Search

Purpose This article combines the results of 3 studies that were presented at the HeAL 2018 Conference in Lake Como, Italy, in June 2018. Each study involved electrocochleography (ECochG), a neurodiagnostic evaluation that has been used clinically for over 80 years but whose applications continue to expand. The 1st study describes recent research wherein ECochG was recorded from asymptomatic subjects who were siblings or offspring of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Ménière's disease (MD). Our results provide evidence that ECochG may be helpful in not only diagnosing MD but also predicting it as well. Second, case studies are described where ECochG was important in both diagnosing superior semicircular canal dehiscence and monitoring the repair of this condition during surgery. Finally, although ECochG has been practiced clinically for over 8 decades, the protocols for recording, measuring, and interpreting the electrocochleogram continue to lack standardization among clinicians and scientists. We thus present normative data for some of these features based on noninvasive recordings made from the tympanic membrane from 100 normal hearing subjects. Conclusions Although the primary use of ECochG continues to be in the diagnosis of MD, we report on 2 additional clinical applications for this important test of inner ear/auditory nerve function. First, a preliminary study on a small sample of subjects indicates that ECochG may also be useful in predicting MD prior to the onset of symptoms in individuals who may be genetically predisposed to developing it. Second, through a series of case studies, we demonstrate how ECochG is used to help diagnose superior semicircular canal dehiscence and monitor the status of the inner ear during the surgical repair of this condition. Finally, normative values for clinically important components of the electrocochleogram based on tympanic membrane recordings have been established from a large sample of subjects.

Background: Audiology clinics have many tools available to evaluate auditory and vestibular complaints. However, many tools lack established normative ranges across the life span. We conducted this study to establish reference ranges across the life span for audiology/vestibular measures commonly used to evaluate patients with traumatic brain injury., Materials and Methods: In this repeated measures study, 75 adults, ages 18-65 years, without a history of traumatic brain injury, underwent robust auditory/vestibular evaluations three times over six months, including rotational chair, videonystagmography, computerized dynamic posturography, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and retinal fundoscopy., Results: Age effect was notable for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, pure-tone audiometry, auditory brainstem response, auditory middle latency response, and auditory-steady state response at 4000 hertz (Hz). Older participants (50-65 years) were more likely to have delayed latency horizontal saccades, positional nystagmus, slowed lower-extremity motor control responses, and delayed latency ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Low to mid-frequency horizontal (0.003-4 Hz) and mid-frequency vertical (1-3 Hz) vestibulo-ocular reflex, otolith-mediated reflexes, dynamic visual acuity and balance measures were generally not influenced by age. Females had larger static subjective visual testing offset angles, longer cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential P1 latency, faster velocity horizontal saccades, and quicker motor control latency for large backward translations than age-matched males., Conclusion: These reference ranges can be used to discern impairment within the auditory and vestibular pathway following traumatic brain injury in young to middle-aged adults., Id: TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01925963., Competing Interests: The authors of this paper declare no conflicts of interest exist with this submission., (Copyright© Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society.)

Background: The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is used to estimate behavioral hearing thresholds in infants and difficult-to-test populations. Differences between the toneburst ABR and behavioral thresholds exist making the correspondence between the two measures less than perfect. Some authors have suggested that corrections be applied to ABR thresholds to account for these differences. However, because there is no agreed upon universal standard, confusion regarding the use of corrections exists., Purpose: The primary purpose of this article is to review the reasoning behind and use of corrections when the toneburst ABR is employed to estimate behavioral hearing thresholds. We also discuss other considerations that all audiologists should be aware of when obtaining and reporting ABR test results., Results: A review of the purpose and use of corrections reveals no consensus as to whether they should be applied or which should be used. Additionally, when ABR results are adjusted, there is no agreement as to whether additional corrections for hearing loss or the age of the client are necessary. This lack of consensus can be confusing for all individuals working with hearing-impaired children and their families., Conclusions: Toneburst ABR thresholds do not perfectly align with behavioral hearing thresholds. Universal protocols for the use of corrections are needed. Additionally, evidence-based procedures must be employed to obtain valid ABRs that will accurately estimate hearing thresholds., (American Academy of Audiology)

Background: In a 2-stage neonatal hearing screening protocol, if an infant fails the first-stage abstract screening with an otoacoustic emissions test, an automated auditory brainstem response (ABR)test is performed. The purpose of this study was to estimate the rate of hearing loss detected byfirst-stage otoacoustic emissions test but missed by second-stage automated ABR testing., Methods: The data of 17 078 infants who were born at Lis Maternity Hospital between January 2013 and June 2014 were reviewed. Infants who failed screening with a transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) test and infants admitted to the NICU for more than 5 days underwent screening with an automated ABR test at 45 decibel hearing level (dB HL). All infants who failed screening with TEOAE were referred to a follow-up evaluation at the hearing clinic., Results: Twenty-four percent of the infants who failed the TEOAE and passed the automated ABR hearing screening tests were eventually diagnosed with hearing loss by diagnostic ABR testing (22/90). They comprised 52% of all of the infants in the birth cohort who were diagnosed with permanent or persistent hearing loss .25 dB HL in 1 or both ears (22/42).Hearing loss .45 dB HL, which is considered to be in the range of moderate to profound severity, was diagnosed in 36% of the infants in this group (8/22), comprising 42% of the infants with hearing loss of this degree (8/19)., Conclusions: The sensitivity of the diverse response detection methods of automated ABR devices needs to be further empirically evaluated.

Objective: Assessing compliance with the section "Assessment of hearing" stipulated in the Technical Standard to Detect Alteration in children aged less than 10 years-old in Bogota., Methods: This was a cross-sectional study which involved reviewing the medical records of all children born between July 1st and December 31st 2010 in two healthcare institutions in Bogota. Records were selected in which any of the following risk factors appeared: neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia involving phototherapy, neonatal exposure to ototoxic substances and/or <1.500 gr low birth weight. It was also ascertained whether children had been referred to an auditory evoked potential test as the prescribed screening test for neonatal hearing, as stipulated in mandatory Colombian technical standards for detecting abnormal growth and developmental in children aged less than ten years-old., Results: Neither of the two institutions was making the aforementioned referral test., Discussion: The results indicated significant difficulties in adherence to the protocol for the early detection of hearing loss regarding pertinent/current neonatal Colombian regulations.

Background: Tests of auditory perception, such as those used in the assessment of central auditory processing disorders ([C]APDs), represent a domain in audiological assessment where measurement of this theoretical construct is often confounded by nonauditory abilities due to methodological shortcomings. These confounds include the effects of cognitive variables such as memory and attention and suboptimal testing paradigms, including the use of verbal reproduction as a form of response selection. We argue that these factors need to be controlled more carefully and/or modified so that their impact on tests of auditory and visual perception is only minimal., Purpose: To advocate for a stronger theoretical framework than currently exists and to suggest better methodological strategies to improve assessment of auditory processing disorders (APDs). Emphasis is placed on adaptive forced-choice psychophysical methods and the use of matched tasks in multiple sensory modalities to achieve these goals. Together, this approach has potential to improve the construct validity of the diagnosis, enhance and develop theory, and evolve into a preferred method of testing., Research Design: Examination of methods commonly used in studies of APDs. Where possible, currently used methodology is compared to contemporary psychophysical methods that emphasize computer-controlled forced-choice paradigms., Results: In many cases, the procedures used in studies of APD introduce confounding factors that could be minimized if computer-controlled forced-choice psychophysical methods were utilized., Conclusions: Ambiguities of interpretation, indeterminate diagnoses, and unwanted confounds can be avoided by minimizing memory and attentional demands on the input end and precluding the use of response-selection strategies that use complex motor processes on the output end. Advocated are the use of computer-controlled forced-choice psychophysical paradigms in combination with matched tasks in multiple sensory modalities to enhance the prospect of obtaining a valid diagnosis., (American Academy of Audiology.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the between-session repeatability of auditory steady state response (ASSR) amplitudes and to examine F ratio response detection parameters., Design: Suprathreshold ASSRs were recorded from 20 normal-hearing and 10 hearing-impaired subjects. Amplitudes and latencies were recorded in two test sessions conducted on separate days., Analysis: The repeatability coefficients (limits of expected variation in repeat measurements) for amplitude and latency of ASSRs were calculated. The test time required for the responses to reach significance at 1%, 2%, and 5% F ratios was analyzed. The percentage false response detection rate was calculated to determine the suitability of current ASSR threshold estimation protocols for use in audiology clinics., Results: The repeatability coefficients for the amplitude of ASSRs were 29 nV for the normal-hearing subjects and 57 nV for the hearing-impaired subjects. The repeatability coefficients for the latency of ASSR were 1.10 msec for the normal-hearing subjects and 1.19 msec for the hearing-impaired subjects. High false-positive detection rates were found for detection procedures that used variable test time ("stop when significance reached" methods)., Conclusions: The results of this study showed that ASSR amplitudes are highly variable between test sessions with an average estimated variability in response amplitude of ± 40% for normal-hearing participants and ± 97% for hearing-impaired participants. This could be a possible cause of test-retest differences in ASSR threshold measurements, as it could potentially lead to thresholds that were above the EEG noise level and significant in one test session subsequently falling below the EEG noise level in the repeat test session leading to insignificant response and thus poorer ASSR threshold.

Background: Standardization of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential (BAEP) using a new device., Aim: To standardize BAEP responses using a new device developed (NDD) in Brazil., Method: Analysis of absolute latencies, interpeaks and wave amplitudes of BAEP, using a new device developed to study normal-hearing groups (91 adults) and individuals (15 adults) with bilateral neurosensory hearing loss. Responses obtained in the EP15 hearing device/Interacoustics and the NDD were compared. For this, the following paramenters were used: non-filtered click of 100 microsecond (µs), totaling 2000 stimuli in rarefied polarity, stimulation frequency of 13.1 clicks/s, intensity of 80 decibels normalized hearing level (dB nHL), with a window of 10 milliseconds and bandpass filter between 100 and 3000 Hertz (Hz). Significance level was set at 0.05., Results: Absolute latency and interpeak means for 76 normal-hearing individuals with the NDD were: wave I=1.50, III=3.57, V=5.53, I-III=2.06, III-V=1.96 and I-V=4.02. When analyzing results according to gender, there was a statistically significant difference for the absolute latencies of waves III and V and in interpeaks I-III and I-V. Mean amplitude value of wave I=0.384 microvolt (µV) and of wave V=0.825 µV. There was no statistically significant difference between the absolute latencies and interpeaks of the two devices in the same individual., Conclusion: The components of BAEP with the NDD in normal-hearing subjects were similar regarding the tested ears, with statistically lower latencies in women. The BAEP latencies in the same individual with NDD were similar to those obtained with the EP15 / Interacoustics. Normal values of BAEP were obtained in normal-hearing adults.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risks of uncontrolled use of an objective detection criterion in recording auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs). The influence of decisions such as when to accept a response and stop the recording was assessed by analyzing the number of false- and true-detected responses., Design: A large sample of 500 multiple-stimulus ASSR recordings of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults and babies was processed offline. Three types of detection paradigms were evaluated. A first type had a fixed recording length with significance testing after the last sweep. A second type allowed a variable recording length and implied sequential application of the statistical decision criterion. The recording was stopped after significance was reached for y consecutive sweeps. The third type was analogous to the second, with the additional requirement of a minimum of eight recorded sweeps. Furthermore, the effect of significance level and averaging procedure were assessed. Error rates were calculated for the different detection paradigms at eight control frequencies. At the signal frequencies, detection rates and recording times were determined, keeping the error rates fixed. Moreover, ASSR thresholds were compared for a selection of detection paradigms., Results: When a variable recording length was allowed and a significance level of p = 0.05 was applied, the error rate increased to unacceptable levels because of the effect of repeated testing. The error rate decreased as the required number of consecutive significant sweeps increased and approximated 5% only when eight consecutive significant sweeps were required (with a maximum of 32 recorded sweeps). With an error rate of 5%, the highest detection rate was associated with a fixed recording length of 32 sweeps combined with weighted averaging. A substantial decrease in detection rate was noted when less than 24 sweeps were recorded per intensity. All paradigms with a variable recording length had rather comparable detection rates and recording times. With an error rate of only 1%, small responses could not be distinguished from the noise. The reduction in recording time using a variable instead of a fixed recording length was very limited when a conventional multiple-stimulus approach was used. Test duration would be reduced considerably when the test set-up would allow an independent presentation and recording of the eight signals and responses. Differences in overall detection rate had a small effect on the ASSR thresholds., Conclusions: The error rate, detection rate, and recording time can improve or deteriorate significantly, even with small adaptations of the detection protocol. When a variable recording length is allowed, the acceptance criterion of the statistical test needs to be adjusted to ensure a tolerable error rate. However, most commercial devices do not offer this option. Then, it is advisable to use a fixed recording length and to judge the significance of the responses at the end of the recording. Although response detection is objective, the measurement protocol has to be well-considered and a critical approach is required when interpreting the responses.

Reported are the results of meta-analyses of data derived collectively from a sample of 56 published research studies on electric response audiometry (ERA) using auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs). Several specific methodological issues were examined and hypotheses were posited to rigorously test common conclusions drawn from the ASSR literature on the accuracy of ASSR-ERA. Explanatory variables for analyses were type of population (normally hearing and hearing-impaired), type of modulation, number of sweeps acquired during response analysis, electrode montage, and modulation rate (80 vs. 40 Hz). No explanatory variables were found to be significantly related to the degree of disparity between thresholds obtained by ASSR-ERA versus behavioral audiometry in the normally hearing population. Conversely, all but one explanatory variable (i.e. electrode montage) was found to be significantly related to mean threshold differences in the hearing-impaired and combined populations. Results both substantiate some of common conclusions drawn from the literature but call others into question, helping to identify those methodological issues which appear to, or not to, significantly affect the accuracy of estimating threshold using ASSR measurement. In addition to these findings, another practical outcome of this study was the development of various summary tables of the data analysed from the literature sampled.

The mode of stimulation employed in newborn screening of the auditory brainstem response has evolved from the clinically standardized supraaural earphone to the tubal insert earphone, to most recently a circumaural earphone developed for this test. Considered here is the need to develop a standard for calibration of such devices for newborn screening applications, in particular. At risk is the prospect of missing the milder degrees of hearing loss, assuming a goal of detecting all clinically-significant congenital hearing losses. Two commercially manufactured test instruments for automated newborn screening were scrutinized via bench testing of sound output from their respective transducers, using a variety of measurements. By convention or design, none of the measurement approaches involved a model of the newborn ear, per se. While it was concluded that the manufacturers' method shows promise, namely as a relatively simple and potentially reliable method of calibration, concerns arose regarding output levels when measured according to both the manufacturers' and the authors' methods. Further work is needed to critically assess calibration methods and to establish, to the extent possible, appropriate norms and validation studies in newborns to provide a better understanding of the actual sound pressure level of the screening stimulus.

We aimed to investigate whether auditory brainstem response (ABR), assessed immediately after grommet insertion, was an accurate measure of hearing threshold. Ten children were recruited (20 ears). Patients underwent transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and ABR tests before and after grommet insertion under general anaesthetic. A third assessment was conducted at a six-week review, without anaesthetic or sedation. The hearing threshold in dB and the presence of TEOAE were recorded by senior audiologists. The results of each investigation were compared. At review, only 15 ABR and 17 TEOAE tests, of a possible 20, were recorded. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions were recorded in 30 per cent of ears pre-operatively, 20 per cent of ears post-operatively and 82 per cent of ears at six-week review. The average ABR thresholds were 23.75 dB (range 10-45 dB) pre-operatively, 27.25 (range 15-40 dB) post-operatively and 15 dB (range 5-25 dB) at six-week review. Comparing pre- and post-operative assessment, decreased thresholds were seen in six ears and elevated thresholds in 11. Comparing the six-week review ABR with the post-operative ABR, 13 ears had decreased thresholds, by as much as 20 dB. Thresholds of 35 dB or greater were measured in six ears immediately after grommet insertion (maximum 40 dB). Threshold shifts of 15 dB or greater was observed in seven ears. The intra-subject variation was shown to be significant (p<0.001) when repeated measures analysis of variance was applied. We conclude that there is evidence that ABR can be inaccurate after grommet insertion, overestimating hearing thresholds. We believe that the mechanism by which the error is realised is temporary threshold shift.

We aimed to investigate the incidence of false alarms that occurred with the pass/fail criteria used in a published series of neonatal hearing screening programmes, as a function of age. We analysed the database of 19137 normally hearing babies (38274 ears) tested in the Wessex Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening Project. Otoacoustic emissions were recorded prior to discharge from maternity units, using IL088 equipment. We assessed the pass/fail rate using the Wessex criteria and 10 other pass/fail criteria published in the literature. Using Pearson's correlation coefficient, a statistically significant correlation between signal-to-noise ratio at each of the frequency bands 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 kHz and babies' age in hours at the 0.01 level was identified. The correlation was also significant (0.01 level) between age and frequency reproducibility in each of the bands at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 kHz as well as the whole reproducibility. The number of false alarms reduced significantly after the first 24 h of life with all the criteria examined. We conclude that in the first hours after birth due to insufficient maturation of the otoacoustic emission, there is a high rate of false alarms. This increase in the false alarm rate, whilst dependent on the criteria used, occurs with all criteria. This leads to the consideration of whether the establishment of age-dependent pass/fail criteria could reduce the false alarm rate and the subsequent strain on diagnostic centres., (Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a 2-hr initial audiologic assessment appointment for infants referred from area universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) programs to a clinical audiology department in an urban hospital., Method: A prospective auditory brainstem response (ABR)-based protocol, including clicks, frequency-specific tone bursts, and bone-conducted stimuli, was administered by 10 audiologists to 375 infants. Depending on the ABR findings, additional test options included distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), high-frequency tympanometry, and/or otologic examination., Results: In 88% of the 2-hr test sessions, at least 4 ABR threshold estimates were obtained (i.e., bilateral clicks and either a 500- or 1000-Hz tone burst and a 4000-Hz frequency tone burst for the better ear). The incidence of hearing loss was significantly different across nursery levels: 18% for Level I (well baby), 29% for Level II (special care), and 52% for Level III (neonatal intensive care unit). Hearing loss type was defined at the initial assessment for 35 of the 51 infants with bilateral hearing loss based on bone-conduction ABR, latency measures, DPOAEs, high-frequency tympanometry, and/or otologic examination., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that a 2-hr test appointment is appropriate for all nursery levels to diagnose severity and type of hearing loss in the majority of infants referred from UNHS. Examination by an otolaryngologist within 24-48 hr further defines the hearing loss and facilitates treatment plans.

The validity and accuracy of the application of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) to electric response audiometry (ERA) was tested further in a study permitting subjects to be their own controls for hearing loss. Simulated sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) of complex configuration and varying degrees was effected using filtered masking noise. Thresholds estimated via ASSR-ERA were compared to those measured via conventional pure-tone audiometry. Further, the slow vertex potential N1-P2 was recorded to permit a comparison with an evoked-response test of common content validity and known accuracy. Results in a homogeneous subject sample demonstrated strong interest correlation and agreement within 10 dB at 1000 to 4000 Hz (on average), but not at 500 Hz. The configurations determined by ASSR-ERA followed behavioral audiometric patterns well, except for the mildest degree of SSHL tested. Consequently, limitations of ERA remain, although ASSR-ERA appears to be quite valid overall and promises (justifiably) broad clinical applicability.

The test accuracy and prognostic validity of Multiple Auditory Steady State Responses (MSSR) and click Auditory Brainstem Responses (cABR) was compared within the context of a targeted screening protocol. A sample of 508 high-risk babies was first screened using cABR and MSSR (500 and 2000 Hz). All children (failed/ pass) were called back at three to four years of age to determine their hearing status (pure-tone audiometry). Although both methods showed an equally good test performance in the first screen (sensitivity: 100% and specificity: 92-95%), the MSSR may have some potential advantage to identify low-frequency hearing loss. Furthermore, the confirmatory audiometry with MSSR predicted the child hearing status more accurately than the cABR. In conclusion, the MSSR can provide valuable information for the diagnosis and management of infants earlier detected by a screening protocol and further developed might be also useful as a screening test.

Objective: To compare the ALGO 3 Newborn Hearing Screener (Natus Medical Inc.) to the ALGO 2e Newborn Hearing Screener (Natus Medical Inc.)., Design: A prospective evaluation., Setting: Three maternity hospitals., Patients/participants: 199 newborns enrolled; 194 completed the study., Interventions: Patients were tested using either the ALGO 3 screener or the ALGO 2e screener first, and then screened with the alternate device. Initial screens resulting in REFER outcomes were repeated using the same device. An ALGO 2e PASS result was accepted as adequate evidence of hearing. Two sequential ALGO 2e REFER results required further diagnostic testing to determine hearing status., Main Outcome Measures: Average screening times and referral rates of both hearing screeners., Results: The ALGO 3 screener averaged 70.8 seconds (95% confidence interval = 34.5-107.1 seconds), or was 23% faster than the ALGO 2e screener (p = .0002). There were 48% fewer REFER results after initial screening with the ALGO 3 screener (5.7%) than with the ALGO 2e screener (10.9%) (p = .06). Faster screen times and fewer referrals were noted at each hospital., Conclusion: The ALGO 3 screener can increase caregiver efficiency by accurately screening hearing in newborns faster and with fewer REFER results than the ALGO 2e screener.

Objective: To determine the clinical usefulness of the dichotic multiple-frequency (MF) auditory steady-state response (ASSR) technique for estimating normal hearing compared to a 0.5-kHz tone burst and broadband click auditory brainstem response (ABR) protocol in a sample of adults., Material and Methods: A comparative experimental research design was selected in order to compare estimations of normal hearing obtained with the dichotic ASSR technique at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz with a 0.5-kHz tone burst and broadband click ABR protocol. The recording times required for each procedure were also compared. Normal-hearing subjects (n = 28) were selected according to immittance values within normal limits and pure-tone behavioural thresholds of < 25 dB HL across frequencies., Results: The dichotic MF ASSR estimated normal hearing to be, on average, 30-34 dB HL across the range 0.5-4 kHz. The mean estimate of normal hearing for 0.5 kHz using tone burst ABRs was 30 dB nHL and the mean click ABR threshold was 16 dB nHL, i.e. 14-18 dB better than the ASSR thresholds. The dichotic MFASSR technique recorded 8 thresholds (4 in each ear) in a mean time of 23 min. The ABR protocol recorded 4 thresholds (2 in each ear) in a mean time of 25 min., Conclusion: Both the dichotic MF ASSR and ABR protocols provided a time-efficient estimation of normal hearing. There was no significant difference between the tone burst ABR and MF ASSR techniques in terms of estimation of normal hearing at 0.5 kHz. The dichotic MF ASSR technique proved more time-efficient by determining more thresholds in a shorter time compared to the ABR protocol.

Objectives/hypothesis: Transtympanic electrocochleography (t-ECOG) is a sensitive diagnostic instrument used for Meniere's disease. It is sensitive by virtue of the recording electrode's position on the promontory of the cochlea where the signals are generated. There is concern about the invasive nature of t-ECOG in comparison to extratympanic recording techniques. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety issues, complications, and patient experience with t-ECOG., Study Design: Observational study utilizing retrospective chart review and patient survey., Methods: The medical records of 205 patients who underwent t-ECOG were reviewed for complications. Complications included persistent tympanic membrane perforation, hearing loss, otitis media, otitis externa, ear canal injury, hemotympanum, and pain. An additional 36 patients undergoing t-ECOG were surveyed on subjective measures such as pain during topical anesthesia of the tympanic membrane, during transtympanic placement of the needle electrode, and during the test procedure and overall experience with t-ECOG., Results: There was one case of a nonhealed, persistent perforation in the setting of acute otitis media directly as a result of t-ECOG. Two patients developed otitis media, and three patients had ear pain for up to 5 days. All 36 patients felt the procedure to be tolerable with minimal discomfort., Conclusions: Transtympanic electrocochleography may be performed with good patient acceptance and infrequent complications.

A system for recording of evoked potentials from auditory stimulation was developed. The system consists of a PC equipped with an audio bandwidth board with analog input and output channels. The sound stimulus signal is generated in the computer, D/A converted, and via audio amplifier fed to earphones on the test subject. Auditory evoked potentials in response to sound stimuli are recorded via electrodes, amplified and filtered in an EEG recording system and fed to an A/D converter. The signal is analysed in the PC. The modular design of the program makes it a flexible system where stimulus and recording parameters can easily be modified and new applications can be added to standard clinical measurements. Three applications that are not possible with commercially available systems were developed and evaluated. a) A diagnostic procedure to verify hydrops in patients with Meniere's disease. b) Intraoperative recordings of auditory evoked potentials during neurootological surgery. c) Recording of mismatch negativity (MMN) potentials in evaluation of central auditory functions.

Objective: To perform hearing screenings on all newborns before hospital discharge, using auditory brainstem evoked responses with analysis of time, cost, and failure rates to evaluate and determine the screening practicality., Method: Over a 3-year period from January 1, 1993 to December 31, 1995, auditory brainstem evoked response screenings were performed on 15 749 infants born at Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, before their hospital discharge by certified/licensed audiologists. The auditory brainstem evoked response screenings were conducted using the Nicolet Compass Evoked Potential System., Results: A 3-year experience of testing 15 749 infants proved to be a cost-effective program with costs less than $30.00/baby. To date, 46 babies have been identified with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and 6 babies with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss., Conclusions: The universal newborn hearing screening program at Saint Barnabas Medical Center has proved to be effective, beneficial, and necessary for an institution with more than 5000 births, annually. Early identification of hearing loss has resulted in infants receiving early intervention, and the screening program has provided education and follow-up services to both parents and physicians.

The ABR Delta V technique involves measuring the difference in latency of the wave V click-evoked ABR in the presence of ipsilateral high-pass noise filtered at 1.42 kHz and at 5.68 kHz. It has been reported that a small latency difference between the two conditions is suggestive of Ménière's disease. The aim of this study was to establish normative data for two commercially available systems. The latency differences obtained in the present study are considerably smaller than those previously reported in the literature. Other problems, including difficulty in identifying wave V in the masked conditions, prevent us from currently using this test technique. There are a number of technical problems which may account for some of the problems experienced when implementing the Delta V technique with commercial equipment and there is at least the possibility that the problems may be overcome in the future.

A questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate the relative comfort of a comprehensive range of diagnostic procedures. The mean comfort ranking and variability in comfort were examined. Pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry are the most comfortable tests, while caloric testing and transtympanic electrocochleography are the least comfortable. However, caloric testing and glycerol dehydration are not significantly different in comfort to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and brainstem evoked response testing is more comfortable than other diagnostic tests, including MRI. The reasons for these differences and the implications for diagnostic management are discussed.

Poor electrical stability of the recording electrode contact is often responsible for unstable recording conditions in extratympanic electrocochleography (ECochG). We present a new method with a large contact area formed by conductive fluid effectively penetrating the non-conductive film of wax and epidermis down to conductive tissue. The need for special cleaning of the external auditory meatus, often involving uncomfortable scratching of the sensitive area close to the tympanic membrane, has been eliminated, reducing the risk of infection and markedly improving the patient's test tolerance. Stable electrical contact improves the recording quality. We discuss a simplified clinical method, a new type of electrode, and patient risk factors as a result of possible accidental electrode movement.

One child in 750 is born with a handicapping hearing impairment. The methods available to screen and evaluate infants at risk (auditory brainstem responses, middle latency responses, and cortical auditory evoked potentials) are reviewed, explained, and illustrated with case histories.

Although the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma as classically described is generally thought to be easy, this is not always true for this so-called "ear tumor" which is localized within the internal auditory meatus. Recently, remarkable progress has been made in the diagnostic instrumentation and operative techniques used to treat acoustic neuroma, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis so that treatment can take place earlier than before. Through early diagnosis, some cases of total resection of acoustic neuroma have recently become possible, with preservation of not only facial nerve function, but preservation of auditory function as well. In the present report, we outline the early diagnosis of acoustic neuroma by summarizing 37 cases of acoustic neuroma experienced at our institution. We discuss historical presentations, and laboratory tests used in diagnosis including pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, auditory brainstem evoked response (ABR), vestibular caloric stimulation, and computed tomography (CT) enhanced by introduction of air into the posterior fossa. Two representative cases are also presented. It should be emphasized that no clinical test is 100% sensitive or specific, and attention must be paid to chronological discrepancies in the patient's presentation and "cookbook"-type approaches to evaluation should be avoided.

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) to clicks is widely used for early detection of hearing loss in the child at risk for hearing dysfunction, but there is a lack of direct, large-sample estimates of test accuracy. In this report, results and preliminary analyses are presented that relate click ABR thresholds obtained at 3 to 12 months corrected age to detailed follow-up behavioral puretone audiometry at 3 to 8 years of age, for 1,367 ears in 713 children at risk for hearing loss. The data are analyzed in terms of conventional 2 x 2 decision matrices and associated parameters, using dichotomous (binary) measures of hearing loss and ABR test outcome. The accuracy of the ABR appears to depend strongly on the precise criteria that are chosen to define both hearing loss and ABR outcome. ABR accuracy is excellent for detecting average sensorineural hearing loss at 2 and 4 kHz in excess of 30 dB, and the overall results for a wide range of hearing loss and ABR abnormality criteria can be conveniently summarized in terms of relative operating characteristics (ROCs).

The correlation between pure-tone bone conduction thresholds (BC) and thresholds obtained by electrocochleography with bone conducted stimulation (BC-ECoG) for 1, 2, 4 and 8 kHz was studied in 26 ears due for ear surgery. The correlations proved to be statistically highly significant and the results lend support to the conclusion that BC-ECoG can be considered to be well adapted for clinical use in cases where conventional audiometry has failed to reveal the capacity of the cochlea.

In its clinical use, the auditory brainstem responses, ABR, are recovered from the background noise by averaging a number of post-stimulus time epochs, sweeps. Normally, the test protocol prescribes a fixed number of sweeps to be employed and recording of replications is frequently recommended, too. Since both the ABR and the background noise differ in magnitude among patients and test sessions, such a test protocol can never ensure a given minimum "quality" or signal-to-noise ratio, SNR, of the averaged ABR. In an attempt to solve this problem, a method is proposed to evaluate, in statistical terms, the "quality" or SNR of the averaged recording. This is done by calculating the ratio between the estimated magnitude of the ABR and that of the averaged background noise. The method can be employed "on-line" in an adaptive strategy to estimate the number of sweeps necessary to obtain a given minimum "quality" of the averaged ABR. It can be used in suprathreshold recordings as well as in automatic "threshold" detection and it is a practical tool to analyze and improve the cost-benefit of the ABR test.

The amplitude spectra of the auditory brainstem potentials evoked by free-field stimuli revealed significant differences from the corresponding spectra of pre-stimulus records. This was most marked for low order harmonics and in response to high intensity stimuli. In general, however, the shape of the amplitude spectrum for pre-stimulus and post-stimulus epochs was similar and the magnitude of the differences between corresponding harmonics became progressively smaller as stimulus intensity was reduced. Given that the spectrum of each coherent grand average is a function of the amplitude and phase spectra of the response ensemble, these were separately examined. Ensemble mean amplitude of individual harmonics diminished with stimulus intensity while their phases became progressively less aggregated. Phase standard deviation, used as a parameter of this aggregation, was found to change more systemically with stimulus intensity than ensemble mean amplitude. Phase standard deviation values for threshold responses were generally significantly smaller than corresponding harmonics obtained from sub-threshold responses. By contrast the amplitude differences between populations of threshold and sub-threshold responses were generally non-significant. These findings suggested that fully objective methods of threshold determination might more successfully be based on ensemble phase measures rather than amplitude measures.

Auditory brainstem response potentials were recorded from normally hearing subjects using a wide range of stimulus intensities including a below-threshold condition. Various measures, including the traditional Jewett V (JV) amplitude, were taken from the recordings. The probability of incorrectly concluding that a response was present was found by analysing the distribution of the JV amplitude in the no-stimulus recordings and setting an amplitude of 100 nV as the criterion of whether or not a response is deemed to be present. This probability was used to define equivalent criteria for the other measures and evoked potential (EP) thresholds could then be found for each subject and stimulus by finding the lowest stimulus intensity at which the value of the measure being considered was at or above this criterion value. Two measures were found to give significantly lower and less variable EP thresholds than the others; JV amplitude taking into account the JV latency and a self-template measure involving the correlation between the response waveforms at a high stimulus intensity level and the test intensity level. The latter measure indicates that a template-matching method of threshold estimation might be as reliable for this purpose as the measurement of JV amplitude and has the potential diagnostic advantage over JV measurements that it could be readily used with a fully objective automatic threshold evaluation protocol. The probability of making a false-positive error was found to be disconcertingly high at 0.5 for single measures and 0.22 for complex measures. This underlines the need for replicates to be taken as this dramatically reduces the probability of large errors in threshold estimation.

In a test-retest experiment inaccuracies in the measurement of the peak latencies and threshold of the auditory brainstem response were determined for a group with normal hearing and for a group with cochlear hearing loss. The inaccuracy of the auditory brainstem response threshold is less than 4 dB in both groups. The inaccuracy in latency was measured as a function of stimulation level. In both groups the latency inaccuracy of peak V varies from 0.1 ms at levels well above threshold to 0.2 ms near the response threshold. Analysis of variance showed that in subjects with normal hearing the intra- and interindividual variabilities of the peak V latencies contribute about equally to the total variance at all stimulation levels. The implications that these findings have for the determination of the horizontal shift of the latency-intensity curve are discussed.

To assess the reliability of ABR testing of NICU infants, longitudinal ABR testing was accomplished on 50 NICU infants while hospitalized and subsequently at 4 and at 20-24 months of age. The results indicate that ABR testing in the NICU may be a poor predictor of subsequent permanent hearing loss. The implications of these findings are discussed with the recommendation that ABR testing in the NICU be used in concert with follow-up testing.

Audiological test protocols were devised for use in patients suspected of having a cerebellopontine angle tumor. Data supporting the logic for inclusion of each test are presented. Protocol design was based on test results obtained in 45 tumor and 554 non-tumor patients. In summary, we found: 1) speech-in-noise results were of some value in those patients with normal hearing and of no value in those patients with hearing loss, 2) the acoustic reflex test gave misleading information in 25% of patients, and 3) the ABR test proved to be the most effective test in separating tumor and non-tumor patients. All individuals having cerebellopontine angle tumors and 11% of those without such lesions had abnormal ABR results in this series.

The clinical utility of auditory evoked potentials for validation of the pure tone audiogram in adult compensation claimants and medicolegal patients is examined. Large sample comparisons of evoked potential and conventional pure tone thresholds showed that the slow vertex response can estimate true hearing levels within 10 dB in almost all patients. Given adequate tester skills, it is the tool of choice, and it merits more widespread implementation. Properly used, it can improve and abbreviate the assessment battery for detection and quantification of nonorganic hearing loss. The 40-Hz middle latency response is useful as a secondary tool, but at present, cochlear nerve and brain stem potentials have limited audiometric value in this population.

We reported a comparison of auditory brainstem response (ABR)-estimated hearing levels with hearing levels by pure-tone audiogram for 84 ears of 42 children. Their average age was 34 months at the time of ABR and 73 months for the audiogram. Thus, all of these children were managed clinically on the basis of their ABR results. The ABR accurately predicted the pure-tone average (PTA) in 76% and was in error by no more than about +/- 10-12 dB in another 18%.

Overestimation of hearing loss is a significant problem in the assessment of workers exposed to industrial noise. Audiometric and epidemiologic aspects of this problem are examined in 2,528 compensation claimants. Electric Response Audiometry (ERA) using the cortical Slow Vertex Response (SVR) is accurate and very useful for quantification of true hearing levels. Based on this technique, 8% of claimants were shown to have volunteered excessively high behavioral thresholds. Using the term "exaggerated hearing loss" (EHL) as an umbrella for this phenomenon, true thresholds of EHL and non-EHL groups were identical. Several demographic and occupational factors appear to be associated with EHL. The performance of various audiometric rules for EHL prediction was highly dependent on the criteria adopted; all rules were better than chance, though none was impressive. Clinical acumen and ERA both play a vital part in accurate assessment of the compensation claimant.