Search

In addition to patient care, physiotherapy is increasingly important in research at university hospitals. Genuine physiotherapy research plays a decisive role in this. This position statement describes the opportunities, benefits, framework conditions, challenges, and research priorities of genuine physiotherapy research at German university hospitals.

Introduction: The personal and environmental contextual factors of the ICF describe not only physical and mental health but also (occupational) participation. So far, the extent to which these contextual factors are taken into account in the socio-medical evaluation has not been clarified. Contextual factors can guide allocation to disability pension or rehabilitative interventions in an individualized and targeted manner. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of ICF contextual factors in socio-medical evaluation., Methodology: A frequency analysis of contextual factors in socio-medical reports for musculoskeletal disorders was performed. Contextual factors mentioned several times were coded once in the report. In the frequency ranking, each environmental and personal factor was categorized as "frequent," "moderate," and "rare.", Results: 215 socio-medical reports with musculoskeletal diagnoses starting from 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All socio medical reports were analyzed for the occurence of personal contextual and environmental factors. In particular, personal factors were identified, which provide information about general personal characteristics or the general state of health. Almost half of the environmental factors were rarely identified., Conclusion: Many ICF contextual factors are constantly recorded in the analyzed reports. The important influence of these factors on return to work is well known. Thus, the absence or low presence of the ICF contextual factors from the chapters Attitudes (i4), Basic Skills (i4) and Support & Relationships (e3), which are also contextual to the assessed person's experience of the world of work, was surprising. The relevance of the frequently and rarely identified contextual factors for the socio-medical evaluation of musculoskeletal disability pension applicants must be questioned., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Objective: COVID-19 can result in a broad spectrum of dysfunctions, some of which may persist for long periods, requiring long-term rehabilitation. A comprehensive screening tool is therefore necessary to identify these needs. To date, no data exist on satisfaction with medical and therapeutic interventions for COVID-19 in terms of quality and quantity. The aim of this study is to develop a survey for use with COVID-19 patients during and after the end of the acute phase of the disease., Methods: Following the definition of dimensions by a group of experts, and a literature search, proven survey instruments were searched for suitable items. In addition, specific questions were developed based on symptoms, and answer options were created with regard to to the complexity of the questions., Results: The COVID-19 Rehabilitation Needs Survey (C19-RehabNeS) consists of the established 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) together with the newly developed COVID-19-Rehabilitation Needs Questionnaire (C19-RehabNeQ) (11 further dimensions, respectively 57 items)., Conclusion: C19-RehabNeS is a comprehensive survey to assess functional limitations and rehabilitation needs during and after infection with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). The strength of this survey is that it combines the assessment of important rehabilitation needs with assessment of satisfaction with the health services, treatment and therapy during the pandemic (C19-RehabNeQ) and assessment of patients' quality of life (SF-36). The C19-RehabNeS survey also enables collection of systematic information on patients with Post-COVID-19 syndrome (Long-COVID-19).

Purpose: Multiple organizations like UN and WHO call for the collection of internationally comparable data on living and supply conditions of people with disabilities. Furthermore, reliable national data are necessary for ensuring appropriate care. Regarding patients with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in Germany, only data on diagnostics or therapeutic interventions is currently available. The International Spinal Cord Injury Survey aims at collecting reliable data of people with SCI in 21 countries and developing recommendations for actions to be taken by policy-makers and other decision-makers., Methods: In 2017, eight specialized SCI-centers across Germany sent a standardized questionnaire to their patients who had diagnosis of SCI, and were older than 18 years (n=5,598). The questionnaire could be completed paper-based or online., Results: 1,479 patients participated in the study and were included in data analysis. On average, participants were 55.3 years (SD=14.6) old, ¾ were male. The mean time of onset of paralysis was 13.9 years. Two thirds of the spinal cord injury causes were traumatic. In 51.2% SCI was classified as paraplegia. The most frequently cited health problem was sexual dysfunction. Medical treatment for this problem was rarely used. Serious environmental barriers were the inadequate accessibility of private households and public places. 42.5% of the respondents in working age were employed, which is 10% less than in Switzerland., Discussion: Serious problems in environmental barriers, medical care and labor market participation were identified for people with SCI. The results will be reported to and discussed with political decision makers and further actors to create solutions. This requires extensive efforts, like modification in building law and home support., Competing Interests: Die finanzielle Förderung erfolgte durch die Manfred-Sauer-Stiftung. Der Stifter ist selbst querschnittgelähmt und Hersteller von Inkontinenzhilfsmitteln. Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Purpose: Identification of patient-related influencing factors on access to follow-up rehabilitation METHODS: Partially standardized, written survey of patients between the ages of 18 and 65 in 3 acute hospitals in Hanover, who were assigned to one of the following six defined indication groups on the basis of their diagnosis: (1) surgically treated bone fractures, (2) knee and hip endoprosthesis, (3) malignant disease from visceral surgery, (4) heart disease without surgical intervention, (5) heart disease with surgical intervention, and (6) stroke. In addition to personal information (such as age and gender) personal rehabilitation goals, rehabilitation motivation, disease processing, functioning, state of health, the knowledge of right to request and suffrage and the personal desire to start a follow-up rehabilitation were raised., Results: Of the 1,227 patients surveyed, 42.5% received follow-up rehabilitation. The percentages between the groups of diagnoses varied widely and were lowest after conservatively treated heart disease (3.2%) and highest after knee and hip joint replacement (98.1%). Including cases with a follow-up rehabilitation relevant diagnosis (n=1,000), the proportion of persons with rehabilitation increased to 51.7% (p<0.001). Reasons for an untreated follow-up rehabilitation were in rare cases the rejection by the payer (0.7%), the rejection by the patient (1.6%) or the lack of rehabilitation ability (3.3%). However in most cases the application remained without further differentiation (28.5%). The most important factor influencing follow-up rehabilitation access were diagnosis. Compared to knee- and hip endoprosthesis, the patients from other relevant diagnosis groups had a much lower chance to start a follow-up rehabilitation (OR from 0,01 up to 0,07; p<0,001). The desire of the patient showed the second most and significant influence to get follow-up rehabilitation (OR=8.18; p<0.001)., Conclusions: The diagnosis was identified as the most important criterion for follow-up rehabilitation access. No measurable factors of functioning seem to have a big influence. Therefore, the individual doctor's decision to submit an application is of particular importance. Especially because of the low level of medical knowledge on the indication catalog of the German pension insurance, the medical treatment based on professional experience as well as the lack of further education possibilities (Gottschling-Lang, 2016), it can be assumed that the follow-up rehabilitation is less standardized and systematic. In order to ensure a need-based patient care, assessment procedures should be established and the training and continuing education of physicians should be supplemented with the topic of follow-up rehabilitation., Competing Interests: Die Studie wurde finanziell gefördert durch die Deutsche Rentenversicherung Braunschweig-Hannover., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)