Search

Electron spectroscopy proves to be a handy tool in material science. Combination of electron spectroscopy and scanning probe microscopy is possible through Scanning Field Emission Microscopy (SFEM), where a metallic probe positioned close to the surface is used as an electron source. However, using this not too much technologically demanding technique, it looks like the compromise between the lateral resolution and spectroscopic clarity must be considered. Here, we demonstrate, using experimental and simulation data, that the spectroscopic information can be understood without the need to grossly deteriorate the potential spatial resolution of the microscope. We prepared a three-section sample with clean W(110), sub-monolayer Cs on W(110) and monolayer of Cs on W(110) on which electron energy loss spectra are obtained via Scanning Probe Energy Loss Spectroscopy (SPELS) measurements. To explain the detected spectra a new model describing SPELS measurements in a SFEM is developed which aids to uncover the origin of spectral features typically detected during experiments. Experimental and simulation data are in a mutual agreement and observed spectral features on different surfaces could be explained. This novel understanding of SPELS can solve the main issue previously related to this technique, and good spatial resolution can be accompanied by the understanding of the measured spectra., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The laser-driven ultrafast demagnetization effect is one of the long-standing problems in solid-state physics. The time scale is given not only by the transfer of energy, but also by the transport of angular momentum away from the spin system. Through a double-pulse experiment resembling two-dimensional spectroscopy, we separate the different pathways by their nonlinear properties. We find (a) that the loss of magnetization within 400 fs is not affected by the previous excitations (linear process), and (b) we observe a picosecond demagnetization contribution that is strongly affected by the previous excitations. Our experimental approach is useful not only for studying femtosecond spin dynamics, but can also be adapted to other problems in solid-state dynamics.

We perform scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) in a regime where primary electrons are field-emitted from the tip and excite secondary electrons out of the target-the scanning field-emission microscopy regime (SFM). In the SFM mode, a secondary-electron contrast as high as 30% is observed when imaging a monoatomic step between a clean W(110)- and an Fe-covered W(110)-terrace. This is a figure of contrast comparable to STM. The apparent width of the monoatomic step attains the 1  nm mark, i.e. it is only marginally worse than the corresponding width observed in STM. The origin of the unexpected strong contrast in SFM is the material dependence of the secondary-electron yield and not the dependence of the transported current on the tip-target distance, typical of STM: accordingly, we expect that a technology combining STM and SFM will highlight complementary aspects of a surface while simultaneously making electrons, selected with nanometre spatial precision, available to a macroscopic environment for further processing.