1. Differences in Provider Hepatitis C Virus Screening Recommendations by Patient Risk Status
- Author
-
Alfu Laily, Robert Duncan, Kaitlyn M. Gabhart, Lauren D. Nephew, Shannon M. Christy, Susan T. Vadaparampil, Anna R. Giuliano, and Monica L. Kasting
- Subjects
Average risk ,Hepatitis C virus ,High risk ,Providers ,Recommendation ,Screening ,Medicine - Abstract
Providers’ recommendation is among the strongest predictors to patients engaging in preventive care. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare providers’ Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) screening recommendation quality between high-risk and average-risk patients to determine if providers are universally recommending HCV screening, regardless of risk behaviors. This cross-sectional survey of 284 Indiana providers in 2020 assessed provider characteristics, HCV screening recommendation practices (strength, presentation, frequency, timeliness), self-efficacy, and barriers to recommending HCV screening. T-test and Chi-square compared recommendation practices for high-risk and average-risk patients. Prevalence ratios were calculated for variables associated with HCV recommendation strength comparing high-risk and average-risk patients. Logistic regression analyses examined factors associated with HCV recommendation strength for high- and average-risk patients, with odds ratios. Compared to average-risk patients, high-risk patients received higher proportion of HCV recommendations that were strong (70.4 % v. 42.4 %), routine (61.9 % v. 55.6 %), frequent (37.7 % v. 28 %), and timely (74.2 % v. 54.9 %) (P-values
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF