Search

Background: Antibiotic overuse leads to the emergence of antibiotic resistance that threatens immunocompromised cancer patients. Infections caused by MDR Gram-negative pathogens are difficult to treat and associated with high mortality. Hence, empirical therapy with standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotics could be suboptimal in these vulnerable patients. New antibiotics covering potential resistant pathogens may be considered., Methods: We conducted a randomized non-inferiority study comparing safety and efficacy of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IPM/REL), a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, with SOC antibiotics (cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem) in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. Patients received at least 48 h of IV antibiotics and were assessed at end-of-IV (EOIV) therapy, test of cure (TOC; Days 21-28), and late follow-up (LFU; Days 35-42)., Results: A total of 100 patients were enrolled (49 IPM/REL and 50 SOC). Demographics and rates of documented microbiological infections were similar in both groups. In the SOC arm, 86% of antibiotics consisted of cefepime. Patients on IPM/REL had a higher favourable clinical response at EOIV than those on SOC (90% versus 74%; P = 0.042); however, responses were similar at TOC and LFU. Microbiological eradication was comparable at all three timepoints. Study drug-related adverse events and adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were similar in both groups, with no study drug-related mortality., Conclusions: Our results suggest that compared with SOC antibiotics, predominantly cefepime, IPM/REL for empirical coverage of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients is generally safe and could be associated with a better clinical outcome at EOIV. The current SOC consisting mainly of agents that do not cover for ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bacteria should be reconsidered., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Zopiclone, a controlled substance prescribed for insomnia, has become a common toxicological finding in forensic autopsy cases. This study investigated the role and extent of zopiclone use in fatal intoxications in Sweden., Methods: All forensic autopsy cases positive for zopiclone in femoral blood during 2012-2020 were selected. Among these cases, fatalities caused by intoxication according to the cause of death certificates issued by the forensic pathologist were identified. Intoxications where zopiclone contributed to the cause of death were included in the study. The Swedish Prescribed Drug Register was utilized to examine whether the included cases were prescribed zopiclone or not., Results: In total 7320 fatal intoxications underwent a forensic autopsy during the study period, 573 of them were caused by zopiclone. Among the zopiclone fatalities, 87% (n = 494) had a prescription for zopiclone, and 8% (n = 43) were monointoxications. Most fatalities, 62% (n = 354) were suicides, and zopiclone was involved in about 17% (n = 354) of all intoxication suicides in Sweden. Women were significantly (p < 0.01) overrepresented in suicides with zopiclone, comprising 56% (n = 291) of fatalities. The median age was 55 years among zopiclone intoxications compared with 44 years amongst all fatal intoxications., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the toxicity of zopiclone can be lethal both in combination with other substances and on its own. Most individuals dying in fatal zopiclone intoxications were prescribed zopiclone, which potentially indicates that a more restrictive prescribing rate could prevent future intoxication deaths, especially when caring for patients with an increased suicide risk., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is a combination of a well-known third-generation, broad-spectrum cephalosporin with a new beta-lactamase inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of various infectious diseases (especially multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The current study extensively assessed CAZ/AVI-related adverse events (AEs) in the real world through data mining of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to better understand toxicities. The signals of CAZ/AVI-related AEs were quantified using disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio, the proportional reporting ratio, the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker algorithms. Out of 10,114,815 records retrieved from the FAERS database, 628 cases were identified, where CAZ/AVI was implicated as the primary suspect drug. A total of 61 preferred terms with significant disproportionality that simultaneously met the criteria of all four algorithms were retained. Several unexpected safety signals may also occur, including melena, hypernatremia, depressed level of consciousness, brain edema, petechiae, delirium, and shock hemorrhagic. The median onset time for AEs associated with CAZ/AVI was 4 days, with most cases occurring within 3 days after CAZ/AVI initiation., (© 2024, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli infections are a global health challenge, notably in North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness and safety of cefotaxime combined with avibactam, aiming to mitigate these infections' impact and lessen their burden on healthcare systems worldwide., Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and PICO frameworks, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across 4 primary databases on May 6, 2023. Studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of cefotaxime and avibactam were included. Key outcomes included treatment success, adverse effects, and microbiological eradication. Quality assessment utilized the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias instrument. Heterogeneity was analyzed using chi-square statistics and the I2 index. Both fixed- and random-effects models were applied as appropriate. Publication bias was rigorously evaluated using Egger linear regression test and funnel plot analysis, ensuring the study's integrity and reliability., Results: The clinical cure rate derived from 8 studies showed no significant difference between the treatment groups (odds ratio [OR] = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.36, P = .86). Analysis of the bacterial clearance rate from the 5 studies also indicated no significant difference (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.42 to 2.25, P = .36). Notably, a reduced mortality rate favoring the experimental group was observed in 6 studies (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.92, P = .012). Comprehensive sensitivity analyses and the assessment of publication bias strengthened the reliability of the results., Conclusions: Ceftazidime combined with avibactam significantly reduced mortality among patients with multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli infections, indicating its potential as a therapeutic option, especially for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. However, extensive large-scale clinical trials are required to validate these findings., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is approved for the treatment of serious gram-negative bacterial infections in adults. This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of a single dose of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (with a fixed 2:1 ratio of imipenem/cilastatin to relebactam, and with a maximum dose of 15 mg/kg imipenem and 15 mg/kg cilastatin [≤500 mg imipenem and ≤500 mg cilastatin] and 7.5 mg/kg relebactam [≤250 mg relebactam]) in children with confirmed/suspected gram-negative bacterial infections receiving standard-of-care antibacterial therapy. In this phase 1, noncomparative study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03230916), PK parameters from 46 children were analyzed using both population modeling and noncompartmental analysis. The PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target for imipenem was percent time of the dosing interval that unbound plasma concentration exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT>MIC) of ≥30% (MIC = 2 mcg/mL). For relebactam, the PK/PD target was a free drug area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) normalized to MIC (at 2 mcg/mL) of ≥8.0 (equivalent to an AUC from time zero extrapolated to infinity of ≥20.52 mcg·h/mL). Safety was assessed up to 14 days after drug infusion. For imipenem, the ranges for the geometric mean %fT>MIC and maximum concentration (C max ) across age cohorts were 56.5%-93.7% and 32.2-38.2 mcg/mL, respectively. For relebactam, the ranges of the geometric mean C max and AUC from 0 to 6 hours across age cohorts were 16.9-21.3 mcg/mL and 26.1-55.3 mcg·h/mL, respectively. In total, 8/46 (17%) children experienced ≥1 adverse events (AEs) and 2/46 (4%) children experienced nonserious AEs that were deemed drug related by the investigator. Imipenem and relebactam exceeded plasma PK/PD targets; single doses of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam were well tolerated with no significant safety concerns identified. These results informed imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam dose selection for further pediatric clinical evaluation., (© 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

This phase I study evaluated the safety of the optimal ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) with aztreonam (ATM) regimens identified in hollow fiber infection models of MBL-producing Enterobacterales. Eligible healthy subjects aged 18 to 45 years were assigned to one of six cohorts: 2.5 g CZA over 2 h every 8 h (approved dose), CZA continuous infusion (CI) (7.5 g daily), 2 g ATM over 2 h every 6 h, ATM CI (8 g daily), CZA (approved dose) with 1.5 g ATM over 2 h every 6 h, and CZA (approved dose) with 2 g ATM over 2 h every 6 h. Study drug(s) were administered for 7 days. The most frequently observed adverse events (AEs) were hepatic aminotransferase (ALT/AST) elevations ( n  = 19 subjects). Seventeen of the 19 subjects with ALT/AST elevations received ATM alone or CZA-ATM. The incidence of ALT/AST elevations was comparable between the ATM-alone and CZA-ATM cohorts. Two subjects in the ATM CI cohort experienced severe ALT/AST elevation AEs. All subjects with ALT/AST elevations were asymptomatic with no other findings suggestive of liver injury. Most other AEs were of mild to moderate severity and were similar across cohorts, except for prolonged prothrombin time (more frequent in CZA-ATM cohorts). These results suggest that CZA-ATM administered as 2-h intermittent infusions is safe and that some caution should be exercised with the use of ATM CI at an ATM dose of 8 g daily. If CZA-ATM is prescribed, clinicians are advised to monitor liver function, hematologic, and coagulation parameters. Future controlled studies are required to better define the safety and efficacy of the CZA-ATM regimens evaluated in this phase I study.

Background: The efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam were mainly reported in phase II and phase III clinical trials, rarely in the real-world study. The limited real-world study which evaluated the clinical response of this drug shown inconsistent results. This study aimed to investigate the rationality of the clinical use of ceftazidime-avibactam and to evaluate its clinical response in the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) infections in China., Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of adult patients with MDR-GNB infections treated with ceftazidime-avibactam during September 2018 to August 2020. Patients' characteristics, comorbidities, microbes, laboratory indicators and medication information were collected. The rationality of ceftazidime-avibactam clinical use, and its clinical response in the treatment of MDR-GNB infections were analyzed., Results: A total of 30 patients were included in this study, of which, 66.6% received target treatment, 26.7% received empirical treatment, and 6.7% received treatment with no indication. Only 50.0% (11/22) of patients were administrated the recommended dose according to the drug instruction or guidelines, at a median treatment duration of 10 days (range: 2-74 days). The most common source of infection was pneumonia (53.6%, 15/28). Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae was the predominant pathogen (65%, 13/20). A total of 16 patients (61.5%) achieved clinical response. Patients received target treatment had higher clinical response rate than that of patients received empirical treatment (77.8% vs 25.0%, P = 0.026). A total of 11 patients (61.1%) achieved microbiological response. One patient occurred gastrointestinal adverse reactions., Conclusions: It is necessary to strengthen the monitor of the clinical application of ceftazidime-avibactam, such as the appropriate indication, reasonable dosage and duration, to improve its clinical outcome. Our results showed that ceftazidime-avibactam might be a potencial choice for the MDR-GNB infections. However, further research are still needed to identify its efficacy and safety in the real world., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The post-antibiotic effect (PAE) of ceftazidime-avibactam in vivo was evaluated using models of thigh- and lung-infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in neutropenic mice. In thigh-infected mice, the PAE was negative (-2.18 to -0.11 h) for three of four strains: caused by a 'burst' of rapid bacterial growth after the drug concentrations had fallen below their pre-specified target values. With lung infection, PAE was positive, and longer for target drug concentrations in ELF (>2 h) than plasma (1.69-1.88 h). The time to the start of regrowth was quantified as a new parameter, PAE R , which was positive (0.35-1.00 h) in both thigh- and lung-infected mice. In the context that measurements of the PAE of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in vivo have not previously been reported, it is noted that the negative values were consistent with previous measurements of the PAE of ceftazidime-avibactam in vitro and of ceftazidime alone in vivo .

Considering the global increase in use of Z-drugs to treat insomnia, the study objective was to conduct a systematic review on the efficacy and safety of zopiclone to treat sleep disorders in older adults compared to other sedative-hypnotics, to placebo or to non-pharmacological interventions. The literature search for original reports - clinical trials, cohort studies and cross-sectional, observational investigations - was done in eleven databases and web search engines followed PRISMA guidelines, and methodological quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias tool in the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook. The search resulted in 12 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials along with 2 open studies and 2 observational reports. Overall, the studies suggest that zopiclone is effective to treat insomnia by reducing sleep latency, nocturnal awakenings and wake time after sleep onset while increasing total sleep time, with probable effects on sleep architecture. Zopiclone was found to be fairly tolerated, to induce a low rate of adverse events with non-severe impact on psychomotor or cognitive performance and to produce no major harm to the overall well-being and daily living abilities. However, the quality of most studies was classified as low or unclear. Though the studies available support benefits from zopiclone use, there is still a need for further evidence on long-term effects, tolerability and safety in the treatment of older adults by means of high-quality trials., Competing Interests: Conflict of interests None., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Durlobactam (formerly ETX2514) is a diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitor that inhibits class A, C, and D β-lactamases. Sulbactam combined with durlobactam has in vitro and in vivo activity against Acinetobacter baumannii including carbapenem- and colistin-resistant isolates and is being developed for treating serious infections due to A. baumannii. The effect of a single supratherapeutic dose of durlobactam on the heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc) was evaluated in healthy subjects in a placebo- and active-controlled, single-infusion, three-way crossover study. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 6 sequences that included a single 3-h i.v. infusion of durlobactam 4 g (supratherapeutic dose), a single 3-h i.v. infusion of placebo, and a single 3-h i.v. infusion of placebo plus a single oral dose of moxifloxacin 400 mg given open-label at the end of the i.v. infusion. In each treatment period, Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements were obtained from predose through 24 h post-start of infusion. For the primary ECG end point, placebo-corrected change-from-baseline corrected QT Fridericia's formula (ΔΔQTcF), no significant change was observed with durlobactam. A concentration-QT analysis demonstrated no significant effect of durlobactam on ECG parameters, including QT interval prolongation. Thus, durlobactam has a low risk for prolonging the QT interval and is unlikely to produce any proarrhythmic effects., (© 2021 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Rationale: Eszopiclone, sold under the brand name Lunesta, is a new type of non-benzodiazepine hypnotic. Eszopiclone is a zopiclone dextrorotation, which is classified as a cyclopyrrolone. It functions by binding gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors. Compared with benzodiazepines hypnotics, eszopiclone has higher selectivity for certain subunits of the GABA(A) receptor. So far, there are no reports about the elevation of serum enzymes or severe liver injury caused by eszopiclone. Here, we present a case report of acute liver injury following eszopiclone treatment in a patient with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)., Patient Concerns: The patient was a 53-year-old female with a 36-year history of positive HBV markers. Due to poor sleep, the patient took trazodone hydrochloride orally for 1 year. After hospital admission for positive hepatitis B pathogenic markers, abdominal distension, fatigue, and aggravation, she was treated with eszopiclone under the guidance of the mental health department., Diagnoses: Her transaminase levels increased abnormally after eszopiclone treatment and rapidly decreased after drug withdrawal. This was determined to be an acute liver injury event. liver-protecting treatment was maintained. Considering the patient's anxiety and depression, the patient's family members refused a liver biopsy., Outcomes: Transaminase levels decreased rapidly within one week, and the patient continued to take trazodone hydrochloride after discharge. No adverse events occurred in the follow-up period., Lessons: Sleep disorders are more common in patients with chronic diseases, especially patients with chronic liver disease. Recently, it has become common for patients with hepatitis B and C to use antidepressants along with antiviral treatment. Patients with chronic hepatitis B or C may have a threefold risk of liver dysfunction after receiving antituberculosis treatment.[1,2] A proinflammatory environment induced by actively replicating the hepatitis virus may alter the detoxication process and increase drug toxicity.[3] At this time, the safety of other drugs should be reevaluated. Although hepatitis and liver injury are listed as rare adverse reactions of eszopiclone, this case is the first to report the eszopiclone-involved acute liver injury., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

The purpose of this study is to characterize adverse events (AEs) of clinical interest reported with ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, as an aid in monitoring patients affected by severe multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. We queried the worldwide FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and performed disproportionality analysis, selecting only designated medical events (DMEs) where ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam were reported as suspect. Serious neurological AEs were further investigated. The reporting odds ratios were calculated, deemed significant by the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (LL95% CI) > 1. All other drugs/events recorded in FAERS and cephalosporins showing clinical evidence of neurological AEs were respectively selected as comparator for analysis of DMEs and neurotoxicity. Qualitative analysis including case-by-case assessment and deduplication was also performed. Overall, 654 and 506 reports mentioning respectively ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam were found, with DMEs accounting respectively for 13.1% and 10.9% of cases. Agranulocytosis (N = 12; LL95% CI = 12.40) and pancytopenia (14; 6.18) emerged as unexpected AEs with ceftolozane-tazobactam, while acute pancreatitis (7; 8.63) was an over-reported unexpected DME with ceftazidime-avibactam. After deduplication, four unequivocally different cases of agranulocytosis with ceftolozane-tazobactam were retained, occurring on average after 8.8 days. Causality was probable and possible respectively in three and one case. Among neurological AEs exhibiting significant disproportionality, encephalopathy with both antibiotics and mental status changes with ceftazidime-avibactam were retained in at least three cases after deduplication. Although rare, clinicians should monitor high-risk patients (i.e. individuals affected by haematological malignances, HIV infection, or treated with concomitant myelotoxic agents) for early unexpected occurrence of agranulocytosis with ceftolozane-tazobactam.

Purpose: The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antimicrobial activity, efficacy, safety, and current regulatory status of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam are reviewed., Summary: Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is a newly approved anti-infective combination of a well-established β-lactam and a new β-lactamase inhibitor for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis, and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) caused by susceptible gram-negative bacteria in patients 18 years of age or older with limited or no alternative treatment options. The antibiotic is also indicated for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP). The antibiotic is active in vitro against a wide range of pathogens, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) such as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase. The addition of relebactam does not restore the activity of imipenem against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Two phase 3 clinical trials of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam were conducted. In the RESTORE-IMI 1 trial, the efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was found to be comparable to that of imipenem/cilastatin plus colistin for the treatment of infections caused by imipenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative bacteria in patients with HABP/VABP, cUTIs, and cIAIs, with a significantly lower incidence of nephrotoxicity reported with the new antibiotic. The RESTORE-IMI 2 trial demonstrated the noninferiority of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam to piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of HABP/VABP. Commonly reported adverse events in clinical trials included anemia, elevated liver enzymes, electrolyte imbalances, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fever, phlebitis and/or infusion-site reactions, and hypertension., Conclusion: Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against MDR gram-negative bacteria, including many CRE but excluding MBL-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. It is approved for the treatment of cUTIs, cIAIs, and HABP/VABP., (© American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin is approved in the United States to treat complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections in patients who have limited or no alternative treatment options and hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP)/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP). Initial pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability studies of relebactam with and without imipenem/cilastatin included mostly Caucasian participants. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin in 12 healthy Chinese participants after three single doses of increasing concentrations (relebactam at 125, 250, or 500 mg; cilastatin at 250, 500, or 1,000 mg; and imipenem at 250, 500, or 1,000 mg) and after multiple doses every 6 h of a single concentration (relebactam at 250 mg, cilastatin at 500 mg, and imipenem at 500 mg) for 14 days. After single doses, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) extrapolated to infinity (relebactam, 15.0 to 70.7 h · mg/liter; imipenem, 24.1 to 109.8 h · mg/liter; cilastatin, 18.4 to 95.3 h · mg/liter) and the AUC from 0 to 6 h (relebactam, 14.2 to 66.3 h · mg/liter; imipenem, 23.4 to 107.3 h · mg/liter; cilastatin, 18.3 to 94.4 h · mg/liter) increased in a dose-dependent manner; clearance (relebactam, 6.9 to 8.3 liters/h; imipenem, 8.6 to 10.4 liters/h; cilastatin, 10.5 to 13.6 liters/h) and half-life (relebactam, 1.4 to 1.6 h; imipenem, 1.0 to 1.2 h; cilastatin, 0.7 to 1.0 h) were consistent between doses. Pharmacokinetic parameters after multiple doses were similar to parameters after a single dose (geometric mean ratios of 0.8 to 1.0 for all three agents). Relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin was well tolerated; mild adverse events occurred during single dosing, and one participant experienced serious adverse events after multiple doses. Pharmacokinetics and safety data are comparable with data from participants of other ethnicities, supporting the use of relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin at the approved dose and schedule in Chinese patients., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.)

Benzodiazepines and Z-drugs, zolpidem and zopiclone, (BZD/Z) are used longer than recommended in the elderly population. However, to date, very few attempts have been made to evaluate dependence on BDZ/Z among the elderly population. We conducted a national multicentric observational prospective study aimed at evaluating the prevalence of and risk factors for dependence among elderly adults. Patients aged 65 or older who were treated with BZD/Z for at least 3 months were evaluated through clinical interviews that conformed to official Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) dependence criteria. Among the 1,024 patients included in the survey, 442 of 976 (45.3%) met the dependence criteria. In the multivariate logistic regression model, dependent patients were categorized as follows: younger (odds ratio (OR) = 0.97), living mostly alone (OR = 1.45), showing psychiatric problems (OR = 2.22), having additional treatments (other than BZD/Z; OR = 1.37), having long-lasting treatment (OR = 1.04), exhibiting significant relationship difficulties (OR = 1.96), committing transgressional behaviors to procure BZD/Z (OR = 2.70), and wanting to stop their consumption of BZD/Z (OR = 7.60). A latent class analysis, which was applied to sort out subgroups within dependent patients, identified two profiles according to the prevalence of dependence items: profile 1 (73%), "withdrawal syndrome when BZD/Z is stopped" (100%) and "previous unsuccessful attempts to stop consumption" (82%); and profile 2 (27%), "tolerance" (76%) and "intake in larger amounts or over a longer period than intended" (86%). BZD/Z dependence is frequent in the elderly population, and among dependent patients, we found two profiles corresponding to positive and negative conditioning of the psychoactive effects of BZD/Z. This study is registered as NCT01920581., (© 2020 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2020 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Objective: Ethanol and zopiclone are both sedating drugs that impair traffic relevant skills, but that show vast differences in epidemiological traffic risk. One explanation for this could be that they impair various kinds of skills differently, but this is less previously studied. The aim of this study was to compare effects of zopiclone and ethanol on a large battery of computerized psychomotor and cognitive tests according to different test classifications. Methods: Ethanol (50 grams), zopiclone 5 mg, zopiclone 10 mg or placebo was administered in a randomized trial with a cross-over design. Blood was sampled nine times after administration and analyzed for zopiclone and ethanol using fully validated methods. The computerized tests Connors Continuous Performance Test (CPT), Stockings of Cambridge (SOC) and choice reaction time (CRT) was performed at baseline and after administration. The three tests yielded fifteen different test components, which were categorized according to the three well-known behavior levels (automative behavior, control behavior and executive planning). Secondly, they were categorized into tests measuring "reaction time", "impulsivity" and "attention/cognition". Results: On all tests belonging to behavior level 1 and on all tests measuring "reaction time", more subjects were impaired by zopiclone than ethanol. On all tests measuring "impulsivity", more subjects were impaired by ethanol than zopiclone. Conclusion: Zopiclone and ethanol both lead to impairment, but have a different profile on what kind of tests and neurocognitive functions they mostly impair. This could be important in the understanding of the differences in traffic risk connected to these two drugs.

Background: Sleep disturbance is common in dementia and often treated with Z-drugs (zopiclone, zaleplon, and zolpidem). While some observational studies suggest that Z-drugs are associated with adverse events such as falls and fracture risks in older people, this has not been studied in dementia., Methods: We used data from 27,090 patients diagnosed with dementia between January 2000 and March 2016 from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episodes Statistics data in England. We compared adverse events for 3532 patients newly prescribed Z-drugs by time-varying dosage to (1) 1833 non-sedative-users with sleep disturbance; (2) 10,214 non-sedative-users with proximal GP consultation matched on age, sex, and antipsychotic use; and (3) 5172 patients newly prescribed benzodiazepines. We defined higher dose Z-drugs and benzodiazepines as prescriptions equivalent to ≥ 7.5 mg zopiclone or > 5 mg diazepam daily. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for incident fracture, hip fracture, fall, mortality, acute bacterial infection, ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack, and venous thromboembolism over a 2-year follow-up, adjusted for demographic- and health-related covariates., Results: The mean (SD) age of patients was 83 (7.7) years, and 16,802 (62%) were women. Of 3532 patients prescribed Z-drugs, 584 (17%) were initiated at higher doses. For patients prescribed higher dose Z-drugs relative to non-users with sleep disturbance, the HRs (95% confidence interval) for fractures, hip fractures, falls, and ischaemic stroke were 1.67 (1.13-2.46), 1.96 (1.16-3.31), 1.33 (1.06-1.66), and 1.88 (1.14-3.10), respectively. We observed similar associations when compared to non-sedative-users with proximal GP consultation. Minimal or inconsistent excess risks were observed at ≤ 3.75 mg zopiclone or equivalent daily, and for mortality, infection, and venous thromboembolism. We observed no differences in adverse events for Z-drugs compared to benzodiazepines, except lower mortality rates with Z-drugs (HR [95% confidence interval] of 0.73 [0.64-0.83])., Conclusions: Higher dose Z-drug use in dementia is associated with increased fracture and stroke risks, similar or greater to that for higher dose benzodiazepines. Higher dose Z-drugs should be avoided, if possible, in people living with dementia, and non-pharmacological alternatives preferentially considered. Prescriptions for higher dose Z-drugs in dementia should be regularly reviewed., Trial Registration: ENCePP e-register of studies, EUPAS18006.

Introduction: Ceftazidime-avibactam combines the established anti-pseudomonal cephalosporin, ceftazidime, with the novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, avibactam., Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in adults using pooled data from two phase II (NCT00690378, NCT00752219) and five phase III (NCT01499290, NCT01726023, NCT01644643, NCT01808093 and NCT01595438/NCT01599806) clinical studies., Methods: Safety data from seven multicentre, randomised, active-comparator studies were pooled by study group at the patient level for descriptive analyses, comprising patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including pyelonephritis, complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), or nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), treated with ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole or comparator., Results: In total, 4050 patients (ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole, n = 2024; comparator, n = 2026) were included in the pooled analysis. Adverse events (AEs) up to the last study visit occurred in 996 (49.2%) and 965 (47.6%) patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole and comparator, respectively. The most common AEs across treatment groups were diarrhoea, nausea, headache, vomiting and pyrexia. There were few discontinuations due to AEs (2.5% and 1.7% for ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole and comparators, respectively). Overall rates of serious AEs were 8.7% for ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole and 7.2% for comparators; respective rates of AEs with an outcome of death were 2.0% and 1.8%. AEs considered causally related to the study drug or procedures occurred in 10.7% and 9.6% of patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole and comparators; the most common drug-related AEs in both groups were diarrhoea, headache, nausea and increased alanine aminotransferase. No impact to the safety profile of ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole was found with regard to intrinsic factors, such as age or renal function at baseline, or extrinsic factors, such as geographical origin. Potentially clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters were infrequent with no trends or safety concerns identified., Conclusion: The observed safety profile of ceftazidime-avibactam across infection types is consistent with the established safety profile of ceftazidime monotherapy and no new safety findings were identified. This analysis supports the use of ceftazidime-avibactam as a treatment option in adults with cUTI, cIAI and NP, including VAP.

Nacubactam is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor with dual mechanisms of action as an inhibitor of serine β-lactamases (classes A and C and some class D) and an inhibitor of penicillin binding protein 2 in Enterobacteriaceae The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous nacubactam were evaluated in single- and multiple-ascending-dose, placebo-controlled studies. Healthy participants received single ascending doses of nacubactam of 50 to 8,000 mg, multiple ascending doses of nacubactam of 1,000 to 4,000 mg every 8 h (q8h) for up to 7 days, or nacubactam of 2,000 mg plus meropenem of 2,000 mg q8h for 6 days after a 3-day lead-in period. Nacubactam was generally well tolerated, with the most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) being mild to moderate complications associated with intravenous access and headache. There was no apparent relationship between drug dose and the pattern, incidence, or severity of AEs. No clinically relevant dose-related trends were observed in laboratory safety test results. No serious AEs, dose-limiting AEs, or deaths were reported. After single or multiple doses, nacubactam pharmacokinetics appeared linear, and exposure increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner across the dose range investigated. Nacubactam was excreted largely unchanged into urine. Coadministration of nacubactam with meropenem did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of either drug. These findings support the continued clinical development of nacubactam and demonstrate the suitability of meropenem as a potential β-lactam partner for nacubactam. (The studies described in this paper have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT02134834 [single ascending dose study] and NCT02972255 [multiple ascending dose study].)., (Copyright © 2020 Mallalieu et al.)

Background: The β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam can restore imipenem activity against imipenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative pathogens. We evaluated imipenem/relebactam for treating imipenem-nonsusceptible infections., Methods: Randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Hospitalized patients with hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia, complicated intraabdominal infection, or complicated urinary tract infection caused by imipenem-nonsusceptible (but colistin- and imipenem/relebactam-susceptible) pathogens were randomized 2:1 to 5-21 days imipenem/relebactam or colistin+imipenem. Primary endpoint: favorable overall response (defined by relevant endpoints for each infection type) in the modified microbiologic intent-to-treat (mMITT) population (qualifying baseline pathogen and ≥1 dose study treatment). Secondary endpoints: clinical response, all-cause mortality, and treatment-emergent nephrotoxicity. Safety analyses included patients with ≥1 dose study treatment., Results: Thirty-one patients received imipenem/relebactam and 16 colistin+imipenem. Among mITT patients (n = 21 imipenem/relebactam, n = 10 colistin+imipenem), 29% had Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores >15, 23% had creatinine clearance <60 mL/min, and 35% were aged ≥65 years. Qualifying baseline pathogens: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (77%), Klebsiella spp. (16%), other Enterobacteriaceae (6%). Favorable overall response was observed in 71% imipenem/relebactam and 70% colistin+imipenem patients (90% confidence interval [CI] for difference, -27.5, 21.4), day 28 favorable clinical response in 71% and 40% (90% CI, 1.3, 51.5), and 28-day mortality in 10% and 30% (90% CI, -46.4, 6.7), respectively. Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 10% of imipenem/relebactam and 31% of colistin+imipenem patients, drug-related AEs in 16% and 31% (no drug-related deaths), and treatment-emergent nephrotoxicity in 10% and 56% (P = .002), respectively., Conclusions: Imipenem/relebactam is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for carbapenem-nonsusceptible infections., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02452047., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background The prognostic impact of benzodiazepines has been unclear in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods and Results This was a historical observational cohort study. A total of 826 patients who had been hospitalized for HF and were being treated for insomnia with either benzodiazepines or Z-drugs (zolpidem, zopiclone, or eszopiclone), were enrolled and divided on the basis of their hypnotics: benzodiazepine group (n=488 [59.1%]) and Z group (n=338 [40.9%]). We compared the patient characteristics and postdischarge prognosis between the groups. The primary end points were rehospitalization for HF and cardiac death. The benzodiazepine group was older (age, 72.0 versus 69.0 years; P =0.010), had a higher prevalence of depression (17.4% versus 8.9%; P <0.001), and showed a higher use of loop diuretics (77.9% versus 67.8%; P =0.001). In the laboratory data, the benzodiazepine group demonstrated lower levels of hemoglobin (12.3 versus 13.0 g/dL; P =0.001), sodium (139.0 versus 140.0 mEq/L; P =0.018), and albumin (3.7 versus 3.9 g/dL; P =0.003). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that both end points were higher in the benzodiazepine group (rehospitalization for HF, log-rank P =0.001; cardiac death, log-rank P =0.043). Multiple Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that the use of benzodiazepines was an independent predictor of rehospitalization for HF (hazard ratio, 1.530; 95% CI, 1.025-2.284; P =0.038). Furthermore, rehospitalization for HF was higher in the benzodiazepine group after propensity score matching (log-rank P =0.036). Conclusions Benzodiazepine is associated with higher risk of rehospitalization for HF compared with Z-drugs in patients with HF.

Objectives: To investigate pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety (primary objectives) and efficacy (secondary objective) of the investigational monobactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination aztreonam/avibactam in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI)., Methods: This Phase 2a open-label, multicentre study (NCT02655419; EudraCT 2015-002726-39) enrolled adults with cIAI into sequential cohorts for 5-14 days treatment. Cohort 1 patients received an aztreonam/avibactam loading dose of 500/137 mg (30 min infusion), followed by maintenance doses of 1500/410 mg (3 h infusions) q6h; Cohort 2 received 500/167 mg (30 min infusion), followed by 1500/500 mg (3 h infusions) q6h. Cohort 3 was an extension of exposure at the higher dose regimen. Doses were adjusted for creatinine clearance of 31-50 mL/min (Cohorts 2 + 3). All patients received IV metronidazole 500 mg q8h. PK, safety and efficacy were assessed., Results: Thirty-four patients (Cohort 1, n = 16; Cohorts 2 + 3, n = 18) comprised the modified ITT (MITT) population. Mean exposures of aztreonam and avibactam in Cohorts 2 + 3 were consistent with those predicted to achieve joint PK/pharmacodynamic target attainment in >90% patients. Adverse events (AEs) were similar between cohorts. The most common AEs were hepatic enzyme increases [n = 9 (26.5%)] and diarrhoea [n = 5 (14.7%)]. Clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit overall were 20/34 (58.8%) (MITT) and 14/23 (60.9%) (microbiological-MITT population)., Conclusions: Observed AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of aztreonam monotherapy, with no new safety concerns identified. These data support selection of the aztreonam/avibactam 500/167 mg (30 min infusion) loading dose and 1500/500 mg (3 h infusions) maintenance dose q6h regimen, in patients with creatinine clearance >50 mL/min, for the Phase 3 development programme., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Background: The management of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase producing (KPC) infections represents a major challenge. Several safety and efficacy concerns are shared by available antibiotics used in KPC infections, leading to the occurrence of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs), with ceftazidime-avibactam possibly showing a more favourable risk-benefit profile. We investigated the potential impact of resistance on ADR reports in countries with different prevalence of KPC isolates (Italy vs. United Kingdom [UK]), and described safety profile of newer and older antibiotics used in KPC infections., Methods: Three spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) with different features (Italy, UK and worldwide FAERS) were used to describe safety profiles of colistin, meropenem, tigecycline, gentamicin and ceftazidime-avibactam in terms of System Organ Class and Preferred Term level. ADRs were plotted with prevalence of KPC isolates in Italy and UK. A comparison between before-after the KPC outbreak period (1999-2008 vs. 2009-2018) of overall and serious ADRs for selected antibiotics in each SRS was performed. Relationship between total and serious number of ADR reports per year and KPC isolates per year after KPC outbreak (2009-2017) was investigated for both Italy and UK., Results: A total of 16,329 ADR reports were collected in the three SRSs, with meropenem (42.6%) and gentamicin (36.9%) having the highest number of reports. Significant increase in total and serious ADR reports after the KPC outbreak compared to previous 10 years was found for colistin, meropenem and gentamicin (p < 0.01). No significant increase in tigecycline ADRs was reported in FAERS and UK database. Unexpected safety signals involving selected antibiotics were not detected. Significant positive relationship between overall and serious ADR reports and KPC isolates per year for both Italy (p < 0.01; p = 0.005) and UK (p = 0.032; p = 0.013) was found., Conclusion: KPC outbreak led to significant increase in ADRs to selected antibiotics, and a close relationship with antimicrobial resistance was found, both in countries with high and low resistance rate. New safety signals were not detected for selected agents. Active surveillance should be maintained to promptly identify unexpected safety issues.

Background: Antidepressants, opioids for non-cancer pain, gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin), benzodiazepines, and Z-drugs (zopiclone, zaleplon, and zolpidem) are commonly prescribed medicine classes associated with a risk of dependence or withdrawal. We aimed to review the evidence for these harms and estimate the prevalence of dispensed prescriptions, their geographical distribution, and duration of continuous receipt using all patient-linked prescription data in England., Methods: This was a mixed-methods public health review, comprising a rapid evidence assessment of articles (Jan 1, 2008, to Oct 3, 2018; with searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO, and the Cochrane and King's Fund libraries), an open call-for-evidence on patient experience and service evaluations, and a retrospective, patient-linked analysis of the National Health Service (NHS) Business Services Authority prescription database (April 1, 2015, to March 30, 2018) for all adults aged 18 years and over. Indirectly (sex and age) standardised rates (ISRs) were computed for all 195 NHS Clinical Commissioning Groups in England, containing 7821 general practices for the geographical analysis. We used publicly available mid-year (June 30) data on the resident adult population and investigated deprivation using the English Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintiles (quintile 1 least deprived, quintile 5 most deprived), with each patient assigned to the IMD quintile score of their general practitioner's practice for each year. Statistical modelling (adjusted incident rate ratios [IRRs]) of the number of patients who had a prescription dispensed for each medicine class, and the number of patients in receipt of a prescription for at least 12 months, was done by sex, age group, and IMD quintile., Findings: 77 articles on the five medicine classes were identified from the literature search and call-for-evidence. 17 randomised placebo-controlled trials (6729 participants) reported antidepressant-associated withdrawal symptoms. Almost all studies were rated of very low, low, or moderate quality. The focus of qualitative and other reports was on patients' experiences of long-term antidepressant use, and typically sudden onset, severe, and protracted withdrawal symptoms when medication was stopped. Between April 1, 2017, and March 31, 2018, 11·53 million individuals (26·3% of residents in England) had a prescription dispensed for at least one medicine class: antidepressants (7·26 million [16·6%]), opioids (5·61 million [12·8%]), gabapentinoids (1·46 million [3·3%]), benzodiazepines (1·35 million [3·1%]), and Z-drugs (0·99 million [2·3%]). For three of these medicine classes, more people had a prescription dispensed in areas of higher deprivation, with adjusted IRRs (referenced to quintile 1) ranging from 1·10 to 1·24 for antidepressants, 1·20 to 1·85 for opioids, and 1·21 to 1·85 for gabapentinoids across quintiles, and higher ISRs generally concentrated in the north and east of England. In contrast, the highest ISRs for benzodiazepines and Z-drugs were generally in the southwest, southeast, and east of England, with low ISRs in the north. Z-drugs were associated with increased deprivation, but only at the highest quintile (adjusted IRR 1·11 [95% CI 1·01-1·22]). For benzodiazepines, prescribing was reduced for people in quintiles 4 (0·90 [0·85-0·96]) and 5 (0·89 [0·82-0·97]). In March, 2018, for each of medicine class, about 50% of patients who had a prescription dispensed had done so continuously for at least 12 months, with the highest ISRs in the north and east. Long-term prescribing was associated with a gradient of increased deprivation., Interpretation: In 1 year over a quarter of the adult population in England had a prescription dispensed for antidepressants, opioids (for non-cancer pain), gabapentinoids, benzodiazepines, or Z-drugs. Long-term (>12 months) prescribing is common, despite being either not recommended by clinical guidelines or of doubtful efficacy in many cases. Enhanced national and local monitoring, better guidance for personalised care, and better doctor-patient decision making are needed., Funding: Public Health England., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Numerous observational studies suggest that hypnotics increase the risk of fractures, and long-acting hypnotics are suggested to be especially harmful. This study showed that the highest risk of fracture was found before start of treatment and remained after end of therapy, suggesting that the increased risk during treatment is influenced by other factors, such as underlying disease., Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations between the use of short-acting and long-acting hypnotics and the risk of fracture., Methods: Four cohorts were formed from all individuals living in Sweden aged ≥ 50 years in 2005 (n = 3,341,706). In the first cohort, individuals prescribed long-acting propiomazine (n = 233,609) were matched 1:1 with controls. In the second cohort, individuals prescribed short-acting z-drugs (zopiclone, zolpidem, and zaleplon, n = 591,136) were matched 1:1 with controls. The third and fourth cohorts consisted of full sibling pairs with discordant propiomazine (n = 83,594) and z-drug (n = 153,314) use, respectively., Results: The risk of fracture was greatest among users of hypnotics in the 90 days before the initiation of treatment, both for propiomazine (odds ratio [OR], 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.28-2.79) and z-drugs (OR, 4.10; 95% CI, 3.86-4.35) compared with that in matched controls. Furthermore, this risk was significantly reduced after the initiation of treatment with propiomazine (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.27-1.60) and z-drugs (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.56-1.80) and remained the first year following the last prescribed dose both for propiomazine (OR, 1.28, 95% CI, 1.21-1.36) and z-drugs (OR, 1.19, 95% CI, 1.16-1.23). The pattern was similar in the sibling cohorts, with the greatest risk of fracture seen in the 90 days before treatment with hypnotics was initiated., Conclusion: The use of short-acting and long-acting hypnotics is associated with an increased risk of fracture. This risk was highest before initiation of treatment and remained after end of therapy. The results suggest that the increased risk during treatment is influenced by other factors such as underlying disease.

Background: Ceftazidime-avibactam is effective and well tolerated in adults with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), but has not been evaluated in children with cUTI., Methods: This single-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, phase 2 study (NCT02497781) randomized children ≥3 months to <18 years with cUTI (3:1) to receive intravenous (IV) ceftazidime-avibactam or cefepime for ≥72 hours, with subsequent optional oral switch. Total treatment duration was 7-14 days. Primary objective was assessment of safety. Secondary objectives included descriptive efficacy and pharmacokinetics. A blinded observer determined adverse event (AE) causality and clinical outcomes up to the late follow-up visit (20-36 days after the last dose of IV/oral therapy)., Results: In total, 95 children received ≥1 dose of IV study drug (ceftazidime-avibactam, n = 67; cefepime, n = 28). The predominant baseline Gram-negative uropathogen was Escherichia coli (92.2%). AEs occurred in 53.7% and 53.6% patients in the ceftazidime-avibactam and cefepime groups, respectively. Serious AEs occurred in 11.9% (ceftazidime-avibactam) and 7.1% (cefepime) patients. One serious AE (ceftazidime-avibactam group) was considered drug related. In the microbiologic intent-to-treat analysis set, favorable clinical response rates >95% were observed for both groups at end-of-IV and remained 88.9% (ceftazidime-avibactam) and 82.6% (cefepime) at test-of-cure. Favorable per-patient microbiologic response at test-of-cure was 79.6% (ceftazidime-avibactam) and 60.9% (cefepime)., Conclusions: Ceftazidime-avibactam was well tolerated in children with cUTI, with a safety profile consistent with that of adults with cUTI and of ceftazidime alone, and appeared effective in children with cUTI due to Gram-negative pathogens.

Sulbactam-durlobactam is being developed for the treatment of infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii , including those caused by multidrug- and carbapenem-resistant isolates. This was a phase 1 study to evaluate the effects of various degrees of renal impairment, including subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD), on the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of durlobactam (also known as ETX2514) and sulbactam after single intravenous (i.v.) dose administration. For healthy subjects and those with mild or moderate renal impairment (RI), single 1,000-mg doses each of durlobactam and sulbactam via a 3-h i.v. infusion were administered, and for severe renal impairment, 500-mg doses were administered. For subjects with ESRD and HD, 500-mg i.v. doses each of durlobactam and sulbactam were administered post-HD and pre-HD, with a 1-week washout between doses. Among 34 subjects, decreasing renal function increased systemic exposure (peak plasma concentration [ C max ] and area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) to durlobactam and sulbactam in a generally linear manner. In healthy subjects and in those with mild or moderate renal impairment, the majority of durlobactam and sulbactam was excreted in the urine, while approximately 40% or less was excreted in urine in subjects with severe renal impairment or ESRD. In subjects with ESRD, hemodialysis was effective at removing both durlobactam and sulbactam from plasma. Renal impairment had no effect of the safety/tolerability profile of durlobactam and sulbactam. In summary, RI and ESRD had a predictable effect on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of durlobactam and sulbactam with no adverse effects on the safety/tolerability profile. Durlobactam and sulbactam are cleared to a similar extent by renal elimination and are impacted similarly by renal impairment. The results from this study have been used with population PK modeling and nonclinically derived PK/PD (pharmacodynamic) exposure targets to establish dosage recommendations for durlobactam and sulbactam in patients with various degrees of RI. The dosing regimen of durlobactam-sulbactam will require adjustment in patients with severe renal insufficiency and in those with ESRD., (Copyright © 2019 O’Donnell et al.)

Background: Ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole is effective in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) in adults. This single-blind, randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (NCT02475733) evaluated the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole in children with cIAI., Methods: Hospitalized children (≥3 months to <18 years) with cIAI were randomized 3:1 to receive intravenous ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole, or meropenem, for a minimum of 72 hours (9 doses), with optional switch to oral therapy thereafter for a total treatment duration of 7-15 days. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study, along with clinical and microbiologic outcomes, and pharmacokinetics. A blinded observer determined adverse event (AE) causality, and clinical outcomes up to the late follow-up visit., Results: Eighty-three children were randomized and received study drug (61 ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole and 22 meropenem); most (90.4%) had a diagnosis of appendicitis. Predominant Gram-negative baseline pathogens were Escherichia coli (79.7%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (33.3%); 2 E. coli isolates were ceftazidime-non-susceptible. AEs occurred in 52.5% and 59.1% of patients in the ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole and meropenem groups, respectively. Serious AEs occurred in 8.2% and 4.5% of patients, respectively; none was considered drug related. No deaths occurred. Favorable clinical/microbiologic responses were observed in ≥90% of patients in both treatment groups at end-of-intravenous treatment and test-of-cure visits., Conclusions: Ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to ceftazidime alone, and appeared effective in pediatric patients with cIAI due to Gram-negative pathogens, including ceftazidime-non-susceptible strains.

Background: Falls and related injuries are common among older people, and several drug classes are considered to increase fall risk., Aims: This study aimed to investigate the association between the use of certain drug classes and falls in older nursing home residents in Sweden, and relate these to different age groups., Methods: Information on falls that occurred in the previous year and regular use of possible fall risk drugs including non-benzodiazepine hypnotics (zopiclone and zolpidem) was collected from 331 nursing home residents during 2008-2011. Over the following 6 months, the occurrence of serious falls, requiring a physician visit or hospital care, was registered. Association between serious falls and drug use was compared between an older (≥ 85 years) and a younger group., Results: An increased fall risk (Downton Fall Risk Index ≥ 3) was found in 93% of the study subjects (aged 65-101 years). Baseline data indicated an association between falls that occurred in the previous year and regular use of non-benzodiazepine hypnotics (p = 0.005), but not with the other studied drug classes. During the following 6 months, an association between use of non-benzodiazepine hypnotics and serious falls in the older group (p = 0.017, odds ratio 4.311) was found. No association was found between the other studied drug classes and serious falls., Discussion: These results indicate an association between falls and the use of non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, compounds that previously have been considered generally well-tolerated in older people., Conclusions: Caution is advocated when using non-benzodiazepine hypnotics regularly in older people living in nursing homes.

Background: Although originally marketed as safe alternatives to the habit-forming benzodiazepines, growing numbers of zaleplon, zolpidem, and zopiclone ("Z-drugs") clinical concerns relating to their potential of abuse, dependence, and withdrawal have been reported over time. We aimed here at assessing these issues analyzing datasets of adverse drug reactions provided by the European Medicines Agency through the EudraVigilance system., Methods: Analyzing the adverse drug reactions databases of each Z-drug, descriptive analyses have been performed on cases and proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) computed., Results: An overall number of 33 240 (e.g., 23 420 zolpidem; 9283 zopiclone; and 537 zaleplon) misuse-, abuse-, dependence-, and withdrawal-related adverse drug reactions, corresponding to some 6246 unique patients given Z-drugs, were here identified. Cases were studied and described, including demographic characteristics and clinical data such as concomitant drugs, doses, routes of administration, and outcomes of the reactions (being fatalities recorded). Considering PRR values and in comparison with zopiclone, zolpidem was more frequently involved in both misuse/abuse and withdrawal issues. Zolpidem and zopiclone presented with the same dependence risk, but zopiclone was most involved in overdose adverse drug reactions. Compared with zaleplon, zopiclone presented higher dependence and overdose-related issues but slightly lower misuse/abuse and withdrawal PRR values., Conclusion: Current data may only represent a gross underestimate of the real prevalence of Z-drug misuse. Caution should be exercised when prescribing those molecules, especially for patients with psychiatric illnesses and/or history of drug abuse. We recommend the need to invest in proactive pharmacovigilance activities to better and promptly detect, understand, and prevent any possible misuse potential of prescribed medications., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP.)

Long-term use of benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine receptor agonists is widespread, although guidelines recommend short-term use. Only few controlled studies have characterized the effect of discontinuation of their chronic use on sleep and quality of life. We studied perceived sleep and quality of life in 92 older (age 55-91 years) outpatients with primary insomnia before and after withdrawal from long-term use of zopiclone, zolpidem or temazepam (BZDA). BZDA was withdrawn during 1 month, during which the participants received psychosocial support and blindly melatonin or placebo. A questionnaire was used to study perceived sleep and quality of life before withdrawal, and 1 month and 6 months later. 89 participants completed the 6-month follow-up. As melatonin did not improve withdrawal, all participants were pooled and then separated based solely on the withdrawal results at 6 months (34 Withdrawers. 55 Nonwithdrawers) for this secondary analysis. At 6 months, the Withdrawers had significantly (P < 0.05) shorter sleep-onset latency and less difficulty in initiating sleep than at baseline and when compared to Nonwithdrawers. Compared to baseline, both Withdrawers and Nonwithdrawers had at 6 months significantly (P < 0.05) less fatigue during the morning and daytime. Stress was alleviated more in Withdrawers than in Nonwithdrawers (P < 0.05). Satisfaction with life and expected health 1 year later improved (P < 0.05) in Withdrawers. In conclusion, sleep disturbances, daytime fatigue and impaired quality of life may resolve within 6 months of BZDA withdrawal. These results encourage withdrawal from chronic use of benzodiazepine-type hypnotics, particularly in older subjects., (© 2018 Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society).)

Background: Non-medical use of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs is common; however, there is limited information available on the extent of harm related to this in Europe, as well as the relationship between misuse and availability., Aim: To describe presentations to the emergency department in Europe related to the recreational use of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs and compare regional differences in these presentations with legal drug sales of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs within each country., Methods: Emergency department presentations with recreational misuse of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs were obtained from the Euro-DEN dataset for the period from October 2013 to September 2015; data extracted included demographics, clinical features, reported coused drugs, and outcome data. Sales figures obtained by QuintilesIMS™ (Atlanta, Georgia) were used to compare regional differences in the proportion of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in the emergency department presentations and legal drug sales across Europe., Results: Over the 2 years, there were 2119 presentations to the Euro-DEN project associated with recreational use of benzodiazepines and/or Z-drugs (19.3% of all Euro-DEN presentations). Presentations with 25 different benzodiazepines and Z-drugs were registered in all countries, most (1809/2340 registered benzodiazepines and Z-drugs, 77.3%) of which were prescription drugs. In 24.9%, the benzodiazepine was not specified. Where the benzodiazepine/Z-drug was known, the most frequently used benzodiazepines and Z-drugs were respectively clonazepam (29.5% of presentations), diazepam (19.9%), alprazolam (11.7%), and zopiclone (9.4%). The proportions of types of benzodiazepines/Z-drugs related to ED-presentations varied between countries. There was a moderate (Spain, UK, Switzerland) to high (France, Ireland, Norway) positive correlation between ED presentations and sales data (Spearman Row's correlation 0.66-0.80, p < 0.005), with higher correlation in countries with higher ED presentation rates., Conclusion: Presentations to the emergency department associated with the non-medical use of benzodiazepines and/or Z-drugs are common, with variation in the benzodiazepines and/or Z-drugs between countries. There was a moderate to high correlation with sales data, with higher correlation in countries with higher ED presentation rates. However, this is not the only explanation for the variation in non-medical use and in the harm associated with the non-medical use of benzodiazepines/Z-drugs.

Background: Despite the high prevalence of insomnia in patients with advanced cancer, there are no randomized controlled trials on pharmacological interventions for insomnia in this group of patients. A variety of pharmacological agents is recommended to manage sleep disturbance for insomnia in the general population, but their efficacy and safety in adults with advanced cancer are not established. Thus, there is a need to evaluate the effectiveness of medications for insomnia in order to improve the evidence in patients with advanced cancer. One of the most used sleep medications at present in patients with cancer is zopiclone., Methods: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial. A total of 100 patients with metastatic cancer who report insomnia will be randomly allocated to zopiclone or placebo. The treatment duration with zopiclone/placebo is 6 consecutive nights. The primary endpoint is patient-reported sleep quality during the final study night (night 6) assessed on a numerical rating scale of 0-10, where 0 = Best sleep and 10 = Worst possible sleep. Secondary endpoints include the mean patient-reported total sleep time and sleep onset latency during the final study night (night 6)., Discussion: Results from this study on treatment of insomnia in advanced cancer will contribute to clinical decision-making and improve the treatment of sleep disturbance in this patient cohort., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02807922 . Registered on 21 June 2016.

WCK 5222 is a novel β-lactam-β-lactam-enhancer combination of cefepime (FEP) and zidebactam (ZID). ZID is a novel β-lactam enhancer with a dual action of binding to Gram-negative penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2) and β-lactamase inhibition. WCK 5222 is being developed as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of complicated multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogen infections. We investigated the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of WCK 5222 in 48 subjects based on Cockcroft-Gault-estimated creatinine clearance (CL CR ). We enrolled mild ( n = 6; CL CR , 60 to <90 ml/min), moderate ( n = 6; CL CR , 30 to <60 ml/min), and severe ( n = 6; CL CR , <30 ml/min; not on dialysis) impairment, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD) ( n = 6), and matched normal controls ( n = 24; CL CR , ≥90 ml/min). Healthy control subjects and mild and moderate renal impairment subjects received a single 60-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 3 g WCK 5222 (2 g FEP/1 g ZID); severe renal impairment and HD subjects received a single 60-min i.v. infusion of 1.5 g WCK 5222 (1 g FEP plus 0.5 g ZID). Body and renal clearance decreased, and plasma half-life ( t 1/2 ) and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC 0-∞ [h µg/ml]) increased in a graded relationship with severity of renal impairment for both FEP and ZID. Our findings suggest that dose adjustments for WCK 5222 will be required according to the degree of renal impairment. Overall, WCK 5222 (FEP-ZID) was found to be safe and well tolerated in subjects with normal and impaired renal function. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02942810.)., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.)

Background: Experience in real clinical practice with ceftazidime/avibactam is limited, and there are even fewer data on infections due to OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae., Methods: We designed an observational study of a prospectively collected cohort of adult patients receiving ceftazidime/avibactam in our centre. Only the first treatment course of each patient was analysed. Efficacy and safety were evaluated as 14 and 30 day mortality, recurrence rate at 90 days, resistance development and occurrence of adverse effects., Results: Fifty-seven patients were treated with ceftazidime/avibactam. The median age was 64 years (range 26-86), 77% were male and the median Charlson index was 3. The most frequent sources of infection were intra-abdominal (28%), followed by respiratory (26%) and urinary (25%). Thirty-one (54%) patients had a severe infection (defined as presence of sepsis or septic shock). Most patients received ceftazidime/avibactam as monotherapy (81%) and the median duration of treatment was 13 days. Mortality at 14 days was 14%. In multivariate analysis, the only mortality risk factor was INCREMENT-CPE score >7 (HR 11.7, 95% CI 4.2-20.6). There was no association between mortality and monotherapy with ceftazidime/avibactam. The recurrence rate at 90 days was 10%. Ceftazidime/avibactam resistance was not detected in any case and only two patients developed adverse events related to treatment., Conclusions: Ceftazidime/avibactam shows promising results, even in monotherapy, for the treatment of patients with severe infections due to OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae and limited therapeutic options. The emergence of resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was not observed.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of XL647 and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral XL647 once-daily using intermittent or continuous dosing schedules., Methods: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were enrolled in successive cohorts to receive escalating dose levels of oral once-daily XL647 using two different dosing schedules: 5 consecutive days of every 14-day cycle (study XL647-001) or continuously over 28-day cycles (study XL647-002). PK sampling was performed to determine C max , and AUC. Patients remained on study until progressive disease or unacceptable AEs., Results: In XL647-001, 42 individuals were enrolled across 9 dose levels. The most frequently occurring drug-related AEs were diarrhea, nausea, rash, and fatigue. Expansion of the 4.68 mg/kg cohort to 6 patients occurred without further dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and this was considered the MTD. In XL647-002, 31 patients were enrolled across 5 dose levels. A DLT of grade 3 pneumonitis occurred in 1/6 patients at 300 mg, which was declared the MTD. The most common AEs included grade 1/2 rash, diarrhea, fatigue, dysgeusia, and QTc prolongation. Levels of pharmacodynamic plasma markers were not consistently changed after XL647 and no conclusions could be drawn with this limited data set., Conclusions: For oral XL647, the MTD was 4.68 mg/kg or 350 mg fixed dose when administered once-daily for 5 consecutive days of every 14-day cycle and was 300 mg when administered once-daily continuously. XL647 was well tolerated at doses up to the MTD.

Background: Ceftazidime/avibactam is approved for complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections (UTIs) based on results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data regarding its effectiveness in treating hospital-acquired infections or resistant pathogens have not been systematically compiled., Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis including RCTs evaluating ceftazidime/avibactam versus comparator for the treatment of any infection. Primary outcome was 30 day all-cause mortality. Subgroups of hospital-acquired infections and specific resistance phenotypes were planned., Results: Seven publications (eight trials, 4093 patients) were included, reporting a baseline ∼25% of ESBL-carrying Enterobacteriaceae. No significant difference between ceftazidime/avibactam and comparator (mostly carbapenem) was demonstrated for 30 day all-cause mortality, late follow-up mortality and clinical response [relative risk (RR) 1.10, 95% CI 0.70-1.72, P = 0.69; RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.87-1.76, P = 0.25; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.01, P = 0.21, respectively, without significant heterogeneity]. Higher microbiological response rate was demonstrated with ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with UTI (RR 1.14, 1.0-1.29, P = 0.05, I2 = 51%). No significant difference in clinical response was demonstrated for patients with ceftazidime-resistant pathogens (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94-1.10, P = 0.66, I2 = 0%). Results for other subgroups of resistant pathogens or hospital-acquired infection were not available. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were significantly more common with ceftazidime/avibactam (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.00-1.54, P = 0.05, I2 = 0%)., Conclusions: Ceftazidime/avibactam is clinically and microbiologically as effective as carbapenems for treatment of infections in a setting of ∼25% ESBL-carrying Enterobacteriaceae. Safety of the drug should be further evaluated owing to a higher rate of SAEs compared with carbapenems. Further studies should assess the drug's effectiveness in the treatment of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Hypnotic use in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is contraindicated due to safety concerns. Recent studies indicate that single-night hypnotic use worsens hypoxaemia in some and reduces OSA severity in others depending on differences in pathophysiology. However, longer clinical trial data are lacking. This study aimed to determine the effects of 1 month of zopiclone on OSA severity, sleepiness and alertness in patients with low-moderate respiratory arousal thresholds without major overnight hypoxaemia.69 participants completed a physiology screening night with an epiglottic catheter to quantify arousal threshold. 30 eligible patients (apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) 22±11 events·h -1 ) then completed standard in-laboratory polysomnography (baseline) and returned for two additional overnight sleep studies (nights 1 and 30) after receiving either nightly zopiclone (7.5 mg) or placebo during a 1-month, double-blind, randomised, parallel trial (ANZCTR identifier ANZCTRN12613001106729).The change in AHI from baseline to night 30 was not different between zopiclone versus placebo groups (-5.9±10.2 versus -2.4±5.5 events·h -1 ; p=0.24). Similarly, hypoxaemia, next-day sleepiness and driving simulator performance were not different.1 month of zopiclone does not worsen OSA severity, sleepiness or alertness in selected patients without major overnight hypoxaemia. As the first study to assess the effect of a hypnotic on OSA severity and sleepiness beyond single-night studies, these findings provide important safety data and insight into OSA pathophysiology., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: S.G. Carter reports grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC; grant 1042493), and NeuroSleep, a NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence (grant 1060992), personal fees (Postgraduate Research Top-up Scholarship) from NeuroSleep, a NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence and personal fees (Supplementary Scholarship) from Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), during the conduct of the study; and personal fees for part-time employment from ResSleep, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J.C. Carberry reports grants from the NHMRC (grant 1042493) and NeuroSleep, a NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence (grant 1060992), during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: G. Cho reports grants from the NHMRC (grant 1042493) and NeuroSleep, a NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence (grant 1060992), during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: L.P. Fisher reports grants from the NHMRC (grant 1042493) and NeuroSleep, a NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence (grant 1060992), during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: C.M. Rollo reports grants from the NHMRC (grant 1042493) and NeuroSleep, a NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence (grant 1060992), during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: D.J. Stevens reports grants from the NHMRC (grant 1042493) and NeuroSleep, a NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence (grant 1060992), during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: R.R. Grunstein reports grants the NHMRC (grant 1042493) and NeuroSleep, a NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence (grant 1060992), during the conduct of the study, and personal fees for local advisory board activity from Merck and Teva, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: D.J. Eckert reports grants from the NHMRC (grant 1042493 and fellowship 1116942) and NeuroSleep, a NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence (grant 1060992), during the conduct of the study, and grants from Commonwealth Government of Australia Cooperative Research Centre Grant (industry partner Oventus Medical) and personal fees for advisory board activities and consultancy from Bayer, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A.L. D'Rozario reports grants from the NHMRC (grant 1042493), and NeuroSleep, a NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence (grant 1060992), during the conduct of the study., (Copyright ©ERS 2018.)

Background: Studies on persistence of benzodiazepine agonist (BZDA) withdrawal in older outpatients are few, and few studies on long-term persistence over years have yet been published. To describe the persistence of temazepam, zolpidem, and zopiclone (BZDA) withdrawal among older outpatients at 3 years from the beginning of withdrawal, as well as any changes in use of other medications., Methods: 92 outpatients (≥55 years) with primary insomnia, long-term BZDA use as hypnotics (mean duration of BZDA use 9.9 ± 6.2 years), and willingness to withdraw from BZDAs each received either melatonin or a placebo nightly for one month. During this period, BZDAs were meant to be gradually withdrawn. Sleep hygiene counselling and psychosocial support were provided. Three years later, use of BZDAs and other medications was determined by interview and confirmed from medical records., Results: Of the original 92 outpatients, 83 (90%) participated in the 3-year survey (mean follow-up 3.3 ± 0.2 years). The number of BZDA-free participants decreased from 34 (37%) at 6 months to 26 (28%; intention-to-treat) at 3 years, that of irregular BZDA users decreased from 44 (48%) at 6 months to 27 (29%) at 3 years, while that of regular users increased from 11 (12%) at 6 months to 30 (33%) at 3 years (P = 0.001). Those who were regular BZDA users at 3 years had at baseline (before withdrawal) higher BMI (P = 0.001) than did other participants. At 3 years, the total number of medications remained unchanged for non-users (P = 0.432), but increased for the irregular (P = 0.011) and regular users (P = 0.026) compared to baseline. At 3 years, compared to baseline, use of antidepressants, dopamine agonists, melatonin, and NSAIDs/paracetamol was significantly more common in the whole cohort, but their use did not differ between the BZDA-user subgroups. Randomization to melatonin or placebo during BZDA withdrawal was unrelated to BZDA-withdrawal result., Conclusions: At 3 years after withdrawal, the number of BZDA-free participants had decreased, but still one-third of the subjects remained BZDA-free, and one-third had reduced their use. Successful BZDA withdrawal did not lead to any increase in total number of medications; use of symptomatic medications in the whole cohort, however, did increase.

Ceftazidime-avibactam (Zavicefta ® ) is an intravenously administered combination of the third-generation cephalosporin ceftazidime and the novel, non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam. In the EU, ceftazidime-avibactam is approved for the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) [including pyelonephritis], complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) [including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)], and other infections caused by aerobic Gram-negative organisms in patients with limited treatment options. This article discusses the in vitro activity and pharmacological properties of ceftazidime-avibactam, and reviews data on the agent's clinical efficacy and tolerability relating to use in these indications, with a focus on the EU label. Ceftazidime-avibactam has excellent in vitro activity against many important Gram-negative pathogens, including many extended-spectrum β-lactamase-, AmpC-, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase- and OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae and drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates; it is not active against metallo-β-lactamase-producing strains. The clinical efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of cUTI, cIAI and HAP (including VAP) in adults was demonstrated in pivotal phase III non-inferiority trials with carbapenem comparators. Ceftazidime-avibactam treatment was associated with high response rates at the test-of-cure visit in patients with infections caused by ceftazidime-susceptible and -nonsusceptible Gram-negative pathogens. Ceftazidime-avibactam was generally well tolerated, with a safety and tolerability profile consistent with that of ceftazidime alone and that was generally typical of the injectable cephalosporins. Thus, ceftazidime-avibactam represents a valuable new treatment option for these serious and difficult-to-treat infections.

Objective: zolpidem, zopiclone, eszopiclone and zaleplon, also known as 'Z-drugs', are commonly used as alternatives to benzodiazepines (BZDs) to treat insomnia. Z-drugs are often perceived as safer than BZDs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the association between Z-drugs and fracutres, falls and injuries., Methods: a systematic review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and ClinicalTials.gov. Pooled effect-sizes were calculated comparing Z-drugs users with non-users, using fixed and random-effect models with corresponding 95% confidence of intervals (CI)., Results: we identified 14 eligible studies reporting on the association between Z-drugs and outcomes of interest. Z-Drugs were associated with a statistically significant increased risk for fractures, with evidence of considerable heterogeneity (OR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.42-1.87; I2 = 90%; n = 830,877). Likewise, there was a trend suggesting a 2-fold increase in the odds for falls, however, this result was not statistically significant and there was evidence of considerable heterogeneity (OR = 2.40; 95% CI: 0.92-6.27; I2 = 95%; n = 19,505). In an analysis assessing the risk for injuries following exposure to zolpidem we found a statistically significant increased risk of injuries, with no evidence of heterogeneity (OR = 2.05; CI 95%: 1.95-2.15; I2 = 0; n = 160,502). Results were similar in sensitivity analyses, including analyses restricted to studies of high-quality, studies with control groups suffering from insomnia, and with specific Z-drugs., Conclusion: our results indicate that Z-drugs are associated with an increased risk for fractures, and suggest a possible increased risk for falls and injuries as well. However, studies included were observational and susceptible to confounding. Physicians should consider these potential risks before prescribing these medications in older adults., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com)

Background: The efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam-a cephalosporin-β-lactamase inhibitor combination with in vitro activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-compared with colistin remains unknown., Methods: Patients initially treated with either ceftazidime-avibactam or colistin for CRE infections were selected from the Consortium on Resistance Against Carbapenems in Klebsiella and other Enterobacteriaceae (CRACKLE), a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Efficacy, safety, and benefit-risk analyses were performed using intent-to-treat analyses with partial credit and the desirability of outcome ranking approaches. The ordinal efficacy outcome was based on disposition at day 30 after starting treatment (home vs not home but not observed to die in the hospital vs hospital death). All analyses were adjusted for confounding using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)., Results: Thirty-eight patients were treated first with ceftazidime-avibactam and 99 with colistin. Most patients received additional anti-CRE agents as part of their treatment. Bloodstream (n = 63; 46%) and respiratory (n = 30; 22%) infections were most common. In patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam versus colistin, IPTW-adjusted all-cause hospital mortality 30 days after starting treatment was 9% versus 32%, respectively (difference, 23%; 95% bootstrap confidence interval, 9%-35%; P = .001). In an analysis of disposition at 30 days, patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam, compared with those treated within colistin, had an IPTW-adjusted probability of a better outcome of 64% (95% confidence interval, 57%-71%). Partial credit analyses indicated uniform superiority of ceftazidime-avibactam to colistin., Conclusions: Ceftazidime-avibactam may be a reasonable alternative to colistin in the treatment of K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing CRE infections. These findings require confirmation in a randomized controlled trial., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Hypnotics are contraindicated in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) because of concerns of pharyngeal muscle relaxation and delayed arousal worsening hypoxaemia. However, human data are lacking. This study aimed to determine the effects of three common hypnotics on the respiratory arousal threshold, genioglossus muscle responsiveness and upper airway collapsibility during sleep.21 individuals with and without OSA (18-65 years) completed 84 detailed sleep studies after receiving temazepam (10 mg), zolpidem (10 mg), zopiclone (7.5 mg) and placebo on four occasions in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial (ACTRN12612001004853).The arousal threshold increased with zolpidem and zopiclone versus placebo (mean±sd -18.3±10 and -19.1±9 versus -14.6±7 cmH 2 O; p=0.02 and p<0.001) but not with temazepam (-16.8±9 cmH 2 O; p=0.17). Genioglossus muscle activity during stable non-REM sleep and responsiveness during airway narrowing was not different with temazepam and zopiclone versus placebo but, paradoxically, zolpidem increased median muscle responsiveness three-fold during airway narrowing (median -0.15 (interquartile range -1.01 to -0.04) versus -0.05 (-0.29 to -0.03)% maximum EMG per cmH 2 O epiglottic pressure; p=0.03). The upper airway critical closing pressure did not change with any of the hypnotics.These doses of common hypnotics have differential effects on the respiratory arousal threshold but do not reduce upper airway muscle activity or alter airway collapsibility during sleep. Rather, muscle activity increases during airway narrowing with zolpidem., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside this article at erj.ersjournals.com, (Copyright ©ERS 2017.)

Background: Medication and psychotherapy treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) provide insufficient benefit for many patients. Substantial preclinical and clinical data indicate abnormalities in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, including signaling by corticotropin-releasing factor, in the pathophysiology of PTSD., Methods: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, fixed-dose clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of GSK561679, a corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 (CRF 1 receptor) antagonist in adult women with PTSD. The trial randomized 128 participants, of whom 96 completed the 6-week treatment period., Results: In both the intent-to-treat and completer samples, GSK561679 failed to show superiority over placebo on the primary outcome of change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale total score. Adverse event frequencies did not significantly differ between GSK561679- and placebo-treated subjects. Exploration of the CRF 1 receptor single nucleotide polymorphism rs110402 found that response to GSK561679 and placebo did not significantly differ by genotype alone. However, subjects who had experienced a moderate or severe history of childhood abuse and who were also GG homozygotes for rs110402 showed significant improvement after treatment with GSK561679 (n = 6) but not with placebo (n = 7) on the PTSD Symptom Scale-Self-Report., Conclusions: The results of this trial, the first evaluating a CRF 1 receptor antagonist for the treatment of PTSD, combined with other negative trials of CRF 1 receptor antagonists for major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and social anxiety disorder, suggest that CRF 1 receptor antagonists lack efficacy as monotherapy agents for these conditions., (Copyright © 2017 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare efficacy of pharmacotherapies for chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) based on comparisons to placebo using Bayesian network meta-analysis., Data Sources: We conducted searches (inception to May 2015) of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Central, as well as original data from authors or drug companies for the medications used for CIC., Study Selection: Phase IIB and phase III randomised, placebo-controlled trials (RCT) of ≥4 weeks' treatment for CIC in adults with Rome II or III criteria for functional constipation; trials included at least one of four end points., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two investigators independently evaluated all full-text articles that met inclusion criteria and extracted data for primary and secondary end points, risk of bias and quality of evidence., Outcomes: Primary end points were ≥3 complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM)/week and increase over baseline by ≥1 CSBM/week. Secondary end points were change from baseline (Δ b ) in the number of SBM/week and Δ b CSBM/week., Results: Twenty-one RCTs (9189 patients) met inclusion and end point criteria: 9 prucalopride, 3 lubiprostone, 3 linaclotide, 2 tegaserod, 1 each velusetrag, elobixibat, bisacodyl and sodium picosulphate (NaP). All prespecified end points were unavailable in four polyethylene glycol studies. Bisacodyl, NaP, prucalopride and velusetrag were superior to placebo for the ≥3 CSBM/week end point. No drug was superior at improving the primary end points on network meta-analysis. Bisacodyl appeared superior to the other drugs for the secondary end point, Δ b in number of SBM/week., Conclusions: Current drugs for CIC show similar efficacy. Bisacodyl may be superior to prescription medications for Δ b in the number of SBM/week in CIC., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)

Introduction: In France, an addictovigilance network is responsible for evaluating drug dependence, by drawing on pharmacoepidemiological studies, clinical studies and by assessing healthcare professionals' reports on problematic consumption., Methods: The aim of this study was to determine whether zolpidem and zopiclone have different dependence profiles, based on healthcare professionals' reports, and to identify various consumer dependence profiles among zolpidem users and among zopiclone users. Dependence in reports was assessed using the EGAP scale; a scale developed using the DSM diagnostic dependence criteria., Results: The comparison of dependence profiles for zolpidem and zopiclone showed differences both in total EGAP score and EGAP item positivity. The descriptive analysis showed that EGAP scores were higher for zolpidem than for zopiclone, suggesting more severe problematic consumption with zolpidem. For zolpidem 2 subpopulations of consumers were identified, with one subpopulation's consumption being more severe than the other, with a significantly higher total EGAP score and more harmful consequences. No subpopulation was highlighted for zopiclone., Conclusion: These results were in favour of a higher prevalence of physical and compulsive signs of dependence and of harmful consequences of dependence, with zolpidem than with zopiclone.