Search

Audrey L Shaw,1 David W Mathews,1 John E Hinkle,2 Bryon W Petschow,1 Eric M Weaver,3 Christopher J Detzel,1 Gerald L Klein,4 Timothy P Bradshaw1 1Clinical Development, Entera Health, Inc., 2Life Sciences Consulting and Analytics, EarlyPhase Sciences, Inc., Cary, 3Executive Management, Prairie Pharms, LLC, Nora Springs, 4Executive Management, MedSurgPI, LLC, Raleigh, NC, USA Purpose: Previous studies have shown that oral administration of bovine immunoglobulin protein preparations is safe and provides nutritional and intestinal health benefits. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the plasma amino acid response following a single dose of serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin/protein isolate (SBI) and whether bovine immunoglobulin G (IgG) is present in stool or in blood following multiple doses of SBI in healthy volunteers.Methods: A total of 42 healthy adults were administered a single dose of placebo or SBI at one of three doses (5 g, 10 g, or 20 g) in blinded fashion and then continued on SBI (2.5 g, 5 g, or 10 g) twice daily (BID) for an additional 2weeks. Serial blood samples were collected for amino acid analysis following a single dose of placebo or SBI. Stool and blood samples were collected to assess bovine IgG levels.Results: The area under the curve from time 0minute to 180 minutes for essential and total amino acids as well as tryptophan increased following ingestion of 5g, 10g, or 20g of SBI, with a significant difference between placebo and all doses of SBI (p

© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Objectives: To evaluate serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin/protein isolate (SBI) for safety and impact on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in HIV patients with chronic idiopathic diarrhea. Methods: A multi-center trial comprised of a double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled lead-in phase, (participants received PBO or SBI at 2.5 or 5.0 g BID for 4 weeks) followed by a 20-week, PBO-free phase (SBI at either 2.5 or 5.0 g BID). Participants included HIV-infected patients who were virologically suppressed with a history of chronic idiopathic diarrhea, defined as > 3 loose stools per day for ≥ 3 months without an identifiable cause. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and clinical laboratory testing. Health status and changes in GI symptoms were assessed using validated questionnaires. Results: SBI was well tolerated by the 103 participants with only 2 withdrawals due to AEs potentially associated with SBI. Mean number of daily unformed stools decreased from about 4 at baseline to less than 2 by week 4 for all study groups. Improvements in several other GI symptoms were also reported. Comparison of the PBO group to SBI groups showed no significant differences, although both SBI cohorts reported significantly improved health status scores. GI symptom improvements were maintained throughout the 20-week PBO-free phase. Conclusions: Oral SBI is safe and well tolerated at the doses studied in HIV patients with chronic diarrhea. No conclusions could be drawn regarding impact on GI symptoms. Additional studies are ongoing to examine the biological and immunologic effects of SBI in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients.

Audrey L Shaw,1 Adam Tomanelli,2 Timothy P Bradshaw,1 Bryon W Petschow,1 Bruce P Burnett3 1Clinical Research, Entera Health, Inc., Cary, NC, 2Market Research, Praxis Research Partners, Fairfield, CT, 3Medical Affairs, Entera Health, Inc., Cary, NC, USA Background: Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) commonly experience diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloating, and urgency. These symptoms significantly compromise the patient’s quality of life (QoL) by limiting participation in normal daily activities and adversely affect work productivity and performance.Purpose: The aim of this study was to understand from the patient’s perspective how oral serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin/protein isolate (SBI) impacts bowel habits, management of condition, and basic QoL.Methods: A 1-page questionnaire was distributed randomly to >14,000 patients who were prescribed SBI (EnteraGam®) for relevant intended uses. The survey was designed to collect data related to the influence of IBS or IBD on daily life activities and the impact of SBI usage on daily stool frequency, management of their condition, and QoL. Patient-reported responses were analyzed using a paired t-test to compare mean change in daily stool output and descriptive statistics for continuous variables.Results: A total of 1,377 patients returned the surveys. Results from 595 surveys were analyzed with a focus on patients with IBS or IBD who had provided numeric responses regarding daily stool frequency. Respondents with IBS who reported having a normal stool frequency (≤4 stools per day) increased from 35% prior to using SBI to 91% while using SBI. A similar change toward normal stool frequency was reported by IBD respondents. Mean daily stool numbers decreased for respondents in the combined IBS and IBD groups (P=0.0001) from 6.5±4.3 before SBI to 2.6±1.9 following SBI use. The majority of respondents agreed strongly or very strongly that SBI helped them manage their condition (66.9%) and helped them return to the activities they enjoyed (59.1%).Conclusion: Results from this patient survey suggest that SBI use can lead to clinically relevant decreases in daily stool frequency in patients with IBS or IBD along with improvements in the overall management of their condition and aspects of QoL. Keywords: IBD, IBS, patient satisfaction, stool frequency, quality of life

Serum‐derived bovine immunoglobulin/protein isolate (SBI), an oral nutritional therapy, is efficacious in diverse diarrheal diseases. In an open‐label study in 15 patients with irritable bowel syndrome‐diarrhea (IBS‐D), we evaluated effects of SBI (5.0 g, twice a day) for 8 weeks on safety, on bowel function and abdominal pain, tryptophan metabolism (K:T ratio), intestinal permeability (13C‐mannitol and lactulose excretion), bile acid synthesis (fasting serum FGF‐19 and C4), duodenal and stool microbiome, and the expression of 90 genes related to inflammation, immune function, and tight junctions in duodenal mucosa. Statistical analysis (paired tests, baseline vs. treatment) was based on intention to treat (ITT) principles. One of 15 Caucasian patients (13F, 2M, age 40.3 ± 2.3y, BMI 34.3 ± 3.0 kg/m2) withdrew without completing studies. There were improvements in stools/day (decrease, P

Purpose: To examine clinical practice effectiveness of a medical food containing serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin (SBI) for the management of symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) patients. Methods: From 165 IBS-D patient medical charts [mean age=59.6 years (range: 19-98), female (n=109), Caucasian (n=144)], recorded daily stools/consistency, abdominal pain, and patient/ physician reported quality of life (QoL) scores were retrospectively collected on those prescribed SBI for a minimum of 8 weeks. A generalized estimating equations model was used to analyze and compare changes for scores of symptoms and QoL. Results: Where data existed in charts, 46% of patients on SBI had a combined mean score reduction in daily stools, improvement in stool consistency (Bristol Stool Scale from >5 to

The health and performance of the gastrointestinal tract is influenced by the interaction of a variety of factors, including diet, nutritional status, genetics, environment, stress, the intestinal microbiota, immune status, and gut barrier. Disruptions in one or more of these factors can lead to enteropathy or intestinal disorders that are known to occur in concert with certain disease states or conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Nutritional support in the form of a medical food along with current therapies could help manage the adverse effects of enteropathy, which include effects on nutrient digestion, absorption, and metabolism, as well as utilization of nutrients from foodstuffs. Numerous studies have demonstrated that oral administration of plasma- or serum-derived protein concentrates containing high levels of immunoglobulins can improve weight management, normalize gut barrier function, and reduce the severity of enteropathy in animals. Recent trials in humans provide preliminary evidence that a serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin/protein isolate is safe and improves symptoms, nutritional status, and various biomarkers associated with enteropathy in patients with HIV infection or diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. This review summarizes data from preclinical and clinical studies with immunoglobulin-containing plasma/serum protein concentrates, with a focus on the postulated mode of action of serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin/protein isolate for patients with enteropathy.

Background: Systemic inflammation persists in chronic HIV infection and is associated with increased rates of non-AIDS events such as cardiovascular and liver disease. Increased gut permeability and systemic exposure to microbial products are key drivers of this inflammation. Serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin/protein isolate (SBI) supports gut healing in other conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind study, participants receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART) with chronic diarrhea received placebo or SBI at 2.5 g BID or 5 g BID for 4 weeks, followed by a 20-week placebo-free extension phase with SBI at either 2.5 or 5 g BID. Intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP), zonulin, flagellin, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS-binding protein, and inflammatory markers were measured by ELISA or multiplex assays. Non-parametric tests were used for analysis. Results: One hundred three participants completed the study. By week 24 SBI significantly decreased circulating levels of I-FABP (-0.35 ng/mL, P = 0.002) and zonulin (-4.90 ng/mL, P = 0.003), suggesting improvement in gut damage, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (-0.40 pg/mL, P = 0.002), reflecting improvement in systemic inflammation. In participants with the lowest quartile of CD4+ T-cell counts at baseline (189-418 cells/mL), CD4+ T-cell counts increased significantly (26 cells/mL; P = 0.002). Conclusions: Oral SBI may decrease inflammation and warrants further exploration as a potential strategy to improve gut integrity and decrease systemic inflammation among persons receiving prolonged suppressive ART. Keywords: HIV infection; CD4 T cell; Serum bovine immunoglobulin protein; Interleukin; Inflammation; Intestine; I-FABP

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 990–999 Summary Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic relapsing and remitting idiopathic inflammatory bowel disorder. Aim To evaluate once-daily mesalamine (mesalazine) granules (MG) for maintenance of remission of UC. Methods Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients (n = 209 MG, n = 96 placebo) with UC in remission [revised Sutherland Disease Activity Index (SDAI) rectal bleeding = 0, mucosal appearance

Background Hepatic encephalopathy is a chronically debilitating complication of hepatic cirrhosis. The efficacy of rifaximin, a minimally absorbed antibiotic, is well documented in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy, but its efficacy for prevention of the disease has not been established. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 299 patients who were in remission from recurrent hepatic encephalopathy resulting from chronic liver disease to receive either rifaximin, at a dose of 550 mg twice daily (140 patients), or placebo (159 patients) for 6 months. The primary efficacy end point was the time to the first breakthrough episode of hepatic encephalopathy. The key secondary end point was the time to the first hospitalization involving hepatic encephalopathy. Results Rifaximin significantly reduced the risk of an episode of hepatic encephalopathy, as compared with placebo, over a 6-month period (hazard ratio with rifaximin, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 0.64; P

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected South African patients (n=468) received blinded lamivudine or emtricitabine, stavudine, and either nevirapine or efavirenz (based on screening viral load). Baseline characteristics were analyzed in univariate and multivariate regression, to identify risk factors for hepatotoxicity (grade 3 or greater increase in serum aminotransferase levels). The occurrence of early hepatotoxicity was 17% in the nevirapine group and 0% in the efavirenz group and was balanced between the lamivudine and emtricitabine arms. Two subjects died of hepatic failure. Independent risk factors were body-mass index (BMI)18.5, female sex, serum albumin level35 g/L, mean corpuscular volume85 fL, plasma HIV-1 RNA load20,000 copies/mL, aspartate aminotransferase level75 IU/L, and lactate dehydrogenase level164 IU/L. The use of nevirapine in female patients with a low BMI should be discouraged.

Cytokine-mediated dysfunction of the intestinal mucosal barrier is observed during the active phase of IBD. SBI may reduce its impact by reducing excessive pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, such as TNFα, INFγ, and interleukins (eg, IL-1, IL-6). For example, mdr1a knockout mice prone to intestinal mucosal barrier alterations (a genetic model for IBD) who received SBI had lower levels of IL-6 and IL-17 in the mucosa during the onset of colitis. Research demonstrates that SBI survives initial digestive processes, improving gastrointestinal (GI) function and morphology in a clinically significant way. Animal studies confirm SBI improves cellularity of the lamina propria of the small intestine, resulting in improved mucosal barrier function, reduced inflammation and diarrhea, and improved dietary protein utilization through increased absorption, reduced permeability and mitotic activity, increased villus heights, with improved weight gain and bone density. SBI decreased watery bowel movements and increased...

BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that gut flora may play an important role in the pathophysiology of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We evaluated rifaximin, a minimally absorbed antibiotic, as treatment for IBS. METHODS In two identically designed, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (TARGET 1 and TARGET 2), patients who had IBS without constipation were randomly assigned to either rifaximin at a dose of 550 mg or placebo, three times daily for 2 weeks, and were followed for an additional 10 weeks. The primary end point, the proportion of patients who had adequate relief of global IBS symptoms, and the key secondary end point, the proportion of patients who had adequate relief of IBS-related bloating, were assessed weekly. Adequate relief was defined as self-reported relief of symptoms for at least 2 of the first 4 weeks after treatment. Other secondary end points included the percentage of patients who had a response to treatment as assessed by daily self-ratings of global IBS symptoms and individual symptoms of bloating, abdominal pain, and stool consistency during the 4 weeks after treatment and during the entire 3 months of the study. RESULTS Significantly more patients in the rifaximin group than in the placebo group had adequate relief of global IBS symptoms during the first 4 weeks after treatment (40.8% vs. 31.2%, P=0.01, in TARGET 1; 40.6% vs. 32.2%, P=0.03, in TARGET 2; 40.7% vs. 31.7%, P

Background Because bacterial pathogens are the primary cause of travelers' diarrhea (TD), antibiotic prophylaxis is effective in TD prevention. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the nonsystemic antibiotic rifaximin in preventing TD in US travelers to Mexico. Methods Healthy adult students traveling to Mexico received rifaximin 600 mg/d or placebo for 14 days and were followed for 7 days post‐treatment. Stool pattern and gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded in daily diary entries. The primary end point was prevention of TD during 14 days of treatment measured by time to first unformed stool. Results A total of 210 individuals received rifaximin ( n = 106) or placebo ( n = 104) and were included in the safety population. Median age was 21 years (range, 18–75 y), and the majority of participants were female (65%). Efficacy analyses were conducted in a modified intent‐to‐treat population of 201 patients who received rifaximin ( n = 99) or placebo ( n = 102). Rifaximin prophylaxis reduced risk of developing TD versus placebo ( p < 0.0001). A smaller percentage of individuals who received rifaximin versus placebo developed all‐cause TD (20% vs 48%, respectively; p < 0.0001) or TD requiring antibiotic therapy (14% vs 32%, respectively; p = 0.003). More individuals in the rifaximin group (76%) completed treatment without developing TD versus those in the placebo group (51%; p = 0.0004). Rifaximin provided a 58% protection rate against TD and was associated with fewer adverse events than placebo. Conclusions Prophylactic treatment with rifaximin 600 mg/d for 14 days safely and effectively reduced the risk of developing TD in US travelers to Mexico. Rifaximin chemoprevention should be considered for TD in appropriate individuals traveling to high‐risk regions.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new twice-daily balsalazide disodium 1.1 g tablet dosing regimen (6.6 g/day, three tablets twice daily) for the treatment of mild-to-moderately-active ulcerative colitis (UC).In a double-blind, multicenter study patients with symptoms of acute UC and a baseline Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index (MMDAI) score between 6 and 10, inclusive, with a subscale rating ofor =2 for both rectal bleeding and mucosal appearance were randomized to receive 3.3 g of balsalazide or placebo tablets twice daily for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving clinical improvement (or =3 point improvement in MMDAI) and improvement in rectal bleeding (or =1 point improvement) at 8 weeks. Safety assessments were conducted from baseline through 2-weeks post-treatment.A total of 249 patients (166 balsalazide, 83 placebo) received at least 1 dose of study medication. The mean MMDAI score at baseline was 7.9; 62% of patients had a scoreor =8.0 (moderate disease). A significantly larger proportion of patients achieved clinical improvement and improvement in rectal bleeding in the balsalazide group vs. the placebo group (55 vs. 40%, P=0.02). The most common adverse events reported were worsening of UC and headache; both were reported more often in the placebo group.Balsalazide disodium 1.1 g tablets administered as 3.3 g twice daily are effective, well tolerated and significantly better than placebo for improving signs and symptoms of mild-to-moderately-active UC. This new formulation with a reduced pill and dosing burden offers the potential to improve convenience and compliance in patients with active UC.

Background Illicit injection drug use and its attendant harms are a key health and social concern. Resilience-based strategies have the potential to complement existing approaches, but there is a paucity of research on resilience. This study identifies and explores manifestations of resilience among illicit drug users (IDUs), including indicators of cognitive transformation at key turning points, and protective factors associated with enhanced resilience. Method A secondary analysis was conducted on data collected from a larger qualitative study involving 41 injection drug users and 45 service providers and community leaders. A conceptualization of resilience as a relative and dynamic process manifesting at key ‘turning points' provided a lens to frame the analysis, which was also informed by the resilience models of Garmezy [Garmezy, N. (1991). Resiliency and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty. American Behavioral Scientist , 34 , 6–430.] and Werner and Smith [Werner, E., & Smith, R. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth . New York: McGraw-Hill.]; instances of cognitive transformation [Tebes, J. K., Irish, J. T., Vasquez, M. J. P., & Perkins, D. V. (2004). Cognitive transformation as a marker of resilience. Substance Use & Misuse , 39 , 769–788.] were also identified. Analytic techniques of constant comparison and open coding [Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A. (1995). Qualitative research methods health professionals (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.] were used. Results Key turning points reflecting resilience were captured by two themes. First, participants described how "Getting to the Point of Change" involved particular cognitive and emotional mechanisms encompassed within this theme: "Recognizing it's not Worth it", "Getting Scared" and "Recognizing an Inner Desire to Quit". The second manifestation of resilience centred on the enactment of hope in goal-setting, and entailed "Envisioning a Better Future." In contrast, descriptions of the need to dull past and present hopelessness and pain suggested the suppression of resilience. Hope and a sense of control were particular manifestations of resilience. Other factors (physical or emotional pain, frightening experiences, witnessing or experiencing negative costs) were protective for some individuals but suppressed resilience in others. Conclusion The findings support the usefulness of the concept of resilience in understanding cognitive and behavioural change among IDUs, and provide a promising direction for future research.

Associations have been reported between an MDR1 variant and responses to nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. We explored associations between MDR1, CYP2B6, and CYP3A polymorphisms and nevirapine hepatotoxicity. Among participants in a randomized study in South Africa (FTC-302), MDR1 3435C-->T was significantly associated with decreased risk of hepatotoxicity (risk ratio, 0.30; P=.016).

Emtricitabine is a new, once-daily nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) with potent activity against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).To assess the efficacy and safety of emtricitabine as compared with stavudine when used with a background regimen of didanosine and efavirenz.Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study conducted at 101 research clinics in North America, Latin America, and Europe. The first patient was enrolled on August 21, 2000; no investigator or patient was unblinded until the last patient randomized completed the week 48 visit on October 24, 2002. Analyses were based on data collected in a double-blind setting with a median follow-up of 60 weeks. Patients were 571 antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected adults aged 18 years or older with viral load levels greater than or equal to 5000 copies/mL.Receipt of either 200 mg of emtricitabine once daily (plus stavudine placebo twice daily) (n = 286) or stavudine at standard doses twice daily (plus emtricitabine placebo once daily) (n = 285) plus open-label didanosine and efavirenz, once daily.Persistent virological response, defined as achieving and maintaining viral load at or below the limit of assay quantification (or =400 or 50 copies/mL).At the interim analysis on June 14, 2002, when the last patient randomized completed 24 weeks of double-blind treatment (median follow-up time of 42 weeks), patients in the emtricitabine group had a higher probability of a persistent virological responseor =50 copies/mL vs the stavudine group (85% vs 76%, P =.005). This was associated with a higher mean CD4 cell count change from baseline for the emtricitabine group (156 cells/ microL vs 119 cells/microL, P =.01 [of note, there was no statistical difference at 48 weeks [P =.15], although a sensitivity analysis, using an intent-to-treat population with the last CD4 cell count observation carried forward to week 48 showed a difference [P =.02]]). The independent data and safety monitoring board recommended offering open-label emtricitabine based on the interim analysis. The probability of persistent virological responseor =50 copies/mL through week 60 was 76% for the emtricitabine group vs 54% for the stavudine group (P.001). The probability of virological failure through week 60 was 4% in the emtricitabine group and 12% in the stavudine group (P.001). Patients in the stavudine group had a greater probability of an adverse event that led to study drug discontinuation through week 60 than did those in the emtricitabine group (15% vs 7%, P =.005).Once-daily emtricitabine appeared to demonstrate greater virological efficacy, durability of response, and tolerability compared with twice-daily stavudine when used with once-daily didanosine and efavirenz.

The gastrointestinal tract is responsible for a multitude of digestive and immune functions which depend upon the balanced interaction of the intestinal microbiota, diet, gut barrier function, and mucosal immune response. Disruptions in one or more of these factors can lead to intestinal disorders or enteropathies which are characterized by intestinal inflammation, increased gut permeability, and reduced capacity to absorb nutrients. Enteropathy is frequently associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune enteropathy, radiation enteritis, and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), where pathologic changes in the intestinal tract lead to abdominal discomfort, bloating, abnormal bowel function (e.g., diarrhea, urgency, constipation and malabsorption). Unfortunately, effective therapies for the management of enteropathy and restoring intestinal health are still not available. An accumulating body of preclinical studies has demonstrated that oral administration of plasma- or serum-derived protein concentrates containing high levels of immunoglobulins can improve weight, normalize gut barrier function, and reduce the severity of enteropathy in animal models. Recent studies in humans, using serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin/protein isolate, demonstrate that such protein preparations are safe and improve symptoms, nutritional status, and various biomarkers associated with enteropathy. Benefits have been shown in patients with HIV infection or diarrhea-predominant IBS. This review summarizes preclinical and clinical studies with plasma/serum protein concentrates and describes the effects on host nutrition, intestinal function, and markers of intestinal inflammation. It supports the concept that immunoglobulin-containing protein preparations may offer a new strategy for restoring functional homeostasis in the intestinal tract of patients with enteropathy.

Once Daily Dosing of 9mg Budesonide (Budenofalk®) Is Therapeutic Equivalent to a Three-Times Daily Dosing of 3mg Budesonide for the Treatment of Active Crohn's Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind, DoubleDummy, Multicenter Phase III Study Axel U. Dignass, Simeon Stoynov, Andrey E. Dorofeyev, Galina A. Grigorieva, Eva Tomsova, Istvan Altorjay, Daniel Tuculanu, Ivan Bunganic, Juris Pokrotnieks, Limas Kupcinskas, Roland Greinwald, Ralph Mueller

Background There is increased interest in combining nutritional modalities with pharmacological therapies for managing patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D). Aim A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the impact of oral serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin/protein isolate (SBI) on gastrointestinal symptom scores and quality of life (QoL) in subjects with IBS-D. Methods Study subjects previously diagnosed with IBS-D according to ROME II criteria were recruited from London, Ontario, Canada and assigned to receive 5 g/day SBI, 10 g/day SBI, or placebo for 6 weeks. Daily symptom frequency and severity scores and a modified IBS-36 questionnaire assessed the impact of nutritional intervention. Laboratory assessments were performed at screening and end of treatment (EOT) to evaluate safety. Within-group comparisons of changes in number of days per week with symptoms and symptom severity were conducted on the per-protocol population of subjects using a t-test. Results Subjects who received SBI at 10 g/day (N = 15) had statistically significant within-group reductions in abdominal pain (p < 0.01), loose stools (p < 0.01), bloating (p < 0.05), flatulence (p < 0.01), urgency (p < 0.05) and any symptom (p < 0.01) at EOT vs. baseline. Subjects receiving 5 g/day of SBI (N = 15) realized statistically significant within-group reductions in days with flatulence (p < 0.035), incomplete evacuation (p < 0.05), and any symptom (p < 0.01). There were no significant changes in QoL scores or in hematology or clinical chemistry among treatment groups. Conclusions This pilot study showed that nutritional therapy with either 10 g/day or 5 g/day of SBI in 30 patients was well tolerated and resulted in statistically significant within group improvements in both symptom days and in daily symptom scores in subjects with IBS-D. Additional studies are underway with larger numbers of subjects to validate these findings.

Mesalamine granules (MG) are the first 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) formulation to use an innovative delivery system that combines delayedand extended-release mechanisms to release mesalamine directly in the ileum and colon. Agents with a low pill burden and favorable safety profile are more likely to enhance patient compliance in the long-term maintenance of UC remission. Two similarly designed multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials (RCTs) have individually demonstrated significant efficacy of MG (1.5 g, q. d.) for the long-term maintenance of ulcerative colitis (UC). Additionally, an open-label extension trial (OLT) with new and rollover subjects from the two phase 3 trials was conducted to study the long term safety of MG for maintenance of UC remission. The integrated safety data in the expanded population of subjects who received MG from all three trials are presented here (All MG population). Methods: Data for the All MG analyses (n=557) included subjects who received MG in the two RCTs (n=367) and the OLT. The OLT included 197 MGtreated patients who rolled over from the RCTs; and 190 MG naive patients (83 placebo-treated patients from the RCTs, and 107 new patients) all in UC remission. Results: Of 557 patients included in the analysis, 250 patients were exposed for >1 year and 354 were exposed to MG (1.5 g, q.d.) for >6 months. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 69.7% in the All MG group. Majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate in intensity, with a profile similar to that during the 6month RCTs. The notably lower incidence of UC flare observed in the RCTs for MG (10.9%) versus placebo (24.3%) was maintained (10.4%) in the OLT. Other common TEAEs in the All MG group were headache (13.8%), diarrhea (9.7%), nasopharyngitis (8.8%), abdominal pain (7.7%), sinusitis (5.4%), and nausea (5.2%). Incidences of serious adverse events and TEAEs leading to study discontinuation were comparable between the 6-month RCT group and the All MG population in the open label study. Occurrences of renal, hepatic, and pancreatic adverse events in patients in the open-label study were ≤1%. Long term compliance for the once-daily treatment regimen was high: mean compliance was ≥ 95% in each treatment group in the RCT population, and 88% for the All MG population. Conclusions: The favorable safety profile of MG when combined with a high compliance of once-daily dosing may support its dispensation as first-line therapy for long-term maintenance of UC remission.

Mesalamine granules (MG) are the first 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) formulation to use an innovative delivery system that combines delayedand extended-release mechanisms to release mesalamine directly in the ileum and colon. Agents with a low pill burden and favorable safety profile are more likely to enhance patient compliance in the long-term maintenance of UC remission. Two similarly designed multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials (RCTs) have individually demonstrated significant efficacy of MG (1.5 g, q. d.) for the long-term maintenance of ulcerative colitis (UC). Additionally, an open-label extension trial (OLT) with new and rollover subjects from the two phase 3 trials was conducted to study the long term safety of MG for maintenance of UC remission. The integrated safety data in the expanded population of subjects who received MG from all three trials are presented here (All MG population). Methods: Data for the All MG analyses (n=557) included subjects who received MG in the two RCTs (n=367) and the OLT. The OLT included 197 MGtreated patients who rolled over from the RCTs; and 190 MG naive patients (83 placebo-treated patients from the RCTs, and 107 new patients) all in UC remission. Results: Of 557 patients included in the analysis, 250 patients were exposed for >1 year and 354 were exposed to MG (1.5 g, q.d.) for >6 months. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 69.7% in the All MG group. Majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate in intensity, with a profile similar to that during the 6month RCTs. The notably lower incidence of UC flare observed in the RCTs for MG (10.9%) versus placebo (24.3%) was maintained (10.4%) in the OLT. Other common TEAEs in the All MG group were headache (13.8%), diarrhea (9.7%), nasopharyngitis (8.8%), abdominal pain (7.7%), sinusitis (5.4%), and nausea (5.2%). Incidences of serious adverse events and TEAEs leading to study discontinuation were comparable between the 6-month RCT group and the All MG population in the open label study. Occurrences of renal, hepatic, and pancreatic adverse events in patients in the open-label study were ≤1%. Long term compliance for the once-daily treatment regimen was high: mean compliance was ≥ 95% in each treatment group in the RCT population, and 88% for the All MG population. Conclusions: The favorable safety profile of MG when combined with a high compliance of once-daily dosing may support its dispensation as first-line therapy for long-term maintenance of UC remission.

Mesalamine granules (MG) are the first 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) formulation to use an innovative delivery system that combines delayedand extended-release mechanisms to release mesalamine directly in the ileum and colon. Agents with a low pill burden and favorable safety profile are more likely to enhance patient compliance in the long-term maintenance of UC remission. Two similarly designed multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials (RCTs) have individually demonstrated significant efficacy of MG (1.5 g, q. d.) for the long-term maintenance of ulcerative colitis (UC). Additionally, an open-label extension trial (OLT) with new and rollover subjects from the two phase 3 trials was conducted to study the long term safety of MG for maintenance of UC remission. The integrated safety data in the expanded population of subjects who received MG from all three trials are presented here (All MG population). Methods: Data for the All MG analyses (n=557) included subjects who received MG in the two RCTs (n=367) and the OLT. The OLT included 197 MGtreated patients who rolled over from the RCTs; and 190 MG naive patients (83 placebo-treated patients from the RCTs, and 107 new patients) all in UC remission. Results: Of 557 patients included in the analysis, 250 patients were exposed for >1 year and 354 were exposed to MG (1.5 g, q.d.) for >6 months. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 69.7% in the All MG group. Majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate in intensity, with a profile similar to that during the 6month RCTs. The notably lower incidence of UC flare observed in the RCTs for MG (10.9%) versus placebo (24.3%) was maintained (10.4%) in the OLT. Other common TEAEs in the All MG group were headache (13.8%), diarrhea (9.7%), nasopharyngitis (8.8%), abdominal pain (7.7%), sinusitis (5.4%), and nausea (5.2%). Incidences of serious adverse events and TEAEs leading to study discontinuation were comparable between the 6-month RCT group and the All MG population in the open label study. Occurrences of renal, hepatic, and pancreatic adverse events in patients in the open-label study were ≤1%. Long term compliance for the once-daily treatment regimen was high: mean compliance was ≥ 95% in each treatment group in the RCT population, and 88% for the All MG population. Conclusions: The favorable safety profile of MG when combined with a high compliance of once-daily dosing may support its dispensation as first-line therapy for long-term maintenance of UC remission.