Search

By ene-reaction of 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione with double bonds, polar 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazolidine-3,5-dione (phenyl urazole) groups are introduced into unpolar matrices. Hydrogen-bond complexes are formed between two amide-like units. The temperature dependence of complex formation in dilute hydrocarbon medium is obtained from remperature-dependent IR spectra in the region of the C=O stretching vibration. Results obtained for a low molecular-weight model system are compared with modified polybutadienes, where the groups are attached statistically along the polymer backbone. The enthalpy and the entropy of complex formation (Δ H =−28.6 kJ/mol; Δ S =−52 J/mol K) obtained for the low molecular-weight model prove a dimeric chelate like complex involving two hydrogen bonds. The lower equilibrium constants observed for the groups attached to the polymer are related to additional topological constraints emerging from the polymer backbone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Background: Recent analyses have shown that in health services research in Germany, healthcare organisations are often considered primarily as a study setting, without fully taking their complex organisational nature into account, neither theoretically nor methodologically. Therefore, an initiative was launched to analyse the state of Organisational Health Services Research (OHSR) in Germany and to develop a strategic framework and road map to guide future efforts in the field. This paper summarizes positions that have been jointly developed by consulting experts from the interdisciplinary and international scientific community., Methods: In July 2023, a scoping workshop over the course of three days was held with 32 (inter)national experts from different research fields centred around OHSR topics using interactive workshop methods. Participants discussed their perspectives on OHSR, analysed current challenges in OHSR in Germany and developed key positions for the field's development., Results: The seven agreed-upon key positions addressed conceptual and strategic aspects. There was consensus that the field required the development of a research agenda that can guide future efforts. On a conceptual level, the need to address challenges in terms of interdisciplinarity, terminology, organisation(s) as research subjects, international comparative research and utilisation of organisational theory was recognized. On a strategic level, requirements with regard to teaching, promotion of interdisciplinary and international collaboration, suitable funding opportunities and participatory research were identified., Conclusions: This position paper seeks to serve as a framework to support further development of OHSR in Germany and as a guide for researchers and funding organisations on how to move OHSR forward. Some of the challenges discussed for German OHSR are equally present in other countries. Thus, this position paper can be used to initiate fruitful discussions in other countries., Competing Interests: LA ist Vorstandsmitglied der DGMS und des DNVF. Sie ist Mitglied des Editorial Boards des Journal of Health Care Services and Implementation. JB erhält Fördermittel für mehrere OVF-Projekte in Australien und Europa. ME ist Vorsitzender der Society for Studies in Organizing Healthcare (SHOC). Die Arbeit des Instituts für Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, wird durch einen zweckungebundenen Zuschuss des Arbeitgeberverbands der Metall- und Elektroindustrie Baden-Württemberg (Südwestmetall) unterstützt. Die übrigen Autor*innen erklären, dass keine Interessenkonflikte bestehen., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Objectives: Within the last 2 decades, numerous interventions making use of high-reliability theory have been implemented to increase reliability in healthcare organizations. This systematic literature review first explores the concrete goals on which such interventions focus. Second, the review captures how the achievement of these goals, or alternatively a change, generally an increase in organizational reliability, is measured across different contexts., Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Academic Search Ultimate, Business SourcePremier, CINAHL, Communication Source, EconLit, ERIC, Medline, Political Science Complete, PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, PSYNDEX, SocINDEX (via the resource hosterEbscoHost), and Web of Science (through November 22, 2021). Peer-reviewed, English language studies were included, reporting on the implementation of a concrete intervention to increase reliability in a medical context and referring to high-reliability theory., Results: The search first yielded 8896 references, from which 75 studies were included in the final sample. Important healthcare goals stated by the seminal report "Crossing the Quality Chasm" guided the analysis of the included studies. Most of the studies originated from the United States and report on interventions to increase reliability of either organizational units or whole organizations when aiming for safety (n = 65). Other goals reported on include effectiveness, and much less frequently timeliness, patient centeredness, and efficiency. Fifty-eight studies use quantitative measurement exclusively to account for the achievement of these goals; 7 studies use qualitative measurement exclusively, and 10 studies use a mixed-method approach. The operationalization of goals, including the operationalization of organizational reliability, and measurement methods do not follow a unified approach, despite claiming to be informed by a coherent theory. Instead, such operationalizations strongly depend on the overall objective of the study and the respective context., Conclusions: Measuring the outcomes of high-reliability interventions into healthcare organizations is challenging for different reasons, including the difficult operationalization of partly overlapping goals, the complex, processual nature of achieving reliability, and the limited ability of organizations striving for more reliability if they are already performing on a high level. This review critically assesses the adoption of the goals stated in the seminal report "Crossing the Quality Chasm" and provides insights for organizations and funding providers that strive to evaluate more reliable service provision., Competing Interests: The authors disclose no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Doctor-patient communication is one of the hallmarks of good medical treatment. Mutual understanding is of foremost importance, in particular when communicating non-numerical test results., Methods: Using a two-step approach, this study analyses the influence of wording on the correct understanding of medical test results by people without a medical background. In a first step, a qualitative analysis of physicians' letters helped to identify adjectives that are frequently used to communicate test results. In a second step, a parallel randomised study was conducted to test the comprehensibility of particularly relevant adjectives, combining the written communication of test results with a subsequent survey. 1,131 participants, representing the population of Germany with regard to age, gender, and educational level, were recruited via an online platform. The participants read a scenario involving the communication of the results of a breath test, whereby non-numerical test results were described as being either "positive" vs. "negative" (n=566) or "abnormal" vs. "normal" (n=565). Participant assignment to one of these groups took place in a randomised way. The outcomes measured included the subjective and objective understanding of test results as well as the participants' subjective comprehension of the physician communicating with them., Results: People without a medical background can understand medical test results more readily when neutral, descriptive adjectives are used rather than adjectives considered as being judgmental in everyday language. 54 % of the participants who read test results using the adjectives "positive" vs. "negative" and 65 % of the participants who read test results using the adjectives "abnormal" vs. "normal", respectively, understood the results correctly. This relative difference of 20.4 % in the number of participants with a correct understanding is statistically significant (Chi square=13.061; p=0.001). There was also a considerable difference in the subjective understanding (means of 5.04 of "positive" vs. "negative" and 5.47 for "abnormal" vs. "normal" on a 7-point Likert scale; absolute mean difference 0.42 [95 % CI: 0.20; 0.64]) as well as in the subjective comprehension of the communicating physician (means of 4.49 for "positive" vs. "negative" and 4.95 for "abnormal" vs. "normal" on a 7-point Likert scale; absolute mean difference 0.45 [95% CI: 0.23; 0.67]). A higher level of comprehension for the words "abnormal" vs. "normal" was consistent across the overall sample. It is mainly people with no school-leaving certificate and a lower educational level who benefit from the changed wording., Conclusions: In the process of communicating non-numerical medical test results, people without a medical background understand neutral, descriptive adjectives better than adjectives that are considered judgmental in everyday usage. A corresponding change of written and oral communication can easily be implemented by medical experts in their everyday practice and particularly supports a population group that already suffers disadvantages in the medical system., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Purpose: Many health systems face challenges such as rising costs and lacking quality, both of which can be addressed by improving the integration of different health care sectors and professions. The purpose of this viewpoint is to present the German health care Innovation Fund (IF) initiated by the Federal Government to support the development and diffusion of integrated health care., Design/methodology/approach: This article describes the design and rationale of the IF in detail and provides first insights into its limitations, acceptance and implementation by relevant stakeholders., Findings: In its first period, the IF offered € 1.2 billion as start-up funding for model implementation and evaluation over a period of four years (2016-2019). This period was recently extended to a second round until 2024, offering € 200 million a year as from 2020. The IF is triggering the support of relevant insurers for the development of new integrated care models. In addition, strict evaluation requirements have led to a large number of health service research projects which assess structural and process improvements and thus enable evidence-based policy decisions., Originality/value: This article is the first of its kind to present the German IF to the international readership. The IF is a political initiative through which to foster innovations and promote integrated health care., (© Emerald Publishing Limited.)

AB diblock waterborne copolymers made of styrene (St) and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate (2EHA) were synthesized by means of two-step reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) (mini)emulsion polymerization. Monofunctional asymmetric RAFT agent was used to initiate the polymerization. The hard polystyrene "A" block was synthesized via miniemulsion polymerization followed by 2EHA pre-emulsion feeding to form the soft "B" block. Polymerization kinetics and the evolution of the molecular weight distribution were followed during synthesis of both initial and final block copolymers. DSC measurements of the block copolymers revealed the existence of two glass transition temperatures (Tgs) and thus the occurrence of two-phase systems. Microscopic techniques (atomic force microscopy (AFM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)) were used to study the phase separation within the particles in the latex form, after film formation at room temperature cast directly from the latex and after different post-treatments well above the Tg of the hard-polystyrene domains, when complete particle coalescence had occurred. The morphological differences observed after different annealing temperatures were correlated with the mechanical properties analyzed by DMTA measurements. Finally, the differences found in the mechanical properties of the block copolymers annealed at different temperatures were correlated to their heat seal application results.

High molecular weight waterborne ABA block copolymers of styrene (St) and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate (2EHA) containing hard and soft domains were synthesized by means of RAFT (mini)emulsion polymerization using a bifunctional symmetric S,S -dibenzyl trithiocarbonate (DBTTC) RAFT agent. Miniemulsion polymerization was initially used for the synthesis of the A-block, which forms hard domains, followed by 2EHA pre-emulsion feeding to build the B-block soft domains. Polymerization kinetics and the evolution of the Molecular Weight Distribution (MWD) were followed during the synthesis of different ABA block copolymers. The thermal properties of the final symmetric block copolymers were studied on dried films by means of DSC. It was found that the block copolymers have two glass transitions, which indicates the presence of a two-phase system. Phase separation was investigated by means of microscopic techniques (AFM and TEM) and SAXS, both of the particles in the latex form, as well as after film formation at room temperature and after different post-treatments. Films were annealed at temperatures well above the glass transition temperature ( T g ) of the hard phase to study the bulk morphology of the films after complete particle coalescence. Moreover, for comparison purposes, the films were re-dissolved in THF, and films were again cast directly from the homogeneous THF solutions. As THF is a good solvent for both blocks, such films serve as a reference for the equilibrium morphology. Finally, DMTA studies of the films annealed at different temperatures were performed to correlate the morphology changes with the mechanical properties of the block copolymers.

Introduction: In recent years, inter-organisational collaboration between healthcare organisations has become of increasingly vital importance in order to improve the integration of health service delivery. However, different barriers reported in academic literature seem to hinder the formation and development of such collaboration., Theory and Methods: This systematic literature review of forty studies summarises and categorises the barriers to integrated care in inter-organisational settings as reported in previous studies. It analyses how these barriers operate., Results: Within these studies, twenty types of barriers have been identified and then categorised in six groups (barriers related to administration and regulation, barriers related to funding, barriers related to the inter-organisational domain, barriers related to the organisational domain, barriers related to service delivery, and barriers related to clinical practices). Not all of these barriers emerge passively, some are set up intentionally. They are not only context-specific, but are also often related and influence each other., Discussion and Conclusion: The compilation of these results allows for a better understanding of the characteristics and reasons for the occurrence of barriers that impede collaboration aiming for the integration of care, not only for researchers but also for practitioners. It can help to explain and counteract the slow progress and limited efficiency and effectiveness of some of the inter-organisational collaboration in healthcare settings.

The German E. coli crisis in 2011 posed multifaceted challenges to the actors of the German health care system. This paper analyzes the outbreak from a multidisciplinary perspective. It offers best practices and general recommendations for future public health emergencies for hospitals as well as at the federal and local level, addressing medical practitioners as well as health care managers.