Search

In the mass drug administrations (MDA) that form the principal strategy of the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis, treatment coverages of at least 65%-80% will be needed if the programme is to be successful. In the Indian state of Tamil Nadu, where treatment coverages were typically <65%, a comprehensive strategy of advocacy and communication, called the "communication for behavioural impact" (COMBI) campaign, has been developed and implemented, in an attempt to improve treatment coverage. This strategy combined advocacy, aimed at state-, district- and village-level administrations, with communication activities targeted at individual communities. The main aim was to alter the behaviour of many of those included in the rounds of MDA, so that they would be more likely to accept and consume the diethylcarbamazine tablets offered to them. The COMBI campaign had two variants, COMBI(+) and the more intensive COMBI(+ +), each of which has been implemented in six districts. Both the variants included the "personal selling" of treatment, via door-to-door visiting by a total of 113,500 filaria-prevention assistants. These assistants were able to visit 34%-49% of the households in each target community. In the COMBI(+ +) districts, up to 44% and 38% of households received information on lymphatic filariasis and its elimination via television commercials and posters, respectively. Overall, 78% of the villages in the COMBI(+ +) districts and 33% of those in the COMBI(+) districts were considered to have had good exposure to the communication campaign. At the end of this campaign about 30% more people (than pre-campaign) believed that lymphatic filariasis could be eliminated and many of those targeted considered lymphatic filariasis to be a dreadful disease, knew that a particular day had been designated "Filaria Day", and thought that the tablets offered in MDA should be consumed to prevent or eliminate the disease. Apparently as the result of the COMBI campaign, drug consumption increased, from 33% of those living in endemic communities, to 37% in the COMBI(+) districts and to 49% in the COMBI(+ +). Coverages as high as 65%-73% were recorded among those who had had the maximum exposure to the communication campaign. These results indicate that the COMBI campaign favourably changed the perception and behaviour of the people towards the elimination of lymphatic filariasis. The costs of the COMBI(+) and COMBI(+ +) strategies were only U.S.$0.002 and U.S.$0.009 per capita, respectively.

Antigen-specific hyporesponsiveness to filarial antigens is a phenomenon observed in patent infection with lymph-dwelling filarial parasites of humans. This phenomenon has been attributed to a multitude of factors, one of which is altered monocyte function. To examine the role played by monocytes in filarial infection, we assessed the responses of monocytes obtained from normal and filarial parasite-infected individuals to both crude filarial antigen and purified recombinant filarial antigen WbSXP-1 and attempted to relate these to the altered lymphoproliferative responses seen in filarial infection. Monocytes from microfilaremic (MF) patients demonstrated an inability to respond to lipopolysaccharide compared to monocytes from endemic normal persons or from lymphedema patients. Indeed, interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta) production was severely limited, a finding that did not extend to monocyte responses to filarial antigens. Serum from MF patients reduced adherence and spreading of normal monocytes, a finding not seen with serum from the other clinical groups. Interestingly, there was a significant correlation between the production of IL-1beta and adherence. Moreover, the levels of spontaneous production of IL-1beta correlated with high levels of spontaneous secretion of IL-10. The effects observed were not a result of diminished viability or alteration in the expression of the cell surface markers CD14 and HLA-DR. These data suggest that monocyte function is dampened in MF patients, a finding which could alter lymphoproliferative responses during patent infection.

We evaluated the long-term impact of single-dose diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole combination therapy with that of diethylcarbamazine alone on the control of soil-transmitted helminths (STH) in 2 blocks (revenue units) of Villupuram district, south India, as part of an ongoing mass drug administration (MDA) campaign for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis in 2001. The prevalence and intensities of STHs were studied in 287 children, aged 9 and 10 years (136 in the combination therapy cohort and 151 in the diethylcarbamazine alone cohort), using the Kato-Katz technique to examine stool samples at 4 time-points (baseline, and 3 weeks, 6 months and 11 months after MDA). The combination therapy showed long-term efficacy against STHs and the magnitude of control remained at a moderate and significant level for 11 months after MDA compared with the moderate gains of diethylcarbamazine alone. Single-dose MDA with albendazole and diethylcarbamazine combination therapy may prove to be a good strategy in treating multiple parasitic infections in endemic communities.

The current Indian campaign for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis is largely based on mass drug administration (MDA). As part of this campaign, villagers in the Tirukoilur and Mugaiyur 'blocks' (i.e. revenue units) of Villupuram district, in Tamil Nadu, India, were treated with diethylcarbamazine (DEC), either alone (Mugaiyur) or with albendazole (Tirukoilur), in March 2001. The efficacy of treatment, in each of the two treatment arms, was evaluated by determining the percentages of the subjects who were carrying antigen from adult Wuchereria bancrofti before, 6 months and 12 months after the MDA. In a cross-sectional survey at each time-point, commercial, immunochromatographic tests were used to check 1000-1200, randomly selected, young residents (aged 2-25 years) of 18 index villages for the antigen; at least 300 villagers aged 2-9 years and at least 170 aged 10-25 years from each treatment arm were screened in each survey. Before the MDA, 12.7% of the subjects aged 2-9 years and 23.6% of those aged 10-25 years were found to be positive for the filarial antigen. Although only about 50% of villagers aged 2-9 years were successfully treated, MDA (with DEC alone or DEC plus albendazole) led to a significant (28.7%) reduction in the prevalence of antigenaemia in this age-group 6 months later (P<0.05). Although, the prevalences of antigenaemia among those aged 2-9 years were higher 12 months post-treatment than 6 months post-treatment, they were still lower (by 16%-23%) than those observed pre-treatment. The addition of albendazole to the DEC treatment appeared to offer no additional benefit in terms of the prevalence of antigenaemia in children aged <10 years; in fact, the use of DEC alone produced a slightly greater reduction in the prevalence of antigenaemia than the use of both DEC and albendazole. In the block given MDA based on both DEC and albendazole, the prevalences of antigenaemia among the villagers aged 10-25 years were 19.4% and 16.6% lower 6 and 12 months post-treatment, respectively, than observed pre-treatment. Curiously, in the block given DEC alone, the prevalences in this age-group were higher at both post-treatment follow-ups (by 17.4% at 6 months and 35.1% at 12 months) than observed pre-treatment. In concurrent experimental studies, high drug compliance (90%) among young children (aged 2-5 years) led to a pronounced (62.6%) reduction in the prevalence of antigenaemia after one MDA. In follow-up studies of those found antigen-positive, 40% of those aged 2-9 years but only 23% of those aged 10-25 years cleared their antigenaemias after three (annual) MDA. To maximize the benefits of MDA, greater efforts should be made to increase treatment coverage among young children.

The efficacy of single-dose combination drug therapy with diethylcarbamazine (DEC) plus albendazole (ALB), and single-drug therapy with DEC alone against geohelminths was compared as part of a mass drug administration (MDA) for elimination of filariasis. This study was conducted in two blocks of Villupuram District of Tamil Nadu State, India, covering a population of 321 000 including about 100 000 children 1-15 years of age. Prevalence and intensity of geohelminth infection were determined by the Kato-Katz technique immediately before and 3 weeks after the MDA. A pre-treatment cross-sectional survey was undertaken in 18 statistically selected villages out of 204 villages, including 646 school children. About 60% were infected with one or more geohelminths. The overall prevalence rates were 53.9%, 12.4% and 5.7% for Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworms and Trichuris trichiura, respectively. Combination therapy (DEC + ALB) produced a cure rate of 74.3% and an egg reduction rate of 97.3% for geohelminths, which were higher than the corresponding rates (30.4% and 79.0%) observed in the single drug therapy arm with DEC alone. The odds of cure with combination therapy were significantly higher for roundworm (5.3 times) and hookworms (3.5 times), then odds of cure with DEC alone. Both therapies were equally effective against trichuriasis, recording cure rates >77% and egg reduction rates >83%. In combination therapy, 53.5% of the children noticed expulsion of worms after MDA, while in single drug therapy only 20.9% did. Our study indicated that MDA of combination therapy was operationally feasible at the community level, and it may secure higher community compliance because of its perceived benefits and enhanced efficacy against geohelminths than single-drug therapy.

Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is targeted for global elimination. Repeated annual single-dose mass treatment with antifilarials has been recommended as the principal strategy to achieve LF elimination. This requires an effective and sustainable strategy to deliver the drug, diethylcarbamazine (DEC), to communities. In this study, a new drug delivery strategy - community-directed treatment (comDT) - was developed and implemented and its effectiveness compared with that of the traditional health services-organized drug delivery, in rural areas of Tamil Nadu, India. Qualitative and quantitative data showed that the communities and health services were able to distribute the drug in almost all villages. The drug distribution rate and treatment compliance rate of comDT and health services treatment were statistically compared after adjusting them for clustering. Under the comDT 68% (n=20 villages; range: 0-97%) of the population received DEC, compared with 74% (n=20 villages; range: 48-95%) with the health services treatment strategy (P > 0.05). However, only about 53% (range: 0-91%) of comDT recipients and 59% (range: 32-79%) of those who received DEC from the health services consumed the drug (P > 0.05). Although statistically not significant, the distribution and compliance rates were lower under the comDT strategy. Also, the strategy's operationalization appears to be difficult because of some social factors, and the tradition of communities' dependence on health services for treatment, whereas health services-organized distribution was much less cumbersome and found to be more acceptable to people. However, the distribution (74%) and compliance rates (59%) achieved by health services were also only moderate and may not be adequate to eliminate LF in a reasonable time frame. Health services manpower alone may not be sufficient to distribute the drug. We conclude that drug distribution by health services is the best option for India and participation of the community volunteers and village level government staffs in the programme is necessary to effectively distribute the drug and attain the desirable levels of treatment compliance to eliminate LF.

The global initiatives to eliminate lymphatic filariasis as a public health problem by the year 2020 have generated a great deal of debate in India, the largest endemic country. This has led to a shift in the focus from control to elimination of the disease. Although the campaign to eliminate filariasis has begun, much more needs to be done. Several recent research studies have provided an insight into various operational issues and prospects of elimination of lymphatic filariasis. In this article, the current scenario, recent research results, logistics and the prospects of eliminating lymphatic filariasis in India will be discussed.

This paper reports on DEC distribution and compliance with treatment in a large-scale annual single-dose mass treatment programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis in the south Indian state of Tamil Nadu. 76.9% of households (82.5% in rural areas and 58.0% in urban areas) were aware of drug distribution for control of filariasis. DEC was given to 70% (= distribution rate) (range 0-92%) of the population and 53.5% (range 12-89%) complied with treatment. The distribution rate was more than 75% in 74% of the villages and compliance was in the range of 51-75% in 76% of the villages. About 5% of the treated population reported side-effects. Distribution and compliance were higher in rural than urban areas and similar between males and females. Qualitative data showed that some socio-economic factors, logistic and drug-related problems and people's poor knowledge and perceived benefits of treatment played a role in a proportion of the population not receiving or taking the drug. The Tamil Nadu programme showed that large-scale repeated annual DEC mass treatment is feasible and that existing health services are capable of delivering the drug to all communities. While even poor to moderate compliance rates can reduce the vector transmission of infection to some extent, improved drug distribution and compliance with treatment are necessary to consolidate the gains of earlier rounds of treatment and achieve the goal of filariasis elimination within a reasonable time frame.