus, an influenza virus or another as yet-to-be discovered respiratory virus., Competing Interests: FS-F-G is a consultant for Biotheus Inc. KS is a consultant for Sanofi, Roche and NovoNordisk. The opinions and data presented in this manuscript are of the authors and are independent of these relationships. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Shojaei, Shamshirian, Monkman, Grice, Tran, Tan, Teo, Rodrigues Rossi, McCulloch, Nalos, Raei, Razavi, Ghasemian, Gheibi, Roozbeh, Sly, Spann, Chew, Zhu, Xia, Wells, Senegaglia, Kuniyoshi, Franck, dos Santos, Noronha, Motamen, Valadan, Amjadi, Gogna, Madan, Alizadeh-Navaei, Lamperti, Zuñiga, Nova-Lamperti, Labarca, Knippenberg, Herwanto, Wang, Phu, Chew, Kwan, Kim, Teoh, Pelaia, Kuan, Jee, Iredell, O’Byrne, Fraser, Davis, Belz, Warkiani, Gallo, Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes, Nguyen, Mclean, Kulasinghe, Short and Tang.)

The present article evaluates the results of the treatment with adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) of patients with nonhealing, chronic wounds. In the period 2013 to 2016, 248 patients were referred from various hospitals because of chronic wounds that were recalcitrant in healing despite standard wound care as described in national and international guidelines. After inclusion, all patients were treated with HBOT and subjected to a weekly standard wound care treatment. During each HBOT session, 100% O 2 was administered for 75 minutes under increased pressure of 2.4 ATA. Wounds and quality of life were assessed before and after the total treatment period. A total of 248 patients have been evaluated. Diabetic foot ulcers were present in 134 patients, the remainder (114 patients) showed a variety of wound locations and etiologies. The number of HBOT treatments amounted to an average of 48 (range 20-68) sessions. Before referral to our clinic, 31% of all wounds had existed for at least 18 months (72 patients). After HBOT, 81% of all wounds were near complete healing or completely healed, in 13% of the cases the wound was stable, and in 2% minor or major amputation had to be carried out. The mean treatment time for wounds pre-existing fewer than 6 weeks ("early referrals") was 67 days, and 119 days for wounds pre-existing more than 18 months ("late referrals"). A majority of the patients in our study referred with nonhealing wounds clinically improved when adjuvant HBOT was added to standard wound care protocols. No differences in success rate were seen between diabetic and nondiabetic wounds. It showed that HBOT is a well-tolerated treatment., (© 2020 The Authors. Wound Repair and Regeneration published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wound Healing Society.)

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after open aortic repair is subject to multiple patient- and operation-related variables. Hostile neck morphology in open aneurysm repair is thought to contribute to this AKI risk postoperatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate if large neck atheroma is a possible risk factor in the postoperative development of AKI., Methods: Retrospectively 137 patients were evaluated for neck atheroma and AKI incidence. Atheroma load measurements were performed by 2 different techniques. Results were compared, and secondly a univariate analysis was performed for multiple additional risk factors regarding AKI occurrence., Results: Significant (>30%) neck atheroma was not associated with a higher risk for developing AKI (odds ratio [OR]: 1.81; 95% confidence intervals: 0.74-4.44). Overall incidence of AKI based upon Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria was 19.7%. In univariate analysis coronary artery disease and the presence of a renal artery stenosis were both significantly associated with AKI (OR: 2.38, 3.31, respectively) as well as the use of B-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (OR 3.05, 2.48, respectively)., Conclusions: Cross-clamping in case of significant neck atheroma during open aortic aneurysm repair is not associated with increased risk of AKI. Defining high-risk patients based on additional risk factors must be a part of preoperative patient selection., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective/background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) may be associated with renal injury and more insight is needed into potential risk factors. The aim was to identify clinical, anatomical, and peri-procedural parameters as potential risk factors for the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and to evaluate chronic kidney disease (CKD) after EVAR., Methods: A cohort of 212 consecutive patients who underwent elective EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm from January 2009 to October 2016 was included. A subgroup of 149 patients with 2 years follow-up was compared with a set of 135 non-operated aneurysm patients with smaller aneurysms (similar cardiovascular risk profile) to assess CKD. Primary outcomes were AKI (Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria) and CKD measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines). For AKI, candidate risk factors were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis; for chronic renal function decline, risk factors were identified using Cox regression analysis., Results: AKI occurred in 30 patients (15%). On multivariate analysis, the use of angiotensin II blocker (odds ratio [OR] 4.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-12.07) and peri-operative complications (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.20-8.10) were independent risk factors for AKI, whereas statin use was a protective factor (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.52). EVAR resulted in a significant increase (23.5%) in the occurrence of CKD compared with the control group (6.7%; p <.001). On univariate and multivariate Cox regression the risk factors: aortic neck diameter (per mm increase) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.25), renal artery stenosis >50% (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.05-4.79), and the occurrence of AKI (HR 2.19, 95% CI 0.99-4.85) were significant predictors of CKD., Conclusion: This study identified use of angiotensin II blockers and peri-operative complications as risk factors for AKI. In addition, the problem of renal function decline after EVAR is highlighted, which indicates that prolonged protective measures (e.g., in those patients at high risk) over time are needed to improve patient outcomes., (Copyright © 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clinical outcomes reported after treatment of infrapopliteal lesions with drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been more favorable compared with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with a bailout bare metal stent (PTA-BMS) through midterm follow-up in patients with critical limb ischemia. In the present study, long-term results of treatment of infrapopliteal lesions with DESs are presented., Methods and Results: Adults with critical limb ischemia (Rutherford category ≥4) and infrapopliteal lesions were randomized to receive PTA-BMS or DESs with paclitaxel. Long-term follow-up consisted of annual assessments up to 5 years after treatment or until a clinical end point was reached. Clinical end points were major amputation (above ankle level), infrapopliteal surgical or endovascular reintervention, and death. Preserved primary patency (≤50% restenosis) of treated lesions was an additional morphological end point, assessed by duplex sonography. In total, 74 limbs (73 patients) were treated with DESs and 66 limbs (64 patients) were treated with PTA-BMS. The estimated 5-year major amputation rate was lower in the DES arm (19.3% versus 34.0% for PTA-BMS; P =0.091). The 5-year rates of amputation- and event-free survival (survival free from major amputation or reintervention) were significantly higher in the DES arm compared with PTA-BMS (31.8% versus 20.4%, P =0.043; and 26.2% versus 15.3%, P =0.041, respectively). Survival rates were comparable. The limited available morphological results showed higher preserved patency rates after DESs than after PTA-BMS at 1, 3, and 4 years of follow-up., Conclusions: Both clinical and morphological long-term results after treatment of infrapopliteal lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia are improved with DES compared with PTA-BMS., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00471289., (© 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)

Dried blood spot (DBS) antibiotic assays can facilitate pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) studies in situations where venous blood sampling is logistically difficult. We sought to develop, validate, and apply a DBS assay for rifampin (RIF), fusidic acid (FUS), and ciprofloxacin (CIP). These antibiotics are considered active against organisms in biofilms and are therefore commonly used for the treatment of infections associated with prosthetic implants. A liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy DBS assay was developed and validated, including red cell partitioning and thermal stability for each drug and the rifampin metabolite desacetyl rifampin (Des-RIF). Plasma and DBS concentrations in 10 healthy adults were compared, and the concentration-time profiles were incorporated into population PK models. The limits of quantification for RIF, Des-RIF, CIP, and FUS in DBS were 15 μg/liter, 14 μg/liter, 25 μg/liter, and 153 μg/liter, respectively. Adjusting for hematocrit, red cell partitioning, and relative recovery, DBS-predicted plasma concentrations were comparable to measured plasma concentrations for each antibiotic (r > 0.95; P < 0.0001), and Bland-Altman plots showed no significant bias. The final population PK estimates of clearance, volume of distribution, and time above threshold MICs for measured and DBS-predicted plasma concentrations were comparable. These drugs were stable in DBSs for at least 10 days at room temperature and 1 month at 4°C. The present DBS antibiotic assays are robust and can be used as surrogates for plasma concentrations to provide valid PK and PK/PD data in a variety of clinical situations, including therapeutic drug monitoring or studies of implant infections., (Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

Background: Endovascular infrapopliteal treatment of patients with critical limb ischemia using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bail-out bare metal stenting (BMS) is hampered by restenosis. In interventional cardiology, drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown better patency rates and are standard practice nowadays. An investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized trial was conducted to assess whether DES also improve patency and clinical outcome of infrapopliteal lesions., Methods and Results: Adults with critical limb ischemia (Rutherford category ≥4) and infrapopliteal lesions were randomized to receive PTA±BMS or DES with paclitaxel. Primary end point was 6-month primary binary patency of treated lesions, defined as ≤50% stenosis on computed tomographic angiography. Stenosis >50%, retreatment, major amputation, and critical limb ischemia-related death were regarded as treatment failure. Severity of failure was assessed with an ordinal score, ranging from vessel stenosis through occlusion to the clinical failures. Seventy-four limbs (73 patients) were treated with DES and 66 limbs (64 patients) received PTA±BMS. Six-month patency rates were 48.0% for DES and 35.1% for PTA±BMS (P=0.096) in the modified-intention-to-treat and 51.9% and 35.1% (P=0.037) in the per-protocol analysis. The ordinal score showed significantly worse treatment failure for PTA±BMS versus DES (P=0.041). The observed major amputation rate remained lower in the DES group until 2 years post-treatment, with a trend toward significance (P=0.066). Less minor amputations occurred after DES until 6 months post-treatment (P=0.03)., Conclusions: In patients with critical limb ischemia caused by infrapopliteal lesions, DES provide better 6-month patency rates and less amputations after 6 and 12 months compared with PTA±BMS., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00471289., (© 2016 The Authors.)

Objective: To identify predictors of failure in percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair (P-EVAR) using the Prostar XL Percutaneous Vascular Surgery Device (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the need for conversion to conventional femoral cutdown (O-EVAR)., Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent P-EVAR with the Prostar XL device between January 2009 and April 2012 were included in this series. Patients with a circular calcified common femoral artery (CFA) oncomputed tomography angiography were operated using O-EVAR and were therefore excluded. To identify predictors of success of closure in P-EVAR, artery characteristics, sheath size used, and comorbidities were analyzed in a univariate logistic regression model., Results: Percutaneous access was achieved in 154 femoral access sites with conversion to O-EVAR was needed in10 (6.5%). Significant predictors of conversion included sheath size (continuous, relative risk [RR] 1.50, p < .03)and the ratio between sheath size and CFA diameter >0.75 (RR 8.93, p < .01). Variables such as calcification quantity scores, CFA diameter, body mass index, and comorbidities were not significant., Conclusion: The data demonstrate that sheath size, in particular, combined with CFA diameter predicts failure of closure in P-EVAR using the Prostar XL device. This ratio can be utilized to help in decision making with regard to the EVAR approach. A ratio of >0.75 would favor a primary open groin approach.

Purpose: In many patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI), transfemoral endovascular recanalization is the preferred treatment. Transpopliteal treatment may be used in patients with inaccessible groins. This retrospective study regards transpopliteal stenting of superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusions using a 4F system., Materials and Methods: Eleven patients (4 male and 7 female [mean age 77 years]) underwent 12 attempts of transpopliteal recanalization of long SFA occlusions (Trans-Atlantic InterSociety Consensus B through D). All patients had CLI (Rutherford 4 to 6) and were nonoperable due to poor general condition. Indications for transpopliteal access were proximal/flush SFA occlusions (n = 5), failure of antegrade recanalization (n = 4), infected femoral-femoral crossover bypass (n = 2), and occlusion of both the native SFA and the femoral-popliteal bypass (n = 1). The popliteal artery was punctured under ultrasound guidance. Occlusions were recanalized subintimally, and 4F compatible stents were implanted., Results: Technical success rate (<30 % residual stenosis) was achieved in 83 % of cases. In two patients, stent dislocation occurred while the sheath was removed. One arteriovenous fistula was successfully treated with additional stenting. During 6-month follow-up, there were no major amputations, and three patients died from nonrelated causes. Fifty percent of patients alive after 6 months improved to Rutherford score ≤3. The duplex restenosis (>50 %) rate at 6 months was 50 %., Conclusion: Transpopliteal primary stenting of complex SFA lesions in CLI for a temporary bypass is now technically feasible using a 4F system. Technical results are promising. Clinical results after 6 months are acceptable when taking into consideration that this approach may be the last option for limb salvage.

The Percutaneous transluminal Angioplasty and Drug eluting stents for Infrapopliteal lesions in critical limb ischemia (PADI) trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-arm study investigating the safety and efficacy of primary paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation vs primary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in infrapopliteal lesions in critical limb ischemia (CLI). PTA with provisional "bailout" stent implantation is currently an accepted treatment for arterial obstructions in CLI, including those in below-the-knee arteries. A drawback compared to open bypass surgery is the relatively high restenosis rate. One proposed method to reduce restenosis is the use of drug-eluting stents (DES), as these have shown good results in the coronary bed. Primary DES implantation for focal obstructions in infrapopliteal arteries in CLI potentially reduces restenosis compared to PTA alone and may subsequently prolong effect of treatment, allowing for better wound healing, and preventing recurrence of symptoms. In this article, we report on rationale, design, and progress of the PADI trial, which investigates the safety and efficacy of a paclitaxel-eluting stent system compared to PTA with provisional bare metal stent implantation.

Objective: This study determined the average estimated total costs after treatment for peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) and evaluated the effect of postoperative complications and their consequences for the total costs., Methods: Cost data on all admissions involving treatment for PAOD from January 2007 until July 2007 were collected. A prospective analysis was made using the patient-related risk factor and comorbidity (Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society of Cardiovascular Surgeons) classification, primary and secondary treatment, and prospectively registered complications. At admission, patients without complications were placed in group A, and those with complications were in group B. Prospectively registered complications were divided into patient management (I), surgical technique (II), patient's disease (III), and outside surgical department (IV). The consequences of these were divided into minor complication, no long-term consequence (1A), additional medication or transfusion (1B), surgical reoperation (2A), prolonged hospital stay (2B), irreversible physical damage (3), and death (4). The main outcome measures were total costs of patients and costs per patient (PP), with or without the presence of complications, cost of complications and costs per complication (PC), and the costs of their consequences calculated in euros (euro)., Results: Ninety patients (mean age, 71.4 years; 59% men) were included. Group B patients had a significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (4) and Fontaine (3) classification and more secondary procedures. Total costs were euro 1,716,852: group A, euro 512,811 (PP euro 12,820); and group B, euro 1,204,042 (PP euro 24,081). The costs of the 115 complications were euro 568,500 (PC euro 4943). Split by the cause of the complication, costs were I, euro 95,924 (PC euro 2998); II, euro 163,137 (PC euro 8157); III, euro 289,578 (PC euro 5171); and IV, euro 19,861 (PC euro 2837). The increase of costs in group B was mainly caused by additional medication or transfusion (1B) euro 348,293 (61.3%), a surgical reoperation (2A) euro 118,054 (20.8%), or prolonged hospital stay (2B) euro 60,451 (10.6%). Patients who died caused 23% of the total costs., Conclusion: Complications cause an increase of the average estimated total costs in the treatment for peripheral arterial occlusive disease and are responsible for 33% of these total costs. The most expensive complications were errors in surgical technique and patient's disease, resulting in surgical reoperation or additional medication, or both, or transfusion, the two most expensive consequences.

Ruptured aneurysms of the internal iliac artery (IIA) are rare and challenging to treat surgically. Due to their anatomic location they are difficult to operate on and perioperative morbidity is high. An endovascular approach can be helpful. We recently treated a patient with a ruptured IIA aneurysm in the interventional radiology suite with embolization of the side-branch of the IIA and placement of a covered stent in the ipsilateral common and external iliac arteries. A suitable stent-graft was not available initially and had to be brought in from elsewhere. An angioplasty balloon was temporarily placed across the ostium of the IIA to obtain hemostasis. Two hours later, the procedure was finished by placing the stent-graft.

Objective: To determine the safety and the long-term results of primary stent placement for localized distal aortic occlusive disease., Design: Retrospective observational study., Patients and Methods: From July 1998 to July 2005 17 patients (14 female and 3 men, mean age 57 years (39-80)) were treated for intermittent claudication. Five of these patients underwent additional endovascular treatment of focal iliac lesions., Results: Technical success defined as residual stenosis of less than 50% or a trans-stenotic systolic pressure gradient <10% was achieved in 14 of 17 (82%) patients. Major complications included dissection at the puncture site in one patient and thrombosis of additional iliac stents in another patient. Both of these complications were successfully treated. During a mean follow-up of 27 months (range 1-86), four patients had recurrence of symptoms due to in-stent restenoses (n=2), femoral (n=1) or iliac occlusion (n=1), respectively. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, primary aortic hemodynamic patency was 83% at 3 years. Secondary aortic hemodynamic patency was 100%. The primary clinical patency was 68% at 3 years., Conclusion: Primary stent placement for distal aortic stenoses is an alternative to surgical treatment because of its high patency and relatively low complication rates.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the suitability for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) in an unselected patient population., Patients and Methods: Between February 1999 and May 2002 all consecutive patients with a nonemergent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were prospectively examined with contrast material-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT). Those patients probably suitable for EVAR on the basis of CT findings underwent calibrated angiography. A panel of radiologists and vascular surgeons reviewed the clinical data and vascular anatomy, and decided on the appropriateness of EVAR with the bifurcated Zenith AAA endovascular graft., Results: One hundred seven patients were included. Fifty-six patients (52%) had one or more contraindications for EVAR. Unsuitability was most frequently (88%) related to the proximal neck. Inadequate neck length was the most common specific reason. Inadequate iliac anatomy was the reason for unsuitability in 59% of patients. The rate of unsuitability decreased from 61% during the first half of the study to 40% during the second half (P =.03) Unsuitability was equal between men and women. Age and maximum diameter did not differ between candidates and noncandidates., Conclusion: Almost half (48%) of patients with an infrarenal AAA referred to a primary referral center are suitable for EVAR with the bifurcated Zenith AAA endovascular graft. Neck anatomy was the most frequent reason for rejection. Rate of suitability increased over time, probably as a result of increasing experience. Suitability was not influenced by gender, age, or aneurysm size.

Background: Wound dehiscence after midline laparotomy is a life threatening complication, most frequently caused by sutures cutting through the fascia. Increasing the strength of the sutured wound could prevent wound rupture., Methods: In an experimental study in the rat, the simple continuous suture (SCS), loop suture (LS), interrupted double loop closure and continuous double loop closure (CDLC) techniques were evaluated. Dehiscence pressure and volume were measured after closing a standard laparotomy., Results: Laparotomies closed with the newly developed CDLC technique could withstand by far the highest intra-abdominal pressure before dehiscence (P < 0.0002). Wounds closed with this technique remained well approximated regardless of the intra-abdominal pressure, unlike wounds closed with the frequently used SCS and LS methods., Conclusion: In all animals sutured with the CDLC technique the intact abdominal wall ruptured lateral to the wound at dehiscence pressure, indicating that the bursting strength of the sutured wound was higher than that of the intact abdominal wall.