Search

Purpose: DWI is a promising modality in breast MRI, but its clinical acceptance is slow. Analysis of DWI is hampered by geometric distortion artifacts, which are caused by off-resonant spins in combination with the low phase-encoding bandwidth of the EPI sequence used. Existing correction methods assume smooth off-resonance fields, which we show to be invalid in the human breast, where high discontinuities arise at tissue interfaces. Methods: We developed a distortion correction method that incorporates high-resolution off-resonance maps to better solve for severe distortions at tissue interfaces. The method was evaluated quantitatively both ex vivo in a porcine tissue phantom and in vivo in 5 healthy volunteers. The added value of high-resolution off-resonance maps was tested using a Wilcoxon signed rank test comparing the quantitative results obtained with a low-resolution off-resonance map with those obtained with a high-resolution map. Results: Distortion correction using low-resolution off-resonance maps corrected most of the distortions, as expected. Still, all quantitative comparison metrics showed increased conformity between the corrected EPI images and a high-bandwidth reference scan for both the ex vivo and in vivo experiments. All metrics showed a significant improvement when a high-resolution off-resonance map was used (P < 0.05), in particular at tissue boundaries. Conclusion: The use of off-resonance maps of a resolution higher than EPI scans significantly improves upon existing distortion correction techniques, specifically by superior correction at glandular tissue boundaries.

Purpose: To investigate the sequence-specific impact of B + 1 amplitude mapping on the accuracy and precision of permittivity reconstruction at 3T in the pelvic region. Methods: B + 1 maps obtained with actual flip angle imaging (AFI), Bloch–Siegert (BS), and dual refocusing echo acquisition mode (DREAM) sequences, set to a clinically feasible scan time of 5 minutes, were compared in terms of accuracy and precision with electromagnetic and Bloch simulations and MR measurements. Permittivity maps were reconstructed based on these B + 1 maps with Helmholtz-based electrical properties tomography. Accuracy and precision in permittivity were assessed. A 2-compartment phantom with properties and size similar to the human pelvis was used for both simulations and measurements. Measurements were also performed on a female volunteer’s pelvis. Results: Accuracy was evaluated with noiseless simulations on the phantom. The maximum B + 1 bias relative to the true B + 1 distribution was 1% for AFI and BS and 6% to 15% for DREAM. This caused an average permittivity bias relative to the true permittivity of 7% to 20% for AFI and BS and 12% to 35% for DREAM. Precision was assessed in MR experiments. The lowest standard deviation in permittivity, found in the phantom for BS, measured 22.4 relative units and corresponded to a standard deviation in B + 1 of 0.2% of the B + 1 average value. As regards B + 1 precision, in vivo and phantom measurements were comparable. Conclusions: Our simulation framework quantitatively predicts the different impact of B + 1 mapping techniques on permittivity reconstruction and shows high sensitivity of permittivity reconstructions to sequence-specific bias and noise perturbation in the B + 1 map. These findings are supported by the experimental results.

PURPOSE: To investigate the sequence-specific impact of B 1 + amplitude mapping on the accuracy and precision of permittivity reconstruction at 3T in the pelvic region. METHODS: B 1 + maps obtained with actual flip angle imaging (AFI), Bloch-Siegert (BS), and dual refocusing echo acquisition mode (DREAM) sequences, set to a clinically feasible scan time of 5 minutes, were compared in terms of accuracy and precision with electromagnetic and Bloch simulations and MR measurements. Permittivity maps were reconstructed based on these B 1 + maps with Helmholtz-based electrical properties tomography. Accuracy and precision in permittivity were assessed. A 2-compartment phantom with properties and size similar to the human pelvis was used for both simulations and measurements. Measurements were also performed on a female volunteer's pelvis. RESULTS: Accuracy was evaluated with noiseless simulations on the phantom. The maximum B 1 + bias relative to the true B 1 + distribution was 1% for AFI and BS and 6% to 15% for DREAM. This caused an average permittivity bias relative to the true permittivity of 7% to 20% for AFI and BS and 12% to 35% for DREAM. Precision was assessed in MR experiments. The lowest standard deviation in permittivity, found in the phantom for BS, measured 22.4 relative units and corresponded to a standard deviation in B 1 + of 0.2% of the B 1 + average value. As regards B 1 + precision, in vivo and phantom measurements were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Our simulation framework quantitatively predicts the different impact of B 1 + mapping techniques on permittivity reconstruction and shows high sensitivity of permittivity reconstructions to sequence-specific bias and noise perturbation in the B 1 + map. These findings are supported by the experimental results.