Search

Objective: The transplantation waiting list is getting longer day by day with the spread of lung transplantation and awareness of it. However, the donor pool cannot keep up with this rate. Therefore, nonstandard (marginal) donors are widely used. By studying the lung donors presented at our center, we aimed to raise awareness of the donor shortage and compare clinical outcomes in recipients with standard and marginal donors. Materials and Methods: The data from recipients and donors of lung transplants performed at our center between March 2013 and November 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and recorded. Transplants with ideal and standard donors were classified as group 1, and those with marginal donors were classified as group 2. Primary graft dysfunction rates, intensive care unit, and hospital stay days were compared. Results: Eighty-nine lung transplants were performed. A total of 46 recipients were in group 1 and 43 were in group 2. There were no differences between groups in the development of stage 3 primary graft dysfunction. However, a significant difference was found in the marginal group for developing any stage primary graft dysfunction. Donors were mostly from the western and southern regions of the country and from the education and research hospitals. Conclusion: Because of the donor shortage in lung transplantation, transplant teams tend to use marginal donors. Stimulating and supportive education for healthcare professionals to recognize brain death and public education to raise awareness about organ donation are necessary to spread organ donation throughout the country. Although our results using marginal donors are similar with the standard group, each recipient and donor should be assessed individually. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of the Society of Thoracic Carido-Vascular Anaesthesia & Intensive Care is the property of Gogus Kalp Damar Anestezi ve Yogun Bakim Dernegi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Anesthesiology Reanimation is the property of Turkiye Klinikleri and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of the Society of Thoracic Carido-Vascular Anaesthesia & Intensive Care is the property of Gogus Kalp Damar Anestezi ve Yogun Bakim Dernegi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Anesthesia & Reanimation is the property of Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology & Reanimation and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a progressive airway disease that can progress to the terminal stage requiring oxygen supply. In this period, lung volume reduction therapies and/or lung transplantation may be considered. Morbidity and mortality risks due to transplant surgery and posttransplant immunosuppressive therapy show the importance of selecting the best candidates who will benefit from transplantation. In this context, BODE index criteria serve as important markers. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of lung transplantation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and to identify variables that may affect post-transplant clinical outcomes., Materials and Methods: Lung transplants diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease performed in our center between March 2013 and January 2023 were included in the study. Demographic information and both pre-op and post-op clinical data of the transplant patients were collected. The effect of BODE index criteria and other pre-transplant clinical data on short- and long-term outcomes after transplantation were investigated., Results: During the study period, 34 lung transplants were performed for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. One patient died during the operation, three patients received single transplants, and 30 received double transplants. Post-operative primary graft dysfunction was more common in single transplant recipients. The results were comparable between single and double transplants in terms of post-transplant pulmonary function and the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. BODE index criteria had no effect on early and late post-operative clinical data, however intra-operative use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, primary graft dysfunction, and prolonged extubation were significantly higher in recipients younger than 60 years., Conclusion: Our study suggests that prelisting demographic and clinical data of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients had no significant effect on post-operative outcomes, however, intra-operative ECMO use, prolonged extubation, primary graft dysfunction (p< 0.05 for each) and chronic rejection (p> 0.05) were more common in patients who are <60 years of age. These data need to be confirmed by larger studies.

Background: This study aims to evaluate the effect of intraoperative fluid therapy on intensive care process and first 90-day morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing lung transplantation., Methods: Between March 2013 and December 2020, a total of 77 patients (64 males, 13 females; mean age: 47.6±13.0 years; range, 19 to 67 years) who underwent lung transplantation were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the amount of fluid given intraoperatively: Group 1 (<15 mL/kg -1 /h -1 ) and Group 2 (>15 mL/kg -1 /h -1 ). Demographic, clinical, intra- and postoperative data of the patients were recorded., Results: Less than 15 mL/kg-1/h-1 f luid w as a dministered t o 75.3% (n=58) of the patients (Group 1) and 24.7% (n=19) were administered more than 15 mL/kg-1/h-1 (Group 2). In t erms of native disease, the rate of diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis was higher in Group 1, and the rate of other diagnoses was higher in Group 2 (p<0.01). The ratio of women in Group 2 was higher (p<0.05), while the body mass index values were significantly lower in this group (p<0.01). The erythrocyte, fresh frozen plasma, platelet, crystalloid and total fluid given in Group 2 were significantly higher (p<0.001). Inotropic/vasopressor agent use rates and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation requirement were significantly higher in Group 2 (p<0.01). Primary graft dysfunction, gastrointestinal complications, and mortality rates were also significantly higher in Group 2 (p<0.05)., Conclusion: The increased intraoperative fluid volume in lung transplantation is associated with primary graft dysfunction, gastrointestinal complications, and mortality rates., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2023, Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery.)