Search

Introduction: In sub-Saharan Africa, pregnant and postpartum women with mental health problems are often missed in healthcare systems. To address this, a practical and simple screening tool for maternal mental health should be available to primary healthcare workers. An important step toward having such a tool is to assess the existing tools and their effectiveness in primary care settings., Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, LILAC, CINAHL, Google Scholar, African Index Medicus, HINARI, and African Journals Online from inception to 31 January 2023, without language restriction. Reference lists of retrieved articles were reviewed and experts in the field were contacted for studies not captured by our searches. All retrieved records were collated in Endnote, de-duplicated, and exported to Rayyan for screening. Study selection and data extraction were done by at least two reviewers using a pre-tested flow chart and data extraction form. Disagreements between reviewers were resolved through discussion. We contacted primary authors for missing or insufficient information and conducted a content analysis of the psychometric properties of the tools., Results: In total, 1,181 studies were retrieved by our searches, of which 119 studies were included in this review. A total of 74 out of 119 studies (62%) were screened for depression during pregnancy and or the postpartum period. The Edinburg Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) were the most commonly used tools. In total, 12 studies reported specificity and sensitivity for tools for measuring depression (EPDS, PHQ-9, and Whooley) and psychological distress [Self Report Questionnaire (SRQ) and Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (KPDS)]. The average sensitivity and specificity of the EPDS reported were 75.5 and 76.5%, respectively, at a cut-off of ≥13. The EPDS appears to be the most acceptable, adaptable, user-friendly, and effective in screening for maternal mental health conditions during pregnancy and postpartum. However, the methodological approach varied for a particular tool, and documentation on the attributes was scanty., Conclusion: The EPDS was the most commonly used tool and considered as most acceptable, adaptable, user-friendly, and effective. Information on the performance and psychometric properties of the vast majority of screening tools was limited., Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022323558, identifier CRD42022323558 (PROSPERO)., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Gyimah, Agyepong, Owiredu, Awini, Yevoo, Ashinyo, Aye, Abbas, Cronin de Chavez, Mirzoev and Danso-Appiah.)

Introduction: Pregnancy and postpartum-related mental health problems pose serious public health threat to the society, but worryingly, neglected in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This review will assess the burden and distribution of maternal mental health (MMH) problems in SSA, with the aim to inform the implementation of context sensitive interventions and policies., Methods and Analysis: All relevant databases, grey literature and non-database sources will be searched. PubMed, LILAC, CINAHL, SCOPUS and PsycINFO, Google Scholar, African Index Medicus, HINARI, African Journals Online and IMSEAR will be searched from inception to 31 May 2023, without language restriction. The reference lists of articles will be reviewed, and experts contacted for additional studies missed by our searches. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be done independently by at least two reviewers and any discrepancies will be resolved through discussion between the reviewers. Binary outcomes (prevalence and incidence) of MMH problems will be assessed using pooled proportions, OR or risk ratio and mean difference for continuous outcomes; all will be presented with their 95% CIs. Heterogeneity will be investigated graphically for overlapping CIs and statistically using the I 2 statistic and where necessary subgroup analyses will be performed. Random-effects model meta-analysis will be conducted when heterogeneity is appreciable, otherwise fixed-effect model will be used. The overall level of evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation., Ethics and Dissemination: Although no ethical clearance or exemption is needed for a systematic review, this review is part of a larger study on maternal mental health which has received ethical clearance from the Ethics Review Committee of the Ghana Health Service (GHS-ERC 012/03/20). Findings of this study will be disseminated through stakeholder forums, conferences and peer review publications., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42021269528., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)