Rahim Mehrabi, Ronald P. de Vries, Andrea Aerts, Hui Sun, Pierre J. G. M. de Wit, Erwin Datema, M. Shahjahan Kabir, Richard C. Hamelin, Anthony Levasseur, Kamel A. Abd-Elsalam, Erika Lindquist, Ali H. Bahkali, Igor V. Grigoriev, Henriek G. Beenen, Murray P. Cox, Rosie E. Bradshaw, Alla Lapidus, Scott A. Griffiths, Ioannis Stergiopoulos, Pranav Chettri, Bernard Henrissat, Elio Schijlen, Robin A. Ohm, Yanan Guo, Sylvia Klaubauf, Roeland C. H. J. van Ham, Austen R. D. Ganley, Jérôme Collemare, Shuguang Zhang, Braham Dhillon, Bilal Ökmen, Gert H. J. Kema, Ate van der Burgt, Arne Schwelm, Timothy J. Owen, Harrold A. van den Burg, Asaf Salamov, Mansoor Karimi Jashni, Stephen B. Goodwin, Green Life Sciences, Molecular Plant Pathology (SILS, FNWI), Phytopathol Lab, Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Ctr BioSyst Genom, Lab Bioinformat, Dept Plant Pathol, University of California [Davis] (UC Davis), University of California (UC)-University of California (UC), Agr Res Ctr, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Joint Genome Inst, United States Department of Energy, King Saud University [Riyadh] (KSU), Architecture et fonction des macromolécules biologiques (AFMB), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques (BBF), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-École Centrale de Marseille (ECM), Wageningen University, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Centre for Biosystems Genomics, European Research Area-Plant Genomics, Willie Commelin Scholten Foundation, Graduate School of Experimental Plant Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand Bio-Protection Research Centre, Royal Society of New Zealand, Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231], European Project: 27649,ERA-PG, University of California-University of California, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Wageningen University and Research Centre [Wageningen] (WUR), and École Centrale de Marseille (ECM)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
We sequenced and compared the genomes of the Dothideomycete fungal plant pathogens Cladosporium fulvum (Cfu) (syn. Passalora fulva) and Dothistroma septosporum (Dse) that are closely related phylogenetically, but have different lifestyles and hosts. Although both fungi grow extracellularly in close contact with host mesophyll cells, Cfu is a biotroph infecting tomato, while Dse is a hemibiotroph infecting pine. The genomes of these fungi have a similar set of genes (70% of gene content in both genomes are homologs), but differ significantly in size (Cfu >61.1-Mb; Dse 31.2-Mb), which is mainly due to the difference in repeat content (47.2% in Cfu versus 3.2% in Dse). Recent adaptation to different lifestyles and hosts is suggested by diverged sets of genes. Cfu contains an α-tomatinase gene that we predict might be required for detoxification of tomatine, while this gene is absent in Dse. Many genes encoding secreted proteins are unique to each species and the repeat-rich areas in Cfu are enriched for these species-specific genes. In contrast, conserved genes suggest common host ancestry. Homologs of Cfu effector genes, including Ecp2 and Avr4, are present in Dse and induce a Cf-Ecp2- and Cf-4-mediated hypersensitive response, respectively. Strikingly, genes involved in production of the toxin dothistromin, a likely virulence factor for Dse, are conserved in Cfu, but their expression differs markedly with essentially no expression by Cfu in planta. Likewise, Cfu has a carbohydrate-degrading enzyme catalog that is more similar to that of necrotrophs or hemibiotrophs and a larger pectinolytic gene arsenal than Dse, but many of these genes are not expressed in planta or are pseudogenized. Overall, comparison of their genomes suggests that these closely related plant pathogens had a common ancestral host but since adapted to different hosts and lifestyles by a combination of differentiated gene content, pseudogenization, and gene regulation., Author Summary We compared the genomes of two closely related pathogens with very different lifestyles and hosts: C. fulvum (Cfu), a biotroph of tomato, and D. septosporum (Dse), a hemibiotroph of pine. Some differences in gene content were identified that can be directly related to their different hosts, such as the presence of a gene involved in degradation of a tomato saponin only in Cfu. However, in general the two species share a surprisingly large proportion of genes. Dse has functional homologs of Cfu effector genes, while Cfu has genes for biosynthesis of dothistromin, a toxin probably associated with virulence in Dse. Cfu also has an unexpectedly large content of genes for biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites and degradation of plant cell walls compared to Dse, contrasting with its host preference and lifestyle. However, many of these genes were not expressed in planta or were pseudogenized. These results suggest that evolving species may retain genetic signatures of the host and lifestyle preferences of their ancestor and that evolution of new genes, gene regulation, and pseudogenization are important factors in adaptation.