Search

Since their first approval 25 years ago, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become important targeted cancer therapeutics. However, dermatologic toxicities associated with non-immune checkpoint inhibitor (non-ICI) mAbs may complicate the course of cancer treatment. Data on the incidence and types of these reactions are limited.A comprehensive review was conducted on dermatologic toxicities associated with different classes of non-ICI mAbs approved for treatment of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. The review included prospective Phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials; retrospective literature reviews; systematic reviews/meta-analyses; and case series/reports.Dermatologic toxicities were associated with several types of non-ICI mAbs. Inflammatory reactions were the most common dermatologic toxicities, manifesting as maculopapular, urticarial, papulopustular/acneiform, and lichenoid/interface cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) with non-ICI mAbs. Immunobullous reactions were rare and a subset of non-ICI mAbs were associated with the development of vitiligo cAEs.Dermatologic toxicities of non-ICI mAbs are diverse and mostly limited to inflammatory reactions. Awareness of the spectrum of the histopathologic patterns of cAE from non-ICI mAbs therapy is critical in the era of oncodermatology and oncodermatopathology.

ImportanceGiven that mycosis fungoides−cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (MF/CTCL) is chronic, there is a need for additional therapies with minimal short- and long-term adverse effects. Topical synthetic hypericin ointment, 0.25%, activated with visible light is a novel, nonmutagenic photodynamic therapy (PDT).ObjectivesTo determine the efficacy and safety of topical synthetic hypericin ointment, 0.25%, activated with visible light as a nonmutagenic PDT in early-stage MF/CTCL.Design, Settings, and ParticipantsThis was a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, phase 3 randomized clinical trial (FLASH study) conducted from December 2015 to November 2020 at 39 academic and community-based US medical centers. Participants were adults (≥18 years) with early-stage (IA-IIA) MF/CTCL.InterventionsIn cycle 1, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive hypericin or placebo to 3 index lesions twice weekly for 6 weeks. In cycle 2, all patients received the active drug for 6 weeks to index lesions. In cycle 3 (optional), both index and additional lesions received active drug for 6 weeks.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was index lesion response rate (ILRR), defined as 50% or greater improvement in modified Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (mCAILS) score from baseline after 6 weeks of therapy for cycle 1. For cycles 2 and 3, open label response rates were secondary end points. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each treatment visit, after each cycle, and then monthly for 6 months. Data analyses were performed on December 21, 2020.ResultsThe study population comprised 169 patients (mean [SD] age, 58.4 [16.0] years; 96 [57.8%] men; 120 [72.3%] White individuals) with early-stage MF/CTCL. After 6 weeks of treatment, hypericin PDT was more effective than placebo (cycle 1 ILRR, 16% vs 4%; P = .04). The ILRR increased to 40% in patients who received 2 cycles of hypericin PDT (P P Conclusion and RelevanceThe findings of this randomized clinical trial indicate that synthetic hypericin PDT is effective in early-stage patch and plaque MF/CTCL and has a favorable safety profile.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02448381

Background In response to the increased use of combination checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and the resulting increased cutaneous adverse events (CAEs), this study reviewed patients with melanoma treated with combination CPIs to characterize CAE features and their clinical impact, correlation to adverse events in other organs, and correlation to tumor response. Methods Patients from the authors' institutional database who received at least 1 dose of ipilimumab in combination with either nivolumab or pembrolizumab between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, for stage IV or unresectable stage III melanoma were identified. The time to next treatment (TTNT) was calculated from the start of CPI therapy to the start of the next treatment or death, and the development of CAEs was tested in a time-dependent Cox regression to identify associations with TTNT. Results Eighty-one patients (52.3%) experienced a total of 92 CAEs, including eczematous dermatitis (25.0%), morbilliform eruption (22.8%), vitiligo (12.0%), and pruritus without rash (8.7%). The median times to the onset and resolution of CAEs were 21 days (range, 0-341 days) and 50 days (range, 1-352 days), respectively. Most CAEs resolved after patients entered the CPI maintenance phase and treatment with oral antihistamines with or without topical steroids. CPI discontinuation occurred in 4 patients (2.6%) because of CAEs, in 49 (31.6%) because of other immune-related adverse events, and in 20 (12.9%) because of melanoma progression or death. For patients definitively treated with CPIs (n = 134; 86.5%), TTNT was significantly longer with CAEs than without CAEs (hazard ratio, 0.567; 95% CI, 0.331-0.972; P = .039). Conclusions CAEs were mostly reversible and rarely required therapy discontinuation. The development of CAEs was associated with a longer TTNT, and this suggested a possible clinical benefit.

The CCR4-directed monoclonal antibody mogamulizumab has been shown to significantly improve progression-free survival and overall response rate compared with vorinostat in adults with relapsed/refractory mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SS). One of the most common adverse events seen with mogamulizumab in MF/SS patients is rash. Because of the protean nature of MF/SS and the variable clinical and histopathological features of mogamulizumab-associated rash, healthcare providers may have difficulty distinguishing rash from disease, and may not be aware of appropriate treatment strategies for this generally manageable adverse event. The objective of this report was to combine results from published literature with experiences and recommendations from multiple investigators and institutions into clinical best practice recommendations to assist healthcare providers in identifying and managing mogamulizumab-associated rash. Optimal management, which includes biopsy confirmation and steroid treatment, requires a multidisciplinary approach among oncology, dermatology, and pathology practitioners. INFOGRAPHIC.

Purpose Treatment options for corticosteroid-refractory and/or high-grade checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-induced cutaneous adverse events (CAEs) are limited; however, anecdotal reports of biologic therapies have been successful. We aim to characterize the appropriate treatment scenarios and safety and efficacy profiles of biologics used to treat patients with CPI-induced CAEs at a single institution. Methods This is a retrospective case series of patients from January 1st, 2015 to October 20th, 2020, with CPI-induced CAEs who were treated with biologics at a single cancer center. Patients were identified using institutional electronic medical record who underwent CPI therapy with subsequent CAEs that necessitated biologic therapy. Diagnostic criteria utilized for CAEs were based on documentation by four board-certified dermatologists, in combination with detailed chart reviews and pathology findings. Primary study outcome measurements include CAE response, tumor response, and adverse events during biologics treatment. Results We identified 17 patients who fit study criteria. Sixteen patients experienced some degree of CAE improvement on biologics, with 10 of 10 patients reaching CAE resolution at 6 months post biologics. Eight patients needed new systemic treatment post biologics treatment, while 9 patients received no further treatment or stayed on the CPI. Thirteen patients tolerated biologics well with no significant adverse events or blood abnormalities, with only 2 patients experiencing biologic dose delays. Conclusion In our cohort, biologics appear to be extremely efficacious in the treatment of severe-grade and/or steroid refractory CAEs. They also appeared to be well-tolerated without overtly negative effects on tumor response. In patients with limited cancer treatment options and good tumor response to CPIs, biologics should be considered for severe-grade and/or refractory CAEs.

Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas pose a diagnostic challenge for dermatopathologists, hematopathologists, and general surgical pathologists. Recognition of gamma/delta phenotype in cutaneous T proliferations has been enhanced by the availability of antibodies against TCRgamma and delta for immunohistochemistry. Thus, reporting gamma/delta phenotype in a cutaneous T-cell lymphoid proliferation may indicate a significant change in therapy and a challenge for dermatologists and oncologists who treat these patients. Herein, we discuss primary cutaneous gamma/delta T-cell lymphoma, its differential diagnosis, and other skin lymphoid proliferations that may show gamma/delta phenotype. Awareness of the occurrence of gamma/delta phenotype in both T-cell lymphomas and benign lymphoid proliferations involving skin is crucial for a better interpretation of histopathologic findings. Integration of clinical presentation, morphology, immunoprofile, and molecular findings is key for a correct diagnosis and appropriate therapy of lesions displaying gamma/delta T-cell phenotype.

Mycosis fungoides with large cell transformation (MFLCT) can be difficult to distinguish from primary cutaneous CD30+ T cell lymphoproliferative disorders (PC CD30+ LPD), especially primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PC-ALCL). This diagnostic distinction is critical for appropriate patient management. GATA3 has been proposed to be useful in the discrimination between these two entities. We identified 25 cases of MFLCT and 24 cases of PC CD30+ LPDs (including lymphomatoid papulosis (n=14), PC-ALCL (n=6), and CD30+ LPD, not otherwise specified (n=4)) diagnosed at our institution from 2002 to 2019. Sections from archived specimens were stained to evaluate for GATA3 expression by immunohistochemistry and compared among cutaneous CD30+ T cell LPDs. The majority of the MFLCT cohort had strong, diffuse expression of GATA3 ranging from 0 to 100% of dermal T cells (mean 53.20%) with 15/25 cases (60%) showing GATA3 expression greater than 50%, while the PC CD30+ LPD group showed variable, moderate GATA3 labeling ranging from 0 to 60% of dermal T cells (mean 23.26%), with 5/6 cases (83%) showing GATA3 expression less than 40% (p =0.003). The calculated sensitivity and specificity were 56% and 74%, while positive and negative predictive values were 70% and 61%, respectively. Based on the percent staining of positive cells, using 50% as a cutoff value for expression, GATA3 might be a useful immunohistochemical marker to discriminate MFLCT from PC CD30+ LPDs, including PC-ALCL.

BACKGROUND Blood involvement by mycosis fungoides (MF)/Sezary syndrome (SS) influences prognosis and therapeutic decisions. MF/SS blood stage is currently determined by absolute CD4 + CD26- or CD4 + CD7-cell counts, which quantification method may overestimate MF/SS by including CD26- or CD7- normal CD4+ T-cells, or underestimate disease burden when MF/SS cells show incomplete loss of CD26 and/or CD7. Recently, through the standardization effort led by the International Clinical Cytometry Society (ICCS), recommendation was made to quantify MF/SS by enumerating immunophenotypically aberrant CD4+ T-cells, rather than CD26- or CD7- in isolation. METHODS We compared these two quantitation methods in 309 MF/SS patients who had blood samples analyzed by flow cytometry immunophenotyping (FCI) over a 1-year period. RESULTS Using the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) criteria, 221 (71.5%) patients had a blood stage corresponding to B0, 57 (18.4%) to B1, and 31 (10%) to B2. By FCI analysis, a total of 62 patients (20.0%) were found positive for MF/SS. Among EORTC B0 patients, 11/221 (5%) were positive by FCI (false negatives), and among EORTC Stage B1 patients, 35/57 (61%) were negative by FCI (false positives). Regarding patients positive for MF/SS cells by FCI, there was an overall excellent correlation (r = .999, p

Background: T cell lymphomas (TCL) have been known to exhibit epigenetic dysregulation and aberrant cell signaling. Tenalisib (RP6530), a highly selective PI3K δ/γ+SIK3 inhibitor has shown clinically promising activity as a single agent in TCL with a differentiated and favorable safety profile. In vitro studies in TCL cell lines showed increased apoptosis when tenalisib was combined with romidepsin (Rhizen data on file). A Phase I/II study of tenalisib in combination with romidepsin was designed to assess safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy in relapsed/refractory TCL (NCT03770000). Methods: This is a multi-center, open label, Phase I/II study in patients with T cell lymphoma (PTCL and CTCL). The Phase I is a 3+3 dose escalation study to determine the MTD/optimal dose. The Phase II is an expansion cohort at the MTD/optimal dose of the combination. Tenalisib was administered orally at doses of 400, 600 and 800 mg BID in combination with romidepsin (12 &14 mg/m2, Q3W). The objectives of the study are to establish safety, MTD/optimal dose, pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor activity of the combination. We report the dose escalation results and preliminary data from the expansion cohorts. Results: A total 15 patients were enrolled between July 24, 2019 and July 20, 2020. Baseline demographics are presented in Table 1. Patients had a median of 3 (range; 1-17) prior treatments and 11 (73%) were refractory to their last therapy. About 67% (6/9) of CTCL patients had prior mogamulizumab therapy. No DLT was reported in the dose escalation phase and Tenalisib 800 mg BID+ Romidepsin 14 mg/m2, Q3W was considered as the optimal dose for expansion cohorts. PK analysis showed linear and dose-dependent kinetics for tenalisib. Co-administration of romidepsin along with tenalisib did not significantly alter the mutual PK of either agents. Fifteen patients were assessed for safety. Most common treatment emergent adverse events of any grade were nausea (33%), thrombocytopenia (33%) and fatigue (27%). Related ≥ Grade 3 AEs were seen in 5 (33%) patients. These included thrombocytopenia (7%), atrial fibrillation (7%) and pyrexia (7%) which were related to romidepsin while anemia (7%) neutropenia (7%) and rash (7%) were considered related to the combination. There were no instances of transaminitis or colitis. None of the TEAEs led to study discontinuation. Patients from the dose escalation cohorts (n=9) were evaluated for response. Three patients (3/9) showed complete response (CR), 4 patients (4/9) showed stable disease (SD) while 2 patients (2/9) had progressive disease (PD). Out of the three responders, two were PTCL (AITL) patients, one of which is planned for transplantation, while the third patient was a CTCL (Sezary syndrome) patient who had progressed on prior mogamulizumab therapy. This patient showed rapid reduction of Sezary cell count after 2 cycles of treatment. Three patients (2 CR, 1 SD) are currently ongoing with a median duration of response being 9.0 (range; 7.6-10.5+) months. The expansion cohort has 6 patients and is currently enrolling. Conclusions: The combination of tenalisib and romidepsin demonstrates a favorable safety profile and promising indicators of combined anti-tumour activity in patients with R/R TCL. The expansion cohort in CTCL and PTCL is currently underway to validate these encouraging early results. Updated results will be presented during the ASH meeting. Disclosures Iyer: Afffimed: Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Curio Biosciences: Honoraria; Trillium: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Target Oncology: Honoraria; Spectrum: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; CRISPR: Research Funding. Huen:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding; Helsinn: Consultancy; Medivir: Research Funding. Haverkos:Viracta THerapeutics: Consultancy. Ai:ADC Therapeutics, Kymera: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nurix Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kuzel:Eselixis, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genomic Health: Honoraria; Sanofi/Genzyme: Honoraria; Bioarray: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Marck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alderuccio:ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Inovio Pharmaceuticals: Other: Family member; Foundation Medicine: Other: Family member; Puma Biotechnology: Other: Family member; Forma Therapeutics: Other: Family member; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Other: Family member; Oncinfo: Honoraria; OncLive: Honoraria. Stevens:Amgen, MorphoSys: Consultancy. Feldman:Viracta: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Eisai: Research Funding. Jagadeesh:Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Debiopharm Group: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding. Reddy:KITE Pharma, Abbvie, BMS, Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech, BMS: Research Funding. Routhu:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A>.: Current Employment. Barde:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A: Current Employment. Nair:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Current Employment.

Erythroderma can occur in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) prevalence is increased in CTCL patients and contributes to CTCL disease flares. Our primary aim was to describe S. aureus infections, including resistance patterns and the antibiotic treatment regimens used, in erythrodermic CTCL patients. This was a retrospective chart review of erythrodermic CTCL patients who had S. aureus infection or colonization and were treated at the UT MD Anderson Cancer Center's Melanoma Skin Center between 2012 and 2016. Twenty-six erythrodermic CTCL patients had 50 documented S. aureus colonization or infection events. Patients had an improvement in body surface area (BSA) or modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) in 53% events treated for S. aureus. Seventeen of the 50 (34%) events were due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). One-third (33%) of MRSA events were initially treated with dicloxacillin. The MRSA isolates were sensitive to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (92%) and doxycycline (88%). Patients treated in the outpatient setting (OR 0.073; 95% CI 0.008-0.627; p = 0.017) and patients with a previous history of topical anti-S. aureus decolonization treatments before S. aureus event as stand-alone (OR 0.125; 95% CI 0.018-0.887; p = 0.038) or in combination treatment with systemic antibiotics (OR 0.094; 95% CI 0.009-0.944; p = 0.045) were less likely to see improvement in BSA or mSWAT from S. aureus treatment. Treatment of S. aureus improved CTCL skin score in a high number of erythrodermic patients. The MRSA prevalence was high in erythrodermic CTCL patients. Clinicians should consider using empiric MRSA antibiotic coverage for these patients.

Background: Disease relapse is common with peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) or cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL). Adoptive immunotherapy with CD19 directed CAR-T cells is a standard option for B cell lymphoid malignancies in the relapsed setting. This study assesses the safety and preliminary efficacy of CD4 targeting autologous CAR-T, LB1901, in patients (pts) with CD4+ relapsed or refractory (R/R) TCL. A pre-clinical study showed LB1901 exhibited potent anti-tumor activity without off-target effects (Zeng 2021). Methods: This is a phase 1, open-label, multicenter, multicohort study of LB1901 (NCT04712864; currently enrolling). Eligible pts are ≥18 years with histologically confirmed CD4+ PTCL-NOS (not otherwise specified); or CD4+ AITL (angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma); or CD4+ CTCL (either MF [mycosis fungoides] or SS [Sézary syndrome]). In Part A (dose escalation), pts with SS must have ≤2,000 circulating Sézary cells/µL to ensure safety of pts with higher disease burden. In Part B, pts with >2,000 Sézary cells/µL is allowed. CD4 expressed on tumor cells must be confirmed within 3 months prior to apheresis. Other inclusion criteria include: R/R disease with ≥2 prior lines of systemic antineoplastic therapy; for pts with PTCL-NOS or AITL, ≥1 measurable lesion according to IWG Response Criteria (Cheson 2014) and for pts with CTCL, ≥stage IIB on TNMB-ISLC/EORTC staging system; identified HSCT donor available prior to enrollment (in the event of severe recurrent infections and prolonged lymphopenia for which pt may need an allogeneic HSCT as a safety rescue); and ECOG status of 0 or 1. Response will be evaluated based on IWG response criteria for PTCL and Global Composite Response for CTCL (Olsen 2007). The study will be conducted in 2 parts (Part A: dose escalation and Part B: dose expansion). Three dose levels (0.3 X 106, 1.0 X 106, and 3.0 X 106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) will be evaluated (N=3-6 for each dose level) with an optional dose level minus 1 (0.1 X 106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg). Part B will include 2 cohorts, PTCL and CTCL (N=12-20 for each), after the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) has been identified in Part A. Enrolled pts will undergo apheresis for PBMC collection. LB1901 will be manufactured from autologous CD8+ T cells. Pts may receive optional bridging therapy and receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy with fludarabine 30mg/m2/day and cyclophosphamide 300mg/m2/day (Flu-Cy), for 3 days followed by LB1901. Primary endpoints are incidence, duration, and severity of AEs and laboratory abnormalities (Parts A and B) and DLT at each dose level (Part A). Secondary endpoints include overall response rate; duration of response; CAR-positive T cell counts and CAR transgene level in blood; and presence of anti-CAR antibody response. Exploratory endpoints include preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and CD4+ T cell counts. Citation Format: Swaminathan P. lyer, David G. Maloney, Nora Bennani, Auris Huen, Muhammad Akram, Soo Kim, Chuan Wang, Zhiyin Liang, Henry Castro, Lida Pacaud, Mehdi Hamadani. LB1901: A phase 1, open-label, multicenter, multicohort study of CD4-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CD4-CAR-T) in relapsed or refractory T-cell lymphoma (TCL) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT215.

Context Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are rare non-Hodgkin lymphomas that present in skin and include mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SS) subsets. Leukemic involvement is an independent prognostic factor affecting overall and disease-specific survival and increasing the risk of disease progression (Agar 2010, Am Soc J Clin Oncol). CTCL has serious negative effects on patient quality of life (QoL). Therefore, treatment goals include reducing the burden of disease, delaying progression, and improving or preserving QoL. Objective This post hoc analysis of MAVORIC trial data sought to determine whether baseline blood tumor burden affected treatment effects on patient QoL. Design The Phase 3 MAVORIC trial (NCT01728805) compared vorinostat 400 mg daily PO to mogamulizumab 1.0 mg/kg weekly for the first 28-day cycle, then on days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) analysis of health-related QoL (HRQoL) was performed using the validated Skindex-29 and FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) instruments. Pruritus was assessed using ItchyQoL and Pruritus Likert scales. All PROs were administered at baseline; Skindex-29 and FACT-G were then administered at every other treatment visit (Cycle 1, 3, 5, …), and ItchyQoL and Pruritus Likert scales were administered every 4 weeks at each cycle. Results Overall, no statistically significant differences between mogamulizumab and vorinostat were seen for patients without blood involvement. Statistically significant differences were seen for patients with blood involvement, with mogamulizumab-treated patients seeing statistically significant improvement in Skindex-29 for treatment Cycles 3–11 in all domains (emotional, functional, symptoms) and in the functional domain of ItchyQoL at most time points. In mogamulizumab-treated patients with blood involvement, the Pruritus Likert Scale score showed a reduction in itch from Cycle 1 and a trend toward reducing levels of itch over 12 cycles. The FACT-G Total Score showed the greatest improvement from baseline for mogamulizumab-treated patients with blood involvement compared to those without blood involvement and all vorinostat-treated patients. Conclusions Mogamulizumab patients with blood involvement saw greater HRQoL improvement than those without blood involvement. Mogamulizumab offers QoL benefit, assessed across a number of PROs, especially to patients with blood involvement (B1 or B2). Supported by Kyowa Kirin, Inc.

Sézary syndrome (SS) and mycosis fungoides (MF), 2 types of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, cause significant morbidity and adversely affect patients' quality of life (QoL). The present study assessed the QoL measurement changes in patients receiving mogamulizumab versus vorinostat.A multicenter phase III trial was conducted of patients with stage IB-IV MF/SS with ≥ 1 failed systemic therapy. The QoL measures included Skindex-29 and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General. The symptoms, function, and QoL subdomains were longitudinally modeled using mixed models with prespecified covariates. Meaningful change thresholds (MCTs) were defined using distribution-based methods. The categorical changes by group over time and the time to clinically meaningful worsening were analyzed.Of the 372 randomized patients, mogamulizumab demonstrated improvement in Skindex-29 symptoms (cycles 3, 5, and 7; P .05) and functional (cycles 3 and 5; P .05) scales. A significantly greater proportion of mogamulizumab-treated patients improved by MCTs or more from baseline in the Skindex-29 symptoms domain (cycles 3, 5, 7, and 11) and functioning domain (cycle 5). Significant differences in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General physical well-being (cycles 1, 3, and 5; P .05) were observed in favor of mogamulizumab and a greater proportion of patients had declined by MCTs or more at cycles 1, 3, 5, and 7 with vorinostat treatment. The median time to symptom worsening using Skindex-29 was 27.4 months for mogamulizumab versus 6.6 months for vorinostat. In the patients with SS, the time to worsening favored mogamulizumab (P .005) for all Skindex-29 domains. The time to worsening was similar for the 2 MF treatment arms.The symptoms, function, and overall QoL of patients with MF/SS favored mogamulizumab over vorinostat across all time points. Patients with the greatest symptom burden and functional impairment derived the most QoL benefit from mogamulizumab.

NA

Mycosis fungoides with large cell transformation (MFLCT) can be difficult to distinguish from primary cutaneous CD30+ T cell lymphoproliferative disorders (PC CD30+ LPD), especially primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PC-ALCL). This diagnostic distinction is critical for appropriate patient management. GATA3 has been proposed to be useful in the discrimination between these two entities. We identified 25 cases of MFLCT and 24 cases of PC CD30+ LPDs (including lymphomatoid papulosis (n=14), PC-ALCL (n=6), and CD30+ LPD, not otherwise specified (n=4)) diagnosed at our institution from 2002 to 2019. Sections from archived specimens were stained to evaluate for GATA3 expression by immunohistochemistry and compared among cutaneous CD30+ T cell LPDs. The majority of the MFLCT cohort had strong, diffuse expression of GATA3 ranging from 0 to 100% of dermal T cells (mean 53.20%) with 15/25 cases (60%) showing GATA3 expression greater than 50%, while the PC CD30+ LPD group showed variable, moderate GATA3 labeling ranging from 0 to 60% of dermal T cells (mean 23.26%), with 5/6 cases (83%) showing GATA3 expression less than 40% (p =0.003). The calculated sensitivity and specificity were 56% and 74%, while positive and negative predictive values were 70% and 61%, respectively. Based on the percent staining of positive cells, using 50% as a cutoff value for expression, GATA3 might be a useful immunohistochemical marker to discriminate MFLCT from PC CD30+ LPDs, including PC-ALCL.

Tenalisib (RP6530), a dual phosphoinositide 3-kinase &delta, /&gamma, inhibitor was evaluated in a phase I/Ib study for maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral and cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (TCL). Histologically confirmed (TCL) patients, with &ge, 1 prior therapy received Tenalisib orally in a 28-day cycle in doses of 200 to 800 mg twice daily (800 mg in fasting and fed state) in escalation phase (n = 19) and 800 mg twice daily (fasting) in expansion phase (n = 39). The most frequently reported treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) and related TEAE were fatigue (45%) and transaminase elevations (33%), respectively. Most frequently reported related Grade &ge, 3 TEAE was transaminase elevation (21%). Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred in the 800 mg fed cohort, hence, 800 mg fasting dose was deemed MTD. Tenalisib was absorbed rapidly with a median half-life of 2.28 h. Overall response rate in 35 evaluable patients was 45.7% (3 complete response (CR), 13 partial response (PR)) and median duration of response was 4.9 months. Responding tumors showed a marked downregulation of CD30, IL-31 and IL-32&alpha, With an acceptable safety and promising clinical activity, Tenalisib can be a potential therapeutic option for relapsed/refractory TCL. Currently, a phase I/II combination study with romidepsin is ongoing.

Blood involvement by mycosis fungoides (MF)/Sézary syndrome (SS) influences prognosis and therapeutic decisions. MF/SS blood stage is currently determined by absolute CD4 + CD26- or CD4 + CD7-cell counts, which quantification method may overestimate MF/SS by including CD26- or CD7- normal CD4+ T-cells, or underestimate disease burden when MF/SS cells show incomplete loss of CD26 and/or CD7. Recently, through the standardization effort led by the International Clinical Cytometry Society (ICCS), recommendation was made to quantify MF/SS by enumerating immunophenotypically aberrant CD4+ T-cells, rather than CD26- or CD7- in isolation.We compared these two quantitation methods in 309 MF/SS patients who had blood samples analyzed by flow cytometry immunophenotyping (FCI) over a 1-year period.Using the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) criteria, 221 (71.5%) patients had a blood stage corresponding to B0, 57 (18.4%) to B1, and 31 (10%) to B2. By FCI analysis, a total of 62 patients (20.0%) were found positive for MF/SS. Among EORTC B0 patients, 11/221 (5%) were positive by FCI (false negatives), and among EORTC Stage B1 patients, 35/57 (61%) were negative by FCI (false positives). Regarding patients positive for MF/SS cells by FCI, there was an overall excellent correlation (r = .999, p .001) between the EORTC/ISCL method and FCI method; however, four (6.5%) patients would have an altered B stage between B0 and B1.The MF/SS cell quantification method using immunophenotypic aberrancies, as recommended by the ICCS, allows to distinguish MF/SS cells from background benign T-cells and enables for more accurate staging, especially among patients currently being considered to have B0 and B1 stage diseases.

Background: Brentuximab vedotin was approved for adult patients with CD30-expressing cutaneous T-cell lymphoma treated with prior systemic therapy based on improved response rates and progression-free survival with brentuximab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks; ≤16 cycles) versus physician's choice (methotrexate/bexarotene; ≤48 weeks) in the phase III ALCANZA study. Quality of life (QoL) in ALCANZA patients was also examined. Methods: QoL measures in ALCANZA were based on the Skindex-29, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and European QoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires. Results: Mean maximum reduction from the baseline Skindex-29 symptom domain score (key secondary end-point) was greater with brentuximab vedotin than physician's choice (–27.96 versus –8.62); the difference, –18.9 (95% confidence interval –26.6, –11.2; adjusted p < 0.001), exceeded the study-defined minimally important difference (9.0–12.3). Mean changes from baseline to end-of-treatment visit total FACT-G scores were similar with brentuximab vedotin and physician's choice (0.15 versus –2.29). EQ-5D changes were also comparable between arms. Among brentuximab vedotin-treated patients with peripheral neuropathy (PN), mean maximum reduction in Skindex-29 symptom domain was –35.54 versus –11.11 in patients without PN. PN had no meaningful effect on FACT-G and EQ-5D QoL scores. Conclusions: In summary, brentuximab vedotin produced superior reductions in symptom burden compared with physician's choice, without adversely impacting QoL. QoL was unaffected by the presence of PN in brentuximab vedotin-treated patients. Clinical trial registration: NCT01578499.

Kaposi sarcoma typically presents as violaceous macules and papules in immunocompromised, specifically HIV-positive, patients. Its distinct clinical features often facilitate rapid diagnosis. In this article, we report a case of Kaposi sarcoma presenting as a concerning yet nondescript lesion in an HIV-negative woman. Although Kaposi sarcoma is frequently part of the differential diagnosis for skin lesions affecting HIV-positive patients, it is less frequently considered in HIV-negative individuals. Additionally, this case differs from the classic clinical presentation of Kaposi sarcoma by resembling a squamous cell carcinoma or superficial basal cell carcinoma. Therefore, it illustrates the importance of suspicious lesion biopsies to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

Background: Involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) by mycosis fungoides (MF) is rare; however, it portends a poor prognosis. While aggressive multimodality therapy may improve outcomes, the role of radiation therapy (RT) is not well defined. Objectives: We sought to explore the efficacy of RT in the management of CNS involvement by MF. Method: We retrospectively identified five patients with MF and CNS involvement who received cranial or craniospinal RT at a single institution. Patient characteristics, disease features, radiographic findings, treatments delivered, and outcome data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Results: All 5 patients had neurologic deficits at RT initiation, and 4 experienced at least a partial improvement. Of 4 patients evaluated by MRI after RT completion, 3 had complete resolution of CNS disease within the irradiated field. At the time of last follow-up, all patients had died of MF. The median time to death was 7.4 months (range 1.0–21 months) from their diagnosis with CNS involvement and 1.2 months (range 0.4–7.1 months) from the end of RT treatment. Conclusions: We observed high rates of radiographic response and palliation of neurological symptoms. Nonetheless, all patients succumbed to their disease shortly after treatment, confirming the poor prognosis of this condition. Our findings suggest that RT may play a valuable palliative role for these patients.

Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) is a non-Hodgkin lymphoma caused by the human T-lymphotropic virus type 1. The indolent variant manifests on the skin as pruritic papules and plaques. Current treatment regimens for cutaneous ATL include watchful waiting; skin directed therapy, such as radiation, topical steroids, or ultraviolet light; or the use of oral agents, including interferon-α or zidovudine. Multiagent chemotherapy, notably mogamulizumab, is used for aggressive variantes.1,2 Chemotherapeutic agents used in ATL can be costly and associated with significant adverse effects. Imiquimod is an immunomodulator approved for actinic keratosis, primary superficial basal cell carcinoma, and genital warts. Off-label use has been efficacious in mycosis fungoides, lentigo maligna melanoma, HIV-negative Kaposi sarcoma, and primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma.3, 4, 5 We present a patient in whom nearly complete resolution of ATL was achieved with topical imiquimod therapy.

BACKGROUND: Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type, (ENKTCL) is a rare and aggressive peripheral T-cell lymphoma associated with Epstein-Barr virus infection of neoplastic cells. The current standard-of-care for patients (pts) with localized disease is combined modality with radiation and systemic chemotherapy, while advanced disease is treated with asparaginase-based combination chemotherapy or chemoradiation. To date, there is limited real-world data regarding the clinico-pathological markers, survival patterns, and long-term outcomes ENKTCL in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of pts with ENKTCL. We reviewed clinical variables, pathological characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes. Patients who were treated/referred to our instituition from 2009-2020 were included in the analysis. We excluded cases with missing treatment and/or no follow up information. Fisher's exact test or Chi-square test was used to evaluate the association between two categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the time-to-event endpoints including progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 69 patients met diagnostic criteria and were included in this retrospective analysis. Forty (60%) patients were The the median PFS to frontline treatment was 12.48 months (95% CI: 7.23-38.63), for stages I/II 19.15 months, and for stages III/IV 7.23 months . The PFS rate at 2 years was 35% (95% CI: 0.24-0.51) for the entire cohort, 46% (95% CI: 0.3-0.71) for stage I/II, and 21% (95% CI: 0.09-0.47) for stage III/ IV (p=0.0264) (Figure 1A). Extranodal involvement of the skin / subcutaneous tissue was associated with worse outcomes (Figures 1B and C), with a median PFS to frontline treatment at 3.52 months versus 14.22 months (P=0.0025), and a 2-year PFS of 14% (95% CI: 0.04-0.52). The median OS (Figure 1D) for the entire cohort was 33.94 months (95%CI 14.22 - NA), with OS at 2 years (Figure 1A) of 54% (95% CI: 0.42 -0.71) for the whole cohort, 72% (95% CI: 0.56 -0.92) for stage I/II and 33% (95% CI: 0.18 - 0.6) for stage III/ IV (p=0.0055). The most common second line regimen was SMILE (n=7, 5CRs and 1PR). Novel therapies included brentuximab vedotin (n=4), pembrolizumab (n=6), and EBV-directed T cell infusion (n=5). Analysis of molecular predictive markers, clinical correlates and toxicity data is currently ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSION: ENKTCL has poor prognosis especially in advanced stages. In this large single institution cohort, we evaluated the clinical and treatment patterns of this disease over a 12-year period. Our cohort was characterized by younger age and early stage. Higher response rates and improved survival were seen in those with early stage. In advanced stage; the presence of skin/ subcutaneous involvement was identified as a high-risk feature for worse survival. Furthermore, this trend was maintained for PFS and OS for those with advanced stages and skin/ subcutaneous involvement. A better understanding of targetable pathways and a unified treatment approach is needed to improve the outcomes for patients with high-risk features. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Huen: Rhizen: Research Funding; Elorac: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Tillium: Research Funding; Innate: Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding. Ahmed: Seagen: Research Funding; Tessa Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding. Steiner: BMS: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Chihara: Astrazeneca: Honoraria. Jain: Lilly: Consultancy; kite: Consultancy. Nastoupil: Caribou Biosciences: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: DSMC, Research Funding; Denovo Pharma: Other: DSMC. Pinnix: Merck Inc: Research Funding. Neelapu: Kite, a Gilead Company, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, Allogene Therapeutics, Cell Medica/Kuur, Incyte, Precision Biosciences, Legend Biotech, Adicet Bio, Calibr, Unum Therapeutics and Bluebird Bio: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceuticals and related to cell therapy: Patents & Royalties; Kite, a Gilead Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Poseida, Cellectis, Celgene, Karus Therapeutics, Unum Therapeutics (Cogent Biosciences), Allogene, Precision BioSciences, Acerta and Adicet Bio: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, Allogene, Kuur, Incyte, Precision BioSciences, Legend, Adicet Bio, Calibr, and Unum Therapeutics: Other: personal fees. Flowers: 4D: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Adaptimmune: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Ziopharm: Research Funding; Iovance: Research Funding; Nektar: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; SeaGen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biopharma: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Epizyme, Inc.: Consultancy; Denovo: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; EMD: Research Funding; Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; Allogene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Guardant: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Hosing: Nkarta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wang: OMI: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; BGICS: Honoraria; Moffit Cancer Center: Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy; Miltenyi Biomedicine GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; Imedex: Honoraria; Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; The First Afflicted Hospital of Zhejiang University: Honoraria; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Oncternal: Consultancy, Research Funding; Scripps: Honoraria; InnoCare: Consultancy, Research Funding; DTRM Biopharma (Cayman) Limited: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Clinical Care Options: Honoraria; Mumbai Hematology Group: Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; CAHON: Honoraria; Hebei Cancer Prevention Federation: Honoraria; Chinese Medical Association: Honoraria; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; VelosBio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; BioInvent: Research Funding; CStone: Consultancy; Newbridge Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Physicians Education Resources (PER): Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Anticancer Association: Honoraria; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Vega: i3Health, Elsevier, America Registry of Pathology, Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program, and the Society of Hematology Oncology: Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics and Geron: Research Funding. Iyer: CRISPRX: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Legend: Research Funding; Innate: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Yingli: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding.

Introduction Black (B) patients with Mycosis fungoides and Sézary Syndrome (MF/SS) have inferior survival and distinct clinical presentations, including many high risk features compared to non-black (NB) patients with MF/SS in large registry studies from the United States. We sought to characterize clinical differences in presentation, treatment, and outcomes to identify drivers of disparities among B patients with MF/SS. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 417 patients with MF/SS diagnosed between 1990 and 2020 at 6 academic institutions in the United States that serve populations with large numbers of Blacks and minorities. Patients with pathologic review and a confirmed histopathologic diagnosis of MF or SS with a stage >1B as their highest TNMB stage were eligible for inclusion. The primary objective was to assess differences in clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival between B and NB patients. Clinical variables included demographics, insurance, zip code, tumor characteristics, and treatment. Descriptive analysis was performed for each variable. Comparison between B and NB patients utilized ANOVA for numerical covariates and chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical covariates. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS were generated, and subgroups were analyzed separated. Results Among 417 patients, 204 (48.9%) were Blacks, 196 (47.0%) were White, and (4.1%) were other races (8 Asian, 5 unknown, 4 Hispanic). The diagnosis was MF in 366 (87.8%), SS in 47 (11.3%), and other 4 patients. Stage at diagnosis was available for 384 patients. 37 (9.6%) were stage 1A, 165 (43%) were stage 1B, 34 (8.9%) were stage 2A, 58 (15.1%) were stage 2B, 44 (11.5%) were stage 3, and 46 (12%) were stage 4 at diagnosis. The median survival of the whole cohort (n=417) was B patients were younger (median 50.1 years in B vs. 60.5 in NB, p On univariate analysis, race was not associated with survival; the median survival was 10.5 years (95% CI 8-13.2) in B patients and 10.9 years (95% CI 7.2-14.1) in NB patients. Covariates associated with inferior survival included older age (p Conclusions We present the first multicenter analysis of racial disparities in MF/SS, with nearly 50% B patients. B patients had distinct presentations, delay in diagnosis, and higher rates of bacteremia compared to NB patients. In contrast to US-registry studies, there was no difference in survival between B and NB patients. This finding could be explained by access to academic centers and/or higher rates of insurance coverage among B patients in our cohort. Additional analyses will be updated at the time of the presentation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Allen: ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy; Secure Bio: Consultancy. Mehta: Seattle Genetics; Incyte; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics; Incyte; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Affirmed; Kite/Gilead; Roche-Genetech; Celgene/BMS; Oncotartis; Innate Pharmaceuticals; Seattle Genetics; Incyte; Takeda; Fortyseven Inc/Gilead; TG Therapeutics; Merck; Juno Pharmaceuticals/Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Huen: Rhizen: Research Funding; Elorac: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Tillium: Research Funding; Innate: Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding. Porcu: Viracta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kiowa: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; DrenBio: Consultancy.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Brentuximab vedotin (BV) and polatuzumab vedotin (PV) are antibody-drug conjugates targeting CD30 and CD79B, respectively, approved for the treatment of select T- and B-cell lymphomas. Safety data to inform the use of concurrent radiation therapy (CRT) with BV or PV is lacking. MATERIALS/METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients (pts) who received CRT with BV or PV from 5/2018 to 1/2021. We defined CRT as infusion within 3 weeks prior to or concurrent with RT. Timing of toxicity (CTCAE v5.0) was classified as pre-RT (within 1 month prior to RT), acute (start to 1 month post-RT), and subacute (2-3 months following RT), censored at subsequent systemic therapy. Statistics were performed using Mann-Whitney U and Chi-squared tests. RESULTS Of 31 pts, 20 (65%) received BV and 11 (35%) received PV. Median age at CRT was 55 (range 27-88), and 14 pts were female (45%). 26 pts (84%) had stage III-IV disease at the time of CRT. The most common diagnoses were mycosis fungoides (12 pts, 39%; 7 with large cell transformation) and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (10 pts, 32%). Pts received a median of 4 lines of prior systemic therapy (range 0-8). 22 pts received prior RT courses (median 1, range 1-6). Fourteen pts received combination regimens with BV or PV: bendamustine and rituximab (R) (5, 16%); cyclophosphamide (C) (± R) (3, 10%); R alone (5, 16%); and C with doxorubicin (1, 3%). Eleven pts (35%) were treated with electrons targeting skin, with a median dose of 12 Gy (range 4-32). Twenty pts (65%) were treated with photons to 32 sites, with a median dose of 25 Gy (range 9-44); treatment sites included the spine (14 pts, 45%), abdomen/pelvis (9 pts, 29%), and brain (3 pts, 10%). Median percent bone marrow (BM) treated was 6.6 (range 0-18.3). The rate of grade 2 or higher (G2+) hematologic toxicity (HT) was 45% (14/31) pre-CRT vs. 79% (23/29) in the acute setting (P = 0.044) and 71% (10/14) in the subacute setting (P = 0.29). There was no significant change in acute or subacute pain, fatigue, diarrhea, neuropathy, or hepatotoxicity following CRT. Acute G2+ HT was associated with pre-RT G2+ HT (P = 0.019) and more lines of prior systemic therapy (P = 0.011). Percentage of BM irradiated was not significantly associated with acute G2+ HT (P = 0.09). Age, concurrent chemotherapy with BV or PV, prior RT courses, RT dose, and RT modality were not associated with G2+ HT. Six pts (19%) were bridged to stem cell transplant at a median of 26 days (IQR 16-52). 12 patients (39%) received subsequent systemic therapy for progression at a median of 81 days (IQR 25-87). Median time to progression or last follow-up was 72 days (IQR 20-113). At last follow-up, 18 pts (58%) were deceased; median overall survival from CRT was 177 days (95% CI 92-263). CONCLUSION CRT with BV or PV was overall well tolerated. We observed HT, particularly in patients with cytopenias prior to RT. Care should be taken during RT planning to reduce this risk if possible.

Immunotherapy targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor has demonstrated tremendous promise in the treatment of advanced solid tumors. Dermatologic toxicities, however, are an emerging consequence of this therapy and have been clearly associated with immune checkpoint blockade antibodies. Distinctive clinical and histologic subtypes of dermatologic toxicity secondary to immunotherapy are emerging and include rare autoimmune bullous reactions (eg, bullous pemphigoid) and lichenoid eruptions. We report three patients who developed lichenoid dermatitis while receiving anti-PD-1 antibody therapy. The mean time to onset of lichenoid dermatologic toxicity was 42 days (range: 1-75 days) from initiation of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy. Lesions most frequently presented on the extremities and trunk as pustules, papules, and plaques. The face was not commonly involved. Of the five skin biopsies examined, all demonstrated dense band-like lymphocytic infiltrate, hyperkeratosis, hypergranulosis, saw-tooth rete ridge pattern, and dyskeratosis. Acanthosis was a feature in all of the skin biopsies, and in one, epidermal hyperplasia was prominent. In several skin biopsies, histologic features supporting a lichenoid drug eruption were present, including parakeratosis, spongiosis, periadnexal/perivascular inflammation, and eosinophils. Furthermore, the histologic features varied in skin biopsy specimens taken from the same patient at different sites, supporting a drug reaction. All patients' skin lesions improved with use of steroids: two were treated with topical steroids and one with systemic steroids. Recognition of the histopathologic patterns of dermatologic toxicities resulting from immune checkpoint blockade therapy will become increasingly important for ensuring appropriate management of dermatologic toxicities and optimal patient care.

Background MAVORIC was a phase 3, open-label, multi-center, randomized controlled trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of mogamulizumab compared with vorinostat in patients with relapsed/refractory mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) (NCT01728805). Mogamulizumab-associated rash was the second most common TEAE of any cause or grade in the mogamulizumab treatment arm and the most common TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation, resulting in a discontinuation rate of 7% (13/184). Grade 1-2 and 3 drug rashes occurred in 20% (36/184) and 4% (8/184) of mogamulizumab-treated patients, respectively. The objectives of this analysis were to describe histopathological and other characteristics of drug rash in patients who received mogamulizumab in MAVORIC. Methods In MAVORIC, 372 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either intravenous mogamulizumab at 1.0 mg/kg once weekly for Cycle 1 (28 days) and then on days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles or oral vorinostat at 400 mg daily. Confirmed overall response rate (ORR; complete response + partial response) was based on a global composite response involving all four disease compartments and verified at two consecutive visits. Guidance to investigators was provided in the protocol for evaluation and management of new drug rash on mogamulizumab treatment. Patients with an initial Grade 1 drug rash were allowed to continue treatment with use of topical steroids as needed. For patients with Grade ≥2 drug rash, mogamulizumab was temporarily stopped, and treatment of the drug rash with topical steroids was advised. Use of systemic steroids was prohibited during the study. Treatment could resume if the drug rash resolved to Grade ≤1 within 2 weeks. Biopsies were evaluated by an on-site pathologist, and a central blinded review was also conducted. Results This analysis included 44 patients who were treated with mogamulizumab and experienced drug rash during MAVORIC. Pathologically, central review assessed rashes as granulomatous, histiocytic spongiotic, lichenoid, eosinophilic, psoriasiform, or a combination of these patterns with no clear predominant histological pattern. Among the 44 patients with drug rash, 59.1% (26/44) were ≥65 years of age, and more patients with SS [56.8 (25/44)] than MF [43.2% (19/44]) experienced drug rash. Median (Q1, Q3) exposure among patients with drug rash was 344 days (162, 652) in patients with SS and 185 days (85, 463) in patients with MF. Mogamulizumab did not result in any cases of anaphylaxis or SJS/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Concomitant or immediate prior CTCL therapies that may make patients prone to drug rash were examined, and no trend toward increased incidence of drug rash was observed with any particular agent or class. The proportion of SS responders with drug rash was significantly higher than responders without rash (P=0.02; Figure 1); the proportion of MF responders with drug rash did not differ from responders without rash (P=0.21). Overall, the median (Q1, Q3) time to onset of drug rash was 106 days (36, 254). Initial drug rash occurred after response to mogamulizumab in 70% (14/20) of patients who experienced both. Thirty-five patients (80%) in the drug rash cohort resumed treatment with mogamulizumab upon resolution of initial drug rash per-protocol. After these patients resumed treatment, the median (Q1, Q3) duration of exposure to mogamulizumab was 183 days (58, 332). Conclusions Mogamulizumab-associated rashes displayed heterogeneous histopathology without one predominant feature; therefore, close correlation of suspected drug rash with clinical features is advised to differentiate it from disease progression. A trend toward higher rate of drug rash was observed in patients with SS, the group more likely to respond to mogamulizumab. Therefore, drug rash may be attributable to increased exposure, but rash may also involve underlying disease characteristics or treatment-induced immune alterations; further investigations are warranted. Nevertheless, the observation that 80% of patients on trial were able to continue mogamulizumab for >6 months following resolution of their initial rash suggests that appropriate evaluation, identification, and management of these reactions may prevent premature discontinuation. Disclosures Musiek: Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Helsinn: Honoraria; miRagen: Other: Investigator; Elorac: Other: Investigator; Soligenix: Other: Investigator. Horwitz:ASTEX: Consultancy; Affirmed: Consultancy; Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bagot:Helsinn/Recordati: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Huen:Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Galderma: Other: Travel expense reimbursement, Research Funding; miRagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Helsinn: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Rhizen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fisher:Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: Current Employment; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Haun:Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karger, Inc.: Patents & Royalties: Textbook royalties. Vermeer:Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; PIQUR: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy. Ito:Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.: Current Employment. Dwyer:Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.: Current Employment. Herr:Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Current Employment. Kim:Elorac: Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa-Kirin Pharma: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Galderma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Solingenix: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Neumedicine: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Coccidioidomycosis is the major systemic mycoses, considered to be 1 of the most infectious fungal diseases. In symptomatic patients, the most common manifestation is pulmonary disease, but many other organs can be affected. Disseminated disease occurs in 1%-5% of all patients affected by coccidioidomycosis and can affect any organ, with the skin, central nervous system, and musculoskeletal system being reported as the most prevalent. Here, we report a 42-year-old male farmer from the west Texas who presented with an approximately 2-month history of progressive shortness of breath and dyspnea on exertion, weight loss, and night sweats. He was treated with various antibiotics for possible upper respiratory tract infection without symptomatic improvement. Computed tomography of the chest revealed numerous subcentimeter noncalcified pulmonary nodules scattered throughout both lungs with extensive mediastinal and bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy. The patient was referred to our hospital for further evaluation of suspected metastatic lung disease. Physical examination revealed an erythematous 1.2 cm nodule on his left medial eyebrow. Skin biopsy of the lesion revealed prominent squamous epithelial hyperplasia with basal keratinocytic atypia and associated mixed inflammatory infiltrate and scattered large thick-walled spherules containing variable-sized endospores, predominantly within the multinucleated giant cells. Special stain Periodic acid-Schiff tissue culture studies confirmed these to be Coccidioides immitis. After appropriate treatment with antifungal therapy for 5.5 months, his symptoms have improved with complete disappearance of lung nodules and a partially cavitated (1.1 × 1.1 cm) lesion in the left upper lung confirmed by follow-up chest computed tomography. With this report, the authors highlight disseminated coccidioidomycosis, a great mimicker of metastatic lung disease, which was diagnosed by skin biopsy, to ensure its prompt recognition and appropriate antifungal therapy.

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are a known consequence of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and may exhibit a spectrum of morphologic features both clinically and histologically. Lichenoid dermatitis associated with ICI therapy (LD-ICI) is the most frequently encountered histopathologic type of irAE biopsied by dermatologists. There is frequent clinical and histologic overlap between irAEs and several reactive and neoplastic dermatologic disorders; thus, clinical information is essential. LD-ICI with histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features typical of mycosis fungoides (MF) are unique. Here, we report a patient who developed LD-ICI with MF-like morphologic features with monoclonal T-cell receptor gene rearrangement on consecutive biopsies during ICI therapy. The development of monoclonal LD-ICI is important for clinicians and pathologists to recognize in patients receiving ICI therapy.

Sorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of renal cell and hepatocellular carcinoma. Adverse cutaneous reactions are a very common side effect of the medication. We report the development of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) in a patient after initiation of treatment with sorafenib. HS is marked by recurrent deep painful nodules, fluctuant abscesses, and draining sinus tracts most frequently occurring in the groin and axilla. To our knowledge, sorafenib-induced HS in the axillary and inguinal skin folds has not been previously reported.

Monoclonal antibodies against the immune checkpoint programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) improve the hosts' antitumor immune response and have showed tremendous promise in the treatment of advanced solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Reports of serious autoimmune dermatologic toxicities from immune checkpoint blockade therapy, however, are emerging. We report our experience with five patients who presented with pruritic vesicles and blisters on the skin while treated with anti-PD-1 antibody immunotherapy with either nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Four of the patients' skin biopsies revealed subepidermal bullae with immunohistochemical study for type IV collagen labeling the floor of the blister cavity and direct immunofluorescence studies (in three of the four patients tested) decorated linear IgG and C3 immune deposits on the blister roof, diagnostic of bullous pemphigoid. One patient developed bullous erythema multiforme. All patients had partial or complete resolution of skin lesions following treatment with systemic corticosteroid and cessation of checkpoint blockade. Recognition and treatment of rare immune-related bullous dermatologic toxicities will become increasingly important as more patients are treated with effective and newer immune checkpoint blockade therapy.

Retinoids are natural and synthetic vitamin A analogs with effects on cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. They have significant activity in hematologic malignancies and have been studied extensively in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Retinoids bind to nuclear receptors and exert their effects through moderation of gene expression. Retinoic acid receptor and retinoic X receptor exert regulatory activity in vivo, binding to distinct ligands. Studies investigating systemic retinoids as monotherapy and in combination with other agents active against cutaneous lymphoma are reviewed. Side effects associated with retinoids include teratogenicity, dyslipidemias, and hypothyroidism, which should be carefully monitored in patients receiving treatment.

Thymoma is the most common neoplasm of the thymus, and early-stage tumors carry an excellent prognosis with 5-year survival rates over 85% with primarily surgical management.1 However, thymoma has a strong association with paraneoplastic syndromes, which do not have the same favorable response to surgery. Paraneoplastic syndromes are found to persist, worsen, or even present in the post-thymectomy setting. We report a case of likely paraneoplastic vasculitis in the setting of thymoma that presented after thymectomy.

The use of agents which exhibit the ability to potently activate the innate immune response has gained significant interest as therapeutics to treat cancer. We will review the history and the current applications of these agents to treat skin cancer and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.Particular attention has been focused upon Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, including imidazoquinolines, which can trigger TLR 7 and TLR 8, and cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) oligodeoxynucleotides, which activate TLR 9-expressing cells. Imiquimod, a TLR 7 agonist, has been found to be efficacious for basal cell and squamous cell cancers, as well as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and lentigo maligna melanoma. CpGs have demonstrated efficacy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Additional more potent compounds, including resiquimod, are presently in clinical trials for several types of skin cancers.TLR agonists that can activate the innate immune response have been used to treat a variety of skin cancers including basal cell cancer, squamous cell cancer, lentigo maligna melanoma and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Significant clinical efficacy has been observed for all of these conditions. It is anticipated that additional members of the TLR agonist family will be available in the clinic for the future treatment of skin cancers as well as other malignancies.

Introduction: MAVORIC was an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of mogamulizumab (moga) compared to vorinostat (vori) in patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) who had failed at least one prior course of systemic therapy (NCT01728805). Primary results have been reported (Kim et al. Lancet Oncol 2018) and were based on a data cutoff date of December 31, 2016. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); patients in the moga treatment arm experienced significantly longer PFS compared to patients in the vori treatment arm (median 7.7 months vs 3.1 months; p Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to moga 1.0 mg/kg administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of the first cycle and on Days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles or vori 400 mg administered orally once daily. Patients randomized to vori were allowed to cross over to moga upon progression or intolerable toxicity. Safety was assessed by reported adverse events (AEs), changes in physical examinations, vital sign measurements, electrocardiograms, and laboratory analyses. Results: In total, 372 patients were randomized (moga, 186; vori, 186), of whom 370 received study drug and were included in the safety analysis (moga, 184; vori, 186). For the final safety analysis, median duration of follow-up was 34.5 months (range, 0.13-70.0) in the randomized part of the study. Median treatment exposure was 170 days (range, 1-1813) for moga and 84 days (4-1230) for vori, which represent the same median values but broader ranges compared to the primary analysis (primary analysis, 170 days [1-1379] for moga and 84 days [4-1058] for vori). The type and frequency of AEs in either the moga or vori treatment groups (Table) were consistent with those reported in the primary analysis. TEAEs, regardless of causality, that were reported at similar rates in the two treatment groups included constipation, peripheral edema, headache, and anemia. TEAEs (all causality) that occurred at higher frequency in the moga vs vori arm included infusion-related reaction (33.2% vs 0.5%) and drug eruption (25.0% vs 1.1%); the majority of these events were grade 1 or 2 (Table). The types and frequencies of AEs attributable to moga (per Investigator assessment) included infusion-related reaction (33.2% [61/184]), drug eruption (23.9% [44/184]), and fatigue (18.5% [34/184]), and for vori, diarrhea (55.4% [103/186]), nausea (38.2% [71/186]), and fatigue (33.3% [62/186]). In patients who crossed over from the vori to moga arm and received study drug (n=135), the most frequently reported AEs attributable to moga were infusion-related reaction (37.8% [51/135]), drug eruption (24.4% [33/135]), fatigue (7.4% [10/135]), increased alanine aminotransferase (7.4% [10/135]), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (7.4% [10/135]). Discontinuation rates due to AEs were similar between treatment arms and in crossover patients (moga, 21.7% [40/184]; vori, 23.7% [44/186]; crossover, 25.9% [35/135]). The most common AEs leading to discontinuation were drug eruption in the moga arm (7.1% [13/184]) and fatigue in the vori arm (4.3% [8/186]). Overall, the rates of drug-related serious TEAEs were similar between treatment arms and in crossover patients (moga, 19.6% [36/184]; vori, 16.7% [31/186]; crossover, 11.9% [16/135]). After the data cutoff for the primary analysis, 1 additional patient randomized to moga (decreased appetite, general physical health deterioration, hypoalbuminemia) and 1 crossover patient (cerebral hemorrhage) experienced TEAEs with an outcome of death, all considered unrelated to study treatment per Investigator. Conclusions: This final safety analysis from the MAVORIC study in patients with previously treated MF and SS demonstrates that moga was generally well tolerated. Longer follow-up and treatment exposure did not identify any new safety signals. The type and incidence of treatment-related AEs among patients receiving moga after crossover were similar to those observed for patients initially randomized to moga. Disclosures Kim: Merck: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Horizon: Research Funding; Corvus: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Galderma: Research Funding; Elorac: Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medivir: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Neumedicine: Research Funding; miRagen: Research Funding. Bagot:Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Zinzani:MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Duvic:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Shape: Research Funding; UT MD Anderson Cancer Center: Employment; USCLC Registry: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Secretary/treasurer of Item h; Spatz Foundation: Research Funding; Tetralogic: Research Funding; Millennium (formerly Takeda): Research Funding; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals (formeraly Therakos, Inc): Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cutaneous Lymphoma Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PleXus Communications: Speakers Bureau; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Evidera, Inc.: Consultancy; Cell Medica Inc.: Consultancy; Allos: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharma: Research Funding; Oncoceuticals: Research Funding; Soligenetics: Research Funding; Cell Medica Ltd.: Honoraria; Therakos: Speakers Bureau; Jonathan Wood & Assoc.: Speakers Bureau; Hawaiian Dermatology Society: Speakers Bureau; Hemedicus: Speakers Bureau; Janssen Pharmaceuticals (div of Johnson & Johnson): Speakers Bureau. Morris:Guys Hospital: Employment. Kim:Medimmune: Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Galderma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Actelion: Consultancy, Research Funding. Musiek:Menlo: Other: Investigator; Helsinn: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Soligenix: Other: Investigator; Pfizer: Other: Investigator; Elorac: Other: Investigator; Kyowa: Honoraria, Other: Above honoraria: for Ad Board; miRagen: Other: Investigator. Ortiz-Romero:Actelion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PLCG1: Patents & Royalties; miRagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEDA: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; 4SC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Eradat:Kyowa: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding. Magnolo:University Hospital of Muenster, Center of Innovative Dermatology: Employment. Scarisbrick:Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Recordat: Consultancy; 4SC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Helsinn: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dalle:Kyowa: Other: Principal Investigator in clinical trials promoted by Kyowa. Fisher:Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy. Poligone:Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Regeneron: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Actelion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bioniz: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Helsinn: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; miRagen: Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding. Pro:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding. Quaglino:Actelion: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Helsinn: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Therakos: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board. Reddy:AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; KITE: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Geskin:Merck: Other: Supported/Contracted Research; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties: Royalty, Receipt of Intellectual Property Rights / Patent Holder; Actelion: Other: Supported/Contracted Research; Helsinn: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Supported/Contracted Research; Stratpharma: Other: Supported/Contracted Research; Mallinckrodt: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Supported/Contracted Research; Medscape: Speakers Bureau; Medivir: Consultancy, Honoraria. Halwani:Amgen: Other: Investigator; Takeda: Other: PI; Seattle Genetics: Other: PI; Pharmacyclics: Other: Investigator; miRagen: Other: PI; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Other: PI; Immune Design: Other: PI; Genentech, Inc.: Other: Investigator; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: PI; AbbVie: Other: PI. Khot:Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre: Employment; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy. Korman:Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Dermira: Research Funding; Glaxo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa: Research Funding; Leo: Research Funding; Menlo: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Principia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Sun: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syntimmune: Research Funding; UCB: Research Funding; Valeant: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Horwitz:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Aileron: Research Funding; Miragen: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lamar:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Kyowa: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moskowitz:Cell Medica: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wells:Takeda Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Limited: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD Australia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Akilov:Trillium Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: PI on the clinical trials, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Cowan:Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy. Dummer:Merck Sharp & Dohme: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Novartis: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Roche: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Amgen: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Takeda: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Pierre Fabre: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Sun Pharma: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Sanofi: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Catalym: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships; Second Genome: Other: Intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships. Lechowicz:Kyowa Kirin Inc: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy. Foss:Eisai: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services ; miRagen: Consultancy; Acrotech: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; Spectrum: Other: fees for non-CME/CE services . Wilcox:University of Michigan: Employment. Porcu:Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Board, Research Funding; Viracta: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Board, Research Funding; BeiGene: Other: Scientific Board, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi: Research Funding; Kyowa: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Board, Research Funding; ADCT: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy. Vermeer:Kyowa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Abhyankar:Therakos: Other: Consulting, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Pacheco:University of Colorado: Employment. William:Techspert: Consultancy; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Defined Health: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Consultancy. Fukuhara:Kyowa-Hakko Kirin: Honoraria; Bayer: Research Funding; Mundi: Honoraria; Janssen Pharma: Honoraria; Mochida: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Nippon Shinkyaku: Honoraria; Zenyaku: Honoraria; AbbVie: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Solasia Pharma: Research Funding. Munoz:Pharmacyclics /Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy; Kyowa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Fosunkite: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Portola: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Querfeld:Elorac: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy, Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Medivir: Consultancy; miRagen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Helsinn: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Soligenix: Other: Investigator; City of Hope Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute: Employment; Celgene: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Kyowa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Eisai: Other: Investigator; Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator. Uhara:Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding. Huen:Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Galderma Inc: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline Inc: Research Funding. Tobinai:Meiji Seika: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundi Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; HUYA Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; AbbVie: Research Funding; Verastem: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Yakult: Honoraria; Solasia: Honoraria. Tokura:Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.: Honoraria. Boh:Actelion: Other: Principal Investigator; Tulane University School of Medicine: Employment; Celgene: Other: Principal Investigator, Speaker, Grants; Sun: Other: Speaker; Janssen: Other: Principal Investigator, Speaker, Grants; Novartis: Other: Principal Investigator, Speaker, Grants; Soligenix: Other: Principal Investigator; Incyte: Other: Principal Investigator; Regeneron: Other: Principal Investigator, Grants; Ortho Dermatologics: Other: Speaker, Grants; Pfizer: Other: Principal Investigator; UCB: Other: Speaker, Grants; Elorac: Other: Principal Investigator; Abbvie: Other: Principal Investigator. Nicolay:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries: Honoraria, Other: Conference participation fees; Novartis AG: Consultancy, Honoraria; Biogen GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria; Almirall Hermal AG: Consultancy, Honoraria; Actelion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Leoni:Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.: Employment. Ito:Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.: Employment. Herr:Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Employment. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy.