Search

Copyright of Nordic Magazine for Health Research / Nordisk Tidsskrift for Helseforskning is the property of Universitetet i Tromsoe and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Norwegian Journal of Clinical Nursing / Sykepleien Forskning is the property of Sykepleien Forskning and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aim: The aim was to explore how nurse mentors experience the assessment of nursing students in clinical placements at hospitals and in municipal health care. Design: The study is qualitative with an explorative and descriptive design. Methods: Based on an interview guide, we conducted 19 individual qualitative interviews and four focus group interviews with nurse mentors from various levels and fields of nursing education at a Norwegian university. Results: Feedback in and on action was an integrated part of the formative assessment. In the summative assessment, where the university lecturer also participates, the nurse mentors perceived their role as passive. A disturbing finding was that divergent views on the student's competence sometimes occurred in these situations, thus challenging the credibility of the student assessment. Perceptions of nursing values and concerns embedded in nursing practice as collective criteria appear to have an impact on the mentors' assessment of the nursing students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Professional development is often connected with making improvements that affect patient experiences, needs, and safety. Competency maintenance, professional development, and updating skills and knowledge are demanded at workplaces, especially hospitals. The aim of this study was to examine Norwegian nurse anesthetist perceptions of professional development and research in the workplace. A qualitative method was used, which included individual interviews with a strategic sample of 14 nurse anesthetists working in anesthesia departments. A grounded theory approach was used for analysis. From the data analysis, 1 main category, "climate of professional development and research," and 2 subcategories," professional development and production" and "professional development and management," were elicited. The results show that nurse anesthetists want to maintain their knowledge so they can deliver good-quality care for the patient. The current emphasis on production seems to be a negative factor for a good climate of professional development and research. Attitudes among managers and nurses were other factors that emerged as affecting the professional environment. Both nurse anesthetists' and anesthesia department managers have the potential to improve and increase knowledge, encourage motivation, and facilitate sufficient organization so that greater focus will be given to professional development and research in nurse anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Perceived stress of nurse anesthetists and their work environment has been the focus of several previous studies. This article presents a study of different factors that may contribute positively or negatively to the work environment of nurse anesthetists in Norway. It focuses on factors that nurse anesthetists perceive as health promoting at work and indicates how a healthy work environment can be created. A qualitative method was used, which included interviews with a strategic sample of 14 nurse anesthetists working in anesthesia departments. The data were collected in 2008. A grounded theory approach was used as the method of analysis. From the data analysis emerged 1 core category, Collaboration for better or worse-the fate of nurse anesthetists at the workplace. There were also 3 categories, Management as organizer of conditions, Well-being in an operating theater, and Clarity of role, and a number of subcategories. Collaboration through teamwork emerged as a crucial factor in the work environment of nurse anesthetists, while management was considered an important factor for creating a healthy work environment. Production pressure and communication difficulties were perceived as negative for the work environment. Management should therefore be actively involved and oriented toward creating favorable conditions for collaboration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]