Search

Background: The delineation of clinical target volumes (CTVs) for radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer is complex and varies based on the location and extent of disease. Purpose: The current study aimed to develop an auto‐contouring solution following one protocol guidelines (NRG‐HN001) that can be adjusted to meet other guidelines, such as RTOG‐0225 and the 2018 International guidelines. Methods: The study used 2‐channel 3‐dimensional U‐Net and nnU‐Net framework to auto‐contour 27 normal structures in the head and neck (H&N) region that are used to define CTVs in the protocol. To define the CTV‐Expansion (CTV1 and CTV2) and CTV‐Overall (the outer envelope of all the CTV contours), we used adjustable morphological geometric landmarks and mimicked physician interpretation of the protocol rules by partially or fully including select anatomic structures. The results were evaluated quantitatively using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean surface distance (MSD) and qualitatively by independent reviews by two H&N radiation oncologists. Results: The auto‐contouring tool showed high accuracy for nasopharyngeal CTVs. Comparison between auto‐contours and clinical contours for 19 patients with cancers of various stages showed a DSC of 0.94 ± 0.02 and MSD of 0.4 ± 0.4 mm for CTV‐Expansion and a DSC of 0.83 ± 0.02 and MSD of 2.4 ± 0.5 mm for CTV‐Overall. Upon independent review, two H&N physicians found the auto‐contours to be usable without edits in 85% and 75% of cases. In 15% of cases, minor edits were required by both physicians. Thus, one physician rated 100% of the auto‐contours as usable (use as is, or after minor edits), while the other physician rated 90% as usable. The second physician required major edits in 10% of cases. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the ability of an auto‐contouring tool to reliably delineate nasopharyngeal CTVs based on protocol guidelines. The tool was found to be clinically acceptable by two H&N radiation oncology physicians in at least 90% of the cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background and purpose Various deep learning auto-segmentation (DLAS) models have been proposed, some of which have been commercialized. However, the issue of performance degradation is notable when pretrained models are deployed in the clinic. This study aims to enhance precision of a popular commercial DLAS product in rectal cancer radiotherapy by localized fine-tuning, addressing challenges in practicality and generalizability in real-world clinical settings. Materials and methods A total of 120 Stage II/III mid-low rectal cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled and divided into three datasets: training (n = 60), external validation (ExVal, n = 30), and generalizability evaluation (GenEva, n = 30) datasets respectively. The patients in the training and ExVal dataset were acquired on the same CT simulator, while those in GenEva were on a different CT simulator. The commercial DLAS software was first localized fine-tuned (LFT) for clinical target volume (CTV) and organs-at-risk (OAR) using the training data, and then validated on ExVal and GenEva respectively. Performance evaluation involved comparing the LFT model with the vendor-provided pretrained model (VPM) against ground truth contours, using metrics like Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th Hausdorff distance (95HD), sensitivity and specificity. Results LFT significantly improved CTV delineation accuracy (p

This study aimed to determine the relationship between geometric and dosimetric agreement metrics in head and neck (H&N) cancer radiotherapy plans. A total 287 plans were retrospectively analyzed, comparing auto-contoured and clinically used contours using a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), surface DSC (sDSC), and Hausdorff distance (HD). Organs-at-risk (OARs) with ≥200 cGy dose differences from the clinical contour in terms of Dmax (D0.01cc) and Dmean were further examined against proximity to the planning target volume (PTV). A secondary set of 91 plans from multiple institutions validated these findings. For 4995 contour pairs across 19 OARs, 90% had a DSC, sDSC, and HD of at least 0.75, 0.86, and less than 7.65 mm, respectively. Dosimetrically, the absolute difference between the two contour sets was <200 cGy for 95% of OARs in terms of Dmax and 96% in terms of Dmean. In total, 97% of OARs exhibiting significant dose differences between the clinically edited contour and auto-contour were within 2.5 cm PTV regardless of geometric agreement. There was an approximately linear trend between geometric agreement and identifying at least 200 cGy dose differences, with higher geometric agreement corresponding to a lower fraction of cases being identified. Analysis of the secondary dataset validated these findings. Geometric indices are approximate indicators of contour quality and identify contours exhibiting significant dosimetric discordance. For a small subset of OARs within 2.5 cm of the PTV, geometric agreement metrics can be misleading in terms of contour quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: Various deep learning auto-segmentation (DLAS) models have been proposed, some of which have been commercialized. However, the issue of performance degradation is notable when pretrained models are deployed in the clinic. This study aims to enhance precision of a popular commercial DLAS product in rectal cancer radiotherapy by localized fine-tuning, addressing challenges in practicality and generalizability in real-world clinical settings. Materials and methods: A total of 120 Stage II/III mid-low rectal cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled and divided into three datasets: training (n = 60), external validation (ExVal, n = 30), and generalizability evaluation (GenEva, n = 30) datasets respectively. The patients in the training and ExVal dataset were acquired on the same CT simulator, while those in GenEva were on a different CT simulator. The commercial DLAS software was first localized fine-tuned (LFT) for clinical target volume (CTV) and organs-at-risk (OAR) using the training data, and then validated on ExVal and GenEva respectively. Performance evaluation involved comparing the LFT model with the vendor-provided pretrained model (VPM) against ground truth contours, using metrics like Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th Hausdorff distance (95HD), sensitivity and specificity. Results: LFT significantly improved CTV delineation accuracy (p < 0.05) with LFT outperforming VPM in target volume, DSC, 95HD and specificity. Both models exhibited adequate accuracy for bladder and femoral heads, and LFT demonstrated significant enhancement in segmenting the more complex small intestine. We did not identify performance degradation when LFT and VPM models were applied in the GenEva dataset. Conclusions: The necessity and potential benefits of LFT DLAS towards institution-specific model adaption is underscored. The commercial DLAS software exhibits superior accuracy once localized fine-tuned, and is highly robust to imaging equipment changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Create a comprehensive automated solution for pediatric and adult VMAT-CSI including contouring, planning, and plan check to reduce planning time and improve plan quality. Methods: Seventy-seven previously treated CSI patients (age, 2-67 years) were used for creation of an auto-contouring model to segment 25 organs at risk (OARs). The auto-contoured OARs were evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95), and a qualitative ranking by one physician and one physicist (scale: 1-acceptable, 2-minor edits, 3-major edits). The auto-planning script was developed using the Varian Eclipse Scripting API and tested with 20 patients previously treated with either low-dose VMAT-CSI (12 Gy) or high-dose VMAT-CSI (36 Gy + 18 Gy boost). Clinically relevant metrics, planning time, and blinded physician review were used to evaluate significance of differences between the auto and manual plans. Finally, the plan preparation for treatment and plan check processes were automated to improve efficiency and safety of VMAT-CSI. Results: The auto-contours achieved an average DSC of 0.71 ± 0.15, HD95 of 4.81 ± 4.68, and reviewers' ranking of 1.22 ± 0.39, indicating close to "acceptable-as-is" contours. Compared to the manual CSI plans, the auto-plans for both dose regimens achieved statistically significant reductions in body V50% and Dmean for parotids, submandibular, and thyroid glands. The variance in the dosimetric parameters decreased for the auto-plans as compared to the manual plans indicating better plan consistency. From the blinded review, the auto-plans were marked as equivalent or superior to the manual-plans 88.3% of the time. The required time for the auto-contouring and planning was consistently between 1-2 hours compared to an estimated 5-6 hours for manual contouring and planning. Conclusions: Reductions in contouring and planning time without sacrificing plan quality were obtained using the developed auto-planning process. The auto-planning scripts and documentation will be made freely available to other institutions and clinics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose/Objective (s): Due to manual OAR contouring challenges, various automatic contouring solutions have been introduced. Historically, common clinical auto-segmentation algorithms used were atlas-based, which required maintaining a library of self-made contours. Searching the collection was computationally intensive and could take several minutes to complete. Deep learning approaches have shown significant benefits compared to atlas-based methods in improving segmentation accuracy and efficiency in auto-segmentation algorithms. This work represents the first multi-institutional study to describe and evaluate an AI algorithm for the auto-segmentation of organs at risk (OARs) based on a deep image-to-image network (DI2IN). Materials/Methods: The AI-Rad Companion Organs RT (AIRC) algorithm(Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) uses a two-step approach for segmentation. In the first step, the target organ region in the optimal input image is extracted using a trained deep reinforcement learning network (DRL), which is then used as input to create the contours in the second step based on DI2IN. The study was initially designed as a prospective single-center evaluation. The automated contours generated by AIRC were evaluated by three experienced board-certified radiation oncologists using a four-point scale where 4 is clinically usable and 1 requires re-contouring. After seeing favorable results in a single-center pilot study, we decided to expand the study to six additional institutions, encompassing eight additional evaluators for a total of 11 physician evaluators across seven institutions. Results: One hundred and fifty-six patients and 1366 contours were prospectively evaluated. The five most commonly contoured organs were the lung (136 contours, average rating = 4.0), spinal cord (106 contours, average rating = 3.1), eye globe (80 contours, average rating = 3.9), lens (77 contours, average rating = 3.9), and optic nerve (75 contours, average rating = 4.0). The average rating per evaluator per contour was 3.6. On average, 124 contours were evaluated by each evaluator. 65% of the contours were rated as 4, and 31% were rated as 3. Only 4% of contours were rated as 1 or 2. Thirty-three organs were evaluated in the study, with 19 structures having a 3.5 or above average rating (ribs, abdominopelvic cavity, skeleton, larynx, lung, aorta, brachial plexus, lens, eye globe, glottis, heart, parotid glands, bladder, kidneys, supraglottic larynx, submandibular glands, esophagus, optic nerve, oral cavity) and the remaining organs having a rating of 3.0 or greater (female breast, proximal femur, seminal vesicles, rectum, sternum, brainstem, prostate, brain, lips, mandible, liver, optic chiasm, spinal cord, spleen). No organ had an average rating below 3. Conclusion: AIRC performed well with greater than 95% of contours accepted by treating physicians with no or minor edits. It supported a fully automated workflow with the potential for time savings and increased standardization with the use of AI-powered algorithms for high-quality OAR contouring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: In many clinics, positron-emission tomography is unavailable and clinician time extremely limited. Here we describe a deep-learning model for autocontouring gross disease for patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for primary lung lesions and/or hilar/mediastinal nodal disease, based only on computed tomography (CT) images. Materials and methods: An autocontouring model (nnU-Net) was trained to contour gross disease in 379 cases (352 training, 27 test); 11 further test cases from an external centre were also included. Anchor-point-based post-processing was applied to remove extraneous autocontoured regions. The autocontours were evaluated quantitatively in terms of volume similarity (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], surface Dice coefficient, 95th percentile Hausdorff distance [HD95], and mean surface distance), and scored for usability by two consultant oncologists. The magnitude of treatment margin needed to account for geometric discrepancies was also assessed. Results: The anchor point process successfully removed all erroneous regions from the autocontoured disease, and identified two cases to be excluded from further analysis due to ‘missed’ disease. The average DSC and HD95 were 0.8 ± 0.1 and 10.5 ± 7.3 mm, respectively. A 10-mm uniform margin-distance applied to the autocontoured region was found to yield “full coverage” (sensitivity > 0.99) of the clinical contour for 64 % of cases. Ninety-seven percent of evaluated autocontours were scored by both clinicians as requiring no or minor edits. Conclusions: Our autocontouring model was shown to produce clinically usable disease outlines, based on CT alone, for approximately two-thirds of patients undergoing lung radiotherapy. Further work is necessary to improve this before clinical implementation.

Abstract Background Training senior radiation therapists as “adapters” to manage influencers and target editing is critical in daily online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) for cervical cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and dosimetric outcomes of automatic contouring and identify the key areas for modification. Methods A total of 125 oART fractions from five postoperative cervical cancer patients and 140 oART fractions from five uterine cervical cancer patients treated with daily iCBCT-guided oART were enrolled in this prospective study. The same adaptive treatments were replanned using the Ethos automatic contours workflow without manual contouring edits. The clinical target volume (CTV) was subdivided into several separate regions, and the average surface distance dice (ASD), centroid deviation, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and 95% Hausdorff distance (95% HD) were used to evaluate contouring for the above portions. Dosimetric results from automatic oART plans were compared to supervised oART plans to evaluate target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) dose changes. Results Overall, the paired CTV had high overlap rates, with an average DSC value greater than 0.75. The uterus had the largest consistency differences, with ASD, centroid deviation, and 95% HD being 2.67 ± 1.79 mm, 17.17 ± 12 mm, and 10.45 ± 5.68 mm, respectively. The consistency differences of the lower nodal CTVleft and nodal CTVright were relatively large, with ASD, centroid deviation, and 95% HD being 0.59 ± 0.53 mm, 3.6 ± 2.67 mm, and 5.41 ± 4.08 mm, and 0.59 ± 0.51 mm, 3.6 ± 2.54 mm, and 4.7 ± 1.57 mm, respectively. The automatic online-adapted plan met the clinical requirements of dosimetric coverage for the target volume and improved the OAR dosimetry. Conclusions The accuracy of automatic contouring from the Ethos adaptive platform is considered clinically acceptable for cervical cancer, and the uterus, upper vaginal cuff, and lower nodal CTV are the areas that need to be focused on in training.

Background: Training senior radiation therapists as "adapters" to manage influencers and target editing is critical in daily online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) for cervical cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and dosimetric outcomes of automatic contouring and identify the key areas for modification. Methods: A total of 125 oART fractions from five postoperative cervical cancer patients and 140 oART fractions from five uterine cervical cancer patients treated with daily iCBCT-guided oART were enrolled in this prospective study. The same adaptive treatments were replanned using the Ethos automatic contours workflow without manual contouring edits. The clinical target volume (CTV) was subdivided into several separate regions, and the average surface distance dice (ASD), centroid deviation, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and 95% Hausdorff distance (95% HD) were used to evaluate contouring for the above portions. Dosimetric results from automatic oART plans were compared to supervised oART plans to evaluate target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) dose changes. Results: Overall, the paired CTV had high overlap rates, with an average DSC value greater than 0.75. The uterus had the largest consistency differences, with ASD, centroid deviation, and 95% HD being 2.67 ± 1.79 mm, 17.17 ± 12 mm, and 10.45 ± 5.68 mm, respectively. The consistency differences of the lower nodal CTVleft and nodal CTVright were relatively large, with ASD, centroid deviation, and 95% HD being 0.59 ± 0.53 mm, 3.6 ± 2.67 mm, and 5.41 ± 4.08 mm, and 0.59 ± 0.51 mm, 3.6 ± 2.54 mm, and 4.7 ± 1.57 mm, respectively. The automatic online-adapted plan met the clinical requirements of dosimetric coverage for the target volume and improved the OAR dosimetry. Conclusions: The accuracy of automatic contouring from the Ethos adaptive platform is considered clinically acceptable for cervical cancer, and the uterus, upper vaginal cuff, and lower nodal CTV are the areas that need to be focused on in training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeCreate a comprehensive automated solution for pediatric and adult VMAT-CSI including contouring, planning, and plan check to reduce planning time and improve plan quality.MethodsSeventy-seven previously treated CSI patients (age, 2-67 years) were used for creation of an auto-contouring model to segment 25 organs at risk (OARs). The auto-contoured OARs were evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95), and a qualitative ranking by one physician and one physicist (scale: 1-acceptable, 2-minor edits, 3-major edits). The auto-planning script was developed using the Varian Eclipse Scripting API and tested with 20 patients previously treated with either low-dose VMAT-CSI (12 Gy) or high-dose VMAT-CSI (36 Gy + 18 Gy boost). Clinically relevant metrics, planning time, and blinded physician review were used to evaluate significance of differences between the auto and manual plans. Finally, the plan preparation for treatment and plan check processes were automated to improve efficiency and safety of VMAT-CSI.ResultsThe auto-contours achieved an average DSC of 0.71 ± 0.15, HD95 of 4.81 ± 4.68, and reviewers’ ranking of 1.22 ± 0.39, indicating close to “acceptable-as-is” contours. Compared to the manual CSI plans, the auto-plans for both dose regimens achieved statistically significant reductions in body V50% and Dmean for parotids, submandibular, and thyroid glands. The variance in the dosimetric parameters decreased for the auto-plans as compared to the manual plans indicating better plan consistency. From the blinded review, the auto-plans were marked as equivalent or superior to the manual-plans 88.3% of the time. The required time for the auto-contouring and planning was consistently between 1-2 hours compared to an estimated 5-6 hours for manual contouring and planning.ConclusionsReductions in contouring and planning time without sacrificing plan quality were obtained using the developed auto-planning process. The auto-planning scripts and documentation will be made freely available to other institutions and clinics.

This study aimed to determine the relationship between geometric and dosimetric agreement metrics in head and neck (H&N) cancer radiotherapy plans. A total 287 plans were retrospectively analyzed, comparing auto-contoured and clinically used contours using a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), surface DSC (sDSC), and Hausdorff distance (HD). Organs-at-risk (OARs) with ≥200 cGy dose differences from the clinical contour in terms of Dmax (D0.01cc) and Dmean were further examined against proximity to the planning target volume (PTV). A secondary set of 91 plans from multiple institutions validated these findings. For 4995 contour pairs across 19 OARs, 90% had a DSC, sDSC, and HD of at least 0.75, 0.86, and less than 7.65 mm, respectively. Dosimetrically, the absolute difference between the two contour sets was max and 96% in terms of Dmean. In total, 97% of OARs exhibiting significant dose differences between the clinically edited contour and auto-contour were within 2.5 cm PTV regardless of geometric agreement. There was an approximately linear trend between geometric agreement and identifying at least 200 cGy dose differences, with higher geometric agreement corresponding to a lower fraction of cases being identified. Analysis of the secondary dataset validated these findings. Geometric indices are approximate indicators of contour quality and identify contours exhibiting significant dosimetric discordance. For a small subset of OARs within 2.5 cm of the PTV, geometric agreement metrics can be misleading in terms of contour quality.

Purpose: To quantify interobserver variation (IOV) in target volume and organs-at-risk (OAR) contouring across 31 institutions in breast cancer cases and to explore the clinical utility of deep learning (DL)-based auto-contouring in reducing potential IOV. Methods and materials: In phase 1, two breast cancer cases were randomly selected and distributed to multiple institutions for contouring six clinical target volumes (CTVs) and eight OAR. In Phase 2, auto-contour sets were generated using a previously published DL Breast segmentation model and were made available for all participants. The difference in IOV of submitted contours in phases 1 and 2 was investigated quantitatively using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). The qualitative analysis involved using contour heat maps to visualize the extent and location of these variations and the required modification. Results: Over 800 pairwise comparisons were analysed for each structure in each case. Quantitative phase 2 metrics showed significant improvement in the mean DSC (from 0.69 to 0.77) and HD (from 34.9 to 17.9 mm). Quantitative analysis showed increased interobserver agreement in phase 2, specifically for CTV structures (5–19 %), leading to fewer manual adjustments. Underlying IOV differences causes were reported using a questionnaire and hierarchical clustering analysis based on the volume of CTVs. Conclusion: DL-based auto-contours improved the contour agreement for OARs and CTVs significantly, both qualitatively and quantitatively, suggesting its potential role in minimizing radiation therapy protocol deviation.

Purpose: Deep neural nets have revolutionized the science of auto‐segmentation and present great promise for treatment planning automation. However, little data exists regarding clinical implementation and human factors. We evaluated the performance and clinical implementation of a novel deep learning‐based auto‐contouring workflow for 0.35T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐guided pelvic radiotherapy, focusing on automation bias and objective measures of workflow savings. Methods: An auto‐contouring model was developed using a UNet‐derived architecture for the femoral heads, bladder, and rectum in 0.35T MR images. Training data was taken from 75 patients treated with MRI‐guided radiotherapy at our institution. The model was tested against 20 retrospective cases outside the training set, and subsequently was clinically implemented. Usability was evaluated on the first 30 clinical cases by computing Dice coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and the fraction of slices that were used un‐modified by planners. Final contours were retrospectively reviewed by an experienced planner and clinical significance of deviations was graded as negligible, low, moderate, and high probability of leading to actionable dosimetric variations. In order to assess whether the use of auto‐contouring led to final contours more or less in agreement with an objective standard, 10 pre‐treatment and 10 post‐treatment blinded cases were re‐contoured from scratch by three expert planners to get expert consensus contours (EC). EC was compared to clinically used (CU) contours using DSC. Student's t‐test and Levene's statistic were used to test statistical significance of differences in mean and standard deviation, respectively. Finally, the dosimetric significance of the contour differences were assessed by comparing the difference in bladder and rectum maximum point doses between EC and CU before and after the introduction of automation. Results: Median (interquartile range) DSC for the retrospective test data were 0.92(0.02), 0.92(0.06), 0.93(0.06), 0.87(0.04) for the post‐processed contours for the right and left femoral heads, bladder, and rectum, respectively. Post‐implementation median DSC were 1.0(0.0), 1.0(0.0), 0.98(0.04), and 0.98(0.06), respectively. For each organ, 96.2, 95.4, 59.5, and 68.21 percent of slices were used unmodified by the planner. DSC between EC and pre‐implementation CU contours were 0.91(0.05*), 0.91*(0.05*), 0.95(0.04), and 0.88(0.04) for right and left femoral heads, bladder, and rectum, respectively. The corresponding DSC for post‐implementation CU contours were 0.93(0.02*), 0.93*(0.01*), 0.96(0.01), and 0.85(0.02) (asterisks indicate statistically significant difference). In a retrospective review of contours used for planning, a total of four deviating slices in two patients were graded as low potential clinical significance. No deviations were graded as moderate or high. Mean differences between EC and CU rectum max‐doses were 0.1 ± 2.6 Gy and −0.9 ± 2.5 Gy for pre‐ and post‐implementation, respectively. Mean differences between EC and CU bladder/bladder wall max‐doses were −0.9 ± 4.1 Gy and 0.0 ± 0.6 Gy for pre‐ and post‐implementation, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant according to Student's t‐test. Conclusion: We have presented an analysis of the clinical implementation of a novel auto‐contouring workflow. Substantial workflow savings were obtained. The introduction of auto‐contouring into the clinical workflow changed the contouring behavior of planners. Automation bias was observed, but it had little deleterious effect on treatment planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurately identifying and contouring the organs at risk (OARs) is a crucial step in radiation treatment planning for precise dose calculation. This task becomes especially challenging in computed tomography (CT) images due to the irregular boundaries of the organs under study. The method currently employed in clinical practice is the manual contouring of CT images, which tends to be highly tedious and time‐consuming. The results are also prone to variations depending on the observer's skill level, environment, or equipment types. A deep learning‐based automatic contouring technique for segmenting OARs would help eliminate these problems and generate consistent results with minimal time and human effort. Our approach is to design a conditional generative adversarial network (GAN)‐based technique for the semantic segmentation of OARs in abdominal CT images. The residual blocks of the generator network have a multi‐scale context layer that explores more generic characteristics, greatly enhancing performance and lowering losses. A comparative analysis is undertaken based on various assessment measures widely employed in segmentation. The results show substantial improvement, with mean dice scores of 98.0%, 96.6%, 98.2%, and 86.1% for the respective organs—liver, kidney, spleen, and pancreas—in the abdominal CT. The proposed GAN‐based model could accurately segment the four abdominal organs, including the liver, kidney, spleen, and pancreas. The obtained results prove that the suggested model is able to compete with existing state‐of‐the‐art abdominal OAR segmentation techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based auto-contouring for treatment planning in radiotherapy needs extensive clinical validation, including the impact of editing after automatic segmentation. The aims of this study were to assess the performance of a commercial system for Clinical Target Volumes (CTVs) (prostate/seminal vesicles) and selected Organs at Risk (OARs) (rectum/bladder/femoral heads + femurs), evaluating also inter-observer variability (manual vs automatic + editing) and the reduction of contouring time. Materials and methods: Two expert observers contoured CTVs/OARs of 20 patients in our Treatment Planning System (TPS). Computed Tomography (CT) images were sent to the automatic contouring workstation: automatic contours were generated and sent back to TPS, where observers could edit them if necessary. Inter- and intra-observer consistency was estimated using Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC). Radiation oncologists were also asked to score the quality of automatic contours, ranging from 1 (complete re-contouring) to 5 (no editing). Contouring times (manual vs automatic + edit) were compared. Results: DSCs (manual vs automatic only) were consistent with inter-observer variability (between 0.65 for seminal vesicles and 0.94 for bladder); editing further improved performances (range: 0.76–0.94). The median clinical score was 4 (little editing) and it was

Background: Absorbable hydrogel spacer injected between prostate and rectum is gaining popularity for rectal sparing. The spacer alters patient anatomy and thus requires new auto‐contouring models. Purpose: To report the development and comprehensive evaluation of two deep‐learning models for patients injected with a radio‐transparent (model I) versus radiopaque (model II) spacer. Methods and materials: Model I was trained and cross‐validated by 135 cases with transparent spacer and tested on 24 cases. Using refined training methods, model II was trained and cross‐validated by the same dataset, but with the Hounsfield Unit distribution in the spacer overridden by that obtained from ten cases with opaque spacer. Model II was tested on 64 cases. The models auto‐contour eight regions of interest (ROIs): spacer, prostate, proximal seminal vesicles (SVs), left and right femurs, bladder, rectum, and penile bulb. Qualitatively, each auto contour (AC), as well as the composite set, was assessed against manual contour (MC), by a radiation oncologist using a 1 (accepted directly or after minor editing), 2 (accepted after moderate editing), 3 (accepted after major editing), and 4 (rejected) scoring scale. The efficiency gain was characterized by the mean score as nearly complete [1–1.75], substantial (1.75–2.5], meaningful (2.5–3.25], and no (3.25–4.00]. Quantitatively, the geometric similarity between AC and MC was evaluated by dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA), using tolerance recommended by AAPM TG‐132 Report. The results by the two models were compared to examine the outcome of the refined training methods. The large number of testing cases for model II allowed further investigation of inter‐observer variability in clinical dataset. The correlation between score and DSC/MDA was studied on the ROIs with 10 or more counts of each acceptable score (1, 2, 3). Results: For model I/model II: the mean score was 3.63/1.30 for transparent/opaque spacer, 2.71/2.16 for prostate, 3.25/2.44 for proximal SVs, 1.13/1.02 for both femurs, 2.25/1.25 for bladder, 3.00/2.06 for rectum, 3.38/2.42 for penile bulb, and 2.79/2.20 for the composite set; the mean DSC was 0.52/0.84 for spacer, 0.84/0.85 for prostate, 0.60/0.62 for proximal SVs, 0.94/0.96 for left femur, 0.95/0.96 for right femur, 0.91/0.95 for bladder, 0.81/0.84 for rectum, and 0.65/0.65 for penile bulb; and the mean MDA was 2.9/0.9 mm for spacer, 1.9/1.7 mm for prostate, 2.4/2.3 mm for proximal SVs, 0.8/0.5 mm for left femur, 0.7/0.5 mm for right femur, 1.5/0.9 mm for bladder, 2.3/1.9 mm for rectum, and 2.2/2.2 mm for penile bulb. Model II showed significantly improved scores for all ROIs, and metrics for spacer, femurs, bladder, and rectum. Significant inter‐observer variability was only found for prostate. Highly linear correlation between the score and DSC was found for the two qualified ROIs (prostate and rectum). Conclusions: The overall efficiency gain was meaningful for model I and substantial for model II. The ROIs meeting the clinical deployment criteria (mean score below 3.25, DSC above 0.8, and MDA below 2.5 mm) included prostate, both femurs, bladder and rectum for both models, and spacer for model II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The prostate demonstrates inter- and intra- fractional changes and thus adaptive radiotherapy would be required to ensure optimal coverage. Daily adaptive radiotherapy for MRI-guided radiotherapy can be both time and resource intensive when structure delineation is completed manually. Contours can be auto-generated on the MR-Linac via a deformable image registration (DIR) based mapping process from the reference image. This study evaluates the performance of automatically generated target structure contours against manually delineated contours by radiation oncologists for prostate radiotherapy on the Elekta Unity MR-Linac. Methods: Plans were generated from prostate contours propagated by DIR and rigid image registration (RIR) for forty fractions from ten patients. A two-dose level SIB (simultaneous integrated boost) IMRT plan is used to treat localised prostate cancer; 6000 cGy to the prostate and 4860 cGy to the seminal vesicles. The dose coverage of the PTV 6000 and PTV 4860 created from the manually drawn target structures was evaluated with each plan. If the dose objectives were met, the plan was considered successful in covering the gold standard (clinician-delineated) volume. Results: The mandatory PTV 6000 dose objective (D98% > 5580 cGy) was met in 81 % of DIR plans and 45 % of RIR plans. The SV were mapped by DIR only and for all the plans, the PTV 4860 dose objective met the optimal target (D98% > 4617 cGy). The plans created by RIR led to under-coverage of the clinician-delineated prostate, predominantly at the apex or the bladder-prostate interface. Conclusion: Plans created from DIR propagation of prostate contours outperform those created from RIR propagation. In approximately 1 in 5 DIR plans, dosimetric coverage of the gold standard PTV was not clinically acceptable. Thus, at our institution, we use a combination of DIR propagation of contours alongside manual editing of contours where deemed necessary for online treatments.

Background and purpose: Deep learning contouring (DLC) has the potential to decrease contouring time and variability of organ contours. This work evaluates the effectiveness of DLC for prostate and head and neck across four radiotherapy centres using a commercial system. Materials and methods: Computed tomography scans of 123 prostate and 310 head and neck patients were evaluated. Besides one head and neck model, generic DLC models were used. Contouring time using centres’ existing clinical methods and contour editing time after DLC were compared. Timing was evaluated using paired and non-paired studies. Commercial software or in-house scripts assessed dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and distance to agreement (DTA). One centre assessed head and neck inter-observer variability. Results: The mean contouring time saved for prostate structures using DLC compared to the existing clinical method was 5.9 ± 3.5 min. The best agreement was shown for the femoral heads (median DSC 0.92 ± 0.03, median DTA 1.5 ± 0.3 mm) and the worst for the rectum (median DSC 0.68 ± 0.04, median DTA 4.6 ± 0.6 mm). The mean contouring time saved for head and neck structures using DLC was 16.2 ± 8.6 min. For one centre there was no DLC time-saving compared to an atlas-based method. DLC contours reduced inter-observer variability compared to manual contours for the brainstem, left parotid gland and left submandibular gland. Conclusions: Generic prostate and head and neck DLC models can provide time-savings which can be assessed with paired or non-paired studies to integrate with clinical workload. Reducing inter-observer variability potential has been shown.

Background and purpose: Deep learning-based models have been actively investigated for various aspects of radiotherapy. However, for cervical cancer, only a few studies dealing with the auto-segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) and clinical target volumes (CTVs) exist. This study aimed to train a deep learningbased auto-segmentation model for OAR/CTVs for patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy and to evaluate the model's feasibility and efficacy with not only geometric indices but also comprehensive clinical evaluation. Materials and methods: A total of 180 abdominopelvic computed tomography images were included (training set, 165; validation set, 15). Geometric indices such as the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) were analyzed. A Turing test was performed and physicians from other institutions were asked to delineate contours with and without using auto-segmented contours to assess inter-physician heterogeneity and contouring time. Results: The correlation between the manual and auto-segmented contours was acceptable for the anorectum, bladder, spinal cord, cauda equina, right and left femoral heads, bowel bag, uterocervix, liver, and left and right kidneys (DSC greater than 0.80). The stomach and duodenum showed DSCs of 0.67 and 0.73, respectively. CTVs showed DSCs between 0.75 and 0.80. Turing test results were favorable for most OARs and CTVs. No auto-segmented contours had large, obvious errors. The median overall satisfaction score of the participating physicians was 7 out of 10. Auto-segmentation reduced heterogeneity and shortened contouring time by 30 min among radiation oncologists from different institutions. Most participants favored the auto-contouring system. Conclusion: The proposed deep learning-based auto-segmentation model may be an efficient tool for patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Although the current model may not completely replace humans, it can serve as a useful and efficient tool in real-world clinics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: Interactive segmentation seeks to incorporate human knowledge into segmentation models and thereby reducing the total amount of editing of auto-segmentations. By performing only interactions which provide new information, segmentation performance may increase cost-effectively. The aim of this study was to develop, evaluate and test feasibility of a deep learning-based single-cycle interactive segmentation model with the input being computer tomography (CT) and a small amount of information rich contours. Methods and Materials: A single-cycle interactive segmentation model, which took CT and the most cranial and caudal contour slices for each of 16 organs-at-risk for head-and-neck cancer as input, was developed. A CT-only model served as control. The models were evaluated with Dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff Distance 95th percentile and average symmetric surface distance. A subset of 8 organs-at-risk were selected for a feasibility test. In this, a designated radiation oncologist used both single-cycle interactive segmentation and atlas-based auto-contouring for three cases. Contouring time and added path length were recorded. Results: The medians of Dice coefficients increased with single-cycle interactive segmentation in the range of 0.004 (Brain)–0.90 (EyeBack_merged) when compared to CT-only. In the feasibility test, contouring time and added path length were reduced for all three cases as compared to editing atlas-based auto-segmentations. Conclusion: Single-cycle interactive segmentation improved segmentation metrics when compared to the CT-only model and was clinically feasible from a technical and usability point of view. The study suggests that it may be cost-effective to add a small amount of contouring input to deep learning-based segmentation models.

The segmentation of Organs At Risk (OAR) in Computed Tomography (CT) images is an essential part of the planning phase of radiation treatment to avoid the adverse effects of cancer radiotherapy treatment. Accurate segmentation is a tedious task in the head and neck region due to a large number of small and sensitive organs and the low contrast of CT images. Deep learning‐based automatic contouring algorithms can ease this task even when the organs have irregular shapes and size variations. This paper proposes a fully automatic deep learning‐based self‐supervised 3D Residual UNet architecture with CBAM(Convolution Block Attention Mechanism) for the organ segmentation in head and neck CT images. The Model Genesis structure and image context restoration techniques are used for self‐supervision, which can help the network learn image features from unlabeled data, hence solving the annotated medical data scarcity problem in deep networks. A new loss function is applied for training by integrating Focal loss, Tversky loss, and Cross‐entropy loss. The proposed model outperforms the state‐of‐the‐art methods in terms of dice similarity coefficient in segmenting the organs. Our self‐supervised model could achieve a 4% increase in the dice score of Chiasm, which is a small organ that is present only in a very few CT slices. The proposed model exhibited better accuracy for 5 out of 7 OARs than the recent state‐of‐the‐art models. The proposed model could simultaneously segment all seven organs in an average time of 0.02 s. The source code of this work is made available at https://github.com/seeniafrancis/SABOSNet. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: User-adjustments after deep-learning (DL) contouring in radiotherapy were evaluated to get insight in real-world editing during clinical practice. This study assessed the amount, type and spatial regions of editing of auto-contouring for organs-at-risk (OARs) in routine clinical workflow for patients in the thorax region. Materials and methods: A total of 350 lung cancer and 362 breast cancer patients, contoured between March 2020 and March 2021 using a commercial DL-contouring method followed by manual adjustments were retrospectively analyzed. Subsampling was performed for some OARs, using an inter-slice gap of 1–3 slices. Commonly-used whole-organ contouring assessment measures were calculated, and all cases were registered to a common reference shape per OAR to identify regions of manual adjustment. Results were expressed as the median, 10th-90th percentile of adjustment and visualized using 3D renderings. Results: Per OAR, the median amount of editing was below 1 mm. However, large adjustments were found in some locations for most OARs. In general, enlarging of the auto-contours was needed. Subsampling DL-contours showed less adjustments were made in the interpolated slices compared to simulated no-subsampling for these OARs. Conclusion: The real-world performance of automatic DL-contouring software was evaluated and proven useful in clinical practice. Specific regions-of-adjustment were identified per OAR in the thorax region, and separate models were found to be necessary for specific clinical indications different from training data. This analysis showed the need to perform routine clinical analysis especially when procedures or acquisition protocols change to have the best configuration of the workflow.

Simple Summary: When treating patients with head-and-neck cancer (HNC), in addition to the primary tumour, commonly involved lymph node (LN) levels are often electively irradiated. This requires the definition of the elective LN target volume. Because the LN levels that will be included in the target depend on the clinical situation, and because manual contouring is a laborious task that can also introduce inter- and intra-observer variation, being able to automate the segmentation of individual LN levels would reduce the clinical burden and would allow use of contours regardless of the primary tumor location. We trained and evaluated three patch- and/or voxel-based deep learning frameworks to segment elective LN levels. Our results suggest that accurate segmentations can be obtained using an ensemble of patch-based UNets and that this result can be further refined by sequentially applying a 2.5D, multi-view voxel classification network. Depending on the clinical situation, different combinations of lymph node (LN) levels define the elective LN target volume in head-and-neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy. The accurate auto-contouring of individual LN levels could reduce the burden and variability of manual segmentation and be used regardless of the primary tumor location. We evaluated three deep learning approaches for the segmenting individual LN levels I–V, which were manually contoured on CT scans from 70 HNC patients. The networks were trained and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation and ensemble learning for 60 patients with (1) 3D patch-based UNets, (2) multi-view (MV) voxel classification networks and (3) sequential UNet+MV. The performances were evaluated using Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for automated and manual segmentations for individual levels, and the planning target volumes were extrapolated from the combined levels I–V and II–IV, both for the cross-validation and for an independent test set of 10 patients. The median DSC were 0.80, 0.66 and 0.82 for UNet, MV and UNet+MV, respectively. Overall, UNet+MV significantly (p < 0.0001) outperformed other arrangements and yielded DSC = 0.87, 0.85, 0.86, 0.82, 0.77, 0.77 for the combined and individual level I–V structures, respectively. Both PTVs were also significantly (p < 0.0001) more accurate with UNet+MV, with DSC = 0.91 and 0.90, respectively. The accurate segmentation of individual LN levels I–V can be achieved using an ensemble of UNets. UNet+MV can further refine this result. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) are phagocytized by the hepatic Kupffer cells (KC) in the liver and shorten MRI signals within the volume of functional liver parenchyma (FLP) where KCs are found. However, malignant tumors lacking KCs exhibit minimal signal change, resulting in increasing liver heterogeneity. This study investigates whether SPIONs improve liver heterogeneity on R2*-MRI to characterize FLP and non-FLP (i.e., tumor, hepatic vessels, liver fibrosis and scarring associated with hepatic cirrhosis, prior liver-directed therapies or hepatic resection). By using SPIONs, liver heterogeneity was improved across two MRI sessions with and without an intravenous SPION injection, and the volume of FLP was identified in our auto-contouring tool. This is a desirable technique for achieving more accurate characterizations of liver function and tumors during radiation treatment planning. The use of super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) as an MRI contrast agent (SPION-CA) can safely label hepatic macrophages and be localized within hepatic parenchyma for T2*- and R2*-MRI of the liver. To date, no study has utilized the R2*-MRI with SPIONs for quantifying liver heterogeneity to characterize functional liver parenchyma (FLP) and hepatic tumors. This study investigates whether SPIONs enhance liver heterogeneity for an auto-contouring tool to identify the voxel-wise functional liver parenchyma volume (FLPV). This was the first study to directly evaluate the impact of SPIONs on the FLPV in R2*-MRI for 12 liver cancer patients. By using SPIONs, liver heterogeneity was improved across pre- and post-SPION MRI sessions. On average, 60% of the liver [range 40–78%] was identified as the FLPV in our auto-contouring tool with a pre-determined threshold of the mean R2* of the tumor and liver. This method performed well in 10 out of 12 liver cancer patients; the remaining 2 needed a longer echo time. These results demonstrate that our contouring tool with SPIONs can facilitate the heterogeneous R2* of the liver to automatically characterize FLP. This is a desirable technique for achieving more accurate FLPV contouring during liver radiation treatment planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To fully automate CT‐based cervical cancer radiotherapy by automating contouring and planning for three different treatment techniques. Methods: We automated three different radiotherapy planning techniques for locally advanced cervical cancer: 2D 4‐field‐box (4‐field‐box), 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D‐CRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). These auto‐planning algorithms were combined with a previously developed auto‐contouring system. To improve the quality of the 4‐field‐box and 3D‐CRT plans, we used an in‐house, field‐in‐field (FIF) automation program. Thirty‐five plans were generated for each technique on CT scans from multiple institutions and evaluated by five experienced radiation oncologists from three different countries. Every plan was reviewed by two of the five radiation oncologists and scored using a 5‐point Likert scale. Results: Overall, 87%, 99%, and 94% of the automatically generated plans were found to be clinically acceptable without modification for the 4‐field‐box, 3D‐CRT, and VMAT plans, respectively. Some customizations of the FIF configuration were necessary on the basis of radiation oncologist preference. Additionally, in some cases, it was necessary to renormalize the plan after it was generated to satisfy radiation oncologist preference. Conclusion: Approximately, 90% of the automatically generated plans were clinically acceptable for all three planning techniques. This fully automated planning system has been implemented into the radiation planning assistant for further testing in resource‐constrained radiotherapy departments in low‐ and middle‐income countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of Artificial-Intelligence (AI) segmentation in Total Marrow Irradiation (TMI) including contours throughout the head and neck (H&N), thorax, abdomen, and pelvis. Methods: An AI segmentation software was clinically introduced for total body contouring in TMI including 27 organs at risk (OARs) and 4 planning target volumes (PTVs). This work compares the clinically utilized contours to the AITMI contours for 21 patients. Structure and image dicom data was used to generate comparisons including volumetric, spatial, and dosimetric variations between the AI- and human-edited contour sets. Conventional volume and surface measures including the Sørensen–Dice coefficient (Dice) and the 95th% Hausdorff Distance (HD95) were used, and novel efficiency metrics were introduced. The clinical efficiency gains were estimated by the percentage of the AI-contour-surface within 1mm of the clinical contour surface. An unedited AI-contour has an efficiency gain=100%, an AI-contour with 70% of its surface<1mm from a clinical contour has an efficiency gain of 70%. The dosimetric deviations were estimated from the clinical dose distribution to compute the dose volume histogram (DVH) for all structures. Results: A total of 467 contours were compared in the 21 patients. In PTVs, contour surfaces deviatedby>1mmin38.6%±23.1%of structures, anaverageefficiencygain of 61.4%. Deviations >5mmwere detected in 12.0% ± 21.3% of the PTV contours. In OARs,deviations>1mmweredetectedin24.4%±27.1%ofthestructuresurfacesand >5mm in 7.2% ± 18.0%; an average clinical efficiency gain of 75.6%. In H&N OARs, efficiency gains ranged from 42% in optic chiasm to 100% in eyes (unedited in all cases). In thorax, average efficiency gainswere >80% in spinal cord, heart, and both lungs. Efficiency gains ranged from 60-70% in spleen, stomach, rectum, and bowel and 75-84% in liver, kidney, and bladder.DVHdifferences exceeded 0.05 in 109/467 curves at any dose level. The most common 5%-DVH variations were in esophagus (86%), rectum (48%), and PTVs (22%). Conclusions: AI auto-segmentation software offers a powerful solution for enhanced efficiency in TMI treatment planning. Whole body segmentation including PTVs and normal organs was successful based on spatial and dosimetric comparison. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeTo evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of Artificial-Intelligence (AI) segmentation in Total Marrow Irradiation (TMI) including contours throughout the head and neck (H&N), thorax, abdomen, and pelvis.MethodsAn AI segmentation software was clinically introduced for total body contouring in TMI including 27 organs at risk (OARs) and 4 planning target volumes (PTVs). This work compares the clinically utilized contours to the AI-TMI contours for 21 patients. Structure and image dicom data was used to generate comparisons including volumetric, spatial, and dosimetric variations between the AI- and human-edited contour sets. Conventional volume and surface measures including the Sørensen–Dice coefficient (Dice) and the 95th% Hausdorff Distance (HD95) were used, and novel efficiency metrics were introduced. The clinical efficiency gains were estimated by the percentage of the AI-contour-surface within 1mm of the clinical contour surface. An unedited AI-contour has an efficiency gain=100%, an AI-contour with 70% of its surface1mm in 38.6% ± 23.1% of structures, an average efficiency gain of 61.4%. Deviations >5mm were detected in 12.0% ± 21.3% of the PTV contours. In OARs, deviations >1mm were detected in 24.4% ± 27.1% of the structure surfaces and >5mm in 7.2% ± 18.0%; an average clinical efficiency gain of 75.6%. In H&N OARs, efficiency gains ranged from 42% in optic chiasm to 100% in eyes (unedited in all cases). In thorax, average efficiency gains were >80% in spinal cord, heart, and both lungs. Efficiency gains ranged from 60-70% in spleen, stomach, rectum, and bowel and 75-84% in liver, kidney, and bladder. DVH differences exceeded 0.05 in 109/467 curves at any dose level. The most common 5%-DVH variations were in esophagus (86%), rectum (48%), and PTVs (22%).ConclusionsAI auto-segmentation software offers a powerful solution for enhanced efficiency in TMI treatment planning. Whole body segmentation including PTVs and normal organs was successful based on spatial and dosimetric comparison.

Purpose: Little is known about the scale of clinical implementation of automated treatment planning techniques in the United States. In this work, we examine the barriers and facilitators to adoption of commercially available automated planning tools into the clinical workflow using a survey of medical dosimetrists. Methods/materials: Survey questions were developed based on a literature review of automation research and cognitive interviews of medical dosimetrists at our institution. Treatment planning automation was defined to include auto‐contouring and automated treatment planning. Survey questions probed frequency of use, positive and negative perceptions, potential implementation changes, and demographic and institutional descriptive statistics. The survey sample was identified using both a LinkedIn search and referral requests sent to physics directors and senior physicists at 34 radiotherapy clinics in our state. The survey was active from August 2020 to April 2021. Results: Thirty‐four responses were collected out of 59 surveys sent. Three categories of barriers to use of automation were identified. The first related to perceptions of limited accuracy and usability of the algorithms. Eighty‐eight percent of respondents reported that auto‐contouring inaccuracy limited its use, and 62% thought it was difficult to modify an automated plan, thus limiting its usefulness. The second barrier relates to the perception that automation increases the probability of an error reaching the patient. Third, respondents were concerned that automation will make their jobs less satisfying and less secure. Large majorities reported that they enjoyed plan optimization, would not want to lose that part of their job, and expressed explicit job security fears. Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first systematic investigation into the views of automation by medical dosimetrists. Potential barriers and facilitators to use were explicitly identified. This investigation highlights several concrete approaches that could potentially increase the translation of automation into the clinic, along with areas of needed research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Auto-contour SPECT modelling (step & shoot acquisition). • Phantom SPECT projection simulation and validation against experiments. • Importance of auto-contour modelling on radionuclide with high septal penetration. • Extend auto-contour modelling to a context of clinical dosimetry. Monte Carlo modelling of SPECT imaging in Molecular Radiotherapy can improve activity quantification. Until now, SPECT modelling with GATE only considered circular orbit (CO) acquisitions. This cannot reproduce auto-contour acquisitions, where the detector head moves close to the patient to improve image resolution. The aim of this work is to develop and validate an auto-contouring step-and-shoot acquisition mode for GATE SPECT modelling. 177Lu and 131I SPECT experimental acquisitions performed on a Siemens Symbia T2 and GE Discovery 670 gamma camera, respectively, were modelled. SPECT projections were obtained for a cylindrical Jaszczak phantom and a lung and spine phantom. Detector head parameters (radial positions and acquisition angles) were extracted from the experimental projections to model the non-circular orbit (NCO) detector motion. The gamma camera model was validated against the experimental projections obtained with the cylindrical Jaszczak (177Lu) and lung and spine phantom (131I). Then, 177Lu and 131I CO and NCO SPECT projections were simulated to validate the impact of explicit NCO modelling on simulated projections. Experimental and simulated SPECT images were compared using the gamma index, and were in good agreement with gamma index passing rate (GIPR) and gamma avg of 96.27%, 0.242 (177Lu) and 92.89%, 0.36 (131I). Then, simulated 177Lu and 131I CO and NCO SPECT projections were compared. The GIPR, gamma avg between the two gamma camera motions was 99.85%, 0.108 for 177Lu and 75.58%, 0.6 for 131I. This work thereby justifies the need for auto-contouring modelling for isotopes with high septal penetration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This retrospective work aims to evaluate the possible impact on intra‐ and inter‐observer variability, contouring time, and contour accuracy of introducing a pelvis computed tomography (CT) auto‐segmentation tool in radiotherapy planning workflow. Methods: Tests were carried out on five structures (bladder, rectum, pelvic lymph‐nodes, and femoral heads) of six previously treated subjects, enrolling five radiation oncologists (ROs) to manually re‐contour and edit auto‐contours generated with a male pelvis CT atlas created with the commercial software MIM MAESTRO. The ROs first delineated manual contours (M). Then they modified the auto‐contours, producing automatic‐modified (AM) contours. The procedure was repeated to evaluate intra‐observer variability, producing M1, M2, AM1, and AM2 contour sets (each comprising 5 structures × 6 test patients × 5 ROs = 150 contours), for a total of 600 contours. Potential time savings was evaluated by comparing contouring and editing times. Structure contours were compared to a reference standard by means of Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA), to assess intra‐ and inter‐observer variability. To exclude any automation bias, ROs evaluated both M and AM sets as "clinically acceptable" or "to be corrected" in a blind test. Results: Comparing AM to M sets, a significant reduction of both inter‐observer variability (p < 0.001) and contouring time (‐45% whole pelvis, p < 0.001) was obtained. Intra‐observer variability reduction was significant only for bladder and femoral heads (p < 0.001). The statistical test showed no significant bias. Conclusion: Our atlas‐based workflow proved to be effective for clinical practice as it can improve contour reproducibility and generate time savings. Based on these findings, institutions are encouraged to implement their auto‐segmentation method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: Auto-contouring performance has been widely studied in development and commissioning studies in radiotherapy, and its impact on clinical workflow assessed in that context. This study aimed to evaluate the manual adjustment of auto-contouring in routine clinical practice and to identify improvements regarding the auto-contouring model and clinical user interaction, to improve the efficiency of auto-contouring. Materials and methods: A total of 103 clinical head and neck cancer cases, contoured using a commercial deep-learning contouring system and subsequently checked and edited for clinical use were retrospectively taken from clinical data over a twelve-month period (April 2019–April 2020). The amount of adjustment performed was calculated, and all cases were registered to a common reference frame for assessment purposes. The median, 10th and 90th percentile of adjustment were calculated and displayed using 3D renderings of structures to visually assess systematic and random adjustment. Results were also compared to inter-observer variation reported previously. Assessment was performed for both the whole structures and for regional sub-structures, and according to the radiation therapy technologist (RTT) who edited the contour. Results: The median amount of adjustment was low for all structures (

Background and purpose: Head and neck (HN) radiotherapy can benefit from automatic delineation of tumor and surrounding organs because of the complex anatomy and the regular need for adaptation. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a commercially available deep learning contouring (DLC) model on an external validation set. Materials and methods: The CT-based DLC model, trained at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), was applied to an independent set of 58 patients from the Radboud University Medical Center (RUMC). DLC results were compared to the RUMC manual reference using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance (HD95). Craniocaudal spatial information was added by calculating binned measures. In addition, a qualitative evaluation compared the acceptance of manual and DLC contours in both groups of observers. Results: Good correspondence was shown for the mandible (DSC 0.90; HD95 3.6 mm). Performance was reasonable for the glandular OARs, brainstem and oral cavity (DSC 0.78–0.85, HD95 3.7–7.3 mm). The other aerodigestive tract OARs showed only moderate agreement (DSC 0.53–0.65, HD95 around 9 mm). The binned measures displayed the largest deviations caudally and/or cranially. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the DLC model can provide a reasonable starting point for delineation when applied to an independent patient cohort. The qualitative evaluation did not reveal large differences in the interpretation of contouring guidelines between RUMC and UMCG observers.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to develop a practicable automatic clinical target volume (CTV) delineation method for radiotherapy of breast cancer after modified radical mastectomy.Methods: Unlike breast conserving surgery, the radiotherapy CTV for modified radical mastectomy involves several regions, including CTV in the chest wall (CTVcw), supra- and infra-clavicular region (CTVsc), and internal mammary lymphatic region (CTVim). For accurate and efficient segmentation of the CTVs in radiotherapy of breast cancer after modified radical mastectomy, a multi-scale convolutional neural network with an orientation attention mechanism is proposed to capture the corresponding features in different perception fields. A channel-specific local Dice loss, alongside several data augmentation methods, is also designed specifically to stabilize the model training and improve the generalization performance of the model. The segmentation performance is quantitatively evaluated by statistical metrics and qualitatively evaluated by clinicians in terms of consistency and time efficiency.Results: The proposed method is trained and evaluated on the self-collected dataset, which contains 110 computed tomography scans from patients with breast cancer who underwent modified mastectomy. The experimental results show that the proposed segmentation method achieved superior performance in terms of Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD) and Average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) compared with baseline approaches.Conclusion: Both quantitative and qualitative evaluation results demonstrated that the specifically designed method is practical and effective in automatic contouring of CTVs for radiotherapy of breast cancer after modified radical mastectomy. Clinicians can significantly save time on manual delineation while obtaining contouring results with high consistency by employing this method.

Background and Purpose: In many clinics, positron-emission tomography is unavailable and clinician time extremely limited. Here we describe a deep-learning model for autocontouring gross disease for patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for primary lung lesions and/or hilar/mediastinal nodal disease, based only on computed tomography (CT) images., Materials and Methods: An autocontouring model (nnU-Net) was trained to contour gross disease in 379 cases (352 training, 27 test); 11 further test cases from an external centre were also included. Anchor-point-based post-processing was applied to remove extraneous autocontoured regions. The autocontours were evaluated quantitatively in terms of volume similarity (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], surface Dice coefficient, 95 th percentile Hausdorff distance [HD95], and mean surface distance), and scored for usability by two consultant oncologists. The magnitude of treatment margin needed to account for geometric discrepancies was also assessed., Results: The anchor point process successfully removed all erroneous regions from the autocontoured disease, and identified two cases to be excluded from further analysis due to 'missed' disease. The average DSC and HD95 were 0.8 ± 0.1 and 10.5 ± 7.3 mm, respectively. A 10-mm uniform margin-distance applied to the autocontoured region was found to yield "full coverage" (sensitivity > 0.99) of the clinical contour for 64 % of cases. Ninety-seven percent of evaluated autocontours were scored by both clinicians as requiring no or minor edits., Conclusions: Our autocontouring model was shown to produce clinically usable disease outlines, based on CT alone, for approximately two-thirds of patients undergoing lung radiotherapy. Further work is necessary to improve this before clinical implementation., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society of Radiotherapy & Oncology.)

Deep-learning (DL)-based auto-contouring solutions have recently been proposed as a convincing alternative to decrease workload of target volumes and organs-at-risk (OAR) delineation in radiotherapy planning and improve inter-observer consistency. However, there is minimal literature of clinical implementations of such algorithms in a clinical routine. In this paper we first present an update of the state-of-the-art of DL-based solutions. We then summarize recent recommendations proposed by the European society for radiotherapy and oncology (ESTRO) to be followed before any clinical implementation of artificial intelligence-based solutions in clinic. The last section describes the methodology carried out by three French radiation oncology departments to deploy CE-marked commercial solutions. Based on the information collected, a majority of OAR are retained by the centers among those proposed by the manufacturers, validating the usefulness of DL-based models to decrease clinicians' workload. Target volumes, with the exception of lymph node areas in breast, head and neck and pelvic regions, whole breast, breast wall, prostate and seminal vesicles, are not available in the three commercial solutions at this time. No implemented workflows are currently available to continuously improve the models, but these can be adapted/retrained in some solutions during the commissioning phase to best fit local practices. In reported experiences, automatic workflows were implemented to limit human interactions and make the workflow more fluid. Recommendations published by the ESTRO group will be of importance for guiding physicists in the clinical implementation of patient specific and regular quality assurances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the impact of computed tomography (CT) image acquisition and reconstruction parameters, including slice thickness, pixel size, and dose, on automatic contouring algorithms. Methods: Eleven scans from patients with head‐and‐neck cancer were reconstructed with varying slice thicknesses and pixel sizes. CT dose was varied by adding noise using low‐dose simulation software. The impact of these imaging parameters on two in‐house auto‐contouring algorithms, one convolutional neural network (CNN)‐based and one multiatlas‐based system (MACS) was investigated for 183 reconstructed scans. For each algorithm, auto‐contours for organs‐at‐risk were compared with auto‐contours from scans with 3 mm slice thickness, 0.977 mm pixel size, and 100% CT dose using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and mean surface distance (MSD). Results: Increasing the slice thickness from baseline value of 3 mm gave a progressive reduction in DSC and an increase in HD and MSD on average for all structures. Reducing the CT dose only had a relatively minimal effect on DSC and HD. The rate of change with respect to dose for both auto‐contouring methods is approximately 0. Changes in pixel size had a small effect on DSC and HD for CNN‐based auto‐contouring with differences in DSC being within 0.07. Small structures had larger deviations from the baseline values than large structures for DSC. The relative differences in HD and MSD between the large and small structures were small. Conclusions: Auto‐contours can deviate substantially with changes in CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters, especially slice thickness and pixel size. The CNN was less sensitive to changes in pixel size, and dose levels than the MACS. The results contraindicated more restrictive values for the parameters should be used than a typical imaging protocol for head‐and‐neck. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To quantify the reliability of a commercially available auto-segmentation tool in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer using serial four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans during conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Eight patients with serial 4DCT scans (n = 44) acquired over the course of radiotherapy were assessed. Each 4DCT had a physician-defined primary tumour manual contour (MC). An auto-contour (AC) and a user-adjusted auto-contour (UA-AC) were created for each scan. Geometric agreement of the AC and the UA-AC to the MC was assessed using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the centre of mass (COM) shift from the MC and the structure volume difference from the MC. Bland Altman analysis was carried out to assess agreement between contouring methods. Dosimetric reliability was assessed by comparison of planning target volume dose coverage on the MC and UA-AC. The time trend analysis of the geometric accuracy measures from the initial planning scan through to the final scan for each patient was evaluated using a Wilcoxon signed ranks test to assess the reliability of the UA-AC over the duration of radiotherapy. User adjustment significantly improved all geometric comparison metrics over the AC alone. Improved agreement was observed in smaller tumours not abutting normal soft tissue and median values for geometric comparisons to the MC for DSC, tumour volume difference and COM offset were 0.80 (range 0.49–0.89), 0.8 cm3 (range 0.0–5.9 cm3) and 0.16 cm (range 0.09–0.69 cm), respectively. There were no significant differences in dose metrics measured from the MC and the UA-AC after Bonferroni correction. Variation in geometric agreement between the MC and the UA-AC were observed over the course of radiotherapy with both DSC (P = 0.035) and COM shift from the MC (ns) worsening. The median tumour volume difference from the MC improved at the later time point. These findings suggest that the UA-AC can produce geometrically and dosimetrically acceptable contours for appropriately selected patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Larger studies are required to confirm the findings. • User-adjustment of auto-contours improves geometric agreement towards the gold standard. • Appropriate case selection improves the accuracy of contours generated. • No significant dosimetric variations measured between PTVs generated from manual contours and user-adjusted auto-contours. • The unique dataset within the study seems to confirm the reliability of user-adjusted contours over time. • Longitudinal auto-contouring may have a role in biologically guided radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Incorporating 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) for gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation is challenging due to varying tumor edge based on the set threshold of the standardized uptake value (SUV). This study aims to determine an optimal SUV threshold that correlates best with the pathological tumor size. Materials and Methods: From January 2013 to July 2014, 25 consecutive patients of operable nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent staging18F-FDG-PET/CT before surgical resection were included in the test cohort and 12 patients in the validation cohort. GTVs were delineated on the staging PET/CT by automatic delineation using various percentage threshold of maximum SUV (SUVmax) and absolute SUV. The maximum pathological tumor diameter was then matched with the maximum auto-delineated tumor diameter with varying SUV thresholds. First-order linear regression and Bland-Altman plots were used to obtain an optimal SUV threshold for each patient. Three radiation oncologists with varying degrees of experiences also delineated GTVs with the visual aid of PET/CT to assess interobserver variation in delineation. Results: In the test set, the mean optimal percentage threshold for GTV was SUVmax of 35.6%±18.6% and absolute SUV of 4.35 ± 1.7. In the validation set, the mean optimal percentage threshold SUV and absolute SUV were 36.9 ± 16.9 and 4.1 ± 1.6, respectively. After a combined analysis of all 37 patients, the mean optimal threshold was 36% ± 17.9% and 4.27 ± 1.7, respectively. Using Bland-Altman plots, auto-contouring with 40% SUVmax and SUV 4 was in greater agreement with the pathological tumor diameter. Conclusion: Automatic GTV delineation on PETCT in NSCLC with percentage threshold SUV of 40% and absolute SUV of 4 correlated best with pathological tumor size. Auto-contouring using these thresholds will increase the precision of radiotherapy contouring of GTV and will save time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We validated an auto-contouring algorithm for heart substructures in lung cancer patients, aiming to establish its accuracy and reliability for radiotherapy (RT) planning. We focus on contouring an amalgamated set of subregions in the base of the heart considered to be a new organ at risk, the cardiac avoidance area (CAA), to enable maximum dose limit implementation in lung RT planning., Methods: The study validates a deep-learning model specifically adapted for auto-contouring the CAA (which includes the right atrium, aortic valve root, and proximal segments of the left and right coronary arteries). Geometric, dosimetric, quantitative, and qualitative validation measures are reported. Comparison with manual contours, including assessment of interobserver variability, and robustness testing over 198 cases are also conducted., Results: Geometric validation shows that auto-contouring performance lies within the expected range of manual observer variability despite being slightly poorer than the average of manual observers (mean surface distance for CAA of 1.6 vs 1.2 mm, dice similarity coefficient of 0.86 vs 0.88). Dosimetric validation demonstrates consistency between plans optimized using auto-contours and manual contours. Robustness testing confirms acceptable contours in all cases, with 80% rated as "Good" and the remaining 20% as "Useful.", Conclusions: The auto-contouring algorithm for heart substructures in lung cancer patients demonstrates acceptable and comparable performance to human observers., Advances in Knowledge: Accurate and reliable auto-contouring results for the CAA facilitate the implementation of a maximum dose limit to this region in lung RT planning, which has now been introduced in the routine setting at our institution., Competing Interests: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Institute of Radiology.)

• AI is emerging as a tool for different applications in the radiotherapy workflow. • Overview of commonly used AI-based applications in the radiotherapy workflow. • Recommendations on the clinical implementation in the field of radiotherapy. • Contouring, planning and synthetic CT are discussed in depth. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is currently being introduced into different domains, including medicine. Specifically in radiation oncology, machine learning models allow automation and optimization of the workflow. A lack of knowledge and interpretation of these AI models can hold back wide-spread and full deployment into clinical practice. To facilitate the integration of AI models in the radiotherapy workflow, generally applicable recommendations on implementation and quality assurance (QA) of AI models are presented. For commonly used applications in radiotherapy such as auto-segmentation, automated treatment planning and synthetic computed tomography (sCT) the basic concepts are discussed in depth. Emphasis is put on the commissioning, implementation and case-specific and routine QA of AI models needed for a methodical introduction in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To develop a tool for the automatic contouring of clinical treatment volumes (CTVs) and normal tissues for radiotherapy treatment planning in cervical cancer patients. Methods: An auto‐contouring tool based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) was developed to delineate three cervical CTVs and 11 normal structures (seven OARs, four bony structures) in cervical cancer treatment for use with the Radiation Planning Assistant, a web‐based automatic plan generation system. A total of 2254 retrospective clinical computed tomography (CT) scans from a single cancer center and 210 CT scans from a segmentation challenge were used to train and validate the CNN‐based auto‐contouring tool. The accuracy of the tool was evaluated by calculating the Sørensen‐dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean surface and Hausdorff distances between the automatically generated contours and physician‐drawn contours on 140 internal CT scans. A radiation oncologist scored the automatically generated contours on 30 external CT scans from three South African hospitals. Results: The average DSC, mean surface distance, and Hausdorff distance of our CNN‐based tool were 0.86/0.19 cm/2.02 cm for the primary CTV, 0.81/0.21 cm/2.09 cm for the nodal CTV, 0.76/0.27 cm/2.00 cm for the PAN CTV, 0.89/0.11 cm/1.07 cm for the bladder, 0.81/0.18 cm/1.66 cm for the rectum, 0.90/0.06 cm/0.65 cm for the spinal cord, 0.94/0.06 cm/0.60 cm for the left femur, 0.93/0.07 cm/0.66 cm for the right femur, 0.94/0.08 cm/0.76 cm for the left kidney, 0.95/0.07 cm/0.84 cm for the right kidney, 0.93/0.05 cm/1.06 cm for the pelvic bone, 0.91/0.07 cm/1.25 cm for the sacrum, 0.91/0.07 cm/0.53 cm for the L4 vertebral body, and 0.90/0.08 cm/0.68 cm for the L5 vertebral bodies. On average, 80% of the CTVs, 97% of the organ at risk, and 98% of the bony structure contours in the external test dataset were clinically acceptable based on physician review. Conclusions: Our CNN‐based auto‐contouring tool performed well on both internal and external datasets and had a high rate of clinical acceptability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To quantify interobserver variation (IOV) in target volume and organs-at-risk (OAR) contouring across 31 institutions in breast cancer cases and to explore the clinical utility of deep learning (DL)-based auto-contouring in reducing potential IOV. In phase 1, two breast cancer cases were randomly selected and distributed to multiple institutions for contouring six clinical target volumes (CTVs) and eight OAR. In Phase 2, auto-contour sets were generated using a previously published DL Breast segmentation model and were made available for all participants. The difference in IOV of submitted contours in phases 1 and 2 was investigated quantitatively using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). The qualitative analysis involved using contour heat maps to visualize the extent and location of these variations and the required modification. Over 800 pairwise comparisons were analysed for each structure in each case. Quantitative phase 2 metrics showed significant improvement in the mean DSC (from 0.69 to 0.77) and HD (from 34.9 to 17.9 mm). Quantitative analysis showed increased interobserver agreement in phase 2, specifically for CTV structures (5–19 %), leading to fewer manual adjustments. Underlying IOV differences causes were reported using a questionnaire and hierarchical clustering analysis based on the volume of CTVs. DL-based auto-contours improved the contour agreement for OARs and CTVs significantly, both qualitatively and quantitatively, suggesting its potential role in minimizing radiation therapy protocol deviation. • We investigated the utility of a breast cancer deep-learning auto-contouring model. • Greater interobserver agreement in target volume and organs-at-risk was achieved. • Deep-learning models may reduce clinical trial radiation therapy protocol deviation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In this study, publicly datasets with organs at risk (OAR) structures were used as reference data to compare the differences of several observers. Convolutional neural network (CNN)-based auto-contouring was also used in the analysis. We evaluated the variations among observers and the effect of CNN-based auto-contouring in clinical applications.Materials and methods: A total of 60 publicly available lung cancer CT with structures were used; 48 cases were used for training, and the other 12 cases were used for testing. The structures of the datasets were used as reference data. Three observers and a CNN-based program performed contouring for 12 testing cases, and the 3D dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean surface distance (MSD) were used to evaluate differences from the reference data. The three observers edited the CNN-based contours, and the results were compared to those of manual contouring. A value of P

Background: While atlas segmentation (AS) has proven to be a time-saving and promising method for radiation therapy contouring, optimal methods for its use have not been well-established. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between the size of the atlas patient population and the atlas segmentation auto contouring (AC) performance.Methods: A total of 110 patients' head planning CT images were selected. The mandible and thyroid were selected for this study. The mandibles and thyroids of the patient population were carefully segmented by two skilled clinicians. Of the 110 patients, 100 random patients were registered to 5 different atlas libraries as atlas patients, in groups of 20 to 100, with increments of 20. AS was conducted for each of the remaining 10 patients, either by simultaneous atlas segmentation (SAS) or independent atlas segmentation (IAS). The AS duration of each target patient was recorded. To validate the accuracy of the generated contours, auto contours were compared to manually generated contours (MC) using a volume-overlap-dependent metric, Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and a distance-dependent metric, Hausdorff Distance (HD).Results: In both organs, as the population increased from n = 20 to n = 60, the results showed better convergence. Generally, independent cases produced better performance than simultaneous cases. For the mandible, the best performance was achieved by n = 60 [DSC = 0.92 (0.01) and HD = 6.73 (1.31) mm] and the worst by n = 100 [DSC = 0.90 (0.03) and HD = 10.10 (6.52) mm] atlas libraries. Similar results were achieved with the thyroid; the best performance was achieved by n = 60 [DSC = 0.79 (0.06) and HD = 10.17 (2.89) mm] and the worst by n = 100 [DSC = 0.72 (0.13) and HD = 12.88 (3.94) mm] atlas libraries. Both IAS and SAS showed similar results. Manual contouring of the mandible and thyroid required an average of 1,044 (±170.15) seconds, while AS required an average of 46.4 (±2.8) seconds.Conclusions: The performance of AS AC generally increased as the population of the atlas library increased. However, the performance does not drastically vary in the larger atlas libraries in contrast to the logic that bigger atlas library should lead to better results. In fact, the results do not vary significantly toward the larger atlas library. It is necessary for the institutions to independently research the optimal number of subjects.

Background: In this study, publicly datasets with organs at risk (OAR) structures were used as reference data to compare the differences of several observers. Convolutional neural network (CNN)-based auto-contouring was also used in the analysis. We evaluated the variations among observers and the effect of CNN-based auto-contouring in clinical applications. Materials and methods: A total of 60 publicly available lung cancer CT with structures were used; 48 cases were used for training, and the other 12 cases were used for testing. The structures of the datasets were used as reference data. Three observers and a CNN-based program performed contouring for 12 testing cases, and the 3D dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean surface distance (MSD) were used to evaluate differences from the reference data. The three observers edited the CNN-based contours, and the results were compared to those of manual contouring. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Compared to the reference data, no statistically significant differences were observed for the DSCs and MSDs among the manual contouring performed by the three observers at the same institution for the heart, esophagus, spinal cord, and left and right lungs. The 95% confidence interval (CI) and P -values of the CNN-based auto-contouring results comparing to the manual results for the heart, esophagus, spinal cord, and left and right lungs were as follows: the DSCs were CNN vs. A: 0.914~0.939(P = 0.004), 0.746~0.808(P = 0.002), 0.866~0.887(P = 0.136), 0.952~0.966(P = 0.158) and 0.960~0.972 (P = 0.136); CNN vs. B: 0.913~0.936 (P = 0.002), 0.745~0.807 (P = 0.005), 0.864~0.894 (P = 0.239), 0.952~0.964 (P = 0.308), and 0.959~0.971 (P = 0.272); and CNN vs. C: 0.912~0.933 (P = 0.004), 0.748~0.804(P = 0.002), 0.867~0.890 (P = 0.530), 0.952~0.964 (P = 0.308), and 0.958~0.970 (P = 0.480), respectively. The P -values of MSDs are similar to DSCs. The P -values of heart and esophagus is smaller than 0.05. No significant differences were found between the edited CNN-based auto-contouring results and the manual results. Conclusion: For the spinal cord, both lungs, no statistically significant differences were found between CNN-based auto-contouring and manual contouring. Further modifications to contouring of the heart and esophagus are necessary. Overall, editing based on CNN-based auto-contouring can effectively shorten the contouring time without affecting the results. CNNs have considerable potential for automatic contouring applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: While atlas segmentation (AS) has proven to be a time-saving and promising method for radiation therapy contouring, optimal methods for its use have not been well-established. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between the size of the atlas patient population and the atlas segmentation auto contouring (AC) performance. Methods: A total of 110 patients' head planning CT images were selected. The mandible and thyroid were selected for this study. The mandibles and thyroids of the patient population were carefully segmented by two skilled clinicians. Of the 110 patients, 100 random patients were registered to 5 different atlas libraries as atlas patients, in groups of 20 to 100, with increments of 20. AS was conducted for each of the remaining 10 patients, either by simultaneous atlas segmentation (SAS) or independent atlas segmentation (IAS). The AS duration of each target patient was recorded. To validate the accuracy of the generated contours, auto contours were compared to manually generated contours (MC) using a volume-overlap-dependent metric, Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and a distance-dependent metric, Hausdorff Distance (HD). Results: In both organs, as the population increased from n = 20 to n = 60, the results showed better convergence. Generally, independent cases produced better performance than simultaneous cases. For the mandible, the best performance was achieved by n = 60 [DSC = 0.92 (0.01) and HD = 6.73 (1.31) mm] and the worst by n = 100 [DSC = 0.90 (0.03) and HD = 10.10 (6.52) mm] atlas libraries. Similar results were achieved with the thyroid; the best performance was achieved by n = 60 [DSC = 0.79 (0.06) and HD = 10.17 (2.89) mm] and the worst by n = 100 [DSC = 0.72 (0.13) and HD = 12.88 (3.94) mm] atlas libraries. Both IAS and SAS showed similar results. Manual contouring of the mandible and thyroid required an average of 1,044 (±170.15) seconds, while AS required an average of 46.4 (±2.8) seconds. Conclusions: The performance of AS AC generally increased as the population of the atlas library increased. However, the performance does not drastically vary in the larger atlas libraries in contrast to the logic that bigger atlas library should lead to better results. In fact, the results do not vary significantly toward the larger atlas library. It is necessary for the institutions to independently research the optimal number of subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atlas-based segmentation is used in radiotherapy planning to accelerate the delineation of organs at risk (OARs). Atlas selection has been proposed to improve the performance of segmentation, assuming that the more similar the atlas is to the patient, the better the result. It follows that the larger the database of atlases from which to select, the better the results should be. This paper seeks to estimate a clinically achievable expected performance under this assumption. Assuming a perfect atlas selection, an extreme value theory has been applied to estimate the accuracy of single-atlas and multi-atlas segmentation given a large database of atlases. For this purpose, clinical contours of most common OARs on computed tomography of the head and neck (${N}=\textsf {316}$) and thoracic (${N}=\textsf {280}$) cases were used. This paper found that while for most organs, perfect segmentation cannot be reasonably expected, auto-contouring performance of a level corresponding to clinical quality could be consistently expected given a database of 5000 atlases under the assumption of perfect atlas selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]