Search

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women worldwide. In Germany, in almost 70% of cases, women require a complete mastectomy and wish for breast reconstruction which is especially difficult when the breast was previously irradiated. The DIEP flap is then the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction and shows an overall low complication rate. This study aims to underline the safety of the procedure yet point out potential risk factors for flap edge and fat necrosis in a retrospective series of 1274 DIEP flaps in our center. Patients and Methods: 1274 autologous breast reconstructions with the DIEP flap were performed in 1124 patients between July 2004 and December 2014 in our department. Retrospective risk factor analysis included age, BMI, smoking, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and comorbidities. Mean follow-up constituted out of 24 months. Results: Out of 1274 free DIEP flap breast reconstructions, 150 were bilateral reconstructions. In 785 cases the primary indication was previous mastectomy, followed by prior implant-based reconstruction in 265 cases. The total flap loss rate was 0.6%. Patients with a higher BMI and smokers had significantly higher complication rates than the rest of the cohort. Elderly patients ( 65 years), patients with diabetes and ones who had undergone chemo-/ radiotherapy did not present with higher complication rates. Conclusions: The DIEP flap surgery is a well-established method for autologous breast reconstruction with a low complication rate. Yet patient characteristics in terms of risk factors need to be taken into account for result prognosis and satisfactory long-term reconstructive results., (Celsius.)

Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women in Germany. Despite breast-conserving therapy (BCT) being carried out in almost 70% of cases, a high number of women still require complete mastectomy. Prophylactic mastectomy is also indicated for women with a BRCA 1/2 gene mutation. In addition to implant-based heterologous breast reconstruction, autologous breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap has been found to be beneficial, particularly for patients who had prior radiotherapy. This study aims to show that DIEP flap reconstruction surgery is the method of choice for autologous breast reconstruction with a low rate of complications. Patients and Methods Autologous breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap was performed in 1124 patients between July 2004 and December 2014. Retrospective study criteria included potential risk factors such as age, BMI, smoking, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and comorbidities as well as outcome parameters such as postoperative complications. Outcomes were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 24 months. Results A total of 1124 patients underwent 1274 free DIEP flap breast reconstructions, of which 150 were bilateral reconstructions. The primary indication was previous mastectomy in 785 cases, followed by prior implant-based reconstruction in 265 cases. The total flap loss rate was 0.6%. Postoperative surgical revision for abdominal wall hernia was required in 0.2% of cases. The group with a higher BMI and the group of smokers had significantly higher complication rates. Elderly patients (> 65 years), patients who had undergone chemo-/radiotherapy and patients with diabetes did not have higher complication rates. Conclusion DIEP flap surgery is an excellent option for autologous breast reconstruction, with a low rate of donor site morbidity and low complication rates. DIEP flap surgery carried out in a specialised interdisciplinary breast centre in a standardised clinical setting after prior careful patient selection to take account of risk factors such as high BMI and smoking is a reliable method with a low complication rate and satisfactory long-term reconstruction results., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest/Interessenkonflikt The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest./Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Background: The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap has been shown to be a reliable option for autologous breast reconstruction. A further refinement in the transfer of lower abdominal tissue is the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap that does not require any incision of the rectus abdominis fascia or muscle and is superior regarding donor-site morbidity., Objectives: We conducted a retrospective study to assess reliability and outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction using SIEA flaps., Methods: We performed autologous breast reconstruction in 1708 patients at our department between 2009 and 2018. Of those, 28 patients that underwent breast reconstruction using a SIEA flap were included for a retrospective chart review., Results: Given an overall flap loss rate of 1.8%, we observed total flap necrosis following a SIEA flap in four patients (13%). All cases were secondary to arterial thrombosis. We further recognized a significant correlation between flap failure and a history of spontaneous deep vein thrombosis (p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant relationship between flap failure and obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m 2; p = 0.9) or flap failure and a history of abdominal operations (p = 0.6)., Conclusions: The SIEA flap provides a reasonable option for autologous breast reconstruction with the great advantage of minimal donor-site morbidity. Nevertheless, its use should be preserved to selected cases with favorable anatomy. We therefore recommend proper patient selection based on preoperative computed tomography angiography, intraoperative clinical evaluation and history of hypercoagulable state., Level of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Background: Complications are common after ostomy surgery. Data from the Berlin OStomy Study were evaluated to determine risk factors for complications., Patients and Methods: Patients with a bowel ostomy were questioned using a questionnaire concerning patients' characteristics and history as well as the ostomy and its complications. The questionnaire also contained a nine-fielded abdominal sketch to determine the exact ostomy location., Results: Over 42 months, 2647 patients completed the questionnaire. Obese patients and patients after emergency surgery were more prone to ostomy-related complications. This result was independent of the kind of ostomy (small bowel ostomy or colostomy) and of the abdominal location. The overall ostomy complication rate was 55.6%., Conclusion: Significantly more complications were recorded after emergency surgery and in obese patients than after elective surgery and in non-obese patients, respectively. There was no preferential abdominal location for avoiding general ostomy complications. The results emphasized the importance of preoperative ostomy site marking by qualified personnel such as ostomy nurses or surgeons to reduce complication rates by respecting individual abdominal configurations. With an increasing prevalence of obesity, ostomy surgery will become even more challenging in the future. A division of the abdominal wall into nine regions might be helpful and more precise for describing and examining ostomy-related complications in the future.

Background: Although ostomies are sometimes necessary, it is unclear which type of ostomy is advantageous for quality of life (QoL). In an observational study of 2647 patients, QoL after colostomy (CS) and small bowel stoma (SBS) formation was evaluated., Methods: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-QLQ-C30 and CR-38 questionnaires were used. Patient characteristics, retrospective information about the ostomy and previous treatments, and current stoma-related complications were recorded. All questionnaires were distributed and collected by stoma therapists at the homecare company PubliCare®., Results: In all, 1790 patients had a CS, and 756 had an SBS. The mean Global Health Score (mGHS-a general QoL indicator) was 52.33 in CS and 49.40 in SBS patients (p = 0.004), but the effect size (Cohen's d) was 0.1. In SBS patients, all functional scores were lower and most of the symptom scores were higher., Conclusions: QoL differed significantly for CS and SBS patients, but the effect size was marginal. The care of certain patient groups, particularly (female) patients who receive emergency surgeries, must be improved. More professional education and guidance are necessary for a larger proportion of patients. This survey provided reference data for quality of life in patients with an ostomy.